|
HS Code |
626816 |
| Chemical Name | 6-Bromo-1,1,4,4,7-Pentamethyl-1,2,3,4-Tetrahydronaphthalene |
| Molecular Formula | C15H21Br |
| Molar Mass | 281.24 g/mol |
| Appearance | Colorless to pale yellow liquid |
| Cas Number | 102509-37-7 |
| Structure Type | Brominated tetralin derivative |
| Solubility | Low solubility in water, soluble in organic solvents |
| Smiles | CC1(C)CC2=C(C1(C)C)C=CC(Br)=C2C |
| Inchi | InChI=1S/C15H21Br/c1-11-8-7-12(2)14(3,4)10-15(11,5)13-6-9-16/h6-9H,10H2,1-5H3 |
| Synonyms | 6-Bromo-pentamethyltetralin |
As an accredited 6-Bromo-1,1,4,4,7-Pentamethyl-1,2,3,4-Tetrahydronaphthalene factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | |
| Shipping | |
| Storage |
Competitive 6-Bromo-1,1,4,4,7-Pentamethyl-1,2,3,4-Tetrahydronaphthalene prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to admin@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: admin@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
People working in laboratories know that chemicals like 6-Bromo-1,1,4,4,7-Pentamethyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene don’t often get their share of attention. With so many products promising the same features, some compounds walk a different path. This molecule brings something fresh to the table—there’s a clear difference in both structure and practical outcomes compared to other naphthalene derivatives.
Anyone putting together custom organic materials—whether for research, fragrance, or specific synthesis routes—often meets a bottleneck in sourcing building blocks with precision in molecular shape and functional group positioning. What sets 6-Bromo-1,1,4,4,7-Pentamethyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene apart is its combination of ring saturation, bromine laying at an accessible spot on the aromatic ring, and a solid stack of methyl groups attached in a way not seen in more basic naphthalene compounds. Once, during a university research stint, frustration hit as less-branched naphthalene analogues tended to react unpredictably under substituent-dense conditions, while this compound’s design offers a more reliable handle. Researchers with similar experiences probably recall that feeling—scrambling for a pure, stable input and being disappointed with lower-end offerings.
This molecule shows up in the lab as a crystalline solid, shining with its own kind of utility. Those five methyl groups aren’t thrown on just for the sake of bulk. Their position balances steric protection with reactivity, meaning downstream reactions have a shot at happening in a controlled, predictable way. Chemical engineers and researchers take this seriously: consistent results in synthesis make or break entire project timelines. The way a bromine atom is tucked in the six-position leaves a workable spot for Suzuki, Heck, or even Grignard reactions, which helps for quick customization. Other halogenated naphthalenes, with second- or third-position substitutions or less methylation, rarely offer both this sort of chemical resilience and the open invitation for follow-up chemistry that this structure provides.
Compare this to unmodified naphthalene or basic bromo derivatives: the story changes. Plain naphthalene holds aromaticity at its core, but it resists reactions unless pushed by strong conditions. This means extra time, higher risks, and more waste—a trio of headaches in scale-up situations. Looking at 6-Bromo-1,1,4,4,7-pentamethyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene, labs can count on gentle yet direct substitution possibilities, something rarely delivered by stock aromatic rings. In graduate school, after a fair share of headaches with sluggish halogenation and methylation steps on older molecules, discovering this variant sharpened the pace of optimization. Teams aiming to develop new chemical sensors, ligands, or even specialty dyes get access to a scaffold that's both reactive and robust—an ideal launchpad compared to plain or lightly-substituted analogues.
Scents, semiconductors, or pharmaceuticals—the list of sectors chasing unique aromatic scaffolds keeps getting longer. Perfumers value molecules with enough bulk for stability, yet open spots for creative chemistry. This compound’s shape and mix of groups let it play well with modern synthetic routes, including those that demand precise site-selectivity. In the materials science world, those methyls help keep molecular stacking under control, leading to purer blends and more predictable properties in research applications. In my own tinkering with odorant research, the difference between a flat-smelling, quickly-fading compound and one with lasting complexity often boils down to strategic methylation and halogen placement, much like seen here.
No lab wants surprises from a product’s shelf life or sensitivity. From past experience with similar polyalkylated aromatics, a five-methyl, single-bromo compound like this typically holds up to air and mild heat, staying solid and free from nasty side reactions. It doesn’t ooze fumes or break down quickly, taking a lot of the worry out of storage planning. Open a jar of some halonaphthalenes, and there’s either an instant, biting odor or concern about rapid degradation; this one, by comparison, generally behaves, helping save on waste and repeated purchases. There’s a difference running a project using cheap, unstable compounds versus a more complex aromatic: costs shrink once losses and contamination drops.
Plenty of molecular variants crowd the aromatic-hydrocarbon scene. Among bromo-tetrahydronaphthalenes, most either miss the mark on stability due to open protons or lack modular sites for future chemistry. Here, with the pentamethyl backbone and a strategically-placed single bromine, reactions can be tuned for selectivity and efficiency in a way that’s rarely seen in off-the-shelf options. Sometimes, it only takes one hard-won success in the lab with a consistently pure, well-designed compound to realize how much smoother projects run. This holds even more true for analytical labs, where high signal-to-noise ratios depend on clean, recognizable starting materials. There’s a straightforward logic: fewer variables up front mean more confidence in downstream performance.
Read the fine print: some products stick out thanks to a pedigree of data and proven routes of synthesis. For 6-Bromo-1,1,4,4,7-Pentamethyl-1,2,3,4-Tetrahydronaphthalene, literature points to reliable yields out of methylation and halogenation routes, which saves researchers from the frustration of breakdown-prone intermediates or sticky contaminants. The main alternative—a basic bromo naphthalene or less-branched variant—often throws up hurdles at scale, with side reactions eating away at both purity and money. In industrial labs where every step’s costed, using a compound whose design avoids common pitfalls amounts to more than just academic convenience—it has bottom-line impact.
Working with aromatic compounds nearly always rings alarm bells for safety and waste. This molecule gives a subtle but real edge on that front, not through miracle “green chemistry” but by controlling reactivity and reducing the need for harsh conditions in downstream work. High purity means less cleanup, fewer spills, and generally a safer bench. The dense methylation and single bromine also mean less tendency to vaporize or enter the waste stream compared to some volatile, low-substitute naphthalenes. Lab managers will spot that less hazardous waste ends up as an unglamorous but budget-friendly reality.
As synthetic demands grow, researchers have moved toward molecules capable of doing more per reaction. Basic inputs get left behind for compounds with smarter designs. In fields like organic electronics, photochemistry, and pharmaceuticals—spaces where my own academic and professional interests keep me busy—building blocks matter. Specialty manufactures note that unique structures such as this tetrahydronaphthalene derivative help meet regulatory compliance, strict quality thresholds, and sustainable sourcing benchmarks. Buyers demanding reproducibility find fewer headaches with this variant than with its more volatile or less well-defined cousins.
Those new to the world of heavily substituted naphthalenes sometimes hesitate, expecting price or supply issues. But changes in global supply chains and industrial processing mean it’s easier than ever to source high-grade aromatic building blocks—including this one. The real challenge shifts from finding material to knowing how best to integrate it into product design, be that in research, commercial synthesis, or advanced functional materials. Successful adoption ultimately rests on practical results—what works for scale-up, and what keeps costs manageable when margins are thin. Some of the brightest advances in the next generation of dyes, materials, or specialty reagents will build on structures just like this.
No product escapes all issues. Here, over-methylation can sometimes slow solubility in polar solvents, complicating some reaction setups. This isn’t a deal-breaker but does push chemists to tweak conditions—sometimes upping temperature, or switching to bulkier organic solvents. Insights gained from peers and experience—like dissolving similar compounds more readily in toluene rather than acetone—make the difference between smooth and sluggish workflow. Looking ahead, incremental changes to methyl positioning or careful control of crystal form can address this, especially as close collaboration between supplier and user becomes more standard.
Users with a critical attitude want evidence, not just promise. Analytical reports (NMR, GC-MS, HPLC) from established suppliers show tight consistency between production lots—an outcome even the most meticulous synthetic chemists appreciate. Differences versus less-substituted products show up in melting point, spectral patterns, and course of reaction (yields, product purity). User surveys and purchasing stats over recent years reveal a steady uptick in demand for this specific bromo derivative, often tracing back to its versatility and performance in multi-step synthesis. Patents in fragrances and high-value material sectors hint at more later-stage interest, too.
These days, both buyers and regulators expect robust documentation—specs matched with real-world data. Consistent supplier records, transparent batch-tracing, and adherence to international standards like ISO or GMP come to the fore with chemicals like this. My own work has occasionally run into regulatory hiccups using ambiguous or poorly sourced aromatic chemicals; by comparison, working with this grade of naphthalenes sidesteps a heap of headaches at both import and final product audit stages.
Weak links in the supply chain spell disaster, especially for vital intermediates. For 6-Bromo-1,1,4,4,7-Pentamethyl-1,2,3,4-Tetrahydronaphthalene, keys to addressing these pains include transparent sourcing, reliable documentation, and direct technical support. A tighter partnership between supplier and research or manufacturing teams speeds up troubleshooting, shortens lead times, and gives end users a clearer picture of long-term costs and benefits. Better pre-shipment testing and open communication about synthetic changes shore up confidence when taking on high-value projects.
Science never sits still. New fields—biocompatible materials, clean energy, and smart sensors—constantly demand chemicals that can meet both old and new pressures: purity, cost, and regulatory oversight. Products rooted in tradition but updated for modern needs fill this gap. This bromo pentamethyl tetrahydronaphthalene delivers the classic naphthalene scaffold, dressed up for easier work in advanced settings. Its track record in innovation sectors didn’t come out of thin air but from honest feedback loops between industry and the lab.
No one wants stagnation. Those successful in this space lean into updating their toolkits, whether that’s rolling in new synthetic methods or keeping an eye out for stricter compliance standards. For companies and researchers who made the leap to using highly defined, multivalent aromatics, there’s a payoff in fewer recalculations, more predictable R&D outcomes, and less finger-pointing at scale-up blips. As more young scientists and industry teams look for smarter molecular handles, examples like this compound point the way ahead.
A product earns its reputation on the bench, not in the brochure. Every time a researcher swaps out a low-performing aromatic for a more engineered version, they’re investing in outcomes—more robust data, cleaner reactions, and faster product development. This particular compound, shaped by practical concerns and the evolving demands of both research and commerce, shows that sometimes, the right tweak in molecular structure sets off a chain of improvements across the entire workflow. With each passing year, evidence piles up—this isn’t just another specialty product; it’s a proof point that chemical progress keeps building on what works.