|
HS Code |
652890 |
| Chemical Name | 3-Trifluoromethyl-4-Bromoiodobenzene |
| Cas Number | 1173138-73-8 |
| Molecular Formula | C7H3BrF3I |
| Molecular Weight | 353.90 |
| Appearance | Pale yellow to orange solid |
| Melting Point | 39-43°C |
| Purity | Typically ≥97% |
| Density | 2.15 g/cm³ (approximate) |
| Storage Conditions | Store at 2-8°C, protected from light and moisture |
| Solubility | Slightly soluble in common organic solvents |
| Smiles | C1=CC(=C(C=C1Br)C(F)(F)F)I |
| Inchi | InChI=1S/C7H3BrF3I/c8-5-2-1-4(7(10,11)12)3-6(5)9/h1-3H |
As an accredited 3-Trifluoromethyl-4-Bromoiodobenzene factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | |
| Shipping | |
| Storage |
Competitive 3-Trifluoromethyl-4-Bromoiodobenzene prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to admin@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: admin@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Chemists spend time searching for efficient and versatile building blocks that drive progress in pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, and advanced materials. Among the more intriguing options, 3-Trifluoromethyl-4-Bromoiodobenzene offers unique value, especially in research and development settings where precision, functional group compatibility, and structural complexity play significant roles. From early-stage lead optimization to late-stage diversification, this compound brings an unmistakable edge.
With a molecular structure that combines a trifluoromethyl group at the 3-position, bromine at the 4-position, and iodine on the phenyl ring, this compound achieves a responsive balance between reactivity and selectivity. Its formula, C7H3BrF3I, and molecular weight around 370 g/mol, make it easily distinguished from other halogenated benzenes, not just in lab catalogs but in practical synthesis. Fluorinated motifs like trifluoromethyl groups often improve bioavailability and metabolic stability for drug designers. The coexistence of bromine and iodine isn't common, giving this compound greater utility for stepwise cross-coupling or halogen exchange reactions.
Years in organic synthesis leave you keenly aware of bottlenecks and side reactions that soak up resources and patience alike. The structure of 3-Trifluoromethyl-4-Bromoiodobenzene encourages highly specific functionalization steps. As a chemist, I've found the direct combination of bromine and iodine handy—they offer two distinct points for further transformation, such as Suzuki, Stille, or Sonogashira couplings. In practice, selective activation lets you install complex fragments sequentially, reducing side reactions and wasted reagents. That flexibility means you don't have to settle for single-halide intermediates, which often force extra steps just to achieve similar complexity.
Medicinal chemists push molecules into places that matter. Introducing a trifluoromethyl group into small molecules can improve lipophilicity, binding affinity, and metabolic resilience—a trio that increases the odds a compound survives early screening. 3-Trifluoromethyl-4-Bromoiodobenzene fits these goals, serving as a scaffold adaptable to target diverse protein pockets through judicious molecular tinkering. I've seen project groups shave weeks off timelines by leveraging bromo-iodo activation for parallel synthesis arrays; fewer protection-deprotection cycles mean more hits for screening and less wasted starting material.
Many halogenated benzenes feature just one type of halogen. Multiple halides, especially bromine and iodine, give chemists switches for fine control. Iodine tends to couple under milder conditions, opening routes for late-stage diversification. Bromine survives many transformations but steps in when tougher conditions become necessary. In my experience, having both sites on the same molecule lets you run sequential or orthogonal chemistries, often without isolating intermediates. You can run a selective iodination, install an aryl amine, then go back to the bromine site for a metal-catalyzed alkylation, all on the same core. That economy of steps brings real value on tight timelines or budgets.
Anybody who has worked in fluorine chemistry will appreciate how the trifluoromethyl group shapes molecular properties. This group raises chemical stability, blocks metabolic “hot spots,” and improves cell membrane permeability. Though trifluoromethylated aromatics cost more, they pay back in hits during lead discovery. In past projects, replacing a simple methyl with trifluoromethyl has bumped up potency or selectivity by orders of magnitude—sometimes making a stalled project viable again. In agrochemical development, the group keeps compounds stable in harsh soil or sunlight, stretching field effectiveness. On the bench, I choose molecules like this when I want a quick read on fluorine’s contribution before the expense of synthesizing heavily engineered candidates.
Having access to broad-spectrum building blocks opens doors outside pharmaceuticals. The performance properties driven by the trifluoromethyl and dual halide groups suit agricultural and material science as well. Crop scientists seeking pest control often lean on halogenated organics for activity against insects and fungi. The same attributes that guard pharmaceuticals against enzymatic breakdown also keep agrochemicals persistent in the environment, provided stewardship balances those qualities with environmental safety. Advanced materials incorporate fluorinated aromatics for hydrophobicity and electrical properties. This compound’s dense electron-withdrawing profile shapes polymer building blocks, giving devices water resistance or fine-tuned dielectric constants.
In the search for alternatives, it becomes clear that few compounds match this molecule’s unique combination of features. 4-Bromo-iodobenzene, lacking the trifluoromethyl group, delivers reactivity but can't improve physicochemical properties as much. Trifluoromethyl-iodobenzene offers just one coupling site. Blending both halides onto one aromatic ring with trifluoromethyl stacking on the side makes for a more versatile option. Labs working with only bromo-derivatives often face challenges synthesizing libraries—missing the ability to easily differentiate functionalization steps. Single-halide compounds mean extra synthetic maneuvers if you want to create unsymmetrical substitution patterns. Time, labor, and raw material bills stack up, and these challenges aren't limited to pharma; similar bottlenecks pop up in materials and crop protection discovery.
Working with highly functionalized aromatic compounds means balancing performance with safety and shelf life. 3-Trifluoromethyl-4-Bromoiodobenzene stands up well under standard storage conditions—dark, dry, controlled room temperature. It doesn’t show the unpredictable degradation or volatility found in lighter, less stable halobenzenes. In my own work, I notice minimal deterioration over time, which keeps downstream reactions reproducible from batch to batch. That reliability trickles into lab scheduling and confidence that trial runs will mirror scale-up work. Bench chemists appreciate not having to make last-minute substitutions because of decomposed stocks.
Balancing cost versus synthetic efficiency hits every chemistry budget. These halogenated, fluorinated benzenes don't land on the low end in terms of price, given the cost of raw halogen sources and the complexity of synthesis. Still, they often replace multi-step sequences that need separate halogenations and multiple purifications. In settings where speed matters—patent deadlines, screening campaigns, or product launches—time trimmed off the workflow makes up for the higher ticket price. Many experienced chemists discover that compounds offering dual reactivity, like this one, save enough on labor and overhead to make a clear case for their adoption.
Sustainability ranks high in chemical innovation these days. Each extra synthetic step means more waste and energy consumption. Having both bromine and iodine on a trifluoromethylated benzene shrinks the synthetic route for complicated molecules, translating into less waste produced per gram of target compound. That makes sense, whether you care about carbon footprint or just want to maximize the efficiency of your research pipeline. I personally favor using reagents that shave off steps since every avoided workup or purification means fewer solvents and less leftover hazardous material. Green chemistry isn’t only for large-scale production—streamlined synthesis makes even early research projects more sustainable by design.
Chemists value reproducibility above all—nobody enjoys running a dozen trial reactions when the literature suggests one should suffice. 3-Trifluoromethyl-4-Bromoiodobenzene, with its high purity and robust physical form, performs consistently across runs, from university research groups to contract manufacturing organizations. In my experience, switching to this molecule can solve mystery problems in low-yielding or inconsistent cross-coupling reactions. Even junior chemists, new to halogen-based syntheses, achieve clean conversions without endless troubleshooting. That kind of reliability earns trust quickly and supports broader adoption in multidisciplinary labs.
Looking at a real-world drug development scenario, lead diversification often hinges on the ability to attach bulkier groups or explore SAR around a core scaffold. Our team faced an array of biaryls during kinase inhibitor optimization. Standard bromo- or iodo-benzenes limited us to stepwise approaches, dragging timelines longer and raising exposure to potentially hazardous intermediates. Swap in 3-Trifluoromethyl-4-Bromoiodobenzene, and each round of analog development happens faster. The bromine and iodine sites support parallel exploration, letting us add aromatic or alkynyl groups at one site and polar functionalities at the other. Hits discovered with this approach mapped new chemical space that a simpler phenyl system wouldn’t allow. Final data showed improved metabolic stability and bioactivity—facts that justify the investment in this more capable intermediate.
Navigating safety regulations and compliance standards forms another layer of decision-making. Many researchers worry about the reactivity and toxicity associated with highly halogenated or fluorinated compounds. In practice, bench-scale use of 3-Trifluoromethyl-4-Bromoiodobenzene fits within accepted risk management guidelines. Basic protective measures—gloves, goggles, fume hood use—manage risks as expected. Unlike more reactive iodinating agents or volatile halosubstituted aromatics, it doesn’t volatilize easily or release hazardous byproducts under routine conditions. Having workable safety parameters makes it easier for labs operating in regulated spaces or shared university environments to justify adding this reagent to their toolkit.
Material scientists often look to organic molecules that can tune surface properties, dielectric constants, or optical qualities. The electron-rich nature of the trifluoromethyl group affects polarity, influencing polymer backbone alignments or thin film morphologies. Devices from OLEDs to sensor platforms can benefit from building blocks like this, where specific halogen substitutions guide molecular packing in films or affect response rates in functional surfaces. In my own collaborations with material science groups, deploying 3-Trifluoromethyl-4-Bromoiodobenzene opened up pathways for embedding multiple reactivity points—prerequisites in designing complicated macromolecular architectures. Results include better adherence, improved device yield, and longer lifespans under stress, compared to simpler halogenated materials.
Talk to researchers who’ve navigated the challenges of small-molecule synthesis, and you’ll hear about missed deadlines, rerun experiments, or wasted batches stemming from limited starting materials. Ask about the gains made with versatile intermediates, and you’ll hear about new patent filings, streamlined SAR campaigns, and breakthroughs in both human and animal health projects. There’s a persistent lesson: access to multifunctional reagents changes the trajectory of difficult projects. Personally, projects involving perfluoroalkyl aromatics almost always proceed with fewer dead ends or tedious optimizations. Seasoned chemists know that fighting with inert aromatics can turn enthusiastic research into a slog—choosing engineered intermediates shifts the odds back in favor of creative discovery and actual progress.
No compound solves every synthetic rat’s nest. Using multihalogenated, fluorinated benzenes does ask for careful handling of metal contamination, as leftover palladium or copper from couplings can compromise downstream assays. Solvent choice warrants attention—solubility swings based on fluorine content and halogen placement, so old favorites like DMF or DMSO may perform differently than expected. In my lab, we keep notes on which combinations yield the cleanest product and the highest conversion—information that minimizes waste and supports successful scale-up. Purification methods matter as well; modern chromatography often pulls fluorinated aromatics through faster, calling for calibration and test runs before loading expensive compounds onto columns.
The growing popularity of cross-coupling reactions and the persistent demand for molecular innovation keep this compound in active circulation across academic, biotech, and industrial labs. The chemical community keeps inventing new catalyst systems, expanding the utility of bromo-iodo-fluoro aromatics. Artificial intelligence in retrosynthetic planning often picks multifunctional building blocks like this one, conserving precious resources and opening new pathways previously overlooked by trial-and-error. As analytical chemistry grows sharper, the ability to track subtle differences in product purity, reaction kinetics, and impurity profiles helps chemists extract every ounce of value from these advanced intermediates. Nobody can predict every breakthrough, but the recurring value of flexible, carefully engineered aromatic compounds marks them as enduring mainstays.
Modern research groups mentoring students or onboarding new staff seldom have the luxury of months-long training. Streamlined reagents help flatten the learning curve. Half a decade ago, I watched graduate students struggle to piece together complicated aromatics from building blocks with only one “handle.” Newer cohorts, using 3-Trifluoromethyl-4-Bromoiodobenzene, leapfrog early bottlenecks, focusing on experimental design instead of endless troubleshooting. As science expands across borders—embracing more diversity in research teams and project scope—access to robust, broadly applicable reagents lets everyone compete on fairer terms. Whether working on next-generation medicines, resilient crops, or smart materials, chemists with the right tools can focus energy and creativity on discovery, not drudgery.
Through years at the bench, the advantages of smartly designed building blocks become clear. 3-Trifluoromethyl-4-Bromoiodobenzene stands out for its dual reactivity, chemical robustness, and the ability to push projects forward in pharmaceuticals, agriculture, and advanced materials. While it doesn't replace every simpler starting material, its value in enabling shorter, cleaner synthetic routes, supporting high-impact research, and broadening the toolkit of today’s scientists is hard to overstate. The story of this molecule reflects a broader truth: the best innovations often come from those quietly powerful ingredients that let creative minds work with fewer roadblocks and more possibilities.