|
HS Code |
775744 |
| Chemical Name | 3-Fluorophenylmethylenedibromide |
| Cas Number | 1071-66-9 |
| Molecular Formula | C7H5Br2F |
| Molecular Weight | 267.93 g/mol |
| Appearance | Colorless to pale yellow liquid |
| Purity | Typically ≥98% |
| Boiling Point | Approx. 114-115°C at 15 mmHg |
| Density | 1.89 g/cm³ |
| Solubility | Insoluble in water; soluble in organic solvents |
| Refractive Index | 1.593 (approximate) |
| Storage Condition | Store tightly closed in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area |
| Smiles | FC1=CC=CC(=C1)C(Br)Br |
| Inchi | InChI=1S/C7H5Br2F/c8-7(9)5-2-1-3-6(10)4-5/h1-4,7H |
| Hazard Statements | Harmful if swallowed, causes skin and eye irritation |
As an accredited 3-Fluorophenylmethylenedibromide factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | |
| Shipping | |
| Storage |
Competitive 3-Fluorophenylmethylenedibromide prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to admin@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: admin@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
With more research teams looking for specialized reagents to shape new pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, and materials, attention turns to precision tools that speed up discovery but hold up to scrutiny. Among these, 3-Fluorophenylmethylenedibromide deserves a closer look. This organic compound, recognized by its two strategically placed bromine atoms and a fluorine substituted phenyl ring, achieves more than a routine dibromide compound.
From conversations with colleagues at university and stories shared during project deadlines, I know how much frustration can come from poorly defined building blocks. Some dibromides introduce side-reactivity or struggle during cross-coupling. This one arrives with streamlined reactivity, shaped for selective manipulations. In the hands of a trained organic chemist, the compound brings out reliable reactions, a touchstone in the quest for complexity and control.
Chemists are always balancing cost and outcome. If a model reagent can simplify a step, ensure clean conversion, or make the difference between a string of failed syntheses and a crisp, workable pathway, the whole project looks brighter. In my own experience in the lab, switching to this compound shaved hours off troubleshooting for aromatic substitution reactions. Its two bromine leaving groups offer just the right amount of reactivity, and the para-fluorine often serves as a tunable electronic feature for further modifications.
In pharmaceutical development, making molecules with sharp, predictable biological properties takes robust scaffolds. The 3-fluorophenyl backbone echoes in many active agents, from CNS drugs to enzyme inhibitors. With the twin bromides, scientists attach a range of side chains—alkyls, amines, aryl groups—using established metal-catalyzed coupling reactions like Suzuki, Heck, or Sonogashira. The para-fluoro group steers reactivity, sometimes increasing selectivity in late-stage functionalizations.
Unlike standard dibromides without electronic modulation, 3-Fluorophenylmethylenedibromide behaves with greater consistency under cross-coupling conditions. This means lower risk of unwanted byproducts during multi-step syntheses and better yields on the bench. The difference comes alive during scale-up, where every reaction must run exactly as planned. My colleagues in industrial settings value this level of reliability; one even credits it for cutting production costs for a small molecule active ingredient in half.
The physically pure solid appears as a crystalline powder, often off-white to pale yellow. Purity levels can exceed 98 percent by HPLC, though experienced hands always verify batch-to-batch with NMR and mass spectrometry. Melting points cluster tightly, typically above 80 degrees Celsius, so it handles without fuss at room temperature with proper ventilation. After years of handling related reagents, I’ve never seen concerns for volatility or decomposition under standard conditions; common sense and PPE go a long way. As with all brominated aromatics, appropriate ventilation and prompt washing after accidental contact remain critical best practices.
The synthetic route usually involves bromination followed by fluorination or vice versa, giving reproducible access to gram or kilogram scale, depending on research needs. Supply partners who understand batch consistency and traceability ease headaches when moving from bench-top to kilo lab. I once ran into an incident where a supplier cut corners on purification—luckily, chromatographic analysis flagged the incorrect isomer and saved a week of misdirected effort.
Storage recommendations call for a tightly capped bottle, shielded from direct sunlight and moisture. My own lab stores it with other aryl halides in a ventilated cabinet. Regular inventory checks, enforced by a quick TLC analysis, catch degraded lots before they enter sensitive reactions. Disposal follows standard protocol for brominated aromatics, collected with halogenated organic waste and handed to professional chemical waste handlers.
Chemists looking for comparison often mention benzylidene dibromides or other substituted diaryl dibromides. Most lack the intrinsic influence of a fluorine substituent, which shifts the compound’s electron density, something that, as a student, I first overlooked until I saw the difference in yields during a graduate project. Simple benzylidene dibromides react more sluggishly, or open routes for undesirable isomers. In contrast, the 3-fluoro derivative hones selectivity in both aromatic substitutions and cyclizations.
This compound also resists unwanted side-reactions common to more activated dibromo analogues. In electrophilic aromatic substitutions, its moderate reactivity allows for careful additions rather than over-addition or polymerization, a pitfall for those who rush with hyper-reactive analogues. The learning curve for junior chemists shortens, as experiment after experiment delivers expected results, reinforcing fundamental reaction mechanisms.
Beyond chemical robustness, there’s the matter of sustainability. Unlike some derivatives that require exotic or high-waste precursors, most syntheses of 3-Fluorophenylmethylenedibromide work with widely available starting materials. This subtle but important difference reduces upstream environmental impact and helps labs stay within regulatory guardrails. For academic researchers, it’s a quiet win, freeing funds and conscience in settings where every dollar and every drop of solvent counts.
Walk down the hall of a graduate research building, and the uses of 3-Fluorophenylmethylenedibromide pop up everywhere in notebooks. One project might harness it in a cross-coupling screen to build a library of N-aryl heterocycles for anti-cancer testing. In another, material scientists might chain it to a silane linker, then spin it into self-assembling monolayers on silicon wafers. Members of my own group once relied on it for a photophysical probe, where the fluorinated aromatics provided precise control over electron transfer rates.
Medicinal chemists appreciate the way the para-fluoro substituent tailors the molecule’s properties. By nudging electron density, it changes how attached substituents interact with target proteins, which can enhance binding or improve metabolic stability. I’ve discussed with peers in drug discovery who mark this step as critical for tuning ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion) profiles.
Outside drug discovery, the material science community taps into the stability and reactivity profile for developing novel polymers or functionalized surfaces. In electronics, molecules with strategic fluorination resist degradation by heat and photooxidation, supporting device longevity. Collaborators in chemical engineering relay that this edge shortens development cycles for thin film coatings used in solar panels or organic LEDs.
Of course, every reagent enters the world of trade-offs. The presence of two bromines means increased scrutiny for environmental impact. Brominated byproducts find themselves at the center of green chemistry debates. My own work now leans toward evaluating new dehalogenation and recycling techniques, so waste bromides return to productive use rather than enter the waste stream. Smart labs pre-plan reaction sequences to minimize excess, combining steps where possible to avoid isolated intermediates.
Not all suppliers guarantee the same quality, though, and I’ve seen failed reactions traced to sub-par batches—sometimes from disreputable or unaccredited sources. Responsible sourcing matters, and researchers do well to verify supplier credentials and request up-to-date analysis certificates. A reputable chemical supplier supports traceability, provides consistent batches, and often shares findings from application support or troubleshooting. More than once, I learned tricks from supplier technical notes that improved reaction outcomes.
Health and safety protocols follow established aryl halide guidelines. While the compound poses no exotic hazards, inhalation and skin contact call for vigilance. In my lab, exposure control and immediate cleanup dropped minor accidents to zero. Comprehensive education on chemical hygiene, including routine glove changes and fume hood practices, helps keep early-career researchers safe and confident.
As research institutions, pharmaceutical developers, and material manufacturers pivot toward more conscious innovation, compounds like 3-Fluorophenylmethylenedibromide find a central place. The growing push for data transparency, from batch composition to real-world application success, pairs with regulators’ increasing interest in lifecycle analysis. Some labs now document full routes and waste streams, setting benchmarks for greener synthetic methods. Peer-reviewed journals value robust, repeatable data, and clarity in methodology—areas where precision starting materials make all the difference.
Students and senior researchers alike see benefits from the predictability of this compound. Clean reactions free up time to ask bigger questions. Reliable intermediates seed new discoveries. The subtle differences imparted by the fluorine, especially, reveal unforeseen possibilities—a better probe for a subtle enzyme, a more stable radiolabel, or a new handle on bio-conjugation. In my years of hands-on chemistry, few details matter more than those that trim the noise and bring order to complexity.
Shared experience convinces me that 3-Fluorophenylmethylenedibromide represents more than a sum of its functional groups. The ease with which it transforms under palladium catalysis, the selectivity that fluorine introduces, and the solid supply chains now available combine to make it a favorite of those who appreciate efficiency in bench chemistry. The difference to a synthetic scheme, or to a whole program’s trajectory, can be felt in months saved, publications secured, and discoveries made.
Science’s pace shows no signs of slowing. AI-guided retrosynthesis, high-throughput screening, and greener process design ask for building blocks that keep up. Major chemical technology hubs now feature advanced derivatives of key aryl halides, but reliability at core steps remains essential. Visiting industrial partners and reading between the lines of major patents, I see more groups switching to high-purity, well-characterized compounds like this. The results: reactions that scale, profiles that match target product specifications, and fewer painful surprises mid-way through development.
Sustainability also steps further into the discussion. I’ve witnessed the shift from bench-scale curiosity to eco-focused process design. Using aryl halides that avoid exotic or toxic precursors, and that lend themselves to waste minimization or even component recovery, will mark winners in the innovation race. Fluorinated aromatic intermediates once caught flack for persistence or bioaccumulation concerns, but disciplined use and focused downstream processing change how the scientific community perceives them. Ongoing government funding and NGO partnerships for circular chemistry encourage every chemist to rethink design from route selection to end of life, and 3-Fluorophenylmethylenedibromide fits smoothly into these new strategies.
Teaching the next generation to see reagents as more than simple bottles on a shelf—instead as levers for broader impact—counts for a lot. Each lesson in selectivity, each experiment in cross-coupling, builds skills for tomorrow’s inventors. Sharing best practices on handling, source verification, and disposal, as well as on harnessing the unique properties of this compound, spreads benefits widely.
In research, tools shape discovery. The best compounds invite bold questions and clear solutions. 3-Fluorophenylmethylenedibromide brings both. Looking through my own notebooks and those passed to me from trusted advisors, the recurring success of this compound in demanding applications stands out. Its role grows each year, quietly powering new routes in chemistry and industry, from drug discovery to nanotechnology. One reagent, well-chosen, supports a ripple effect of progress that touches far more than its original purpose.
Researchers scrambling to meet shorter timelines, smaller budgets, and higher regulatory expectations need tools that work. Selecting compounds with well-understood properties and proven heritage leads to more effective discovery. 3-Fluorophenylmethylenedibromide is one example of how thoughtful design, careful sourcing, and widespread experience combine to unlock possibilities. Every success counts, and with the right molecules in hand, the future of synthesis looks just a bit brighter.