|
HS Code |
545387 |
| Chemical Name | 4-(2-Bromoethyl)acetophenone |
| Cas Number | 61315-86-6 |
| Molecular Formula | C10H11BrO |
| Molecular Weight | 227.10 |
| Appearance | White to light yellow solid |
| Melting Point | 63-66°C |
| Solubility | Slightly soluble in water, soluble in organic solvents |
| Purity | Typically >97% |
| Smiles | CC(=O)C1=CC=C(C=C1)CCBr |
| Inchi | InChI=1S/C10H11BrO/c1-8(12)9-2-4-10(5-3-9)6-7-11/h2-5H,6-7H2,1H3 |
| Storage Conditions | Store in a cool, dry place, tightly closed |
| Hazard Statements | May cause irritation to skin, eyes, and respiratory tract |
As an accredited 4-(2-Bromoethyl)Acetophenone factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | |
| Shipping | |
| Storage |
Competitive 4-(2-Bromoethyl)Acetophenone prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to admin@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: admin@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Most research labs deal with a daily influx of chemical building blocks, but 4-(2-Bromoethyl)Acetophenone stands apart for reasons both practical and scientific. For someone who’s spent years handling aromatic ketones, this compound marks its territory by providing a unique blend of reactivity and structural versatility. There’s a distinctive quality to its bromoethyl side chain—a feature that changes the way chemists think about functionalization. While you see a lot of bromo-derivatives floating around, not all bring the reliability and adaptability needed in actual bench work.
It’s easy to spot what sets this compound apart. The molecule combines an acetophenone core with a strategically placed bromoethyl group, making it a valuable node for subsequent transformations. In practical use, laboratories leverage its structure for cross-coupling and ene reactions. My experience with its bromoalkyl group confirms how it provides a handle for substitution—something not all acetophenone derivatives offer. This feature opens up new pathways when designing analogues or branching toward more complex aromatic structures. With purity levels exceeding 98% in reputable commercial sources, you don’t waste time worrying about side products or inconsistent results. Stability during storage is reassuring, especially for those who work in climates where temperature swings threaten shelf-life.
Every chemist knows the frustration of ambiguous reagent quality, but 4-(2-Bromoethyl)Acetophenone offers transparency where it matters. Visibly, this solid takes on an off-white to pale yellow tone; the color can serve as a quick purity marker in many lab settings. Melting points hover around the 38-40°C range, making handling straightforward during standard laboratory protocols. In terms of solubility, acetophenone and bromoethyl moieties merge to produce intermediate polarity; this allows the compound to dissolve easily in solvents like DCM, acetone, and THF. The odor strikes a mild, slightly sweet note—less pungent than alkyl bromides, which can dominate the workbench. Safety practices remain consistent with other bromo-compounds. Wearing gloves and goggles is a non-negotiable, and good ventilation saves headaches down the line.
Ask synthesis chemists where 4-(2-Bromoethyl)Acetophenone fits, and you’ll hear a litany of strategic applications. Halide-containing acetophenones get plenty of use as intermediates, but the two-carbon bromoethyl chain allows for distinctive transformations. You can build heterocycles, extend aromatic systems, or introduce further substitutions at the terminal position. In medicinal chemistry, this adaptability gives it an edge for creating focused libraries of analogues. I’ve worked on alkylated benzene synthesis where the bromoethyl group creates clean, predictable bonds in both SN2 and SN1 conditions, depending on the nucleophile. This reliable behavior supports both exploratory reactions and scale-up production. Anyone trying to design drugs or agrochemicals appreciates the way this compound can introduce side chains without excessive byproducts.
There’s also the question of leaving groups. Could you swap out other halides for the bromo? Technically, yes, but in my experience, bromine balances reactivity and stability much better than its chloro or iodo cousins. Chlorinated analogues can show lackluster yields and sometimes push up purification costs; iodinated versions are more reactive, but harder to store with confidence. By contrast, bromoethyl groups on this acetophenone slide neatly into substitution or elimination reactions, letting you direct outcomes with greater control. This isn’t just theory—a few failed reactions have taught me that the choice of halide often separates easy wins from days spent troubleshooting my columns.
Ask someone who’s used both bromo- and chloro- derivatives on the acetophenone backbone which they prefer, and you'll usually get an answer centered on reaction performance. The extra electron-withdrawing power of bromine over chlorine plays a role. In reactions such as the alkylation of nucleophiles or transition-metal-catalyzed cross-couplings, bromo-compounds usually react faster and under milder conditions. This helps limit thermal degradation and side reactions. From a practical standpoint, less time spent coaxing stubborn reagents through activation means fewer unwanted surprises and more reproducible yields. If cost is a factor, choro-derivatives sometimes look more attractive, but the lower reactivity translates to higher operational risk—a gamble not everyone will take, especially when scaling up for pilot runs or production lots.
Bromoethylketones, specifically when attached to aromatic systems, allow for better selectivity in downstream reactions. Having seen both routes succeed and sputter, the difference becomes clear during purification. Fewer byproducts come off the column, less time and solvent are wasted, and you end up with a cleaner, more defined end product. This translates directly to greater efficiency in medicinal and crop science labs, where small changes in yield or impurity level can shape the fate of an entire project. The ability to fine-tune reactivity and product outcome isn’t academic; it directly impacts budget, workflow, and project timelines.
Every reputable supplier of 4-(2-Bromoethyl)Acetophenone backs up their product with comprehensive quality reports. Whether you’re working with a five-gram bottle or a hundred-gram drum, manufacturers typically subject batches to HPLC or GC-MS analysis to confirm both purity and identity. I’ve always checked these reports myself—small discrepancies in purity can derail sensitive assays, especially in medicinal chemistry where trace impurities impact downstream validations. Because the bromoethyl group opens up so many possibilities for further substitution, contamination from competing haloalkyls or oxidized products could introduce real confusion to interpretive work. Reliable characterization through NMR and MS signals confidence that what you’re measuring is truly the compound on the label. Regular audits and professional oversight in chemical manufacturing keep both buyers and users accountable.
Sitting in on safety seminars over the years, I’ve learned respect for the potential hazards of halogenated organic compounds, especially those equipped to act as alkylating agents. 4-(2-Bromoethyl)Acetophenone requires thoughtful handling, something every lab worker should take seriously. Robust ventilation and protective gear are routine in my lab; skin contact or inhalation poses both acute and chronic risks. Proper waste disposal follows strict guidelines—never down the drain. Chemical-specific spill kits and regularly maintained emergency stations support a safe working environment. Regular training fosters a culture where everyone feels empowered to slow down and double-check protocols; this prevents unnecessary accidents and maintains the quality of results, which supports both personal health and institutional reputations.
Anyone developing functionalized benzenes encounters bottlenecks at some stage. Whether you’re modifying pharmacophores for bioactivity or expanding polymer backbones, the choices you make regarding starting materials direct the whole strategy. The bromoethyl group, with its moderate length and flexible reactivity, neatly bridges the gap between simple halogenation and full alkyl extension. In drug discovery, medicinal chemists often seek to introduce polar or basic handles a few atoms away from an aromatic core; 4-(2-Bromoethyl)Acetophenone helps create these frameworks with a minimum of synthetic steps. Skilled practitioners use it for introducing ethylamine side chains via substitution, which applies broadly in the synthesis of bioactive amines, alcohols, and other functional groups.
Polymers and advanced materials research similarly gain from the kinetic profile offered by this compound. Functional group compatibility with common solvents and catalysts simplifies incorporation into pre-polymerization reactions or chain extensions. As someone who has worked on material precursors for optoelectronic applications, I can say that finding reagents that balance reactivity and selectivity improves downstream performance. This keeps costs in check, since less aggressive conditions mean lower energy input and fewer environmental controls needed for scale-up. Chemical engineers appreciate this kind of flexibility, translating to safer, more sustainable processes in manufacturing plants.
Practical challenges arise during scale-up, especially with bromo-containing intermediates. Batch-to-batch consistency, solvent choice, and workup complexity sometimes threaten to limit throughput. Distilling my own experience with scale transitions, I’ve learned that incremental changes—swapping a solvent, tweaking a base, or adjusting temperature—go a long way toward remedying these problems. Engaging directly with suppliers helps, too. Requesting updated analytical reports and staying alert to differences in crystalline morphology improve predictability in outcomes when shifting from small-batch to kilo-scale production. A culture of open communication between researchers and manufacturers encourages continuous improvement and accountability. Regular reviews of reaction procedures—ideally with a small cross-functional team—catch problems before they snowball.
Another hurdle comes from byproduct formation. Halogenated reagents, left unchecked, sometimes veer off into unexpected territory, especially under basic conditions. Careful control of pH, reaction time, and temperature have always helped me minimize side-chain degradation or over-reaction. Using real-time analytical tools like TLC, NMR, or even in-line IR keeps unexpected products in check. I’ve found that newer purification materials, such as specialized silica or polymer resins, dramatically reduce product loss during isolation. Proper training and the right analytical tools let labs stay one step ahead of contamination, benefiting both day-to-day operations and long-term project goals.
Storage deserves more attention than it usually gets. Despite reasonable bench stability, excess humidity or bright light will compromise sensitive aromatic bromides. My practice includes storing 4-(2-Bromoethyl)Acetophenone in amber bottles with desiccant packets, inside a cool, dark cabinet. Regular rotation of stock and dated labeling make sure nothing sits forgotten. Consistent awareness in handling and storage protects both research investments and worker safety, ensuring reagents perform as expected months after purchase.
Across all sectors, sustainable chemistry has shifted from an aspiration to an expectation. The advantages of 4-(2-Bromoethyl)Acetophenone in synthesis do not exempt it from growing scrutiny over environmental impact. Reducing halogenated waste requires more than careful disposal; ongoing development of greener synthetic routes and recycling methods for bromo-derivatives offer real promise. New protocols look at phase-transfer catalysis, solvent-free methods, and even photochemical reactions to cut energy use and improve atom economy. I’ve seen colleagues pilot small-scale continuous flow systems to fine-tune yields and reduce exposure—these innovations may soon reach mainstream application, bringing safety and sustainability into better alignment.
Procurement professionals and academic researchers both take note of new supply chain strategies. Whether it’s sourcing from suppliers who use renewable energy or tracking environmental compliance records, buyers look for more than just the lowest cost per gram. Certification programs, regular third-party audits, and transparent reporting build lasting confidence among professional users. These industry movements, combined with advances in chemical lifecycle management, make it easier to advocate for sustainable practices without slowing down research or driving up costs. Broader access to reliable, well-characterized 4-(2-Bromoethyl)Acetophenone means projects can move forward with less downtime, fewer compliance headaches, and greater peace of mind.
Chemical research relies on incremental advances—each new derivative expands the toolkit for problem-solvers across industries. 4-(2-Bromoethyl)Acetophenone exemplifies the practical side of innovation: real-world reliability for both the hands-on organic chemist and the efficiency-minded process developer. Its chemistry supports the bridging of lab discoveries with scalable manufacturing. In my experiences collaborating with multidisciplinary teams, common ground is found in reagents like this, where the balance of reactivity, selectivity, and safety supports a seamless flow between idea and implementation. The compound’s flexible core allows research teams to push boundaries in pharmaceuticals, specialty polymers, and advanced materials without retooling entire workflows for each new project.
Regulatory interest grows every year, covering worker exposure and environmental disposal. Having experience filing both regulatory and safety documentation, I know how consistent hazard communication and coordinated chemical stewardship lower the risk of citations or operational delays. Adopting best practices in handling, documentation, and training makes it possible to keep innovation moving forward while respecting increasingly high standards of compliance. Given its prevalence in significant research and commercial projects, 4-(2-Bromoethyl)Acetophenone serves as a bellwether for broader trends in laboratory and industrial chemical management. Labs that prioritize safety and sustainability while maximizing the compound’s unique chemistry are positioned for ongoing success as regulatory and market landscapes shift.
Researchers and product developers continually seek ways to harness the power of flexible intermediates. Ongoing attention to process optimization, waste reduction, and greener protocols continues to expand what’s possible with 4-(2-Bromoethyl)Acetophenone. It’s exciting to see collaborations forming between academic labs, corporate R&D centers, and government oversight agencies. These groups share data, troubleshoot recurring pain points, and foster an open environment for collective progress. Conversations at conferences, as well as online knowledge exchanges, show that new applications appear year after year, building on decades of foundational work while looking ahead to yet-unexplored chemical space.
Embracing these collaborative trends means more widespread understanding of both the strengths and pitfalls of specific intermediates. My experience has taught me that staying informed through peer networks and professional organizations shortens the time between problem identification and solution discovery. Suggestions trickle in for reaction improvements and scale-up troubleshooting—often from unexpected sources. It isn’t just knowledge that gets exchanged, but a shared sense of responsibility for continual improvement. As new methodologies emerge and regulatory expectations climb, these collective efforts ensure that compounds like 4-(2-Bromoethyl)Acetophenone support not only innovation but responsible and sustainable science.
For professionals handling specialty chemicals, building trust remains a top priority. Transparency in sourcing, quality control, and application data underpins confidence—whether for single-use projects or repeated processes in manufacturing. Open access to batch-specific analytical certificates and safety documentation helps everyone make informed choices. In my role, I always dig into these details, because predictable performance and clear accountability support the critical work of research and scale-up. Relationships built on transparency lead to smoother supply agreements, fewer disruptions, and lower overall cost from prevented mishaps and errors. The experiences I’ve shared with colleagues, from navigating reagent discrepancies to troubleshooting procedural headaches, consistently reinforce the value of clear communication and mutual trust in chemical procurement and application.
Choosing compounds for research and industrial use always carries implications beyond the lab. 4-(2-Bromoethyl)Acetophenone, built upon a sturdy foundation of reliable performance and versatile reactivity, continues to play a valued role in advancing both science and industry. As professional communities drive toward greater openness, safety, and environmental responsibility, the future for this compound—and the people who rely on it—looks brighter than ever.