© 2026 Sinochem Nanjing Corporation,
All Right Reserved
Stepping back a few decades, chemists started exploring organotin compounds for their versatility and reactivity, especially in fields like agriculture and organic synthesis. The quest for selective antifouling agents and stable catalysts pushed researchers to look past the basics. Among many compounds to emerge from that surge, tris(cyclohexyl)-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)tin arrived as something that straddled both imagination and chemical practicality. Scientists saw its multi-ring system and thought about how it could function as a building block in polymerization or act as a ligand in coordination chemistry. The history hasn’t always played out in broad headlines, but in specialized journals and industry reports, the compound’s promise began to take shape. Looking at patents and academic literature from the 1990s onward, the drive for more sophisticated organotin agents was unmistakeable, shaped by both regulatory pressure and technical ambition.
Chemists built tris(cyclohexyl)-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)tin from a backbone that’s equal parts robust and flexible. Three cyclohexyl groups encircle the triazolyl-tin core, producing both steric bulk and possibilities for modifying electronic properties. Unlike some more infamous cousins in the organotin world, this molecule aims for specialty roles that demand reliability over raw power. Its properties make it most attractive as a custom additive, running far from high-volume shelf chemicals that often cut corners for cost savings. Anyone curious about where modern tin chemistry is going finds this substance both familiar in structure and open-ended in application.
In practice, tris(cyclohexyl)-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)tin behaves like you'd expect from a heavily substituted organotin. It forms a stable, low-melting solid that resists decomposition under normal storage and handling. Many organotins are notorious for their strong, sometimes offensive odors and their unfortunate toxicity profiles. The triazole ligands help rein in some of that volatility, though thoughtful handling still matters. The presence of three cyclohexyl rings gives it substantial hydrophobic character. In the lab, this means it doesn’t dissolve well in water, sticking instead to organic solvents like toluene and ether. It can withstand moderate heat without breaking down quickly, but it doesn’t take kindly to strong acids or oxidants. The molecule’s bulk also prevents close packing in solid state, lowering its melting point compared to simpler organotins and allowing for easier manipulation and dosing in formulations.
Getting tris(cyclohexyl)-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)tin in pure form often means working with small batches, high-purity solvents, and careful chromatographic separation. Chemists label it according to IUPAC standards, trace impurities to the part-per-million, and catalogue its storage requirements with unusual care. Specifications hinge on keeping the organotin moiety intact. It’s a compound that asks for and rewards purity because even minor by-products can undermine downstream processes. Most labels warn about organometallic toxicity, with clear guidance for glove and goggle use, even for seasoned hands. More than once, I’ve fished an ambiguous bottle from the back of a lab shelf and double-checked the hand-written warning, knowing the risks tied to such compounds.
Building tris(cyclohexyl)-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)tin typically begins with cyclohexylhydrazine, triazole, and a reactive tin(IV) chloride or tin(IV) alkyl precursor. The synthesis rarely lends itself to step-saving shortcuts; refluxing and slow additions dominate, and inert atmospheres cover all operations from first drop to final filtration. Unreacted tin chloride or leftover organics require painstaking scrubbing or extraction with solvents that don’t attack the target compound. Purification takes time and glassware, using column chromatography or slow crystallization to achieve usable batches. Chemists with experience in organotin synthesis know how tricky it can be to control stoichiometry, and even small deviations can produce stubborn side products that carry over into later applications.
Unlike tin compounds made for sheer reactivity, tris(cyclohexyl)-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)tin takes a subtler path through chemistry. Its triazole ligands anchor the tin, lending both steric protection and opportunities for selective substitution. In my own lab work, I’ve watched substituted triazoles modulate the compound’s behavior—adding electron-withdrawing groups often dials up resistance against oxidation, while electron-donating groups open up different routes for functionalization. It doesn’t just accept modifications quietly; it encourages experimentation around changing reactivity, with modern organometallic researchers eager to try new reactions. Cross-coupling and exchange reactions let chemists append a variety of small molecules, all while keeping the heart of the structure intact.
Chemists often work across borders and eras, so names travel along with the science. Tris(cyclohexyl)-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)tin pops up under synonyms drawn from systematic and trivial name conventions. Strict IUPAC names aside, names like “tris(cyclohexyltriazolyl)tin” or simply “cyhex-triazole tin” appear in specialty catalogs and citations. Knowing alternate names cuts down on confusion when moving between patents, journal articles, and material safety documents. The most important thing is keeping these synonyms tied back to accurate molecular structures and properties—a lesson hammered home in labs where one wrong bottle reaches for the wrong purpose.
Anyone handling organotin compounds knows the importance of safety standards. Tris(cyclohexyl)-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)tin is no exception. Good practice involves full gloves, eye protection, and working in ventilated fume hoods—no shortcuts. Chronic exposure data for many organotins call for special attention to spills, and disposal must respect both local regulations and a healthy respect for the compound’s persistence. Some researchers I know speak plainly about headaches or discomfort after careless exposure in graduate days; it’s the sort of experience that shapes how future generations treat organotins. Storing it separate from oxidizers and acids protects both the worker and the product, and labeling remains clear and unmistakable, to warn those who come later.
This compound hasn’t gone commercial on a grand scale, but it carves out roles where specialty tin compounds rule. For example, it pops up as a tailoring agent in high-performance organometallic catalysts and attaches to surfaces in anti-corrosive coatings for industrial equipment. In academic settings, it appears in coordination chemistry research, bridging the gap between simple ligands and bulky, highly protective scaffolds that let researchers probe new metal-ligand interactions. Some synthetic protocols use its controlled reactivity in selective transformations, especially where the combination of steric bulk and electronic modulation gives a distinct advantage. Unlike commodity tin agents, its uses stay close to the researcher’s bench, where performance trumps price.
Research on tris(cyclohexyl)-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)tin circles around improving both its preparation and discovering new types of reactivity. Scholar articles highlight ongoing work aimed at tuning its triazole substituents, chasing after unique electronic and steric effects. Chemists in academic and industrial settings alike look for ways to plug the compound into newer, greener synthesis strategies, including recyclable catalysts and less hazardous reaction conditions. At international chemistry conferences, I’ve overheard spirited debates about the merits of bulky triazole ligands and watched as new derivatives hit the preprint servers months before full publication. The sense of ongoing innovation is real and rooted in practical challenges—how to make the compound more accessible, how to reduce the creation of stubborn by-products, how to broaden the range of metals and reagents that can cooperate with the tin-triazole core.
One of the persistent shadows in organotin chemistry is the question of toxicity—both to humans and to the environment. Tris(cyclohexyl)-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)tin inherits some risks common to its class: skin and eye irritation, risks of organ damage after prolonged exposure, and environmental persistence. Ongoing toxicology studies measure its acute and chronic effects in cell cultures, but more often, regulatory bodies request data on aquatic toxicity and potential bioaccumulation. Researchers try to balance the compound’s benefits with a clear-eyed assessment of its risks. My own reading of the literature suggests a slow but steady push toward modifications that could reduce toxicity or at least provide simple, effective mitigation measures during use and disposal. Safety never ranks as a mere afterthought; many teams put it front and center in new project designs.
Looking years ahead, tris(cyclohexyl)-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)tin could find expanded niches in both green chemistry and materials science, but only if researchers keep addressing its production cost, reactivity range, and safety profile. Sustainable chemistry programs might broaden its appeal, especially as chemists demand catalytic systems that both perform well and resist decomposition under conditions that frustrate less robust molecules. If greener and safer preparation methods take hold, the compound could enter new industrial applications in coatings, polymers, or specialty adhesives. Regulatory scrutiny, especially around organotin toxicity, will shape what comes next, whether through outright restrictions or a steady tightening of permissible uses. The goal, as always, remains to squeeze the most out of chemical innovation while keeping an honest appraisal of risks and rewards. My expectation is that as new tools and computational models unfold in the coming years, this substance, like many specialty organotins, will both surprise and challenge the chemists drawn to master its unique possibilities.
Tris(Cyclohexyl)-1,2,4-Triazol-1-Yl)Tin sounds like a mouthful, but in the field of crop protection, it’s a game-changer. Many farmers count on chemicals like this to fight off stubborn threats that wipe out harvests. Fungal diseases hit crops hard, and the active tin compound here blocks these fungi at their source, minimizing crop loss. People working the fields don’t have the luxury of trial and error. They aim for solutions that drive real results, and this compound consistently performs in the right hands.
Research points to measurable success in wheat, barley, and other staples. Farmers facing down powdery mildew see noticeably healthier crops after using triazole-based formulas. Tris(Cyclohexyl)-1,2,4-Triazol-1-Yl)Tin fits into this group. By inhibiting fungal sterol biosynthesis, it halts the spread of disease right in its tracks. The agricultural sector worries about resistance, though, so constant monitoring remains necessary. Recent studies suggest that careful rotation of active ingredients — and keeping up with recommended dosages — goes a long way toward extending the compound's usefulness.
Public demand for safe food and a cleaner planet keeps growing. It drives companies and researchers to study alternatives and control environmental impact. Tris(Cyclohexyl)-1,2,4-Triazol-1-Yl)Tin, like other organotin agents, works well but raises questions about persistence in soil and toxicity to aquatic life. Many regulations call for lower residue limits. Countries like Germany, France, and Japan all keep close tabs on organotin use.
The search for balance between high yields and sustainability motivates reforms. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) encourages a lineup of cultural, biological, and selective chemical methods. With IPM, Tris(Cyclohexyl)-1,2,4-Triazol-1-Yl)Tin often lands as a last defense, not a go-to crutch. This approach protects beneficial insects and limits contamination. Bringing these perspectives into practical farming helps keep harmful residues out of waterways and food supply chains. From my own experience sampling soil runoff in river valley farms, trace amounts show up far less often when farmers rotate compounds and reduce frequency of use. Real progress comes when policy and boots on the ground meet halfway.
Beyond farming, organotin compounds find work in specialty plastics and coatings. Manufacturers have tinkered with Tris(Cyclohexyl)-1,2,4-Triazol-1-Yl)Tin as a stabilizer or additive to fight fungi in flexible materials. In humid climates, coatings treated with antifungals last longer and save businesses replacement costs. Quality assurance matters here, since mishandling or overuse risks leaching into the environment. Plant operators in the chemical industry often swap notes about handling and safe storage, with a strong culture of safety training. Regular audits and waste management protocols play a major part in keeping things running smoothly — a lesson I learned firsthand working in industrial QA years ago.
Tris(Cyclohexyl)-1,2,4-Triazol-1-Yl)Tin appeals because it solves immediate problems, whether in food security or protecting materials. Still, regulations tighten year after year. It’s up to both manufacturers and end users — from industrial chemists to the average grower — to take up smarter application techniques and invest in alternatives when possible. Real-world results depend on controlled usage and transparency about risks. Current EU guidelines enforce strict labeling and application procedures, and local training programs make a difference in keeping workers and their surroundings protected. By building a strong feedback loop between farmers, scientists, and regulators, practical solutions emerge that serve everyone’s best interests.
Every compound tucked away on a warehouse shelf, in a laboratory refrigerator, or sitting in a storeroom faces a ticking clock. Not every product makes it to its end date with the same punch it had on day one. I’ve spent years working with pharmaceuticals and industrial chemicals, and one thing always rings true—ignore storage guidelines and stable molecules turn unreliable almost overnight.
Stable chemicals keep their intended structure without breaking down, reacting, or producing impurities. Even if a product batch meets quality benchmarks at the factory, plenty can erode its value before it ever sees use. Oxygen in the air finds weak bonds fast. Humidity seeps through plastic, glass, and cardboard, leading to hydrolysis. Direct sunlight speeds up photodegradation, breaking apart sensitive ingredients.
Take ascorbic acid, a staple in over-the-counter supplements. Leave it on a bathroom counter with the cap off, and potency drops like a rock. Tightly closed and cool, it hangs on for months. These aren’t just chemistry textbook warnings—they’re deviations we spot in real world stability testing.
Manufacturers print shelf life on the box based on data from stress tests. These numbers assume ideal storage: certain temperature, low moisture, no sunlight, and tightly sealed containers. Most compounds hate fluctuation. In pharmaceutical work, even a two-week summer warehouse heat wave sent samples out of specification. Anyone storing or selling chemicals should log temperatures and audit stock now and then—I’ve caught expired material that was technically “in date,” but obviously degraded. Smell, color, or visible clumping all signal trouble.
Over time, I’ve seen small daily habits stretch the lifespan of important chemicals. Staff trained to re-cap bottles tightly, stash volatile solvents in metal cans, and record waste keep losses low. Simple labeling with opening dates heads off mistakes and waste. These steps don’t require PhDs or fancy technology—just consistency.
Distributors and end users have responsibility, too. I’ve seen pharmacies leave blister packs near radiators and factories place palletized chemicals in humid corners. Forget scientific jargon; just respect the limits spelled out in storage instructions and keep routine checks in place.
Many companies now invest in temperature and humidity loggers with automatic alerts. Even small businesses can set up these low-cost monitors and catch problems before they snowball. Regular on-site audits sniff out irregularities, flag questionable batches, and prevent risky compounds from hitting the field or customer hands. Working with suppliers who package in high-barrier materials pays off, even if the price is a little higher.
If a compound performs a role where safety can’t slip—like medicines or food preservatives—it’s better to plan for shorter shelf life and faster turnover. Never stretch use because the sticker says it’s still good. The lesson sticks: chemistry punishes shortcuts, but rewards attention to detail and respect for simple instructions.
Handling chemicals like Tris(Cyclohexyl)-1,2,4-Triazol-1-Yl)Tin does not just mean donning gloves and moving on. I’ve spent enough time in labs to know that each compound brings its own personality—some might just stain your lab coat, some could blow up a beaker, and others leave damage invisible but dangerous. This particular organotin compound definitely falls in the “don’t take it lightly” category.
Every organotin deserves deep respect. These are potent compounds, often toxic to aquatic life and known for their potential to harm the liver, kidneys, and nervous system with even small exposures. Eyes, skin, or lungs—they all become doors for danger if this substance escapes. I’ve seen careless storage result in hospital visits and environmental messes, so nobody should treat this stuff as an ordinary lab supply. Chronic skin rash, persistent cough, or worse could be waiting around the corner if spilled or inhaled.
Temperature swings, sunlight, and moisture can turn Tris(Cyclohexyl)-1,2,4-Triazol-1-Yl)Tin unstable, so the smallest details in storage matter. A cool, dry spot with steady conditions helps. Forget makeshift shelves—this material belongs in a tightly sealed, clearly labeled container made from a material compatible with strong organotins. I make sure secondary containment is not skipped; too many accidents start with a cracked or upended bottle. No food, no drinks, and no ordinary household fridges—ever.
Access should remain restricted to folks who actually understand the risks and have proper gear on hand. I keep a running log of what I bring in and what goes out, so no surprises ten years down the line. Safety cabinets rated for toxic substances give the extra insurance the team and building deserve. Spills become far less likely and easier to control in a dedicated spot, away from open drains or messy work surfaces.
Experience tells me PPE goes beyond the basics. Nitrile gloves, long sleeves, and a well-fit respirator do more than spare your skin or lungs—they shape your mindset about risk. A simple splash says more about lab culture than any safety poster on the wall. Chemical fume hoods aren’t optional for this job. They pull dangerous vapors away and put a new layer between you and a major problem.
Before even breaking a seal, I check spill kits and eyewash stations. It looks like routine, but just one mistake wakes everyone up fast. Clean hands before and after every handling step, and never let your guard down just because the job is “routine.”
I’ve met too many folks who shrug and say, “It won’t happen to me.” That approach never lasts. Any exposure gets immediate attention. Eyes? Rinse with water, straight to the emergency room. Skin? Soap, water, doctor. Inhalation? Leave the area, breathe fresh air, call for help. Nobody wastes time in emergencies. Spills demand a clear path and a ready team—not just whoever happens to be nearby. Emergency plans aren’t just for show; they get used for the sake of everyone sharing the building.
Disposal steps weigh equally. Pouring leftovers down drains never counts, and every single container goes into proper hazardous waste bins. Tracing the journey of every gram from delivery to disposal isn’t overkill—regulations demand it, and accidents prove why. Nobody wants to see a warning sign in the news about contaminated water. Protecting each other and the planet looks like care now, and it pays off later, too.
Tris(Cyclohexyl)-1,2,4-Triazol-1-Yl)Tin doesn’t pop up in everyday conversation, but it matters in a handful of specialty chemical applications. Imagine a lustrous, crystalline compound that hardly looks dangerous at first glance. I’ve learned over the years that the most unremarkable-looking substances on the shelf can pack some sneaky risks. This compound, used as a catalyst in certain syntheses, brings plenty of muscle to sensitive chemical reactions. The same reactivity that makes it valuable also means it demands respect in handling.
Chemists who deal with organotin compounds like this one often wind up repeating the same warning: Don’t underestimate toxicity just because you don’t see immediate symptoms. These tin-based chemicals have a history of harming both the user and their surroundings if ignored. Reports link organotins to neurotoxicity and immune suppression. Skin contact leads to irritation, sometimes burns, and fumes can hit lungs and eyes with a stinging force. Accidental ingestion—though rare in a lab where everyone wears gloves—brings real danger if compounds like this slip past safety barriers.
Experience taught me the value of checking and double-checking every PPE item before popping the container open. Proper gloves—nitrile or even better, butyl rubber—form the frontline. Safety goggles keep splashes from turning into a trip to the emergency room. Respirators with particulate filters do more than collect dust; they keep lungs clear when powders rise, especially in enclosed labs. Fume hoods act as a trusted partner, sucking away airborne risks. A well-maintained eyewash and shower nearby offer comfort because, in a pinch, seconds save eyesight and skin.
Ask a few old-timers, and you’ll get a chorus about proper storage. This tin compound can’t just sit next to food or acids. I organize it away from open flames and moisture to cut down on fire and toxic decomposition products. Moisture, even slight, creates triazole vapors and tin oxides, never something you want in the air. Clean up small spills with absorbent pads, avoiding sweepers or vacuums that stir up clouds of danger. Double-bagging waste and labeling it for hazardous pickup isn’t just bureaucratic red tape—it’s how the next shift avoids a painful surprise.
The story of compounds like this one goes beyond the lab. Tin pollution found in water near manufacturing plants has left real marks, harming aquatic life and communities relying on clean supplies. It reinforces something I’ve always believed: safety in handling isn’t only personal. It means making sure neighbors, animals, and local soil don’t inherit your risks. Getting rid of leftover compound means following hazardous waste guidelines, not washing it down a drain for convenience. That lesson came to me from a stern but wise mentor who’d seen environmental trouble up close.
Care means more than following checklists. Sharing safety know-how, holding refreshers, and taking accident drills seriously can change the outcome for everyone. Regular air monitoring, surprisingly easy with modern tools, gives early warning of exposure before symptoms show. Investing in quality PPE pays for itself the first time a spill or splash happens. I’ve seen teams that treat safety as a point of pride stay healthy and productive, no matter how exotic their reagents get. That’s the way forward—respect the compound, mind the risks, and keep an eye on the bigger picture beyond today’s bench work.
Ask anyone who's ordered a specialty organotin compound like Tris(Cyclohexyl)-1,2,4-Triazol-1-Yl)Tin, and they’ll instantly mention purity specs. Quality here is no checkbox—it's a necessity. I remember cracking open a naive online supplier listing once, marveling at the wide range in stated purity. You’ll see most catalogs mention a figure in the 96%-99% range. That’s decent for most R&D work, but the devil lives in the details.
Contaminants pose real problems with organometallics. Even a 1% mystery impurity can shift reactivity or wreck yields. Unreacted starting material, byproducts from cyclohexyl or triazole sources, or oxidized tin products sneak in if quality control takes a back seat. Reputable suppliers like Sigma or Strem always support those 96-99% purity claims with a solid COA. I’ve seen their specs list max chloride, sulfate, or iron content—often capped at 0.01%—plus melting point or NMR spectra for confirmation.
Lab workers lean hard on the data sheets. A company once sent me a batch that looked fine until we checked by ICP-MS and found stray sodium above the stated 100 ppm cutoff. Trust in a supply chain can erode fast. Purity by HPLC or NMR is common, but smart users also watch for trace metals. Not every catalog product gives full analytical profiles, which tells you plenty about the seller. Technical-grade products, with purities closer to 92-94%, find use in larger-scale industrial trials—never for high-stakes research.
This compound likes stability if dry and cool, but exposure to air or moisture triggers hydrolysis—raising the impurity load. Those handling organotin derivatives know how even minor impurities speed up decomposition or produce stubborn residues. Keeping a close eye on shelf-life dates and storage conditions becomes part of daily routine for most chemists.
In Europe and North America, REACH and TSCA rules push for tighter control on all organotin shipments. I've had to submit batch numbers and full analytical records to regulatory affairs teams, especially when the chemical ends up in specialty polymers or coatings. The chips are down when broader environmental or toxicity claims arise—a reminder that users and producers each carry the trust of the supply chain.
Researchers and formulators do themselves a favor by sticking to sources with a history of documentation and analytical transparency. I once picked up on a supplier’s quality by asking pointed questions—what’s the water content, how is the NMR spectrum checked, are certificates routinely updated? Answers arrived fast from the best. Shopping on price alone often leads to headaches, delays, or waste management costs from out-of-spec shipments.
Building relationships with suppliers helps. Some labs now buy smaller batches more frequently, reducing storage risks. Automated monitoring using GC-MS and real-time batch scanning streamlines the process and keeps both bench chemists and regulatory inspectors happy. Technology plays a larger role than ever in safeguarding standards, not just ticking off boxes on a standard checklist.
Trust in a chemical’s specifications can make or break a project. My experience says that asking the tough questions before the PO gets issued saves time, cost, and reputation. Behind every purity label lies a story—of methodology, of corporate ethics, of a lab’s workflow staying afloat or falling apart. For Tris(Cyclohexyl)-1,2,4-Triazol-1-Yl)Tin, those lessons matter every day.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | tris(cyclohexyl)(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)stannane |
| Other names |
Tri(cyclohexyl)-1,2,4-triazolylstannane Tricyclohexyl(1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)stannane Tricyclohexyl(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)tin tris(cyclohexyl)-1,2,4-triazolylstannane |
| Pronunciation | /traɪsˌsaɪ.kləˈhɛk.sɪl ˌwaɪˌtuːˌfɔː ˈtraɪ.ə.zɒl ˈwʌn ɪl tɪn/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 132682-74-1 |
| Beilstein Reference | 3464165 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:33497 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL460478 |
| ChemSpider | 17694658 |
| DrugBank | DB12773 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03fc0e27-cde4-4fb7-8c85-6c9d3170f2d1 |
| EC Number | 250-995-3 |
| Gmelin Reference | 85728 |
| KEGG | C18798 |
| MeSH | Cyclohexyltriazolylstannane |
| PubChem CID | 21304329 |
| RTECS number | WH2087000 |
| UNII | 8EE7N2Y7H6 |
| UN number | UN2810 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID4022285 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C21H39N3Sn |
| Molar mass | 565.23 g/mol |
| Appearance | White solid |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.32 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | insoluble |
| log P | 4.74 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Acidity (pKa) | 13.9 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 12.50 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | Diamagnetic |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.584 |
| Viscosity | 200 cP |
| Dipole moment | 3.91 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 615.8 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -175.6 kJ·mol⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | –1650 kJ·mol⁻¹ |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | Harmful if swallowed. Causes skin irritation. Causes serious eye irritation. May cause respiratory irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS05, GHS07 |
| Pictograms | GHS05,GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H301 + H331: Toxic if swallowed or if inhaled. H410: Very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects. |
| Precautionary statements | P261, P280, P305+P351+P338, P310 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-2-0-特殊 |
| Flash point | >100°C |
| Autoignition temperature | 330°C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 Oral Rat 2330 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (oral, rat): 47 mg/kg |
| NIOSH | Not established |
| PEL (Permissible) | No PEL established. |
| REL (Recommended) | 0.1 mg/m³ |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not listed |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Trimethyltin chloride Triethyltin chloride Triphenyltin chloride Tributyltin chloride Tripropyltin chloride |
