© 2026 Sinochem Nanjing Corporation,
All Right Reserved
THPC has been around for decades, but not everyone outside of specialty chemical circles appreciates its impact. Synthesized in the early 20th century, this chemical punched above its weight in industrial circles, emerging as a tool for textile treatment right around the time fire safety finally started to matter in everyday consumer goods. Back then, cotton and other fabrics caught fire without a second thought, and THPC offered a real-world answer. Over the years, researchers kept refining the synthesis process, trying to make the molecule more stable and less risky to handle. Those efforts turned a relatively obscure compound into a backbone for flame retardant chemistry, especially in the textile and wood treatment fields. Real progress happened as regulatory agencies began mandating tougher fire-safety standards, and the industry, led by scientists who knew the risks and benefits firsthand, pushed towards large-scale, reliable THPC manufacture.
People working with specialty chemicals need to know what they’re handling. THPC looks like a colorless to pale yellow liquid, sometimes a crystalline solid, depending on storage and concentration. The smell is tough to miss, sharp and a bit like formaldehyde, which tracks since the chemical comes out of a reaction between phosphine and formaldehyde in the presence of hydrochloric acid. Chemically, its formula — C4H12ClO4P — underscores how much phosphorus and formaldehyde are wrapped up in its structure. Since the introduction of THPC, manufacturers and safety officers learned that the substance reacts quickly with oxidizers and acids, calling for careful storage and transport. Unlike some industrial chemicals that fade into the background, THPC sticks out in the memory of anyone who’s ever worked in a fire-risk environment.
The most practical thing I picked up handling THPC involved its water solubility. Everyone from lab techs to production managers relies on this feature, because it dissolves easily — critical for industrial treatment processes. The hydrophilic nature means quick absorption into natural fibers, helping boost fire retardancy. THPC also decomposes when heated too much or kept in storage too long, producing formaldehyde gas and other breakdown products. It can be volatile, so temperature control remains essential. If you ask a seasoned chemist, they’ll talk about the substance’s reactivity, the importance of keeping acids and bases away, and the need for well-maintained containers. Even the Transportation Department recognizes that shipping THPC means strict adherence to hazardous goods protocols.
In practice, technical specs guide every shipment and every batch that crosses factory floors or research labs. Industry workers examine concentration by percentage, acidity with pH meters, and look for absence of contamination — because even trace metals or particulates can throw off textile finishing lines or fire retardant preparation. Sample labels show not just chemical names but hazard symbols, precautionary statements, and directions for safe handling. Regulatory agencies like OSHA in the United States and the European Chemicals Agency in the EU put their weight behind strict labeling, knowing that even a diluted spill calls for immediate remedial action. A regular safety brief on my team always involved the latest labels—no one wanted confusion in an emergency.
Books and manuals describe the classic method using phosphine gas bubbled through a solution of formaldehyde with hydrochloric acid as catalyst. The reaction doesn’t require exotic tools, but strict ventilation matters every step of the way. Workers monitor temperature carefully to minimize by-products and make sure the final solution remains clear and stable. End users rely on suppliers who stick to best practices here, since impurities affect how THPC works in end-use applications. Entry-level chemists can handle the procedure with oversight, though experienced operators know to pay extra attention to pressure buildup and to keep the workspace free from any open flames due to the high flammability and potential for hazardous gas release.
THPC's value goes up as soon as chemists start reacting it with other chemicals. Probably the best-known modification transforms it into tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium sulfate (THPS), which shifts the application mix to water treatment and oil fields. Reacting THPC with ammonia produces polyphosphonates that bind to cotton and keep fabrics from igniting. These reactions create more than just safer products — they drive innovation in fire retardant technology and broaden the chemical’s appeal. At every stage, researchers keep a close eye on by-products, since even small amounts of formaldehyde or hydrogen chloride released during reactions mean more work for safety officers and environmental managers. I’ve seen companies spend years investing in processes that cut down these side reactions, not only for cleaner products, but to sidestep expensive compliance issues.
THPC shows up under several synonyms in technical literature and trade. Students and seasoned chemists might stumble across names like THPC, Tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium chloride, or just phosphonium salt, depending on the manufacturer. These shifts in terminology reflect market history and evolving safety standards. A textile plant or water treatment facility might order the same base material under several trade labels, yet the critical reference for anyone in health and safety remains the underlying chemical identity. I’ve found it helps to cross-check product documentation, especially since global trade sometimes brings in chemicals labeled according to older nomenclature, leading to headaches if containers go unrecognized in a busy storeroom.
No one working with THPC enjoys taking shortcuts when it comes to safety. The compound’s toxicity profile demands gloves, splash-proof goggles, and robust ventilation. Inhalation or skin exposure can mean trouble; documented cases report skin irritation, respiratory distress, and even severe reactions after careless handling. In my experience, training sessions for THPC include a review of proper storage—sealed containers, secondary containment, and ready access to neutralizing agents. Regulatory guidance calls for prompt labeling and clear emergency plans. I remember drills in my early lab days where each member practiced cleanup scenarios, since old stories of THPC incidents drive home the need for vigilance. Ventilation systems must pull air away from operators, and spill kits with absorbent pads sit right by the storage shelves.
The biggest calling card for THPC lies in textiles and flame retardant finishes on fabrics found in everything from children’s pajamas to upholstery on public transport. The quest to keep flammable cotton from wreaking havoc pushed THPC to the front of the line among industrial fire retardants. The compound’s ability to bind to natural fibers made it popular for decades in commercial laundering and finishing operations. In time, the chemical found footholds in water treatment, leather processing, and even paper manufacturing, riding on its knack for boosting both safety and performance. The oil and gas industry also found its use in corrosion inhibitors, especially after modifications that tweak the base molecule. Chemical companies and research labs keep looking for added value, expanding THPC’s horizon beyond clothing into technical textiles and specialty coatings designed to withstand harsh environments.
Academic teams and industrial R&D centers focus on squeezing more performance out of THPC while trying to lower its environmental impact. In recent years, research shifted to synthesizing derivatives that cut down on hazardous by-products and exploring blends with newer, less toxic fire retardants. Teams worldwide look at the long-term environmental footprint, because authorities and customers demand more sustainable manufacturing and lower toxicity. I’ve met researchers set on creating THPC alternatives with less formaldehyde release or easier breakdown in nature, knowing that future regulations will set tough benchmarks. Collaborative projects span materials science, toxicology, and green chemistry, and graduate students often find their first hands-on industrial projects tasked with tackling open challenges tied to THPC processing.
Toxicologists point out that THPC isn’t benign, especially if mishandled. Studies show acute toxicity risks after inhalation or direct contact with eyes and skin. Chronic exposure links back to respiratory ailments and dermatitis, raising questions around long-term exposure in industrial settings. Animal studies underpin much of the safety data, but worker experience often shapes policy, as reports surfaced from poorly ventilated plants. The possibility of formaldehyde release — itself a known carcinogen — keeps occupational health departments on alert. Current research works to pin down exposure thresholds and explores more robust personal protection measures. Calls to revise permissible exposure limits pop up at industrial safety conferences, driven by field incidents and fresh insights from health monitoring campaigns.
THPC’s role in industry stands at a crossroads. On the one hand, its effectiveness as a fire retardant sets a high bar for safer, more sustainable chemicals. Researchers, regulators, and companies share a stake in finding replacements or upgraded derivatives as global standards tighten. The pace of new antiflammability standards means that THPC and related compounds must evolve or get sidelined. Whether through greener synthesis routes, hybrid materials, or bio-based alternatives, the future will likely see THPC adapted in ways that cut back on toxicity and boost safety. Key players invest in lifecycle analysis, hoping to keep up with a marketplace and regulatory landscape that cares more about health and environmental stewardship than ever. Whoever cracks the code on safer and greener fire retardancy will shape not just tomorrow’s products but public trust in the chemical industry.
Tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium chloride, or THPC, doesn’t come up around dinner tables, but plenty of the things you touch on a regular basis rely on it. I remember visiting a textile plant in my early twenties, walking past row after row of cotton fabric. The foreman, sleeves rolled up, rattled off how they treated the cloth to keep it safe from flaming up too fast. That’s where THPC made its mark. Factories use it as a flame-retardant for textiles, especially in places where public safety matters – think hospital curtains, hotel bedding, and uniforms.
Fire safety gets most of the attention, and for good reason. Statistics show that treated materials mean fewer deadly accidents. The US Consumer Product Safety Commission points out how finishing fabrics with THPC based-compounds keeps fire risks down. I’ve seen that hesitation in people’s faces, wondering if chemicals like these do more harm than good. Plenty of debate circles around the environmental load and long-term health impacts. It feels uncomfortable watching news stories that highlight poor handling in some plants, but regulation and updated practices aim to keep those issues in check. Within regulated limits, THPC offers proven performance for public safety – that’s not something to brush off lightly.
Other corners of industry have found their own uses for this stuff. Water treatment comes to mind. I remember talking to a city engineer who explained how certain bacteria can get out of control in municipal water lines. THPC acts as a biocide, helping to knock back those tiny threats. The EPA lists phosphorus-based biocides like this one as effective – they break down well and reduce the burden on the wider water system.
In oilfields, I learned that THPC keeps pipelines clearer. Oil industry friends have shown me how unchecked microbial growth leads to “souring” in oil reservoirs, leading to expensive and sometimes dangerous damage. Regular treatments limit that risk. I’ve seen ranchers use treated water for their livestock, counting on THPC to keep their animals safe from bacteria, so the thread runs through more parts of life than most people imagine.
Stories pop up about worker safety in chemical plants and runoff into rivers. In my own experience, proper handling matters as much as the product itself. Good ventilation, protective equipment, and responsible waste management make a big difference. I’ve had neighbors raise concerns about phosphate chemicals entering soil, worrying about crops and water safety. Industry reviews from bodies like the European Chemicals Agency stress regular monitoring and public reporting. Pressure from groups like Greenpeace keeps the spotlight on transparency. Community watchdogs have a role – open data lets concerned folks see progress or problems for themselves.
Some labs look for greener options, but, right now, many sectors keep using THPC because it gets the job done. Engineers and scientists don’t ignore the downsides – every few years, you see a push for refinement, whether through improved application methods or alternatives with fewer environmental costs. From my years covering environmental science, substituting one chemical for another never lands as a quick fix. It takes trial, new investment, and often shifting regulations. For now, THPC sits at the intersection of need and caution.
Understanding THPC means tracing its trail through fields, waters, and fabrics. Keeping people safe, stopping fires, and protecting water lines carries real importance. Manufacturers, researchers, and regulators share the responsibility to make sure short-term gains don’t build up into long-term harm. As with any chemical, transparency and continual improvement offer a path forward—one that remains shaped by science, oversight, and the communities that live alongside industry.
Most people outside the lab won’t recognize the name Tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium chloride—THPC. In certain industries, though, this chemical plays a big role. THPC helps with textile flame retardancy and pops up in resin and paper applications. People who handle it every day often wonder, “Just how risky is this stuff?”
After years working with industrial chemicals, I’ve seen well-designed workplaces where THPC stays locked up tight. This material can irritate skin and eyes upon contact. Inhalation of dust or fumes doesn’t do the lungs any favors, either. Its liquid form can corrode metals and break down with heat, releasing potentially hazardous gases. It’s not the same as more notorious toxins, but that doesn’t mean it deserves casual handling.
Released test data show acute oral toxicity in animals at relatively low levels (LD50 values near 400 mg/kg). Human reports detail eye burns, rashes, and some respiratory irritation—all linked to unprotected spills or poor ventilation. These stories didn’t come from textbooks but from actual factory and laboratory incidents, many involving crew who thought gloves and goggles were optional. Even a small splash in the wrong spot can set off a painful lesson.
Safe handling doesn’t need cutting-edge equipment. What works is consistency and discipline. Chemists I’ve worked with always reach for nitrile gloves and chemical splash goggles. Lightweight lab coats or coveralls keep sleeves and pant legs protected in case of splatters. I keep a large jug of clean water near the workbench in case someone needs a fast rinse—speed matters if THPC gets on skin.
One company I visited avoids accidental inhalation by using fume hoods or exhaust fans. Employees work with small batches; large storage drums stay outside main production rooms. Any open transfer happens with double-checks and a spill kit on standby. OSHA and EU regulations stress these steps and require clear labeling and secure storage. Some manufacturers switched over from glass to thick-walled plastics or lined drums to prevent accidental corrosion and leaks.
I once saw a new technician splatter THPC during a rushed transfer. She wasn’t wearing goggles. The accident led to hours in a medical clinic and weeks of eye recovery. That one oversight spurred the company to install eye wash stations at every door. Posters and regular drills followed, reinforcing simple habits: gloves first, goggles second, don’t rush. Nobody likes the sting of a chemical mishap, especially one you could have avoided.
Beyond everyday protective gear, training makes a real difference. Employees deserve to know what’s in their bottles and how to react during a spill. Digital learning or hands-on refreshers keep lessons sharp. Managers must check that storage spaces stay cool and airtight, and that every drum gets a clear hazard label. In my own practice, I keep spill absorbents and neutralizing agents on-hand; these let a team tackle minor accidents without emergency calls.
Accidents drop when everyone stays vigilant and respects the chemical’s risks. THPC, like so many industrial materials, won’t cause problems if people give it the careful handling it clearly demands.
THPC doesn’t make headlines like plastics or batteries do, but it finds its way into a surprising number of industries. Let’s cut through the jargon: THPC stands for Tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium chloride. In plain terms, it’s a compound born from blending phosphorus chemistry with a few handfuls of formaldehyde and hydrochloric acid. This combination gives it a chemical formula of C4H12ClO4P. That’s four carbons, a dozen hydrogens, one chlorine, four oxygens, and a single phosphorus atom.
Chemistry never shies from the math. For THPC, the molecular weight comes out at 238.57 grams per mole. People working in textiles, water treatment, or the paper industry might see that figure on shipping manifests or safety sheets. That weight isn’t just trivia for the lab—it affects shipping costs, how much is needed for a batch, and even how the chemical spreads, dissolves, and reacts during production. That number means real money, time, and sometimes, safety.
It’s worth sharing that THPC pops up everywhere, even in stuff nobody thinks about. Fire retardants lean on it to slow the burn rate of materials we trust for home safety. Certain resins and wrinkle-resistant fabrics wouldn’t act the same without it. Some water plants add it to keep water cleaner or tackle metal ions that ride along in pipes. I’ve seen engineers on factory floors measure it by the drum, not realizing that handling even familiar compounds requires good training and respect for safety protocols. This isn’t just a spreadsheet entry—it matters to people on the job every day.
As much as folks like to look at formulas on paper, the impact lands in daily life. THPC works by latching onto natural fibers like cotton, making it harder for flames to catch hold. That’s great for fire safety, but mishandling the substance comes with risks—skin and eye irritation and, in big enough doses, trouble for the respiratory system. Several studies indicate that exposure limits need to be taken seriously, as repeated contact builds up health hazards for workers. Gloves, masks, and clear signage—these aren’t just bureaucratic details. They keep people clocking into work safe and returning home just as healthy.
Some folks in manufacturing want safer alternatives. Green chemistry initiatives focus on swapping out chemicals with tough safety profiles for eco-friendlier picks. Still, THPC sticks around because it performs a trick not easily replaced in terms of cost and reliability. Companies focused on sustainability now look for better waste handling, recycling, or even new catalytic processes that make less hazardous byproducts. Training on chemical literacy helps, but there’s still plenty of room for smarter monitoring and less hazardous substitutes.
The chemical formula and weight of THPC aren’t just to satisfy a high school test. They shape production choices, supply chain math, and even the shape of regulations and daily safety routines. Understanding these numbers and what they mean keeps projects on track and people out of harm’s way. Everyone from lab scientists to floor workers deserves tools and information that treat these decisions as more than a footnote in a binder. Smart, simple clarity about chemicals like THPC pays off, every day and everywhere it’s used.
Tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium chloride, often called THPC, plays a role in fire retardants and water treatment. The chemical offers plenty of value, but the moment people in the lab or factory hear its name, there’s worry in the air—handle it wrong and a small mistake grows big in a hurry. Anyone who’s had irritation from THPC on their skin can tell you: this is no sugar water.
I once found a half-open bottle of THPC stashed away in a back corner of a lab shelf, sticky and starting to crystallize at the cap. That scene tells a story about neglect. This stuff pulls in water from the air quick. Let it sit open, and the liquid gets thicker; over time, the packaging leaks, putting workers and expensive equipment at risk. Moisture triggers both chemical degradation and the chance of spills. Glass bottles or high-grade plastic containers with strong sealing caps make a difference here. Don’t just screw the lid back on halfway—people need to check for a tight fit before storing away.
Heat makes things worse. THPC stays most stable at cooler, but not freezing, temperatures. Storage areas should be dry—so, not next to a water line or under AC vents. I remember an old basement lab with levels that bounced up and down every summer, and even locked cabinets couldn’t save chemicals from gradual breakdown. In larger plants, the best spot for THPC sits away from heat sources, sunlight, and places where airflow brings in extra humidity. Temperature control in a chemical storage room sometimes costs money, but compare that to the price of managing a chemical leak or fire—and the decision becomes pretty clear.
Walking through any reputable facility, you’ll spot bold signage on chemical shelves. Labels shouldn’t just name the chemical; they must include the hazard warnings and handling instructions. Rushed workers cut corners, but the most dangerous spills I’ve seen started with an unlabeled bottle or faded warnings. Anyone reaching for THPC has to know right away that it could irritate skin, eyes, lungs, and isn’t something you rinse down a drain. Training new hires to respect labels and double-check containers goes a long way to keeping everyone safe.
A problem with hazardous chemicals grows faster if emergency planning gets ignored. Facilities that handle THPC keep chemical spill kits, eyewash stations, and showers nearby. My own routine has always been to map out exits and fill out emergency contact sheets before starting on any project that needs this substance. If something goes wrong—and over a long enough timeline, it usually does—having quick access to these tools cuts injuries and loss. The law supports this mindset; most government inspections focus first on whether proper safety gear stands ready and workers know where to find it.
THPC waste can’t go in a regular trash bin or down a nearby sink. Factories and laboratories must follow local rules for collecting and disposing of chemical waste. Regular audits make sense—not just to avoid citations, but because one surprise leak can bring a whole operation to a halt. Cleanup kits, absorbent pads designed for chemicals, proper gloves, and splash goggles all belong in the same area as storage, not locked away in a distant storeroom.
Taking these steps shows real respect for both the chemical and the people working around it. Carelessness with storage shortens the lifespan of THPC and can lead to bigger, costlier problems. Each safety measure in place comes from long experience—often from mistakes others have made before.
Mention THPC—Tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium chloride—to anyone working with fire-resistant fabrics, and the connection appears clear. THPC plays a vital part in flame retardant finishing. In factories where cotton fabric rolls off the loom, THPC goes straight into the treatment baths. It bonds tightly with fibers, changing the fabric’s chemistry so it resists burning. Anyone who’s ever worried about children’s pajamas or work uniforms burning too easily can appreciate the protection that THPC provides.
A 2022 report from the National Fire Protection Association highlights the scarcity of tragic outcomes thanks to these finished textiles. Manufacturing standards have raised the bar for safety, and THPC helped shape those rules. The chemistry makes sense: phosphorous-based flame retardants like THPC interrupt the burning cycle at the molecular level. This gives everyone a little more time if a fire ever breaks out.
Leather tanners run into mold and rot problems whenever moisture shows up. THPC enters the scene as a fungicide for leather treatment. Most folks prefer leather that lasts, and this chemical keeps mildew at bay, boosting both durability and shelf life. Lower levels of waste translate to less environmental strain from spoiled hides.
This application cuts costs, allows manufacturers to expand their market reach, and provides a better product for the end user. One of the largest tanneries in Europe recently reported a double-digit drop in returned leather goods due to rot once THPC became standard in their treatments. This isn’t just economics; it’s common sense in practice.
Water treatment facilities use THPC too—this time to take care of bacteria and fungi lurking in large-scale cooling systems. Industrial water lines clog up fast without the right chemicals. THPC slashes that risk and helps operators avoid the costs of replacing clogged pipes and filters. Workers clean less, maintenance drops, and production lines keep moving.
Researchers at several environmental organizations note the balance here. The world faces tight water quality regulations. Using antispoiling agents that work at lower concentrations means chemical discharge remains below troublesome levels. Less harm to ecosystems shows a smarter choice for both industry and the environment.
Oil fields face serious challenges from microorganisms in drilling operations. Without biocides like THPC, bacteria grow inside pipes and tanks. This growth blocks flow, corrodes metal, and reduces yield. THPC slips into the drilling fluid, stopping the spread of these troublemakers and protecting expensive equipment.
Oil professionals point out the savings add up quickly. Fewer shutdowns and less need for pipe replacement means safer, faster projects and less environmental damage from unexpected leaks.
THPC brings safety and efficiency, but it doesn’t come without concerns. Long-term exposure raises questions about user health and water pollution. Industry watchdogs want more transparency about how much THPC leaves a factory or interacts with the environment. Some research teams are developing new blends that keep the benefits but break down faster in soil or water.
Factories adopting better containment and recycling systems help a lot here. Focusing on tighter limits and quick spill response makes the industry safer. Supporting innovation means the chemical sector can keep the gains and trim away the risks tied to older approaches.
The spotlight remains on THPC’s performance, but real progress comes from smarter use, more open data, and pushing for solutions that respect both people and the places where they live.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium chloride |
| Other names |
THPC Tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium chloride Tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium chloride solution Tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium chloride (THPC) Phosphonium, tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)-, chloride Curox Fyrol 50 |
| Pronunciation | /ˌtɛtrəˈkɪsˌhaɪˌdrɒksɪˈmɛθɪl fəˈsfəʊniəm ˈklɔːraɪd/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 124-64-1 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1718732 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:38240 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1166577 |
| ChemSpider | 167394 |
| DrugBank | DB11302 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03bcd598-0e54-4bd7-b9a5-92ddb8bd3d8e |
| EC Number | 262-647-8 |
| Gmelin Reference | 82248 |
| KEGG | C11938 |
| MeSH | D011493 |
| PubChem CID | 6579 |
| RTECS number | TZ7875000 |
| UNII | 6YQ3Q8V66Q |
| UN number | UN2834 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID8031544 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C4H12ClO4P |
| Molar mass | 137.52 g/mol |
| Appearance | Colorless to pale yellow transparent liquid |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.2 g/cm3 |
| Solubility in water | soluble |
| log P | -3.9 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Acidity (pKa) | 4.5 |
| Basicity (pKb) | pKb ≈ 5.5 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | Diamagnetic |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.470 |
| Viscosity | 20-35 cP (25 °C) |
| Dipole moment | 4.75 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 322.5 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -321.8 kJ/mol |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | D08AX |
| Hazards | |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, GHS05 |
| Pictograms | GHS05,GHS06 |
| Signal word | Danger |
| Hazard statements | H290, H314, H373, H411 |
| Precautionary statements | P260, P264, P270, P271, P273, P280, P301+P330+P331, P302+P352, P304+P340, P305+P351+P338, P310, P312, P321, P330, P363, P391, P403+P233, P405, P501 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-0-2-W |
| Flash point | >100°C |
| Autoignition temperature | 220 °C (428 °F; 493 K) |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 Oral - rat - 632 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (oral, rat): 632 mg/kg |
| NIOSH | WN0175000 |
| PEL (Permissible) | PEL: 0.1 mg/m³ |
| REL (Recommended) | 0.5-1 ppm |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | 250 mg/m³ |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium sulfate (THPS) Tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium bromide Trimethylphosphine Phosphine Phosphonium chloride |
