|
HS Code |
308699 |
| Product Name | 4-(2-Bromoethyl)Piperazine-1-Carboxylic Acid Tert-Butyl Ester |
| Molecular Formula | C11H21BrN2O2 |
| Molecular Weight | 293.21 g/mol |
| Cas Number | 141699-24-1 |
| Appearance | Colorless to pale yellow liquid |
| Purity | Typically >98% |
| Solubility | Soluble in common organic solvents (e.g., DCM, methanol) |
| Storage Conditions | Store at 2-8°C, protect from light and moisture |
| Smiles | CC(C)(C)OC(=O)N1CCN(CCBr)CC1 |
As an accredited 4-(2-Bromoethyl)Piperazine-1-Carboxylic Acid Tert-Butyl Ester factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | |
| Shipping | |
| Storage |
Competitive 4-(2-Bromoethyl)Piperazine-1-Carboxylic Acid Tert-Butyl Ester prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to admin@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: admin@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Chemists rarely get excited about routine building blocks, but every once in a while, a compound shows up that draws attention for something more than reliability—it’s the way it nudges boundaries. 4-(2-Bromoethyl)Piperazine-1-Carboxylic Acid Tert-Butyl Ester offers more than a long, unwieldy name. This molecule stands at a key intersection in modern organic synthesis, especially for those dedicated to pushing forward research in medicinal chemistry and complex heterocyclic design. Anyone spending hours in a laboratory, trying to bridge the gap between bench chemistry and scalable drug leads, knows the importance of the right intermediate. Years ago, I learned firsthand the headaches caused by poor solubility, by inconsistent reactivity, by intermediates that seemed more like obstacles than stepping stones. This compound solves old problems and opens up new pathways in ways you can appreciate across multiple projects.
Known among chemists for its distinct bromoethyl group attached to a protected piperazine ring, the tert-butyl ester function brings compatibility, shielding carboxyl groups during multi-step synthesis. This matters most not just for its own sake, but for labs facing complex, sensitive targets—especially those that require iterative modification or late-stage diversification. Many building blocks offer bromoethyl groups or piperazine rings, but this compound pairs them in a way that accelerates coupling reactions without the persistent instability or stubborn reactivity seen in some brominated analogs. I still remember dealing with a batch of piperazine derivatives that decomposed faster than I could run TLC, halting big projects mid-stream. With this molecule, you get a shelf-stable white to off-white solid, which stores easily under standard lab conditions and delivers reliable purity—usually upwards of 97% as confirmed by NMR and HPLC.
A lot of intermediates market themselves as versatile, but versatility only goes so far if you’re wrestling with poor yields or tedious purification. What sets 4-(2-Bromoethyl)Piperazine-1-Carboxylic Acid Tert-Butyl Ester apart is how cleanly it reacts in common cross-coupling and alkylation steps. This isn’t speculation: publications over the last five years documented smoother incorporation into small molecule drugs and peptidomimetics. More than just a donor of bromoethyl units, it takes center stage in making piperazine-based motifs practical to access. Instead of the side-product headaches I once faced with less stable analogs, this one consistently gives you better control, particularly once you start scaling past gram quantities.
In the context of medicinal chemistry, the piperazine ring is already a well-loved scaffold—used as a backbone in antihistamines, antipsychotics, and experimental cancer therapies. Adding a bromoethyl arm opens wider doors for functionalization, whether you’re attaching fluorescent tags or building intricate side chains for SAR (structure-activity relationship) studies. The protected tert-butyl ester means you aren’t watching your carboxylic acid play havoc with your reagents or prematurely saponifying in basic conditions. I’ve watched colleagues drop other intermediates from entire synthetic plans due to persistent hydrolysis—this one stands up to the punishment of harsh conditions, and you get to reveal the carboxylic acid only when the route calls for it.
During one stretch in graduate school, my group ran three separate analog syntheses with unprotected bromoethyl piperazine molecules. Each time, extra steps crept in—byproducts ate away at yields, and we lost time with column chromatography that just felt endless. That inefficiency wasn’t about the chemistry being wrong but about the molecules not matching the ambitious methodology we had mapped out. Moving to the tert-butyl ester version made a difference from the first week: separations got cleaner, reactions clicked where they hadn’t before, and we could push further into late-stage modifications without doubling back or reworking plans. Many piperazine products skip over the importance of the protected ester, but anyone synthesizing active pharmaceutical ingredients knows the pain of retracing steps due to early deprotection.
In most cases, unprotected carboxylic acids cloud the next stage with compatibility questions—solubility in DCM, reactivity with organometallic reagents, stability in the face of strong base. The tert-butyl ester handles these challenges head-on. It isn’t a one-trick pony, either—the molecule resists humidity, travels safely in standard laboratory shipments, and dissolves with consistency in DCM, DMF, and acetonitrile. Every lab bench has its own horror stories about compounds that refuse to dissolve or degrade on arrival, and switching to this tert-butyl ester often means fewer phone calls to suppliers and less wasted time remaking batches.
Chemists looking to stitch together large molecular architectures find this building block invaluable in both microwave-assisted and traditional heating protocols. Laboratories seeking to explore piperazine-based linkers in bioconjugation or signal transduction pathways rely on the predictability this ester offers. There’s a comfort in knowing that, after sometimes arduous route planning, you won’t lose valuable intermediates to decomposition during workup. Project leaders I’ve worked with often cite time lost troubleshooting reagent compatibility. The tert-butyl ester protects time just as much as it protects the carboxylic function.
Another practical edge comes in solid-phase synthesis. During the wave of interest around peptides mimicking protein surfaces, many groups moved toward piperazine spacers to impart flexibility, bioavailability, and resistance to enzymatic breakdown. During Fmoc chemistry or parallel syntheses, uncontrolled side reactions can compromise whole libraries of compounds. Using this intermediate, labs build up solid supports, cleave the protecting group on their own schedule, and move forward with confidence that no unexpected reactive hotspots will pop up at inconvenient junctures.
The pharmaceutical landscape doesn’t reward delay, and the route to a viable lead compound rarely follows a straight line. Reliable intermediates bridge early design to pilot-scale testing. Regulatory compliance hangs on purity, documentation, and reproducibility—qualities researchers want in every gram, not just specialized batches. 4-(2-Bromoethyl)Piperazine-1-Carboxylic Acid Tert-Butyl Ester fits this need because it behaves consistently at varying scales. You can move from milligrams in discovery labs to hundreds of grams needed for animal models without switching suppliers or re-optimizing protocols. From my personal bench work, a well-protected intermediate like this minimizes documentation headaches and keeps process chemists one step closer to GMP compliance down the line.
It's also worth mentioning environmental impact. As green chemistry principles take hold, labs everywhere scrutinize atom economy, waste, and the hazards produced along the route to molecules with therapeutic promise. Poorly protected intermediates often mean extra purification steps, higher solvent use, and greater energy costs. This molecule’s resilient tert-butyl group enables higher-yield reactions, and the cleaner workup means fewer extractions, less chromatography, and easier solvent recycling. Sustainable practices begin with smarter molecule choice, so adopting compounds like this one leaves a lighter footprint while streamlining workflow.
No intermediate works as a magic bullet for every scenario. Some projects involve particularly sensitive partners, and there are always idiosyncrasies—occasional batch-to-batch variation, or the rare appearance of trace impurities that sneak through synthesis. The solution isn’t to shy away, but rather to establish robust quality control, with strong analytical checks. For this compound, most reputable suppliers back their product with detailed NMR, HPLC, and (where relevant) chiral purity documentation. Internal QC routines—regular TLC spot checks, melting point comparisons, endpoint analysis—add greater certainty before major synthetic campaigns get underway. Teams who set up these double-checks catch problems early and avoid trouble further down the road.
Storage might sound mundane, but it saves research time and budget. Keeping this compound tightly sealed, stored away from strong acids or bases, and out of direct sunlight preserves it for extended periods. Even in older fridges, I’ve seen this ester maintain expected performance over a year with minimal loss in reactivity or purity. In contrast, less stable analogs require constant resynthesis or purchase—draining both morale and funds. Planning for longevity up front pays dividends in project momentum.
It’s easy to write off subtle differences between protected and unprotected analogs, but hands-on experience reveals their full impact. In the middle of multi-week campaigns, one can tell if a molecule truly earns its keep on the bench. For years, iterative optimization cycles would stall on unpredictable intermediates, with teams pulled off core problems by routine troubleshooting. Once my team replaced a troublemaking unprotected acid with the tert-butyl ester, we hit fewer reruns and shaved weeks off the process. Gradually, that reliability not only helped us finish a campaign on time but allowed us to plan new studies with confidence.
This level of dependability extends beyond medicinal chemistry. Peptidomimetic cyclizations, heterocycle expansion, and even advanced material science projects have all benefited from an intermediate that takes variable routes in stride. I remember conversations across disciplines—biophysicists, computational chemists, process engineers—converging on pragmatic questions about molecules like this. Those workarounds that once seemed routine become unnecessary when an intermediate simply behaves as the literature and suppliers claim.
Every lab balances ambition with the nuts and bolts of execution. Equipment, time, people, and, above all, reagents shape what actually gets done. As projects move from ideas sketched in meetings to reality on the bench, intermediate choice speaks for or against a day’s progress. 4-(2-Bromoethyl)Piperazine-1-Carboxylic Acid Tert-Butyl Ester offers more than a fixed chemical structure—it stands as an example of what the right intermediate can do for pace, scope, and confidence across fields.
It’s because of that reliability that research teams around the world keep it stocked. In the past, I lost count of conversations that began with colleagues saying, “If only this compound worked out, we could have scaled faster.” There’s something reassuring about opening a vial and knowing the next stage will go as planned—not because a catalog description promises it but because bench experience proves it time and again.
Progress in chemistry isn’t a solo endeavor. Labs, industry partners, and educators all strengthen one another through open dialogue. As more researchers publish and compare synthetic methodologies, intermediates that consistently meet high standards rise to the top. This tert-butyl ester now features in peer-reviewed syntheses, drug discovery pipelines, and advanced combinatorial screening protocols. It’s often through shared frustrations—wasted batches, reaction failures, failed purifications—that best practices emerge and spread. For every story of a failed reaction, there’s often a switch to this intermediate in subsequent attempts. That’s how reputation grows, not from marketing brochures but from transparently documented bench work and word-of-mouth between researchers.
Training the next generation of chemists means handing them not only the best techniques but also the reagents that give them the highest chance for success. In my early days, time was wasted on molecules with more reputation than merit. Today, I encourage budding scientists to scrutinize suppliers, dive into analytical data, and make informed choices grounded in both literature and the institutional experience of their lab partners.
Innovation relies on openness, rigorous data, and persistent questioning—qualities at the heart of Google’s E-E-A-T principles. Compounds like 4-(2-Bromoethyl)Piperazine-1-Carboxylic Acid Tert-Butyl Ester support these principles by maintaining transparent sourcing, reproducible results, and supporting robust peer feedback. The science community expects adaptation in the face of emerging challenges: new targets, tougher regulatory guidelines, evolving climate for environmental responsibility. By anchoring projects with proven, reliable intermediates, labs lower risk and open bandwidth for tackling complexity higher up the chain.
As the therapeutic and advanced material landscapes grow more intricate, demand for versatile, trustworthy building blocks follows suit. Suppliers and scientists alike invest more in validated documentation, batch consistency, and responsive technical support. Anecdotal trial and error step back as rigorous comparative trials fill the pages of journals and conference presentations. Standardized quality metrics, third-party verification, and community-driven feedback loops set new benchmarks for what constitutes a trusted intermediate.
Behind every modeled reaction, every synthetic plan, and every research milestone sits a team balancing deadlines, budgets, and mission objectives. Choosing the best intermediates means those teams have a smoother path forward, spend less time troubleshooting, and can push boundaries rather than patching up underperforming reaction steps. Years in the lab taught me to respect well-made, well-documented reagents over flashy marketing gimmicks or one-off deals.
In choosing 4-(2-Bromoethyl)Piperazine-1-Carboxylic Acid Tert-Butyl Ester over alternatives, labs worldwide show what matters in modern research—consistency, transparency, and a practical edge that stems from real-world experience. Whether driving innovation in the pharmaceutical sector, advanced materials, or core academic research, this compound demonstrates the difference that can come from mixing trusted history with thoughtful design. For researchers, educators, and industry partners, the choice of building blocks shapes the boundaries of what’s possible long before the final results ever reach publication.