© 2026 Sinochem Nanjing Corporation,
All Right Reserved
Tonka Musk holds deep roots in perfume culture, drawing fascination from both natural and synthetic origins. The story traces back centuries, with the Tonka bean emerging from the dense forests of South America. Early European perfumers treasured the aroma, which came alive through the natural coumarin found in these beans. In those days, the journey from bean to bottle demanded a deep respect for both raw nature and patient extraction, often involving long infusions and careful drying. Over time, pure coumarin isolated from the beans became a critical tool for perfumers, providing a consistent and powerful note that carried perfume houses through waves of fragrance trends. The industry moved fast once coumarin synthesis kicked in during the late nineteenth century, opening doors for the modern “musk” profile. Before then, musk’s story was tangled up with animal sources like the musk deer and civet. Today, the thread of Tonka Musk reflects both technological leaps and a vibrant, shifting story of legality, tradition, and invention in olfactory chemistry.
For anyone searching for warmth and depth in perfumes, Tonka Musk steps in as a familiar friend. While many know the lush, comforting smell—creamy, sweet, laced with almond and vanilla—less consider its place as a backbone in countless fragrance formulas. The main players are coumarin and its derivatives, which bring the musky, hay-like nuance that has colored everything from artisanal boutique perfumes to the blockbusters of big cosmetics. Across the industry, the focus has grown less on pure tonka bean extracts and more on skillful blends and recreations, weaving in synthetic musks, powdery woods, and hints of honey. Tonka Musk shows up in both concentrated oils and ready-to-use fragrance bases, slotting easily into high-end and mass-market products alike. In labs, the balance leans toward reproducibility and purity, shaping an ingredient profile that serves artistic and regulatory needs in tandem.
Tonka Musk draws its recognizable scent from coumarin, a crystalline solid that sits pale, almost white, with an unmistakable vanilla-sweet aroma. At room temperature, coumarin might float into the air, lending a persistent character, especially once heat, skin, or alcohol unlocks its volatility. Its melting point falls just below 70 degrees Celsius, so perfumers know that it softens and transforms long before it breaks down. The compound’s structure—a lactone ring, technically speaking—lets it blend smoothly with a range of flowers, spices, and animalic notes. Synthetic tonka musks take this a step further, tweaking the core molecule for greater stability, softer tones, or improved scent projection. These lab-modified versions sometimes look like mellow powders, ready for mixing, and stretch the tonka experience far beyond what the original bean could offer.
Labels on Tonka Musk products reveal only part of the larger picture. Pure coumarin content sits front and center, mostly due to its restricted status in several countries. Perfume, personal care, and even some food products require strict adherence to allowable limits, which regulatory groups watch closely. Finished fragrance mixes may carry terms like “tonka accord,” “sweet musk,” or “coumarin-rich compound” instead of blunt percentages, but industry insiders pay careful attention to batch analysis, purity grades, and traceability records. Every shipment faces quality checks for contamination and degradation, as the tiniest impurity can disrupt the intended scent or raise legal flags. For many producers, transparency now stands alongside artistry, letting buyers and regulators see both the science and the soul of the raw material.
The classic preparation of Tonka Musk starts with tonka beans, which soak and age in alcohol or water. Crystallized coumarin appears on the surface, harvested by hand or filtered for further refinement. Modern syntheses, on the other hand, rely on cheaper, more sustainable chemical routes, taking salicylaldehyde or phenols and coaxing them into coumarin through reactions with acids or bases. Perfumers often combine the synthetic coumarin with fixative ingredients, balancing longevity and richness. Many developments focus on greener chemistry: fewer solvents, better yields, and less waste. The art hasn't faded in the rush for efficiency. Experts still tweak temperature, timing, and mixing order, treating each batch as both a technical puzzle and a creative challenge.
Once chemists isolate coumarin or similar structures, their toolkit for altering Tonka Musk expands dramatically. Hydrogenation, chlorination, and hydroxylation bring out new facets in the scent profile, sometimes sharpening sweetness, sometimes adding layers of earthiness or spice. For years, the market chased new musks and tonka derivatives with better performance—stayer power on skin, less allergenic risk, improved environmental breakdown. Many modern “musk” compounds, despite similar names or scents, walk far from the old tonka bean’s chemistry, built from aromatic aldehydes or macrocyclic lactones instead. Each new molecule faces years of toxicology screening and ecological review before joining the old favorites in a commercial perfume. This pressure drives a loop of invention and reformulation, answering shifts in law, taste, and health guidance.
Tonka Musk runs by many names in the wild world of perfumery and chemistry. “Coumarin” marks the star molecule, though bottles might bear “tonka bean absolute,” “musky vanilla,” or “sweet hay aroma.” Synthetic variants bear numbers and trade names. Some labels include reference to “balsamic musk,” tying back to the way tonka softens and rounds out sharper scents. Regulation has forced greater honesty in naming, with “musk” now separated more clearly into “macrocyclic,” “polycyclic,” or “nitro” classes, especially after worries about lingering residues and water pollution. Still, for many consumers, “Tonka Musk” sells itself on scent—not on chemical purity or precise nomenclature.
Regulatory agencies flag coumarin and many musk derivatives for close scrutiny, particularly around chronic toxicity and environmental impact. Limits cap how much can appear in finished products, and records show recalls or reformulations whenever limits edge too close. Factory technicians need solid, up-to-date training to minimize spills, vapor inhalation, and skin contact, not just because of immediate harm, but due to the slow buildup of safety evidence over years. On the shop floor, simple measures like gloves and hoods show that safety culture doesn't spring only from manuals but from hands-on, daily responsibility. Waste management rules have tightened, too, as attention swings toward downstream waterways and wildlife. Responsible producers now back their supply chains with routine audits, not only out of legal necessity but to keep trust with an increasingly watchful public.
Most people catch Tonka Musk’s magic on the skin, woven into colognes, perfumes, and body lotions. It thrives best as a mid or base note, adding staying power and smoothness beneath spikier top notes. Beyond personal fragrance, tonka-scented molecules drift quietly into scented candles, air fresheners, and some gourmet foods, though legal restrictions in food grow tighter every year. Artisan soap makers use it to mask harsh odors from oils and lye, or to provide a feeling of warmth and comfort in cold-process bars. In the past, even tobacco flavorings leaned on the sweet, bitter qualities of coumarin, until health concerns shifted attitudes and laws. Across products, the appeal remains constant: anchoring bolder notes and providing a sense of depth that simple vanilla can't.
R&D in Tonka Musk rarely sits still. Chemical firms spend years working through new variants to sidestep legal barriers and answer public worries about allergies, hormone disruption, or environmental buildup. These projects dig deep into molecular modeling, high-throughput testing, and collaborations that stretch from university labs to fragrance powerhouses. Recently, green chemistry breakthroughs have changed the way musks join the palette, reducing reliance on energy-intensive processes and offering better biodegradability. These investments demand both patience and perspective, as today’s breakthrough can quickly become tomorrow’s careful recall—or regulatory headache. Analysis tools such as GC-MS sharpen detection, building mountains of data that shape not just product safety but also creative direction. The future leans on those who balance regulation, sustainability, and market demands without losing the artistry that gave Tonka Musk its legendary place in perfume.
Concerns about toxicity have shaped Tonka Musk’s path more than fashion trends or technological shifts. Early on, stories of liver damage linked to high coumarin intake drew heavy lines around use, especially in food. Perfume and personal care industries adapted faster, relying on dilution and substitution where risk data suggested caution. Researchers focus on chronic exposure, weighing the risks of skin sensitization, endocrine disruption, and bioaccumulation in water and wildlife. Peer-reviewed reports and regulatory findings both fuel and complicate public debate, especially as more consumers search out “clean” or “natural” products. Studies often reveal gray areas—small risks at very high doses, long-term effects still under review—so producers walk a careful line between safety, efficacy, and meeting the demand for evocative scents. Transparency and ongoing investment in safety science carry more weight with each passing decade.
Tonka Musk’s future will depend on how the industry meets fresh challenges. Demand for sustainable sourcing and evidence-backed safety now sits shoulder-to-shoulder with the push for deeper, richer, longer-lasting scents. With public focus honing in on ingredient transparency, companies with solid audit trails and green-tinted chemistry stand poised to own the next chapter. There’s plenty of room for craft—whether in rediscovering traditional extraction, pioneering biodegradable musks, or riding the next wave of AI-driven molecular design. Regulations will continue to shift, bending in the face of new data, so no formula stays fixed for long. For buyers and creators alike, Tonka Musk remains a place where history, science, and sensory delight come together, changed by every hand that shapes it.
Tonka Musk delivers a scent that feels both familiar and a bit mysterious. Musk acts as the cozy backbone, giving off a natural warmth. It stays close to the skin and projects a soft, clean feeling that calls to mind freshly washed linen and gentle skin contact. Growing up, I always noticed a kind of comfort in fragrances built around musk—not flashy, just quietly pleasant.
Tonka gives the blend a true signature. The bean from the Dipteryx odorata tree brings a nutty-sweet aroma—it smells like vanilla rolled in hay, with a hint of almonds and a wisp of earth. Anyone who’s tried real tonka beans in desserts will catch that soft, almost edible sweetness.
Tonka Musk won’t be complete without that rush of creamy sweetness at the center. The tonka itself smells like an intersection of vanilla, caramel, and a touch of tobacco. There’s more to it, though. I’ve noticed faint reminders of cinnamon and even a bit of cherry in some blends—these don’t take center stage, but they add richness. Perfume formulas often harness coumarin from the tonka bean. Historians in fragrance circles point out that coumarin marked a turning point for perfumes back in the 19th century, and it still plays a role in modern tonka-inspired scents today.
Many versions of Tonka Musk pair these heart notes with soft white florals like jasmine or orange blossom. These floral touches break up the sweetness and give the scent dimension. Even those who generally skip florals in their perfumes might appreciate what they offer here—a cleanliness, a streak of brightness.
The base notes set the stage for a fragrance’s staying power. In Tonka Musk, the lasting impression is built on musk, tonka, and often fresh woods like sandalwood or cedar. Sandalwood has a creamy, milky profile that pairs well with tonka; cedar keeps things from getting cloying.
Some perfumers bring in subtle touches of amber or patchouli for warmth and grounding. I’ll never forget sampling a tonka-musk scent on a cold day and picking up just enough earth and spice from the base notes to keep things from veering into dessert territory. The overall effect felt both elegant and approachable.
Understanding these fragrance notes isn’t just about fancy language. Knowing what’s in a perfume allows consumers to make smarter choices, especially since certain ingredients prompt allergies or aren’t cruelty-free. The IFRA (International Fragrance Association) keeps a close eye on allergens like coumarin, so reputable perfumers usually disclose what’s in each bottle.
Fragrance can be a deeply personal thing. Each skin chemistry draws out different aspects. If you gravitate toward warm, enveloping scents that don’t shout for attention, Tonka Musk brings depth without being overbearing. Brands can help us out by providing clearer note breakdowns so shoppers feel confident before they buy.
For those with concerns about synthetic versus natural sources, it helps to know that many perfumers are shifting toward lab-made coumarin to avoid deforestation linked to tonka harvesting. This is a good step for sustainability. If anyone is looking to understand whether a scent will fit daily life or just a special occasion, getting familiar with the real building blocks—the musk, tonka, subtle woods and honeysuckle florals—can make all the difference.
Tonka musk captures attention in a way that few fragrance notes manage. The name alone brings a cozy, nutty sweetness, mixed with a hint of warm forest floor. This note combines the earthy depth of tonka bean with the smooth, almost clean scent of musk. It’s subtle in one way and bold in another. People often ask if a single ingredient like this can work for anyone or if it belongs in “his” or “her” bottle. In practice, those lines blur more every year.
Tonka bean lies at the base of many beloved perfumes. Its scent leans sweet, with soft elements of vanilla, almond, and even a touch of spice. Musk, on the other hand, tends to offer a gentle, skin-like quality. When perfumers bring the two together, the mix lands somewhere rich but not cloying, gentle without being plain. It recalls the warmth of home baking and clean laundry, the kind of familiarity that doesn’t sort itself by gender.
Fragrance does more than hint at gender. Personal memories, family ties, and even climate shape preferences. For a long time, the industry tried to box in “for him” and “for her,” loading men’s bottles with wood and spice, women’s with sweetness and flowers. Tonka musk lives on the borderland. Its sweetness isn’t syrupy, and its musk doesn’t shout. This gentle contradiction makes it easy to wear for anyone drawn to soft warmth instead of heady florals or plain citrus.
In practice, most modern fragrance fans look for scents that feel good rather than those that obey the label at the counter. I’ve seen collectors proudly sporting bottles with no gender stamp. Friends of all backgrounds swap recommendations with little interest in the “M” or “F” on the box. Many boutique perfumers ignore those old divisions, building lines around stories and moods, not assigned gender. Data from the Fragrance Creators Association shows an increase in unisex perfume launches every year, and tonka musk features heavily in those blends, cropping up alongside sandalwood, bergamot, and amber.
Real confidence in wearing a scent rests not in whether it’s meant “for men” or “for women,” but if it fits a person’s mood and personality. For those looking for something comforting, tonka musk proves versatile. Some find that it pairs perfectly with a cashmere sweater or a white shirt. It works at a candlelit dinner, but doesn’t feel out of place at a morning meeting. In my own testing—swapping scents with friends or during shop visits—tonka creations always draw curiosity from both sides of the aisle. Often, the note gets the same feedback: “What is that? It smells like home.”
Brands seem to have caught on. Labels like Byredo, Maison Margiela, and Tom Ford give tonka musk center stage in several bestsellers, never strongly tied to either men’s or women’s aisles. These bottles sell out to all kinds of buyers, and online reviews don’t cluster along strict gender lines. Fragrance groups on social media trade tips on how to layer tonka-infused scents, mix them with sharper or greener notes, and use them as signatures regardless of who “should” wear them. This level of experimentation helps more people find a scent that feels right—and confirms that comfort and joy matter more than categories.
Tonka musk isn’t about being masculine or feminine. It brings comfort, warmth, and a touch of understated luxury. If someone connects with its aroma, they can claim it, no matter what the bottle says. That freedom makes it a real modern classic, one worth exploring by anyone looking for their own scent trail.
Memory holds onto scents longer than faces or names. That’s why we keep asking how long our favorite fragrance lasts. For Tonka Musk, this question runs deeper than curiosity. Perfumers and perfume lovers want to understand if a scent can truly go the distance. Even as trends change, musk notes like this serve as a quiet anchor, reliably offering warmth and comfort.
Years ago, in a small perfumery workshop, I watched a seasoned nose blend tonka bean’s sweet, almondy warmth with musk’s subtle animalic touch. He didn’t fuss with complicated charts or numbers; he used his skin as a canvas. Some fragrances would vanish after lunch. Tonka Musk would still drift into the evening. That hands-on approach lines up with studies in fragrance chemistry—tonka’s coumarin slowly releases scent, while traditional musk molecules grip the skin longer than lighter florals.
People want more than facts, though. Talk to anyone who wears Tonka Musk, and they’ll recall compliments long after applying it. This tells us something important: Tonka Musk has a reputation for longevity, and it isn’t just marketing hype.
Fragrance life depends on skin chemistry, weather, and even what you had for breakfast. On my dry, winter skin, Tonka Musk clings for about eight to ten hours, sometimes longer. Colleagues with oilier skin say it sticks around even after a full workday. Some report traces on shirt cuffs and scarves days later.
L’Oreal’s scientific library backs this up: once applied, heavier base notes like musk stick with you, mingling with tonka’s deep sweet facets. Warmth from the body makes the scent radiant without overpowering—a fact anyone stuck in a crowded elevator can appreciate. Soap and synthetic detergent won’t always lift the last traces. It’s not unusual to pick up the scent on a pillowcase or coat the next day.
Health professionals point out that skin type, diet and even medication change scent projection and life. Tonka Musk usually resists these variables better than citrus or aquatic scents, thanks to its structure. Still, humidity or sweat can shorten wear. Layering with unscented lotion or spraying on fabric seems to extend the fragrance’s staying power. Store bottles in a cool, dark corner to keep ingredients stable—heat and light wreck delicate notes fast.
Most people spend good money on fragrance and expect it to last. Without that certainty, trust erodes. Longevity shapes our buying decisions as much as the top notes do. Perfumers can engineer new formulas using more tenacious molecules, but there’s no substitute for old-school ingredients like tonka or a quality fixative. Encouraging consumers to test on skin—not strips in stores—bridges the gap between expectation and reality.
Information makes the difference. Clear labeling about average wear time helps shoppers avoid disappointment. Brands owe it to their customers to be open about ingredient quality, not just creative marketing. Scientists keep exploring better ways to stabilize scent. Meanwhile, fragrance fans can make Tonka Musk last by applying to pulse points, moisturizing beforehand, and choosing denser concentrations like extrait or oil-based blends. Sometimes, old advice from grandmothers—dab on your hair or slip a scented scarf in your bag—still works best.
Tonka musk shows up on ingredient lists for all sorts of lifestyle products — from perfumes to candles to fancy soaps. People often ask if Tonka musk fits the bill for cruelty-free and vegan living. That question lands at my doorstep time and again. Whenever I hunt for fragrances, I want to know who or what paid the price for that pleasant scent.
Tonka musk gets its main note from the tonka bean, a small, wrinkled legume that grows in South America. These beans pack a rich, warm aroma — like vanilla, almond, and just a hint of spice. Companies harvest the beans and extract their coumarin, which delivers most of the flavor and fragrance. Tonka beans don’t involve animal byproducts, nor do they require animal labor or animal-driven farming practices. The beans grow on Dipteryx odorata trees that simply need a warm climate and some rain.
It’s not just ingredients that matter. True cruelty-free goes deeper — it questions lab practices and how final blends reach the shelves. Cosmetic brands sometimes test scents or finished products on animals because regulators in certain countries make them do it. Thankfully, most Tonka musk comes from companies based in places with tough consumer safety laws and cruelty-free commitments. France, the US, and the UK have large markets for these ingredients, and suppliers know they risk their reputation if their name surfaces in animal-rights headlines. Leaping Bunny certification and Cruelty Free International guides often confirm claims.
I always dig for details. I shoot emails to brands when research brings me up short. If the brand won’t answer or dodges, I cross them off my list. Some companies skip animal testing on ingredients but might test the final perfume, especially if they want to enter markets like China. I’ve seen that confusion and disappointment up close. Authentic cruelty-free brands share transparent sourcing stories, batch data, and audit results. Customers need more of these open conversations and easier access to third-party certifications.
Vegan shoppers should relax around Tonka musk. Most suppliers extract tonka from beans, not from animals or animal products. Skeptics ask about other musks in perfumes. Real musk glands come from a deer, though synthetic or plant-based alternatives rule today’s market. Tonka musk — if true to name — holds nothing from animal glands, beeswax, honey, milk, or other animal-based aromas. Plant-based blending stands as the norm for these products.
Hidden animal byproducts can slip in through stabilizers, alcohols, and even color fixers, so vegan status relies on those details, too. I’ve learned to read ingredient lists and look up odd words. I rely most on vegan labels or PETA’s vegan database. I know dedicated vegans who almost became detectives just to clarify if a label really meant what it said. Clear, upfront marketing helps everyone make easier, informed decisions.
Greater attention to cruelty-free and vegan labeling helps, but it’s not the only fix. Certifications by independent organizations do more than ads or pretty packaging. Perfume brands should publish ingredient origins, production methods, and testing policies. Regular audits help build trust and squash greenwashing fast. For buyers, press brands for certification and detailed data. If enough shoppers raise their voices, honest practices shift from trend to standard.
In my experience, the industry responds to demand, but it sometimes requires a nudge. Every time I ask about sourcing and animal welfare, the next batch of products starts displaying clearer details. Big or small, every question counts. Choosing Tonka musk without animal cost builds better options for everyone down the line.
Tonka musk sits among those perfumery ingredients that stir curiosity. Some might picture just a few tiny dropper bottles on a shelf, thinking these cover the full span. In real practice, the world of tonka musk supplies looks broader and more flexible.
The perfume market works on variety. Artisan creators often order in 5 ml or 10 ml amber glass bottles. These sizes let a hobbyist or small-batch producer give a new note a thorough try, without a big investment. Someone blending for gifts or a limited run will get a feel for the richness of tonka musk’s sweet and creamy aroma in these pocket-sized bottles.
Bigger operations, like indie brands or contract manufacturers, lean into larger packs. It’s common to see tonka musk in 100 ml or 500 ml bottles. Suppliers use either glass or HDPE plastic for these. A studio blending scents for retail shelves or subscription boxes burns through musk quickly. These mid-range sizes strike a balance between bulk savings and fresh, safe storage. They avoid both waste and the risk of the oil going stale before use.
Things dial up for commercial scale. Bulk perfumery outfits order tonka musk in 1-liter, 2.5-liter, or up to 5-liter jugs. The packaging here has to stand up to shipping, heat, and long-term storage. Suppliers often turn to thick-walled, light-blocking drums to hold large volumes. Lab teams need precision access, so some come with special pouring necks or dispensers that let mixers pull only what they need.
I’ve watched more than a few perfumers get backed into a corner by ingredient minimums. Being locked into a one-size-fits-all order hurts small businesses and hobbyists. A truly open market needs to meet all levels of demand, from dabblers to pros. Sizing brings that flexibility. A new perfumer exploring fragrance families can afford to experiment on a small scale, learning as they go. Those brewing at scale gain savings and efficiency from bulk, but only if pack sizes match their real-world needs.
There’s also safety to consider. Tonka musk’s concentrated aroma calls for care in storage and handling. Small bottles cut down the chances of spills or oxidation. Giant drums require better planning—ventilation, secure transfer, minimized exposure. Smart suppliers help buyers size up their risks and match them with appropriate containers.
Genuine ingredient traceability ranks high in importance. Responsible suppliers make clear not just what they sell, but how it’s sourced and packed. Some provide lot numbers, safety sheets, and even suggestions about which bottle works best for which project size. This helps buyers both learn and stay safe. It lines up with best practices set by the International Fragrance Association and keeps companies on the safe side of global rules.
Online retailers do a decent job in giving clear format lists and storage tips. But the most trustworthy vendors, in my experience, go further. They respond to questions, offer trial sizes, and update product listings with new regulatory info. Transparency isn’t a luxury—it's part of building trust with anyone who wants to create using tonka musk, from a kitchen table to full factory floors.
Even with good variety on offer, I see room to close some gaps. More clear, plastic-free options would help customers who care about waste. Refillable and returnable drums could reduce environmental impact. Standardizing label information would smooth out reordering and batch tracking. Makers and buyers should push for these kinds of upgrades to keep the tonka musk supply chain safer and more sustainable for everyone involved.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | 5-cyclohexadecen-1-one |
| Other names |
Musk Tonka |
| Pronunciation | /ˈtɒŋ.kə mʌsk/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 104-60-9 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1368122 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:85166 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL3184603 |
| ChemSpider | 21547195 |
| DrugBank | DB14189 |
| ECHA InfoCard | ECHA InfoCard: 100003905882 |
| EC Number | EC 289-370-3 |
| Gmelin Reference | 913222 |
| KEGG | Cice000000022 |
| MeSH | Tonka Musk |
| PubChem CID | 15537060 |
| RTECS number | WK8250000 |
| UNII | QP049J811Q |
| UN number | UN1993 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C16H18O3 |
| Molar mass | 292.46 g/mol |
| Appearance | Colorless to pale yellow liquid |
| Odor | musky |
| Density | 0.94 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble |
| log P | 3.85 |
| Vapor pressure | 0.0000825 mmHg @ 25 °C |
| Acidity (pKa) | 12.5 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 12.6 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | −6.7×10⁻⁶ cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.49600 |
| Viscosity | Medium |
| Dipole moment | 3.1994 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 259.58 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -6215 kJ·mol⁻¹ |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | V06DX |
| Hazards | |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, GHS08 |
| Pictograms | 🌸🍃💧🪵 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H317: May cause an allergic skin reaction. |
| Precautionary statements | P102 Keep out of reach of children. P501 Dispose of contents/container to approved disposal site, in accordance with local regulations. |
| Flash point | >100 °C |
| Autoignition temperature | 470°C |
| LD50 (median dose) | 11.14 mg/L |
| PEL (Permissible) | 0.0100 |
| REL (Recommended) | 7 hours |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Tonka 44 Tonka Scent Musc Tonkin |
