|
HS Code |
179236 |
| Scientific Name | Dickeya zeae |
| Taxonomy | Bacteria |
| Family | Pectobacteriaceae |
| Gram Status | Gram-negative |
| Shape | Rod-shaped |
| Motility | Motile (flagellated) |
| Pathogenicity | Plant pathogen |
| Host Range | Wide (includes rice, maize, banana, potato, and others) |
| Disease Caused | Soft rot and foot rot |
| Transmission | Water, contaminated tools, plant material |
| Optimum Temperature | 25-37°C |
| Oxygen Requirement | Facultative anaerobe |
| Notable Enzymes | Pectate lyase, cellulase |
| Symptoms | Wet, soft, mushy tissue decay |
| Economic Impact | Serious crop losses in agriculture |
As an accredited Dickeya Zeae factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Dickeya zeae packaging: 100 mL sterile amber glass bottle, tamper-evident cap, clear hazard labeling, cold-chain transport, manufacturer's identification. |
| Shipping | Dickeya zeae is shipped in secure, leak-proof containers, compliant with biosafety and international shipping regulations for plant pathogens. The package includes appropriate labeling and documentation. Transport is typically conducted under temperature-controlled conditions to preserve viability, with delivery arranged via certified carriers specializing in biological materials. |
| Storage | Dickeya zeae, a plant pathogenic bacterium, should be stored in well-sealed containers under refrigeration (4°C) for short-term storage, or at -80°C in glycerol stocks for long-term preservation. Appropriate biosafety protocols must be followed, including clearly labeled containers and secure storage within a designated laboratory area to prevent accidental release and maintain culture viability. |
| Purity 99%: Dickeya Zeae with 99% purity is used in plant pathology assays, where it ensures consistent infection results in host differential studies. Viability ≥ 1x10⁸ CFU/mL: Dickeya Zeae at ≥ 1x10⁸ CFU/mL is used in laboratory greenhouse inoculation, where it provides robust disease development for resistance screening. Genomic Stability: Dickeya Zeae with confirmed genomic stability is used for comparative genomic studies, where it allows reliable identification of virulence factors. Cryopreserved Formulation: Dickeya Zeae in cryopreserved formulation is used for long-term reference strain preservation, where it maintains viability and pathogenicity over extended storage periods. Stability at 4°C: Dickeya Zeae stable at 4°C is used in field trial material transport, where it preserves bacterial activity until application. Cell Suspension, OD600=0.5: Dickeya Zeae in cell suspension at OD600=0.5 is used in tissue maceration experiments, where it achieves reproducible soft rot symptoms. Lyophilized Powder: Dickeya Zeae as lyophilized powder is used in diagnostic kit preparation, where it facilitates standardized reconstitution and precise dosing. Molecular Weight ~2.8 Mbp: Dickeya Zeae with a genome size of ~2.8 Mbp is used in molecular marker development, where it enables accurate pathogen identification assays. Heat Resistance up to 37°C: Dickeya Zeae with heat resistance up to 37°C is used in temperature-controlled pathogen stress studies, where it supports assessments of environmental adaptability. Serotype A: Dickeya Zeae serotype A is used in epidemiological surveillance programs, where it aids in tracking outbreak sources and pathogen diversity. |
Competitive Dickeya Zeae prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to admin@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: admin@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Our journey with Dickeya zeae started in the fermentation tanks, not in a boardroom. As the manufacturers, we face the questions about bacterial performance, longevity, and batch-to-batch reliability every day. Dickeya zeae draws a clear line between newly-isolated strains and tired lab clones. The difference traces back to its genetics and the way the culture responds under commercial-scale conditions. Many customers arrive after experiences with inconsistent purity or waning vitality in bacterial stocks from traders or lab-only suppliers. Most quickly see that Dickeya zeae, when grown under controlled, nutrient-optimized industrial settings, produces a consistent, active population that doesn’t fade out after the third passage.
Scaling up Dickeya zeae taught us a lot about what this organism needs. In flask conditions, it behaves well, but fermentation brings out nuances. Oxygen transfer and pH shifts play a huge role in toxin expression, which can affect not only product safety but also the liveliness of the cells. Through fine-tuning of agitation speed and controlled feeding, we reached stable yields. Even seemingly minor tweaks—such as order of adding particular carbon sources—made output change overnight. These process details can’t be replicated on the bench at a distributor’s warehouse. We never freeze-thaw these cultures without tracking their viability to make sure what leaves our tanks acts the same way as our reference batches.
It’s easy to get caught up comparing figures from different spec sheets. On paper, one Dickeya zeae looks just like another. Specs list CFUs per mL or mention absence of certain contaminants. But specs alone don’t tell the full story here. We routinely verify identity and vigor by running challenge tests against real hosts—often rice or corn—because a milliliter with high CFUs can mean little if those cells don’t proliferate in the plant environment. Our team checks for soft rot activity, pigment production, and stress response. This habit of field-relevant checks keeps us from falling for high-count, low-activity batches, and helps end-users avoid disappointment and waste.
Dickeya zeae is best known for its capacity to break down pectin and cause soft rot in a variety of crops. It’s a tool in plant pathology research, testing biocontrol agents or disease-resistant cultivars. We hear from university groups seeking vigorous, traceable strains for rice research, as well as multinationals looking to benchmark new microbicides in the lab. Crop pathology programs rely on true-to-type strains because subtle mutations shift virulence and response to agrochemicals. Those edge differences matter when research funding or crop seasons are on the line. Anybody can list Dickeya zeae in a catalog, but only a manufacturer actively growing and confirming strain characteristics knows which colonies will mimic field outbreaks and which won’t.
Live cultures come with real risks. Whether in fermentation or shipment, any temperature swing or contamination event can hit viability. Plenty of outside suppliers ignore this reality, sending off batches that remain stuck in customs too long or that see fungal contamination. These mistakes shrink population counts, ruin experimental reproducibility, and can even introduce new problems to a controlled trial. Our manufacturing protocols always include greenhouse validation before any new bulk batch ships, no matter how solid the initial tests appear. We invested in rapid-detection assays that flag unwanted species, including Pseudomonas and common molds, well before batches reach downstream users. These steps shield partners and projects from the slow damage that outright lab contamination causes.
Our Dickeya zeae line focuses on two central forms: vegetative cell suspensions and stabilized freeze-dried pellets. Researchers who need robust infection pressure for pathogenesis studies often request the fresh cell suspension. This format lets cells hit target tissues at peak activity. On the other hand, breeders evaluating long-term resistance or running delayed-start experiments favor the freeze-dried option. We optimized our methods to keep post-resuspension counts near the original, which isn’t trivial; lyophilization damages most bacteria’s membrane and metabolic systems if protocols cut corners. Years of dialed-in process control raised our recovery rates while keeping genetic drift in check.
Many concerns float around about mutated strains. The stories aren’t exaggerated—passaging Dickeya zeae outside its native context or holding it under suboptimal conditions unlocks genomic instability and new variants pop up fast. This isn’t a scare tactic. We’ve discarded entire batches showing altered colony morphology or changes in enzymatic profiles under soft-agar screening. Failing to catch these turns field trials and resistance screens into wasted effort. Long-term partners thank us more for transparency than for quick shipments. We developed a routinely-checked strain archive, where DNA fingerprints and aggressiveness screens keep us honest about what we’re propagating.
In academic work and agribusiness, customers want more than a tube with a label. They mention the need for documentation and batch traceability when recalls or project audits are reality. Every consignment receives a linked record, detailing seed culture lot, medium composition, and all test results from plating to pathogenicity trials. We’d rather answer tough questions now than see partners retracing steps after a trial falls apart. Our tech team provides direct troubleshooting advice, often helping remote staff adjust dilution rates or interpret lesion results when field conditions throw a curveball.
Dickeya zeae stands out from generic soft rot bacteria such as Pectobacterium, not only by its disease signature but also by the timing and spectrum of symptom development. Many providers lump these groups together, assuming cross-application in studies. Our records, backed by parallel inoculation trials, show that Pectobacterium doesn’t consistently produce the characteristic water-soaked lesions on rice and maize roots that Dickeya zeae does. True Dickeya-derived symptoms appear quicker and progress at a different rate under matched humidity and temperature. These real-world differences save time and money for researchers refining field protocols or looking for clear baselines in their disease resistance studies.
Questions about storage pop up all the time. It’s been tempting to stretch shelf life claims, but the reality is, Dickeya zeae doesn’t love week-long transport at ambient temperatures—no matter how advanced the packaging. Fresh cultures respond best to express shipment with temperature controls. We adopted cold pack protocols after seeing summer batch returns from arid regions with zero counts. Our freeze-dried stocks stand up better to rough shipping but still require prompt refrigeration upon arrival. There’s no escaping the impact of time and temperature here. Too many traders hide behind shelf life claims based on low initial counts, hoping to avoid responsibility when batches arrive dead. We’d rather flag the issue up front.
Dickeya zeae doesn’t threaten healthy adults under routine handling, yet careless protocols make it an issue for immunocompromised personnel or for co-contamination in crop operations. We refined our tank sanitization and air filtration to prevent any accidental release or mix-in with food or probiotic-grade cultures. Our facility design and staff protocols result from lived experience managing accidental spills and tough post-cleanup testing. We recommend that end-users with mixed-pathogen programs physically separate Dickeya activities and maintain solid handwashing and surface decontamination routines. These measures keep both personnel and data clean.
It’s easy to promise ‘same as last time’ outcomes, but only regular in-house auditing delivers it. We run parallel test plates and greenhouse virulence checks on every large batch to watch for shifts in aggressiveness and colony morphology. If a tank shows drift from our baseline, that lot doesn’t leave our building. Partners who rely on sequence-verified, phenotypically-stable cultures for long-term studies keep coming back. Our QMS ties each release back to archived reference samples—for both inoculum and media components—so any deviating report triggers a full scene reconstruction. These habits grow out of production-line reality, not just compliance rhymes.
As bacterial plant pathogens make headlines for hitting new territories, interest in Dickeya zeae research and crop screenings keeps expanding. Pathogen movement across borders, changes in climate, and new crop deployments all drive up demand for definable, well-supported strain stocks. We’ve seen seed companies request time-staggered releases of the same lot for real comparability in multi-year growouts, while new researchers often need mentor-style troubleshooting through their first rice lesion scoring. It falls to us, as the direct manufacturers, to guide field application rates or to flag mismatch risks in protocols developed overseas. Our team sees both conventional pathology screening and rapid-turnover screening projects, shaping what we plan for future releases.
We measure our success not by how little is reported back, but by the quality of corrections we can provide. When cultures won’t perform in a certain crop or climate, we dig into the shipping logs and growth data, working with end-users for honest answers. Our own batch failures—an unavoidable reality—shape the way we establish improvements, such as moving to better temperature data-loggers or adjusting lyophilization protectants and growth phase windows. Failures are reported, logged, and discussed openly within our team, never glossed over in pursuit of short-term numbers. This honest approach pays back over time as collaborative partners achieve genuinely useful results.
Direct manufacturer relationships make a tangible difference. Customers with urgent, large-volume orders for Dickeya zeae cultures benefit when we can reroute tanks or adjust fermenter schedules directly instead of chasing deliveries through layers of middlemen. Our built-in reporting and export oversight allows for upfront declarations that avoid compliance surprises at border crossings. We refuse to overextend supply commitments beyond our facility’s capability, keeping promises grounded and realistic.
Dickeya zeae’s role is shifting, as new molecular tools and emerging disease reports reshape research standards. We have focused R&D not just on producing more of the same, but on iteratively improving freeze-drying protection, real-time batch quality logging, and on-the-ground support material for end-users. With more gene-editing approaches and fast-tracked screening programs hitting the market, our manufacturing routines are sharpening to meet next-generation accuracy and reproducibility targets. Each production run feeds back data that informs our next round of tweaks, and we keep investing in both skilled staff and robust analytics.
Nobody who has handled real Dickeya zeae mistakes this organism for a generic plant rot culture. Its field performance, infection timeline, and host specificity set it apart, and those distinctions survive only when true-to-type strains are propagated directly, not recirculated through pipelines of distributors. Our approach—rooted in the practical realities of tanks, field checks, plant pathology, and direct troubleshooting—ensures that partners receive the culture, expertise, and continuity their studies or screening programs require. All of this draws on the daily lessons of direct manufacturing, not third-party packaging or reselling. Real product, real strain, real results—that continues to be the only sustainable way forward.