|
HS Code |
731529 |
| Product Name | Sodium 5-Bromo-4-Chloro-3-Indolyl-Β-D-Glucuronide |
| Abbreviation | X-Gluc |
| Molecular Formula | C14H12BrClNNaO7 |
| Molecular Weight | 444.60 g/mol |
| Appearance | White to off-white powder |
| Solubility | Soluble in water, DMSO, DMF |
| Storage Temperature | -20°C |
| Application | Substrate for β-glucuronidase (GUS) detection |
| Cas Number | 18656-96-7 |
| Sensitivity | Highly sensitive chromogenic substrate |
| Maximum Absorbance | 615 nm (after enzymatic reaction) |
| Synonyms | X-Gluc, BCIG, XGluc, BCI-Gluc |
As an accredited Sodium 5-Bromo-4-Chloro-3-Indolyl-Β-D-Glucuronide factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | |
| Shipping | |
| Storage |
Competitive Sodium 5-Bromo-4-Chloro-3-Indolyl-Β-D-Glucuronide prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to admin@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: admin@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Scientists and technicians working in the realms of microbiology and molecular biology face a simple but stubborn challenge: confirming the presence or activity of β-glucuronidase in their samples. A clean, unmistakable visual readout makes all the difference between ambiguous results and clear-cut findings. Over the years, the search for straightforward, accurate substrates led many in the field toward Sodium 5-Bromo-4-Chloro-3-Indolyl-Β-D-Glucuronide, often known by its abbreviation, X-Gluc. This compound has earned a solid reputation for producing crisp blue color changes in the presence of β-glucuronidase positive organisms. My own experience growing Escherichia coli strains has shown that X-Gluc saves time and trims down the risk of subjective interpretation, helping laboratories reduce errors and improve confidence in their data.
For those of us elbow-deep in agar plates, chemical shorthand makes life easier. X-Gluc reveals its role with its chemical structure, introducing a chlorinated and brominated indolyl group paired with a glucuronic acid moiety at the β-position. This precise coupling allows β-glucuronidase, an enzyme produced by certain bacteria like E. coli, to break the substrate, spurring a reaction that leaves a blue precipitate behind. It’s more than just a fancy trick—this color formation marks a binary distinction. Blue? The target enzyme is alive and kicking. No color? Time to check the negative controls. Such a built-in reporting function saves precious hours, especially in high-throughput settings where plate after plate lines up to be scanned.
X-Gluc remains chemically stable when stored away from light and moisture, supplied as a pale powder that dissolves well in water or DMSO. A typical working concentration hovers between 40 and 100 µg/mL, balancing sensitivity and background noise, though experienced users often optimize concentration depending on bacterial density and growth conditions. Its melting point and solubility figures sometimes pop up on data sheets, but in practice, what matters is that once in solution, it integrates into agar or liquid media without fuss. I’ve run side-by-side tests with other chromogenic substrates and found X-Gluc to deliver sharper blue color and quicker response, particularly in samples with marginal glucuronidase levels.
It’s easy to overlook the chemistry hidden behind a single blue colony. X-Gluc’s design grew out of refinements in indolyl-based substrates—an upgrade over older, less reliable options like phenolphthalein glucuronide. Chemists added a bromo and chloro group to the indole ring, boosting substrate stability and electron affinity. Once the enzyme cleaves the glycosidic bond, the resulting indoxyl compound rapidly oxidizes and dimerizes in the presence of oxygen, forming an insoluble blue dye. This reaction proves robust; plates show clear results in just a few hours. As someone who’s tallied thousands of colonies, having a substrate that keeps its promise every time makes benchwork a lot less stressful.
People often associate X-Gluc with environmental testing, screening water or food samples for E. coli contamination. That’s a fair connection, since public health agencies regularly draw on X-Gluc for regulatory compliance and outbreak response. The substrate is not just a niche reagent—its application radiates outward into hospital labs checking for E. coli in urine or wound samples, or plant geneticists running GUS reporter gene assays in transgenic tissues. I once followed a protocol at a university greenhouse where X-Gluc staining reliably mapped out gene expression patterns in roots and leaves, revealing blue streaks that mirrored antiviral gene activation. In academic and industrial settings alike, the utility of this substrate flows from its flexible chemistry and readable results.
On the surface, substrate chemistry looks crowded. Plenty of chromogens and fluorogens vie for attention on lab benches. Yet, X-Gluc carves out its spot for a handful of practical reasons. Among other common choices, like 4-Methylumbelliferyl-β-D-glucuronide (MUG), X-Gluc is unique in delivering visible results without requiring UV transilluminators or special imaging devices. MUG, for instance, yields fluorescent rather than colored products, requiring extra steps and equipment. That’s a bottleneck in field-based applications. X-Gluc plates just need ambient light and sharp eyes. Compared to chemicals like ONPG, which detect β-galactosidase activity and lack specificity for β-glucuronidase, X-Gluc avoids cross-reactivity headaches. This selectivity makes it the substrate of choice for teams needing to distinguish between closely related bacterial enzymes.
Even the most popular substrates aren’t perfect. Some folks report faint background color if their agar formulation or water source contains certain trace metals or contaminants. Others see sluggish blue development under suboptimal incubation. These issues rarely derail experiments outright, but they can chip away at confidence in results. Over the years, most of these headaches tie back to the quality of reagents and plate preparation steps. Freshly made X-Gluc solutions help, as does testing different batches of agar to weed out unwanted chemical interactions. Focusing on these details has consistently brought my own experiments back into line. Experienced users quickly spot off-color plates and run blanks to weed out background noise.
Scale changes the game in microbiology. Screening a handful of samples calls for a reliable result, but dozens or hundreds of plates magnify the consequences of error. In automated labs pushing through clinical samples or environmental assays, the speed and ease of X-Gluc’s color development matter just as much as its chemistry. There’s less guesswork, since blue colonies stand apart from a white or off-white background. That directness saves time reading plates and reduces dependence on subjective judgment, a major win for accuracy. For years, I’ve watched technicians move from 10-sample runs to 500-sample streaks, and the consistent appearance of blue-indicative colonies enables both small labs and industrial-scale operations to reach decisions faster, with greater certainty.
The safety of public water holds profound importance for health and economic stability. X-Gluc streamlines the detection of potentially dangerous E. coli strains. When regulatory bodies or local water authorities launch surveillance programs, they need a substrate that eliminates ambiguity. X-Gluc’s colorimetric response fits right in, providing a razor-sharp line between positive and negative findings. The World Health Organization and other health agencies regularly include this substrate in their standard protocols for water quality, owing to its ability to deliver reliable readouts across a range of sample types. These assurances allow agencies to rapidly declare water sources safe or order deeper investigations. As someone who worked on a water testing project following seasonal floods, I found X-Gluc transformed potentially complex batch screening into an approachable, effective workflow.
Introducing any chemical into routine lab work brings up safety questions. X-Gluc, while generally regarded as low-hazard with standard handling, calls for the same respect as other synthetic organics. Lab safety officers remind staff to avoid skin contact, use gloves, and handle powders in well-ventilated areas. Proper disposal matters: spent media and residual powder must go through approved waste streams—never down the drain. Practical experience has shown that training new staff to treat all reagents with consistent care helps prevent accidents and minimizes environmental impact. These sensible practices fit hand-in-glove with widespread efforts to build greener, safer workspaces without giving up search sensitivity or result quality.
The use of X-Gluc isn’t confined to bacteria. Plant science, especially in developmental biology and genetic engineering, leans heavily on the GUS (β-glucuronidase) reporter system. Transgenic plants carrying the gusA gene break down X-Gluc and develop striking blue patterns that map promoter activity and gene function in living tissues. From Arabidopsis seedlings to maize roots and tobacco leaves, blue staining reveals insights not possible with broader indicators. My time with plant-focused labs reinforced how a single substrate, used consistently across protocols, brings experiments together, enabling real comparisons across studies and keeping scientific communication honest. These GUS assays let scientists track and compare gene expression patterns with confidence, supporting larger breakthroughs in crop improvement and basic biology.
Competitive products have risen in response to expanding research needs. Some employ fluorogenic substrates, yielding sharp outputs under UV lamps, while others focus on multi-enzyme detection or multiplexing. Those options sound attractive on paper but come at a cost—fluorogenic kits add expense and require specialized equipment most field labs lack. With X-Gluc, all it takes is basic labware and visible light. For many users, this low barrier to entry beats out projector-based fluorescence or lateral flow systems. I’ve sat through procurement meetings where the comparison came down to price, storage, and operator ease; time and again, X-Gluc came out as a direct, cost-conscious solution that didn’t put demands on existing infrastructure.
Quality swings noticeably between suppliers, affecting batch consistency and purity. Given the sensitivity of colorimetric assays, impurities or incorrect storage can erode the substrate's performance. Laboratories committed to reproducible research invest time in benchmarking new lots, running positive and negative controls on each delivery batch. This practice grows from lived experience—the peace of mind that comes with dependable, repeatable results. Documentation, traceability, and supplier transparency matter far more than price alone. For research teams, forming lasting relationships with trusted suppliers keeps projects on schedule and shields against the risk of supply chain surprises.
Budgets remain tight even as research expectations jump higher. X-Gluc, while not the cheapest chemical on the shelf, delivers long-term value with reliable performance and broad compatibility with existing media. Labs can purchase it in small or bulk amounts, scaling up or down according to project size. Open access to supply means both public and private sector labs—whether in well-equipped facilities or rural field stations—can use the same detection chemistry. In my work with distributed monitoring programs, being able to supply remote stations with stable, ready-to-use substrate reduced shipping headaches and kept the quality of reporting intact across large geographic areas.
Beyond practicality, X-Gluc earns its place in published methods and national testing protocols, a testament to its sensitivity and low false positive rates. Trained analysts recognize the value of a substrate that meets benchmark standards and aligns with established regulatory frameworks. This alignment drives adoption in routine quality assurance processes for foods, beverages, and water. As research outputs become more scrutinized, methods that depend on X-Gluc stand up to peer review, regulatory audits, and cross-validation with independent laboratories. Anyone who has faced down an external audit understands the relief of pulling out results based on such a firmly established reagent.
Science rarely stands still. As detection technologies change, new pressures emerge. Microbiologists and environmental scientists now face demand for faster, multi-pathogen detection, automation, and portable devices. While traditional chromogenic substrates like X-Gluc retain central value, researchers tinker with multiplexed and sensor-based systems, hoping to shave response times or open up new application domains. The foundational chemistry of X-Gluc, founded on visible color change and robust selectivity, keeps it relevant. Through education and outreach, suppliers and scientific organizations can better connect frontline users with resources and best practices, sustaining the effective use of reliable substrates in changing laboratory environments.
Every lab operates a little differently. What works in one environment may need tweaks in another. Research groups share tips on combining X-Gluc with selective supplements, inhibitors, or pH adjustments to trim false positives and adapt assays to local sample conditions. Custom protocols publish online or circulate through professional networks. I learned early on that open dialogue with experienced colleagues at neighboring labs pays dividends, helping build a foundation for robust data and streamlined workflows. Ongoing collaboration drives continuous improvement and fosters a shared sense of ownership over outcomes, benefiting both individual projects and the broader research community.
Even the best products depend on knowledgeable operators. Training programs and hands-on workshops make a measurable difference. New technicians learn to recognize true blue colonies, handle the powder safely, and troubleshoot batch inconsistencies. Sharing annotated photos and problem logs builds community wisdom. Errors, inevitable in high-volume work, shrink in frequency as collective knowledge accumulates. Labs that routinely invest time in mentorship and documentation see smoother onboarding and lower rates of experimental rerun. In my own trajectory, every mishap with a flawed plate or weak color marked a lesson, reinforcing the value of seeking advice and recording detailed protocols.
Open science hinges on reproducible, transparent results. Using a well-defined substrate like X-Gluc means independent research teams can directly compare findings. Public databases and scientific repositories benefit from method consistency, reducing doubt over interpretation. During collaborative projects between public and private labs, the use of the same substrate minimized confusion and technical misunderstandings, speeding up joint publications and regulatory reporting. Openly available validation studies and troubleshooting guides shield new adopters from the pitfalls of trial and error, making science more accessible and trustworthy in the long term.
Behind every blue spot on an agar plate stands a team striving for clarity, safety, and progress. Tools like X-Gluc work best in the hands of those who value accuracy and accountability. The push to improve detection doesn't just rest on chemistry, but on the willingness to share insights, report setbacks, and chase better answers, day in and day out. In a fast-changing world, such diligence and collegial spirit matter as much as technical advancements. Through field work, bench science, and ongoing professional exchange, X-Gluc continues to help deliver results people can believe in. The story of this substrate echoes the broader journey of science itself—always evolving, always striving for greater clarity.