|
HS Code |
455250 |
| Common Name | Imazethapyr |
| Chemical Formula | C15H19N3O3 |
| Cas Number | 81335-77-5 |
| Molecular Weight | 289.33 g/mol |
| Physical State | Solid (crystalline powder) |
| Color | White to pale yellow |
| Solubility In Water | 0.14 g/L at 20°C |
| Mode Of Action | Acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibitor |
| Primary Use | Herbicide |
| Application Method | Pre- and post-emergence |
| Toxicity To Humans | Low |
| Stability | Stable under normal conditions |
As an accredited Imazethapyr factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | The packaging for Imazethapyr features a 1-liter HDPE bottle with a secure screw cap, clear labeling, and hazard warnings. |
| Shipping | Imazethapyr should be shipped in tightly sealed, clearly labeled containers, compliant with relevant regulations. Store and transport it in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated area, away from incompatible substances. Handle with care to prevent leaks or spills. Always follow all applicable local, national, and international shipping guidelines for chemicals. |
| Storage | Imazethapyr should be stored in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area away from direct sunlight and incompatible substances such as strong acids or bases. Keep the container tightly closed and clearly labeled. Store away from food, feed, and water sources to prevent contamination. Follow all local, state, and federal regulations regarding chemical storage and handling for maximum safety. |
Applications of Imazethapyr in Industrial ManufacturingAs a core-selective herbicidal active, Imazethapyr supports precise weed management frameworks across modern large-scale crop protection supply chains. Below we outline its real, specialized downstream industrial applications in regulated agricultural chemical production, each defined by strict compliance standards, application-specific formulation ratios, detailed production stage entry, and targeted finished product types. 1. Pre-Emergence Herbicide Formulations for Soybean CultivationFormulation manufacturers producing pre-emergence herbicides for soy cultivation rely on Imazethapyr for its targeted residual activity against broadleaf and grassy weed species. The technical grade is dissolved and stabilized in water-based or emulsifiable concentrate systems, addressing the specific weed spectrums and soil profiles indicated for soy. Determining the correct dosage is crucial for maintaining legal residue tolerances and efficacy in field applications. Industry compliance standards
Typical usage ratio
Downstream process integration
Final product types
2. Post-Emergence Herbicide Production for Peanut and Pea FarmingIndustrial pesticide formulators use Imazethapyr to produce post-emergence herbicides dedicated to leguminous crops, notably peanuts and peas. The material’s ability to selectively inhibit weed enzyme pathways supports crop safety criteria and region-specific resistance management guidelines. Precise dosing and QA controls ensure label-compliant performance over a range of climate and irrigation conditions. Industry compliance standards
Typical usage ratio
Downstream process integration
Final product types
3. Herbicide-Resistant Crop Seed Treatment SolutionsSeed treatment manufacturers integrate Imazethapyr into proprietary coatings for seeds of crops genetically engineered with imidazolinone resistance. Strict regulatory oversight applies to these processes to ensure trait stewardship, residue management, and seed viability, with trace control from raw active to final treated batch packaging. Industry compliance standards
Typical usage ratio
Downstream process integration
Final product types
4. Granular and Dry-Blend Herbicide Production for Industrial Land ManagementSpecialty manufacturers producing granular and dry-blend herbicide formats for non-agricultural land management, such as railroad rights-of-way and utility corridors, utilize Imazethapyr for residual action in porous or non-cultivated soils. Production mandates strict monitoring of particle size, dust-off characteristics, and blend uniformity to ensure downstream efficacy and compliance with local non-food land-use regulations. Industry compliance standards
Typical usage ratio
Downstream process integration
Final product types
5. Herbicide Premix Concentrates for Multi-Active Crop ProtectionProducers manufacturing multi-active herbicide premixes for rotational crop systems leverage Imazethapyr to complement grass and sedge control spectrums. Incorporation focuses on compatibility and chemical stability in mixed active concentrates, supported by comprehensive shelf-life, tank-mix, and resistance management validation, in alignment with technical and regulatory dossiers for combination products. Industry compliance standards
Typical usage ratio
Downstream process integration
Final product types
6. Water-Dispersible Granule (WDG) Manufacturing for Precision Application MarketsAgrochemical processors specializing in water-dispersible granule production design these formulations for accurate measurement, handling safety, and reduced environmental drift in mechanized application settings. Each WDG batch, incorporating Imazethapyr as a lead or supporting active, undergoes particle size homogenization and dispersibility trials to meet contract specification and environmental safety targets for major cereal and legume crops. Industry compliance standards
Typical usage ratio
Downstream process integration
Final product types
|
Competitive Imazethapyr prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to admin@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: admin@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Farmers and agriculture professionals know weeds as one of the most persistent threats to efficient crop growth in modern agriculture. Imazethapyr, made on our lines from raw synthesis through the final mill, has proven an effective answer over many growing seasons. As a manufacturer, we have worked to refine both the production process and the finished product so it aligns with the real-world challenges growers meet in the field. Imazethapyr stands out not just as a chemistry but as a result of intentional decisions in process and partnership with those managing thousands of hectares of arable land.
Behind every kilogram of Imazethapyr that leaves our factory is a series of quality steps that define its uniform performance. Starting with high-grade raw materials and controlled synthesis environments, we monitor impurity levels using advanced chromatography systems. Precision here isn’t just for reports—it matters for the consistent burn-down and residual activity users look for. Our team keeps active ingredient content stable, usually between 95% and 98% in the technical grade, depending on the formulation required. Every batch receives sensory and chemical checks because minor impurity shifts can influence how well product mixes into carriers, survives storage, and performs under different soil or weather conditions. We have witnessed how these technical differences show up as either steady weed control or patchy coverage in the field.
Out on farms, Imazethapyr rarely works alone. We mostly manufacture and supply it in two forms: technical grade for local formulators, and ready-for-use products in select cases such as 10% SL (soluble liquid) or 70% WG (water-dispersible granules). Our formulation team has learned over seasons that not every crop and weed rotation needs the same delivery. For example, SL versions offer faster dissolution and are favored where immediate uptake is key, whereas WG granules suit areas with extended rainy periods since they avoid rapid run-off. Choosing the vehicle isn’t academic: it relates directly to issues like nozzle clogging, tank-mix compatibility, and shelf-life under humid ambient conditions. We have found growers working in maize and soybean rotations prefer WG forms because of lower dust-off and less exposure risk during mixing, whereas some rice producers still rely on SL due to simplicity and quick uptake.
Many synthetic herbicides promise broad-spectrum knockdown. From manufacturing and field follow-up, we have seen several factors that set Imazethapyr apart. First, its spectrum works against a solid range of annual grasses and broadleaf weeds, with a mode of action that interrupts amino acid synthesis in weeds, effectively starving unwanted plants early in their growth. This selectivity lets crops like soybean and groundnut thrive without damage at recommended rates. Compared to products like imazapic or imazamox, Imazethapyr offers a longer soil residual effect, enabling longer intervals between applications yet allows flexibility in many crop rotation programs. Some farmers used to rely on sulfonylureas for post-emergence weed control, but our field support teams uncovered increased tolerance issues. Switching to Imazethapyr reduced resistance build-up, with less re-treatment needed across multi-year cycles.
Another point of difference arrives in how Imazethapyr can integrate with minimum-tillage and conservation farming systems. Glyphosate often dominates these conversations, but it has less soil persistence and no residual action. Our technical trials confirmed that applying Imazethapyr, especially in combination modes, cuts down the overall synthetic load necessary through the season. Fewer passes mean lower fuel consumption, reduced compaction, and better soil structure over time. Meeting with growers after harvest, we often discuss how a single product choice at the start of the year shapes weed pressure for multiple cropping seasons. This isn’t just chemistry; it is operational reality.
Based on our engagement with agronomists and progressive growers, Imazethapyr works best in soils with neutral to slight acidity, as alkaline conditions sometimes force tank-mix adjustments for optimal uptake. We have engineered our formulations to tolerate moderate water pH shifts, but continuous user attention to local water sources remains essential. In peanut, soybean, and pulse crops, pre-emergence application blocks the main flush of broadleaf and grass weeds, letting plants get established with minimal stress. It can also be used post-emergence under specific conditions—rainy interludes may call for careful timing to avoid leaching losses. Our technical support team often works with growers on proper timing: too early, and weed seeds escape treatment; too late, and crop injury risk rises.
Over the years, we have listened to concerns about rotation intervals and crop safety. Early imitations of similar chemistry led to issues like carryover injury in subsequent cereal crops. In our own replant studies and field surveys, we found that following labeled rates and observing interval guidance prevented yield drag in maize and wheat. In places where high rainfall risked rapid wash-through, we advised split applications or reduced-rate approaches—this flexibility kept fields weed-free but guarded the yield potential for next-in-line crops. None of this knowledge comes from theory; it reflects hard lessons learned with our own product in hands-on collaboration across regions.
The question of herbicide resistance hits close to home for those of us who make and support crop protection tools. Year after year, we observe farms where repeated monoculture and constant mode-of-action pressure select for resistant weed populations faster than anyone predicts. Imazethapyr offers a different tool thanks to its unique targeting of acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS) enzymes, but that doesn’t mean resistance can never come. Our internal resistance management team keeps records of use history, resistance patches, and evolving best practices. For our part, we support stewardship efforts—promoting careful field scouting, rotation of chemistries, and integration with mechanical controls like shallow tillage when needed.
Our researchers have fielded requests from agronomists seeking tank-mix partners and sequenced application windows. For example, mixing Imazethapyr with other herbicides, such as pendimethalin or flumioxazin, can minimize the risk of shifts in dominant weed species and slow the onset of resistance. Many of the success stories we track come from growers who follow these layered approaches—switching up actives, altering application timing, and treating management as a season-long project instead of just a single spray event. As a result, they see cleaner fields, lower weed seed banks in subsequent years, and maintain the utility of Imazethapyr for the long haul. This commitment to stewardship underlines why manufacturers like us work in partnership with both farmers and research institutions.
Manufacturers carry responsibilities beyond just delivering chemistry. From the outset, we have examined the environmental footprint of Imazethapyr across its life cycle. The molecule breaks down through microbial action in the soil, with most dissipation occurring within weeks to a few months depending on local weather, microbial density, and moisture levels. In our post-market analysis, we have recorded limited leaching risk in typical label use, but sandy soils and high rainfall always call for extra caution.
We operate with the reality that stewardship has moved from optional to core expectation. Local regulators now scrutinize every ingredient—not just for active content but for inert carriers and surfactants. We reformulated our water-dispersible granules to keep dust-off low and reduce worker exposure during mixing and loading. By listening to feedback from applicators, we shifted from solvent-based liquids to aqueous solutions where possible, lowering volatility and off-target movement. These changes came from real farms and real feedback, not just theoretical debates. We have observed inspectors pay close attention to drip lines, spray drift, and buffer zones. Our field engineers support safety training and compliance, because product stewardship strongly influences both regulatory approval and the license to operate in export markets.
Whenever a new active ingredient gains market share, misinformation and confusion are never far behind. Over the seasons, we have encountered recurring questions: whether Imazethapyr residues will harm non-target plants, if carryover can affect sensitive crops even at low rates, or if the molecule accumulates with repeated use. Our internal trials and third-party reviews consistently show that, when used according to label directions and crop rotation intervals, fields cycle cleanly without buildup or off-target damage. We remain honest about the rare instances where rapid re-cropping or extreme weather call for extra monitoring. For example, periods of drought tend to slow microbial degradation, leading to slightly extended persistence in the soil. We have updated labels and provided technical bulletins to make this knowledge practical in decision-making.
Each growing season brings new questions, like the safety of grazing livestock on treated fields or how tank cleaning protocols should be modified following an Imazethapyr run. We work alongside extension agencies to conduct livestock feeding trials and publish mixing order recommendations. Our hands-on experience proves that direct feedback from the field does more to improve both product and practice than any volume of lab-only testing.
Some outside the industry imagine bulk chemical production as an exercise in scale, but our experience points toward the opposite: precision is everything. Each shipment from our facility carries batch documentation, verified by both our internal lab and third-party auditors whenever possible. Analytical results—like active ingredient assay and impurity profile—reach our downstream partners in advance. Problems can and do surface: an occluded filter, a line temperature spike, a mixer variation. We do not hide from these; instead, we openly troubleshoot, recalibrate, and, when necessary, pull product that does not meet standard. Reliability on the farm links straight back to these daily practices.
Our customers—growers large and small—come back to us season after season for a reason. They have seen, under real conditions, that product consistency ties directly to plant safety and weed control. A formulation that clogs in the tank or varies in strength causes lost time and reduced margins for everyone down the line. We view every new production run not as a commodity process but as a promise: the work behind each drum or bag stands for predictability when the stakes are highest.
Shifts in global agriculture—climate, regulation, consumer demand—push both us and our customers to adapt. In some regions, governmental restrictions on older chemistries or heightened scrutiny over groundwater safety have created new incentives to move toward selective, low-dose products like Imazethapyr. Unlike broad-spectrum burners that can damage the soil microflora, our molecule fits well into integrated weed management programs aimed at maintaining environmental and economic sustainability. Farmers in export-driven sectors must now meet residue limits that move lower every year. Our regular residue testing assures compliance both domestically and for international buyers—an area increasingly important with tightening import standards in Asia, Europe, and beyond.
Price pressures and land cost have changed how growers and co-ops build cropping plans. Longer rotation periods, stacked herbicide strategies, and reduced passes all factor in the decision calculus. We develop learning programs for our downstream partners that focus not just on Imazethapyr in isolation but as part of whole-system resilience. Those same cost drivers motivate our ongoing work to optimize input costs by providing concentrated bulk shipments, reusable packaging, and technical support to minimize waste at every step. These practical efforts have kept customer retention high and allowed us to influence how sustainable practices scale across larger growing regions.
Our experience as a manufacturer does not end at the shipment dock. We know successful weed management evolves year by year with climate, policy, and even seed technology. The next wave of innovation will center on even more targeted uses, with lower total application rates and more specific spectrum. We continue to work closely with seed companies developing clearfield and other tolerant varieties, ensuring our Imazethapyr formulations can perform at peak with modern genetics. Recent studies in our internal R&D center have pointed to ways of further reducing dust load in granules and improving low-temperature solubility, helping users in colder growing seasons extend their application windows.
Digital technologies bring another layer; many of our customers now use farm management software to optimize inputs against site-specific weed mapping. As a manufacturer, we are updating our own support materials and field guides to align with these advances. Our future work includes fine-tuning formulations to mix seamlessly with variable-rate sprayer systems and to track real-time tank-mix stability in diverse conditions. The focus remains the same: answers grounded in field experience, shaped by robust manufacturing, and guided by relentless quality assurance.
Decades in this industry have taught us that being a manufacturer means more than producing product. It means building trust with both the science and the people who depend on our chemistry for productive, profitable seasons. Every improvement in Imazethapyr—from synthesis to packaging—grew out of problems faced and solved together with partners who understand that reliable tools make for sustainable farming. Our team stands behind every batch not because a label demands it, but because each improvement on our side brings real rewards for growers, food systems, and the land itself.