Tracing the use of Tripropylene Glycol Methyl Ether takes us back to times when basic solvents carried the production of coatings, inks, and cleaners. As factories pounded out products in the late 20th century, the need for a versatile, fast-evaporating glycol ether became obvious. Chemical companies kept their labs busy, hunting for a formula that balanced solvency with manageable toxicity—something that could clean, dissolve, and mix without causing more trouble. Around this search, TPM gained traction, stepping in to prop up both heavy industry and crafts. Having worked in maintenance in a printing house, I remember the industry buzz each time a safer, more efficient solvent hit the supply chain. TPM arrived with promises that it could outperform old favorites without sending workers to occupational health. It didn’t eliminate every hazard, but it raised the floor for safety and reliability, giving the industry a solvent it could count on for tough jobs without the worry from more notorious chemicals.
Tripropylene Glycol Methyl Ether stands out because it straddles the line between strength and subtlety. It’s made up of a family of isomers—so in plain terms, it isn’t a single substance but a group of closely-related molecules. Its clear liquid form flows with low viscosity, blending readily with water and hydrophobic compounds. You notice its mild, almost sweet smell in the workshop, a reminder that fumes linger but do not overpower the senses like toluene or xylene. Its boiling point sits higher than many straight-chain glycol ethers, letting manufacturers push temperatures further when needed. That means fewer panic moments with flashing hazard lights during production runs. Workers can count on TPM to do its job without too many surprises—no drama with rusted valves or sticky residues. The solvent keeps coatings workable and inks printable, fitting seamlessly into high-speed production lines.
Labels and technical data sheets swamp plant offices, filled with dense language on specific gravity, flash points, and concentration limits. People in the field focus on the real questions: How does TPM handle under heat, in closed systems, or exposed to air? Its mid-range vapor pressure reduces volatile losses, which means jobs last longer before reapplication. TPM meets common labeling under systems like GHS and OSHA, but practical safety comes from daily routines—keeping spills away from drains, wearing gloves, running ventilation, storing drums away from heat and sunlight. Production teams tune their setups for TPM’s strengths, adjusting blend ratios or process times to get the most out of every barrel. Consistency matters, since changing solvents can throw a wrench into everything from curing rates to print clarity.
Industrial chemists generally prepare TPM by reacting methyl ethers with tripropylene glycol across carefully controlled catalysts and temperatures. The process weeds out unwanted byproducts, but keeping it clean demands monitoring—a lesson learned from years spent on plant floors watching as small tweaks in pressure or feedstock purity send yields up or down. Companies guard their recipes closely, so most outsiders see only the final product, not the proprietary methods. Supply chain hiccups remind us that efficient, reproducible synthesis supports smooth operations elsewhere. Each drum of TPM out of spec means unpredictable reactions, customer complaints, and extra hassle. Those working in upstream chemical processing know the stakes, as entire production schedules ride on reliable, high-purity output.
In the hands of researchers and product engineers, TPM isn’t just a solvent. It becomes a building block. Laboratories demonstrate TPM’s versatility, reacting it with acids or bases, or transforming it to ester or urethane derivatives. These tweaks yield performance improvements in coatings, cleaners, printing fluids, and adhesives. The appetite for custom reactions grows as products demand tighter specifications—higher durability, better stain resistance, faster drying times. I’ve seen R&D teams chase slight formula changes for weeks just to squeeze a few more percentage points out of performance tests. TPM’s chemical backbone gives formulators room to experiment, meet cutthroat timelines, and answer customer complaints by adapting quickly. Many competitors envy that flexibility, especially as regulatory pressures pin down older, more hazardous solvents.
You walk through distribution warehouses or check procurement systems and run into TPm’s other monikers: 3-[2-(2-Methoxypropoxy)-1-methylethoxy]propane, or sometimes just Triproplene Glycol Methyl Ether. Even suppliers use shorthand or proprietary tags, which creates headaches for buyers and safety coordinators. The muddle of synonyms proves frustrating—workers get instructions for “TPM” one day, “DOWANOL TPM” the next, even though they pull the same drum off the shelf. Companies try to standardize these names across teams to cut confusion, tying safety data sheets to every possible name TPM goes by. On the job, clarity isn’t just about safety—mistaking one glycol ether for another can ruin a batch, spark a work stoppage, or trigger a costly disposal order. Clear product identity makes more difference than some folks realize.
TPM has a reputation as a less toxic alternative to some classic solvents, but relaxed attitudes invite trouble. I’ve watched injuries happen when seasoned operators let their guard down, assuming TPM’s mild odour and liquid feel mean it poses less risk. The main threats come through skin and inhalation—prolonged exposure triggers irritation, headaches, or respiratory symptoms. Many plants lock down TPM storage with secondary containment, tight-fitting PPE, and constant training refreshers. Long hours with the stuff still add up. I once noticed a new team member handle a minor spill without gloves; policy said gloves were mandatory, but routine often trumps written rules. Keeping eyes on daily practices often says more about operational safety than a dozen audits. Industrial sites that blend strong safety culture with smart chemical handling see the fewest incidents and can keep insurance and regulatory headaches at bay.
It’s rare to find a modern factory or laboratory untouched by glycol ethers. TPM’s sweet spot falls in coatings, printing inks, paint strippers, and other specialty cleaners. In those circles, it offers balanced evaporation and solvency—fast enough to clean surfaces or transfer pigments, but stable enough to avoid fire and fume complaints. Think of TPM bolstering flexographic inks for labels or smoothing out the application of two-part epoxy coatings on steel. Small-scale artisans and global manufacturers both count on TPM as a workhorse, rolling it into everything from floor finish removers to degreasing compounds. Consumer products teams like its odor profile, as formulations geared for home use demand less offensive smells. TPM rarely gets headlines, but it stands behind the products consumers use every day. If you’ve ever enjoyed a streak-free glass cleaner or watched painted surfaces keep their sheen under stress, there’s a good chance TPM helped.
Research teams have set out to understand TPM’s wider health and environmental effects, as scrutiny around solvents only tightens. Initial animal studies gave TPM a relatively clean bill of health—low acute toxicity, modest risks under normal exposure, but worries linger about long-term effects and cumulative exposure. As a hands-on manager, I’ve sat in on safety briefings where toxicologists debated everything from dermal absorption rates to synergistic effects when TPM mixes with other solvents. The industry sometimes drags its heels, but the push for full transparency has forced deeper toxicity studies. Universities and commercial labs work around the clock, chasing answers to how TPM interacts with both human health and ecosystems. This open-ended curiosity matters; cutting corners on basic science leads to bigger messes down the line.
Solvents face an uncertain road. Demand isn’t about to vanish, but both consumers and regulators demand safer alternatives, greener production, and bio-based feedstocks. TPM, often seen as a “safer” glycol ether, faces competition from upstart chemicals pitched as non-toxic, plant-derived, or even biodegradable. Making the switch won’t be quick—long qualification cycles, regulatory approvals, and performance trials stack up when production lines are on the line. But companies know the clock is ticking. Conversations in technical meetings always circle back to “What next?” and “How soon can we blend new grades with old stock?” Researchers look for tweaks to TPM’s structure to squeeze more value—from faster drying coatings to lower toxicity inks—without ditching what works. In this fast-moving space, complacency counts as defeat. I’ve seen businesses stumble by betting too heavily on solvents with short shelf lives, regulatory or otherwise. The winners usually keep one eye on today’s orders, another on tomorrow’s potential breakthroughs.
Walk through any construction site or manufacturing floor and you’ll probably find cans or tanks containing TPM—or products made possible by it. TPM steps up as a key ingredient in paints and coatings. Manufacturers use it as a slow-evaporating solvent. Paints level out more evenly, which means fewer brush marks and a better finish. People who work with coatings and inks value TPM for this reason; it makes their jobs easier and the results more consistent.
TPM also helps control the drying time. Quick-drying paint can look blotchy, especially in heat or wind. TPM lets painters achieve a smooth coat, and it gives them extra minutes to fix drips or overlaps. From old-school rollers to factory spray lines, TPM gets pulled in wherever quality finishes matter.
Printing shops rely on TPM for more than just its solvency. TPM keeps inks fluid in the press—there’s less clogging and clogging leads straight to downtime and lost money. TPM breaks up stubborn residues in cleaning solutions, too. If you’ve ever had to scrub inked rollers clean, you’ll welcome anything that saves elbow grease. TPM dissolves dried-on colors without harsh fumes, making cleaning less of a headache.
I’ve seen TPM surface again and again in electronics. If you look behind the scenes, semiconductor and display plants lean on TPM for cleaning and photoresist removal. It handles delicate tasks that harsh chemicals can’t. Without TPM, tiny circuits would be much harder to keep clean, and yield rates could drop. Every chip found in smartphones or laptops today depends, in some small way, on specialty chemicals like TPM.
TPM finds its way into commercial and household cleaners, especially for hard surfaces or floors. It softens stubborn grime, which means less scrubbing for janitors and homeowners. Its low odor and mild nature matter—cleaners containing TPM are easier to use in closed spaces. That’s important for worker health, and anyone who’s ever mopped a poorly ventilated hallway can vouch for this benefit.
Some cosmetic and personal care products take advantage of TPM’s safety profile and mildness. TPM helps dissolve fragrances or actives in liquid soap and lotions. Formulators look for solvents that don’t irritate skin, and TPM offers a balance between effectiveness and gentleness.
On the industrial side, TPM helps process resins, adhesives, and even some types of hydraulic fluids. Companies favor it for its stability and low toxicity. It works well in closed-loop setups, so there’s less waste and environmental impact over time.
People now pay extra attention to what goes into products—both for safety and environmental reasons. TPM has a good track record for low toxicity. Still, regulators keep an eye on solvent emissions, especially in big urban settings. Companies have started to recycle TPM in their operations, which reduces emissions and saves costs. Treating waste streams properly keeps TPM out of water and air, which lines up with tighter environmental standards.
Safer workplaces and smarter handling practices have pushed the industry to use solvents like TPM more responsibly. Training workers and using better ventilation systems go a long way toward reducing risk. TPM’s role today is one of balance—delivering performance, but with an eye on worker health and sustainability.
People in labs, factories, and various industries have worked with TPM, or Trimethylolpropane, for decades. The compound keeps showing up in manufacturing paints, coatings, and even plastics for everyday items. Some might wonder about the hidden dangers, considering how often we hear about risks with chemicals we use or touch.
TPM appears in workplaces more than most folks realize. Factory floors can smell faintly sweet in spots where workers mix coatings. In my experience at a small manufacturing plant, TPM arrived in large drums, clearly labeled and always stored out of the way. Labels stressed care: splash-resistant gloves, safety goggles, no exceptions. Sometimes, workers new to the plant tried skipping gloves. After a stern warning from an old-timer about irritated skin, everyone followed protocol.
The safety record for TPM looks solid on paper, especially when comparing it to solvents or harsher chemicals. It's not explosive or highly flammable. Even so, it’s no hand lotion. Contact with skin leads to dryness, redness, or in rare cases, a rash. One time, I spilled a little on my hand during cleanup. The sensation felt tacky, followed by mild itching, and that ended after a quick rinse at the eyewash station. Inhalation isn't as big a threat as with some chemicals, but standing over an open drum for too long can lead to headaches or dizziness.
Animal studies show TPM has low toxicity. Health and safety datasheets prepared by respected organizations back this up. Regulatory agencies around the world list TPM as safe with standard protective measures. The CDC and OSHA assign it to categories where gloves, goggles, and good ventilation provide enough protection. Long-term cancer or reproductive effects have not been linked to normal use.
Accidents happen more often from carelessness than from innate danger with TPM. Once, a friend at a paint shop skipped protective eyewear out of habit. TPM splashed during a routine transfer. He spent the afternoon at the clinic with eye discomfort, but he recovered fully. Mislabeling or improper storage has caused more serious incidents elsewhere—imagine TPM stored next to food products in a break room fridge.
Environmental spills do raise alarms. Workers, wildlife, and local water systems can all end up exposed if a large amount spills outdoors. Quick cleanup and correct disposal remain essential. Emergency plans and regular drills make all the difference, as many in the industry have learned after minor incidents.
Rules make sense: use gloves, goggles, aprons. Ventilate workspaces. Wash hands after handling. Every training session I attended stressed these habits, and supervisors checked for gaps. Easy access to safety showers and spill kits means emergencies get handled right away instead of too late. Regularly updating Material Safety Data Sheets ensures everyone understands current risks and understands what actions to take during accidents.
Some plants now use automatic mixing and closed systems to lower human contact with TPM. That cuts down accidental splashes and inhalation risks. Labels stay bold and clear so nobody mistakes TPM for harmless water or cleaning products. New workers sit through training before touching containers or working near them.
Trust gets built layer by layer in places where people handle chemicals. Regular reminders about protocols mean that risks stay manageable. Personal experience tells me that once habits slip, accidents will catch up. With TPM, safe handling isn’t complicated—and that keeps workplaces healthier, products high in quality, and communities safe from unnecessary harm.
TPM stands for Trimethylolpropane. Chemists write its formula as C6H14O3. This molecule gets attention in labs, workshops, and factory floors because of its usefulness, not because it’s flashy. TPM stacks up as a building block for things like polyester resins, coatings, polyurethanes, and lubricants. The core reason — it brings three hydroxyl (-OH) groups and a backbone tough enough to handle heat and solvents.
TPM doesn’t draw much visual notice — it’s a colorless, chunky crystalline solid at room temperature. Pick it up, and the texture falls somewhere between gritty table sugar and soft paraffin wax. Touching it often, even with gloves, gives you an uncanny sense of how it can shift from solid to syrupy if temperatures rise. That puts melting point around 56-59°C, which lines up with reliable chemical handbooks.
Its faint, sweet odor isn’t overwhelming. You won’t find TPM wafting through labs like acetone or ammonia. Drop a chunk in water, and you see it dissolve without fuss, thanks to those three friendly hydroxyl groups grabbing onto water molecules. TPM also mixes well with alcohols and ethers, which makes it blend right in during chemical manufacturing.
The molecule weighs in at about 134 grams per mole. Layman translations: not too hefty, not super light. Because it shows such a mild vapor pressure even when heated, TPM doesn’t vanish into the air during most industrial processes. For workers, this proves less of a worry for breathing hazards compared to volatile solvents.
I’ve learned from years around labs and industrial settings that understanding compounds like TPM helps prevent hassles — both in product quality and workplace safety. Many coatings owe their scratch resistance and smooth finish to TPM. Without precision in handling melting point, you might get half-melted, sticky messes clogging pipes. Knowledge of its solubility means fewer clogs in machinery and safer cleanup; I’ve watched teams shave hours off production downtime just because they know which solvent gets TPM out of equipment fastest.
Explosion risks tend to lurk in factories, but TPM doesn’t burn like lighter alcohols or solvents. Its flash point sits above 180°C. That wide safety margin reduces odds of surprise fires, so both facility planners and insurers breathe a bit easier. Still, I’ve seen how a thick layer of dust — even from TPM — can create its own fire risk. Regular housekeeping, following standard safety rules, brings those odds down, and this makes management sleep better.
TPM’s resilience against oxidation stands out, especially when making durable plastics or stable lubricants. Set this next to glycerol, and you notice TPM’s smaller tendency to pick up water from the air. This translates to less stickiness in finished plastics — something end users spot right away when they unwrap electronic gear or medical devices.
Few people outside industrial circles talk much about TPM, but quality-minded manufacturers won’t drop it from their recipe books. Well-prepared teams keep data on melting and boiling points handy, follow protective guidelines, and call vendors who provide pure batches. I’ve seen supply chain headaches smooth out when buyers check before delivery for off-spec crystals or odd humidity levels inside shipping cartons. Chemists and health officers who audit their processes — even yearly — stay ahead of both product recalls and regulatory fines.
Nothing beats hands-on experience with physical handling of chemicals. TPM isn’t the flashiest, most dangerous, or most mysterious compound out there, but getting the basics right on materials like this means smoother workdays, safer teams, and better projects down the line.
Anyone working with TPM—also known as Trimethylolpropane—will recognize that proper storage and transport stand at the core of safety, reliability, and product quality. Open any chemistry or manufacturing safety manual and you’ll see whole sections warning against careless handling. Years spent on the plant floor taught me this is not empty talk. Fumes, leaks, and contaminated drums aren’t just dangerous—they cost money, time, and sometimes credibility.
TPM serves in resins, lubricants, coatings, and plastics. It’s a stable polyol, and a solid at room temperature. But every chemical, no matter how stable, reacts to its environment. Water can spoil it, heat can change its properties, air can oxidize. Contaminated raw material rarely delivers the results you need in downstream manufacturing. Once, I watched a team lose an entire batch of specialized resin because some TPM spent a few days near a leaky steam pipe. Ruined product, expensive downtime.
TPM stores best in hardy, sealed containers—think steel drums with airtight lids or dedicated plastic bins. Temperature plays a big role. Most manuals mention below 30°C as a safe limit. I always kept drums in shaded warehouses or climate-controlled rooms. Once temperatures push above the safe mark, you risk changes in viscosity and maybe even a slow buildup of degradation products. Any warehouse operator knows the headaches caused by sweating drums and caked polyols.
Water in the storage area turns into a hidden enemy. Humidity creeps in through faulty seals and leaves behind unwanted by-products in TPM. Regular inspections help, and most plants I’ve worked at set up weekly drum checks—surface rust, dents, and seal integrity. Taking short cuts on this step led to far more trouble than what it “saved” in time.
Moving TPM demands the same attention. Drums go on pallets, shrink-wrapped, and strapped tight. Floors stay dry and free of leaks. Pallet damage or rough loading sends shockwaves down the supply chain: a dented drum can mean weeks lost while replacements are sourced and paperwork sorted. I’ve seen logistics teams run quick visual checks at every loading dock and it paid off tenfold in lost-product reductions.
Haulage fleets sometimes struggle with high summer heat or cold snaps. Long-haul shipments do best in insulated containers if trucking routes take them through extreme temperatures. Good record-keeping along the route matters. Receivers always check for temperature excursions on arrival, and often refuse the shipment or run fresh batch quality tests before use if any reading falls out of range.
Regulations and standards exist to protect workers and products. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) give specific guidelines for labeling, compatibility, and secondary containment. Labels need to be clear, storage racking robust, and emergency spill kits available near every storage area. Any gap in compliance risks not only safety but also business and legal headaches.
Training forms the backbone. Workers who handle TPM must recognize both bodily risk and business impact. Annual refreshers, written SOPs, and live demonstrations reinforce a culture of safety. Whenever I trained younger workers, I always linked every step to real-world stories—not just the rulebook. That’s how knowledge becomes habit.
Few facilities run perfectly, but risks drop sharply where solid practices exist. Automation—like barcode tracking or IoT sensors for temperature—makes oversight easier. Modern systems can send alerts for rising heat or humidity in storage areas, stopping small problems from turning big.
Manufacturers who prioritize these simple steps rarely face major shipment rejections or safety breaches. For anyone handling TPM, small investments in proper storage and careful transport keep people safe and businesses trusted.
TPM (trimethylolpropane) shows up often in conversation around chemical manufacturing. This chemical gets plenty of attention because industries rely on it. Manufacturers use TPM to make resins, coatings, lubricants, and plastic products. People rarely hear about it outside those circles, but its impact reaches much further than a single factory floor.
Large-scale chemical operations using TPM raise questions about runoff, air quality, and ecosystems. Highly processed environments always generate some waste, and chemicals rarely stay exactly where people want them. Studies on chemicals in the same family as TPM show some can end up in soil or water, where they might stay for years. This kind of persistence catches the attention of ecologists, especially when aquatic life suffers. Reports have tracked certain byproducts from resin plants that can work their way into rivers and streams, and TPM fits right in with these compounds.
Beyond water, air emissions create even more attention. People living downwind from a plant can pick up odors from chemical tanks or catch volatile compounds in their everyday air. State agencies in the US require manufacturers to keep emissions under strict thresholds for this reason. Firefighters and environmental cleanup crews keep close tabs on storage areas, since spills or leaks can cause widespread damage in a short amount of time.
Studies on TPM’s direct health impact stay limited compared to its industrial brothers. Long-term exposure at high levels sometimes irritates eyes and skin, based on lab tests. Breathing in contaminated air causes headaches or dizziness for some workers. Factory safety data sheets make it clear: handle with gloves, wear goggles, and keep the area well ventilated. In industries that use TPM every day, workers share stories about itchy skin or nosebleeds after poor ventilation or spills. Chronic or accidental exposure still needs more research, but the warnings loom large for the people who handle it.
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has published guidance about TPM and chemicals like it. Acute toxicity seems low, but no parent or nurse would say that makes it safe for kids or pregnant women. Lack of extensive long-term studies doesn’t mean an all-clear—just that health risks might be slow to show up.
Communities near chemical plants don’t always get a say in what happens in their backyard. Anyone who’s lived near a big industrial area knows the smell in the air or the sheen on storm drains. I’ve seen neighborhoods where garden vegetables struggle, and the local creek looks cloudier year after year. Residents speak up at town meetings, sometimes pushing industry leaders to test well water or reduce emissions. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) occasionally steps in after accidents, but local vigilance matters most.
Some positive steps come from direct community advocacy, such as independent air monitoring or citizen science projects. Families banding together to request transparency make a clear difference. Better labeling, stronger personal protection rules, and regular health monitoring at work all help people feel safer around TPM.
Better storage, spill response drills, and water testing after storms all support cleaner handling. Worker training programs focused on chemical safety make a real-world impact—it only takes one mistaken pour or faulty valve to cause disaster. Strict government oversight and tougher safety policies help, and plenty of companies now look into substitutes or green chemistry solutions as alternatives to traditional compounds like TPM.
The risks from TPM shouldn’t be ignored, but they aren’t unsolvable. We need more open reporting about local air or water quality, and more investment in research on long-term health impacts. Pushing for clear labels, community access to data, and collaboration between industry and neighborhoods will go a long way toward keeping people and the planet healthier.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | 1-methoxy-2-(2-methoxypropoxy)propane |
| Other names |
1-Methoxy-2-(2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy)propane TPM Tripropylene glycol monomethyl ether Methoxylated tripropylene glycol 3-[2-(2-Methoxy-1-methylethoxy)-1-methylethoxy]-1-methoxypropane |
| Pronunciation | /traɪˈprɒpɪliːn ˈɡlaɪˌkəʊl ˈmiːθəl ˈiːθər/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 25498-49-1 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1201087 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:89697 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1687860 |
| ChemSpider | 5093 |
| DrugBank | DB14106 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 14fa46d7-495a-4e81-9cc9-3e7e8b1744e7 |
| EC Number | 248-317-7 |
| Gmelin Reference | 104032 |
| KEGG | C19615 |
| MeSH | D013114 |
| PubChem CID | 82193 |
| RTECS number | UZ2995000 |
| UNII | Y3M627B39Z |
| UN number | UN3092 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID6020603 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C10H22O4 |
| Molar mass | 190.27 g/mol |
| Appearance | Clear, colorless liquid |
| Odor | Mild ether-like |
| Density | 0.951 g/cm³ at 25°C |
| Solubility in water | Miscible |
| log P | 0.56 |
| Vapor pressure | 0.02 mmHg @ 20°C |
| Acidity (pKa) | ~15.7 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 7.7 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -7.54×10⁻⁶ cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.419 |
| Viscosity | 3.7 cP (25°C) |
| Dipole moment | 3.67 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 385.7 J/mol·K |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -622.7 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -4816 kJ/mol |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | D02AX |
| Hazards | |
| GHS labelling | GHS02, GHS07 |
| Pictograms | GHS02, GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Precautionary statements | P210, P233, P240, P241, P242, P243, P261, P271, P280, P303+P361+P353, P304+P340, P305+P351+P338, P312, P337+P313, P370+P378, P403+P235, P501 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-1-0 |
| Flash point | Flash point: 100°C |
| Autoignition temperature | 215°C |
| Explosive limits | 1.1-10.6% |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 Oral Rat 3,296 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | TDLo (rat oral): 3,200 mg/kg |
| NIOSH | RN 25498-49-1 |
| PEL (Permissible) | 100 ppm |
| REL (Recommended) | 50 ppm |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Diethylene Glycol Methyl Ether (DEGMEE) Propylene Glycol Methyl Ether (PM) Dipropylene Glycol Methyl Ether (DPM) Tripropylene Glycol (TPG) Tripropylene Glycol Monomethyl Ether Acetate (TPMA) Ethylene Glycol Methyl Ether (EGME) |