|
HS Code |
548638 |
| Chemical Name | 3-Bromo-5-(Methylsulfonyl)Pyridine |
| Cas Number | 1030619-46-3 |
| Molecular Formula | C6H6BrNO2S |
| Molecular Weight | 236.09 g/mol |
| Appearance | White to off-white solid |
| Melting Point | 63-67°C |
| Purity | Typically ≥98% |
| Solubility | Soluble in organic solvents like DMSO and DMF |
| Smiles | CS(=O)(=O)C1=CC(=CN=C1)Br |
| Inchi | InChI=1S/C6H6BrNO2S/c1-11(9,10)6-3-5(7)2-4-8-6/h2-4H,1H3 |
| Storage Temperature | Store at 2-8°C |
As an accredited 3-Bromo-5-(Methylsulfonyl)Pyridine factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | |
| Shipping | |
| Storage |
Competitive 3-Bromo-5-(Methylsulfonyl)Pyridine prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to admin@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: admin@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
3-Bromo-5-(methylsulfonyl)pyridine sometimes pops up under its CAS number, 329794-36-3, and in just about every chemistry circle I’ve been a part of, this compound sparks curiosity. It stands out for its reliable behavior during synthesis and the mix of bromine and methylsulfonyl groups, which open unique avenues in building more complex molecules. The molecular formula C6H6BrNO2S gives a clue about its structure, but anyone who’s ever poured a powder into a flask knows the paper specs never tell the full story.
Working with 3-Bromo-5-(methylsulfonyl)pyridine, the first thing you notice is its appearance—usually a pale solid that dissolves nicely in common laboratory solvents like DMSO or DMF. The melting point tends to sit in a moderate range, making it manageable compared to some stubborn analogues. Chemists appreciate this, especially in multi-step synthesis, because less time fussing with solubility means more breathing room for actual creativity.
Its stability helps, too. Even after sitting in storage for a few months, I’ve found its purity stays consistent if kept away from light and moisture. The compound handles most reaction conditions well, especially for halogen-metal exchange or cross-coupling strategies. Unlike some similar pyridine derivatives, this one rarely shifts colors or traps water, so weighing and measuring it feels straightforward.
Organic synthesis never likes dead ends, and here, 3-Bromo-5-(methylsulfonyl)pyridine offers clear detours. Medicinal chemists and pharmaceutical teams often reach for it as an intermediate, especially when they want to build out heterocyclic scaffolds or fine-tune the electronic properties of a drug candidate. The bromine atom, sitting in the third position, makes it a prime candidate for Suzuki or Buchwald-Hartwig couplings, bringing in aryl or amine groups smoothly.
During one run in a mid-sized lab, I saw it bridge the gap in a project targeting kinase inhibitors—a hot topic in oncology drug discovery. The methylsulfonyl group does more than just hang out on the ring; it pushes electron density in a way that affects reactivity. Compared to 3-bromopyridine, which can act a bit stubborn, throwing on the methylsulfonyl group speeds up certain substitution reactions, opening access to analogues that would otherwise take a detour nobody wants to deal with.
Much of the wider chemical community values transparency in supply chains and the assurance that each batch behaves the same way. Whether a researcher prepares milligram screens or scales up to multigram runs for lead optimization, 3-bromo-5-(methylsulfonyl)pyridine consistently performs as promised, and this reliability translates directly to productivity and project timelines.
Pyridine derivatives have earned their reputation in both academic and industrial labs, but not all pyridines pull their weight the same way. The distinctiveness of this compound stems from the combined effect of the bromine atom and the methylsulfonyl group. Bromine, by itself, offers a straightforward route to build more complex aryl or heteroaryl systems; its size and leaving group ability let it fit nicely into cross-coupling protocols. Pyridines decorated only with a bromo substituent sometimes lack the versatility needed for sensitive transformations—side reactions, poor yields, and stability concerns often creep in.
Add the methylsulfonyl group, and things change. This sulfone-containing group brings a different kind of reactivity. It draws electron density away from the aromatic ring, making nearby sites more receptive to nucleophilic attack. I’ve watched colleagues compare methylthio, nitro, and methylsulfonyl derivatives side by side: the methylsulfonyl-pyridines often boast better yields in certain substitutions and fewer headaches cleaning up the reaction mixture. In other scenarios, the methylsulfonyl group becomes a useful leaving group, set to be removed under mild conditions to reveal new sites for further modification.
Sometimes, in late-stage functionalization—a strategy where chemists build molecular complexity at the last steps of synthesis—the downstream removal or transformation of the methylsulfonyl group enables rapid analoguing. This lets researchers test multiple variants without rebuilding their starting material from scratch. I’ve sat through meetings where choosing between a nitro, cyano, or sulfonyl group on a pyridine core meant either hitting a dead end or uncovering new chemical space ripe for exploration in agrochemical research or structure-activity relationship studies.
On the spectrum of halogenated pyridines, the differences between 3-bromo-5-(methylsulfonyl)pyridine and its cousins influence real-world workflow decisions. Take 3-bromopyridine, which lacks the fifth-position substituent. It’s a familiar face in classic cross-coupling, but without the electron-withdrawing effect of a group like methylsulfonyl, some tough bond constructions fall flat or demand more expensive catalysts and extreme conditions. Pairing bromine with a nitro group boosts reactivity even more, but nitro groups tend to be less stable under a range of synthetic conditions—especially if reduction or further functionalization is in the pipeline.
For medicinal chemists and material scientists alike, methylsulfonyl’s main strength lies in balance. It outfits the pyridine ring to move smoothly through a variety of synthetic steps, then hops off cleanly when it’s no longer needed. Its influence on solubility, reactivity, and downstream purification can save a week’s worth of troubleshooting. Years of batch data point to consistent melting points, good handling under inert atmosphere, and no unexpected exotherms—a reality I appreciate deeply after a late-night reaction goes awry due to a touchy starting material.
Handling any halogenated pyridine requires respect, and 3-bromo-5-(methylsulfonyl)pyridine is no different. In a time where both environmental and occupational safety matter, transparent practices and up-to-date safety data sheets guide every stage. I follow the standard PPE—lab coat, gloves, goggles—and always weigh out the material in a ventilated hood. This routine might sound boring, but incidents involving pyridine compounds have taught many of us not to let our guard down. Brominated compounds can irritate skin and eyes, and inhalation risk is real, especially if processing large amounts for industrial needs.
Waste disposal grows in importance as more labs adopt green chemistry initiatives. The structure of 3-bromo-5-(methylsulfonyl)pyridine means it falls under halogenated organic waste, so proper collection and incineration follow established regulatory frameworks in most countries. Storage recommendations—dry, cool conditions, away from incompatible chemicals—aren’t just bureaucracy; they keep shelf-stable compounds from turning into shelf-stable headaches. I’ve seen the results when flasks crack under pressure due to unnoticed contamination or careless stacking, and those lessons stick with you.
The environmental perspective keeps gaining ground too. Manufacturers work to minimize byproducts and refine synthetic routes for less hazardous waste. The drive for greener methods—whether using aqueous solvents, alternative oxidants, or energy-saving procedures—echoes in new research every month. My own teams have swapped out traditional reagents for ones with better safety profiles and less environmental persistence, and even small changes can prove worth the effort in scaling up for commercial production.
One common frustration is navigating procurement—slow lead times, batch variability, and incomplete technical support can derail entire projects. 3-Bromo-5-(methylsulfonyl)pyridine isn’t immune from these pains, but experienced labs partner with suppliers who provide clear batch histories, spectral data, and guaranteed purity. From my desk, direct communication with a supplier about reprocessing needs or shipment conditions saves hours chasing down inconsistencies later. Colleagues in developing nations share how consistent supply of specialty pyridines opens doors for independent research, supporting emerging pharma and agroscience communities worldwide.
Digital tools now link researchers and suppliers more closely than ever before. Access to strong analytical data—NMR, HPLC, and elemental analysis—backs up the claims on the product label. The field rewards those who ask for documentation, verify identity by in-house testing, and push for openness about synthetic origin. The drive for transparency fosters healthy competition and keeps everyone honest about minor impurities or batch-to-batch shifts that, if ignored, can snowball into wasted effort and missed deadlines.
The reach of 3-bromo-5-(methylsulfonyl)pyridine stretches way beyond organic synthesis textbooks. In the hands of medicinal chemists, it becomes a flexible stepping stone toward kinase inhibitors, anti-infectives, or CNS-active molecules. In the agrochemical sphere, its structure lets scientists modify pyridine-based herbicides or fungicides, dialing in selectivity or tweaking environmental degradation rates. Material scientists benefit too; new organic electronics depend on finely tuned heteroaromatic units, and this compound sometimes shapes the properties that drive improved conductivity or stability.
Teamwork with analytical chemists matters more than ever in these fields. Each application draws on the compound’s stable, predictable baseline but also its ability to pivot as project needs shift. That versatility can mean fewer new chemicals to validate, less time spent troubleshooting, and more resources focused on hitting research milestones or regulatory checkpoints. I’ve lost count of the projects where a single, dependable intermediate saves a downstream headache for the entire group, letting teams move quickly from hypothesis to proof-of-concept studies.
Building knowledge means more than just running reactions. As open data sets and peer-reviewed publications share more about how 3-bromo-5-(methylsulfonyl)pyridine performs under real conditions, best practices evolve and inefficiencies vanish. I often reference case studies, patents, and collaborative whitepapers when mapping out a new synthetic pathway, and I see younger chemists finding their footing faster thanks to access not just to raw materials, but to collective experience. The compound’s fingerprint across so many research articles sends a simple message: shared insight brings down barriers for everyone, from the lone bench chemist to international discovery teams.
The world of synthetic intermediates never stays still. New regulatory scrutiny keeps emerging, pushing for improved hazard labeling, better sustainability, and more ethical sourcing. While these changes can slow down traditional procurement or push up costs, the long-term benefits—reduced workplace incidents, less toxic waste, and more robust data on human or environmental fate—serve the community at large.
Developing better production routes remains a key area where both academic and commercial labs invest resources. Catalysis improvements, continuous flow processes, and biocatalytic methods all aim at producing 3-bromo-5-(methylsulfonyl)pyridine with reduced waste and improved yields. It’s already clear that sharing new findings, consistent batch analysis, and cross-disciplinary input—from engineering to environmental science to business planning—keeps progress steady. Open feedback loops between downstream users and producers shape new processes, drive quality standards, and anticipate emerging needs, closing the gap between bench-top discovery and real-world impact.
As science turns toward automation, machine learning, and data-driven decision-making, the role of well-characterized, versatile building blocks like 3-bromo-5-(methylsulfonyl)pyridine is only set to grow. Researchers now simulate reaction pathways or predict off-target activities using digital twins, but none of that’s possible without a strong foundation of reliable chemical feedstocks. For all the digital sparkle, hands-on experience with how real chemicals behave, how they handle, and how they fit into larger frameworks for innovation, remains critical.
My own experience says the community will keep pushing boundaries—tuning substituents to access undiscovered targets, sharing pitfalls openly, and demanding more from both products and information infrastructure. The next time a new therapeutic, crop-protection tool, or electronic device rolls off a research line, odds are strong it owes something to these seemingly modest intermediates that keep the wheels of progress turning just out of public view.