|
HS Code |
351937 |
| Product Name | 5-[3-Bromo-4-(Dimethylamino)Phenyl]-2,3,5,6-Tetrahydro-2,2-Dimethylbenzo[A]Phenanthridine-4(1H)-One |
| Molecular Formula | C25H25BrN2O |
| Cas Number | NA |
| Appearance | Solid |
| Purity | Typically ≥98% |
| Solubility | DMSO, DMF, limited in water |
| Storage Conditions | Store at 2-8°C, protected from light and moisture |
| Synonyms | No widely used synonyms available |
| Smiles | CC1(CC2=C(C3=CC=CC=C3C4=C2C(=O)N(C4)C)C5=CC(=C(C=C5)Br)N(C)C)C1 |
| Inchi | InChI=1S/C25H25BrN2O/c1-25(2)15-18-16-7-5-6-14-9-10-17(11-12-19(14)18)22(24(25)20(16)21(15)29)13-8-23(26)27(3)4/h5-13H,15H2,1-4H3,(H,29,30) |
As an accredited 5-[3-Bromo-4-(Dimethylamino)Phenyl]-2,3,5,6-Tetrahydro-2,2-Dimethylbenzo[A]Phenanthridine-4(1H)-One factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | |
| Shipping | |
| Storage |
Competitive 5-[3-Bromo-4-(Dimethylamino)Phenyl]-2,3,5,6-Tetrahydro-2,2-Dimethylbenzo[A]Phenanthridine-4(1H)-One prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to admin@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: admin@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Every so often, a compound shows up and quietly shifts the conversation among researchers and industry folks. 5-[3-Bromo-4-(Dimethylamino)Phenyl]-2,3,5,6-Tetrahydro-2,2-Dimethylbenzo[A]Phenanthridine-4(1H)-One doesn’t exactly roll off the tongue, but it captures attention for all the right reasons. This molecule isn’t sitting in chemistry textbooks as a trivia piece. Instead, it offers a kind of flexibility and intrigue anyone working with phenanthridine-based frameworks can appreciate.
Most people don’t walk into a lab hoping to wrestle with heavy brominated aromatics, but some jobs call for nothing less. This compound stands out with its thoughtful arrangement: bromine at just the right spot for selective reactivity, a dimethylamino group that tells a story about its electronic leanings, and a benzo[a]phenanthridine core that holds its own against structural fatigue and weathering. This means chemists can try modifications in ways that save hours and headaches. I remember running late-stage functionalizations on similar scaffolds and hitting roadblocks that only resolved after bringing in the right electronic tweaks. Having those electron-rich and electron-poor regions makes a real difference during synthesis, especially when pushing reactions like palladium catalyzed cross-couplings or radical reactions.
Step into any synthesis lab battling complex targets, and you’ll find the biggest pain points aren’t always raw reactivity or theoretical yield—they’re usually unpredictability and wasted time. A structure like this isn’t just a chemical curiosity. It brings in real-world flexibility, working both as an advanced intermediate and as an endpoint for studies. Not every molecule in this class can dance between analog development and mechanistic studies, but the balance in its design suggests that it can handle high-throughput screening without falling partway through a column or decomposing when hit with basic workups.
Academic groups working in medicinal chemistry or molecular imaging often find themselves handcuffed by over-engineered targets or finicky functional groups. 5-[3-Bromo-4-(Dimethylamino)Phenyl]-2,3,5,6-Tetrahydro-2,2-Dimethylbenzo[A]Phenanthridine-4(1H)-One makes a solid pitch for those who want to bridge discovery and application. You get a scaffold robust enough for biological assays, yet sensitive enough for quick derivatization. If I think back to my time testing heterocyclic libraries against kinase targets, the structural stability of the core would let me push conditions without worrying about cracking open the aromatic system or cleaving off side groups at the wrong stage.
In some circles, this compound piques interest as a starting point for anticancer or antiviral candidates. Combine the bromine’s bulk with the electron-donating punch of the dimethylamino group, and you open doors to targets that respond to both steric and electronic modulation. Colleagues of mine said their group found phenanthridine derivatives rich ground for developing inhibitors, especially where DNA intercalation or kinase binding mattered. Real progress—actual candidate optimization—happens when you can add or swap substituents without watching the molecule disintegrate. That’s what sets this structure apart: it stands up to tough conditions and keeps its core intact.
Blending a tetrahydro component with a dimethylbenzo[a]phenanthridine system means more than just adding stability. The saturated rings bring new three-dimensionality to what is often a flat world of aromatic compounds. I’ve spent hours watching colleagues struggle with planar molecules that just wouldn’t fit into protein pockets or produced poor drug-like properties. Adding non-planarity opens up access to targets that care about shape and not just electronics. It’s a feature often overlooked until you hit that late-stage optimization crunch when flat molecules don’t cut it anymore.
It's easy to find brominated aromatics or tertiary amine derivatives, but this specific combination is rare. Many compounds might share one or two features, yet overlook how those traits interact under realistic lab or industry settings. Here, the bromine serves as a synthetic handle for further functionalization—Suzuki, Buchwald-Hartwig, and more come to mind—while the dimethylamino group offers solubility and the chance for further alteration. That dual flexibility can make or break a series when timelines shrink and the pressure is on to deliver results.
Scanning the catalogs, you’ll see piles of heterocyclic molecules, plenty with modifications at different points along the aromatic core. But most of those don’t offer the right mix of reactivity and backbone toughness. Go too far on the electronic push or pull, and you wind up with a finicky, air-sensitive mess. Skimp on rigidity and you find yourself with molecules that flop or rot away during storage. The 5-[3-Bromo-4-(Dimethylamino)Phenyl] variety walks this tightrope better than most, letting researchers run reactions under less controlled circumstances without sacrificing structural integrity.
Many related products either lack the same solubility window or don’t play well with multiple downstream transformation steps. I’ve seen efforts in academic and pharma settings stall when building blocks react cleanly one day, then produce unworkable sludges after scale-up or solvent changes. Having a molecule that stays consistent from five milligrams up to multi-gram runs isn’t trivial. It takes careful engineering of the core—and the addition of two methyl groups on the benzo[a]phenanthridine really does help stabilize the transition from bench to pilot plant.
Start talking about practical applications, and you’ll notice that a lot of off-the-shelf molecules look good until you put them to work. Here’s where hands-on experience weighs in. Many formulations or active intermediates claim broad applicability but demand idealized conditions that rarely show up outside top-tier facilities. The 5-[3-Bromo-4-(Dimethylamino)Phenyl] molecule bucks that trend. It adapts—whether you’re tossing it into exploratory library synthesis, chemical biology, or advanced materials screening.
Even experienced researchers underestimate the strain small differences in raw material quality can put on larger production cycles. One batch of a different phenanthridine derivative might grill you with invisible impurities that poison a late-stage reaction. This molecular design, though, brings enough robustness to reduce those headaches. You don’t have to watch every little environmental factor or tweak process steps endlessly. Production teams get breathing room on the trickiest steps, freeing up time and budget for the breakthroughs that really move a project forward.
One of the points I keep hearing in the industry and in research circles is the expectation of responsible sourcing and a straightforward approach to safety. The presence of a brominated aromatic core demands careful handling, sure—but it’s also well-documented and manageable with standard lab protocols. For groups worried about scale or compliance, this can be the difference between greenlighting a project and shelving it over regulatory hurdles. Back in my days coordinating with purchasing, I learned that the ability to secure reliable documentation and traceability often came less from company reputation and more from the molecule itself. Stable, well-characterized intermediates matter—especially as global scrutiny on chemical manufacturing climbs.
Handling aromatic bromides taught me the importance of good air flow and careful waste management. This compound isn’t an exception, but it isn’t a new can of worms, either. It fits into established chemical stewardship practices, so teams don’t have to reinvent the wheel just to use a tool that can yield novel discoveries.
The world of molecular design keeps moving faster, and many breakthroughs now depend on open collaboration—across academic, industrial, and regulatory boundaries. A molecule packed with functionalities lets teams in different disciplines chase parallel lines of inquiry, instead of fencing off work based on compatibility or synthetic ease. I’ve seen project timelines collapse when a crucial building block forced one partner onto the sidelines. This compound sidesteps a lot of those issues and encourages researchers to keep projects flowing across teams and borders.
Think of the potential in medicinal chemistry and drug discovery. The overlap between structure-activity relationship studies, toxicity screening, and formulation dev work grows thinner every year. A compound stable under several environmental and experimental pressures means groups can share materials from the same batch and trust their results. That’s a game-changer for anyone betting on reproducibility and transparency.
With the chemical landscape evolving at breakneck speed, chemists face the pressure of not just making molecules, but making them smart—tailored for tomorrow’s problems. It’s easy to overlook seemingly small details until you realize those details drive the difference between another publication and genuine impact. 5-[3-Bromo-4-(Dimethylamino)Phenyl]-2,3,5,6-Tetrahydro-2,2-Dimethylbenzo[A]Phenanthridine-4(1H)-One doesn’t just offer a new entry in chemical catalogs. It powers a different attitude toward modular design and practical adaptation.
The days of “one-size-fits-all” chemicals are over. Research tools need to serve new platforms—from automated reaction design to AI-driven screening. In personal experience working alongside data science teams, reproducible reagents made model building and data integration feasible. Nobody wants to lose months to ambiguous or temperamental compounds and patchwork documentation. Tracking down errors in computation can sometimes come back to unpredictable physical properties from the start. Building reliability into the molecular core heads off those problems before they ever appear.
Making something this complex at a practical scale tests even seasoned synthetic chemists. Run enough late-stage runs and you’ll learn that lab tricks don’t always scale. Some molecules lose yield, others pick up stubborn byproducts, still others stall out in workups that once looked trivial. The compound here holds up thanks to careful design. Those two methyl groups on the benzo[a]phenanthridine backbone aren’t just decorative—they add real-world toughness, fighting off unwanted oxidation and minimizing over-reaction during scale-up steps.
What this means for industry partners or academic labs handling dozens of runs every week: fewer starts and stops, and a smoother transition from idea to implementation. Anyone familiar with the churn of production will see value in a molecule that helps cut through the guesswork and gets you closer to repeatable processes. That’s something chemists at the bench and in the boardroom can agree on.
Let’s face it, the field isn’t just chasing the next paper or incremental advance. Research teams want multifunctional reagents—compounds that adapt to changing needs and unexpected project turns. If one route closes because of biological hurdles, properties like bromine placement or tertiary amine functionality let you reroute after only minor changes. That adaptability keeps research projects from stalling out or sinking too much time on dead ends.
Many hailed the arrival of universal building blocks and combinatorial chemistry for democratizing innovation, but as someone who’s watched the tides change, the trick is getting the details right. Not all “modular” systems deliver. Sometimes, minor differences in geometry or solubility quietly torpedo entire lines of investigation. In this case, the combination of electronic effects and steric accessibility sets the compound up as more than just another intermediate—it becomes a springboard for fresh directions. I watched one team adapt a similar structure, spinning off syntheses for targeted library prep and photophysical testing that fed multiple areas without rewriting every protocol.
Academia and industry are both learning that long-term success isn’t just about flashy discovery. Sustained progress depends on keeping options open, especially where regulatory direction or societal priorities push research down new channels. Every toolbox needs options that work under shifting rules and expectations. This compound brings that, letting innovators steer through changing landscapes with tools that won’t buckle under pressure.
No compound solves every problem, but certain frameworks help crack persistent challenges that slow innovation. The 5-[3-Bromo-4-(Dimethylamino)Phenyl]-2,3,5,6-Tetrahydro-2,2-Dimethylbenzo[A]Phenanthridine-4(1H)-One design supports efforts ranging from small-scale discovery experiments to high-throughput screening, all the way up to semi-industrial production. The shift from academic theory to working product doesn’t have to fray nerves or budgets any more than necessary. Experienced researchers appreciate the freedom that comes from building on scaffolds tough enough to survive ambitious campaigns.
The world’s problems grow more interconnected and more pressing. Teams tackling big issues, whether in public health, environmental chemistry, or materials development, need molecules that keep pace. I’ve seen how accessible, reliable intermediates streamline communication and speed up troubleshooting, whether folks are talking across disciplines or continents. This compound fits the growing need for common ground—units shared by chemists, engineers, and analysts without friction over performance or ambiguity.
Looking back, I can see how earlier generations of similar molecules paved the way for everything from improved diagnostics to better catalysts. Modern chemical innovation now demands even more from every reagent. Speed, accuracy, resilience—rarely do you find them rolled into one. This molecule gets closer than most.
A lot of synthetic targets end up as footnotes. They flash briefly in journals, only to be left behind by the next tech wave. 5-[3-Bromo-4-(Dimethylamino)Phenyl]-2,3,5,6-Tetrahydro-2,2-Dimethylbenzo[A]Phenanthridine-4(1H)-One has a shot at lasting value. Its balance between adaptability and toughness, electronic nuance and steric depth, make it more than a half-remembered entry in a catalog.
Researchers and industry teams looking for long-term, constructive solutions will see the benefit in tools designed for more than just a good-looking NMR spectrum. They’ll see it in saved time, credible data, and doors swung wide for cross-disciplinary work. Innovation depends on a bedrock of small steps and dependable intermediates. While trends shift and the pace of research only gets quicker, a molecule like this plants the flag for smarter, more conscious synthetic planning.