|
HS Code |
839865 |
| Chemical Name | Eugenic Acid |
| Alternative Names | 4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenol acid, Eugenol acid |
| Molecular Formula | C10H10O3 |
| Molar Mass | 178.19 g/mol |
| Appearance | White to off-white crystalline powder |
| Melting Point | 140-142 °C |
| Solubility In Water | Slightly soluble |
| Cas Number | 97-79-2 |
| Odor | Characteristic, similar to clove |
| Origin | Derived from eugenol oxidation |
| Uses | Pharmaceutical intermediates, fragrance industry, analytical chemistry |
As an accredited Eugenic Acid factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Eugenic Acid, 500g: Supplied in a sealed amber glass bottle with tamper-evident cap, labeled with hazard, safety, and handling instructions. |
| Shipping | Eugenic Acid should be shipped in tightly sealed, chemically resistant containers, clearly labeled according to regulatory standards. It must be handled as a potentially hazardous substance, protected from light, moisture, and incompatibles. During transit, temperature control and secondary containment are recommended to prevent leaks or spills. Follow all applicable transport regulations. |
| Storage | Eugenic Acid should be stored in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated area, away from direct sunlight, heat sources, and incompatible substances such as strong oxidizers. Keep the container tightly closed when not in use, and store in a corrosion-resistant container with a resistant inner liner. Ensure proper labeling and restrict access to qualified personnel only. |
Competitive Eugenic Acid prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to admin@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: admin@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
At our factory, every ton of Eugenic Acid we produce represents years of refinement, troubleshooting, and responsive adjustment to real-world customer requirements. Our process, based on batch production methods and in-line quality control systems, allows tight control over purity and physical parameters. Eugenic Acid shows up in many industrial contexts—flavor and fragrance synthesis, agrochemical intermediates, and even some areas of pharma manufacturing all draw from its core chemical traits. Unlike less consistent raw materials, every drum dispatched follows internal benchmarks developed from repeated analysis, trials, and direct feedback from end users.
We produce the EA-98 model, which refers to Eugenic Acid with a guaranteed minimum purity of 98.0% by GC. This level has proved effective for downstream applications where even minor impurities can alter the reactivity, final color, or odor profile of derived products. Customers in the cosmetics and fine chemistry sectors require not just high-purity but reproducible composition—no aberrant minor chemicals to throw off batch-to-batch stability. Moisture content rarely exceeds 0.2%, measured by Karl Fischer titration, to preserve both shelf stability and processing reliability. Color typically stays below 30 APHA, a detail flagged by perfumers and formulators because off-spec lots tint whole product lines.
Experience taught us to pay extra attention to the residue after evaporation (RAE)—fewer process hiccups result when RAE remains below 0.05%. Simple numbers like these tell a chemical manufacturer much about the steadiness and functional reach of a product. Even subtle differences in how a raw acid distills or crystallizes affect the handling performance for our customers.
Each Eugenic Acid batch traces back to its source materials, reactor charge date, and the specific filtration and distillation run. Our team logs anomalies—unexpected temperature spikes, foaming incidents, color drifts—because we learned the hard way that these can show up much later as reduced shelf life or user-reported inconsistencies. Traceability remains non-negotiable. Every delivery includes a quality certificate that matches laboratory data to the client’s requested parameters.
Product-specific labeling and documentation stem from constant onsite communication, not just regulatory requirements. Some downstream processors switch to vacuum lines for transfer, others employ steam heating. We tweak drum linings and seal materials based on such customer feedback, minimizing interaction with even trace levels of Eugenic Acid’s natural acidity.
Manufaturing teaches us that purity specs do not simply reflect laboratory ideals; they reflect the hard stop points set by real-life processors. Purity below 98% can trigger yellowing, deposit formation, or regulatory compliance headaches for users. On the flip side, over-refining carries a direct cost, and customers rarely wish to pay for ultra-high grades not essential for their work. The 98% mark came into being through dozens of iterative customer trials, not by committee guesswork.
For users synthesizing intermediates in high-volume settings, they do not want to risk a batch loss over drift in a side-isomer or contaminant. This is especially true for pharmaceutical pre-cursors, where even minor off-target molecules trip up downstream synthesis, spark new validation rounds, or—worst of all—draw scrutiny from auditors. Flavorists and fragrance chemists care about both purity and the particular isomer distribution; the “feel” and reactivity in blends come down to these subtle differences.
Eugenic Acid does not stand in isolation; traditional benzoic acids, cinnamic acid derivatives, and other aromatic carboxylic acids all compete for space in users’ process flows. Customers often mistake these substances as interchangeable, but routine trials quickly expose differences in chemical feel—color leaching, volatility, solubility profiles, and even the subtle edge a slightly different melting point introduces in reactor operation. From the perspective of those working every day with the fluid and crystalline forms, these differences set the stage for process success or hidden downtime.
Generic versions sometimes stack broad spec claims and push untested grades. That leads to inconsistent performance in many settings—gummy residues, extended reaction times, or off-odors in the finished goods. Our Eugenic Acid relies on source control and traceable plant operations, not spot market reselling. This doesn’t simply mean meeting a checklist but foreclosing the problems third-party material brings down the line.
Over the years, product engineers using lower-spec acids have returned to tighter-spec eugenic acid after disappointing runs and unexpected filtration clogs. Even equipment maintenance records track reduced fouling and easier cleaning cycles attributed directly to purer, more consistent acid.
Decisions about the form and packaging of Eugenic Acid result from conversations carried out between our logistics staff and our users’ line operators. Flakes sometimes fit best in pharmaceutical blending where dust control matters; liquids provide advantage for continuous-feed reactors where time equals money. Requests for bulk tankers stem from high-volume fragrance houses, single-kilo drums service R&D labs and start-ups. Our factory line adapts to such demand swings, with batch scheduling that absorbs rush orders without quality slip.
Lab feedback never sits on a shelf: if a shipment shows micro-trace impurities, our team isolates the affected run, scrutinizes reactor cleanliness, and applies preventative maintenance so recurrence does not occur. We do not rely only on finished product testing. Walking the plant, our team developed nose and eye calibration to catch off-quality long before GC signals or titration reveals a problem.
This one-on-one communication helps us catch small, use-driven requirements that no formal questionnaire can cover. One customer’s request to reduce drum weight by five kilograms, another’s note about pump compatibility—such feedback finds its way into the next cycle of improvements.
Eugenic Acid sits in the backbone of many biocide and herbicide syntheses. Process reliability and output purity in these applications make a real world difference—off-purity lots risk not just output declines but regulatory fines on the end product. Formulations that skew potentiate unwanted byproducts, requiring expensive post-reaction cleanups or batch discards. Recognizing how pH, color, and trace residuals carry through the manufacturing process, our team adapts process controls and, where requested, supports end users in fine-tuning their own methods.
In perfume and cosmetics, the purity and isomer ratio impact aroma profile more than non-specialists would expect. Even sub-ppm contaminants can drift floral blends into metallic, tangy, or off-putting space. Distillation curves and color indices achieved on our plant lines have been directly requested by leading fragrance houses—when competition supplies clone material with less color control, customers complain about batch-to-batch variation and, in the bottled product, shelf life falls behind expectations.
Where pharmaceutical intermediates come into play, compliance drives every parameter. Documentation packages, chain of custody records, and even drum seals follow pre-validated protocols along with specific requests for supporting analytical data. In some regional markets, registration of Eugenic Acid as an excipient or precursor puts direct obligations on the supplier—delays or failures in accurate analytical reporting cost our clients money and generate rework. By keeping our analytical department and production managers working in tandem, responses stay rapid, reports stay clean, and supply chain bottlenecks get reduced.
Experiences storing Eugenic Acid both onsite and downstream tell us that temperature, exposure to atmospheric moisture, and UV light all accelerate product breakdown. Moisture ingress quickly shifts both analytical numbers and usability on the floor. End users requested we raise drum barrier protection and add secondary labeling for storage instructions. Exposure to heat—such as sun-warmed loading bays or transport delays—initiates slow darkening, particularly in flake forms. Our warehouse teams now move inventory based on manufacture dates, not just FIFO by shipment age. As a result, user complaints about storage-related color shift have nearly vanished.
A major cause of performance variance used to come from packing style and warehouse handling upstream of arrival at the user’s site. We started using tamper-evident seals and double-bagging, not due to regulatory threat but based on direct feedback about dust and contamination entering supposedly sealed drums. This keeps the product as intended and reduces end user disputes.
No chemical process runs without hiccups. We faced upstream feedstock purity issues, rare filtrate failures, and the occasional runaway batch that needed full rework. Instead of hiding these, our quality team brings errors out in regular reviews. Investigation and root-cause analysis pull in line operators, shift supervisors, and technical management. This open approach encourages the reporting of small anomalies, so systemic flaws get fixed before volumes increase at risk.
End users supplied feedback on off-odor trends or hidden insoluble matter that only surfaced at larger scale. Rather than take offense, we worked with them on joint tests—using their process water, glassware, and heating systems—to pinpoint the source. Sometimes we learned it was our filtration step at fault, other times their line maintenance caused the issue. Shared understanding let both sides prevent repeat occurrences.
Investment in online monitoring and sample sharing with downstream QC labs underpins the stability customers demand. In one pharmaceutical scenario, collaborative troubleshooting with a client’s analytical team led us to re-specify the lot release criteria and tighten internal monitoring, reducing rejections for both parties.
Chemical manufacturing always faces regulatory scrutiny—local, national, and global. Our ongoing challenge centers on minimizing waste acid neutralization and maximizing recovery at every step. Over the years, we adopted closed loop cooling systems, optimized filtration rinsing, and installed vapor recovery modules, not just for compliance but to enable us to offer consistent quality at lower environmental cost. This keeps both the neighborhood and regulatory agencies on side.
Clients often ask about compliance documentation for international shipment—a simple promise or generic sheet does not cut it in the current landscape. Practical exposure to export audits, unscheduled plant inspections, and third-party lab confirmations all shape how we document, ship, and support our product. This experience built the backbone of our regulatory support, now valued by pharmaceutical and flavor houses expanding beyond their home territories.
Our experience with regional REACH registration, Hazard Communication, and local chemical manufacturing standards means we bring more than just paperwork—we supply guidance on cross-jurisdictional imports, clarify hazard labeling for workers, and answer real questions about batch traceability for custom applications where shelf life might matter more than formal labeling rules.
Anyone in chemicals recognizes the impact of supply chain interruptions—pandemic shortages, shipping delays, or feedstock spikes. By basing Eugenic Acid supply on consistent upstream partnerships and keeping minimum three months’ stock at any time, we buffer customer operations against the inevitable hiccups. This directly shields major users against the kind of last-minute shortages and price spikes that ripple unpredictably from market-wide events.
Switching between manufacturers often introduces subtle but crucial changes in how the acid behaves. We see this in user-reported shifts to blending difficulty, variable melting points, or altered solubility patterns. These differences rarely show up in formal specifications but make all the difference on the floor. Long-term customers cite this experiential reliability as the foundation for their preference, sticking with material that behaves predictably and stands up to scrutiny project after project.
No process stands still. Over time, users have given us feedback on desired flow characteristics, dust suppression for handling, alternate packaging, and cleaner pour points for semi-continuous applications. Each revision, from reinforced bag linings to improved flake morphology, traces directly to this feedback rather than theoretical design. Even small tweaks—adjusting anti-caking agents, increasing quality sampling frequency during humid seasons, or adapting to new user site construction—arise from direct manufacturing and field experience.
Our technical support staff bridges the gap between lab data and line reality. When a customer’s batch does not perform as expected, our team does not limit themselves to written reports. Site visits, on-line troubleshooting, and hands-on work with their technical teams cut through the abstraction and reach workable solutions. This reduces downtime for the user, increases mutual trust, and builds a two-way relationship that simply doesn’t occur with brokers or third-party traders.
For us, Eugenic Acid embodies the sum total of plant knowledge, adaptation to customer experience, and a commitment to quality informed by the factory line. By pairing rigorous process control with transparency, adaptation, and ongoing communication, our Eugenic Acid continues to supply industries ranging from agrochemicals to fine fragrance and pharmaceutical intermediates. Each drum shipped is more than a commodity—it’s a response to actual user needs, a reflection of plant know-how, and a foundation for enduring partnerships built on reliability, support, and shared problem-solving.