|
HS Code |
453648 |
| Generic Name | Olaparib |
| Brand Names | Lynparza |
| Drug Class | PARP inhibitor |
| Dosage Forms | Tablet, Capsule |
| Route Of Administration | Oral |
| Indications | Ovarian cancer, breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer |
| Mechanism Of Action | Inhibits poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase enzymes |
| Half Life | 11-12 hours |
| Common Side Effects | Nausea, fatigue, anemia, vomiting, diarrhea |
| Contraindications | Hypersensitivity to olaparib |
| Prescription Status | Prescription only |
| Approval Year | 2014 |
| Manufacturer | AstraZeneca |
As an accredited Olaparib factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | The packaging for Olaparib, 150 mg, consists of a white HDPE bottle containing 120 film-coated tablets, labeled with product details. |
| Shipping | Olaparib is shipped in accordance with regulatory guidelines for pharmaceutical compounds. It is securely packaged in airtight, moisture-resistant containers to maintain stability and prevent contamination. Temperature controls may be applied as per storage requirements, and all shipments include appropriate labeling, documentation, and handling instructions to ensure safe and compliant delivery. |
| Storage | Olaparib should be stored at a temperature between 20°C and 25°C (68°F to 77°F), away from excessive heat, moisture, and direct light. It must be kept in its original, tightly closed container and out of reach of children and pets. Avoid refrigeration or freezing, and do not store in the bathroom. Follow any additional manufacturer instructions for safe storage. |
|
Purity 99%: Olaparib Purity 99% is used in targeted cancer therapy formulations, where it provides high efficacy in BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer treatment. Molecular Weight 434.46 g/mol: Olaparib Molecular Weight 434.46 g/mol is used in oral solid dosage development, where it enables accurate dosing and formulation consistency. Particle Size <10 microns: Olaparib Particle Size <10 microns is used in nanoparticle drug delivery systems, where it improves bioavailability and absorption rates. Stability Temperature 25°C: Olaparib Stability Temperature 25°C is used in long-term pharmaceutical storage applications, where it ensures maintained potency and shelf life. Solubility in DMSO 50 mg/mL: Olaparib Solubility in DMSO 50 mg/mL is used in in vitro cellular assay setups, where it allows for high concentration stock solutions. Melting Point 194-196°C: Olaparib Melting Point 194-196°C is used in heat-stable formulation processes, where it supports thermal processing without degradation. Viscosity Grade Low: Olaparib Viscosity Grade Low is used in liquid suspension preparations, where it facilitates easy mixing and uniform distribution. |
Competitive Olaparib prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to admin@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: admin@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
In cancer treatment, progress sometimes means moving away from a one-size-fits-all idea. Olaparib stands as one of those important shifts. This medication, a PARP inhibitor, brings real-world promise for many patients facing cancers like ovarian, breast, and prostate that carry certain genetic mutations, notably BRCA1 and BRCA2.
Olaparib works in a way that feels tangible for people trying to understand next-generation therapies. Instead of just killing fast-growing cells like older chemotherapy, it targets a weakness in cancer cell DNA repair. People with BRCA mutations depend on a repair system that Olaparib blocks. This means cancer cells struggle to fix themselves and eventually die off. For those whose cancer returns after rounds of prior treatments, Olaparib can give another line of hope.
Given as an oral tablet or capsule, Olaparib fits into daily life more easily than infusions at a hospital. The tablets typically come in 100 mg and 150 mg strengths, allowing some flexibility. Most patients take it twice daily with or without food, which helps keep drug levels steady. Though this sounds simple, it demands discipline—skipping doses can lead to weaker results, and mistakes with dosing could lead to unnecessary side effects.
Olaparib is not the first targeted therapy to hit the market, but it is among the first in its class. PARP inhibitors as a group go after the tumor’s DNA repair machinery, but Olaparib showed its value early on in pivotal studies. In ovarian cancer, patients with previous treatment failures saw longer periods without disease progression when taking Olaparib than with a placebo. The data here aren’t abstract—people have seen months, sometimes even years, of valuable extra time with fewer hospital visits compared to some IV chemotherapy regimens.
Comparison to traditional chemotherapies brings clear differences. Chemotherapies attack all rapidly dividing cells, which leads to major side effects like hair loss, major fatigue, and higher risk of infection. With Olaparib, most patients report fatigue and mild blood count changes, but hair loss is rare, and daily living can go on with relatively fewer interruptions. This means the medication is not just effective in the lab but also more tolerable during the hard grind of daily cancer treatment.
The growing importance of genetic testing in cancer care shows up here. Before starting Olaparib, patients usually need to undergo genetic testing for BRCA mutations—not only to improve the odds that the medication will help, but also to avoid exposing people to unnecessary risks. If a person does not carry these mutations, the medicine probably won’t make a meaningful difference. Oncology teams describe real-world cases where a test for BRCA changed the entire treatment plan, shifting from older, harsher drugs to targeted therapy.
Some might wonder if this approach only serves a subset of people with access to genetic testing. While disparities still exist, more hospitals and cancer centers offer affordable or insurance-covered testing as the significance of these findings grows clearer. It’s not rare now for a patient who lived with undiagnosed breast cancer to undergo genetic counseling and find a new direction because of it.
No medication feels like a magic bullet, and Olaparib is not above criticism. The side effects can be real: nausea, tiredness, low red blood cell counts, and, rarely, new treatments needed for secondary complications like pneumonia. Some patients need regular blood work to catch problems early. The benefit lies in the balance—side effects mostly show up early and level off, and doctors adjust dosing to limit trouble. In clinical practice, most patients say these issues feel manageable next to the constant sickness of older drugs.
For some, the possibility of living longer with a chronic cancer feels both like a blessing and a source of anxiety. Taking pills every day keeps cancer top-of-mind, and some patients struggle with the daily reminder of illness. But for others, oral tablets mean they avoid needles and can travel or work almost as before diagnosis. I have spoken to survivors who credit these options for giving them another shot at normal days. Family dinners and work events no longer feel off-limits due to cycles of exhaustion and immune system crashes.
Other PARP inhibitors exist, such as niraparib and rucaparib. Each medication shares a common mode of attack, but Olaparib benefits from being first-to-market and from better data in certain cancers. Olaparib’s tablet formulation stands out in terms of convenience. Its labeling covers both initial treatment and maintenance after other therapies, while some competitors stick mainly to relapse settings.
Dosing patterns can differ as well. Olaparib aims for straightforward regimens—twice-daily tablets without special food rules. Some competitors require careful calorie tracking or split dosing. Surveys among oncology nurses and pharmacists point out that simpler dosing makes it easier for patients to stay on track. Lower rates of certain side effects, such as hypertension or insomnia, appear in some studies of Olaparib, tipping the balance for some doctors and patients in its favor.
Cost remains a huge barrier for many needing cancer care. Like most advanced therapies, Olaparib comes with a heavy price tag, and insurance coverage varies by health system and country. In the United States, copay assistance programs might ease the burden, but for the uninsured or underinsured, the price can look impossibly high. In countries with nationalized healthcare, like the UK, Olaparib is often available on specific criteria, thanks to public negotiations based on data for clinical benefit.
In my own experience navigating cancer care, financial toxicity plays a real and lingering role in treatment choice. Many patients describe juggling paperwork, phone calls, and confusing co-insurance rules on top of everything else. In spite of these challenges, advocacy groups and nonprofit organizations have stepped up, connecting patients to grants and informed counselors. A persistent push for increased awareness and transparency in drug pricing would help more people see the value of precision medicine without bankrupting their families.
It’s easy to get lost in data tables and clinical trial reports, but sitting face-to-face with patients tells a clearer story. An older woman with recurrent ovarian cancer, exhausted by years of IV chemo, shares her gratitude for a pill she can take at home. A father with metastatic prostate cancer tells friends how being able to stay at work longer helped him see a daughter’s graduation. Stories like these underscore why access to therapies such as Olaparib should matter to all of us.
Doctors and nurses bring these stories to light at medical conferences, in peer-reviewed journals, and even in hospital break rooms, sharing the details about who benefits most from Olaparib and what side effects led to headaches on the ground. Many specialists use these real-life insights to fine-tune which patients should try this route first, and which may need an alternative. The difference between published trial results and actual day-to-day living often hinges on close observation, patient support teams, and a willingness to adjust as needs change.
Research continues to dig into new uses for Olaparib, both as a solo treatment and combined with other medications. Ongoing studies look at earlier use in disease and combining with immune therapies. A few trials target even those without BRCA mutations, aiming to find new genetic footprints that respond well. If proven, this could widen the benefit, reaching more people than ever expected. Every new trial brings renewed hope to those living with stubborn, advanced cancers that refuse to respond to older drugs.
Still, caution matters. Tumors sometimes adapt, finding workarounds to keep repairing themselves. Resistance to therapy emerges after months or even years, not unlike the story of antibiotics in infectious disease. Some patients need to change medications or add other treatments. A dedicated research community, backed by patients willing to join clinical trials, now stands at the center of further progress. I have found skeptics and optimists both have a point—progress for some can mean slow and uneven steps for others, with the path forward rarely straightforward.
The story of Olaparib brings out bigger issues facing healthcare. Access to precision medicines remains uneven, with wealthier and urban centers quicker to embrace new tests and treatments than rural or disadvantaged communities. Building on efforts to spread knowledge about genetic testing, simplify insurance approval, and connect more patients to advanced care could make real differences. Some clinics already pair genetic counselors with oncology teams to explain choices and catch pitfalls, but wider adoption would bring these benefits to more patients. Openness about side effects, insurance battles, and daily living realities makes a difference when communities face decisions about funding and resources.
Doctors now face questions from patients who come in with research in hand, sometimes asking for Olaparib by name after seeing stories or reading about its promise. This shift toward patient empowerment feels important—cures might not be certain, but control over care means a great deal. As someone who has walked with families through cancer journeys, the message is consistent: information helps patients and families weather the unknowns with more purpose and comfort.
Progress doesn't happen only in the lab. Advocacy led by patients, survivors, and clinicians forms the backbone of pushing forward new standards. In the case of Olaparib, strong voices pushed for broader cancer genetic testing, supported expanded insurance policies, and helped fund research. Some organizations now set up patient navigation programs so no one has to figure out the steps alone: from genetic counseling, to medication access, to coping with daily pills and their side effects. The shift from faceless clinical research to community-driven care makes a huge difference in real outcomes.
Education goes far beyond pamphlets in a doctor’s office. Online forums, survivor stories, and workshops empower families with real questions to ask about medications like Olaparib. Knowing what to expect, what warning signs to look for, and when to push for new options can shift the outcome. As trust builds between patients and care teams, more open conversations replace the one-sided lectures of years past. Collective knowledge, lived experience, and shared decision-making turn cancer care into a partnership, not just a prescription.
Every innovation in medicine tells a story about hope, challenge, and balancing risk with reward. Olaparib illustrates this journey for families and care teams facing certain cancers driven by faulty genetics. Its rise into standard care reflects ongoing trust in personalized medicine and the collective power of patients, providers, and researchers. For many, it offers more time—time for connection, for life events, and for fighting cancer with fewer disruptions. The future for targeted therapies will rely on what Olaparib’s story teaches: listening to patients, supporting access, and never mistaking statistics for the full picture of human health.