|
HS Code |
693731 |
| Product Name | 3-Bromo-4-Iodobenzonitrile |
| Cas Number | 158063-81-1 |
| Molecular Formula | C7H3BrIN |
| Molecular Weight | 323.92 g/mol |
| Appearance | Light yellow to brown powder |
| Melting Point | 95-99°C |
| Purity | Typically ≥98% |
| Solubility | Slightly soluble in organic solvents (e.g., DMSO, DMF) |
| Smiles | C1=CC(=C(C=C1Br)I)C#N |
| Inchi | InChI=1S/C7H3BrIN/c8-6-1-2-7(9)5(3-6)4-10 |
As an accredited 3-Bromo-4-Iodobenzonitrile factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | |
| Shipping | |
| Storage |
Competitive 3-Bromo-4-Iodobenzonitrile prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to admin@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: admin@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
I’ve spent enough time working with specialty chemicals to recognize the difference a strategic building block brings to advanced synthesis. One compound that often stands out in organic labs and R&D centers is 3-Bromo-4-Iodobenzonitrile. Not everyone needs to know every detail about lab reagents, but anyone who’s tried to build complex molecules understands how much easier life gets with the right intermediate.
Chemists face hurdles at every step. Regioselective substitutions can give headaches, especially when searching for a stable aromatic ring system that can accommodate a variety of transformations. This is where 3-Bromo-4-Iodobenzonitrile enters the picture. With a nitrile group stabilizing the benzene ring and halogens positioned for selective activation, reaction planning becomes smarter, not harder. There are no wasted steps, no unnecessary protections, just solid, defensible chemistry.
I look for molecules that open new doors. Here, the value starts with the model: a benzene ring that carries both bromine and iodine, precisely at the 3 and 4 positions, with the nitrile group lending a unique push-pull electronic effect. This alignment isn’t just a choice. It gives chemists the upper hand in coupling reactions, especially in Suzuki or Sonogashira protocols, where selectivity and yield mean everything.
You’ll find other halogenated benzonitriles, sure. But 3-Bromo-4-Iodobenzonitrile carves its own path. Bromine and iodine differ in reactivity. Iodine is a gentle giant, easier to displace in palladium-catalyzed couplings, while bromine holds on a bit tighter, resisting unless you want it to move. With both on one ring, methodical stepwise functionalization becomes straightforward, letting you introduce diversity with fewer side products and cleanup headaches.
It’s no exaggeration that advances in pharmaceuticals and electronics ride on the quality of intermediates. The high-purity profile typical of 3-Bromo-4-Iodobenzonitrile isn’t just a checkbox. Every trace impurity dropped from your starting material saves someone downstream from a costly purification later. In pharmaceuticals, this can translate to safer compounds, less environmental waste, and fewer regulatory hurdles. In electronics, it means more precise organic semiconductors with fewer leaks and breakdowns.
Each time I’ve pushed a new project using this compound, the design flexibility always stands out. In medicinal chemistry settings, it sits at an ideal intersection for growing complexity. Medicinal chemists often start with a simple aromatic scaffold, introducing diversity through halogen “handles.” Iodine leaves first in cross-couplings due to its lower C–I bond strength, enabling targeted substitution. Afterward, the bromine can serve as a second position of diversity, letting teams rapidly prototype analogs to tune potency or selectivity.
In advanced materials, controlling reactivity is vital. A benzene core protected by a nitrile group shrugs off many side reactions. Whether the end goal is a colorant, polymer precursor, or a custom organic electronic, you gain the precision that separates good from great.
I care less about brochures and more about what ends up in the flask. For anyone running sensitive reactions, even a trace of wrong-position isomer can throw a spanner in the works. Consistent melting point, clear solubility profile, and spectral fingerprints—these are the marks of a batch that won’t let you down when scaling up. 3-Bromo-4-Iodobenzonitrile supports these standards, often exceeding typical purity benchmarks for lab-grade substances.
Storage and handling hardly become an issue. Thanks to the stability imparted by the nitrile group and halogenation, this compound sits comfortably in a cool, dry spot without worrying about rapid decomposition or air sensitivity. This matters most for researchers with tight budgets or busy schedules; nobody wants an intermediate that goes sour while waiting its turn on the bench.
It’s tempting to chase absolute novelty in chemical design, but there’s real value in reliability. I’ve seen well-planned routes falter because someone chose the flashier, less-proven compound over a workhorse like 3-Bromo-4-Iodobenzonitrile. Reproducibility often hinges on using standards that suppliers can guarantee batch after batch—backed by certificates of analysis and robust quality programs.
New students sometimes ask if they should bother learning about individual reagent quirks. My answer: familiarity saves time and trouble. With 3-Bromo-4-Iodobenzonitrile, typical applications stretch from academic research to major industrial projects. Need to grow a library of analogues for a biological screening program? The dual halogen setup speeds up SAR (structure-activity relationship) programs. A process chemist looking to scale up a candidate molecule? Clean substitution chemistries lower the risk of unwelcome byproducts at kilogram scale.
Specific examples tell the story best. One medicinal chemistry project I joined required an aryl nitrile core—simple enough. Selectivity was key, and so was yield. We trialed off-the-shelf halogenated benzonitriles; only the 3-bromo-4-iodo option could deliver the right coupling sequence. The sequence we deployed took advantage of the easier C–I activation before doing a separate transformation at the bromo site, with minimal protecting group fuss. Time saved on purification and retesting paid off as the project moved to preclinical stages.
Material scientists have different needs. Organic electronic materials push benzonitrile chemistry to its limit, often demanding electronic fine-tuning no other set of substituents can provide. Here, the nitrile group dials in the polarity and electron-withdrawing character, while the two halogens set up further modifications. This customizability underpins the drive for higher-performing OLEDs, more efficient sensors, or tailored photoactive agents.
With so many aromatic nitriles on the market, picking the best candidate makes or breaks a synthetic plan. Some products throw more halogens onto the ring, hoping to unlock reactivity—yet the result is a frustrating mess of side reactions and purification challenges. Others skimp with a single halogen and then run into stubborn limitations. 3-Bromo-4-Iodobenzonitrile walks the line: just enough activation, but not so much as to make the system unmanageable.
A close cousin, 2-bromo-4-iodobenzonitrile, sometimes tempts chemists aiming for ortho effects. Still, I’ve seen the 3,4-oriented version win out more often in real-world couplings, thanks to steric access and the compatible electronics it offers. Products lacking the nitrile group may seem flexible in pure transformations, but miss the stabilization and downstream reactivity that nitrile chemistry unlocks, particularly in medicinal and material-oriented projects. Less stable analogs don’t survive tough conditions or aggressive purification, leading to more work and expense.
Lab life rarely pans out as a neat sequence of steps. Air moisture, batch variability, regulatory shifts—all introduce uncertainty. Products like 3-Bromo-4-Iodobenzonitrile take out some of that uncertainty. Still, there’s room for improvement. Supply chains have to keep up, especially with increased demand for specialty reagents in emerging technology sectors. Batch traceability and environmental impact monitoring get more attention now than ever. A smart solution involves closer coordination between chemical producers, distributors, and the research community.
In my experience, collaborations across supply and demand lines unlock the fullest value of advanced intermediates. Open information on trace impurities, certifications for sustainable sourcing, and honest communication when shortages loom all help research teams plan and adapt. Some groups have started sharing real-world performance data that goes beyond standard specs—publishing not just average yields, but actual process challenges and unusual side reactions encountered in scale-up. The more this attitude catches on, the fewer costly surprises appear in late-stage development.
The story of 3-Bromo-4-Iodobenzonitrile tracks broader shifts in how discovery science merges with applied manufacturing. Thirty years ago, compounds like this would linger as academic curiosities, passed around among a handful of researchers. Now, they show up in patent filings, startup pipelines, and scaled-up pharmaceutical facilities. This reflects more than a shift in availability—it signals new confidence that today’s molecular building blocks can bear the weight of tomorrow’s business plans.
This shift moves discussions away from theoretical benefits and toward documentable value. Instead of “could be useful one day,” users can demonstrate improved pharmacokinetics, more durable electronic properties, and higher-throughput processes. Management isn’t satisfied with incremental improvements—they want to see leaps, and intermediates with robust, flexible profiles allow R&D teams to deliver.
Ten years from now, I expect the line between specialty and commodity chemicals to blur even further. As AI-driven modeling predicts which building blocks offer the highest success odds, reliable dual-halogen intermediates with track records will outshine rarely used options. More teams can enter high-stakes fields, thanks to widely available, proven reagents. This breeds direct economic value, strengthens the entire supply ecosystem, and pushes progress further for everyone.
There’s pressure in research settings to cut costs without sacrificing standards. The seasoned users I know pay close attention to consistency over time, not just a single shining batch. It pays to keep tabs on a supplier’s integrity: Do they update their certificates of analysis? Do they provide analytical data that lines up with published literature and peer lab benchmarks? With ever-rising regulatory scrutiny—both for lab use and for downstream environmental controls—chemists now value transparency and documentation as much as the initial molecule itself.
I’ve learned that minor shifts in impurity profiles matter at commercial scale. Even trace metals from cross-coupling catalysts, or unreacted halogen sources, can raise flags with global regulators. The best suppliers openly share detection levels, not just reassurance. When you see a company improving documentation because a client pointed out a trace contaminant, you remember who’s diligent and who’s running on autopilot.
What sometimes slips through the cracks in debate about specialty chemicals is how a research reagent travels the globe. It’s a collective effort, from the original synthetic route to environmental checks and the logistics crossing borders. Each link in the chain influences the final product’s reliability, price, and timeliness. Researchers pressing for traceable, environmentally conscious sourcing help shape a cleaner, safer future—one bottle at a time.
Growing attention now focuses on greener routes, seeking alternatives to old-school halogenation that once poured pollutants into rivers. Modern suppliers answer with data, cleaner solvents, and lower-waste processes, even when margins get tight. A collaborative stance—where researchers reward transparency and improvement—leads to more innovative, sustainable labs around the world.
After years navigating the uncertainties of organic synthesis, I’ve learned to spot which intermediates actually move the needle. 3-Bromo-4-Iodobenzonitrile might not be glamorous or headline-grabbing, but it stands as a rare example of where small changes in molecule design ripple outward toward real gains in research, throughput, and finished product.
For any chemist, material scientist, or manufacturer hoping to build a pipeline that can handle tight deadlines and shifting technical demands, a reliable intermediate sets the foundation. It’s not the flashiest part of a success story, but more often than not, it’s the missing link that speeds discovery instead of slowing it down.