|
HS Code |
504404 |
| Cas Number | 27813-02-1 |
| Chemical Formula | C7H12O3 |
| Molecular Weight | 144.17 g/mol |
| Appearance | Clear, colorless to pale yellow liquid |
| Boiling Point | 220°C |
| Melting Point | -36°C |
| Density | 1.066 g/cm3 at 20°C |
| Refractive Index | 1.450 - 1.455 at 20°C |
| Solubility In Water | Miscible |
| Flash Point | 97°C (Closed cup) |
| Odor | Mild, characteristic odor |
| Viscosity | 7-11 mPa·s at 20°C |
As an accredited Hydroxypropyl Methacrylate factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Hydroxypropyl Methacrylate is packaged in a 25 kg blue HDPE drum with airtight, tamper-evident seal and hazard labeling. |
| Shipping | Hydroxypropyl Methacrylate is shipped in tightly sealed, corrosion-resistant containers, typically drums or IBCs. It should be stored and transported in a cool, well-ventilated area, away from heat, open flames, and incompatible substances. Proper labeling, compliance with relevant transport regulations, and use of appropriate personal protective equipment are essential during handling and shipping. |
| Storage | Hydroxypropyl Methacrylate should be stored in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area, away from heat, sparks, open flames, and direct sunlight. Keep the container tightly closed and protect from moisture. Store away from oxidizing agents, acids, and polymerization initiators. Recommended storage temperature is below 30°C. Use only approved containers and avoid prolonged exposure to air to prevent polymerization. |
|
Purity 99%: Hydroxypropyl Methacrylate with purity 99% is used in dental resin formulations, where it enhances polymerization efficiency and mechanical strength. Viscosity Grade Low: Hydroxypropyl Methacrylate of low viscosity grade is used in UV-curable coatings, where it improves substrate wetting and uniform film formation. Molecular Weight 142.17 g/mol: Hydroxypropyl Methacrylate with molecular weight 142.17 g/mol is used in contact lens manufacturing, where it allows precise control over water content and oxygen permeability. Melting Point 55°C: Hydroxypropyl Methacrylate with melting point 55°C is used in ophthalmic solutions, where it ensures stable solubility and repeatable formulation quality. Stability Temperature up to 150°C: Hydroxypropyl Methacrylate stable up to 150°C is used in high-temperature polymerization processes, where it maintains consistent reactivity and product integrity. Particle Size <50 μm: Hydroxypropyl Methacrylate with particle size less than 50 μm is used in specialty adhesives, where it promotes homogeneous mixing and smooth application. Residual Monomer <0.3%: Hydroxypropyl Methacrylate with residual monomer content less than 0.3% is used in biomedical hydrogels, where it minimizes toxicity and enhances biocompatibility. Refractive Index 1.451: Hydroxypropyl Methacrylate with refractive index 1.451 is used in optical polymer fabrication, where it delivers excellent light transmission and optical clarity. |
Competitive Hydroxypropyl Methacrylate prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to admin@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: admin@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Every so often, a single component changes the possibilities for formulators across adhesives, coatings, and the production of specialty polymers. Hydroxypropyl Methacrylate, known among chemists as HPMA, has become a key player in this shift. I remember the first time I saw HPMA in action in an R&D coating lab—the finished resin had more flexibility and clarity than anything we’d seen using traditional acrylics. On the table sat two test bars: one dull and brittle, the other clear with just enough flex to resist a solid crack. The difference came down to using HPMA in the recipe.
What sets HPMA apart starts with its balance between reactivity and compatibility. In its liquid state, HPMA offers high purity—most industrial supplies guarantee over 97% content. This often means better batch-to-batch consistency and more predictable results on the production line. That matters when even small swings can ruin an adhesive’s strength or a lens polymer’s transparency. Many people outside the lab might not realize, but unpredictable batches cost time and kill trust in an industrial setting.
Looking at the chemical structure, HPMA merges the reactive methacryloyl group with a hydroxypropyl chain. This gives the molecule a dual nature: the methacrylate end grabs attention because it acts as the anchor point during polymerization. The hydroxy group, tucked on the other side, opens up hydrogen bonding and crosslinking possibilities in a way standard methyl methacrylate or ethyl methacrylate can’t match. Running a synthesis with HPMA, I noticed how it brought better wetting and finer control over glass transition—especially important for coatings you want to resist scratches without getting brittle.
Examining HPMA’s properties, the typical clear, mobile liquid offers a boiling point high enough to handle reactive blending under moderate heating. This reduces losses to evaporation before curing starts. Water solubility lands at a level that invites creative blending with both waterborne and solvent-borne systems. Some adhesives and lens resins have moved over to partial or full HPMA content just for the enhanced solubility and mix compatibility. The usual package comes stabilized with a dash of MEHQ (monomethyl ether hydroquinone)—an antioxidant that extends shelf life and keeps unwanted pre-polymerization from spoiling whole batches.
Pull in other methacrylates for comparison and the contrast grows. Methyl methacrylate, the old staple of plexiglass, runs fast, sets hard, and it’s hard to compete with it for raw hardness. Hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) brings better hydrophilicity, making it the choice for soft contact lenses and hydrogels, but it doesn’t offer the same balance between flexibility and adhesion strength. HPMA lives in this middle ground. Manufacturers of coatings and adhesives can reach for HPMA when they want a touch more flexibility and water compatibility without giving up the quick set and strength that’s a hallmark of (meth)acrylates.
In coatings, HPMA doesn’t hide in the background. It’s a recognized way to improve scratch resistance on wood and metal finishes without the pain of constant reformulation. An engineer I worked alongside in flooring finishes once commented, “If the coating cracks, we get callbacks. HPMA helps us sleep at night.” HPMA upgrades binder toughness by securing stronger micro-crosslinks within the network, all without making the film chalky or prone to crumbling.
HPMA carries over into adhesives for automotive trim and structural bonds as well. Here, fast curing needs to align with reliable bond strength and weatherability. HPMA shows up not just for its fast polymerization, but for its knack at improving peel and shear resistance. I’ve seen assembly line bonds with HPMA outperform both the old pure acrylates and even some newer, fancier dual-component systems that cost more on the bill of materials.
Ophthalmic polymerers—used for clear, tough contact and intraocular lenses—lean on HPMA too. Lenses with HPMA often come out clearer, with reduced risk of water uptake and swelling. In biomedical circles, I’ve noticed surgeons and nurses feel more confidence using devices based on HPMA-crosslinked hydrogels. Materials need to hold up through sterilization and body fluid contact; HPMA makes that less of a gamble.
Safety questions land on any new ingredient. In my lab years, handling HPMA followed the standard precautions laid out for acrylate monomers. It has a slightly higher threshold for worker skin irritation compared to the most basic methacrylates, though proper gloves and ventilation make a big difference. Most factory safety data still place HPMA a bit below styrene in terms of risk, but higher than ethyl acrylate. I’ve seen pushback from workers new to the material, with concerns about smell and splashes, though over time, the track record has shown that HPMA behaves well under routine industrial safeguards. I haven’t seen a mass shift to non-acrylic alternatives for this reason—comfort with a material and clear safety protocols go a long way.
Sustainability gets more attention now than it did a decade ago, and rightly so. Most HPMA sold worldwide comes from petrochemical streams, but some suppliers are looking to increase biobased methacrylate content. I’ve attended a handful of webinars where new pilot programs promise improved supply chain traceability, and a few operations have managed to drive greenhouse gas emissions down by swapping portions of fossil feedstocks with fermented sugars. For now, though, the greener sources run a premium and see most uptake in Europe and Japan, where the regulatory push is harder. Small manufacturers in developing economies usually stay with the conventional product, driven by tighter margins and less pressure from downstream customers.
For those concerned about waste, HPMA resins do not typically break down in the environment without help—UV and heat eventually fragment the polymers, but landfill leaching remains rare based on current landfill monitoring. Still, disposal by incineration remains the default for large-volume waste at factories I’ve visited. Waterborne HPMA coatings have nudged the sector toward less reliance on solvents, giving environmental managers a real lever to pull. My experience shows that companies who market “low-VOC” or “water-cleanup” products often see customer loyalty rise—most DIYers and contractors value both ease of use and reduced smell.
The chemistry world talks a lot about final properties—toughness, clarity, resilience—but economics often decides what makes it into a company’s product line. HPMA isn’t the cheapest monomer at the chemical warehouse. You’ll sometimes see prices tick higher during times of tight acrylate supply or transportation trouble, especially during disruptions like hurricanes or port strikes. Some purchasing managers have told me they fence in HPMA orders early in the year to avoid scrambling during peak demand periods. Despite the premium, the material’s value comes through in the way it streamlines production. Less scrap, fewer rejects, and simpler curing save money down the line.
In the coatings sector, decision-makers appreciate how HPMA-based systems avoid full reformulation when local regulations kick out older solvents. Switching to waterborne HPMA still nails the performance targets without lengthy new product qualification. On the adhesive side, R&D costs drop once shops convert legacy systems to HPMA-infused blends—fewer unsolved failures, easier regulatory paperwork, and more leeway to work around the periodic supply chain hiccup. I’ve heard from mid-sized factories that their annual maintenance headaches fall after converting to HPMA thickened coatings. Fewer repairs mean more stable production runs and less overtime for the maintenance crew.
In eyewear applications, the clarity, strength, and water resistance required for premium lenses lifts HPMA from “nice to have” to “essential.” Market share for contact and intraocular lenses built around HPMA keeps rising, especially in regions where consumer spending supports buying higher quality and specialty optical products. Market analysts point out a persistent trend: as populations age, and eye surgeries increase, the need for clear, biocompatible, and stable lens materials like HPMA climbs. Few other methacrylates have managed to lock in the same position.
Innovation never stands still. Researchers keep pushing HPMA in new directions. A team I collaborated with explored blends of HPMA and HEMA to tune the water absorption for wound dressing hydrogels—these hybrid gels offered both structural support and enough flexibility to survive handling and patient movement. Another project paired HPMA with polyurethane acrylates to develop new UV-curing formulations for rapid-setting coatings on industrial floors. Feedback from facilities managers highlighted the improved hardness and chemical resistance, with less downtime waiting for the floor finish to complete its cure cycle.
Some energy goes into lowering the risk of residual monomer in finished goods. Too much leftover monomer spells stronger smell and the chance of skin irritation upon use. Optimizing cure conditions, including fine-tuned initiator levels and longer cure times, can help drop those final residues well below the levels seen in older systems. I once consulted on a plastics project where odor complaints dropped by 70% after switching to HPMA-rich formulations managed with tighter cure times and automated process monitoring. Small changes at the factory level add up in the hands of experienced operators with good process data.
Looking at recycling, HPMA has lagged behind biopolymers in reusability, but efforts are picking up. University groups and a few startups are tinkering with chemical depolymerization approaches to break HPMA-rich waste streams down for fresh monomers. Early results show partial recovery is physically possible, but energy costs and market price stability for the recovered material still need more work. A plant manager I met at a chemical expo voiced cautious optimism: “If the recyclers can drop their price to under half the cost of new monomer, we’d try it.” For now, HPMA users watching the green transition keep their options open, fingers crossed for more progress here.
No material comes without headaches. One of HPMA’s trickiest gaps sits in its storage sensitivity. Light and heat accelerate unwanted reactions; drum storage calls for cool, shaded environments, with tight seals. Some operators in hot climates have faced batch loss when warehouse cooling failed. One larger operation I visited in Texas invested in an automatic temperature and humidity control system. They tracked much less off-spec product waste year-over-year after making the switch.
Another challenge comes from regulatory drift. In a handful of Asian and European markets, new environmental rules keep piling on demands for full ingredient disclosure and lower workplace exposure thresholds. Chemists sometimes get caught reworking formulas late in development when older HPMA blends suddenly run afoul of those shifts. In one case, a coatings lab I advised found a solution by tweaking additive packages—adding more photoinitiators to speed up polymerization, or swapping in anti-yellowing stabilizers to comply with the new shelf-life requirements. Organizations that prioritize nimble R&D and regulatory monitoring tend to weather these changes better, and their people pick up valuable know-how along the way.
Competing materials try to edge HPMA out. Recent years saw a few silane and epoxy hybrid monomers pitched as replacements, but the technical and economic hurdles don’t always match up. A team specializing in construction adhesives showed me trial runs of the new hybrids next to HPMA blends—the HPMA product offered better flexibility under day-to-day mechanical load, with easier processing under standard plant conditions. It’s not that HPMA sticks around by pure habit; its track record in production and performance makes it the practical choice for thousands of operators worldwide.
Users keep shaping HPMA’s future. As more companies push for biobased products and improved worker health, the supply side will face steady pressure to innovate. I’ve seen firsthand how customers—big and small—vote with their orders. One European coatings manufacturer built a line around waterborne HPMA, highlighting both the low VOC content and easier cleanup as selling points. Sales climbed as architects and builders prioritized health and sustainability. Closer collaboration between chemical makers and end users shapes how these advances spread to smaller shops, where industry norms change more slowly.
On the technical front, more real-world data from users will set the agenda. Field performance, recalls, and end-user satisfaction trump theoretical test numbers every time. In my experience, keeping open channels between production, R&D, and safety teams pays off best. Frontline workers spot hazards or off-label uses before they become problems, while product managers keep a pulse on market feedback and field failures. That collective knowledge, when shared across the supply chain, keeps HPMA’s reputation strong—and pushes improvements in both production and application.
If you look at the broader market, the versatility of HPMA stands out. From sturdy coatings on architecture and vehicles to transparent polymers for medical devices, it adapts to changing demands. Efforts combining HPMA with smart sensor particles in coatings, or tuning lens polymers for light modulation, hint at the next generation of products. Success will come from staying clear on needs, listening to feedback, and building real trust between suppliers, researchers, and users on the ground. The future of HPMA isn’t about chasing every new technical fad—it’s about solving genuine problems with practical, well-characterized materials. If the chemistry stays honest, and operators keep sharing what works, the advantages of HPMA will keep rolling out in both familiar and unexpected forms.