|
HS Code |
995566 |
| Chemicalname | 3-Bromo-4-Ethoxybenzaldehyde |
| Molecularformula | C9H9BrO2 |
| Molecularweight | 229.07 g/mol |
| Casnumber | 130117-06-3 |
| Appearance | White to off-white solid |
| Meltingpoint | 56-60°C |
| Purity | Typically ≥98% |
| Solubility | Soluble in organic solvents like DMSO and ethanol |
| Smiles | CCOC1=CC(=CC(=C1)Br)C=O |
| Inchi | InChI=1S/C9H9BrO2/c1-2-12-9-4-7(6-11)3-8(10)5-9/h3-6H,2H2,1H3 |
As an accredited 3-Bromo-4-Ethoxybenzaldehyde factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | |
| Shipping | |
| Storage |
Competitive 3-Bromo-4-Ethoxybenzaldehyde prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to admin@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: admin@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
In the world of organic synthesis, few compounds quietly punch above their weight quite like 3-Bromo-4-Ethoxybenzaldehyde. Known by the chemical formula C9H9BrO2 and a CAS number that identifies its unique footprint, this aromatic aldehyde finds steady use in research labs, fine chemical development, and the pharmaceutical industry.
Every scientist appreciates a reagent that behaves predictably. With a melting point typically in the low hundreds (Celsius) and a moderate molecular weight, this compound delivers manageable handling and reliable purity, displaying a crystalline form that signals a true fine chemical. Its bromine and ethoxy functional groups place it in a select tier, forming a versatile platform for introducing complexity into aromatic rings. Anyone who has tried building out a benzene backbone using lesser intermediates will know how useful such a structure can be. It spares you some tedious steps in multi-stage syntheses. I’ve seen colleagues gain weeks on their projects by slotting this compound into early building blocks, giving themselves room to focus on more delicate downstream chemistry.
It’s not always obvious why one intermediate should be favored over another. Yet, for many practitioners, the difference becomes sharp after just a few bench-scale reactions. For example, the ethoxy substitution at the para position not only modulates reactivity but also affects the compound’s physical properties. 3-Bromo-4-Ethoxybenzaldehyde dissolves without drama in common organic solvents like dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, and THF, letting chemists maintain smooth operations without frustrating solubility surprises. Compare this to the less forgiving behavior of unsubstituted or nitro-substituted analogues, and you’ll quickly discover why more seasoned hands reach for this bottle first.
Having worked as both a bench chemist and a project manager on scale-up teams, I’ve found that picking the right aldehyde intermediate often makes or breaks a synthesis campaign. Time lost to purification, low yields, or unexpected side products translates straight into wasted resources and frayed timelines. The precision with which 3-Bromo-4-Ethoxybenzaldehyde undergoes condensation and coupling reactions—be it in traditional nucleophilic aromatic substitution or more modern palladium-catalyzed methods—helps researchers attain stronger yields, less waste, and fewer headaches.
This substance also holds a unique edge because of its bromine substituent. Bromine on an aromatic ring serves as a flexible functional handle for metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions. Whether you’re building biaryls via Suzuki–Miyaura, going after vinylation in Heck-type couplings, or seeking cyanation, a para-ethoxy bromobenzaldehyde lets you build new bonds with remarkable selectivity. The aldehyde group, meanwhile, provides a ready anchor for further anchoring transformations like condensation with amines or hydrazines, feeding directly into libraries of complex heterocyclic molecules. In my view, this flexibility separates a truly valuable intermediate from one that just fills a catalog.
Some may ask: “Why not just use 3-bromobenzaldehyde or a plain 4-ethoxybenzaldehyde?” This comes down to the added value of the dual substitution. The bromine atom at position three adds a gateway for precision modification—something both medicinal and process chemists crave. Meanwhile, the ethoxy group at position four tunes the electron density around the ring, not just shifting reactivity but also aiding in certain selectivities. These details stack up, sometimes saving months at commercial scale.
I remember a project where the task was to generate library compounds for kinase inhibition screening. Choosing 3-Bromo-4-Ethoxybenzaldehyde as a starting material allowed the team to introduce new aromatic diversity through coupling, without pulling in unwanted ortho/para products or sticking to laborious protection–deprotection regimens. In downstream medicinal chemistry, having an ethoxy tail at the para position improved the pharmacokinetic profiles of some candidates, giving medicinal chemists more options in molecular design. Over thousands of analogues, the efficiency gains were unmistakable; the difference rippled all the way through downstream testing and scale-up.
Those who work at larger scales—say, pilot-plant or kilo-lab batches—notice these differences even more. Reaction efficiencies get magnified, and the cleanliness of transformations becomes critical to avoiding costly purification or waste disposal steps. The relatively predictable behavior of 3-Bromo-4-Ethoxybenzaldehyde makes it a backbone choice for consistently yielding structurally complex molecules, especially in crowded synthetic pipelines. This isn’t about catalog marketing. It’s about real projects, real deadlines, and making progress you can trust.
Reliable quality matters as much as the chemistry. Having spent years verifying and validating fine chemicals, I know that impurities—whether residual solvents or unreacted starting materials—can derail a whole sequence. Today’s synthetic labs operate under rigorous quality expectations, relying on high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) to guarantee purity. Trusted suppliers now routinely provide materials with assay values above 98%, with detailed spectra confirming identity. My best results have come from batches where the manufacturer provided full traceability, including lot numbers and certificates of analysis. This transparency underpins trust between supplier and scientist.
It pays to verify consistency across batches. Deadlines benefit from tighter reproducibility. As research intensifies and regulations around chemical traceability tighten, choosing intermediates like 3-Bromo-4-Ethoxybenzaldehyde from reputable suppliers reduces risk. I’ve seen projects delayed weeks by poorly characterized batches from generic vendors; even small impurity levels can trigger false positives or unexpected biology in screening assays. Researchers and quality leaders alike have learned to demand solid documentation, along with responsive customer support if questions emerge.
Few synthetic plans go off without a hitch, especially as molecular targets get more complex and patent claims tighter. By placing 3-Bromo-4-Ethoxybenzaldehyde into key early-stage routes, research teams lock in greater flexibility for late-stage diversification—a key value when fighting patent cliffs and competition. It’s not just about reaction yields; these choices play out in project speed and even patent strategy.
Take the building of libraries for high-throughput screening. Instead of recycling tired old scaffolds, chemists can open access to unique structures by starting from this compound. The bromine substituent gives a ‘handle’ for coupling, essentially opening the door to biaryls, vinylarenes, aryl ethers, and more. Meanwhile, the ethoxy group at para steers both reactivity and solubility, offering distinct behavior over plain methoxy or even hydrogen.
I’ve watched medicinal chemists design new analogues to test binding at enzyme sites, where small changes in substitution patterns shift the whole picture. Having a diverse aldehyde library means unlocking not just new molecules but new intellectual property. The same goes for agrochemical and material science innovation, where niche structures can turn into novel herbicides, advanced polymers, or smart dyes.
Modern synthetic labs rely on cross-coupling chemistry for a reason: it works, and with the right functional groups, it delivers clean outcomes. The bromine in 3-Bromo-4-Ethoxybenzaldehyde reacts efficiently with palladium catalysts, supporting high-yield Suzuki, Heck, and even Buchwald–Hartwig transformations. In a world where every day and every reaction counts, cutting down on unnecessary steps means getting from concept to candidate faster.
Older intermediates often forced chemists to install needed functionality through multistep (and sometimes hazardous) processes. Using something like 3-Bromo-4-Ethoxybenzaldehyde sidesteps a lot of that pain. Its fused electron-donating ethoxy group and a reactive bromine atom lend themselves to regioselective coupling, helping teams focus on productive chemistry instead of lengthy purification and recycling protocols.
From a practical angle, I’ve also appreciated this molecule’s behavior under tough conditions. It tolerates mild base as well as standard organic acids, letting teams push past bottlenecks in route scouting. Secure packaging prevents loss of activity, and reliable suppliers use materials certified to industry standards, supporting even GMP-grade development.
With any fine chemical, safe and responsible use forms the bedrock of a well-run lab. 3-Bromo-4-Ethoxybenzaldehyde, like its peers, should be handled with gloves, goggles, and in well-ventilated spaces. It responds well to ordinary fume hoods and containment setups. Data shows low acute toxicity in standard animal models, but as with all aromatic aldehydes, respiratory and skin exposure are best minimized. Having familiarized countless students and young chemists with these protocols, I’ve watched them work confidently and safely using routine lab gear.
Disposal, increasingly a regulatory focus, also finds support here. The stability and clear breakdown pathways of this compound make waste management more straightforward than for more exotic halogenated or polycyclic aromatics. Most facilities already have setups for aromatic aldehyde and brominated waste, and qualified suppliers back up their shipments with handling and disposal guidance that alleviates compliance headaches. Those looking for greener methods can engage vendors offering return-and-recycle programs that help reduce landfill contributions.
What really separates this product from so many on the shelf isn’t just the chemistry. It’s the track record in real labs, the months saved by avoiding dead-end routes, and the improved selectivity in both small-scale and bulk transformations. The unique combination of reactivity, manageability, and versatility points to broader trends in modern synthesis. Today’s chemists face crowded patent landscapes, growing regulatory scrutiny, and relentless competitive pressure. They need every edge they can find—not just another reagent, but something that cuts down on troubleshooting and extends the reach of their imagination.
The purity, traceability, and compatibility with modern methods attract both academic groups and industrial chemists. Over the years, I’ve heard colleagues at conferences and in team meetings talk about the subtle perks of using 3-Bromo-4-Ethoxybenzaldehyde. Some mention smoother reactions, others cite easier work-ups or clearer analytical traces. Across the board, the shared experience points to greater efficiency and fewer unpleasant surprises.
Not every project requires such a specialized intermediate, but in critical research environments or production scenarios, it fast becomes the go-to choice. Ease of use, flexibility in downstream chemistry, and confidence in the supply chain add up to strong value, especially when budgets face closer scrutiny and regulatory demands tighten.
For project managers and procurement specialists, the choice now goes beyond simple catalog pricing. The best suppliers keep open lines of communication, pledge consistency, and invest in technical support. These relationships grew more important as health and supply crises disrupted global logistics in recent years. I’ve watched forward-thinking vendors invest in redundant supply, better storage, and timely documentation, responding to customer questions with practical advice and chemical know-how.
Procurement based on performance—assay, reproducibility, analytical consistency—builds relationships that outlast a project or product line. Trusted suppliers also inform buyers about shifts in raw material costs, changes in regulatory environments, and batch availability, which lets researchers better plan their timelines. This is especially important for rare or high-value intermediates that might face global bottlenecks.
I’ve benefited from working with teams who maintained strong supplier relationships, helping bridge gaps in both technical knowledge and logistical support. The outcome: fewer emergency switches, fewer last-minute project panics, and better long-term returns on R&D investment. By investing in quality intermediates and reliable supply, labs future-proof critical synthetic routes against project risk and market uncertainties.
People with hands-on experience learn to judge chemicals not just by data sheets but by how they perform when things get tough. The trustworthy behavior of 3-Bromo-4-Ethoxybenzaldehyde across a range of solvents, temperatures, and reaction conditions isn’t just marketing—it’s a product of its rational design and fine-tuned manufacturing. When you’re racing against a product launch or patent expiration, little things like batch-to-batch consistency make all the difference. Synthetic teams relying on robust intermediates achieve stronger project delivery—something every PI and project sponsor appreciates.
You learn a product’s real value by how often your team returns to it. In my own work, the steady utility of high-purity aromatic aldehydes like this one puts them in a core toolkit. Labs looking for tough, high-performing intermediates will find this one stands up under the stress of real science, not just catalog descriptions.
In discovery settings, the stakes for innovation keep rising. Molecular complexity, regulatory requirements, and cost pressures intertwine, placing pressure on every choice in the synthetic sequence. Taking strategic advantage of smart, high-value intermediates becomes a lever for future breakthroughs. 3-Bromo-4-Ethoxybenzaldehyde embodies this shift: flexible enough for a wide sweep of transformations, robust enough for scale-up, and trusted for purity and analytical clarity.
As industry standards move toward greater documentation and sustainability, intermediates that provide both transparency and performance will lead the shift. Labs adopting responsible sourcing and greener waste programs can partner with suppliers who deliver stability and engage in reducing environmental impact, without compromising on downstream chemistry. Every efficient transformation counts—conserving resources, compressing development timelines, and enabling more ambitious molecular targets.
Over the next few years, we will probably see this intermediate (and others like it) play larger roles in AI-guided molecule design, automated synthesis platforms, and even new material discovery. The track record built today will support innovations that reach beyond the bench, delivering fresh solutions in medicine, materials, and sustainable technology.
What matters in fine chemistry is not just the spec sheet, but real-world advantage: fewer barriers, better reliability, and freedom in molecular design. 3-Bromo-4-Ethoxybenzaldehyde answers this by providing a tested mix of flexibility, tractability, and performance. From grant-driven academic research through high-throughput pharmaceutical discovery, experience shows it delivers results that move projects forward. With synthetic demands mounting, deadlines tightening, and regulatory scrutiny growing, chemicals that build in reliability—not just convenience—will stay at the center of progress.
As someone who has followed both the victories and setbacks of modern chemical synthesis, I see broad potential in this intermediate for chemists ready to look past the ordinary. Whether exploring new reaction spaces, scaling up a candidate, or responding to tomorrow’s supply disruptions, choosing wisely—and building smart relationships with suppliers—stays the surest route to discovery.