|
HS Code |
103758 |
| Chemical Name | 2-(4-Bromophenyl)piperazine |
| Cas Number | 64887-16-7 |
| Molecular Formula | C10H13BrN2 |
| Molecular Weight | 241.13 |
| Appearance | White to off-white solid |
| Melting Point | 128-130°C |
| Solubility | Soluble in DMSO and methanol |
| Synonyms | 1-(4-Bromophenyl)piperazine |
| Smiles | N1CCN(CC1)C2=CC=C(C=C2)Br |
| Purity | Typically >98% |
| Storage Temperature | Store at 2-8°C |
| Hazard Statements | H315, H319, H335 |
As an accredited 2-(4-Bromophenyl)Piperazine factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | |
| Shipping | |
| Storage |
Competitive 2-(4-Bromophenyl)Piperazine prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to admin@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: admin@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
In a world where lab-synthesized chemicals play a vital role in research and innovation, 2-(4-Bromophenyl)Piperazine stands as one of the primary building blocks within organic synthesis. Anyone stepping into medicinal chemistry or pharmaceutical research has probably come across this compound at some point. Its structure, a union of piperazine and a brominated phenyl ring, encourages a broad range of downstream applications, mainly because the wiring between these two rings offers a versatile platform for further modifications.
The chemical structure of 2-(4-Bromophenyl)Piperazine, which merges a six-membered piperazine ring with a 4-bromophenyl group, shapes its physical and chemical properties. Its molecular formula, C10H13BrN2, marks it as a relatively small molecule, yet it packs plenty of punch because of that bromine atom. Both chemists and pharmacists appreciate the stability this halogen imparts on the main ring, affecting pharmacokinetics and reactivity in reactions downstream.
2-(4-Bromophenyl)Piperazine usually appears as a white or off-white crystalline powder. Its purity typically hits the high nineties percentile, as lower grades can hamper further reactions or give inconsistent assay results. In hands-on work, consistency matters. Impurities, even at a fraction of a percent, can throw off experiments by introducing noise in data or unwanted side-reactions. Sourcing this compound from a reputable supplier, with analytical certificates that list HPLC purity, melting point, and residue content, becomes a practical need rather than a luxury, especially in labs where accuracy matters more than anywhere else.
On the technical side, storage conditions can often affect stability, particularly if the product spends time on the shelf before use. Moisture and sunlight degrade aromatic amines and piperazine derivatives, so closed, amber glass containers in a dry space preserve integrity and prevent breakdown. Over my years of working with such compounds, I learned that deviation from clear storage protocols is the quickest route to poor results and reordering when a project is at a critical stage.
Many of today’s experimental medicines and advanced materials begin with modest-looking compounds like this one. The bromophenyl group acts as a handle for a range of chemical reactions — Suzuki and Heck couplings being the most prominent. These methods allow scientists to quickly tack on different fragments and map out structure-activity relationships in drug development. Every time a researcher asks, “What happens if we swap this group with that?” the odds are good they lean on intermediates like 2-(4-Bromophenyl)Piperazine.
I’ve seen first-hand the leap in productivity these building blocks offer in combinatorial chemistry. Automated synthesis machines churn out hundreds of analogs in rapid succession, each slightly tweaked from the last, many involving a piperazine core. A well-prepared batch of this compound saves weeks of sorting and testing, since quality issues at this step ripple through a whole research cycle.
Therapeutic research leans on 2-(4-Bromophenyl)Piperazine for targeting neurological receptors, because the ring system mimics structures known to interact with the central nervous system. Synthetic chemists fashion it into candidate drugs for depression, anxiety, and related disorders, or use it to unlock new structural classes with possible antibacterial or antiviral properties. While the compound itself isn’t marketed as a medicine, its value springs from how easily it’s repurposed during the discovery phase.
I remember once watching a development program stumble, only to rebound after switching to a higher grade of 2-(4-Bromophenyl)Piperazine. Researchers found that subtle impurities present in lesser batches caused inconsistent biological readouts. This reinforced a lesson across the industry: quality and reliability of core reagents are non-negotiable, since every missed or ambiguous experiment wastes not only money but also the talent and time of those working behind the bench.
Plenty of piperazine derivatives line the shelves of chemical supply catalogs. The inclusion of a bromine at the para-position on the phenyl ring distinguishes this compound in key ways. Bromine provides a handle for further functionalization, especially in transition-metal catalyzed reactions, where leaving groups like bromine are essential. This makes the compound much more versatile in drug development pipelines compared to unsubstituted piperazines or even those carrying chlorine or fluorine — each halogen alters downstream reactions distinctly, but the size and reactivity of bromine strikes a practical balance for making new analogs without unwanted side-products or difficult purification steps.
Compared with 2-(4-Chlorophenyl)Piperazine, the bromo variant generally reacts more smoothly in palladium-catalyzed cross-couplings. I’ve found yields to tick up noticeably, with cleaner crude products after workups. These gains in efficiency, though they look trivial on paper, shift the economics of a project, especially one running on a tight deadline.
Some researchers ask if it matters whether they use the bromo or iodo versions, since both are reactive in similar types of chemistry. In practice, iodine-based intermediates tend to be less stable and often more expensive, while bromine’s reactivity lands in the “just right” range — active enough for easy transformations but resistant enough to give predictable storage times and shelf-lives.
A further edge lies in the piperazine framework itself, which provides two basic nitrogen atoms. This dual-amine system opens the door to more functionalization, lets chemists attach tags or reporter groups easily, and interacts well with biological systems in both solution and solid-phase applications. Each step toward greater customizability lets teams tailor their chemical libraries to address niche therapeutic targets or probing previously unexplored biological space.
Whenever a chemical gains popularity, it’s worth noting both the bright and the shadowed sides of its influence. In the case of 2-(4-Bromophenyl)Piperazine, legitimate research and manufacturing drive most interest, but occasional bad actors have sought its use outside the law, as a stepping stone toward controlled psychoactive substances. Responsible laboratories closely track its procurement, use, and disposal, adhering to compliance standards resulting from regulatory oversight in both supply chain and waste streams.
Having worked in labs that keep detailed chemical inventories, I can say that strong tracking and transparent reporting reduce incidents of misuse or accidental misplacement. Barcode systems, dual-reporting, and locked cabinets aren’t about tying up procedures in red tape — they’re about ensuring that chemicals only ever serve the causes of discovery, healing, and innovation. This careful stewardship reassures those outside the field, who might understandably worry about how research-grade chemicals could end up in unauthorized hands.
The real challenge emerges not from the chemistry itself, but from policies that too bluntly equate research reagents with finished drugs. Practical compliance supports innovation by setting reasonable thresholds, simplifying import and storage for reputable scientists, even as it puts up checks and balances for those who might seek shortcuts or untraceable pathways.
Some countries now require end-user statements or track orders above certain gram limits. I have filled out my share of paperwork and online declarations, but the alternative — uncertainty about the destination and use of powerful intermediates — risks far greater consequences. Most researchers I know accept these checks as a fair price for safer, more responsible progress.
The full promise of 2-(4-Bromophenyl)Piperazine gets realized in how it drives efficiency, adaptability, and creativity in chemical synthesis. At a time when both time and resources feel squeezed, any shortcut to higher yield and greater reliability earns attention. Reviewing the recent crop of publications, its fingerprints stretch across drug discovery, materials chemistry, and even agrochemical prototyping.
Some teams focus on linking piperazine derivatives to natural product frameworks, hoping to boost bioavailability or add new modes of action. The compound’s easy participation in N-alkylation, acylation, or even click chemistry means it often becomes the starting point for constructing whole chemical libraries. Many of today’s top hits in early-phase trials trace their roots to small, versatile fragments brought to life through these efficient synthetic routes.
Over years working at the bench, I’ve seen projects soar on the back of clear, reproducible access to consistent starting materials. Each reliable batch of 2-(4-Bromophenyl)Piperazine lets a project skip troubleshooting and get straight to collecting meaningful data. When delays or problems do arise, they frequently stem from skipping essential checks or compromising on quality when a seemingly identical, but subtly flawed, substitute sneaks into the workflow.
Some call this compound an “old reliable,” but it doesn’t stand still. Advanced variations now exist, with deuterated or isotopically-labelled analogs for studying metabolic fate in preclinical models. These tweaks allow pharmacologists to map how small changes in structure — and thus in metabolism — influence safety or efficacy profiles. The underlying science, the backbone structure, stays the same, only adapting to deliver more insights in shorter timespans.
No one learns good procurement from a textbook. Careful sourcing, built up through experience and a few hard-won lessons, proves essential. One batch can look like another on paper, but sources that cut corners on drying, packing, or documentation fail researchers in the field. I remember a time a team gambled on a new supplier, lured by a better listed price. The savings evaporated after wasted assays, lost samples, and weeks waiting for a re-order from a tested, reputable partner. Trust in suppliers, built over years of collaboration and open communication, beats flashy websites and low sticker prices every time.
Researchers watch for reliable certification, consistent package sizes that match forecasting, and support staff who answer questions about impurities or transit damage without dodging the topic. Quality tends to cost more, yet the extra investment more than pays off with smooth work and dependable results. Teams on tight budgets can minimize costs by pooling demand, splitting lots, or negotiating long-term supply agreements, but compromising on grade or documentation rarely ends well.
Every real advance in lab work starts with smart choices in supplies, record-keeping, and planning. These nuts-and-bolts elements rarely make headlines, but they enable the experiments — and, ultimately, the inventions — that shape our health, our security, and our understanding of the world.
Compounds like 2-(4-Bromophenyl)Piperazine occupy a critical place in the toolkit of anyone working in discovery or development chemistry today. Each new finding or application owes much to the groundwork laid by generations of researchers fine-tuning the tools, methods, and supply chains. For every big announcement about a new therapy or technology, hundreds of quiet victories happen far upstream, tucked away in assay plates, reaction flasks, and storage rooms organized by skilled hands.
Looking ahead, opportunities to improve sourcing, safety, and sustainability remain. Green chemistry principles now guide solvent choice, energy use, and disposal even for “routine” intermediates like this one. Process engineers continue to reduce the environmental footprint by refining reaction conditions, cutting waste, and designing safer processes from the outset. Sourcing locally, whenever practical, slashes transit emissions and supports regional supply networks — a lesson made stark by recent global disruptions.
In the end, the story of 2-(4-Bromophenyl)Piperazine and compounds like it follows the same arc as the broader field of science: steady, careful progress born of curiosity, experience, and a willingness to learn from each trial. Working with these molecules does not just build a career; it contributes, step by step, to the greater good — a healthier society, a cleaner planet, and communities empowered by safe, transparent, and ethical science.