© 2026 Sinochem Nanjing Corporation,
All Right Reserved
Isopropyl Myristate, sometimes referred to by its chemical formula C17H34O2, and Isopropyl Tetradecanoate, often noted as C17H34O2, stand as popular esters in the world of raw materials, widely favored for their texture, spreadability, and compatibility with skin. Created by reacting isopropyl alcohol with either myristic acid or tetradecanoic acid, these compounds offer a straightforward carbon chain structure with an ester linkage that lends both to a light feel and fast absorption on the skin, making them staples in personal care, pharma, and cosmetics formulations.
Both Isopropyl Myristate and Isopropyl Tetradecanoate often show up in lotions, creams, deodorants, and even makeup removers, working as emollients, solvents, or carriers for other active ingredients. My personal brush with these compounds came years ago while working in topical product formulation; attempting to balance that silky texture without the greasy finish led me back, time and again, to Isopropyl Myristate’s lightweight, almost invisible finish. This isn’t just cosmetic—a well-formulated skin cream has to avoid buildup while ensuring active molecules reach their target in the skin, something the molecular design of these ingredients helps facilitate.
Looking at a bottle of Isopropyl Myristate or Isopropyl Tetradecanoate, you’ll notice a clear liquid with hardly any odor—a little surprising considering its fatty acid source. These molecules typically appear as colorless liquids at room temperature but can turn into crystals or even semi-solid material below certain temperatures. Their density sits around 0.85-0.87 g/cm³, so they weigh less than water. Isopropyl Myristate melts at about -5°C and boils around 167°C at 5 mm Hg, while Isopropyl Tetradecanoate lands in a similar region thanks to its structural resemblance. Both carry the molecular weight of 270.45 g/mol. Take it from anyone who’s spilled these in the lab: they spread fast, seep into materials, and can make a benchtop slick in no time.
In supply chains, Isopropyl Myristate and Isopropyl Tetradecanoate usually come as clear liquids. Occasionally, lower temperatures will encourage the formation of crystals or flakes. Powders or “pearls” almost never appear in standard shipments, but some polymer blends might use modified forms for specific manufacturing needs. Measuring out a liter of this material in a process line, the oil-like consistency stands out compared to heavier, stickier cosmetic bases. Consistency can shift with minor changes in temperature or storage, so any facility working with these ingredients needs strict controls to keep them within specification.
For customs and global sourcing, the Harmonized System Code for Isopropyl Myristate often falls under 2915.90.0070, classified as “esters of fatty acids” and Isopropyl Tetradecanoate aligns with similar codes depending on regional categorization. From a safety perspective, both materials are not labeled as hazardous under most global chemical regulations. That said, I’ve watched colleagues handle spilled product carelessly and spend the afternoon slipping through the lab—not due to acute toxicity, but because the material’s slipperiness causes real issues. Safety data sheets advise avoiding eye or skin contact in concentrated form, and proper ventilation matters if handling large volumes. Even though these materials aren’t acutely harmful, repeated skin exposure can cause mild irritation, especially for those with sensitive skin or allergies.
Every chemical—even the ones found in everyday personal care—requires smart, respectful handling. Isopropyl Myristate and Isopropyl Tetradecanoate don’t rank as hazardous in the way strong acids or toxic solvents do, but both can present challenges if spilled or improperly disposed of. In the event that a large quantity enters a waterway, for example, emulsification and potential harm to aquatic life might occur over time, though both materials biodegrade at a moderate rate. Only a few times have I seen workers treated for mild skin or eye irritation, and in those cases, quick rinsing and basic first aid solved the problem. Regulatory authorities recommend keeping these compounds off the ground and out of drain systems, storing them in tightly closed containers, and using safety goggles and gloves for bulk handling.
The reason formulators keep returning to Isopropyl Myristate and Isopropyl Tetradecanoate lies in their compatibility with a wide range of ingredients. Their molecular backbone makes it easy to solubilize active molecules, dissolve flavor or fragrance compounds, and enhance barrier properties of creams and lotions. They create a pleasing, non-sticky finish that rivals cyclomethicone and other synthetics, which helps personal care brands move toward greener, more skin-friendly ingredient lists. In practice, anyone designing topical products has probably felt frustrated by options that feel heavy or leave residue until turning to these esters for smoother, lighter blends that actually work on real skin.
Current industry efforts focus on greener sourcing and better lifecycle analysis for common cosmetic ingredients. Since Isopropyl Myristate and Isopropyl Tetradecanoate are baselines in hundreds of formulas, switching to sustainable palm-free sourcing or exploring alternatives derived from upcycled oils has become a real topic of discussion in technical circles. Brands committed to reducing their environmental footprint are asking suppliers for more transparency, documented traceability, and proof of fair labor practices in upstream production. On a practical level, end users and handlers can reduce environmental impact by following safe release guidelines and choosing packaging that fits the logistical realities of transport and storage. Teams managing large stockpiles should stay updated with local regulations and the ever-evolving standards on chemical handling and environmental safety.
