|
HS Code |
436354 |
| Chemical Name | 1,1,2,2-Tetrabromoethane |
| Molecular Formula | C2H2Br4 |
| Molar Mass | 377.65 g/mol |
| Appearance | Colorless to pale yellow liquid |
| Density | 2.967 g/cm³ |
| Melting Point | 36 °C |
| Boiling Point | 180 °C |
| Solubility In Water | Very low |
| Refractive Index | 1.668 |
| Cas Number | 79-27-6 |
| Flash Point | None (non-flammable) |
| Vapor Pressure | 0.13 mmHg at 25 °C |
As an accredited 1,1,2,2-Tetrabromoethane factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | A 500 mL amber glass bottle with a secure screw cap, labeled "1,1,2,2-Tetrabromoethane, CAS 79-27-6, hazardous chemical." |
| Shipping | 1,1,2,2-Tetrabromoethane is shipped in tightly sealed, chemical-resistant containers such as drums or bottles, clearly labeled with hazard warnings. It is classified as a hazardous material and must be transported according to international regulations (e.g., DOT, IATA, IMDG), ensuring protection from heat, incompatible substances, and physical damage during transit. |
| Storage | 1,1,2,2-Tetrabromoethane should be stored in a tightly closed, corrosion-resistant container, in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area away from incompatible substances such as strong oxidizers. Protect the chemical from light and heat. Store at temperatures below 35°C and clearly label the storage area. Use secondary containment to prevent leaks, and restrict access to trained personnel only. |
|
Purity 99%: 1,1,2,2-Tetrabromoethane with purity 99% is used in mineral separation processes, where it enables precise density-based differentiation of minerals. High Density: 1,1,2,2-Tetrabromoethane with a high density of 2.96 g/cm³ is used in sink-float separation of ores, where it achieves high separation accuracy. Stability Temperature 100°C: 1,1,2,2-Tetrabromoethane with stability up to 100°C is used in laboratory flotation experiments, where it maintains chemical integrity under test conditions. Low Viscosity Grade: 1,1,2,2-Tetrabromoethane in a low viscosity grade is used for dispersing heavy media in dense media separation, where it promotes efficient mixing and particle suspension. Boiling Point 180°C: 1,1,2,2-Tetrabromoethane specified by a boiling point of 180°C is used in organic synthesis reactions, where it helps achieve controlled reaction conditions. Molecular Weight 345.7 g/mol: 1,1,2,2-Tetrabromoethane with molecular weight 345.7 g/mol is used as a calibration standard in analytical chemistry, where it ensures accurate measurement referencing. Melting Point 37°C: 1,1,2,2-Tetrabromoethane featuring a melting point of 37°C is used as a density modifier in laboratory research, where it facilitates easy handling and transition between solid and liquid phases. Refractive Index 1.68: 1,1,2,2-Tetrabromoethane with refractive index 1.68 is used in optical instrument calibration, where it enhances optical measurement precision. |
Competitive 1,1,2,2-Tetrabromoethane prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to admin@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: admin@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Among the family of brominated organic chemicals, 1,1,2,2-Tetrabromoethane occupies a unique spot. Its structure, with four bromine atoms snugly attached to a simple ethane backbone, gives it a distinct heft and a remarkable density. In the industrial world, this molecule often goes by the shorthand TBE. Real-world recognition of 1,1,2,2-Tetrabromoethane relies less on branded fanfare and more on its sheer utility, especially in mineral processing and specialty chemical applications. For someone who's spent time in a lab or heavy industry, the product's importance isn't just theoretical—it's foundational to separation tasks few other compounds can manage as efficiently.
One of the first things I learned while working with 1,1,2,2-Tetrabromoethane was how its high density—around 2.96 g/cm3—gave it a role that plain water or even salt solutions couldn't fill. Many minerals or plastics possess densities that fall into a tricky middle ground, where conventional separation media fail to draw clear lines. With TBE, the story changes: it enables gravity-based separation of minerals like fluorite, barite, or scheelite from gangue with a clarity that adds real value to ore processing. This saved countless man-hours in downstream refinement, and that’s something field managers remember.
Anytime you pull a sample from the earth—whether from a dusty Australian mine or the edge of a chilly Canadian quarry—you're looking at a mixed bag of promise and excess. The difference between a profitable load and an also-ran often boils down to clean, precise mineral separation. I recall one team that kept running into bottlenecks using heavy liquids like zinc chloride solutions. Problems with corrosion, tricky waste disposal, and inconsistent phase separation led to more headaches than results. We swapped in 1,1,2,2-Tetrabromoethane and, overnight, batch consistency improved. Recovery rates rose and headaches fell, which spoke volumes. In my view, the right product doesn’t just nudge output numbers—it changes the narrative for the people counting on that next shipment.
A key point here is solubility. TBE comes as a clear liquid at room temperature, so it’s easy to pour, mix, and recycle—especially compared to solids or gels that clog up lines. In the field, this clarity makes lab work faster and final results more straightforward, especially when time and clean separations make a difference. This isn’t just about hitting the lowest possible cost: it’s also about repeatability, reliability, and safety. Brominated liquids sometimes raise eyebrows given environmental worries, but the reality is, with closed-loop systems and trained personnel, risks remain manageable, and disposal plans stay sharp.
Chemists like to parse details, but for engineers and plant managers, what matters most is whether a product works every shift, not just on paper. TBE usually rolls into storage tanks with a purity over 98%, a boiling point at about 243°C, and a freezing point around 50°C. Volatility stays low, which keeps loss rates down, even in hot processing environments. That might not sound glamorous, but in practice, it keeps productivity up and safety checks straightforward. Handling TBE does call for care, since exposure can irritate the skin or lungs—not to mention the broader obligations to stay clear of water tables and open drains. In my experience, thorough training, up-to-date PPE, and robust ventilation make a huge difference. No product loves complacency, least of all one with the ability to move minerals so efficiently.
What always intrigues me about TBE is its chemical stability. Unlike many chlorinated analogs, it resists breakdown under typical lab conditions, so storage doesn’t devolve into a battle with shelf-life timers. Supply chain managers breathe easier when what leaves the barrel matches what arrives at the workbench. For labs tackling heavy liquid separation every day, this peace of mind makes TBE something of a standard-bearer. Consistency in a bottle, so to speak, avoids unnecessary recalibration or retesting, which keeps projects on schedule and on budget.
Some might wonder if other heavy liquids could fill the same role. Historically, chemists and geologists turned to alternatives like bromoform or methylene iodide to chase similar separation goals. In my own case, these other products scored points for density—sometimes even higher than TBE—but tough negatives shadowed their use. Bromoform, for example, was more volatile, tougher to handle safely, and sometimes left a sticky, persistent odor that spread across the workspace no matter how careful you were. Methylene iodide had its place, too, but turned out expensive, and with real safety concerns over long exposures.
By contrast, TBE threads the needle: it brings enough density to separate nearly all common industrial minerals, but maintains a practical boiling point and manageable toxicity profile. Cost remains competitive for most mid-scale and large-scale projects. Over multiple projects in my career, the break-even analysis nearly always swung back to TBE—particularly in settings where throughput and worker well-being both counted. Environmental management also looms large in modern decisions. While no heavy liquid comes without environmental tradeoffs, TBE’s relatively stable profile and established recycling protocols help teams limit waste and meet regulatory scrutiny.
For facilities transitioning from older methods, the practical side of switching in TBE stands out. Existing glassware, pipelines, and tankage usually accommodate it without expensive retrofits. Training requirements stay in line with what most certified chemical handlers already know. The path from purchase to first use is shorter, which means faster returns—a factor not to be underestimated for production planners.
Mineral processing remains the main staging ground for TBE. Ore samples ride a dense medium circuit, separating diamonds from the host rock or picking out valuable tungsten from a mixed-up slurry. TBE’s specific density makes it flexible enough to shift cut-off points simply by adding or withdrawing solvent. In a busy analysis lab, a technician can adjust concentrations on the fly, target exactly the right density window, and push for the sharpest separation. That’s the kind of direct control that drives improved yield, cleaner concentrates, and in turn, better downstream smelting or refining.
Beyond mining, I came across TBE doing heavy lifting behind the scenes in plastics recycling. Density separation sorts PVC from PET, for example, by suspending shredded particles in the liquid and letting gravity do the work. Alternatives often forced tricky compromises, like high temperatures or awkward additives to get the densities just right. TBE handles the job smoothly at room temperature, no excess energy required. That switch changed the economics of recycling plants in tangible ways—lower power bills, fewer complaints about contamination, and happier end customers who got a cleaner product line.
Another unsung application comes in analytical chemistry, especially for density-based particle sizing. Labs focused on soil science use TBE to fractionate mineral grains, providing better data on silt, sand, and clay content. In turn, that information boosts crop planning or construction foundation work, narrowing risk and saving costs. Whether for science or industry, this kind of versatility sets TBE apart from single-use, limited-scope alternatives.
Anyone with hands-on experience working with brominated organics knows the conversation around safety never stops. TBE’s high density and low volatility make storage a bit less fraught than lighter, more volatile alternatives, but direct contact should always be avoided. Over the years, the best-run sites I’ve seen pair tight, spill-resistant transfer systems with simple, clear training and incident drills. Eye wash stations near workbenches or centralized chemical handling bays reduce risks from splash incidents, while closed-circuit systems keep fumes from escaping. These simple steps preserve both worker health and production uptime.
From an environmental perspective, the responsible use and disposal of TBE carries real weight. Regulators keep a close eye on where brominated compounds travel, given the risks to aquatic life and the persistence of halogenated organics in soil and water. Teams with the best track records stick to recover-and-recycle systems, which reclaim most of the TBE used in processing and keep it out of municipal waste streams. In my career, the difference between an incident and smooth operation often came down to how thoroughly waste lines were segregated and how often storage tanks got inspected. Stopping problems at the source means less clean-up later and greater trust from nearby communities.
Using TBE well depends on striking a balance: getting the separation power the job requires while keeping systems closed and personnel well-equipped. Newer technologies, including scrubbers and automated pump controls, strengthen existing safeguards. I’ve watched modern plants invest in these updates not just to tick compliance boxes but to attract partners and buyers who rank environmental responsibility as highly as cost per ton.
One lesson I learned early was to look beyond familiarity and constantly ask whether a traditional workflow still makes sense. TBE’s staying power owes a lot to its rare combination of high density, stability, and practicality. Nonetheless, innovation keeps pressing forward. Some research teams are eyeing high-molecular-weight water-based solutions or greener organics, though up to now, the real-world data still points to TBE as the trusted workhorse in mineral and plastic separation.
Calls for better stewardship aren’t just regulatory exercises—they often spring from the teams working closest to these chemicals. After several years alongside analytical chemists and field engineers, it’s clear that most people want systems that not only perform but also safeguard both users and communities. That’s where tools like TBE, while not perfect, set up opportunities for improvement. The push for more robust recycling, better tracking, and transparent sourcing will only grow. Future generations of chemical separations may look different, but the lessons learned from heavy liquids like TBE will guide those next steps.
No product can claim to answer every need. There are places where TBE’s density overshoots the mark, and creative engineers turn instead to blends or entirely new approaches. Scale-up can bring surprises—tank seals might need checking, or lines may need reinforcement against halogenated exposure. I remember a processing plant that missed a minor gasket upgrade after increasing TBE throughput, and the resulting downtime cost more than any savings from sticking with off-the-shelf seals. Lessons like that underscore why trusted supply partners, robust training, and solid maintenance plans matter as much as specs on a data sheet. Robust documentation and lessons shared across sites keep everyone safer and more efficient.
Some regulatory frameworks have begun nudging companies toward life-cycle analyses, asking not only where a chemical goes but also what it takes to produce and recycle. TBE stands up well in many of these reviews because established chains of custody already exist, and recycling systems work with existing infrastructure. Looking ahead, there’s room for tighter monitoring—think sensor-equipped tanks that flag leaks or real-time tracking for waste transfers. These advances marry environmental stewardship with on-the-ground practicality, helping both regulators and plant managers sleep a little easier.
Smaller labs and startups may worry about initial costs or perceived hazards. Based on my experience, shared best practices and accessible training resources can lower barriers to entry. New users benefit from shadowing experienced technicians during their first setup and from easy-to-understand guides that highlight common pitfalls and smart safety habits. Taking the mystery out of chemical handling helps more operators tap into what makes TBE valuable, without repeating the missteps that trip up unseasoned teams.
One strength I’ve seen with TBE across decades is the resilience of its supply chain. While global disruptions shake up some specialty chemicals, TBE enjoys well-established routes from production to end-user. Reliable quality checks, batch tracking, and robust packaging help prevent surprises, even on shipments that travel halfway around the globe. That consistency empowers companies to plan without worrying about last-minute substitutions or hasty process tweaks—a real boon for both lab managers and procurement leaders.
Partnerships with researchers and waste processors play a quiet but essential role. Forward-thinking companies regularly join pilot programs to recycle used TBE more efficiently, test alternative solvents, or recover byproducts into safer waste streams. This collaborative approach pays dividends: not only does it keep compliance officers and local communities on side, it sparks the kinds of incremental improvements that make a long-term difference for both budgets and the planet.
TBE does not operate in a vacuum. Its continued relevance depends on a broader context—markets demanding cleaner production, advances in separation science, and evolving regulatory landscapes in every major jurisdiction. By fostering honest feedback loops from the factory floor right up to R&D, the industry can both tackle current challenges and stay prepared for new opportunities as they arise.
After years spent in both bustling laboratories and sprawling manufacturing plants, the value of experience becomes unmistakable. Tools like TBE anchor work that touches everything from mining and plastics to advanced materials and geoscience. Its ongoing evolution reflects an industry that constantly weighs risks against rewards, safety against output, and tradition against innovation. The stories, lessons, and progress made with this chemical set the foundation for future solutions, providing a living link between proven practice and the pursuit of better answers. Each time a process engineer or lab manager leans into a tricky separation, chances are, they draw on this legacy—reshaped daily by the choices and effort of those who work at the sharp end of the process.
The path forward relies on putting learning into practice, sharing knowledge widely, and refining processes so safety, efficiency, and stewardship move together. 1,1,2,2-Tetrabromoethane, while not without its drawbacks, anchors this balance. As new advancements surface, drawing from established strengths and practical wisdom will keep technology not only relevant but reliably in service of progress.