|
HS Code |
651424 |
| Name | Chloroquine Phosphate |
| Chemical Formula | C18H26ClN3·H3PO4 |
| Molecular Weight | 515.86 g/mol |
| Appearance | White to off-white crystalline powder |
| Solubility | Freely soluble in water |
| Storage Conditions | Store at 20°C to 25°C (68°F to 77°F) |
| Pharmacological Class | Antimalarial |
| Route Of Administration | Oral |
| Cas Number | 50-63-5 |
| Mechanism Of Action | Inhibits heme polymerase activity in Plasmodium species |
| Brand Names | Aralen, Resochin |
| Indications | Treatment and prevention of malaria |
| Side Effects | Nausea, headache, blurred vision |
| Atc Code | P01BA01 |
| Tablet Strengths | 250 mg, 500 mg |
As an accredited Chloroquine Phosphate factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Chloroquine Phosphate is packaged in a white, sealed 500-gram HDPE bottle with a tamper-evident cap and clear labeling. |
| Shipping | Chloroquine Phosphate is shipped in tightly sealed, clearly labeled containers, protected from moisture and light. It is classified as non-hazardous for air, sea, and land transport under most regulations but must comply with local and international chemical shipping guidelines. Proper documentation and temperature control (ambient conditions) are adhered to during transit. |
| Storage | Chloroquine Phosphate should be stored in a tightly closed container at room temperature, typically between 15°C and 30°C (59°F–86°F), and protected from light and moisture. It should be kept away from incompatible substances, such as strong oxidizers, and stored in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated area. Keep out of reach of children and unauthorized personnel. |
|
Purity 99%: Chloroquine Phosphate Purity 99% is used in pharmaceutical formulation development, where it ensures high reproducibility and consistent therapeutic efficacy. Molecular Weight 515.86 g/mol: Chloroquine Phosphate Molecular Weight 515.86 g/mol is used in active pharmaceutical ingredient characterization, where precise molecular definition supports accurate dosing and regulatory compliance. Particle Size <10 μm: Chloroquine Phosphate Particle Size <10 μm is used in suspension injectable preparations, where fine dispersion enhances bioavailability and patient safety. Stability Temperature 25°C: Chloroquine Phosphate Stability Temperature 25°C is used in long-term storage conditions, where it maintains potency and minimizes degradation risk. Solubility in Water 50 mg/mL: Chloroquine Phosphate Solubility in Water 50 mg/mL is used in oral and parenteral solution formulations, where rapid dissolution facilitates efficient drug delivery. Melting Point 197-200°C: Chloroquine Phosphate Melting Point 197-200°C is used in manufacturing quality control, where thermal consistency ensures process reliability and product uniformity. pH Range 4.5-6.5: Chloroquine Phosphate pH Range 4.5-6.5 is used in injectable medication preparations, where pH compatibility reduces irritation and enhances patient tolerability. Loss on Drying ≤ 1%: Chloroquine Phosphate Loss on Drying ≤ 1% is used in solid dosage form production, where low moisture content prevents tablet degradation and extends shelf life. Heavy Metals <10 ppm: Chloroquine Phosphate Heavy Metals <10 ppm is used in toxicological assessments, where minimal contamination ensures product safety for end-users. Assay ≥98%: Chloroquine Phosphate Assay ≥98% is used in bulk pharmaceutical manufacturing, where high assay value guarantees active ingredient integrity in finished products. |
Competitive Chloroquine Phosphate prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to admin@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: admin@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Chloroquine phosphate has stood the test of time in healthcare, spanning decades of real-world use. Its place in the medical cabinet arrived through the fight against malaria, bringing relief in regions plagued by this parasitic infection. Before travelers discovered it as a line of defense during journeys into tropical zones, countless physicians relied on it for patients living in endemic areas. Dosage forms typically come in tablet or injectable solutions, with a straightforward profile: each formulation delivers the right amount of the active ingredient while keeping inactive components to a minimum. A simple look at the white, chalky tablets—scored for splitting—takes me back to the early days of my own work in pharmacies, where its distinctive smell always lingered around newly-opened bottles.
Unlike some of the newer antimalarials, chloroquine phosphate still occupies a unique space. Its long-standing track record gives healthcare professionals confidence backed by years of data collection, clinical observations, and hard-won experience. Choices in medicine often come down to trust, and many doctors lean on time-tested treatments when uncertainty rises. For patients brought up in places with limited healthcare infrastructure, chloroquine becomes a household name, familiar in a way that high-tech drugs struggle to match.
Malaria targets red blood cells, wreaking havoc through the natural highways of the bloodstream. Chloroquine phosphate, once present in the system, works by interfering with the parasite’s ability to process heme, a substance it needs to survive inside red blood cells. By blocking this pathway, chloroquine builds up toxic compounds within the invading organism until it can’t survive the chemical onslaught. This clever disruption remains a testament to the ingenuity of scientists working over seventy years ago.
With decades of clinical use, researchers have documented what happens after someone swallows a tablet. The medication quickly breaks down in the stomach, spreading into the bloodstream and circulating through the liver and other organs. Concentrations linger especially in tissues with high blood flow—useful for fighting an illness that does most of its damage in the blood.
My earliest encounter with chloroquine stemmed from a patient who returned from sub-Saharan Africa with the telltale fever, chills, and sweats of malaria. The protocol has remained steady for years—higher doses as an initial shock to the system, followed by a structured taper over a few days. Dosing can vary for children, the elderly, and people with certain medical histories, so individual guidance from professionals always takes priority.
Chloroquine phosphate doesn’t just fight malaria. Historically, doctors saw potential for it in autoimmune diseases such as lupus and rheumatoid arthritis, when taken for longer periods in smaller doses. Its impact on the immune system arrived fortuitously, as patients with these conditions noticed improvements unrelated to malaria. That’s how its influence moved beyond tropical medicine and into rheumatology clinics worldwide.
From where I stand, the appeal of chloroquine phosphate ties to its blend of accessibility and dependability. For a long stretch, it held the crown as the default malaria treatment, outshining quinine in both safety and convenience. Chloroquine offered a simpler dosing routine, a better tolerance profile, and less risk of dangerous heart rhythm changes. The story changed with the rise of resistant malaria strains. In some areas, the parasite learned to evade the medicine’s effects, forcing national health programs to pivot toward newer agents.
Drugs like artemisinin-based combinations have since jumped to the frontline. These newer formulations target resistant strains and promise faster results with shorter courses. Atovaquone-proguanil, another alternative, also became popular among travelers due to fewer side effects and ease of use. Mefloquine draws attention as well, although its association with neuropsychiatric effects means it often prompts questions at the pharmacy counter. Against these options, chloroquine phosphate stands out for its cost, especially in low-resource settings, where every penny counts.
Yet, no replacement has entirely erased chloroquine. In regions where resistance remains low—in some parts of Central America, the Middle East, and the Caribbean—the medicine still gets packed in suitcases and shipped in bulk for national programs. In contrast, high-burden areas across sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia shifted to newer regimens, reserving chloroquine for select cases where sensitivity to the drug persists. The existence of clear diagnostic data, reliable supply chains, and local resistance patterns often shape which product a country endorses.
Pharmaceutical standards demand precision. Chloroquine phosphate manufactured for major markets must deliver purity, potency, and stability, without the inclusion of problematic contaminants. Manufacturers rely on established pharmacopoeial standards—guidelines set by authorities who oversee medicines’ consistency. Most tablets arrive stamped with identification codes, making it easy to check for authenticity. Packaging often includes desiccants, keeping moisture away from the light-sensitive product. In my experience, proper storage extends the shelf life far beyond the expiry date printed on the label, as long as the medication never faces heat or humidity.
Different doses exist, most commonly as 250 mg or 500 mg tablets, although the strength refers to the salt form—not the actual amount of chloroquine base. Some confusion can arise if people mix up the terms, but healthcare professionals clarify instructions for patients without hesitation, drawing diagrams or using colored tablets as references if literacy presents an obstacle.
Chloroquine phosphate treats life-threatening infections, but its effects extend beyond the parasite. Some people experience stomach discomfort, headaches, or vision changes. For most, these pass with time or remain mild, but higher doses—like those used for extra-intestinal amoebiasis—require close monitoring. I’ve encountered patients with rare but severe reactions, including skin eruptions or changes in mental status. These side effects underscore the need for guidance from someone trained in medicine, especially since self-medicating can quickly lead to trouble.
Awareness of interactions grows every year. Patients taking antiarrhythmics, antiepileptics, or certain antibiotics should mention these to their doctor or pharmacist, as the wrong pairing could tip the balance toward toxicity. People with a history of liver or kidney problems need adjustments, while ongoing bloodwork may serve as a safety net for those who rely on the drug long-term, such as patients with autoimmune conditions.
Throughout history, global health campaigns relied on the reliability and low cost of chloroquine to contain malaria outbreaks. Mass treatment and prevention programs made use of its simple, scalable dosage schedule. Even today, some governments include it as part of routine health supplies. The arrival of resistance didn’t eliminate necessity for the drug—it shifted its role to more targeted scenarios.
During recent pandemics, speculative use of chloroquine grabbed headlines. Many people remember its moment in the limelight as researchers debated possible benefits in new diseases. Despite early excitement, strong studies have consistently underscored that responsible usage rooted in solid clinical evidence offers the best path forward. Chloroquine phosphate’s essential function remains anchored in diseases where scientific consensus supports its role, not as a universal remedy for all infections.
Healthcare advances often draw from older drugs, using new tools to re-examine known agents. The story of chloroquine phosphate reads as a lesson in humility—what works wonders for one generation may falter with evolving threats, like resistant forms of malaria. In my own practice, I’ve seen the value of pairing the medicine’s strengths against its limitations, treating it not as a silver bullet but as a loyal servant with a defined purpose.
Extensive use across continents helped discover that widespread medicating without confirmed infection breeds resistance. This insight now shapes malaria control policies that push for bed nets, rapid diagnostic tests, and rotating medications rather than blanket campaigns of mass distribution.
Unlike injectable antimalarials used in hospitals, chloroquine tablets allow broad access in community settings. Patients in hard-to-reach areas often depend on straightforward oral therapy. Yet, the reliance on an accessible tablet can turn against communities if counterfeiters flood markets with fake products. Over the years, I’ve received reports of fake pills flooding border towns, sometimes containing nothing but chalk or, worse, toxic substitutes. This remains an ongoing challenge calling for improved monitoring, community education, and the involvement of local leaders to help people recognize authentic supplies.
Another challenge grows from the subtle line between therapeutic and toxic dose. While trained personnel know the distinction, self-diagnosis remains common in places with pharmacist shortages or weak health systems. Chloroquine’s toxicity window produces dangerous effects when taken in large quantities, resulting in lasting harm or rapid decline if not caught early. This brings home the need for better public education, safer dispensing practices, and wider access to clinical resources—especially as internet rumors and misinformed advice spread faster than official recommendations.
Cost and wide availability set chloroquine phosphate apart. Many regions secure it through government tenders or aid agencies, supporting large scale prevention and treatment campaigns. Its stability in challenging conditions—on dusty shelves or in steamy climates—further enhances its value outside metropolitan centers. The product’s simplicity counts as another benefit: easily split for pediatric use, compatible with basic medicine regimens, and rarely in short supply if supply chains function smoothly.
Modern alternatives, while effective, often require several components blended into combination therapies. These new options drive up prices and complicate logistics, including cold chain requirements. In contrast, chloroquine can travel vast distances and remain potent for years under proper storage, a crucial advantage during emergencies or natural disasters.
As science marches forward, chloroquine phosphate continues to teach the medical field about adaptability. It demonstrates the need for regular drug resistance surveillance, especially as resistance ebbs and flows over time. Public health authorities now pair its distribution with strong diagnostic infrastructure, using data to direct stockpiles and treatment recommendations, rather than falling back on tradition alone.
Education ranks high among interventions. In the field, health workers receive hands-on training to distinguish malaria types and pick the right treatment. Community outreach programs explain how chloroquine works, highlight its limits, and steer people away from using leftovers. This blend of practical wisdom and up-to-date science ensures that patients get the prospects of cure without haphazard risks.
Research groups continue to examine pathways for extending chloroquine’s useful life. Whether through developing diagnostic kits capable of spotting resistant strains or partnering with regional health organizations, innovation doesn’t shy away from well-known compounds. I’ve heard scientists debate using lower doses as prophylaxis in unique scenarios, always cross-referencing fresh data with historical lessons.
Progress rarely means abandoning the past outright. Scientists work to identify genetic markers which flag resistance, aiming for rapid turnaround in the field. By combining these insights with real-time monitoring, policy-makers adapt quickly when the landscape changes, pulling chloroquine from the forefront when resistance grows and returning it when the ground shifts.
Every effective treatment owes its success to stewardship. Chloroquine phosphate walks the fine line between trusted companion and blunt instrument, offering affordable relief but demanding vigilance. As with antibiotics or any legacy medication, the temptation to lean too heavily on convenience must yield to careful oversight. Field data, gathered from community clinics and big-city hospitals alike, point the way toward smarter protocols.
Involving patients in the process has become vital. Comprehensive labeling, accessible education campaigns, and support groups for chronic autoimmune conditions all arise from a basic principle—partners in care build stronger health outcomes. Whether providing humanitarian aid or supporting national programs, those dispensing chloroquine phosphate bear the responsibility of clear, nuanced conversation.
Blending old strengths with new approaches can pave the way forward. Health systems benefit from digital tracking tools to monitor stock, reduce waste, and catch counterfeit bursts before harm spreads widely. Governments working with pharmaceutical suppliers can ensure consistent quality, sidestepping the pitfalls seen in fragmented supply chains.
As resistance patterns shift, investment in research offers a crucial lifeline. Funding regional laboratories and building partnerships with universities turns data into actionable policy without delay. Training for local pharmacists and healthcare workers ensures that advice reaches even isolated settlements, reinforcing the safety net.
Community engagement makes a difference that numbers alone cannot measure. Tapping local knowledge to trace outbreaks, debunk rumors, and support vulnerable groups draws on the strengths of collective effort. Together with consistent, evidence-informed messaging, this approach roots out confusion before it can grow.
Chloroquine phosphate’s story remains unfinished. A product that began as a tool against malaria now carries lessons for medicine’s future, where tradition and innovation both hold weight. Its ongoing presence in clinics, national programs, and home medicine chests signals a lasting purpose—protecting people through times of certainty and challenge alike.
The medicine’s enduring relevance calls for the best of modern science and the wisdom born of practice. The path forward means staying alert to changing resistance, investing in quality assurance, and keeping the lines of education open. If anything, this history illustrates that medicines—like the people who rely on them—thrive when respected and treated with care, insight, and a willingness to adapt in step with the world’s needs.