|
HS Code |
810130 |
| Iupac Name | 1-(5-amino-2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-(difluoromethyl)-3-methyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-one |
| Cas Number | 86404-63-9 |
| Molecular Formula | C10H7Cl2F2N5O |
| Molecular Weight | 322.10 g/mol |
| Appearance | White to off-white solid |
| Melting Point | 162-166°C |
| Solubility In Water | Slightly soluble |
| Storage Conditions | Store at 2-8°C, protect from light and moisture |
| Smiles | CN1C(=O)N(C(=N1)C(F)F)C2=CC(=C(C=C2Cl)Cl)N |
| Inchi | InChI=1S/C10H7Cl2F2N5O/c1-19-8(18)16(10(13)14)9(17-19)5-2-6(11)7(12)4(15)3-5/h2-3,10H,15H2,1H3 |
| Synonyms | Diflumetorim |
| Logp | Estimated 1.9 |
As an accredited 1-(5-Amino-2,4-Dichlorophenyl)-4-Difluoromethyl-3-Methyl-1H-1,2,4-Triazol-5-One factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | White HDPE bottle with tamper-evident cap, labeled with chemical name, 25g net weight, hazard symbols, batch number, and storage instructions. |
| Shipping | Shipping of 1-(5-Amino-2,4-Dichlorophenyl)-4-Difluoromethyl-3-Methyl-1H-1,2,4-Triazol-5-One requires secure, leak-proof packaging in accordance with chemical transport regulations. The material must be labeled properly and accompanied by a Safety Data Sheet (SDS). Temperature and hazardous material considerations should be observed during transit to ensure safe and compliant delivery. |
| Storage | Store 1-(5-Amino-2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-difluoromethyl-3-methyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-one in a tightly sealed container, away from light and moisture. Keep it at room temperature (15–25 °C) in a well-ventilated, dry location, separate from incompatible substances. Ensure proper labeling and restrict access to trained personnel. Follow local regulations and use secondary containment to prevent accidental spills. |
|
Purity 99%: 1-(5-Amino-2,4-Dichlorophenyl)-4-Difluoromethyl-3-Methyl-1H-1,2,4-Triazol-5-One with purity 99% is used in pharmaceutical intermediate synthesis, where it ensures high yield and product integrity. Melting Point 210°C: 1-(5-Amino-2,4-Dichlorophenyl)-4-Difluoromethyl-3-Methyl-1H-1,2,4-Triazol-5-One with a melting point of 210°C is used in thermal high-stress formulations, where it maintains compound stability during processing. Particle Size <10 µm: 1-(5-Amino-2,4-Dichlorophenyl)-4-Difluoromethyl-3-Methyl-1H-1,2,4-Triazol-5-One with particle size <10 µm is used in agrochemical suspensions, where it enhances dispersion and bioavailability. Moisture Content <0.5%: 1-(5-Amino-2,4-Dichlorophenyl)-4-Difluoromethyl-3-Methyl-1H-1,2,4-Triazol-5-One with moisture content less than 0.5% is used in solid-state pharmaceutical formulations, where it prevents hydrolytic degradation. Stability Temperature up to 120°C: 1-(5-Amino-2,4-Dichlorophenyl)-4-Difluoromethyl-3-Methyl-1H-1,2,4-Triazol-5-One with stability temperature up to 120°C is used in industrial chemical processes, where it provides consistent reactivity under elevated conditions. |
Competitive 1-(5-Amino-2,4-Dichlorophenyl)-4-Difluoromethyl-3-Methyl-1H-1,2,4-Triazol-5-One prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615371019725 or mail to admin@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615371019725
Email: admin@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Every so often in the lab, someone comes across a compound that makes you reflect on the progress of chemical research. 1-(5-Amino-2,4-Dichlorophenyl)-4-Difluoromethyl-3-Methyl-1H-1,2,4-Triazol-5-One stands out as one of those molecules that signals a leap rather than a step. Its formula might not roll off the tongue, but those who spend time among notes, glassware, and endless reactions can quickly spot the unique structure that sets it apart. This compound, forged from careful manipulation of the triazole ring and selective substitution on its phenyl group, reflects years of steady work in pharmaceutical labs searching for better leads.
I remember trying to design molecules during my early days as a researcher, hoping for a breakthrough by swapping out atoms with a steady hand. The two chlorine atoms on the phenyl ring of this compound hint at targeted changes, not just for stability but for controlled activity. Scientists reach for chlorinated phenyl rings because they stick around longer in the bloodstream. The amino group at the 5 position does more than add solubility—it often boosts interaction with target sites, making it easier for the molecule to “shake hands” with enzymes or receptors. On the triazolone, the difluoromethyl and methyl groups help adjust metabolic fate in the body, catering to the real-world challenge that promising compounds routinely get chewed up too soon.
Within the lab, you learn quickly that theoretical ideas only count when chemicals behave in real conditions. Substitution patterns matter. Compared to basic triazolones, this particular core demonstrates robust activity against certain biological targets, such as pathogenic fungi and plant diseases, hinting at uses beyond textbooks. Its clever scaffold modification also gives it surprising resilience in tough reaction conditions; some colleagues prefer these difluoromethyl substitutions because they often result in greater chemical stability during scale-up.
Take my own experience working with specialty agrochemical intermediates—efforts to improve yield often get stuck finding substances both powerful and specific, strong enough to work in fields and safe enough for repeated use. This molecule's backbone makes it an attractive candidate for further development. Research into triazolone derivatives highlights their inhibition of specific enzymes in plant pathogens. The difluoromethyl group, small as it seems, fits snugly into certain active sites—nature rewards small tweaks. Chemists love such details because a simple atom can tilt the balance between a generic product and a best-seller with real field success.
Some chemistries reinforce their value by showing up repeatedly across patent filings and research journals. Over the past decade, products with closely related structures have made notable impacts in crop protection or even in developing new drug scaffolds for human health. Regulatory challenges always chime in, so structural stability and predictable metabolism smooth the pathway to approval. Triazolone-based products have drawn interest for their safety profile, their environmental breakdown patterns suggesting lower risks in many cases, though each candidate warrants measured investigation.
As an editorial observer, it’s easy to see a flood of “me-too” molecules—modest tweaks, repackaged with a new label. Here, the spread of modifications—amino, dichloro, difluoromethyl, and methyl—shows an intent to solve old problems rather than merely circle them. Unlike simpler phenyl-triazolones, which can break down under ultraviolet light or lose punch through oxidative degradation, this structure delivers better resistance without complicated protective groups or clunky side chains. Chemists report improved shelf-life and reduced off-target breakdown. In field or clinical settings, such reliability simply means fewer application cycles, less waste, and lower costs over time.
Earlier generations of triazolones sometimes fell short in solubility, requiring more solvents or creative formulation. Here, the combined presence of the amino group and difluoromethyl helps overcome those barriers. As a result, researchers have observed better dispersion in test blends, a factor that translates into smoother processes for both small-scale and commercial production. It's the kind of evolution that makes teams more willing to invest in downstream development: reliable performance, not just in a flask but in formulations headed for real-world use.
Practical chemists and formulation experts, myself included, care less about abstract potential and more about how a substance mixes, blends, tolerates temperature swings, and interacts with other ingredients. 1-(5-Amino-2,4-Dichlorophenyl)-4-Difluoromethyl-3-Methyl-1H-1,2,4-Triazol-5-One feeds into this reality. Integration into crop protection projects springs to mind; these compounds provide a backbone for selective fungicides, aiming for broad protection without harming beneficial species. Their enzyme-targeting profile allows specific action, a hard-won trait in agriculture where blanket treatments rarely age well.
Advanced research angles at medicinal targets, focusing on anti-inflammatory or antifungal activity, have found this kind of scaffold particularly outgoing. A friend working in pharmaceutical research once pointed out that carefully balanced substitutions like these raise the chances of finding a hit in high-throughput screens. These stories matter because they show a compound not staying stuck as a theory, but translating its characteristics into better acting, more controllable options for today’s challenges.
Science rests on comparative studies. Here’s where the story gets interesting. Related triazolone compounds, such as classic difenoconazole or tebuconazole, see wide use thanks to their broad spectrum and resistance profiles. But persistent challenges like developing resistance in fungi keep pressure on for new solutions. Analysis of this new molecule’s structural motifs reveals the introduction of the difluoromethyl group and the combination of electron-donating and withdrawing elements help maintain strong binding in enzyme active sites, a critical factor in retaining potency after repeat applications.
I have watched research teams switch focus toward these features, scoring new hits precisely where older designs failed. Industry reports point to better retention in foliage applications, less leaching, and higher consistency in outcomes during variable growing conditions. These improvements aren’t just metrics—they amount to more predictable results for clients, tighter production timelines, and fewer surprises in regulatory filings.
Researchers in pharmaceutical pipelines leverage these stability features, noting lower metabolic “escape routes” in microsomal breakdown studies. That matters for anyone working in preclinical phases, where losing active ingredient to metabolic churn stalls promising projects. My direct experience working with metabolically unstable compounds tells me that every small gain in stability shrinks timelines and cuts costs.
After working with a string of triazolone derivatives and other fungicidal intermediates, certain trends become clear. Simpler triazolones sometimes suffer from shallow selectivity in biological screening; adding just a difluoromethyl or amino group rarely flips the script. This compound’s unique mix sidesteps many common setbacks, such as rapid environmental breakdown or unpredictable cross-reactions in blends. Compared to more generic analogues, it withstands harsher mixing and transport conditions, extending shelf life.
One common headache with triazole-based products surfaces during formulation—some do not dissolve or mix well with standard agrochemical emulsifiers, leading to clumping or sedimentation over time. Colleagues in pilot-scale operations have remarked that this compound’s dual halogenation approach reduces stubbornness in mixing. While technical reports often focus on numbers, practical users know that trouble-free mixing means project managers and chemists spend fewer hours troubleshooting and recalibrating processes.
In crop science, the impact becomes visible when treatments stand up to heavy rainfall or sun exposure. Traditional options may require repeated applications, wiping out cost savings and raising environmental flags. Research on triazolone derivatives with structures similar to this one reports lower runoff and more persistent coverage. This gives end-users more flexibility about timing and reduces overall chemical load in treated environments.
Pharmaceutical development adds another perspective. Many promising drugs falter not from lack of potency but because of poor stability or solubility. Here, the difluoromethyl-methyl motif influences lipophilicity—striking an effective balance between blood-brain barrier penetration and plasma retention. Medicinal chemists tell me that fighting the twin problems of metabolic breakdown and low systemic absorption often buries new therapies before they reach human trials. Innovations like this enable faster advances past cell-based assays toward animal testing, and eventually, clinical applications.
Real-world science rarely hands out simple victories. Promising new molecules always prompt questions about their broader effects—how they break down in complex real environments, their by-products, their interaction with existing treatment regimes. Progress takes more than strong lab results. Regulators, stewards of both public health and environmental integrity, look for thorough metabolite tracking, proof of low persistence, and assurances on side effects. In crowded market spaces, safer breakdown patterns or less toxic by-products carve out an advantage. Testing and transparent disclosure always form part of this next step.
From my own time dealing with regulatory submission, one lesson stuck—unexpected stability can bring good news (long-lasting action, fewer applications) or challenges (delayed breakdown or bioaccumulation). Here, the structural specifics pull toward the beneficial side: carbon–halogen and triazolone bonds tend not to linger excessively in environmental settings, especially under field conditions. Preliminary peer-reviewed studies show that triazolone-based candidates of similar structure usually degrade to benign products when used as recommended.
Usage at scale always draws scrutiny, too. Regular dialogue with farmers or pharmacists—those on the ground—reveals a preference for substances that balance fast action and manageable residue levels. The design that went into this molecule supports such a goal. Compared to older triazoles, this candidate reduces fallout onto secondary crops or non-target organisms.
The best innovations build on what came before, and this compound embodies that mindset. I recall the frustration of running countless trials on analogues that melted down in formulation or failed to persist beyond a warm afternoon in storage. Tweaks like the difluoromethyl group and double halogenation didn’t spring fully formed from theory—they came after rounds of failure and careful bench work. This makes a difference for anyone watching the next generation of syntheses or product launches. Whether the aim is pest control, medicinal leads, or specialty coatings, having a reliable, well-designed base makes other advances possible.
Production-scale chemistry introduces its own headaches. Process teams want scalable syntheses with as few steps and hazardous intermediates as possible. The avoidance of finicky protective groups or hyper-reactive intermediates here shortens the journey from research vials to real containers. The less time spent stabilizing and purifying, the more manageable the cost and safety profile for all involved. Industry feedback shows increasing value placed on synthetic neatness—less waste, more sustainability, easier compliance.
Adopters also keep their eyes open for integration with existing equipment. Reports from formulation plants point to smoother adoption with this compound, citing improved flow characteristics and fewer blockages in automated systems. Every time a process shift results in less downtime or more predictable outputs, industries save money and reduce risk. Having seen the headaches that follow clumping or inconsistent product delivery, I know firsthand how these features translate to smoother day-to-day operations.
Discussions about chemical innovation cannot dodge the environmental and health responsibilities at stake. Whether used in agriculture or potential pharmaceutical projects, substances with lower risk for runoff, leaching, and unintended toxicity bring obvious public interest benefits. Many in the field want reassurance that each step, from synthesis through to end-of-life, reflects both scientific rigor and broader responsibility.
To that end, industry insiders highlight lower rates of environmental persistence and rapid conversion to non-toxic by-products as key wins. Ongoing monitoring includes field runoff analysis, groundwater testing, and systematic residue checks on harvested crops or treated surfaces. The latest research suggests compounds closely related to 1-(5-Amino-2,4-Dichlorophenyl)-4-Difluoromethyl-3-Methyl-1H-1,2,4-Triazol-5-One achieve lower long-term impact—crucial for meeting regulations and maintaining public trust.
Breakthroughs like this seldom come from solo effort. Teams in industry, academia, and regulation trade findings and setbacks, each round of iteration feeding the next. Open data on environmental fate, residue studies, and synthetic modifications help drive continual refinement. I learned early on that sharing “failed” experiments can often inform someone else’s next breakthrough, streamlining the collective path forward.
Trade conferences over the past few years have buzzed about difluoromethyl-triazolone chemistry. Many conversations focus on the balance between chemical innovation and operational simplicity. This compound’s tangible performance gains in both the lab and the field keep it on radars for further investigation and broader rollout. Everyday users—farm managers, plant operators, quality control chemists—report actual improvements rather than just theoretical merits. These voices, grounded in real use, often push companies to invest further in compounds like this one.
Every innovation brings a mix of excitement and necessary skepticism. No molecule solves every challenge, yet 1-(5-Amino-2,4-Dichlorophenyl)-4-Difluoromethyl-3-Methyl-1H-1,2,4-Triazol-5-One lands in the promising territory between safety, stability, and targeted activity. Peers in the agricultural field share stories of reduced re-spraying, tighter harvest intervals, and improved resistance profiles when testing similar molecules. Medicinal chemists, meanwhile, follow up with comparative charts of enzyme inhibition and metabolic resilience.
Even with praise, ongoing surveillance means routine screening for new metabolites, checking for unanticipated side effects, and responding swiftly to field feedback. Collaboration between regulatory bodies, research labs, and field users forms the backbone of responsible adoption and ongoing improvement.
Success depends on building systems that reward thoughtful design and responsible follow-up. For developers, this means advancing complementary formulations, sharing results transparently, and resisting shortcuts on environmental assessments. In my experience, the best-performing molecules enjoy uptake not from marketing flash, but from a grounded track record: consistent yields, fewer headaches at the blender or tank, and clean audits through the compliance pipeline.
Next steps focus on embedding these new chemicals within integrated management systems. Laboratories can examine interactions with older active ingredients, ensuring no surprises in tank mixes or foliage spraying. Regulatory teams will keep pressing for longer-term residue data, metabolic mapping, and by-product profiling.
Public support for modern chemistry projects—whether for agriculture, health, or materials—follows when results speak plainly and risks are managed. By continuing to share real-world findings, staying honest about setbacks, and designing every process with both field and environment in mind, new products like 1-(5-Amino-2,4-Dichlorophenyl)-4-Difluoromethyl-3-Methyl-1H-1,2,4-Triazol-5-One can lift industries forward without losing public confidence or ethical grounding.