|
HS Code |
441279 |
| CAS_Number | 89397-08-2 |
| IUPAC_Name | 4-[(3E,5E)-3,7-dimethyl-3,5,7-octatrienyl]-2-methoxyphenol |
| Molecular_Formula | C18H24O2 |
| Molecular_Weight | 272.38 |
| Appearance | Yellow oily liquid |
| Solubility | Slightly soluble in water; soluble in organic solvents |
| Source | Cinnamomum cassia (Chinese cinnamon) |
| Synonyms | Cinnamylphenol, Cinncassiol A |
| Purity | Typically ≥98% |
| Storage_Temperature | Store at -20°C |
As an accredited Cinncassiol A factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Cinncassiol A is packaged in a 25 mg amber glass vial with a screw cap, labeled for research use only. |
| Shipping | Cinncassiol A is shipped in tightly sealed, chemical-resistant containers to prevent contamination and degradation. The package is clearly labeled, handled according to standard chemical transportation regulations, and kept away from moisture, heat, and direct sunlight. Appropriate documentation and safety data sheets accompany all shipments for regulatory compliance and safe handling. |
| Storage | Cinncassiol A should be stored in a tightly sealed container, protected from light and moisture, at a cool temperature (2–8°C). Avoid exposure to heat, direct sunlight, and oxidizing agents. Store in a well-ventilated, dry place away from incompatible materials. Proper storage ensures the compound's stability and preserves its chemical integrity for research or laboratory use. |
Applications of Cinncassiol A in Industrial ManufacturingAs an established manufacturer, we supply Cinncassiol A for critical uses across regulated sectors. Its unique phenylpropanoid structure, controlled purity, and batch-to-batch consistency underpin formulation reliability and finished product quality. Below, we present main industrial routes where clients rely on Cinncassiol A as an essential raw material and functional component. 1. Food Flavor and Aroma FormulationLeading food processing plants incorporate this material in natural flavor compounding, notably for spice and sweet-baking profiles. Its use demands careful compliance with food safety standards and accurate dose control for both sensory authenticity and consumer safety. Our product undergoes analytical release testing for residual solvents, pesticides, and heavy metals to satisfy strict intake tolerances on finished goods. Process technicians generally add the concentrate in post-extraction blending tanks, where its solubility and heat-stable profile allow direct incorporation into syrups, pasteurizable flavor bases, and confection coatings. Industry compliance standards
Typical usage ratio
Downstream process integration
Final product types
2. Pharmaceutical Intermediate for Antiinflammatory APIsPharmaceutical ingredient manufacturers use Cinncassiol A as a key upstream intermediate during synthesis of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents. Validated primary synthesis routes involve selective oxidation, followed by direct coupling to specific drug candidates. The material’s tracked impurity profile, controlled water content, and confirmed origin are critical for compliance with regulated manufacturing and process validation batches for DMF submission. Our GMP-standardized packaging prevents cross-contamination and ensures traceability for release into sterile and semi-sterile downstream syntheses. Industry compliance standards
Typical usage ratio
Downstream process integration
Final product types
3. Cosmetic Ingredient for Skin Conditioning and Fragrance BasesPersonal care formulators use Cinncassiol A in skin lotions and fragrances, leveraging its aromatic and conditioning functionality. Its profile enables inclusion under IFRA and national cosmetic guidelines. Quality control laboratories confirm absence of sensitizing impurities, dioxins, and other cosmetic-restricted substances in every batch. The ingredient is incorporated post-emulsification into fragrance solubilization blends, or after primary mixing in cold-process creams targeting high transparency and stability. Our packaging supports low-volatility handling for both large-scale and artisan batches. Industry compliance standards
Typical usage ratio
Downstream process integration
Final product types
4. Botanical Biopesticide FormulationLeading agricultural input producers utilize Cinncassiol A in formulating botanical biopesticides with target-specific pest mitigation. Its action focuses on select insect and fungal groups, with field trials establishing safe non-target effect profiles. Our fermentation-derived grades conform to ecotoxicological regulations and undergo multi-stage purification for minimal phytotoxin carry-over. Downstream manufacturing applies it in microencapsulated or emulsifiable concentrate formula, requiring stable dispersion in application tanks and compatibility with auxiliary adjuvants. Rigorous batch certification ensures mutual recognition in global markets. Industry compliance standards
Typical usage ratio
Downstream process integration
Final product types
|
Competitive Cinncassiol A prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to admin@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: admin@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Cinncassiol A has sparked growing interest in both academic circles and commercial markets, not only due to its botanical origin but also the proven benefits traced through years of consistent product development in-house. As a manufacturer with hands-on experience refining, scaling, and scrutinizing this compound, we see far beyond its basic chemical profile. We oversee every batch and have firsthand understanding of how reliable sourcing and methodical processing have shaped its identity.
The backbone of Cinncassiol A remains its origin: chiefly extracted from select Cinnamomum species using controlled, low-temperature distillation methods. By sticking with time-tested extraction methods—rooted in both our laboratory findings and continuous feedback from industrial partners—we’ve kept impurity levels consistently low and ensured a composition dominated by the active sesquiterpenoid. Other routes, such as aggressive solvent extractions or shortcuts during purification, tend to leave behind heavier residues or trace byproducts. From personal experience on the plant floor, each shortcut alters the output, sometimes in ways that only appear after scale-up. Our teams made the conscious choice years ago to maintain a slower, more methodical distillation, sacrificing speed for consistency and traceability.
Purity, as any seasoned chemist would agree, makes or breaks downstream performance. Most of the Cinncassiol A we send out measures above 98% purity using HPLC and GC-MS as standards. Why does that number matter in the “real world”? Years of feedback from paint formulators, pharmaceutical researchers, and food science partners tell us the story: off-flavors, haze, inconsistent phase separation, or unwanted side reactions often come from stray impurities. Even a minor lapse in quality control can multiply costs for clients who depend on batch-after-batch reliability. Our technical team tracks every fraction through in-process analytics, and we’ve set aside other business interests to protect that quality.
We know some resellers offer “natural cinnamon extract” or “volatile oil fraction” at a lower price, but their labeling seldom guarantees the fraction actually contains Cinncassiol A at the level clients expect. Situations arise—especially during supply crunches—where these loosely standardized fractions reach the market. After decades watching procurement cycles, we continue to believe that direct-from-manufacturer transparency remains irreplaceable. Those on the ground in production know that even a slight slip—wrong tree age, improper distillation duration, overheating—impacts the product profile.
Many of our direct partners in fine chemicals and specialty pharma came to us after struggling with inconsistency from bulk resellers. They needed more than just a shipment; they required a technical partner who could anticipate issues before they compounded costs. Cinncassiol A’s appeal covers several application spheres: an intermediate in the formulation of antifungal agents, a fragrance base for luxury perfumery, a flavor additive in specialty foods, and even a precursor in agrochemical synthesis. But each sector brings distinct demands.
A notable example: fragrance customers want Cinncassiol A without traces of certain aldehydes, which can spoil delicate top notes. Pharma developers insist on tight control over stereochemistry and processing solvents, since even low-level contaminants could jeopardize multi-stage syntheses. Food formulators need to know the material won’t introduce unexpected flavors or regulatory headaches. Our Q.C. runs adopt method setups that catch even trace oddities. We operate our labs as both a gate and a collaboration hub, passing findings directly to on-site teams, rather than clearing hurdles “at the dock.” Years of close partnership with downstream users has shaped this pragmatic workflow, weaving their challenges into our standard practices.
One of the key lessons from decades on the manufacturing floor: technical sheets only tell half the story. Cinncassiol A usually comes to our partners in clear, light yellow liquid form, showing a mild, spicy aroma characteristic of its botanical roots. The density typically ranges between 1.05 and 1.13 g/cm3 at 20°C, a detail critical for formulators dosing by weight or blending with other oils. Boiling point sits around 318-324°C, but actual volatility under process conditions often shifts depending on solvent use, application set-up, and integration technique. Water solubility remains extremely low, which demands thought around emulsification—for those incorporating it into water-forward systems like beverages or topical formulations.
Our QA/production teams run detailed checks not only for the headline numbers, but also for less obvious factors that show their significance over the long haul: flash point behavior, container compatibility, and performance under varying humidity or light exposure. In one project, unexpected discoloration in a batch stemmed from insufficient UV shielding during storage. The team implemented amber-glass protocols, which now come as standard on all shipments, refining processes that initially seemed “good enough.” Each tweak has grown from real lessons on the line or in end use, rather than off-the-shelf technical data.
Customers ask often about alternatives. You find other plant-derived aromatic components—cinnamaldehyde, eugenol, safrole—hashed out on bulk commodity lists, crossing over in use cases with Cinncassiol A in both flavor and fragrance industries. Beyond the obvious molecular differences, we’ve noticed from years of blending and formulating that Cinncassiol A offers a distinct thermal and oxidative stability profile. For instance, perfumers working with eugenol sometimes report rapid fading or color shifts in final blends, especially with extended shelf life. Cinncassiol A based blends, when processed with correct controls, resist these changes more reliably.
From a cost perspective, there are certainly cheaper natural components, but clients return to Cinncassiol A because of its nuanced aroma, unique performance as an intermediate, and reduced risk of regulatory warning flags. Cinnamaldehyde may be less expensive on the market, but feedback from our partners notes reproducible challenges—stronger sensitization, batch-to-batch color shifts, and instability in complex matrices. After running side-by-side comparative trials, entire formulating teams have shifted their approach. Not all alternate compounds fit the requirements for tight-tolerance applications or niche cosmetic bases where skin sensitivity counts as much as aroma profile.
Synthetic mimics exist, often born from attempts to relieve supply bottlenecks. Our feedback shows these products struggle to hit the natural product’s combination of potency, mildness, and sensory complexity. End users, particularly in therapeutic or personal care sectors, cite differences in overall sensory and functional experience—points those assembling a finished product ignore at their peril. Even slight divergences—trace off-odors or persistent bitter notes—change the narrative from “acceptable” to “optimal” in highly competitive markets.
As global pressures push both regulations and customer expectations higher, the issue of upstream traceability takes on new weight. Decades ago, transparency in botanical raw materials amounted to little more than a certificate of analysis and a generic origin statement. Now, clients—and regulators—demand a paper trail from seedling to shipment. We solved early issues with supply chain variability by owning the process end-to-end: contracted cultivation with certified growers, on-ground audits, digital inventory tracking, and seasonal review of harvest conditions.
Our experience with disrupted supply chains—weather disasters, geopolitical hurdles, manpower shortages—strengthened our commitment to deep traceability. When one storm wiped out a regional supply three years back, uncontracted competitors saw prices spike and quality fall. Because of our controlled sourcing, we maintained continuous supply and batch consistency. This sort of hard-won reliability isn’t apparent in a price quote or spec sheet, but our customers stay because they’ve lived through these shocks with us.
We also keep layered documentation, not just for regulatory compliance, but to create a feedback loop—engineering, procurement, and sales teams integrate insights into everything from next-season planting to maintenance on extraction vessels. These details matter most in crisis years. Investing in traceability software and establishing direct relationships takes time, but the result plays out in real-world stability and customer trust, rather than glossy marketing promises.
Few sectors face regulatory change as feverishly as botanical-based chemicals. Our team constantly reviews evolving frameworks around natural aromatics, from European directives governing food flavorings to shifting REACH and TSCA requirements in industrial contexts. Early on, regulatory surprises cost us dearly—recalls, relabeling, or reformulation wiped out months of work. From these experiences, strict internal audit protocols and multidisciplinary review—we include regulatory affairs folks in the earliest stages of process development—became our baseline.
The rise in consumer demand for “clean label” and traceable natural ingredients created both opportunity and burden. Standards once considered strict now read as bare minimum. We learned quickly to gather full documentation from day one: species authentication via barcode and irrefutable chain of custody for every shipment. Recent years mandated focus on avoiding cross-contamination with allergenic botanicals and complying with an international maze of product registrations. Ironically, some big upstream suppliers resist full transparency, pushing responsibilities onto customers. We hold the line on in-house chain-of-custody declarations and empower clients to audit—an arrangement that serves both commercial confidence and regulatory protection.
Many discoveries about Cinncassiol A happened not only in our labs, but at our customers’ factories and through joint trials. For example, research teams optimizing food preservatives or antimicrobial coatings pushed the parameters beyond what we originally intended. We support feasibility batches and supply out-of-spec or unrefined samples to research partners, collecting data from both successes and failures. Some of our enduring advances—like improved emulsification strategies or batch stability protocols—owe as much to partner feedback as to our technical know-how.
Emerging applications in anti-corrosive coatings, biocidal surface cleaners, or advanced encapsulation in nutraceuticals keep expanding what we thought possible. Internally, we set aside capacity for pilot programs, and our support staff keeps open lines of communication even as product customization demands rise. By pooling hands-on manufacturing expertise with application-side ingenuity, we’ve helped bridge gaps that synthetic-only or “generic natural” suppliers leave untouched. Many ingredients can check the box for “natural,” but few keep pace with evolving demands for specificity, reliability, and functional nuance.
In today’s market, claims around sustainability or “green chemistry” have become both shield and sword. We resist buzzwords and instead stack practical improvements over time. A few seasons back, soil depletion and waste biomass started impacting upstream output. So, we invested in field-level composting systems, changed harvesting schedules, and collaborated with growers to restore healthy soil cycles. Waste biomass from extraction now feeds back into local energy schemes rather than landfill.
Scaling a sustainable model taught us the hidden costs behind production—water use, solvent recycling, emissions tracking. We now implement energy-recovery steps at our distillation units, and our waste solvent stream runs through dedicated treatment instead of general disposal. Each innovation arose out of necessity, not branding, as we witnessed firsthand how environmental disruptions can ripple down the line. Recent years also saw us work closely with regional authorities on best practices, sometimes leading to tighter standards adopted across peer facilities.
Our teams host periodic review sessions, not just inside our walls, but with local communities and supply partners. By working alongside groups impacted by export trade or labor conditions, we’ve built a model anchored less by shiny sustainability pledges and more by real testable milestones.
Thirty years in manufacturing convinces you that real value never comes from commodity thinking. With every cycle, we prioritize reliability—batch to batch, season to season. Seeing how quickly fragile, loosely standardized supply lines unravel taught us the difference between scalable excellence and momentary cost savings. Armed with in-house analytics, rigorously trained staff, and a brutally honest view of both our successes and setbacks, we put out Cinncassiol A that reflects hard-fought lessons.
Everyone likes to think “natural” means better, but until the right controls exist from field to final fill, the ingredient risks underperforming. Our model—harvest, refine, test, ship—anchors its trust not in slogans, but in a history of open partnership, transparency, and thorough documentation. Those who share their challenges with us become collaborators, not numbers on a purchase order. Embedding such a mentality has brought us both scrutiny and loyalty in equal measure.
From first cut to last shipment, we treat Cinncassiol A not as a product on a sales sheet, but as a continuously evolving demonstration of industrial know-how. Year after year, we focus on what truly matters: real traceability, end-use adaptability, proven origin, unshakable batch consistency, and a willingness to grow with our partners. Cinncassiol A stands as both a technical achievement and a testament to what a tightly run, transparent manufacturing operation can achieve for those ready to demand more from a simple plant-derived ingredient.