|
HS Code |
611088 |
| Chemical Name | Succinic Acid |
| Synonyms | Butanedioic acid |
| Cas Number | 110-15-6 |
| Molecular Formula | C4H6O4 |
| Molecular Weight | 118.09 g/mol |
| Purity | ≥99.5% |
| Appearance | White crystalline powder |
| Melting Point | 185-187 °C |
| Boiling Point | 235 °C (decomposes) |
| Solubility In Water | 83 g/L (20 °C) |
| Density | 1.56 g/cm³ (20 °C) |
| Ph | 2.6 (0.1 M solution) |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Storage Temperature | Room temperature |
| Un Number | UN 3261 |
As an accredited Succinic Acid (≥99.5%) factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Succinic Acid (≥99.5%) is packaged in a 500g white HDPE bottle with a tamper-evident blue screw cap and clear labeling. |
| Shipping | **Shipping Description for Succinic Acid (≥99.5%)**: Succinic Acid (≥99.5%) is shipped in tightly sealed containers, protected from moisture and direct sunlight. It is classified as a non-hazardous, solid chemical, typically transported via road, air, or sea. Ensure compliance with local regulations and provide suitable labeling and documentation for safe handling during transit. |
| Storage | Succinic Acid (≥99.5%) should be stored in a tightly sealed container, in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated area, away from moisture, heat sources, and incompatible materials such as strong oxidizing agents. It should be protected from direct sunlight and stored at room temperature. Proper labeling and secure shelving help prevent accidental spills and ensure safe handling. |
|
Purity: Succinic Acid (≥99.5%) is used in pharmaceutical synthesis, where high purity ensures batch-to-batch reproducibility and safety. Melting Point: Succinic Acid (≥99.5%) is utilized in polymer manufacturing, where defined melting point enables consistent polymerization processes. Molecular Weight: Succinic Acid (≥99.5%) is applied in food additives formulation, where precise molecular weight ensures predictable acidity control. Particle Size: Succinic Acid (≥99.5%) is incorporated into beverage acidulation, where controlled particle size guarantees uniform solubility and dispersion. Thermal Stability: Succinic Acid (≥99.5%) is employed in biodegradable plastics production, where excellent thermal stability supports high-temperature processing. Water Solubility: Succinic Acid (≥99.5%) is used in buffering solutions for analytical laboratories, where high solubility enables rapid dissolution and preparation. Ash Content: Succinic Acid (≥99.5%) is included in cosmetics manufacturing, where low ash content prevents formulation contamination. Residual Solvents: Succinic Acid (≥99.5%) is used in the synthesis of active pharmaceutical ingredients, where minimal residual solvents meet stringent regulatory limits. Heavy Metal Content: Succinic Acid (≥99.5%) is utilized in dietary supplement production, where low heavy metal levels assure product safety and compliance. Moisture Content: Succinic Acid (≥99.5%) is applied in flavor enhancer formulations, where low moisture content preserves shelf stability and potency. |
Competitive Succinic Acid (≥99.5%) prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to admin@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: admin@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Succinic acid, in its purest form at ≥99.5%, holds a unique role in both industry and daily life. The model we review meets demands for clarity and consistency, with fine, crystalline powder as its signature. Every batch at this high grade means fewer impurities, fewer surprises in downstream work, and a reliable starting point for products that matter. My own experience working with mid-grade chemicals taught me the unmistakable difference tight spec margins offer—a project lands on target more often, costs stay controlled, and troubleshooting goes down to rare events rather than routine headaches. As someone who’s dealt with supply standards, I know how much smoother processes run when the raw material is predictable. This isn't always a given in the global chemical trade, especially for acids where mishandling or corner-cutting can produce real performance losses.
In practical terms, using succinic acid at 99.5% or above takes uncertainty off the table for many manufacturers. Compare that to lower grades, with 95% or 97% composition, and quality variation creeps in—minor contaminants start to impact color, stability, and ultimately the confidence anyone can place in the end product. That’s critical for companies making polymers, food ingredients, or pharmaceuticals, where a deviation of even half a percent in purity can ripple out into thousands of dollars lost. In my early years sourcing ingredients for food scenarios, I noticed cheaper acid meant more filtration and more back-and-forth with QA. Sometimes the batch didn’t pass muster and went straight to waste. Strict standards, like those seen with ≥99.5% succinic acid, cut these costs at their origin, which is sometimes overlooked until budgets come under pressure.
Succinic acid, often referenced by its CAS number (110-15-6), shows up as a white, nearly odorless powder or granule in this top quality form. With a melting point around 185°C, solubility in water, and stable behavior across a range of processes, it bridges a lot of production steps. The product features a molecular formula of C4H6O4 and molar mass close to 118.09 g/mol. But it’s not specs on paper that drive industry preferences—it’s what those numbers allow in the mix. Consistent melting and neutral pH mean less pH adjustment and more flexibility in recipe-building, from thermoplastics to bio-based solvents. For me, specs always translate into small wins on the factory floor: fewer alarms, smoother transitions between batches, and real-time resource savings, especially for teams managing dozens of input variables in a run.
This acid finds its way into more places than many realize. It’s a workhorse in making biodegradable polymers like PBS (polybutylene succinate), paves the way for eco-friendlier plastics, and serves as a key intermediate for coatings, dyes, flavorings, and even the pharmaceutical field. In food, it acts as an acidity regulator and flavor enhancer—think of candies and beverages tuned to precise tartness. Pharmaceutical companies look for it in buffer solutions and as part of certain pain medications. Someone might overlook why these industries keep premium acid in their supply chain, but the answer is simple: fewer impurities smooth regulatory approvals, cut testing downtime, and keep reputation intact.
I once joined an audit with a team looking for root causes of repeated yellowing in a plastics line. After weeks of poking around, we traced it to an acid batch that hovered just below 98%. The color difference wasn’t visible on its own, but downstream the yellow cast in finished goods was obvious. Since switching to the ≥99.5% product, the plant cut both scrap rates and customer complaints to nearly zero. This process shows how good chemistry goes far beyond the beaker—it’s about trust between plant, supplier, and client.
Lower grade succinic acid can work for some agricultural or industrial feedstock roles, but when high-value production steps in, so does higher grade. Unrefined lots often bring in mineral salts, insoluble specks, or organic remains from earlier stages. These impurities can interfere with reaction rates, skew analysis results, or slow automated equipment. In contrast, ≥99.5% grade means less downtime for cleaning, fewer batch adjustments, and more reproducible results yield after yield. I remember reviewing cost analyses for both pharmaceutical and food applications. The upfront price difference between top-grade and standard-grade acid can look steep, but tally the costs for additional purification, extra QC tests, and delay penalties—and the numbers quickly tip in favor of the higher purity product.
Some may choose a mid-tier product based on sticker price, especially in industries not tightly regulated. Still, anyone facing tight specifications or dealing with regular third-party audits knows how much value comes from not sweating every load. Once, a medium-sized nutraceutical producer switched to a lower-purity acid to cut costs; three months later, a spike in rejection rates and flavor complaints led management to revert to ≥99.5%. The hidden costs had quietly stacked up while apparent savings remained only on paper.
Consistency stands as one of the most undervalued qualities in a raw material. Plants and labs running complex reactions don’t have the luxury or time for laborious batch-by-batch adjustment. During my time managing chemical workflows, the stress and unpredictability from low-grade material quickly outweighed any savings. Anyone who’s dealt with variability at scale knows the pain point: whether it’s hours lost in reformulation, or lab personnel scrambling to troubleshoot an unexpected deviation, that cost hits productivity and team morale hard. Products aren’t just a set of chemical values—they’re the lifeblood of an operation.
Reliable succinic acid also proves itself over years rather than days or weeks. A few instances taught me that switching grade introduces subtle problems—discoloration in packaged goods, ruined flavor in beverages, or catalytic failure in organic synthesis. These headaches rarely occur with top-grade lots. In my view, anyone pushing for a switch needs to understand, beyond purchase price, the full story of post-purchase cost and risk.
Succinic acid now plays its part in the global effort toward greener production. Sourced increasingly from renewable feedstocks, it supports the creation of bio-based plastics and solvents. Plants embracing non-petroleum sources appreciate high-purity feedstock because it lets them validate claims and meet third-party certifications with fewer hoops. I’ve watched the bioplastics movement advance, and it’s clear—investments in top-grade acid help fast-track products into markets that demand both performance and proof of origin. Companies making compostable cups or packaging can advertise “from renewable sources, free of harsh chemicals,” traceable back to the clean acid in their process. If the input isn’t reliable, the sustainability story falls apart—not only in marketing but in product shelf life and downstream emissions.
Staying ahead in sustainability often comes from tiny details like purity, background processes, and supply traceability. As an industry observer, it’s easy to tell when claims falter because of poorly controlled raw materials. With more governments requiring full breakdowns of supply chains, clean and well-documented chemical inputs like ≥99.5% succinic acid are no longer “nice-to-have”—they’re essential. Tighter regulations in regions like Europe and North America push producers to demand this type of raw input, and those that respond early tend to lead, not just follow.
Technical advances continue to raise the bar. Conventional uses in resins, polyesters, and dyes remain, but new methods for electronics and biotech increase expectations around purity. Every laboratory or plant manager who’s gone through intermediate disruptions knows how one bad batch can upend months of process refinement. A buy from a trusted supplier with strict controls reduces these nightmares. Plants also want documentation—auditable CoAs, traceable batch numbers, adherence to ISO or GMP where required. My experience with regulatory checklists for food and pharma has shown how much time gets lost chasing suspect paperwork from budget-grade vendors. Reliable suppliers keep this invisible—until someone gets burned by missing paperwork at an audit.
It’s easy to overlook how the broader quality mindset shapes downstream innovation. If a chemical input contains traces of something unexpected, a new formula can stumble out of the gates. Many who manage new product launches can share stories of how tiny impurities cause everything from gel failure in lab plastics to unexpected fermentation rates in food processing. Experience teaches that building a solid chain of trust starts with what goes into the tank, not just what rolls off the line.
Safety always ties back to material reliability. Food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetics sectors need raw acids certified to reduce the risk of contamination. Regulations, both regional and international, keep tightening, asking suppliers for more documentation and higher precision. For customers, especially brand owners in sensitive sectors, ≥99.5% means not worrying about end-user health or costly recalls. One supplier I worked with discovered a slightly out-of-spec acid led to months of tracing, retesting, and explaining to government agencies. You don’t forget stress like that, nor the extra insurance premiums that follow.
End users often can’t test every batch of every ingredient, so they depend on robust upstream controls. Clean, tested succinic acid forms part of that invisible safety net. Batch homogeneity, minimal byproducts, and repeatable outcomes build customer trust—and repeat sales. As a food product developer, peace of mind came only after seeing plant records match what was on my desk. Emergency interventions, recalls, or even minor quality slips risk eroding that trust at a pace hard to rebuild.
Over the past decade, knowledge-sharing has improved the way buyers, users, and producers interact around chemical inputs. No one operates alone. Producers who open their processes to scrutiny, present E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness) clearly, and listen to end-user needs outperform their peers. Success, from my vantage point, isn’t just about lower defect rates—it’s about feedback loops where customers can flag anomalies or request tighter controls, and suppliers learn from real-world use. This avoids repeated cycles of standards failure, finger-pointing, and lost business. I’ve worked on multidisciplinary teams—from QA to sustainability—and I know that transparency saves time and delivers competitive edge.
Industry working groups, frequent third-party audits, and even certifications like ISO push all of us toward higher consistency and better collaboration. The strictures aren’t always popular at the outset, but after working through one traceability investigation, no one misses the days of uncertainty. A refined acid with ≥99.5% standard across batches stands as a testament to these collective improvements. It’s not simply about ticking boxes—it’s part of a culture of progress that benefits labs, shop floors, and ultimately, consumers.
High-purity succinic acid’s benefits become clearest with smart sourcing and clear communication between supplier and user. I’ve seen the best results when buyers insist on detailed CoAs, use independent verification periodically, and invest in strong long-term supplier relationships. Price negotiation remains an everyday reality, but it works best for both sides with honest conversations about spec flexibility, delivery cadence, and responsiveness in case issues arise. Some companies set up joint reviews that include factory visits and cross-testing—a trust-building move that often reveals new efficiencies.
Upstream, producers continue to innovate. New microbial fermentation, precision crystallization, and sustainability-minded process refinement can yield purer product while cutting carbon impact. Downstream, users gain from employing in-house testing, robust record-keeping, and clear escalation paths if anomalies show up. The best operations join technical collaboration with their suppliers to identify improvement areas. That might look like small feedback loops about how the acid performs in various recipes, or larger collaborative R&D projects to share risk and learning.
For those looking to transition from mid-purity or off-grade acids, phased switching—starting small, validating outcomes, and expanding as evidence grows—delivers smoother results than headline-making full-conversion plans. Training product teams to spot issues early and maintain feedback loops with suppliers closes gaps faster and makes root cause analysis straightforward. Over time, embedding lessons from good and bad batches builds organizational memory and places quality at the fore, not as an afterthought.
Choosing acid at ≥99.5% purity signals a commitment to long-term value, not short-term gain. As with many fundamental inputs, the cost per kilogram accounts for only part of the equation. In the big picture, lower defect rates, streamlined compliance work, and greater customer loyalty outweigh the temptation for temporary savings. I’ve seen operations gain market share—not by running every number to the bone, but by communicating that premium quality starts with premium raw material. This allows companies to position their brand around reliability as much as price or innovation.
Put simply, using top-notch succinic acid has a multiplying effect. Clean chemistry underpins steady output, fewer errors, and faster go-to-market times, which over years outpaces the savings found from bargain purchases. Experience across disciplines—process, product design, regulatory affairs—shows that small investments at the sourcing stage can head off large downstream headaches. In today’s climate of tight regulation and rapidly shifting consumer expectations, that can tip the industry’s winners and losers.
Every decision to use ≥99.5% succinic acid ties back to reliability, customer satisfaction, and future readiness. Industry learns, sometimes the hard way, that chemical input isn’t a place to gamble, especially in critical applications. Small gains in specification translate to huge gains over operating life, from safety and compliance all the way to sustainable advantage. Through solid supplier relationships, ongoing QA learning, and transparent collaboration, producers and users alike reap the rewards of predictably high standards—built on a molecule simple in structure, but critical in outcome.