|
HS Code |
972751 |
| Chemical Name | Perfluorooctanoic Acid |
| Abbreviation | PFOA |
| Cas Number | 335-67-1 |
| Molecular Formula | C8HF15O2 |
| Molar Mass | 414.07 g/mol |
| Appearance | White powder or waxy solid |
| Melting Point | 40-50 °C |
| Boiling Point | 189 °C (decomposes) |
| Solubility In Water | 3.4 g/L at 25 °C |
| Density | 1.8 g/cm3 |
| Odor | Odorless |
As an accredited Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | White, high-density polyethylene bottle containing 100 grams of Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA); tightly sealed, labeled with hazard and handling information. |
| Shipping | Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) must be shipped as a hazardous material, following strict regulatory guidelines. It should be packed in tightly sealed, corrosion-resistant containers with proper hazard labeling. Transport requires approved documentation, adherence to relevant local and international regulations, and precautions to prevent leaks, spills, or environmental contamination during handling and transit. |
| Storage | Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) should be stored in tightly sealed containers made of compatible materials, such as glass or certain plastics, to prevent contamination and chemical degradation. Store in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area away from sources of heat, ignition, and incompatible substances. Clearly label containers and use secondary containment to prevent leaks or spills, following local regulatory requirements for hazardous chemicals. |
|
Purity 98%: Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) with purity 98% is used in the production of fluoropolymer resins, where it ensures high chemical stability and enhanced polymer properties. Molecular weight 414.07 g/mol: Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) with molecular weight 414.07 g/mol is used in surfactant formulations for emulsification processes, where it provides uniform particle dispersion. Solubility in water 9.5 g/L: Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) with solubility in water 9.5 g/L is used in aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) production, where it promotes effective fire suppression performance. Melting point 40–50°C: Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) with a melting point of 40–50°C is used in the synthesis of protective coatings, where it imparts outstanding thermal resistance. Particle size <10 µm: Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) with particle size less than 10 µm is used in the manufacture of microporous membranes, where it improves membrane uniformity and filtration efficiency. Boiling point 189°C: Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) with a boiling point of 189°C is used as a processing aid in high-temperature polymerization reactions, where it maintains molecular integrity under heat. Thermal stability up to 250°C: Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) with thermal stability up to 250°C is used in gasket fabrication, where it ensures sustained mechanical performance at elevated temperatures. Acidity (pKa) 2.8: Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) with pKa of 2.8 is used in catalyst manufacturing, where it enhances the selectivity and efficiency of acidic catalytic systems. |
Competitive Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to admin@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: admin@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Perfluorooctanoic acid, commonly abbreviated as PFOA, stands out as a synthetic chemical that has fueled innovation in industrial manufacturing for decades. Recognized by its linear eight-carbon backbone and a string of fluorine atoms, PFOA shows up in the supply chain for products that demand water, oil, and stain resistance. Chemists refer to its molecular formula as C8HF15O2, a detail that tells a story of strong carbon-fluorine bonds, which give PFOA its unique chemical resilience.
Anyone who’s worn waterproof clothing or used a nonstick frying pan has likely benefitted from technology shaped by PFOA. My own experience working alongside engineers in the coatings industry revealed just how widely treasured this compound once was. Many applications relied on that stable chain of fluorines for reliability under high temperatures and against stubborn stains. This endurance set PFOA apart from other surfactants and process aids.
PFOA emerges most frequently in the form of a white powder or sometimes as a viscous liquid, depending on the processing route. Chemists use it in its ammonium salt (APFO) form to improve solubility and handling. In factories, PFOA finds roles as a surfactant and processing aid, especially in the manufacture of fluoropolymers like PTFE, which is best known by the brand name Teflon. Specifications often focus on purity, particle size if using a solid form, and the presence of residual impurities such as other perfluorinated substances.
The differences between one batch and another may seem subtle, but in practice, the choice depends on the customers' technical needs. Industrial grades of PFOA typically promise above 97% purity, maintaining minimal water content and low levels of potentially interfering byproducts. Technical teams in the field tend to value high consistency and documented production lots because trace impurities aggravate equipment and can affect polymerization results.
I once sat in on a meeting at a polymer research lab where a faulty batch of processing aid set back development on a new wire coating by months, illustrating how even minor variations can ripple out, adding cost and delay. Reliable sourcing isn’t just a paperwork demand — it’s key to maintaining uptime and product quality.
Once PFOA’s reputation for stubbornness outstripped almost every ingredient in surfactant chemistry, manufacturers leaned into its benefits. You’d find its fingerprints across stainproof carpets, food-contact papers, and firefighting foams. In my time consulting for textile manufacturers, the push for durable repellency coatings frequently meant weighing cost, speed, and regulatory issues. PFOA’s ease of integration slashed cycle times — a big deal for businesses chasing tight deadlines.
There’s an old saying among factory hands: “If it works, keep it.” Many felt that way about PFOA. Its unique structure presents a low surface energy, which helps finishes spread thin and even. The fluorine atoms repel both water and grease, making it a linchpin ingredient for stains that just don’t stick. It acts as a molecular shield, keeping dirt outside and extending the life of products, whether upholstery or rain jackets.
The rise of PFOA also turned up in places people rarely consider, from photolithography in electronics manufacturing to gaskets and O-rings that face daily doses of corrosive chemicals. These parts shrug off stress in ways other materials can’t manage. Versatility and resistance ruled — but these same features set up a dark side that industrial chemists and environmental scientists debate to this day.
Stack PFOA next to traditional hydrocarbon surfactants, and you spot the difference straight away. Where hydrocarbons break down over time, opening the door for weather, bacteria, or sunlight to do their worst, PFOA holds firm. Those carbon-fluorine bonds sit among the strongest in chemistry—breaking them isn’t easy. This difference explains why PFOA-powered goods often last longer and withstand harsher environments.
Compared to other perfluorinated compounds, PFOA’s size and chemical properties made it popular, but not unique. Its close cousins, such as PFOS (perfluorooctane sulfonate), share a baseline of environmental persistence, but the subtle differences in acid and sulfonate groups drive performance in polymerization and surface treatment applications. I remember a project that required swapping PFOA with a shorter-chain alternative. The shorter chain struggled to match the durability and spread of PFOA, but pressure from regulators forced the change.
Traditional surfactants — think sodium lauryl sulfate in shampoos, for example — simply can't compete with PFOA in industrial settings where extreme heat or caustic chemicals attack chemical bonds. That's why many applications simply couldn’t flip to common surfactants without sacrificing product longevity or worker safety.
No discussion about PFOA finds its footing without facing its risks. I’ve seen both sides of this debate play out in conference halls and regulatory hearings. On one hand, workers want reliable materials. On the other, communities and health advocates point out that PFOA doesn’t easily leave water, land, or living tissue. Its tendency to bioaccumulate and stick around makes it a persistent organic pollutant—a term carrying real consequences for future generations.
Scientific studies, from government agencies and independent researchers alike, have linked PFOA exposure to a slate of health issues. Analytical chemists have tracked PFOA in drinking water, soil, and even umbilical cord blood. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, European Chemicals Agency, and other watchdog groups have classified PFOA as an emerging contaminant to monitor and, increasingly, regulate. In the lab, this meant chasing ever-lower detection limits as legislators set stricter standards.
Production plants found themselves facing new waste stream management costs as rules tightened. Filtration, incineration, and capture processes rack up expenses, and manufacturing leaders must factor these into their bottom line. The chemical’s stability, which helped so many products perform flawlessly, makes it a stubborn pollutant in the wild — a double-edged sword that colors business strategies and personal ethics.
No one likes bad press, and the negative attention on PFOA drove chemical companies to act. Most large producers have phased out PFOA use voluntarily or in anticipation of tighter laws. Alternatives, including shorter-chain perfluorinated acids and entirely new classes of processing aids, are entering the market. Some of these new chemicals, though less persistent according to current studies, bring new trade-offs, including cost and unknown health profiles.
Over the last decade, researchers in polymer chemistry circles increasingly focused on non-fluorinated process aids. Academic labs and startup ventures pooled knowledge to trial materials based on siloxanes, biodegradable surfactants, and biobased polymers. The story isn’t a simple switch. While some applications now run well with alternatives, others fail to meet the tough requirements for nonstick, temperature resistance, or chemical resilience.
I recall a pilot plant manager frustrated by the need to keep old, PFOA-compatible processes online, just to support legacy orders that alternative chemistries couldn’t touch. Customers can be slow to pivot, especially in industries such as aerospace, medical devices, and electronics. The stakes run high, as performance shortfalls translate into safety concerns, callbacks, or warranty claims.
Authorities across the globe have approached PFOA regulation with wide variability. The United States has set increasingly tough guidelines for drinking water and industrial discharge, while the European Union categorizes PFOA as a Substance of Very High Concern under REACH legislation. Asian markets move at their own pace, often in reaction to outside pressure or as exporters’ demands shift.
For years, manufacturers asked for clear rules and timelines. I’ve seen legal teams huddle alongside technical staff to interpret ambiguous guidance, balancing compliance costs with keeping the lights on. It’s more than bureaucracy — these choices shape jobs, community health, and the direction of innovation.
Some chemical plants invested in on-site monitoring to track PFOA levels in air and water discharges, even beyond what’s required. Early adopters of these systems discovered leaks and emissions earlier, dodging legal penalties and building trust among workers and neighbors. This approach brought real human benefits, not just paperwork.
Solving the challenges associated with PFOA takes more than product swaps. It requires a bottom-up evaluation of every step, from raw materials to final goods. In my work with cross-functional teams, the most lasting gains came from collaborative problem-solving. Engineers, chemists, supply chain managers, and frontline workers bring different perspectives, each crucial in designing safer and more reliable systems.
Ditching PFOA isn’t about demonizing the past, but about designing better processes for the future. Investing in research around safer chemistries doesn’t just benefit industry; it protects public health and the environment. I’ve witnessed pilot projects where upstream process modifications slashed reliance on perfluorinated substances and let companies stand out in a crowded marketplace by earning green certifications.
Job retraining and technical education play an unsung role here. As companies shift away from PFOA, workers need new skills. My time in workforce development meetings made it clear that hands-on education, supported by real career incentives, helps smooth the transition toward greener chemistries. Experience on the plant floor often ignites the most creative problem-solving, since those closest to the process see hurdles and opportunities up close.
This story extends beyond factory gates. Community engagement matters. Local governments and advocacy groups who open doors to discussion foster trust and keep companies accountable. In regions grappling with historical contamination, transparent communication about testing, remediation, and exposure risk creates space for solutions and fair outcomes.
I joined one forum where residents, scientists, and local officials traded concerns and updates about groundwater clean-up. These meetings could get tense, but mutual respect and a focus on actionable steps — from bottled water delivery to soil testing — kept progress moving. The lesson is clear: success depends on honesty, humility, and a willingness to adapt as new evidence comes in.
As the industry shifts, PFOA stands as both a cautionary tale and a technical achievement. Its tough, fluorine-rich structure unlocked decades of progress but also left a mark on people and planet. The conversation around PFOA continues to evolve, shaped by new scientific findings, technological breakthroughs, and lessons from the field.
Future chemists and engineers will keep tackling these issues, guided by a mix of experience, ethics, and creativity. Companies that invest in safer materials, transparent practices, and continual improvement can break new ground and restore public confidence. Products built with less hazardous substances gain a competitive edge, not just in regulatory compliance but in winning customer trust. ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) investing, which evaluates companies on more than just profit, now shapes capital flows and boardroom decisions.
Perfluorooctanoic acid’s story mirrors the tension between progress and responsibility. As someone who’s watched industry pivot in real time, I believe honest discussion and concerted action chart the best way forward. Embracing new research, honoring community concerns, and retraining workers for a new era aren’t optional extras. These steps, built on a foundation of experience and ongoing learning, form the backbone of a safer, more sustainable industrial future that benefits everyone.