|
HS Code |
867002 |
| Chemicalformula | C6H7O2(OOCCH3)3 |
| Molarmass | 162.1406 g/mol (for monomer unit) |
| Appearance | White to off-white flakes or powder |
| Density | 1.27–1.34 g/cm³ |
| Meltingpoint | 230–260°C (decomposes) |
| Solubilityinwater | Insoluble |
| Solubilityinothersolvents | Soluble in acetone, acetic acid, and organic solvents |
| Glasstransitiontemperature | 185–200°C |
| Tensilestrength | 30–60 MPa |
| Refractiveindex | 1.47 |
| Biodegradability | Partially biodegradable |
| Flammability | Flammable |
| Odor | Odorless |
As an accredited Cellulose Acetate factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Cellulose Acetate, 500g, is packaged in a sealed, moisture-resistant, HDPE bottle with clear labeling for safe chemical storage. |
| Shipping | Cellulose Acetate is typically shipped in tightly sealed, moisture-resistant containers to prevent contamination and degradation. It should be stored and transported in cool, dry conditions, away from sources of ignition and incompatible materials. Proper labeling and documentation, following relevant safety and regulatory guidelines, are essential for safe and compliant shipping. |
| Storage | Cellulose acetate should be stored in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area away from sources of heat, ignition, and direct sunlight. Keep the container tightly closed and protected from moisture. Store separately from strong oxidizing agents and acids. Use only approved, compatible storage containers. Ensure that storage areas comply with local fire regulations due to cellulose acetate’s flammability. |
|
Purity 99.5%: Cellulose Acetate with 99.5% purity is used in photographic film manufacturing, where it ensures high optical clarity and minimal impurities in film base production. Viscosity grade 30 cP: Cellulose Acetate of 30 cP viscosity grade is used in membrane filtration, where it provides precise pore control for efficient particle separation. Molecular weight 55,000 Da: Cellulose Acetate with 55,000 Da molecular weight is used in cigarette filter production, where it delivers consistent filtration performance and structural integrity. Melting point 230°C: Cellulose Acetate with a melting point of 230°C is used in injection molding applications, where it maintains dimensional stability during processing at elevated temperatures. Particle size 50 microns: Cellulose Acetate with a particle size of 50 microns is used in specialty coatings, where it achieves a smooth finish and uniform film formation. Stability temperature 180°C: Cellulose Acetate stable up to 180°C is used in textile fiber spinning, where it resists thermal degradation during fiber extrusion. Acetyl content 39.8%: Cellulose Acetate with 39.8% acetyl content is used in high-performance eyeglass frames, where it increases flexibility and enhances impact resistance. Moisture content ≤ 2%: Cellulose Acetate with moisture content ≤ 2% is used in pharmaceutical capsule production, where it prevents swelling and ensures dimensional uniformity. Transparency ≥ 90%: Cellulose Acetate with transparency ≥ 90% is used in protective packaging films, where it provides clear visibility and aesthetic appeal. Solubility in acetone >95%: Cellulose Acetate with acetone solubility over 95% is used in ink formulations, where it enables rapid dissolution and smooth ink dispersal. |
Competitive Cellulose Acetate prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to admin@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: admin@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Cellulose acetate doesn’t usually make headlines, but experience has taught me to pay attention when something shows up over and over in everyday products. This is a tough, versatile plastic produced by modifying cellulose, which is what gives plant fibers their backbone. Out in the real world, you’ll see cellulose acetate pop up in eyeglass frames, film, cigarette filters, and even some textiles. Model names—like “CA-398-30” or “CA-320S”—mark different formulas, each with properties aimed at a task. Take CA-398-30 for example: it handles heat well and flexes without cracking, so it winds up in high-end eyewear. Flake form makes for easy processing, while granular shapes suit injection molding machines better.
Manufacturers tune the specifications by adjusting things like acetyl content, which bumps up moisture resistance, or playing with plasticizer type and concentration to tweak flexibility. One model might run at 54-56% acetyl, stiff enough for a comb that doesn’t snap during morning routines. Lower acetyl content brings more transparency and less brittleness, perfect for delicate finishes on spectacle frames.
Conversations about plastics usually focus on pure convenience, but cellulose acetate has a stronger environmental case than most. Instead of sticking around forever like pure synthetic plastics, it comes from renewable tree pulp and breaks down faster in natural conditions. Looking at the numbers, standard synthetic plastics can stick around for centuries, clogging up landfills and oceans. Cellulose acetate, especially with the right disposal, can drop off the planet much quicker. I’ve seen composting operations breaking these materials down in just a few years, under the right mix of moisture and microbes. It’s not a silver bullet for pollution, but it’s a step forward.
Eyeglass wearers know the comfort of frames that rest lightly and survive the bustle of daily life. That same toughness and lightness pop up again in tough textile fibers and photographic film. Industries lean hard on cellulose acetate due to its transparency, coloring options, and moldability. This adaptability doesn’t just suit industrial designers—it puts a dent in the idea that renewable, partly degradable materials have to feel flimsy or look drab.
Walking through an optician’s shop, the shine and deep color of some glasses frames stand out. That’s the fingerprint of cellulose acetate; it takes dyes beautifully, holds a polish, and stays comfortable against the skin. Some eyewear makers even use cellulose acetate in layered designs, slicing thin sheets and stacking them to create unique color patterns. Anyone who’s used film cameras knows another application—old-school photographic film, invented on this plastic, replaced flammable nitrate and changed photography for good.
Another place where this product shows up: cigarette filters. There’s a lot of debate about their environmental impact, but filters with cellulose acetate at least move closer to breaking down than completely synthetic filters. In the textile world, lightweight acetate fibers bring soft, breathable comfort to linings and luxury fabrics. They give dresses shine and drape that designers chase, with more breathability than straight-up polyester.
Talking with fellow engineers and craftspeople, certain differences between cellulose acetate and other plastics come up again and again. Compared to acrylics, cellulose acetate gives you softer flexibility with less cracking and won’t yellow as quickly with sunlight exposure. Unlike polycarbonate, it doesn’t pack the same impact resistance, but makes up for it with easier processing and warmer feel in the hand. Compared to PVC, there’s no chlorine—a win for reducing chemical hazards during production and disposal.
Many companies have tried using bio-based plastics as alternatives—cornstarch polymers are a popular substitute. But these often lose out when it comes to handling heat, finishing, or enduring daily use. Anyone who’s handled cheap substitutes recognizes the plastic-y squeak or fast yellowing. Cellulose acetate just feels richer and ages better, especially in high-wear applications. Instead of fading or scratching up in a few months, well-made acetate frames usually last for years without looking run down.
Specifications can be intimidating, but I’ve learned not to get lost in the paperwork. When it comes to cellulose acetate, the figures point to real-world benefits. A common material like CA-398-30 clocks a glass transition temperature around 95°C, meaning it holds its shape well in hot conditions (a welcome feature for glasses left in a parked car). Density sits just north of 1.3 g/cm³, which translates to a solid, but not heavy, feel. Tensile strength figures help eyeglasses and tool handles resist snapping under pressure. High optical clarity means designers can make colorful, light-passing items, not just dull blocks.
Additives like plasticizers shift properties. Some blends become soft and bendy, used for films that have to wrap and twist without tearing. Others get loaded for sturdiness, targeting pieces that need to take a beating. Manufacturers often swap in phthalate-free choices to address health concerns. From fieldwork, I’ve seen how the right specs mean fewer product recalls and less customer frustration.
Processing this plastic still takes skill. For eyewear, technicians cut blocks into sheets, heat and press them into curves, then file and polish by hand. That’s how they coax out the gloss and smooth surfaces that give luxury frames their edge. In injection molding, machine operators dial in precise temperatures and pressures, relying on stable melt flow and colorability. These steps decide whether the final piece keeps color, bends instead of snaps, and survives in daily use.
Not all cellulose acetate behaves alike. Some blends handle better under sharp blades; others gum up equipment unless everything’s tuned just right. That learning curve keeps skilled workers in demand, especially as designs become more ambitious. The material tolerates laser engraving or numerically controlled shaping, making intricate inlays and personalized touches possible. It’s reassuring to see a material bridge artisan handwork with modern automation without falling short on either end.
Many people assume anything called “bio-based” leaves no waste behind. Cellulose acetate is better than most, but landfill or ocean disposal can still slow down the breakdown process. Without the right microorganisms, especially under dry or cold conditions, some filters and scraps linger. Regulatory groups have started calling for clearer communication on what “biodegradable” really means. Some manufacturers have stepped up, exploring catalysts or additives that speed up decomposition, or working with composting partners to keep product cycles closed.
One challenge shows up in recycling. Cellulose acetate rarely makes it into standard plastics streams, either because the material gets mixed with dyes, coatings, or multiple layers. Sorting and cleaning each piece by hand gets expensive fast. I’ve worked with startups trying to solve this by breaking down scraps with solvents, pulling out the base cellulose, and feeding it into new products. Promising early results show that circular processing can work, but only if enough material and demand line up. This topic deserves more industry buy-in and public pressure.
Nobody wants to think about the chemistry of their coffee stirrer or the frame balancing on their nose. But cellulose acetate often improves those unnoticed moments. Frames don’t slip and squeak, nor do they turn brittle in winter cold or sweaty in the summer. Disposable products—like certain toothbrush handles or crafts materials—gain extra life and feel a touch smoother. Longevity doesn’t just mean lasting forever in a landfill, but surviving daily use without falling apart on short notice.
For people with allergies or sensitive skin, cellulose acetate tends to avoid the sharp chemical smells or discomfort found in deeper synthetic plastics. Dental professionals sometimes recommend it as the base for mouthguards and dental trays, thanks to its safety profile and pleasant, neutral feel. Toss in the color possibilities—ranging from soft translucency to bold, saturated hues—and designers see it as a blank slate rather than a compromise.
Sustainability claims fall flat if they aren’t matched with honest sourcing and waste-management practices. The best cellulose acetate starts from timber managed under strict forestry standards, lowering the odds that ancient forests get sacrificed for quick profits. Pulp suppliers who track chain-of-custody and enforce worker safety are making headway, but greenwashing remains a real threat in the specialty chemicals market.
End-of-life planning matters just as much as sourcing. Composting can work for clean acetate products, especially in municipal programs with high turnover and proper conditions. Cigarette filters remain a sore spot—on its own, acetate breaks down with enzymes over a few years, but leftover toxins complicate disposal. Industry leaders have started working on filter additives or new designs meant to boost breakdown time and cut toxicity, but consumer education lags behind. Real improvement will take partnerships with cities, regulators, and waste experts, plus blunt transparency about what gets left behind after use.
Factories and workshops face trade-offs every day. PVC and polycarbonate deliver raw mechanical strength, but often bring higher toxicity, lower workability, or waste headaches. Cellulose acetate offers designers a rare midpoint: strong enough to last, soft enough to work, and renewably sourced. This balance has let industries bridge tradition and progress. In eyewear, acetate frames replaced brittle horn or shell. In film and photography, it dodged the safety risks of nitrate. Even in textiles, it carves out a niche where natural shine sits side by side with comfort.
Textile mills spinning acetate filaments for linings and satin showcase its fluid drape and ability to take vivid colors without bleeding. Tool manufacturers pick sheets and rods for handles that resist fats, acids, or cleaning chemicals better than many petroleum-based plastics. There are still trade-offs: cellulose acetate doesn’t defeat all forms of scratching or heat softening. But in the hands of good engineers, these can be offset with coatings, reinforcements, or hybrid structures.
If you look at the numbers, global plastic consumption has doubled in these last two decades, putting new pressure on rivers, air, and food systems. Each time an industry switches a single product line from petro-based plastics to cellulose acetate, some fossil carbon stays locked in the ground a little longer. It’s not perfect. Some cellulose acetate gets mixed with non-renewable materials, and composting works best only in the right conditions, but it sure beats throwing more polystyrene into the waste stream.
As someone who’s met with product developers and environmental researchers at workshops, I’ve come to believe we need clearer labeling and honest reporting on end-of-life options. More retailers and manufacturers are starting to show disposal advice, material breakdowns, and even recalls in digital product passports. This transparency helps regular people make choices without needing a degree in polymer science.
Large-scale change also calls for government backing. Policies that encourage renewable feedstocks and compostable design standards have started making a real difference. A few years back, the EU brought in strict rules for labeling biodegradable plastics. Progress isn’t uniform, but every nudge helps manufacturers innovate rather than doing the bare minimum. Customers should demand stronger policies, but industries shouldn’t wait on governments to do the right thing either.
One thing this field keeps showing me: no single material fixes every problem. Bio-based alternatives like cellulose acetate have to work alongside clean-up efforts, new recycling technology, and smarter design rules. I’ve talked to innovators using this plastic in combination with digital tracking, allowing batches to be traced from forest through factory to product, and eventually back into circular recycling or composting loops. There is momentum, but keeping it going means refusing to accept shortcuts or wishful “green” marketing.
Academia, industry, and public agencies all have roles here. Research teams at major universities focus on improving the breakdown processes that keep cellulose acetate from joining the plastic trash tide. At the same time, fashion and eyewear brands are taking up the challenge by offering take-back programs and investing in biodegradable dyes and non-toxic coatings. Rather than seeing this as a competition, successful companies see opportunity in sharing their results and certifying their processes.
Ultimately, the future depends on consumers putting pressure on brands to live up to their claims. The most responsible companies openly share sourcing stories, post third-party certifications, and correct missteps without hiding behind legal fine print. Everyday buyers can make a huge difference, even by asking shop staff about end-of-life disposal or by searching for batch codes and recycling instructions.
Schools and museums now highlight bio-based plastics like cellulose acetate in sustainability exhibitions. Educators break down complicated chemistry for children, showing how materials affect waterways and forests. That kind of outreach pays dividends in more thoughtful purchases and less landfill-bound waste.
Reflecting on the journey of cellulose acetate, I see a material that’s adapted to a surprising range of needs. It brings together historical depth, value for skilled makers, and a path toward more responsible use of plastic in everyday life. While it hasn’t replaced every synthetic, its blend of renewable origins, workable feel, and lower toxicity deserves recognition. Our next challenge is linking better materials to smarter policy and greater consumer awareness. As more people—including families, designers, scientists, and businesses—dig deeper, there’s a chance for cellulose acetate to show what modern materials can become when tradition, craftsmanship, and ethics matter.