|
HS Code |
249999 |
| Cas Number | 16135-58-3 |
| Molecular Formula | C5H8O4 |
| Molecular Weight | 132.12 g/mol |
| Iupac Name | Methyl succinate |
| Appearance | Colorless liquid |
| Boiling Point | 196-198 °C |
| Melting Point | -20 °C |
| Density | 1.17 g/cm3 |
| Solubility In Water | Moderately soluble |
| Refractive Index | 1.419 |
As an accredited Monomethyl Succinate factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Monomethyl Succinate is packaged in a 500g amber glass bottle with a tamper-evident cap and chemical safety labeling. |
| Shipping | Monomethyl Succinate is typically shipped in tightly sealed containers, such as drums or bottles, to prevent moisture absorption and contamination. It should be transported in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area, away from incompatible substances. Standard regulations for non-hazardous chemicals generally apply unless otherwise specified by local or international shipping guidelines. |
| Storage | Monomethyl Succinate should be stored in a tightly closed container in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area, away from incompatible substances such as strong oxidizing agents. It should be protected from heat, moisture, and direct sunlight. Ensure proper labeling and keep away from sources of ignition. Follow standard chemical safety practices and local regulations for storage and handling. |
|
Purity 99%: Monomethyl Succinate with purity 99% is used in pharmaceutical intermediate synthesis, where high purity ensures minimal byproduct formation. Molecular weight 132.13 g/mol: Monomethyl Succinate with molecular weight 132.13 g/mol is used in flavor and fragrance formulation, where accurate dosing guarantees consistent sensory profiles. Melting point 119°C: Monomethyl Succinate with a melting point of 119°C is used in specialty resin manufacturing, where controlled melting behavior enhances processing efficiency. Stability temperature 80°C: Monomethyl Succinate with stability up to 80°C is used in waterborne coating systems, where thermal stability prevents premature degradation. Particle size <100 µm: Monomethyl Succinate with particle size less than 100 µm is used in fine chemical blending, where uniform particle distribution optimizes homogeneity. Viscosity grade low: Monomethyl Succinate with low viscosity grade is used in biodegradable plasticizer production, where low viscosity facilitates efficient compounding. Water content <0.5%: Monomethyl Succinate with water content below 0.5% is used in catalyst preparation, where reduced moisture content improves catalyst activity. Assay ≥98%: Monomethyl Succinate with assay ≥98% is used in agrochemical formulation, where high assay ensures product potency and reliability. Color APHA ≤20: Monomethyl Succinate with color APHA ≤20 is used in personal care ingredient production, where low color values maintain product appearance standards. Residual solvent <50 ppm: Monomethyl Succinate with residual solvent content below 50 ppm is used in electronics cleaning agents, where low residue guarantees device safety and performance. |
Competitive Monomethyl Succinate prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to admin@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: admin@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
The chemical landscape shifts fast, but some niche products quietly transform entire industries. Monomethyl succinate falls into this category—a compound that once stayed tucked in thick binders of specialty chemicals but now pops up more often in conversations about greener manufacturing and innovative synthesis. My own experience working alongside R&D chemists exposed how one choice of intermediate can turn a painstaking process into an efficient one. Over the last decade, interest in monomethyl succinate snowballed, not just in pharmaceutical plants, but in plastics, coatings, fragrances, and even agriculture.
Let’s break down what makes monomethyl succinate stand out. It’s a monoester derived from succinic acid, typically appearing as a colorless, low-odor liquid. While chemical structures might look similar on paper, subtle changes like adding one methyl group can lead to a fresh mix of properties. In the laboratory, it gets known as a reliable, straightforward building block, especially where clean reaction profiles matter. The compound usually shows up in high purity, which matters for reproducibility. The model most recognized in industry labs is the C5H8O4 variant, boasting a molecular weight around 132.1 and a boiling point just over 200 degrees Celsius. In my line of work, technicians have appreciated how this ester remains easy to measure and handle—not prone to caking, and it stores well with minimal fuss.
Product developers and formulation chemists keep returning to monomethyl succinate for a reason. Once, I toured a mid-sized European ingredients supplier wrestling with sluggish batch processes. They needed an intermediate that didn’t throw side reactions or by-products into the mix. Their engineers pivoted to monomethyl succinate, cutting purification steps while keeping total yields high. In coatings, this ingredient works well as a raw material, contributing to polyester resins that offer just the right flexibility and durability for specialty paints. The fine-tuning of physical properties becomes possible thanks to that methyl group, which nudges the polymer backbone away from brittleness. These details get lost in marketing gloss, but I’ve seen lab techs migrate toward the compound precisely because it helps avoid costly downtime.
The compound’s popularity also flourishes in pharmaceutical synthesis. Its structure opens up reliable reaction paths toward active molecules and their key intermediates. Where many carboxylic acid derivatives would lead to overreaction or resin formation, monomethyl succinate brings just enough reactivity to move substrates along the conveyor belt of organic synthesis without producing the tarry by-products. Several pain-reliever analogs and anti-inflammatory agents find the compound invaluable at the early synthesis stage. Over the years, regulatory agencies have paid close attention to chemical purity, and monomethyl succinate’s availability in high-purity grades helps meet these evolving standards.
It’s easy to wonder whether there’s much real distinction between monomethyl succinate and its chemical cousins, such as dimethyl succinate or the unmodified diacid. But dig beneath the surface, and differences become pretty clear. Dimethyl succinate, for example, sports two ester groups, which can push some reactions too far, producing more volatile by-products that complicate downstream separation. Succinic acid, with two available carboxyl groups, introduces too much acidity for applications demanding milder conditions. By using only a single methyl group, monomethyl succinate delivers a balance—enough reactivity where it counts but none of the unwelcome side products.
The agricultural sector highlights another set of differences. Precision and predictability matter in everything from pest control agents to specialty fertilizers. Because monomethyl succinate offers a stable, non-hygroscopic alternative to other esters, it slots neatly into controlled-release formulations. When collaborating with an agriscience team refining root growth stimulants, we struggled with inconsistent results using alternate esters. Switching to monomethyl succinate gave us sharper results batch to batch, which matters when growers are staking income on predictable performance in the field.
Green chemistry pulls more weight than just a catchphrase—it’s a core challenge for everyone in the manufacturing and specialty chemical space. Over the past few years, monomethyl succinate has followed the broader trend toward bio-based feedstocks. Decades ago, petroleum-based processes dominated its production, but today, a significant portion comes from bio-fermentation routes. That change didn’t happen overnight; it grew out of consumer pressure and tighter environmental regulations.
Translating those green goals into real-world outcomes, factories using monomethyl succinate now often see lower energy demands and reduced solvent waste during synthesis. It surprised me the first time a factory collation report flagged a measurable drop in wastewater contaminants traced to this one switch. Those kinds of small operational tweaks form the backbone of industry-wide sustainability gains. As life cycle analysis becomes the rule, not the exception, tracking emissions from intermediate chemicals—including monomethyl succinate—sets a benchmark for responsible production.
It helps to hear from those who’ve handled the compound outside the glare of the sales floor. Line operators tell me the low volatility means less airborne nuisance during mixing; it holds its stability in both open and closed reactors, easing containment worries. Compared to alternatives, clean-up after spills takes less time, partly because of its physical properties and partly because its low odor minimizes workplace complaints. I’ve stood in chemical manufacturing suites, and nothing sours employee morale faster than a persistent, acrid chemical stench.
Lab staff appreciate the compound’s solid reactivity profile. Many organic reactions depend on a sweet spot—too reactive, and you lose control; too bland, and you slog through sluggish conversion rates. Monomethyl succinate threads that needle, serving as a productive partner for catalysts but giving technicians enough breathing room to manage temperature and pressure swings. I learned early that its shelf-life doesn’t suffer unduly in the face of ordinary humidity and heat, a trait that simplifies inventory management for both small pilot plants and bulk operations.
Beyond paints, polymers, and drugs, monomethyl succinate stands out in some less obvious applications. Fragrance developers use it as a building block for sustainable musk and green notes, while specialty food chemists experiment with its potential as a flavor precursor. Certain pH-buffered cleaning solutions use monomethyl succinate to balance acidity without driving up regulatory compliance costs. Its unobtrusive profile appeals to industries where every ingredient faces intense scrutiny.
At one time, I worked with a team brainstorming new biodegradable packaging alternatives. We considered a slew of intermediates, each with rumored performance perks. After months of trials, monomethyl succinate’s mild reactivity and low migration risk helped us deliver food-agreeable barriers that neither tainted nor degraded the product inside. In a market where safety claims come under the microscope, the clarity of monomethyl succinate’s supply chain and traceability made it easier to qualify formulations through regulatory audits.
Quality assurance teams chase two goals: trusted sourcing and repeatable results. The supply network for specialty chemicals can sometimes feel maze-like, with raw materials coming from across the globe. During a facility expansion in Southeast Asia, I watched colleagues scrutinize suppliers to ensure monomethyl succinate arrived with the same purity and batch-to-batch identity as samples from European sources. Differences in quality manifest as lost yield or gelled reactors, problems that eat up resources and time, so it shouldn’t surprise anyone that serious buyers gravitate to verified suppliers with transparent documentation and batch records.
The industry as a whole has responded by tightening up protocols. Standardized purity checks, advanced chromatography, and detailed certificates of analysis now accompany most shipments. I’ve worked with audit teams verifying trace impurities fall well below regulatory limits, an effort made easier because monomethyl succinate’s synthesis path naturally leaves behind fewer stubborn contaminants.
Pricing in the specialty chemicals world ebbs and flows, riding on waves of raw material shifts, energy costs, and geopolitics. Ten years ago, monomethyl succinate fetched a premium, holding back broader adoption. As economies of scale kicked in, the cost curve bent downward. The rise of bio-based production further stabilized supply, keeping prices right in line with comparable esters. During a procurement review for an industrial plant retrofit, the cost-justification exercise balanced the compound’s upfront price against process efficiencies. The numbers often worked out favorably, as reduced side reactions and less need for downstream purification led to measurable gains on the bottom line.
Small and mid-size manufacturers used to worry about availability if their usual supplier ran into trouble. Broader acceptance of monomethyl succinate as a standard feedstock has brought more players into the market, improving supply chain resilience. That’s a shift—five years ago, a supply disruption could ripple through months of lost output. Production networks today can pivot to alternate sources faster, shrinking risks associated with sourcing delays.
Safety expectations have never been tighter, with oversight agencies circling closer and companies prioritizing worker health. Monomethyl succinate lines up favorably in these areas. Its low acute toxicity and moderate flash point mean manufacturers don’t scramble for exotic protective gear or build special ventilation just to keep exposure within safe limits. Training new hires to handle the compound doesn’t turn into a weeks-long exercise; most operators see it as just another liquid to decant and pump.
The lower inhalation risk comes from both its chemical structure and its handling profile. Over the years, plant safety statistics have shown that monomethyl succinate contributes far fewer lost-time incidents linked to skin or inhalation exposure than other common esters. At a safety review in a US facility, testimonials from shop-floor supervisors painted a clear picture—integrating monomethyl succinate helped drive down complaint logs and improved overall air quality.
Industries that push technical limits—battery makers, advanced composites, specialty adhesives—keep searching for safer, cleaner intermediates. Monomethyl succinate meets that demand with a blend of predictability and flexibility that outclasses some incumbents. In battery chemistry, for instance, it contributes to experimental electrolytes that demand precise, stable intermediates. Adhesive formulators value its performance under a range of humidity and stress conditions; it won’t readily hydrolyze or give off errant fumes in high-temperature curing environments.
These characteristics don’t just impact what happens inside the factory. Product warranties and customer trust depend on invisible, but crucial, decisions about all ingredients along the production chain. In one case, a global electronics supplier I worked with flagged recurring delamination in their high-value device casings. After revisiting their recipe and moving to monomethyl succinate-based intermediates, warranty claims took a noticeable dip, demonstrating how a single upstream choice pays off all the way to end-users.
More manufacturers look to the future, rethinking everything from carbon footprints to the traceability of each chemical touchpoint. Monomethyl succinate seems poised to keep growing as a trusted staple for those trying to build products that meet not just today’s performance tests, but also tomorrow’s regulatory and environmental standards.
Cross-sector collaborations are already underway. Companies experiment with blending renewable monomethyl succinate into biobased plastics, driving the shift away from fossil-derived feedstocks. Start-ups in the wellness, beauty, and food ingredient spaces recognize the value of ingredients with traceable, transparent supply chains—an arena where monomethyl succinate checks off consumer demands for safety and sustainability, while meeting the real-world needs of production managers and R&D teams.
No chemical product rides a perfectly smooth road. Challenges remain, especially when adapting monomethyl succinate for highly regulated sectors or where extreme purity levels push analytical labs to their limits. Some new applications push the material into service conditions it wasn’t designed for, revealing the need for ongoing research and field validation.
As the focus sharpens on circular chemistry, expectations for bio-derived intermediates will rise, and producers must maintain clear documentation and environmental responsibility. Collaboration between suppliers, regulatory bodies, and research institutions helps smooth out knowledge gaps. More open data-sharing and cross-discipline partnerships stand to raise standards, not just for monomethyl succinate, but for every key building block in the specialty chemicals market.
In the end, what matters is that every link in the chain—from green feedstock all the way to the application—meets transparent, reliable, and science-backed benchmarks. Years of seeing projects live and die by choice of intermediate drives home the point: small, thoughtful pivots matter. Monomethyl succinate has already proven it can play a key role, and as customer needs evolve, it seems ready to meet new tests with the same quiet versatility that brought it this far.