|
HS Code |
884659 |
| Cas Number | 26780-50-7 |
| Molecular Formula | (C4H6O2)n |
| Molar Mass | 86.09 g/mol (repeating unit) |
| Appearance | White to off-white solid |
| Melting Point | 175-180 °C |
| Density | 1.25 g/cm³ |
| Biodegradability | Biodegradable |
| Glass Transition Temperature | 4 °C |
| Solubility In Water | Insoluble |
| Tensile Strength | 20-40 MPa |
| Elongation At Break | 5-10% |
| Thermal Decomposition Temperature | Around 290 °C |
As an accredited Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate) factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate) is supplied in a 100g sealed, opaque polyethylene bottle with a tamper-evident cap and product labeling. |
| Shipping | Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate) is typically shipped as a solid powder or granular resin in sealed, moisture-resistant containers. It should be kept away from heat, direct sunlight, and moisture during transit. Handle and store in a dry, cool environment. Packaging usually follows standard regulations for non-hazardous, industrial polymers. |
| Storage | Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) should be stored in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated area, away from direct sunlight, moisture, and sources of heat. Keep the material in tightly closed containers to prevent contamination and degradation. Store away from strong acids, bases, and oxidizing agents. Ensure proper labeling and follow standard procedures for biopolymer storage to maintain material stability. |
|
Purity 99%: Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate) with 99% purity is used in biomedical implant manufacturing, where it ensures biocompatibility and reduces the risk of adverse reactions. Molecular Weight 600 kDa: Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate) at a molecular weight of 600 kDa is used in biodegradable packaging films, where it provides enhanced mechanical strength and improved film durability. Melting Point 175°C: Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate) with a melting point of 175°C is used in injection molding processes, where it enables precise thermal processing and dimensional stability of molded components. Particle Size <10 µm: Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate) with particle size below 10 µm is used in 3D printing filament production, where it fosters smooth extrusion and uniform filament texture. Viscosity Grade 150 Pa·s: Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate) with a viscosity grade of 150 Pa·s is used in coating formulations, where it allows for controlled application and consistent film thickness. Stability Temperature 120°C: Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate) with a stability temperature of 120°C is used in agricultural mulch films, where it maintains integrity under field conditions and supports biodegradation after use. Crystallinity 70%: Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate) with 70% crystallinity is used in disposable tableware manufacturing, where it delivers rigidity and enhances product stiffness for food service applications. |
Competitive Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate) prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to admin@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: admin@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
The world keeps searching for fresh answers to the plastic waste crisis. Plenty of products claim to offer hope, yet most stumble at scale or cost. Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate), better known as PHB, stands out from the crowd in real ways that matter. Having handled a few alternatives myself, I can say this material isn’t chasing hype. It brings genuine promise to the table for manufacturers, designers, and anyone tired of old plastic’s footprint. Here’s why PHB deserves some attention and respect.
PHB belongs to the family of polyhydroxyalkanoates, a mouthful that covers a group of natural polyesters made by certain bacteria. This isn’t some obscure lab curiosity; it’s a biopolymer grown from living organisms, mainly through fermentation of renewable resources like sugar and vegetable oils. If you touch a pellet of PHB, it feels much like the more recognized polypropylene. That’s the first thing folks notice. Yet beneath that feel lies a chemical structure the environment can understand and break down with relative ease. Unlike polylactic acid (PLA) or starch-based bioplastics, PHB doesn’t stay locked up in landfills indefinitely.
Working hands-on with PHB shows right away that this isn’t some brittle, fragile bioplastic. With a relatively high melting point—usually around 175°C—it stands up to processes such as injection molding, film blowing, or extrusion without turning into a headache for the operator. Think of it as sharing similarities with some common thermoplastics: good tensile strength, moderate flexibility, and resistance to moisture. A lot of folks are surprised to learn PHB items won’t absorb much water over time. This alone knocks down one major barrier many compostable plastics face.
PHB also resists ultraviolet light better than many other bioplastics. That’s valuable for packaging or outdoor gear. You get a product that can last a reasonable shelf life, then break down quickly and safely once composted in the proper environment. Anyone who's tried to compost PLA or traditional plastics will know the frustration of finding remnants months later; PHB breaks that cycle.
Plenty of bioplastic candidates never make it out of the R&D lab. PHB, on the other hand, is already popping up in places that matter. Medical device makers looked early at PHB for dissolvable sutures and scaffolds because it degrades into harmless byproducts inside the human body. Fast-moving consumer goods companies are testing PHB for single-use items—think cutlery, packaging films, and even food containers. What won’t work for an industrial plant might fit perfectly in a home composter, and PHB takes that challenge seriously.
In regions burdened by landfill overflow, some municipalities trial PHB products for food service and organic waste bags. It’s not the only bioplastic on the market, but it stands out in efficiency and end-of-life behavior. Farmers, too, have adopted PHB to create mulch films that don’t require retrieval at the season’s end. They simply till the leftovers into the soil, saving labor and reducing non-degradable waste. I’ve seen this play out in small-scale trials, where PHB left fewer microplastics behind than many alternatives.
Here’s the tough part: not every bioplastic option actually helps with pollution. Some require high-industrial composting, or they leave persistent residues that defeat the purpose. Many people, myself included, ran into PLA-based “green” plastics that wouldn’t disappear from backyard compost. PHB sets itself apart. It breaks down in soil and water under natural conditions. Microbes take care of the job—no need to truck the waste to specialized facilities or pump extra energy into the process.
PHB's unique ability to process in existing plastic manufacturing lines makes life easier for companies unwilling or unable to overhaul their factories. The compatibility means you don’t have to sink huge sums into new tools or skills. Plus, PHB lacks the strange, sometimes unpleasant smell that creeps up with other “eco” plastics during heat processing. Working with PHB, you pick up both efficiency and a kinder ecological footprint.
A lot of old-school thermoplastics—polypropylene, polyethylene, PET—set a high bar. They’re cheap, tough, and pretty easy to customize. Still, PHB gives them a run for their money in several metrics. It comes very close in impact strength to polypropylene, one of the most widely used plastics for everything from automotive parts to yogurt containers. While PHB sometimes trails a bit behind in elasticity, it holds its own for most disposable applications.
The real battle happens at end-of-life. Polyolefins and PET clutter up oceans and landfills for centuries. PHB can disappear by natural processes within a handful of months under the right conditions—sometimes even less in warm, moist environments. More reassuring: PHB decomposes into carbon dioxide and water, with no lingering toxins. If you’ve ever felt conflicted buying one-use plastics, knowing something can actually cycle back to the biosphere is a big relief.
Industrial PHB comes primarily from bacterial fermentation. You start with basic inputs like glucose or plant-based oils, feed them to selected microbial strains, and harvest the resulting polymer. Unlike petroleum-derived plastics, PHB’s raw ingredients renew through ordinary farming or industrial waste conversions.
Processing PHB isn’t all that different from handling more familiar resins. Companies use standard extruders, injection molders, and film machines. What might surprise some is PHB’s ability to perform with minimal additives, especially compared to PLA, which sometimes begs for extra plasticizers to keep it from cracking. PHB’s straightforward recipe cuts down on unwanted stuff in the final product. That’s a detail worth more than a footnote, especially for anyone with skin sensitivities or allergies.
Stack PHB against PLA, PBAT, PHA copolymers, or starch composites, and the differences come through. PLA enjoys popularity because of its price and commercial scale, but struggles with durability and water resistance. PBAT—a petrochemical copolyester—offers flexibility, but falls short on renewability and decomposition rate outside managed environments. Starch-based plastics sometimes cost less, but they swell and degrade unpredictably if humidity spikes.
PHB stays ahead in a few critical areas: it resists temperature swings, shrugs off most humidity, and doesn’t need chemical stabilizers for every use. If you care about microplastic pollution, PHB has another advantage. Its breakdown doesn’t produce persistent fragments the way traditional polyester blends often do. The material cycles smoothly through natural decomposition, whether in a well-managed compost pile or accidentally lost in nature.
Plenty of companies promise “green” at the marketing level, but PHB delivers measurable results up and down the life cycle. Start with carbon footprint: since the base sugars come from crops, PHB production grabs carbon dioxide from the atmosphere instead of releasing it. Process energy demands still exist—it’s not a miracle cure—but the net greenhouse gas hit tends to be lower than for petroplastics. More, modern fermentation methods harness local agricultural residues or even food industry byproducts, sidestepping the competition with food supply chains.
On the waste side, PHB proves easier to recover or compost. In places where waste sorting lags, leftover PHB rarely sticks around. Microbes present in soil or water set to work quickly on this substrate. Industrial composters have documented far faster breakdown for PHB than for PLA or polycaprolactone. Even outside specialized facilities, PHB decomposes in a matter of months, given reasonable moisture and microbial activity. That’s a major edge for regions lacking advanced waste management infrastructure.
No one should think PHB answers every plastic problem out there. Price continues as one obstacle. The cost of growing and fermenting raw materials sits higher than buying a barrel of oil for most of the world. Process engineers also face some quirks after molding—PHB can be vulnerable to stress cracking if not handled well, particularly in products facing sharp bends or heavy loads. While the material resists moisture, repeated heating cycles weaken it, and its shelf life before processing can be limited by certain storage conditions.
Scaling up remains the trickiest part. Current biorefineries producing PHB do so at relatively modest volumes compared to the giants of polyethylene or PET. Still, rapid improvement happens as demand grows. Several major firms in North America, Asia, and Europe have started investing in better fermenters, more robust bacterial strains, and smarter supply chains. As more players enter the space, prices are already showing signs of softening—and if government incentives or extended producer responsibility regulations move forward, PHB could gain a sharper cost edge.
Policy makers and businesses would do well to consider targeted subsidies or research grants for PHB expansion. If governments place fees on persistent single-use plastics, PHB’s competitive gap narrows further. Getting private companies on board means demonstrating real cost of disposal—not just up-front purchase price. My own conversations with food packaging firms show interest spikes when waste management fees factor in, highlighting the importance of robust local waste policies.
More research will push PHB’s performance and price closer to mainstream plastics. Today’s fermentation strains operate below their potential. Bioengineers are already developing engineered bacteria with higher yields, faster turnaround, and the ability to digest mixed or low-value feedstocks. Improving process integration—say, tying PHB production to existing sugar mills or agro-industrial hubs—spreads costs across more value chains.
Conversations I’ve had with industrial designers and engineers echo a few key patterns. Those coming from PLA appreciate PHB’s enhanced stability, especially in wet or humid applications. Food service operators find PHB containers resist deformation near hot foods or steam, avoiding the warping that has plagued some early-generation alternatives. Medical device manufacturers value PHB’s clean breakdown pathway inside the body, as research confirms no buildup of toxic metabolites.
Earth-conscious brands want packaging that sends a message without backfiring on performance. PHB’s clear biobased origin, compostable finish, and petroleum-free story check those boxes. Actual feedback often centers on peace of mind: not having to worry whether a biodegradable product will really “go away.” For shoppers, little things matter—the lack of odd plasticky odors or jams in local recycling machines earns real points with those fed up with greenwashing.
PHB stands at an interesting crossroads. While production still trails the scale of long-established plastics, the material already fills a crucial gap between conventional, persistent polymers and the often-undelivered promises of other bioplastics. Researchers chart a path to even better versions: copolymers that boost flexibility, additives from natural sources that enhance UV resistance, and blends that keep shelf life high but compost time short.
For now, PHB does not pretend to fix every single issue associated with plastics. Instead, it invites a realistic conversation about tradeoffs, priorities, and positive shifts. Land, energy, bacterial fermentation—all these pieces operate in a delicate dance. The best results emerge where supply chains align local resources and smart logistics. By improving process yields, optimizing logistics, and setting clear composting standards, society can unlock wider PHB adoption without resorting to magical thinking or greenwashed claims.
If you’re running a manufacturing shop or a food business, PHB could fit well into certain product lines. The learning curve isn’t steep for seasoned plastic handlers. Packaging, single-use foodware, cosmetic containers, agricultural supplies—these all stand to benefit. For consumers, pressure to demand clear labelling and disposal options remains key. Waste systems must adapt so PHB actually returns to the earth, not gets trapped in “recyclables-only” streams or landfills without microbial life.
Expanding access will take some serious investment and cooperation. More local governments can help by shifting procurement policies in favor of products that work with compostable waste bins. Schools and public institutions have already started pilots in select cities, giving valuable feedback on performance and disposal. Step by step, PHB is carving out a place well beyond boutique green brands or fancy conference swag.
I’ve watched community events switch from oil-based plastics to bioplastics, only to regret the move when waste piles failed to break down as promised. PHB finally put an end to those worries in the places it was trialed. What struck most people was the visible, rapid disintegration by natural forces—no slick marketing needed to sell it. This sort of progress matters for environmental advocates and industry managers alike.
Most of all, PHB signals a possibility: that society can shift away from disposable, fossil-derived materials without giving up the convenience or utility demanded by modern life. It won’t happen all at once, but the groundwork is real. Science has the technical knowledge to grow and shape this material, and the practical case keeps getting stronger as pressures on the waste system mount. For anyone tired of “recyclable” lies or half-baked green labels, PHB opens a door to responsible, soil-friendly plastics—without cutting corners or hiding behind wishful thinking.