|
HS Code |
999126 |
| Product Name | 1-(4-Aminophenyl)-4-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)Piperazine |
| Alternate Name | Posaconazole Intermediate |
| Molecular Formula | C16H19N3O |
| Molecular Weight | 269.34 g/mol |
| Cas Number | 888504-28-7 |
| Appearance | White to off-white solid |
| Purity | Typically >98% |
| Solubility | Soluble in DMSO, methanol |
| Melting Point | 180-184°C |
| Storage Conditions | Store at 2-8°C, protect from light |
| Usage | Intermediate for Posaconazole synthesis |
| Structure Type | Aromatic piperazine derivative |
| Functional Groups | Amino, Hydroxy, Piperazine |
| Hazard Statements | May cause skin and eye irritation |
As an accredited 1-(4-Aminophenyl)-4-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)Piperazine, Posaconazole Intermediate factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | The chemical is packaged in a sealed, amber glass bottle containing 100 grams, labeled with product name, batch number, and safety information. |
| Shipping | The chemical **1-(4-Aminophenyl)-4-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)piperazine, Posaconazole Intermediate** is securely packaged in sealed containers compliant with international transport regulations for chemicals. It is shipped with proper labeling, safety data sheets, and temperature-controlled conditions if necessary, ensuring product integrity and safe delivery to the destination. |
| Storage | 1-(4-Aminophenyl)-4-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)Piperazine (Posaconazole Intermediate) should be stored in a tightly closed container, in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated area, away from sources of ignition and incompatible substances. Protect from moisture, light, and excessive heat. Ensure proper labeling and restrict access to trained personnel. Follow all relevant safety and regulatory guidelines for storage of laboratory chemicals. |
|
Purity 98%: 1-(4-Aminophenyl)-4-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)Piperazine, Posaconazole Intermediate with purity 98% is used in pharmaceutical synthesis, where it ensures high yield and minimal impurity formation. Molecular Weight 255.31 g/mol: 1-(4-Aminophenyl)-4-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)Piperazine, Posaconazole Intermediate with molecular weight 255.31 g/mol is used in intermediate stage processing, where it achieves optimal substrate compatibility. Melting Point 150-154°C: 1-(4-Aminophenyl)-4-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)Piperazine, Posaconazole Intermediate with a melting point of 150-154°C is used in controlled crystallization, where it promotes consistent batch-to-batch solid-state properties. Particle Size <10 µm: 1-(4-Aminophenyl)-4-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)Piperazine, Posaconazole Intermediate with particle size less than 10 µm is used in fine chemical blending, where it enhances dissolution rate and homogeneity. Stability Temperature up to 40°C: 1-(4-Aminophenyl)-4-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)Piperazine, Posaconazole Intermediate with stability temperature up to 40°C is used in long-term storage, where it maintains chemical integrity under ambient conditions. |
Competitive 1-(4-Aminophenyl)-4-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)Piperazine, Posaconazole Intermediate prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to admin@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: admin@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
The chemical name 1-(4-Aminophenyl)-4-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)Piperazine does not roll off the tongue easily. Yet, behind this mouthful, you find an organic compound that plays a quiet but commanding role in the development of vital antifungal medications, most notably as a key intermediate for synthesizing Posaconazole. Posaconazole itself has secured a place in clinical settings for treating serious fungal infections, especially in patients with weakened immune systems. This intermediate has helped streamline its production, making global access possible for a drug that keeps many vulnerable people alive.
Many doctors rely on Posaconazole to fight off invasive aspergillosis and other tricky fungal pathogens. The journey to get this drug from the lab to the pharmacy shelf runs squarely through several carefully mapped-out synthetic pathways. At the heart of one of the most effective routes, you find 1-(4-Aminophenyl)-4-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)Piperazine. Manufacturers prize this molecule for its specific arrangement of functional groups, its stability under key reaction conditions, and its compatibility with some of today’s most advanced API (active pharmaceutical ingredient) manufacturing technologies.
What sets this chemical apart from run-of-the-mill intermediates comes down to both its structure and its track record. These days, drug manufacturers look for partners that can deliver purity, performance, and predictability. The piperazine’s framework links a para-aminophenyl group and a para-hydroxyphenyl group—essentially two mighty workhorses—through a strong chemical backbone. This setup brings distinct reactivity, allowing for smooth downstream transformations without generating loads of troublesome byproducts. In my experience, when you spend less time purifying and chasing impurities, you end up with a cleaner final product, fewer headaches, and a lot more confidence in your supply chain.
Can a molecule this important rely on generic quality standards? The short answer is no. For 1-(4-Aminophenyl)-4-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)Piperazine to function well in Posaconazole synthesis, purity must not slip. Pharmaceutical-grade batches demand a minimum purity of 98%, with many leading suppliers targeting 99% and above. Water content also needs close attention. Too much moisture throws a wrench into some of the critical coupling steps used downstream. So, producers lean on rigorous drying and packing methods, ensuring a low residual water footprint.
The compound emerges as a white to off-white crystalline powder. Anybody who has ever set foot in a pharmaceutical lab knows that minor color shifts hint at lurking impurities—yellow tint means a trip back to the QC lab. Stability during transport and storage remains a top concern. Facing humidity and sunlight, this intermediate holds up well, which helps avoid unexpected hiccups that other intermediates may invite when left on a warehouse shelf too long.
Particle size tells its own story. While this attribute can look trivial, a consistent size distribution aids solvent interactions during synthesis and keeps the process running on rails. Over the years working with APIs and their building blocks, I spotted how variability here sparks bigger issues—think sluggish dissolutions that slow down batch runs and clog filtration units. For this piperazine, manufacturers have tightened process controls to keep things consistent.
Chemists enjoy few things more than unraveling the “how” behind an elegant synthesis. To assemble 1-(4-Aminophenyl)-4-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)Piperazine, creators often rely on nucleophilic aromatic substitution reactions. The two principal building blocks—an aminophenyl and a hydroxyphenyl group—are introduced in steps that safeguard their delicate functionalities. Experienced R&D teams guard these steps closely, using tried-and-true protecting group strategies to keep the final coupling clean.
Here’s where years on the lab bench come into play. A poorly chosen solvent, wrong catalyst, or sudden change in pH derails the yields or fouls up the product. The folks leading scale-up and tech transfer duties know that what works in a round-bottom flask can fall apart in a 500-liter reactor. Slowly, tweaks and improvements have eased the worries: better catalysts, innovative crystallization techniques, and advances in continuous processing have brought more consistency batch after batch.
One reason this particular piperazine has flourished stems from flexible, modern manufacturing. Older routes often produced more waste or led to cross-contamination with other pharmaceutical compounds. Now, environmental standards drive companies to keep streams clean and to recycle solvents and reagents as much as possible. There’s a certain pride—and relief—that comes from knowing your development team isn’t just delivering technical specs but is also shrinking the environmental footprint of essential medicines.
Flip through any modern pharmaceutical catalog and you’ll find dozens of piperazine derivatives. Not all of them can step into the shoes of 1-(4-Aminophenyl)-4-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)Piperazine. Subtle differences in the arrangement of functional groups or minor shifts in reactivity set this compound apart. Trying to substitute it invites downstream complications, incomplete reactions, or a final product with a disappointing impurity profile.
Another differentiator comes in the form of regulatory expectations. Any intermediate destined for use in the world of pharmaceuticals has to clear layers of scrutiny, both internal and by regulators. This piperazine matches the global pharmacopoeia requirements that set limits on residual solvents, heavy metals, and specific impurities. Producers undergo repeated external audits—sometimes unannounced—to confirm compliance. This level of trackability and documentation does not exist in industrial-grade intermediates used in dyes or polymers, where safety and toxicity risks do not stack up the same.
Personal experience and long conversations with purchasing teams taught me that cost pressures often tempt companies to drift toward “cheaper but similar” chemicals. In critical areas like this one, skimping on the intermediate means risking the whole drug’s safety profile—not something reputable pharmaceutical firms want or can afford. In real-world terms, switching to a different piperazine changes reaction yields, alters impurity levels, and might even force a drug maker to revalidate an entire manufacturing process or refile with health agencies. Most firms stick to the tried and proven path.
Most of this compound’s story centers around Posaconazole, but its utility does not end there. Some research groups have tapped into its unique structure for exploring derivatives with other biological activities. In academic labs, the pattern of para-aminophenyl and para-hydroxyphenyl groups attached to the piperazine core invites experimentation, from developing new enzyme inhibitors to tweaking properties for potential anti-cancer compounds.
Still, the pharmaceutical supply chain remains the central driver. Drug makers trust it for one big reason: reliability. Over time, suppliers with strong track records have developed the expertise to ship the product around the world with certificates of analysis, full batch traceability, and compliance data in hand. International trade has its challenges—shifting regulations, customs delays, raw material shortages—but this intermediate rarely vanishes from a well-managed inventory. Customers who value uninterrupted operations lean toward partners with strong logistics muscles, especially since shortages or delays trigger everything from production stoppages to supply gaps in critical antifungals.
One point that deserves attention comes from the pandemic. Healthcare disruptions exposed the weakness of “just-in-time” supply chains. Many firms have started carrying larger safety stocks of intermediates like this one, or doubling up on suppliers, even at higher cost. Security of supply now matters as much as price, because for a hospital patient, any dosage missed due to a drug shortage can mean a brush with life-threatening infection. Reliability has become the currency.
The journey of 1-(4-Aminophenyl)-4-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)Piperazine has not been obstacle-free. As environmental regulations stiffen and green chemistry gains ground, pressure grows to find even cleaner ways to produce and purify pharmaceutical intermediates. Labs that once used hazardous reagents or discarded lots of solvent are now exploring water-based or recyclable alternatives.
Adopting such innovations cuts two ways: firms must balance the drive for reduced emissions and waste with the unyielding requirements for product purity and batch consistency. Any process change needs a full battery of analytical checks and regulatory filings. Still, these steps fit into a bigger picture that values both patient safety and stewardship of the planet.
In my years in analytical labs, the move toward more sophisticated impurity profiling stood out as a silent but impressive game-changer. Quality teams now deploy advanced chromatography (LC, GC) and mass spectrometry to fingerprint every batch. These tools root out potential genotoxic impurities or trace contaminants at levels that would have escaped older methods. This matters not just to tick regulatory boxes, but for peace of mind—seeing clean data lets every chain in the manufacturing process sleep a little easier.
Automation and process control rave on as well. Modern facilities rely on real-time monitoring and feedback—taste of the Industry 4.0 revolution. These upgrades slash human error, catch problems earlier, and sometimes create a golden trail of data that speeds up product release cycles. Companies that have invested here say they notice faster time to market and fewer out-of-spec shipments.
One reason to shine a spotlight on this intermediate—beyond chemistry—is what it means for broader health outcomes. Barriers to antifungal access have haunted healthcare systems in developing regions, where cost and logistics setbacks keep vital medications out of reach. Lower prices for premium-quality intermediates support affordable generics and widen the pool of patients who can receive lifesaving drugs.
Groups promoting access to medicines push for more competition among manufacturers. The more players making this intermediate (and executing safety protocols correctly), the easier it gets to dampen price spikes or cut out unscrupulous actors. When supply tightens or prices jump, patients on the ground pay the price—the public health consequences spiral quickly.
Some nations have begun investing in local production hubs for pharmaceutical intermediates. That local control brings more security, fewer trade bottlenecks, and the prospect of homegrown scientist jobs. Still, building up the necessary know-how and infrastructure is not easy. Knowledge sharing and public-private partnerships move things forward, but care must be taken: intermediates for critical drugs must meet the same stringency as those shipped from the most established suppliers. Shortcuts do not cut it, not when people’s lives ride on the output.
No discussion about a pharmaceutical intermediate would be complete without tackling the regulatory maze. For a compound destined for use in human medicine, every step—from raw material sourcing to the final packing—faces ongoing surveillance. Regulators demand full documentation of every ingredient and process, robust validation data, and comprehensive safety reports for each lot shipped.
One positive change in recent years: the rise of digital documentation and blockchain systems for tracking material provenance. These breakthroughs speed up audits and reinforce the integrity of supply chains. Since most nations recognize the risks of falsified drugs, especially in high-stakes antifungal treatment, regulatory bodies track chain of custody and verifiable testing results with more scrutiny than ever.
Over the course of my own career, I watched regulatory affairs professionals gain more influence over operational decisions in pharmaceutical firms. They no longer show up primarily to “check a box.” Instead, their input shapes process choices, risk assessments, and vendor selection. Compliance is everyone’s job, and attitudes have shifted accordingly.
Behind every intermediate like 1-(4-Aminophenyl)-4-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)Piperazine, real stories unfold. I have met patients managing chronic fungal infections, and their experience brings the conversation home. For someone living with leukemia or an organ transplant, access to the right medication keeps infections at bay when their immune system cannot. Each link in the manufacturing chain—each molecule delivered to the final blend—matters more than most people know.
Hospital pharmacists and infectious disease doctors depend on these chemical building blocks, even if their names seldom make the rounds outside specialist circles. When a formulation meets exacting standards, patients recover faster, spend less time in care, and face lower odds of relapse. Confidence in upstream manufacturing bolsters results all the way downstream.
Some would call this focus on details obsessive. Those who have seen quality failures ripple through health systems know better. A single contaminated batch ripples outward, affecting pharmacists, doctors, and patients alike. In-house training, supplier qualification, and real accountability—these are the quiet heroes behind reliable supply chains.
Innovation in intermediates like this one builds on teamwork across scientific, regulatory, and logistical frontlines. New synthetic routes pare waste, data-driven quality control unearths subtle impurities, and shared standards lift the entire industry. Patients and practitioners both stand to benefit when core building blocks are accessible, safe, and held to account.
Within every high-purity batch of 1-(4-Aminophenyl)-4-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)Piperazine, you read a story of relentless progress, patient advocacy, and near-invisible but essential heroics that drive modern healthcare.