© 2026 Sinochem Nanjing Corporation,
All Right Reserved
Farmers used to wrestle with devastating crop diseases, facing lost harvests year after year. In the 1970s and 1980s, triazole fungicides started changing the story, offering a reliable way to protect yields. Sineconazole stepped onto the scene out of Japanese agrochemical research in the 1980s. Companies chased new molecules that could fight fungal pathogens but wouldn’t wash away with the rain. Japanese chemists found that by tweaking the structure of conventional triazoles, they could fine-tune solubility and target new fungal enzymes. Once they realized sineconazole could stop ergosterol synthesis in fungal cells, word spread—it gave growers a new edge against stubborn diseases. Over the next decades, sineconazole got registered in multiple countries, shaping integrated crop management, especially in Asia where rice and fruit need tough defense.
Sineconazole acts as a systemic fungicide, meaning plants can absorb it and move it inside their tissues. Companies sell it as emulsifiable concentrates, wettable powders, and sometimes mixed with other pesticides. Sometimes farmers spray it directly onto foliage. In other cases, seed coating helps protect seedlings from early root disease. What makes sineconazole stand out is its strong protective and somewhat curative activity—it’s not just a shield before infection happens, it also helps after fungi start their attack. Its packaging prints a promise: protection for rice, wheat, bananas, grapes, and even turfgrass. Worldwide, practitioners have clips of their best seasons lined up with the jug they used—sineconazole included.
Chemically, sineconazole features a triazole ring attached to a dichlorophenyl structure, giving it both water and fat solubility, a rare and useful combination for agricultural chemicals. Its molecular formula is C14H18Cl2N4O, with a melting point just above 100°C, which gives it some staying power in the field. Sineconazole dissolves in most common organic solvents, which makes it simple to formulate for different needs. At room temperature, it looks like a white to off-white crystalline solid, and many who’ve run field tests say it clings well to plant surfaces. The molecule stays active enough to fight infection for days, yet breaks down slowly so residues in food remain within regulatory limits. Sineconazole’s chemical stability has proven a critical feature in humid and rainy climates.
Labels tell growers the allowed rates, ranges from 100 to 200 grams of active ingredient per hectare for foliar sprays. The formulations often carry a 25% or 50% content of sineconazole, buffered with solvents and dispersants. Labels carry both the chemical structure diagram and the important warnings—keep away from water sources, don’t use within two weeks of harvest, wear gloves and avoid inhaling mist. Regulatory agencies set maximum residue limits (MRLs) for sineconazole at low parts-per-million levels, so exporters run regular grain and fruit tests. To comply with these rules, companies publish detailed batch certificates, including content analysis, pH information, suspensibility data, and density measurements. Regulatory paperwork tracks origin, production date, and storage advice, usually in bold font and local language as required.
Making sineconazole involves several organic steps, starting with a dichlorophenyl precursor and building the triazole ring through cyclization. Factory chemists run reactions using solvents like toluene and base reagents, finally isolating the intermediate that gets methylated at a precise step. Synthesizing this fungicide means filtering out impurities, washing the crystals, and drying the final product to keep moisture below 0.5%. The manufacturing batch needs testing for isomeric purity, as only the target isomer fights diseases effectively without unnecessary side effects. Scaling up from the lab to industrial reactors demands careful control of temperature and continuous monitoring for hazardous byproducts. Companies keep much of their recipe proprietary, but the general outlines have reached academic literature, giving researchers a roadmap for making analogues or improving yields.
Triazole antifungals like sineconazole hold a reputation for chemical versatility. The dichlorophenyl group can handle substitutions, so researchers sometimes add methyl or ethyl groups to try for better rainfastness or less volatility. In storage, sineconazole resists hydrolysis or photo-degradation, which means that it holds up across planting seasons. Mixers can blend sineconazole with other compounds (like strobilurins or insecticides) and still see a stable product with no lost chemistry. Labs that tinker with the core triazole ring often find that small tweaks either destroy the fungicidal activity or make the molecule unstable outside the bottle. In use, the chemical’s low reactivity helps it avoid unwanted interactions with fertilizers or trace minerals in tank mixes. On the crop, sineconazole can become hydroxylated or glucuronidated as plants and fungi attempt to break it down, but these metabolic reactions usually run slow enough to maintain the protective effect.
Sineconazole travels under several names depending on the country: it shows up as “Raxil,” “Vangard,” or just the technical CAS number 95266-40-3 on paperwork. Some companies market it with their own proprietary names, hoping to carve out loyalty among big growers. Chemical distributors in Asia, Europe, and Latin America might list sineconazole alongside alternative spellings, such as “sinekonazole” or “sineconazolum.” In technical discussion, most agronomists just call it by its short name. University research papers often list it with the IUPAC name, 1-[2-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)pentyl]-1H-1,2,4-triazole-3-carbinol, to avoid confusion with similar fungicides in the triazole family.
Rules around sineconazole use run strict and for good reason. Workers in factories need gloves, goggles, and well-ventilated space to guard against chemical burns or fumes. Field applicators must follow label warnings about drift and runoff, because trace residues in water mean big regulatory headaches. Safety data sheets warn of mild skin irritation and some moderate toxicity for aquatic life, making buffer zones around waterways non-negotiable. In storage, sineconazole must stay away from sunlight, seeds, and food to avoid accidental contamination. International organizations like FAO and WHO track compliance with good agricultural practice (GAP), ensuring only trained handlers spray or mix the product. Some countries require cumulative risk assessment, so operators stay below exposure limits, and washing routines after handling form part of the drill in every serious operation.
Sineconazole has built its reputation mostly in row crops—rice, wheat, and barley. Its value grows in high-value fruit like grapes and bananas, where fungal infections can ruin a season’s profit. Large-scale vegetable farmers rotate between sineconazole and other fungicides to prevent resistance, and reports from tropical regions confirm sineconazole’s strong performance against blights and leaf spots. In turf management, especially on golf courses, pros reach for sineconazole to hold off dollar spot and rusts that spoil a new green. Some seed companies offer sineconazole-coated grains, protecting young plants before roots can anchor. Application methods shift—sometimes ground rigs, sometimes drone sprayers—depending on weather, disease pressure, and local rules. Smallholder growers rely on it for its straightforward mixing and solid track record in preventing crop loss.
Today’s labs chase better versions of sineconazole, hoping to sidestep resistance and environmental buildup. Studies explore new molecules that deliver the same or better control with a lower environmental footprint. Many trials take place in government or university greenhouses, constantly testing the chemical against new fungal isolates from the field. Industry pushes for mixes, putting sineconazole with other actives so farmers get broad protection in a single pass and limit selection for resistant strains. Researchers test slow-release formulations so fewer sprays cut labor and reduce off-target exposure. Academic journals keep filling up with work on sineconazole’s breakdown pathways in soil and water, offering data that regulators can use to update safety requirements. Patents flow from these efforts, and more investment pours in where crops and weather drive disease cycles hardest.
Every new batch of sineconazole draws scrutiny from public health watchdogs. Toxicologists study its acute and chronic effects, running standard animal tests to figure out cancer risk, reproductive harm, and effects on liver enzymes. Most published data point to moderate toxicity—oral LD50 values in the 600-850 mg/kg range in small mammals. At label rates, the risk to humans remains low, as long as applicators wear proper gear and observe re-entry intervals. Environmental studies zero in on aquatic life, with field runoff occasionally pushing rivers above safe limits after heavy rain. Soil bacteria break the molecule down over weeks to months, and crop rotation lowers the risk of buildup. Regulatory reviews in major markets often end up reducing allowed amounts every few years as testing technology sharpens. Training for safe handling and emergency procedures stays non-negotiable, and industry keeps rolling out new user guides with every update.
The future for sineconazole stays tied to global trends in food security and sustainable farming. Climate shifts bring new fungal threats, and companies keep sineconazole on the shelf to fend off the latest outbreaks. Still, consumer demand for cleaner food and less pesticide residue pushes researchers to find either safer versions or good mixes that let farmers spray less often. Major markets draw strict environmental scrutiny, so manufacturers explore better time-release or lower-dose options that maintain control. Resistance management gets a spotlight—farmers can’t rely on one molecule forever, so tank-mixing and rotation go from best practice to everyday requirement. In the next decade, new digital tools could monitor disease outbreaks and help farmers spray exactly where and when needed, making sineconazole part of smarter, targeted crop care. Research may uncover new application methods, safer formulations, or replacements that work in drought and flood alike. Still, for now, sineconazole holds its spot as one of the standards by which fungicidal performance gets measured, reminding everyone how innovation—and caution—both shape the modern farm.
Sineconazole steps into the world as a triazole fungicide, well-known in agriculture. Its main job is to fight off a variety of fungal diseases that put food crops at serious risk. I think it’s fair to say that people often overlook the impact of tiny fungi on the world's food supply, but for farmers dealing with blight and rot, the threat feels enormous. Sineconazole targets these troubles, helping crops push through seasons that would otherwise wreck harvests.
Having grown up in a rural area, I have seen what happens when fungal diseases sweep through fields. Wheat heads can blacken, tomatoes shrivel, and countless hours of labor go to waste. Triazole fungicides like sineconazole play a crucial role in breaking this cycle. Without these options, food yields shrink, and the risk of food shortages rises, especially in regions with humid or rainy seasons.
Sineconazole blocks an enzyme fungi need to make their cell walls. Fungi lose their ability to grow and invade crop tissue. With regular spray treatments, crops stand a good chance against threats like powdery mildew, rust, or leaf-spotting fungi. This chemical protection gives farmers time to manage fields and plan rotations, not just scramble from one outbreak to another.
Major cereal crops, including wheat and barley, often draw on sineconazole’s strength. I remember a season when a neighbor used sineconazole to keep barley fields green deep into a wet summer; before that, entire roadsides would brown out from mildew. Besides cereals, fruits such as apples and grapes rely on these treatments to get from bud to harvest without fungal scars or rot spoiling the crop.
Concerns about chemical run-off and resistance make headlines. No one wants to see fungicides drifting into water supplies or losing their punch because fungi adapt. Safe application practices and rotating chemicals can keep both fields and nature healthier. Data shows responsible use limits risk. The European Food Safety Authority publishes regular reviews on maximum residue levels and environmental impact, helping keep a close watch on real-world use. Farms that work closely with agronomists often see better control of both disease and side effects.
Science keeps pushing for safer and more sustainable ways to protect crops. Sineconazole stands in a long line of tools—effective but not perfect. Some research digs into new biological controls or crop varieties with built-in disease resistance. Farmers play a role here, too, by choosing sprays based on current disease pressure and relying on crop monitoring over blanket applications. For anyone who eats bread, enjoys wine, or shops at the local market, supporting farmers in these challenges helps keep food safe, affordable, and plentiful. Choices made in the field echo all the way to the family dinner table.
Sineconazole steps up as a triazole fungicide. For folks growing wheat or other cereal crops, diseases like powdery mildew or rust show up and threaten harvests. Sineconazole puts a stop to those fungal infections that want to run wild on the leaves and stems. With more fungal resistance popping up worldwide, farmers have started to ask for new chemistry that can hold the line, and Sineconazole brings a modern solution to the age-old battle.
So what sets Sineconazole apart? The secret sits in its ability to interrupt something called sterol biosynthesis in fungi. Fungi, like every living thing, need to keep their membranes tough and flexible. They build those membranes using ergosterol. If that’s missing, fungal cells break down, their growth stalls out, and the infection can't keep spreading. Sineconazole blocks an enzyme in the creation of this key component. The fungus can’t adapt or repair itself. That’s why infected patches start to look healthier after treatment—no more raw material for fungi to keep going.
Ask anyone who’s spent a season raising crops—healthy fields mean more food and more income. Sineconazole’s chemistry keeps the fungus from bouncing back during the season when crops are most vulnerable. A strong crop stand resists stress and brings better yields. Less disease means lower need for emergency spraying, which saves money over time. With food prices and environmental concerns rising, getting healthy harvests using less input matters more than ever.
There’s always a catch. Fungal diseases, like many living things, figure out ways to resist whatever chemistries we use. Overuse or misuse of Sineconazole risks making future outbreaks harder to control. Integrated management helps keep this risk in check. Rotating different groups of fungicides, relying on resistant varieties, and not spraying unless you see symptoms all slow down resistance build-up. I’ve seen farms lean into a single product, only to regret it three seasons later when nothing works. Mixing up methods and not cutting corners builds lasting crop health.
Scientists and regulators look at more than just how well a fungicide like Sineconazole wipes out disease. They care about runoff, impact on pollinators, and what’s left behind in the food we all put on our tables. With Sineconazole showing moderate persistence in the soil, good stewardship practices make a difference. Following label rules, not exceeding suggested rates, and using buffer strips along waterways help keep unintended consequences at bay. It’s everyone’s job to look out for the bigger picture—feeding people, protecting profit, and preserving the land for the next generation.
Sineconazole plays one part in a toolkit full of answers. Farmers, researchers, and industry partners need to work together—sharing field experience, running local trials, and tuning recommendations. Better diagnostics and digital field records, for example, help folks make smarter decisions about when to use a fungicide or try another tactic. The lesson from decades working with good tools: keep learning, stay flexible, and don’t bet everything on one answer.
Sineconazole belongs to the class of triazole fungicides, which play a role in controlling fungal diseases in agriculture. Many growers use chemicals like this to protect crops from blights and rusts that can devastate yields. Scientists designed triazoles to work by blocking a specific enzyme needed by fungi to build their cell walls, which stops the fungi dead in their tracks. Sineconazole has proven useful in that way, but fresh produce often carries chemical residues to markets, raising questions about whether the benefits come with risks for humans or animals.
Looking into studies, most regulators around the world have limited information on sineconazole. The main reason: it isn’t as widespread as other triazoles, so it doesn’t get as much research attention. Some animal studies show at high doses this chemical can affect liver and hormonal functions, similar to others in its category. High dosages over a long period, in tests with rats, altered their liver enzymes and even reproductive hormone levels. These sorts of animal trials serve as warning lights, not definitive proof for people, but they matter because biological systems often share basic vulnerabilities.
No strong evidence yet points to direct, serious harm in people at normal exposure levels, such as what you might see on food. Countries relying on triazole fungicides set strict maximum residue limits to lower any chance of harm. Still, gaps remain. For example, peer-reviewed studies that track long-term, low-level exposure in people or domestic pets are almost impossible to find. We do know that some triazoles leave residues that stick around, and subtle hormonal shifts might not show up for years. Health agencies in the US, Europe, and Asia all urge caution, regulating sineconazole similarly to other triazoles to err on the side of safety.
Domesticated animals can get exposed, if, say, dogs or livestock graze on or near recently treated fields. No major veterinary studies clearly show big risks to pets or farm animals under normal exposure. Still, cases of accidental large-dose ingestion— like a curious animal chewing into stored crop protection products— can cause vomiting, lethargy, or organ damage, so safe handling and storage always matter. Veterinarians and poison control operators rely on symptoms to guide emergency care, because so little field data exists for sineconazole compared to old-school pesticides.
The safest move comes down to proven steps: strict application rules, only at recommended rates, following legal waiting times before harvesting or allowing animals back onto fields, and solid training for farm workers. Washing produce well helps, too, since surface residues drop with scrubbing. Policymakers need to push for more research, so down the road, families and farmers aren’t guessing about safety based on sketchy or outdated science.
As someone who talks with growers and parents, there’s a growing desire for alternatives. Integrated pest management, selective breeding for disease-resistant crops, and natural antifungal agents could lower the chemical load in our food chain. The best future comes with transparency and investment in independent, peer-reviewed science—not just regulatory estimates or industry guidelines. Until more data enters public hands, people should handle sineconazole with respect and demand clear labeling.
Sineconazole ranks among the triazole fungicides that growers rely on when fighting tough fungal problems. Most people might hear about fungicides on big commercial farms, but the work they do reaches home gardeners and family farms just as much. Throwing out a chemical name might seem distant, but if you’ve ever watched a season’s sweat wiped out by mildew, the question of what a fungicide can do for a crop takes on new weight.
Folks often use sineconazole for its strong effect against powdery mildew, leaf spot, and blight. These diseases hit crops hard like grapes, apples, cucumbers, tomatoes, soybeans, wheat, and ornamentals. Grapevines suffer from powdery mildew year after year in warm, humid summers. Without quick action, that mildew stains fruit, weakens leaves, and ruins whole bunches. I’ve seen local growers forced to throw out entire harvests. Sineconazole offers them an affordable tool to stop fungi before they get a foothold.
In apple orchards, the triazoles keep scab and mildew at bay. Apples fare best with regular, intelligent spray programs that target specific growth stages. Growers usually combine sineconazole applications with strong cultural control – not just relying on sprays, but pruning, removing infected leaves, and rotating other types of fungicides. Blight and early blight in tomatoes often threaten home gardens in wet springs; by protecting flowers and fruit, sineconazole lets tomatoes set and ripen without black spots taking over.
Vegetable producers work with tight profit margins, and the season’s payoff depends on a solid harvest. Cucumbers, grown for pickles or fresh food, fight off downy and powdery mildew, both of which spread like wildfire. Without fungicide intervention, plants wilt, leaves collapse, and fruit never sizes up. Even small application gaps bring big losses.
For wheat and soybean fields, yield losses from fungal infection run into the millions every year. Sineconazole works well in rotation with other products to limit the buildup of resistance, especially against rust, septoria, and fusarium. Using multiple modes of action is key, and failure to rotate products spells disaster over a few seasons.
Sunflowers and canola can suffer fungal leaf spots, which prefer thick plantings with poor airflow. Sineconazole, applied just before or after flowering, can cut these outbreaks short and preserve both seed quality and oil yield. Some extension offices have tracked results, showing significant yield bumps when this fungicide appears in the spray program.
Making sure these chemicals fit real needs calls for judgment. Overuse pushes fungi to adapt, so the best results come when sineconazole shows up as part of a plan using crop rotation and resistant varieties. Local regulations also set limits to protect pollinators, water supplies, and soils. The safety period before harvest gives families and consumers some peace of mind that fresh produce reaches the table free from harmful residues.
Potential Solutions and Responsible PracticesKnowledge keeps family farms and big producers in business. Extension agents, crop consultants, and even seasoned neighbors swap information on best spray intervals and tank mixes. Installing better weather stations, scouting fields often, and keeping spray records helps match treatments like sineconazole to real field conditions—not just spraying out of habit. The future of crop protection depends on education and innovation, helping us grow more food on less land without poisoning the soil beneath our feet. Healthy food starts with these small, everyday decisions, season after season.
Sineconazole stands out as a triazole fungicide developed to protect crops like wheat, barley, and many fruit trees from a spectrum of fungal diseases. Over the years, plenty of research and personal field experience reveals the importance of hitting that recommended dosage spot-on, and not just following the label blindly. Missing the mark creates unnecessary stress for your crops and hurts the land in the long run.
In cereals, Sineconazole dosage usually runs at 60–80 grams of active ingredient per hectare (ai/ha). Grapes and apples often call for a lower range, about 25–40 grams ai/ha because of their sensitivity. Wheat tends to need slightly higher coverage due to its density and risk of powdery mildew. Working with an agronomist who checks the local fungi pressure never hurts. Dosage decisions shouldn’t come from guesswork; regional extension services and updated guidelines from the manufacturer often fine-tune these numbers after field trials.
A key mistake I see across small farms is either over-treating during high disease seasons or under-treating assuming last season’s recipe will work. Neither pays off. Over-application runs up resistance risks and wastes money. Low doses leave crops exposed to rusts or leaf spots. Local extension agents and trusted dealers often update application charts every season, especially after wet springs or shifts in disease patterns.
Ground sprayers allow even coverage and help with drift control. Flat-fan nozzles usually improve coverage, giving each plant surface a fair shot at protection. The label often suggests 200–400 liters of water per hectare for most field crops, which lines up with what you’d see in university-led field workshops. Tank agitation means the chemical doesn’t settle at the bottom—a lesson I learned after one poorly-mixed tank led to patchy control in the back forty. Thorough mixing saves time and hassle. For most orchard setups, higher water volumes push the fungicide deep into the canopy, covering that dense foliage where fungus likes to hide.
Fungicide should go on before symptoms show up. Waiting until leaves start turning blotchy or dusty cuts down your success rate. Sineconazole does have some curative kick, but preventative use pays the biggest dividends. I’ve watched experienced growers stick to scheduled sprays during early leaf emergence and flowering stages, mixing in weather forecasts and previous disease history.
Two years ago, in a local wheat field, disease pressure from powdery mildew jumped after back-to-back seasons of triazole-only management. Rotating other fungicide groups into the plan turned things around. As resistance creeps in, science and real-world results push everyone to use Sineconazole as part of a larger toolbox—never alone, always mixed or alternated with other fungicides.
No fungicide fixes dirty equipment or leftover infected trash. Cleaning gear between fields, burning or composting residue, and giving the ground a break from the same crop each year can lessen the chemical burden. Manufacturers and agricultural researchers keep updating recommendations, adjusting for resistance and environmental risk. Staying connected to credible sources and not sleeping on new updates offers a stronger shield than the strongest chemical will ever give.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | (2R,4S)-1-(4-chlorophenoxy)-4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-one |
| Other names |
BAS 490F Sineconazol |
| Pronunciation | /saɪˈnɛkən.əˌzɒl/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 122333-59-5 |
| 3D model (JSmol) | Here is the 3D model (JSmol) string for the product Sineconazole: ``` CC1=CC(=CN=C1N2CCOCC2)Cl ``` This is the SMILES string representation, which is typically used by JSmol to generate 3D models. |
| Beilstein Reference | 125225 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:85013 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1680307 |
| ChemSpider | 21594251 |
| DrugBank | DB14650 |
| ECHA InfoCard | ECHA InfoCard: 100004-794 |
| EC Number | 85509-19-9 |
| Gmelin Reference | 90633 |
| KEGG | C18350 |
| MeSH | D017948 |
| PubChem CID | 124166 |
| RTECS number | GZ2400000 |
| UNII | S13I16UU9S |
| UN number | Not assigned |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C17H21Cl2N3O2 |
| Molar mass | 346.276 g/mol |
| Appearance | White crystalline powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.23 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble in water |
| log P | 3.61 |
| Vapor pressure | 2.9 × 10⁻⁸ mmHg (25 °C) |
| Acidity (pKa) | 4.9 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 5.03 |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.543 |
| Dipole moment | 3.91 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 393.6 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -8085 kJ/mol |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | D01AC18 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | May cause damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure. Harmful if swallowed. Causes serious eye irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS05, GHS07, GHS08 |
| Pictograms | GHS07,GHS09 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H302, H315, H319, H410 |
| Precautionary statements | P261, P264, P272, P280, P302+P352, P321, P363, P305+P351+P338, P337+P313, P391, P501 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-1-0-~ |
| Flash point | > 162.3 °C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | Oral rat LD50: >5,000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose) of Sineconazole: "Oral, rat: 2200 mg/kg |
| PEL (Permissible) | 0.1 mg/m³ |
| REL (Recommended) | 0.05% |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Cymoxanil Hexaconazole |
