|
HS Code |
809324 |
| Product Name | 3-Bromo-5-Methoxyindole-1-Carboxylic Acid Tert-Butyl Ester |
| Molecular Formula | C14H16BrNO3 |
| Molecular Weight | 326.19 g/mol |
| Cas Number | 1431626-46-6 |
| Appearance | White to off-white solid |
| Purity | Typically >98% |
| Solubility | Soluble in organic solvents such as DMSO, DMF, and dichloromethane |
| Melting Point | 83-86°C |
| Storage Temperature | 2-8°C (refrigerated, protect from light) |
| Smiles | CC(C)(C)OC(=O)N1C=C(C2=C1C=C(OC)C=C2)Br |
| Inchi | InChI=1S/C14H16BrNO3/c1-14(2,3)19-13(18)16-8-10(15)9-6-11(17-4)7-12(9)16/h6-8H,1-4H3 |
| Synonyms | tert-Butyl 3-bromo-5-methoxy-1H-indole-1-carboxylate |
As an accredited 3-Bromo-5-Methoxyindole-1-Carboxylic Acid Tert-Butyl Ester factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | |
| Shipping | |
| Storage |
Competitive 3-Bromo-5-Methoxyindole-1-Carboxylic Acid Tert-Butyl Ester prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to admin@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: admin@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Here’s a compound that has been catching the attention of chemists aiming for greater precision in their work: 3-Bromo-5-Methoxyindole-1-Carboxylic Acid Tert-Butyl Ester. This is no simple aromatic – it taps into specialized indole chemistry, drawing together a specific arrangement of bromine and methoxy groups with a tert-butyl protected carboxylic acid. People often reach for such compounds when they want a backbone that holds up under tough conditions during multi-step synthesis, especially in medicinal, agrochemical, or even dye-related research. As someone who used to spend long hours in the synthesis lab, I remember the frustration that came from dealing with unstable intermediates or overly reactive carboxylic groups. Protection strategies were not just niceties – they made the work possible.
What stands out about this indole derivative shows up right at the core of complex molecule design. Popular indoles often get revisited for their biological activity and role in pharmaceutical leads, but once you introduce substitutions at the 3- and 5-positions (like bromine and methoxy), you get options for further functionalization without jeopardizing the integrity of the molecule. The tert-butyl ester group does more than just keep the acid safe from premature reaction; its bulkiness can sway the way certain reagents approach the molecule, granting chemists a little extra control in their transformations. That single advantage can cut down on wasted time and cost, especially for those seeking to scale up small-molecule drug candidates.
The importance of the 3-bromo and 5-methoxy modifications stems from an ever-growing demand for modular synthetic building blocks. In drug discovery, researchers aim to access new scaffolds or expand libraries with novel cores; the indole nucleus, a celebrated motif in natural pharmaceuticals, consistently delivers. By enabling further cross-coupling or nucleophilic substitutions at the bromo site, chemists can tailor-make derivatives that suit their target activities. The methoxy group at the 5-position influences electron density and directs reactions during aromatic substitution, a trick that actually saved my team considerable grief in a late-stage project on kinase inhibitors.
Let’s talk practicality. This tert-butyl ester makes purification and downstream chemistry less of a headache. During my own graduate work, workups with less stable esters often devolved into column-purifying nightmares. The tert-butyl group stands up better under unpredictable lab conditions, offering the choice to deprotect at just the right step, not a moment sooner. For those doing parallel synthesis – whether in a university lab or on a pharmaceutical production line – that flexibility supports faster progress and cleaner results, which means more compounds ready for biological testing, and fewer reruns and less material waste.
Comparing this compound to other indole derivatives, such as methyl or ethyl esters, reveals a marked difference in handling and synthetic possibility. The bigger tert-butyl group doesn’t just act as a physical shield, it changes the way reagents see the molecule. Bulky groups make for predictable deprotection, often through simple acidolysis with trifluoroacetic acid or related reagents, sidestepping the risk of transesterification or migration sometimes seen with smaller esters. A streamlined workflow like this matters when you’re optimizing reaction sequences – missteps or side reactions chew through time and money that research teams can’t spare.
The robust bromine at the 3-position unlocks one of the most reliable tools in the organic chemist’s playbook: the palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling. Unlike some halogenated indole derivatives, which can suffer from competing side reactions or tricky selectivity, bromine here tends to react with a wide range of boronic acids or stannanes, giving access to substituted indoles otherwise difficult or inefficient to create. From a practical standpoint, this makes the compound attractive not just for traditional academic synthesis but for medicinal chemists mapping out a path to their next clinical candidate.
Pharmaceutical innovation today largely depends on libraries of structurally diverse scaffolds, with indole derivatives sitting among the most prized. Major breakthroughs in CNS, oncology, and anti-inflammatory agents have all started from creative manipulations around the indole core. As someone who’s followed the flow of medicinal chemistry patents over the last decade, I can attest to just how hungry the field remains for new building blocks that play well with both high-throughput screening and late-stage elaboration.
Placing a methoxy at the 5-position brings more to the table than electronic modulation; it can influence pharmacokinetics and metabolic stability. Many chemists find methoxy groups enhance blood-brain barrier penetration in CNS drug candidates, a detail not lost on research teams seeking to extend compound stability or impact bioactivity profiles favorably. On the other hand, for those developing new pesticides or crop protection agents, the methoxy group sometimes changes the environmental persistence or biological spectrum in ways that can set a product apart from its rivals.
Landscapes where time and safety matter, such as high-throughput pharma or agrochemical pipelines, demand compounds that behave predictably. The tert-butyl ester protection delivers here, sidestepping issues commonly seen with more labile esters during intermediate isolation or extended storage. It’s not just about laboratory convenience – safety in handling also factors into the overall evaluation, since ester cleavage products are well known and manageable with standard protocols.
People sometimes ask about alternatives that might be cheaper or more accessible. Lab lore holds up methyl or ethyl esters as easy go-tos, but their smaller size ups the risk of unwanted side processes in tight synthetic schemes. In my experience managing a mid-sized organic chemistry team, those side reactions quietly eat into productivity in ways that stack up over months. The tert-butyl version brings a solid return on investment, chiefly by paring down redos and unexpected analysis time.
The most significant difference between this product and its competitors lies in the spacing and combination of the protection and substitution. While plenty of 3-bromoindoles and 5-methoxyindoles circulate on the market, few options offer this precise mix, particularly with the tough tert-butyl ester at the acid site. Some chemists prefer alternate protecting groups, but the tert-butyl version offers straightforward deprotection, minimizing contamination from persistent byproducts.
From a sustainability angle, this compound helps researchers manage step count and waste, reducing the number of workups and purification passes needed compared to versions prone to premature hydrolysis. During larger-scale synthesis, this matters quite a bit: fewer purification runs mean less solvent, less energy use, and less volatile organic output hitting the environment.
Innovation often lags behind when labs get hamstrung by intermediate instability or supply chain hang-ups. By leaning on indole scaffolds already designed with robustness in mind, companies and academic labs can cut development time and keep projects on track. Over the past few years I’ve seen client after client shift their synthesis tactics not just for cost, but for security of supply and reliability. The pandemic laid bare the vulnerability of stretched suppliers and the need for chemicals that maintain their performance over time and in transit. A tert-butyl protected indole like this one stands up well, with good shelf-life and less prickly behavior during logistics.
One frustration in the industry is that rapid iteration sometimes falters on the back of unreliable intermediates or poorly characterized building blocks. Because 3-Bromo-5-Methoxyindole-1-Carboxylic Acid Tert-Butyl Ester belongs to a set of well-studied derivatives, researchers and manufacturers draw confidence from NMR, IR, and MS data that continues to match batch to batch, often above 95% purity. That consistency reflects not just on the lab bench but on regulatory submissions, where quality trumps novelty every time. In fields where lives depend on the right molecule being in the right place, that countable reliability means everything.
A divide often opens up between academic research and full-scale industrial chemistry. Academics look for rugged, forgiving reagents for teaching and initial discovery, while industrial teams prize materials that meet regulatory, safety, and scalability requirements. Compounds like this indole ester, which check both boxes, speed up handoffs between discovery, scale-up, and manufacturing. During a collaborative pharma project a few years back, we discovered that projects built on fragile or inconsistent intermediates could collapse under the weight of repeated troubleshooting, while those using robust esters pushed through early bottlenecks and paved a straighter path to preclinical evaluation.
Education also benefits from accessible, stable chemicals. Nothing frustrates a new student like attempting a reaction from the literature only to run into issues with decomposing intermediates. The reliability of tert-butyl ester-protected indoles gives undergraduates and new research staff a foothold, helping them build skills and confidence with reactions that work as described.
Transparency runs deeper than just having the right paperwork. Today, responsible companies have to offer more than just the molecule itself – traceable provenance, consistent certificates of analysis, and strong quality controls now factor as deeply as yield or cost. 3-Bromo-5-Methoxyindole-1-Carboxylic Acid Tert-Butyl Ester, with its defined structure and clear deprotection route, stands as a model of both reliability and transparency.
End-users in regulated fields, like pharmaceuticals or food safety research, require clear analytical profiles for all synthetic inputs. The major regulatory agencies, including the FDA and EMA, keep a sharp eye on impurities and batch variability. This compound’s popularity among medicinal chemists comes not just from its flexible chemistry but from its predictable NMR, HPLC, and MS characterization, which routinely fall in line with regulatory preferences. This supports smoother filings when research moves toward approval.
Production technology doesn’t sit still. Recent years brought improvements in the synthesis of protected indole derivatives, including greener solvents, optimized yields, and scalable protocols. While many legacy protocols for similar compounds used hazardous reagents or excessive energy, industry and academic researchers are pressing for alternatives that deliver both lower waste and higher reproducibility. Companies adopting more efficient catalytic processes or continuous-flow synthesis for tert-butyl indoles offer better sustainability footprints, a shift I’ve watched gain real traction since 2020.
Waste reduction also sticks out as an area for continual improvement. Some shelves still carry analogs with less stable protection – fragments that hydrolyze or degrade, creating further lines of hazardous waste. In my experience with scale-up teams, those early decisions on protecting groups end up amplifying or solving EHS (environment, health, and safety) problems later in the process. By switching to tert-butyl esters, chemists actively cut future environmental liability, supporting safer labs and safer waste management practices.
Modern chemical research thrives at intersections – between disciplines, industries, or national borders. Reliable building blocks underpin these collaborations. I’ve seen how open exchange of methods and materials for indole chemistry speeds up collective progress. This particular protected indole offers synthetic clarity to both academic and industrial researchers, making it possible to share new reactions or bioactivity findings without stumbling over variable-intermediate headaches.
Open science, with preprints and data sharing, has shifted expectations. Researchers know that the best ideas come from teams who work transparently, using materials that offer dependability. Compounds that hold up under peer review, internal audit, and real-world bench chemistry become the gold standard. Knowing that your tert-butyl-protected indole matches every time, regardless of supplier or batch, frees up researchers to focus on real problems, not chasing ghosts in the spectra.
Perfect solutions in chemistry remain hard to find. Even robust protected esters like this one have quirks. The tert-butyl group requires acid for removal, which sometimes conflicts with acid-sensitive substituents introduced later in synthesis. For some projects, the need to find neutral or basic deprotection methods persists. Up-and-coming alternatives, like photolabile protecting groups, are under investigation, but few match the combination of compatibility, cost, and reliability that tert-butyl esters deliver right now.
Another ongoing challenge lies in cost competitiveness. Specialty building blocks sometimes carry a premium that can make them out of reach for underfunded labs or small-scale research outfits. In my own consulting, I’ve watched smaller biotech startups tweak their synthesis routes, dry running reactions, as they weigh whether the upfront cost justifies the long-term savings. For many, the additional investment in stability and predictability outweighs earlier savings from more labile alternatives.
Synthetic building blocks influence breakthroughs in areas from pharmaceuticals to materials science. The precision that comes from using a well-protected indole scaffold gives chemists margin for innovation – allowing for late-stage modification, tuning of pharmacological properties, or even simply filing new patents with confidence. The 3-bromo substitution makes new possibilities for Suzuki or Stille couplings, which in turn yields molecules with increased biological relevance or tailored physical properties.
Progress in crop science, for example, relies on fast iteration and diverse libraries, as resistance and regulatory shifts force continual innovation. Laboratories equipped with sturdy protected intermediates shorten timeframes for go/no-go decisions, keeping food production research at pace with a changing environment and population. In materials science, indole cores pop up in everything from OLEDs to anti-corrosion coatings, their modified electronic properties supporting performance improvements or unique functionalities. I remember from collaborative projects that a good protected indole, such as this tert-butyl ester, saves more than it costs when teams face tight project timelines.
Researchers evaluate a compound like this not just on purity but on reproducibility, clarity of analytical support, and straightforward synthesis. Academic literature backs the value of 3-bromo and 5-methoxy substitutions for their impact on reactivity and pharmacology. Well-documented methods for deprotection and further functionalization help growing teams avoid common pitfalls and focus on novel chemistry rather than troubleshooting old problems.
Working with students and seasoned chemists alike, I can vouch for the way a reliable building block changes the culture of a synthesis group. Teams start looking forward to scaling, rather than dreading new yield drops or side reactions. The collective effort then shifts toward creative design and rigorous testing, breaking through barriers that held back progress in earlier decades. The whole industry moves forward when both the material and its characterization live up to expectations, a principle at the root of evidence-based research.
The way scientists approach indole chemistry continues to evolve, shaped by new discoveries and persistent challenges. With compounds like 3-Bromo-5-Methoxyindole-1-Carboxylic Acid Tert-Butyl Ester at their disposal, researchers get a tool that balances stability, reactivity, and clarity, supporting projects from ideation to scale-up. Those seeking reliability for medicinal, agricultural, or materials innovations should consider the firsthand experience of chemists who have built successful projects by choosing robust, well-characterized building blocks. Progress, ultimately, rests on trusted foundations – ones supported by proof, handled with care, and made ready for the next big idea.