|
HS Code |
827269 |
| Iupac Name | Methyl 4-bromo-2-hydroxybenzoate |
| Molecular Formula | C8H7BrO3 |
| Molecular Weight | 231.05 g/mol |
| Cas Number | 2620-84-0 |
| Appearance | White to off-white solid |
| Melting Point | 125-128 °C |
| Solubility In Water | Slightly soluble |
| Density | 1.74 g/cm³ (approximate) |
| Smiles | COC(=O)C1=CC(=CC=C1Br)O |
| Inchi Key | VXFWOPAXHLREKB-UHFFFAOYSA-N |
| Synonyms | 4-Bromo-2-hydroxybenzoic acid methyl ester |
| Storage Temperature | Store at room temperature, tightly closed |
As an accredited Methyl 4-Bromo-2-Hydroxybenzoate factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | |
| Shipping | |
| Storage |
Competitive Methyl 4-Bromo-2-Hydroxybenzoate prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to admin@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: admin@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Walking through a research lab or sitting in a product development meeting, I always find a sort of quiet excitement whenever a reagent like Methyl 4-Bromo-2-Hydroxybenzoate comes up. This compound goes by a few names among colleagues—some call it simply a brominated methyl ester, others stick with its systematic label. No matter what you call it, I notice it shows up again and again in medicinal chemistry circles, custom synthesis projects, or material science experiments.
The model often referenced for this compound is its C8H7BrO3 structure: a familiar salicylate skeleton, methylated and brominated. For those who track their chemicals by CAS number, it’s easy to find and order. I’ve watched scientists keep this compound on a short list, comparing it to similar benzoates when mapping out synthetic plans or chasing after new analogues.
Specifications in this field get technical fast. Purity levels usually hit at least 98%, told by an HPLC printout or NMR trace. The physical form stays consistent: a light powder or sometimes fine crystals, usually white to faintly off-white. Melting points and solubility in key solvents tend to follow predictable patterns; dissolve it in common organics like dichloromethane or ethyl acetate, and you’ll see why people reach for it when standardizing protocols. The molecular weight, 231.04 g/mol, usually matters most for folks scaling up reactions or running precise stoichiometric syntheses.
What makes this compound a regular part of the toolkit comes down to its unique blend of chemical properties. Bromine sticks out, quite literally, on the aromatic ring, and that makes downstream chemistry click into place. I’ve seen brominated esters like this provide a handle for Suzuki, Heck, and Ullmann coupling reactions. The hydroxy group at the ortho position tempts you toward new ester or ether syntheses, and that opens up hundreds of synthetic routes not always possible with other benzoate esters.
Take a medicinal chemist looking at nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) cores. Swapping in a bromine atom, toggling esterification, or bringing in a phenolic hydroxy changes properties in major ways: solubility, metabolic stability, and even biological activity all shift. Real stories come from trial and error. I’ve heard postdocs tell how swapping in Methyl 4-Bromo-2-Hydroxybenzoate yielded a new intermediate no other methyl ester could deliver—a difference that meant staying late, but also a shot at novel patent filings or academic publications.
In the classroom or in the lab, comparing this methyl ester to others feels like watching the difference between a generic tool and one custom-built for a job. Salicylic acid derivatives are everywhere in organic synthesis, but throw in a bromo group at the 4-position and suddenly pathways shift. Substituted benzoates without the hydroxy group don’t always allow for regioselective transformations. Without the ester, protection and reactivity drop. Most alternatives miss at least one crucial feature for advanced functionalization.
Once in a while, people outside research ask about the real role of such chemicals. I point out that Methyl 4-Bromo-2-Hydroxybenzoate crop up in drug synthesis, fine chemical manufacture, and even fragrances, though the latter use less commonly features heavy halogenated aromatics. Where its true value shines is in providing a scaffold both reactive and stable—enough to handle heat, be stored for months, but reactive enough to branch off in many directions.
Pharmaceutical companies put a premium on building blocks that work in both old, proven routes and frontier-stage experiments. In one project I followed, a small research group used Methyl 4-Bromo-2-Hydroxybenzoate as an intermediate step to make new analogues of salicylate-based drugs with potential anti-cancer properties. The ability to efficiently substitute other groups by leveraging the bromine—using cross-coupling reactions—saved them weeks. That time advantage matters both for hitting deadlines and beating competitors to new molecules.
In the academic world, undergraduates and graduate researchers pick this compound as a case study for learning about selective substitution reactions. The ester’s stability keeps things controllable in the undergraduate teaching lab, offering a safer atmosphere than some more reactive acids or acid chlorides. The hydroxy and methyl ester groups, together with the bromine, raise intriguing questions about reactivity, mechanism, and function.
The fine chemicals sector values such intermediates for their flexibility. Synthetic pathways for dyes, light-absorbing materials, and specialty polymers routinely run through substituted benzoates. Precise structural control lets material scientists tune properties—shift the color, alter thermal response, or adjust solubility—something much harder to achieve with unsubstituted or less reactive esters.
Every chemist I know builds up experience with a handful of go-to esters and acids. On paper, the difference between Methyl 4-Bromo-2-Hydroxybenzoate and an unsubstituted methyl salicylate can look minor—draw a couple lines on a molecular structure and that's the only shift. In practice, that one extra bromine atom changes the game. The added mass and presence of a halogen raises the melting point slightly, but what really sets it apart shows up in coupling reactions and selectivity. The 4-bromo group opens doors to palladium-catalyzed processes few other methyl esters handle as elegantly.
Try running the same reaction using Methyl 2-Hydroxybenzoate or a methyl 4-chlorobenzoate; yields dip, or you fight unexpected side-products. Solubility shifts just enough to nudge reaction rates up or down. The very presence of an ortho-hydroxy group next to the ester group gives access to reactions needing an internal hydrogen bond, something not possible with para-hydroxybenzoates or simple methyl benzoate. In some fine chemical applications, trace impurities that result from less selective or older synthetic routes show up less with this brominated ester—payoff for the investment in purity.
Comparing experiences across different labs, I've seen that chemists gravitate toward this compound once they’ve been burned by the unpredictability of similar, but less versatile, benzoates. You get broader functionalization options, less byproduct headaches, and fewer repeats due to failed runs.
Research funders and regulatory agencies expect reproducibility. With Methyl 4-Bromo-2-Hydroxybenzoate, I’ve watched how quality control matters down to the decimal. If the purity falls below spec, downstream reactions falter, chromatography drags out, and cost overruns pile up. Most producers who serve advanced pharmaceutical clients now run routine NMR validation, GC/MS, and assorted impurity screens. Chemists learn, usually from experience, that untrusted sources are not worth the risk—traces of unknown halides or esters foul up multi-step syntheses far more than the upfront cost savings suggest.
Shelf-life shows up in practical lab notes: I've kept jars in climate-controlled cabinets for over a year with no visible changes, provided the packaging stays tight and dry. This level of stability gives people confidence for scale-up projects or slow-moving research campaigns. Standard containers, marked and sealed by weight, encourage careful documentation in laboratory records, further promoting consistency.
Years back, researchers rolled the dice more often, working with intermediates of unknown or mixed composition. Today, journal editors and funding agencies demand not just completed work, but proof the building blocks were well characterized. Methyl 4-Bromo-2-Hydroxybenzoate fits into this “show your work” culture perfectly, thanks to its ready documentation and well-known analytical profile.
No conversation about specialty chemicals is complete without mentioning safe handling. Even compounds with long track records deserve respect—brominated chemicals raise eyebrows for good reason. Although I’ve never run into acute toxicity cases during my bench work, care takes the form of gloves, well-ventilated spaces, and rigorous labeling. The hydroxybenzoate backbone is less volatile than some, making accidental inhalation rare, but the bromine brings halide-specific disposal concerns.
Researchers new to organic synthesis sometimes underestimate the risks. Years of watching colleagues handle spills or mislabel containers drilled home just how important routine checks and staff training become. Chemical hygiene plans at reputable institutions list steps for neutralizing, containing, and disposing of brominated organics—and these steps get followed. Personal experience says it’s worth double-checking storage locations and not relying on memory for dangerous reagents.
With rising awareness around environmental sustainability, I now see questions on waste minimization and green chemistry in every serious R&D planning session. Some firms opt for alternatives to halogenated intermediates when possible—but in cases where reactivity or selectivity can’t be matched, safe use and responsible waste processing win the day.
Keeping up with market trends and evolving regulation feels like a second job. Agencies in North America, Europe, and Asia routinely revise permissible use and transportation guidelines for substances like this one. Instances where chemical suppliers lost market access over lapses in labeling or impurity management show that trust and compliance are more valuable now than ever.
In pharmaceutical and biotech research, materials that fail to meet documentation standards create headaches, delays, and, in some cases, lost opportunity. The consistent analytical data available for Methyl 4-Bromo-2-Hydroxybenzoate presents a model for how specialty chemicals can align with strict regulatory frameworks and maintain reliable supply chains.
I’ve noticed a change in attitude even among seasoned scientists: there’s less tolerance for sourcing “off-brand” chemical intermediates—better the small cost upfront than the project risk later. Feedback loops between chemists, suppliers, and end users now drive improvements in packaging, tracking, and certification. Ultimately, the process of moving from research grade to manufacturing scale depends not just on chemistry, but on a web of relationships and mutual standards.
Products like Methyl 4-Bromo-2-Hydroxybenzoate might not grab headlines, but their value shows through the ripple effects in drug discovery, advanced materials, and process chemistry. The ability to rapidly build and test new molecules—even in academic or startup environments—relies on predictable access to these intermediates.
One story stands out: a friend at a university in Europe chased a new class of bioactive molecules aimed at rare neurological disorders. Only by switching their synthetic anchor to this brominated hydroxybenzoate did they escape a series of failed coupling reactions. The time that would have gone to troubleshooting could go, instead, to animal studies and, later, clinical proposals. Innovations happen on this sort of day-to-day foundation—reliable intermediates making exploration possible.
Failure drives adaptation. More than once, I’ve started to set up a reaction with a familiar methyl ester, hit a wall, and had to rethink, turning back to the stockroom for this alternative. The slight price premium generally fades next to the gain in robustness and downstream opportunities.
Some bottlenecks never really change. At many institutions, the main problem is reliably sourcing material at the right time, and in the right quality. Unforeseen disruptions—shipping issues, regulatory delays, or market price spikes—throw off budget calculations and experimental plans. Over the years, the solution has settled around building trusted supplier relationships, staying updated on regulatory changes, and, where possible, keeping modest inventory buffers for key intermediates.
Another issue turns up in scale-up operations. What runs smoothly at the 100-mg or 1-gram scale may hit walls at a kilogram. Heat management, mixing, and impurity profiles shift. For this reason, process chemists—myself included—keep detailed notes on solvent swaps and concentration tweaks. Modifying approaches for extraction and purification, especially if downstream products serve regulated markets, keeps projects from stalling at critical milestones.
Training and institutional memory also matter. Too often, informal know-how gets lost in personnel turnover. Successful teams address this by building rigorous handover processes and documenting not just procedures but decision points—why one intermediate works better than another, which reactions failed and why, and lessons learned on safe handling. Peer learning through internal seminars helps smooth transitions and spread hard-won expertise.
In the end, the quiet backbone of progress in fields from pharmaceuticals to materials science lies with specialty chemicals like Methyl 4-Bromo-2-Hydroxybenzoate. It doesn’t spark the sort of attention that new AI tools or finished drugs might, but without dependable, well-characterized intermediates, the biggest scientific ambitions go nowhere. My own work, and that of colleagues in labs and production facilities worldwide, moves forward on the predictability and adaptability of such building blocks.
Whether chasing better therapies, designing new molecular sensors, or simply teaching the next wave of students, products like this serve as a bridge between chemical theory and practical reality. The best advances rarely come from a single breakthrough; they stem from years of incremental progress, methodical adaptation, and trusted materials. Every improvement—faster reactions, cleaner yields, simpler purification—ripples out to support wider goals in science, medicine, and industry.