|
HS Code |
157395 |
| Cas Number | 108-18-9 |
| Iupac Name | N-iso-propylpropan-2-amine |
| Molecular Formula | C6H15N |
| Molar Mass | 101.19 g/mol |
| Appearance | Colorless liquid |
| Odor | Ammonia-like |
| Boiling Point | 83–85 °C |
| Melting Point | -60 °C |
| Density | 0.722 g/cm³ at 20 °C |
| Solubility In Water | Slightly soluble |
| Vapor Pressure | 108 mmHg at 25 °C |
| Refractive Index | 1.387 (20 °C) |
| Flash Point | -10 °C (Closed cup) |
| Autoignition Temperature | 350 °C |
| Pubchem Cid | 7963 |
As an accredited Diisopropylamine factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Diisopropylamine is packaged in a 2.5 L amber glass bottle, featuring a secure screw cap and hazard labeling for safe handling. |
| Shipping | Diisopropylamine is shipped in tightly sealed, chemical-resistant containers such as steel drums or bottles to prevent leaks and contamination. It must be transported as a flammable liquid, away from sources of ignition, oxidizers, and acids. Proper labeling, compliance with DOT and international regulations, and MSDS documentation are required. |
| Storage | Diisopropylamine should be stored in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area, away from sources of ignition, acids, oxidizing agents, and moisture. Keep the container tightly closed and protected from physical damage. Store under an inert atmosphere, such as nitrogen, if possible. Use only in chemical fume hoods and ensure proper labeling and compatibility with other stored chemicals. |
|
Purity 99%: Diisopropylamine purity 99% is used in pharmaceutical intermediate synthesis, where high product yield and minimal impurities are ensured. Boiling point 84°C: Diisopropylamine boiling point 84°C is used in organic solvent recovery systems, where efficient solvent separation is achieved. Low water content <0.1%: Diisopropylamine low water content <0.1% is used in agrochemical formulation, where hydrolysis of active ingredients is minimized. Density 0.72 g/cm³: Diisopropylamine density 0.72 g/cm³ is used in rubber accelerator production, where uniform mixing and reactivity are optimized. Molecular weight 101.19 g/mol: Diisopropylamine molecular weight 101.19 g/mol is used in epoxy resin catalysts, where predictable stoichiometry and cure rates are attained. Stability up to 40°C: Diisopropylamine stability up to 40°C is used in storage and transport of chemical reagents, where safe handling and minimized decomposition are supported. Refractive index 1.387: Diisopropylamine refractive index 1.387 is used in analytical standard preparations, where precise compound identification is enhanced. Flash point 11°C: Diisopropylamine flash point 11°C is used in controlled reaction environments, where risk of ignition is strictly managed. Assay ≥99.5%: Diisopropylamine assay ≥99.5% is used in lithium battery electrolyte additives, where consistent electrochemical performance is delivered. |
Competitive Diisopropylamine prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to admin@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: admin@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
If you spend any time in a lab or work with organic synthesis, diisopropylamine stands out as one of those compounds that keeps showing up in practical applications. This secondary amine, with a formula of C6H15N, tends to offer just enough steric bulk to make it valuable where selectivity actually matters. The nature of its branched isopropyl groups confers a volatility and solvent compatibility that makes life easier for anyone tired of clogging up glassware.
In organic chemistry, different amines bring their own quirks, but diisopropylamine gets picked for more than just its reactivity. I've watched colleagues gravitate toward it in situations where tert-butylamine or triethylamine just refuse to stay out of the way or bring too much basicity. Often, labs use diisopropylamine to prepare lithium diisopropylamide (LDA), one of the go-to bases when looking for strong, non-nucleophilic conditions—a necessity for preparing enolates or pulling off tricky deprotonations without side reactions.
You see, some amines like monoethylamine tend to react where you don’t want them. Others, such as diethylamine, aren’t bulky enough and wind up less selective. In contrast, diisopropylamine’s structure helps keep it less nucleophilic than most, sparing precious reactants from unwanted substitutions. It holds onto protons in just the right way, but not so tightly that you sacrifice reactivity in routine processes.
The real value of diisopropylamine comes into focus outside the confines of synthesis, too. Whether in the agrochemical world or pharmaceuticals, its use extends toward practical tasks that hinge on achieving selectivity and mild conditions. Modern crop science, for instance, often requires intermediates resilient enough to avoid side reactions yet agile in forming precise molecular connections. That’s where diisopropylamine’s reliability makes a difference. Not only does it act as a reactant in amide and imine formation, but it has also found a home in the formulation of corrosion inhibitors and rubber accelerators.
Take my own experience from an internship in a pharmaceutical facility: our process chemist chose diisopropylamine over dimethylamine for the synthesis of an active pharmaceutical ingredient. The main reason boiled down to avoiding over-alkylation. One misstep, and the compound’s efficacy plummeted, not to mention the regulatory headaches. Choosing diisopropylamine cut back on byproducts, improved the purity profile, and, in the end, trimmed down the time spent on purification.
Chemists care about handling and operational ease, and diisopropylamine’s liquid state at room temperature means storage, dispensing, and mixing don’t demand extra effort. Volatility can bring both benefits and pitfalls. A low boiling point offers quick cleanups and ease of removal—but leaves the user with a strong, sometimes unpleasant, amine odor. That can be mitigated with a functioning fume hood, and the lower density compared to water makes phase separation more straightforward than some heavier amines could ever hope to allow.
People sometimes assume “an amine is an amine,” yet the differences in structure resonate strongly through reactivity. Triethylamine, for instance, crowds the reaction with slightly more nucleophilicity, increasing the risk of off-target bonding. Diisopropylamine holds back, thanks to its larger substituents. For the formation of sensitive intermediates—like in the generation of enolates or as part of various condensation reactions—this unique combination allows reactions to stay controlled, steering clear of unwanted pathways.
But selection isn’t just about chemistry. Handling makes a difference in the real world. Compared to more volatile amines, diisopropylamine still brings a manageable flashpoint, meaning storage and transport protocols don’t require the most restrictive controls, though users must always remain vigilant about personal protective equipment and ventilation.
Practicing chemists appreciate that every reagent makes its mark on reaction scalability. Large-scale synthesis in industrial contexts benefits from consistency, and diisopropylamine’s stability stands out. In the hands of seasoned process engineers, the compound’s reactivity profile minimizes the need for extensive downstream purification. Production facilities working under current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) regulations value every minute saved by using reagents that help keep reactions simple.
During graduate school, we often debated reagent selection with the goal of balancing cost, safety, and efficiency. Diisopropylamine sometimes cost a bit more than bulkier or simpler amines, but the expense balanced out through fewer failed batches and a reduction in the time spent fixing mistakes. The reliability of the results paid back the upfront investment, which every instructor and lab manager understood thoroughly.
No chemical comes entirely free of problems, and diisopropylamine poses certain occupational health risks. The odor alone signals a strong, volatile amine, demanding careful handling. Respiratory protection and solid fume hoods aren’t just a recommendation—they’re a requirement, especially when scaling operations. Organizations that overlook these basics often end up with workplace complaints or, worse, lost work hours.
Long-term storage presents another regular pain point. Diisopropylamine can absorb moisture from the air, which may introduce water into moisture-sensitive reactions. Storing the compound in tightly sealed containers—preferably under an inert gas like nitrogen—keeps it ready for precision work. This isn’t unique to diisopropylamine, but the consequences show up more readily in LDA preparations, where moisture spoils the base’s intended punch.
Growing scrutiny of chemical processes means environmental impact matters. Diisopropylamine does not rank among the most hazardous chemicals, but as a volatile organic compound (VOC), it can contribute to air emissions if improperly managed. Smart labs and responsible factories employ abatement systems designed for amine vapors, helping keep workspaces—and the surrounding community—safe.
Strong waste management policies help, too. Chemical companies juggle the demands of local and international regulations. Proper disposal of amine residues and solvent mixtures avoids the environmental headaches and hefty fines waiting for those who get lazy with documentation.
One of the less talked-about topics is the potential for downstream contamination if diisopropylamine finds its way into water systems. Routine monitoring and secondary containment—along with employee training—reduce the odds of spills. Experienced lab staff recognize these imperatives as more than just legal boxes to check; it’s about keeping work and living spaces clean.
The frontier of chemical synthesis never sleeps. Some researchers now trial replacements for conventional amines because environmental guidance grows tighter every year. Yet for all the hand-wringing over new regulations, diisopropylamine has held its ground. That persistence flows from a profile that offers high utility without excess risk. Alternatives such as more exotic amines promise lower odor or improved yield, but they lack broad availability or cost far more, limiting uptake.
For now, the chemical industry has focused on making the sourcing and handling of diisopropylamine safer and more efficient, rather than replacing it outright. Upskilling employees to run modern analytical equipment, instituting real-time vapor monitoring, and reinforcing best storage practices offer more immediate improvements than an untested substitute.
What’s surprising to many is how diisopropylamine’s reach extends beyond the synthesis plant or laboratory. Though the pure compound never lands on a supermarket shelf, many common products in agriculture, coatings, and specialty chemicals trace their lineage to processes supported by this amine. Herbicides, pesticides, and certain pharmaceutical intermediates all reflect a chemistry built around high-value, pure starting materials.
The way diisopropylamine behaves during reactions helps fine-tune products for better shelf life, efficacy, or lower unwanted residues. For example, controlled use in synthesizing APIs means medicines reach the consumer with minimal side effects and higher therapeutic value. In bulk applications, the reliability factor cuts down extractable impurities, improving the profile for users down the line.
Data from specialty chemical outlets and manufacturer disclosures paint a clear picture: demand for diisopropylamine climbed steadily through the last decade, as fine chemical producers favored versatility and reliability in the lab. Usage data sourced from market research groups show its consumption concentrated in North America, Western Europe, and East Asia, aligning with the regions housing the world’s most active pharmaceutical and agrochemical research clusters.
Regulatory filings and import-export statistics indicate that most of the global supply comes from large-volume producers with decades of operational experience. This track record matches the low frequency of serious incidents associated with diisopropylamine shipments, a testament to the industry’s collective learning curve in handling volatile amines responsibly.
Anyone who’s run a glovebox overnight during a busy week ends up with a strong opinion about which reagents truly work. Diisopropylamine, to me, fits the camp of “quiet workhorse.” In an academic research environment, having access to it meant being able to push through synthetic routes that needed a base with strength but not aggression. It gave us reproducibility in reactions that relied on the physical separation of products—nothing worse than going through four columns because an amine doubled as a nucleophile one step too soon.
Colleagues across pharma process development shared similar themes: Diisopropylamine let them replace bases that caused excessive side reactions or left the overall process less reproducible. Lab techs and scale-up teams often find it preferable to triethylamine when trying to avoid ammonium salt build-up during washing or workup.
A few years ago, we worked with a production site considering a switch to alternative bases, hoping to drive down odor and reduce handling restrictions. The economics and training costs soon convinced management otherwise. The clean track record with diisopropylamine, combined with routine safety investments, kept it in service.
Nothing beats regular training in proper handling. Most incidents traced back to a simple lapse in using gloves or skipping a vapor mask at the end of a long shift. Facilities investing in recurring safety workshops keep their incident rates low and workforce healthier. Smart design in storage—steel or HDPE drums with nitrogen purging, clear labeling, and secondary containment—secures the compound against spills and accidental mixing.
On the process side, implementing closed transfer systems cuts down vapor exposure, raises yield, and lessens workplace complaints about odor. Facilities that loop chemists and engineers into equipment decisions end up with processes that transmit best practice from the desk chemist to the plant operator. Where cleanroom protocols extend, hazard controls improve. Routine monitoring for trace amine vapors in the air brings any potential failures to light before health complaints arise.
The environmental side isn’t left out. A comprehensive waste management protocol, including solvent recovery and activated carbon filters for exhaust streams, keeps a lab or plant compliant while supporting sustainability initiatives. Many companies have begun regulatory evaluations for new projects, incorporating life-cycle assessments at the earliest stages. This predictive approach—rather than simply reacting to audits—has proven its value in both compliance and cost overruns.
The future of amine chemistry looks poised for gradual change, pushed along by continued environmental oversight and worker safety demands. Diisopropylamine’s ongoing role depends on how well companies and users adjust their protocols, move toward greener manufacturing, and keep worker expertise current. For all the buzz about “next generation” reagents, tried-and-tested compounds offer consistency and a body of knowledge that new substances struggle to match.
Chemistry teachers, lab managers, and industry professionals keep returning to diisopropylamine for its intersection of reliability, safety features, and broad reactivity range. They know what to expect and have a collective playbook for issues that arise. Newer options may find their moment, but for now, diisopropylamine retains a presence—and reputation—that’s hard to improve upon.