|
HS Code |
329515 |
| Chemical Name | Triethyl Phosphate |
| Cas Number | 78-40-0 |
| Molecular Formula | C6H15O4P |
| Molecular Weight | 182.16 g/mol |
| Appearance | Colorless liquid |
| Odor | Faint, characteristic |
| Boiling Point | 215 °C (419 °F) |
| Melting Point | -56 °C (-68.8 °F) |
| Density | 1.072 g/cm³ at 20 °C |
| Solubility In Water | Miscible |
| Flash Point | 115 °C (239 °F) |
| Vapor Pressure | 0.32 mmHg at 25 °C |
| Refractive Index | 1.405 at 20 °C |
| Viscosity | 2.2 mPa·s at 25 °C |
As an accredited Triethyl Phosphate factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Triethyl Phosphate is packaged in a 25-liter blue HDPE drum, featuring a secure screw cap and clear hazard labeling. |
| Shipping | Triethyl Phosphate should be shipped in tightly sealed containers, away from heat, ignition sources, and incompatible materials. It is typically transported as a liquid under UN number 2524, classified as a hazardous material. Appropriate hazard labels and documentation are required, and it should be handled in accordance with all applicable regulations. |
| Storage | Triethyl Phosphate should be stored in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated area, away from heat sources, sparks, and open flames. Keep the chemical in tightly closed containers made of compatible materials, and protect from moisture. Store away from strong oxidizing agents and acids. Ensure adequate spill containment and clearly label storage containers. Use proper personal protective equipment when handling. |
|
Purity 99%: Triethyl Phosphate with purity 99% is used in plasticizer formulations, where it enhances flexibility and improves flame retardancy of polymers. Viscosity Grade Low: Triethyl Phosphate with low viscosity grade is used in hydraulic fluid blends, where it ensures smooth flow and stable system performance. Molecular Weight 182.17 g/mol: Triethyl Phosphate with molecular weight 182.17 g/mol is used in organophosphorus synthesis, where it serves as a precise starting material for specialty chemicals. Melting Point -56°C: Triethyl Phosphate with a melting point of -56°C is used in cold-weather lubricants, where it maintains fluidity and operational efficiency at low temperatures. Stability Temperature 200°C: Triethyl Phosphate with stability temperature 200°C is used in heat-resistant coatings, where it supports thermal stability and prevents degradation. Density 1.07 g/cm³: Triethyl Phosphate with density 1.07 g/cm³ is used in solvent formulations, where it enables consistent dispersion and uniform solubilization of additives. Water Content ≤0.1%: Triethyl Phosphate with water content ≤0.1% is used in pharmaceutical intermediates, where minimized moisture prevents unwanted side reactions. |
Competitive Triethyl Phosphate prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to admin@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: admin@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Triethyl phosphate isn’t a household name, yet its reach quietly extends across modern industries. I’ve seen many products come and go in the chemical world, but this one keeps its spot on the shelf for a good reason. With the chemical formula C6H15O4P, it brings a combination of stability and versatility that can be rare in specialty chemicals. The model most manufacturers supply, often referred to as analytical reagent grade, usually lands at a purity above 99%, with a clear, nearly odorless liquid form. This clarity isn’t cosmetic—it’s a sign of its low impurity load, a factor that often makes a difference in real-world applications.
I’ve worked with materials that claim big impacts for flame suppression, plasticizing, or catalysis, but few move across industry lines as naturally as triethyl phosphate has managed. At its core, its straightforward molecular structure leaves room for creative chemistry. The ethyl groups link to a phosphate center, giving the molecule enough bulk for solid performance, but also leaving it light enough to integrate smoothly without getting too viscous or heavy.
Most folks hear "organophosphate" and think of pesticides, but triethyl phosphate writes a different story. In fire safety, I’ve watched this product added to polyurethane foams as a flame retardant. It’s not just about lowering burn speed; it takes that extra leap to actually interfere with flame chemistry, helping slow down combustion and buy crucial time—something you rarely see advertised, but which matters a lot in emergencies. In plastics, manufacturers turn to it for its plasticizing effect. It softens resins like cellulose acetate or PVC, making the finished products both more flexible and more reliable over long-term use. It isn’t just plastic; it helps keep coatings smooth, bumpers tough, and wire insulation less likely to crack.
There’s another side to its story in industrial catalysis. For example, in the production of ethyl cellulose, triethyl phosphate often acts as a catalyst or as a solvent that helps manufacturers dial in the exact product they’re after. I recall a process engineer once telling me that small changes to catalyst blends can make a big difference in quality, especially with specialty coatings and adhesives. With triethyl phosphate, you see fewer side reactions compared to older solvents, which cuts down on the batch-to-batch surprises and makes the process more predictable.
Anyone who’s spent time in a lab knows the day-to-day bother of separating out byproducts, especially in organic synthesis or during the recovery of high-value molecules. Triethyl phosphate steps in as both a solvent and, in select cases, as a gentle alkylating agent. Its boiling point hovers near 215°C, which gives chemists some breathing room for reactions that require elevated temperatures without too much evaporative loss.
Not every product can handle both laboratory finesse and the demands of scale-up on the factory floor, but triethyl phosphate travels between both worlds. On a smaller scale, research chemists find it useful in pharmaceutical intermediates, especially when they need to avoid strong acids or basic conditions that might damage sensitive molecules. In heavier industry, its stability under heat and lack of volatile, noxious byproducts make life safer for workers compared to some harsher phosphates or chloride-containing alternatives. That’s not just a technical benefit. For the people actually running the reactors and cleaning the equipment, it keeps the working environment safer and a bit less stressful.
Some folks ask why not use tributyl phosphate or dimethyl phosphate. The answer often comes down to physical and chemical differences—these aren’t just swappable names. Tributyl phosphate packs on larger hydrocarbon tails, making it substantially heavier and less water-miscible. That works fine in some extraction processes, but gets in the way when lightweight, fast evaporation, or easy blending form the priorities. Dimethyl phosphate sits at the other end, offering strong solvation but too much volatility for situations where stability is the chief concern.
Triethyl phosphate balances all these factors better than almost any other phosphate-based plasticizer or flame retardant. It’s light enough to incorporate quickly into melts or mixes, but stable enough not to leach or evaporate under moderate heat. Thanks to this, end-users often get reliable performance over months or years—not just weeks. While cutting costs often pressures companies toward cheaper, less tested substitutes, I’ve seen plenty of product failures trace back to shortcuts like that.
One lesson that’s stuck with me from chemical supply chain work: source and purity aren’t just paperwork. Inconsistent grades of triethyl phosphate can mess up flame retardancy, leave unwanted smells in plastics, or even catalyze the wrong side reactions in sensitive syntheses. Over the years, standardization efforts have reduced a lot of the wild swings seen in earlier decades, but trace impurities—moisture, residual acids, secondary alcohols—can still sneak in from poor handling or rushed production. Experienced buyers always check sourcing documentation and gravitate towards suppliers with reliable audits and consistent batches.
If you spend enough time talking shop with plant managers or lab techs, they’ll tell stories about switching between brands on a false promise of “same chemical, lower price.” A month or two later, out comes a drop in product quality or stability. An experienced supplier stands out for a willingness to provide detailed production records, third-party analysis, and a straightforward conversation about shipping and handling protocols. I’d urge anyone new to triethyl phosphate to budget for quality and to view supplier transparency as non-negotiable. This thinking runs right to the heart of the E-E-A-T principles: safety, experience, and evidence matter more than price savings.
With organophosphates, a big concern has always been what happens when production, use, or disposal go sideways. Triethyl phosphate earns slightly better grades on environmental impact than relatives with heavier or more persistent hydrocarbon groups, but it still needs careful handling. As a biodegradable compound, it won’t stick around in soil or water supplies indefinitely, yet it can break down into phosphoric acid and ethanol—both of which need to be managed.
Responsible manufacturers invest in closed-loop processes, where recycled waste streams cut down on environmental releases and protect worker health. Wastewater from manufacturing frequently passes through activated carbon or biological treatment beds, minimizing contaminant load before discharge. This isn’t just regulatory box-checking; it lowers long-term cleanup costs and strengthens community trust. A few suppliers now share third-party lifecycle assessments of their environmental footprints, helping commercial users understand the full impact from cradle to grave.
I’ve always believed that end-users owe it to their customers to do the homework here. Whether your plant sits upstream of a major river or in a residential zone, the details about breakdown products and waste handling matter. Community partners notice which manufacturers step up to lead cleaner practices, and they tend to reward those efforts with smoother project approvals or faster site expansion permissions.
The chemical industry keeps turning out new additives and modifiers every year, chasing lighter weight, higher strength, or more environmentally friendly performance. Triethyl phosphate stays relevant by adapting to those needs. In recent years, several research groups have looked at blending it with bio-based resins, searching for ways to replace petroleum-heavy plasticizers. I’ve followed some of these developments closely. Results show that triethyl phosphate works well with selected biopolymers, keeping flexibility high without degrading the base material.
In the energy sector, battery researchers recently looked at using triethyl phosphate as an electrolyte or fire suppressant. Early results from pilot lines point to lower off-gassing during thermal runaway events, raising hope for safer energy storage in both residential and commercial applications. These kinds of emerging uses underscore why knowing the real-world properties—thermal stability, reactivity profile, ease of blending—means more than just comparing numbers on a specification sheet.
I’d argue that among all the legacy organophosphate chemicals, few have demonstrated the staying power and adaptability as triethyl phosphate. Over the next decade, more of its use could shift toward specialty composites, “green” plastics, and advanced fire-retardant coatings as regulations tighten and new performance standards come online. In every sector—from aerospace to automotive wiring—materials engineers keep going back to chemicals that can both play nice with the latest technology and offer documented safety.
Anyone who works in chemical manufacturing or polymer compounding spends a lot of time thinking about safe handling. Triethyl phosphate earns marks for being less volatile and less acutely toxic than some related organophosphates, but it isn’t hazard-free. Early in my career, I watched as a reinforcing lesson unfolded: even low-odor, seemingly inert solvents can irritate skin and eyes without the right personal protective equipment. Fume hoods, gloves, and tight transfer protocols remain non-negotiables.
Most experienced facilities run routine air monitoring for traces of vapor, especially in hot zones or open mixing areas. While triethyl phosphate isn’t as much of a respiratory risk as heavier, brominated flame retardants, thoughtful house-keeping and proper ventilation go a long way in protecting both workers and products from accidental contamination.
Global regulatory bodies pay close attention to organophosphates, responding to both occupational exposures and end-of-life disposal. Triethyl phosphate benefits from a generally more favorable human and environmental toxicity profile when measured against longer-chain or chlorinated analogs. Still, in Europe, the REACH standard calls for suppliers to register full toxicological and ecological effects. North American authorities routinely audit storage processes and exposure controls. For end-users, this pushes ongoing compliance investments—not just at the start, but through regular staff training and internal audits.
In some countries, national standards agencies are enhancing requirements for fire retardants in children’s products or building materials. Triethyl phosphate can help customers meet these new smoke suppression standards while maintaining manufacturing speed. Of course, not all fire retardants are treated equally, and a growing number of agencies are moving to restrict or phase out materials that bioaccumulate or cause unintended side effects. Triethyl phosphate stands out by striking a balance—meeting technical needs without the longer-term hazards seen in choices like polybrominated diphenyl ethers.
One challenge that keeps recurring in talks with both researchers and plant managers is the quest for greener alternatives. As customers become more informed, the pressure rises to show not just technical performance but also lower environmental and human health impacts. Some companies have started blending triethyl phosphate with renewable feedstocks or developing recovery and recycling systems that can reclaim it from finished goods or production scrap. Even on a tight budget, plants can look into solvent recovery units or choose suppliers willing to take waste streams back for reprocessing.
Still, the search for true drop-in replacements continues. Some newer plasticizers made from citrates or adipates enter the market billed as “greener,” but they don’t always measure up in processability or flame suppression. Triethyl phosphate keeps its edge by being a known quantity—with decades of in-depth research backing its safety and efficacy profile. Solutions aren’t always about switching products, but about improving education, optimizing formulations, and making sure everyone down the production line understands both the strengths and limitations of the chemicals they handle.
Having spent years in and out of materials science labs and production lines, I’ve watched dozens of companies struggle with product tweaks only to come full circle to what works—and triethyl phosphate often finds its way back onto the spreadsheet. It’s never just a matter of cost; reputation, long-term durability, and the ability to meet increasingly strict standards carry real weight. Choosing a grade that comes with robust documentation, reliable analysis certificates, and accessible technical support always pays back, especially if troubleshooting arises down the road.
For anyone developing or refining products in plastics, fire safety, or specialty synthesis, the difference between a good grade and a questionable one often shows up in the finished product months or years after the first batch. Cutting corners on sourcing or process controls sometimes feels like short-term savings, but it’s the customer complaints, recalls, or reputational hits that linger. Triethyl phosphate may not have the same fame or commercial buzz as some newer specialty chemicals, but it earns its place through steady results and a track record of keeping pace with changing industry needs. Experience—and a good read of technical literature—bears that out.
Triethyl phosphate sets itself apart through its adaptability, safety profile, and reliable results. Its use in flame retardancy, plasticizing, and synthesis supports a huge range of industries from consumer goods to high-performance materials. Long-term trends suggest its role will continue shifting toward environmentally conscious applications and advanced composites. Environmental transparency, a clean supply chain record, and solid technical support all matter when picking a supplier. In a field where regulatory pressure and customer expectations keep marching forward, products like triethyl phosphate stand out for doing the job—quietly, safely, and with less drama than most.