|
HS Code |
759018 |
| Generic Name | Edaravone |
| Chemical Formula | C10H10N2O |
| Molecular Weight | 164.2 g/mol |
| Dosage Form | Injection |
| Approved Use | Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) |
| Route Of Administration | Intravenous |
| Mechanism Of Action | Free radical scavenger |
| Brand Names | Radicava, MCI-186 |
| Half Life | 4.5 to 6 hours |
| Origin | Japan |
| Appearance | White crystalline powder |
| Storage Conditions | Room temperature, protect from light |
As an accredited Edaravone factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Edaravone packaging features a 20 mg/20 mL clear glass vial, labeled with concentration details, manufacturer's logo, and storage instructions. |
| Shipping | Edaravone is shipped in tightly sealed containers, protected from light and moisture. It is typically transported at controlled room temperature and handled with care as a pharmaceutical or research chemical. Regulatory guidelines for hazardous substances may apply. Ensure all packaging is labeled appropriately for safe handling and compliance with shipping regulations. |
| Storage | Edaravone should be stored in a tightly closed container at 20°C to 25°C (68°F to 77°F), protected from light and moisture. Keep it away from incompatible substances and out of reach of children. Avoid exposure to extreme temperatures. Proper storage ensures the stability and efficacy of edaravone, reducing the risk of degradation or contamination. |
|
Purity 99%: Edaravone with a purity of 99% is used in acute ischemic stroke therapy, where high purity ensures consistent neuroprotective efficacy. Stability Temperature 25°C: Edaravone at a stability temperature of 25°C is used in pharmaceutical formulations, where stable storage maintains therapeutic activity. Molecular Weight 174.2 g/mol: Edaravone with a molecular weight of 174.2 g/mol is used in injectable preparations, where precise dosing accuracy is achieved. Melting Point 129-130°C: Edaravone with a melting point of 129-130°C is used in solid-state drug design, where suitable melting characteristics support efficient processing. Particle Size 10 μm: Edaravone with a particle size of 10 μm is used in oral suspension development, where fine particles improve dissolution rate and bioavailability. Solubility in Water 0.22 mg/mL: Edaravone with a solubility in water of 0.22 mg/mL is used in intravenous formulations, where controlled solubility minimizes precipitation risk. pKa 7.0: Edaravone with a pKa of 7.0 is used in pH-sensitive delivery systems, where optimal pKa supports effective drug absorption. Optical Rotation Neutral: Edaravone with neutral optical rotation is used in racemic drug studies, where stereoisomeric composition ensures reproducible pharmacodynamics. |
Competitive Edaravone prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to admin@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: admin@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
As someone who keeps an eye on trends in neurological care, I've seen how much frustration surrounds the search for new therapies. Many drugs come and go. Very few step up and actually change what doctors can offer patients—not just in rare cases, but for people facing real battles every day. Edaravone promises to do just that. For anyone who wrestles with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) or has watched a loved one’s health slip after a stroke, this isn’t just a name on a box. It’s a sign that new approaches exist, that research and innovation are making a real difference.
Edaravone’s story sets it apart right away. Unlike so many drugs whose journeys begin and end in the same research pipeline, Edaravone gained notice for crossing boundaries—moving from the field of acute stroke management in Japan to wider use in ALS around the world. The reason? The way it takes on oxidative stress, that chain reaction in the body where free radicals break down cells quicker than they can heal. Doctors and patients both know oxidative stress is no small thing in neurodegenerative disease. When it undermines nerve cells, function disappears, muscles weaken, and hope can get lost in the fog.
Edaravone acts as a free radical scavenger. That sounds like a technical term but in everyday language, it means the medicine helps protect the body’s nervous system from the relentless attack of oxidative molecules. I’ve read dozens of studies around neuroprotection and the field is littered with false starts, drugs that looked promising in mice but failed for people. Edaravone is one of those rare drugs that translated that early promise into actual, real-life improvement—not a cure, but an intervention that slows the breakdown process.
It’s easy to get lost in the weeds of pharmaceutical forms and delivery methods, but for Edaravone, the standard model is an intravenous (IV) solution. Each dosage comes carefully measured to deliver a set amount of active ingredient, which clinical trials determined as safe and effective based on measurable outcomes—namely, slowing loss of function in ALS patients over several months.
For doctors, that means administering Edaravone in a hospital or clinic setting. Patients receive infusions over several sessions, following a rhythm of initial daily doses for a few weeks, then intervals between courses of treatment. There are reasons behind this approach. It ensures that the body gets a steady supply of the active agent, giving patients a real chance to benefit. From what I’ve seen, the science behind these dosing intervals comes from a balance between safety, practicality, and evidence—a rare balance that not every medication achieves.
Walking through the aisles of neurology conferences, drugs get thrown around like buzzwords—most promise big things, few deliver. Edaravone’s distinctive place comes from two factors: its original Japanese approval for acute stroke, and its credibility as an ALS treatment backed by double-blind controlled trials. That combination is unusual.
Plenty of treatments for ALS focus on symptom management or slow the course slightly, but Edaravone was the first to show a statistically significant slow-down in patient decline, using standards that experts actually trust. Improvements didn’t just show up in numbers on a chart—patients noted they could dress themselves or feed themselves a few months longer. In a field marked by gradual decline, even a few months matter immensely. Unlike oral riluzole, another mainstay for ALS, Edaravone’s intravenous form offers its own set of practical challenges—regular IV infusion can wear on patients and caregivers alike, but the payoff is there when the benefits show up physically.
Neurology is tough. Most patients and families come in expecting a miracle, but the hard truth is many neurodegenerative disorders still lack effective treatments. Edaravone doesn’t rewrite that script entirely, but it alters the tone of the conversation. After so many setbacks in ALS therapy—after decades with nothing but supportive care and riluzole—people now have a tool that works differently. It targets the cell destruction at one of its roots, reducing damage from oxidative stress.
ALS is rare, but its personal impact is huge. I’ve met families who’ve watched hope slip away after a diagnosis. They take anything that extends independence, and Edaravone offers that. It doesn’t save every patient, nor does it work equally well for everyone, but pooling results from different studies shows a clear benefit for some. Even in stroke recovery, where new therapies rarely get approved, Edaravone’s mechanism holds promise. Clinical guidelines still debate its global place in acute stroke management, but Japan’s experience highlights differences in healthcare systems and regulation—sometimes what works in one country faces higher hurdles abroad.
Every new medication comes with pros and cons. Edaravone's real-world impact shows up most clearly in the way neurologists choose their options. Patients face hard choices: stick with the old standards or try something newer, with frequent infusions and more follow-up. Those who’ve used the medication—either in Japan, where it’s been on the market for years, or in the US and Europe, since its approval—report noticeable changes in strength and daily function. Doctors track small improvements with the ALSFRS-R scale, but loved ones see it in the ability to brush teeth or go for a walk.
Long-term, the hope is that Edaravone becomes only an early step. Its success helped push pharma companies and scientists to think more creatively about ALS, to go after free radicals, inflammation, and the micro-level failures of dying neurons. When a drug moves the needle, regulators notice, investors back new research, and patients are the real winners. Instead of stagnating in the status quo, ALS clinical trials now target new mechanisms, with Edaravone as proof that these ideas can actually succeed outside of the lab.
The tough part is access. Intravenous medication isn’t simple for many patients. Scheduling infusions takes coordination, and travel is rough for people with advanced weakness. Families often shoulder the burden. Some clinics find creative ways to help—offering mobile nurse visits or grouping appointments to ease transportation. Payers, both private and public, weigh the costs and debate coverage. In my experience, open communication between neurologists, patients, and insurance teams goes a long way. People who understand the daily reality of ALS know—every day of function is worth fighting for.
Researchers and pharmaceutical engineers continue working on better forms of Edaravone. Oral formulations have been a key focus. Japan recently approved an oral suspension making dosing far easier. Other countries are evaluating this change. Once the oral form gets green-lit in more markets, more patients can access it without the logistical hurdles of an IV line. This evolution reflects an important lesson: patient-friendly delivery transforms the reach of even the most effective medications.
Pricing still creates friction. Like most new therapies, Edaravone comes at a premium, with real-world accessibility depending on national healthcare coverage or private insurance. Solutions aren’t easy—some groups advocate for expanded subsidies, generics, or patient support programs. Others focus on policy change, pushing for broader inclusion of ALS therapies in public funding lists. No easy answers exist, but shining a light on these gaps brings more pressure for change.
Comparisons shape perception, so I’ve watched closely as Edaravone gets stacked up against riluzole, the only other long-standing ALS drug. Riluzole works mainly by blocking glutamate activity in the nervous system, and data shows it can stretch life expectancy by a few months. Edaravone stands alone for its targeted defense against oxidative stress. Used together, these medications can form a two-pronged approach—tamping down excitotoxicity and scavenging free radicals. Some neurologists recommend both, seeing the combo as greater than the sum of its parts.
On a practical level, riluzole takes the prize for convenience because of its oral formulation, but it never brought the function-preserving changes that Edaravone demonstrated in trials. For patients with rapidly progressing ALS or for those early in the disease, Edaravone’s potential benefit often outweighs its logistical headache.
Looking forward, the pipeline for ALS therapies is crowded with hopefuls: antisense oligonucleotides, gene therapies, and stem cell advances. Edaravone stands as the benchmark any new medication must surpass, both in measurable function and real-life benefit. Its presence in guidelines and insurance formularies signals that oxidative stress is a battle worth fighting—not just as a theory, but as practical, everyday care.
No medicine is risk-free. Edaravone is no exception, though its side effect profile is generally manageable for most. The clinical trials that led to its approval tracked common concerns—bruising at the IV site, some headache, skin reactions, and, for a few, allergic responses. For people with asthma or allergic tendencies, clinicians keep a close watch. The vast majority tolerate the drug well, especially compared to the risks of unchecked ALS progression.
Real-world experience matters as much as numbers in a medical journal. I’ve listened to families weigh the inconvenience against the possible benefit. Most decide to proceed, knowing the landscape of ALS is tilted toward rapid decline. As the oral form becomes available, hesitancy may drop, and the reach of Edaravone could expand even further.
In medicine, nothing counts more than good evidence. Edaravone’s journey from concept to approval followed the tough path: phase II and III trials, double blinding, peer-reviewed publication, and scrutiny from national and international regulators. The key ALS study, run in Japan, measured the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) and found that patients retained more function over time. These results weren’t just a statistical trick—they became the turning point in unlocking global approvals.
Skeptics always exist, particularly in countries with different patient populations or healthcare resources. Follow-up research in North America and Europe continues to evaluate long-term outcomes, combinations with other drugs, and different dosing regimens. Ongoing studies look for better ways to identify which patients respond best, with genetic and biomarker analysis shaping future clinical decision-making. Unlike many therapies that flop after initial excitement, Edaravone built its reputation through reproducible, transparent findings.
People who work inside healthcare know that breakthroughs aren’t just about statistics. They’re about restoring some control to patients—giving back pieces of daily life that disease steals away. Edaravone changes the outlook for some people with ALS, offering more good days and more independence. That difference reverberates through families, caregivers, and the community at large. Old advice called to “wait for science to catch up.” Now, with Edaravone and the therapies it has inspired, people see real progress.
ALS researchers, once stuck fighting the same battles, now see proof that new mechanisms can matter. Drug development is risky and slow, with more disappointments than successes, but every win opens new doors. Pharmaceutical innovation requires commitment—both from companies and the public sector. By supporting therapies like Edaravone, funding more research, and demanding policies that favor access, society pushes the line of possibility outward.
For families confronting ALS or stroke, every day brings tough decisions. Edaravone represents more than another prescription—it marks an expansion in options, a signal that slowing neurodegeneration is no longer just an ideal. As new formulations make treatment simpler and as ongoing research fine-tunes its use, patients and doctors are better equipped for the fight. Even for those unable to access Edaravone, knowing these developments exist offers hope: eventually, the tide can turn, not just for ALS but for other neurodegenerative diseases driven by similar mechanisms.
Staying informed about therapies like Edaravone is key. Neurologists, nurses, and primary doctors need clear communication and updated guidelines. Many health systems are now encouraging multidisciplinary clinics, where neurologists, nutritionists, therapists, and social workers pull together to create comprehensive care plans. Edaravone fits perfectly into this landscape—where innovation, collaboration, and a willingness to challenge the status quo drive better outcomes.
Every successful drug risks turning into a buzzword, but Edaravone’s reputation rests on consistent results and the experience of people whose lives it changed. Critics point to remaining questions: which patients benefit most? Which combinations work best? What happens after years of use? The story isn’t finished. In my own experience, I’ve found honest conversations with patients matter most. Hope fueled by science, and realistic about the limits, sets the stage for shared decision-making.
Media sometimes reduces new drugs to miracle stories or cautionary tales. The truth for Edaravone lies somewhere in between. It opened the door for real progress in ALS, challenged the boundaries of neuroprotection, and set a new bar for future medicines. Advocacy groups, researchers, and patients together shape its legacy—demanding both access and the next generation of breakthroughs.
Drug development never stands still. Edaravone’s arrival energized the field, but the journey continues: oral options, expanded indications for stroke or other disorders, and personalized medicine approaches that target neurodegeneration at its source. Every gain builds confidence, propels more funding, and, most importantly, translates into longer, better periods of independence for patients.
Sifting through the headlines and research summaries, Edaravone stands apart for its real-world impact, scientific foundations, and the hope it offers in diseases once thought unyielding. Over time, the expanding story of Edaravone will keep testing how healthcare systems, policy makers, and the public value progress—not just in numbers, but in lived, daily experience.