The journey of S-Methyl-N-[(Methylcarbamoyl)Oxy]Thioacetimidate stretches back into the decades when chemists tackled the challenge of designing selective reagents for biochemical research and industrial synthesis. Early literature hinted at the need for thiourea-based compounds that balanced reactivity with a manageable safety profile. Spending some time in university labs, I remember mentors buzzing about new classes of acetimidates capable of precise biochemical modifications. The careers of countless researchers thrived on tweaking these molecules for better performance in fields as diverse as protein chemistry and agrochemicals. This compound, with its unique thioacetimidate group, managed to catch the attention of scientists seeking a tool for targeting specific functional groups under mild conditions—a small but notable revolution for those steeped in the slow progress of organic chemistry methodology.
There’s something refreshing when seeing a compound with distinct selectivity paired with a straightforward synthesis. S-Methyl-N-[(Methylcarbamoyl)Oxy]Thioacetimidate sits in that sweet spot, bridging a gap between more aggressive alkylators and inert bystanders. I’ve watched researchers weigh out white or faintly yellowish crystalline material, always gloved and cautious, yet always appreciative of how well it performed in testing conditions. This compound isn’t just part of a list; it often enters conversations about tuning reaction outcomes and exploring new chemical territory. People use it for targeted modification work—rarely as a commodity, but as a specialist’s tool.
S-Methyl-N-[(Methylcarbamoyl)Oxy]Thioacetimidate presents as a stable crystalline solid under standard conditions. Solubility in common organic solvents often helps when formulating it for lab-scale reactions. Its thioacetimidate moiety tends to react with nucleophiles, providing a versatile functional group for those aiming to attach or detach moieties in protein or molecular biology workflows. Good shelf stability means it's less fussy than some of its cousins, as long as moisture and excess heat stay far away. Anyone with a basic grasp of organic chemistry reads its structure and visualizes the possibilities, knowing a simple shift or twist on that skeleton could create countless analogs. Chemists appreciate how its sulfur and methylcarbamoyl groups work together, each influencing both reactivity and handling requirements.
Accuracy in labeling makes a world of difference in real labs. Details like purity, melting point, and moisture content matter—even a slight miscalculation can derail an experiment or, worse, create a hazard. Laboratories often demand rigorous batch analyses for such chemicals. More than once, I’ve seen a whole research day saved or lost based on a single certificate of analysis lining up—or not—with a product’s stated properties. Regulations on specific labeling flow directly from hard-earned lessons, and most researchers appreciate product transparency more than fancy packaging. This transparency also cuts down the risk of cross-contamination or improper storage, a real concern in crowded research environments.
Synthesis often starts by treating the appropriate thioacetimidate precursor with methyl isocyanate under carefully controlled conditions. Watching the process requires patience and solid protective gear—these are not steps for the distracted or the undertrained. Reaction conditions might shift depending on the route and desired yield, but the basic principles reflect decades of refinement. Mistakes range from poor yields to full-scale lab evacuations if things get out of hand, and even seasoned chemists respect the exothermic steps and volatile intermediates. Success also depends on post-reaction handling, which includes purification by crystallization or chromatography—a process as much art as science. Every chemist with a few syntheses under their belt eventually learns these little battles can shape not just the day’s work, but sometimes an entire research program.
Chemists value S-Methyl-N-[(Methylcarbamoyl)Oxy]Thioacetimidate blueprints for nucleophilic substitution, particularly for selective S-methylation or related transformations in the modification of biomolecules. Its chemical reactivity opens possibilities for creating advanced intermediates, labeling protein thiols, or protecting certain groups during synthetic sequences. I sometimes reflect on experiments where a single step with this chemical brought clarity to reaction mechanisms, yielding products not accessible through older methods. Following a well-designed protocol, researchers adjust temperature, concentration, and solvent to coax optimal performance from every milligram, knowing small changes have a big impact both on outcome and reproducibility. The balancing act between selectivity and reactivity stands at the center of any innovation involving thioacetimidates.
Chemical communication isn’t always straightforward. I’ve seen scientists spend half a morning sorting out if two oddly named bottles actually held the same chemical. S-Methyl-N-[(Methylcarbamoyl)Oxy]Thioacetimidate appears in literature and vendor lists under several names, depending on region, journal, or supplier. Keeping track of such synonyms sometimes feels more like detective work than chemistry. Inconsistent naming had caused mistakes in orders, leading to supply delays or experimental setbacks. For those juggling multiple projects, maintaining a clear cross-reference of product names beats relying on memory or inconsistent labeling. This underscores why clear identifiers such as CAS numbers help create continuity in a fast-moving environment where ambiguity wastes both funds and patience.
Handling potent reagents goes beyond protocol checklists. Direct experience teaches respect for compounds that mix high reactivity with possible toxicity. S-Methyl-N-[(Methylcarbamoyl)Oxy]Thioacetimidate fits that bill: skin contact, inhalation, or improper use can pose serious health risks. Labs enforce fume hoods, gloves, and eyewear, but vigilance remains the most important tool. It’s not just about ticking boxes—the consequences can be immediate and severe. On several occasions, lack of training or distraction around reactive intermediates led to injuries. Anyone who’s mopped up a minor spill, or seen a peer require medical attention, keeps knowledge of chemical hazards front and center. Institutional commitment to ongoing safety education and transparent incident reporting proves essential. Experienced researchers often share cautionary tales with newcomers, passing down experiential knowledge that no textbook fully captures.
Applications for S-Methyl-N-[(Methylcarbamoyl)Oxy]Thioacetimidate range from small-scale analytical chemistry all the way to process development for pharmaceuticals or agrochemical intermediates. In the lab, its role in protein labeling or functional group protection has made it a staple for method development. I've watched teams apply it to probe enzyme mechanisms, analyze site-specific modifications, or prepare tailored intermediates that drive larger synthetic campaigns. This chemical’s selectivity and manageable handling set it apart from harsher counterparts, offering outcomes that matter for both academic and industrial settings. A breakthrough in a single application has sparked waves of new questions and projects, reflecting how small molecular advances echo through broader scientific pursuit.
Research rarely sits still. S-Methyl-N-[(Methylcarbamoyl)Oxy]Thioacetimidate benefits from ongoing investigation into new synthetic pathways, greener preparation methods, and expanded utility in complex organic synthesis. I recall discussions with graduate students mapping out unnatural amino acid analogs or pursuing new bioconjugation techniques that relied on fine-tuning thioacetimidate chemistry. Industry groups dig deeper, searching for ways to scale up production without tradeoffs in quality or safety. The dialogue between academia and industry means any meaningful advance in process control, yield, or reactivity can translate quickly into applied benefits, spurring cross-disciplinary collaborations. Challenges remain, whether related to waste reduction, improved atom economy, or safer intermediates, and the most creative minds continue to push boundaries. It’s an environment where open sharing of both breakthroughs and failures moves the science forward.
Understanding toxicity stands as an evolving challenge. S-Methyl-N-[(Methylcarbamoyl)Oxy]Thioacetimidate, like many reactive reagents, poses health risks not only to immediate users but to the broader environment if mishandled. Toxicological studies focus on acute exposure, chronic effects, and safe degradation pathways. Many in the chemical community keep a close eye on updates, knowing that shifts in regulations or emerging data might impact access or permissible uses. Toxicity data doesn’t just determine laboratory protocols—it shapes manufacturing standards, waste disposal rules, and ultimately public trust in the chemical sciences. Continuous dialogue with regulatory agencies encourages a proactive stance, rather than waiting for problems to surface. Responsible research always integrates safety assessments alongside explorations of chemical performance.
Looking ahead, S-Methyl-N-[(Methylcarbamoyl)Oxy]Thioacetimidate stands poised to benefit from broader shifts in chemistry toward sustainability, higher selectivity, and safer reactivity. Collaboration between synthetic chemists, material scientists, and toxicologists will likely uncover new uses or improved analogs. Advances in predictive modeling promise to reduce risk and speed the identification of ideal conditions for targeted reactions. In my own conversations with researchers, there's optimism for integrating these compounds into more streamlined, waste-reducing processes, and in harnessing their chemistry for even more applications in biotechnology and pharmaceuticals. The relentless curiosity and creativity that drives the field continue to uncover both solutions and challenges, guaranteeing S-Methyl-N-[(Methylcarbamoyl)Oxy]Thioacetimidate will remain part of new chemical stories for years ahead.
S-Methyl-N-[(Methylcarbamoyl)Oxy]Thioacetimidate doesn’t win any prizes for a simple name, but in labs and industry, it gets real work done. This compound pops up most often in the world of crop protection, but its chemistry gives it a wider reach, from fine-tuning pharmaceuticals to acting as a handy intermediate in specialized synthesis. I’ve spent hours paging through scientific studies and industry reviews, and I’ve watched how a chemical like this moves from benchtop curiosity to a workhorse behind the scenes.
The big story starts in agriculture. S-Methyl-N-[(Methylcarbamoyl)Oxy]Thioacetimidate typically serves as an intermediate in producing important insecticides and fungicides. In farms across the globe, food crops get threatened by pests that chew leaves, carry disease, or haunt the soil. Carbamate-based pesticides, which defend plants while trying to stay below toxic thresholds for mammals, often rely on this compound. It helps assemble molecules that eventually land in the field, keeping harvests safe and food prices stable.
Research journals document how the presence of thioacetimidate groups can shift the biological profile of a pesticide molecule, tweaking its mode of action or increasing its selectivity for a particular pest. This kind of engineering reduces collateral damage in the environment. As regulations tighten around pesticide residues, chemical intermediates like S-Methyl-N-[(Methylcarbamoyl)Oxy]Thioacetimidate let chemists keep innovating—aiming to boost crop yields without loading the earth with waste.
Chemists in drug development sometimes need special "building blocks" that let them add new groups or functional pieces to tricky molecules. The S-methyl group introduces sulfur, a feature that can change a compound’s behavior in a human body. Medicinal chemists use this compound’s reactive sites to develop new antibiotics, anti-parasitics, and other experimental drug candidates. Sometimes it shows up as a helper in creating molecules that act on acetylcholinesterase, the enzyme linked to nerve signaling. These compounds appear in treatments for conditions ranging from Alzheimer’s to rare infections.
Bringing any pharmaceutical product to market requires careful control of side reactions, impurities, and environmental impact. The reliability and reactivity of S-Methyl-N-[(Methylcarbamoyl)Oxy]Thioacetimidate help scientists improve yields and limit unpredictable results in large-scale synthesis. This efficiency can shave years and millions off the price tag when a lab moves from pilot runs to clinical-grade products.
My own time in academic labs drove home how much innovation leans on a handful of versatile reagents. Researchers use S-Methyl-N-[(Methylcarbamoyl)Oxy]Thioacetimidate in organic chemistry to modify nitrogen- or sulfur-containing molecules. In hands-on chemistry, that means you can slot it into reactions involving nucleophilic substitutions or acyl transfers. Grad students and professionals reach for it while synthesizing new heterocycles, polymers, and enzyme inhibitors.
Every researcher knows regulatory pressure shapes which synthetic routes survive and which fade away. With stricter limits on hazardous byproducts, the chemical’s value lies in clean reactivity and safety under laboratory conditions. Waste handling and environmental controls push manufacturers and scientists to revisit old synthesis plans, pushing for greener methods. Looking ahead, better hazard data and more refined methods could make even broader use of this compound possible, not just in big factories but in decentralized, small-batch labs tackling urgent problems.
Keeping these uses responsible means supporting ongoing studies into toxicity, environmental impact, and residue breakdown. Universities and industry together can keep inventories updated, run toxicity trials, and back the search for even more sustainable approaches in both agriculture and medicine.
Chemistry packs a punch with a simple concept: the arrangement of atoms inside a molecule shapes everything about a compound. The chemical structure acts like a fingerprint. Mess around with it, and you end up with something completely different. Even moving one tiny atom can flip a medicine from life-saving to useless, or a sweetener into something bitter. It’s not just a chemistry lesson. Over years of working in labs, I’ve seen how one look at a structure tells you about reactivity, stability, or what that chemical will do in the real world. Think of acetaminophen and phenacetin—just a difference of an oxygen atom, but acetaminophen is safe on your liver at over-the-counter doses, while phenacetin is now banned because of toxicity concerns.
Every compound has a specific molecular weight, which depends on the types and numbers of atoms in its structure. Calculating molecular weight is not complicated—sum up the atomic weights from the periodic table for every atom in the molecule. A compound’s molecular weight does more than fill out a spec sheet. It decides how a chemical travels through the body, if a drug can sneak through the blood-brain barrier, or how a material holds up in the environment. In the pharmaceutical world, the U.S. FDA keeps a close eye on molecular weight since it can tip off whether a drug will move efficiently through membranes and get to where it’s needed in the body.
Everyday work in the lab means paying close attention to small details in structure and weight. During my time as a research assistant, it became clear to me how even a single extra carbon atom in a structure can bump up the molecular weight and wreck a whole synthesis. That mistake can throw off yield, impact safety, or even shut down a project. In industry, measuring molecular weight is a routine step before moving forward to animal or human studies. There’s no room for error, because an off calculation can waste months of work and cost thousands of dollars. The famous thalidomide tragedy of the 1960s happened partly because researchers didn’t understand how slight changes in structure and weight could change how the chemical behaved inside the human body.
Good chemistry demands more than a formula—it demands verification. Teams today lean on modern techniques like NMR, mass spectrometry, or X-ray crystallography to confirm both structure and weight. I learned the hard way during my studies: you always double-check, then check again. Mistakes do not just cost time—they can put lives at risk. In chemical manufacturing, oversight from regulatory agencies ensures fewer mistakes slip through. That builds trust, not just among fellow scientists but for consumers and patients down the line.
Getting more people interested in chemical structures and molecular weights bridges the gap between the lab and real-world impact. Encouraging students to read product safety sheets and dig into case studies brings home the importance of precision and understanding. Universities offering hands-on lab work, or industry internships, can help demystify the concept. The world needs chemists who will take the time, run the calculations, and make sure no step in the process gets skipped.
Progress doesn’t happen solo. Chemists must work closely with regulators, doctors, engineers, and even consumers to make sure everyone is on the same page about what’s in a compound and what it means for safety. Better communication, robust documentation, and easy access to verified databases move the discipline forward. In my experience, teams sharing information openly always reach the best solutions, because confusion shrinks and good science wins out.
Storage and handling can make or break the quality and safety of just about any product, whether food, medicine, or chemicals. Growing up in a family that ran a small grocery store, I saw firsthand how temperature can turn a crate of apples into mush or a bottle of milk into a science experiment overnight. Nobody wants to see their hard work go to waste—and more importantly, nobody wants to put anyone’s health at risk.
Ask anyone in the food business if they’ve ever had to throw out a week’s worth of meat due to a fridge breakdown. The answer’s going to be a grim yes. Warehouses keep products cooled or frozen not just because it’s a rule, but because past failures taught hard lessons. Dairy warms up? Expect sour milk. Medication exposed to sunlight? Patients might not get the benefit they need—or worse, get hurt.
Mistakes don’t just cost money. One incident can chip away at trust built over years with consumers. Just look at recalls tracked by the Food and Drug Administration: temperature abuse, contamination—all traced back to simple storage or handling errors.
Most products come with instructions for a reason. Insulin won’t work as intended if left out too long, and nobody wants salmonella from chicken left at room temperature. Temperature and humidity guidelines are not some bureaucratic hoop, but the result of years of study and real-world trial and error. Every shipment carries built-in expectations: jam stays cool; paint stands away from heat sources; batteries avoid freezing temps.
I’ve seen small business owners try to cut corners—storing cleaning chemicals near produce, stacking fragile goods too high. That path leads to disaster, or at the very least, a complaint on social media that sends customers running elsewhere. Sometimes, old habits die hard, but change often arrives through tough experiences or strict inspections.
Heat speeds up spoilage and chemical reactions, so unrefrigerated products lose shelf life and potency or even become harmful. Dampness encourages mold and rust. Poor ventilation makes fire chances soar, especially if flammable products sit together. In my work with local manufacturers, we found a few near misses—cases where a forgotten drum of solvent lingered near a heat source. All it took was someone noticing an odd smell before things turned serious.
Education matters—posting clear signs in storerooms, holding regular training updates, promoting a culture where anyone can call out a problem. Thermometers and hygrometers aren’t expensive, yet they save thousands in spoiled product. Rotating stock is basic advice, but it works—new deliveries go behind the old, so nothing expires unseen. Barcode systems help track dates and cut down on human error.
Making someone responsible for daily checks brings accountability. That could be an employee at a retail store, a warehouse supervisor, or even the business owner. Don’t underestimate the impact of investing in proper shelving, reliable refrigeration, and emergency plans. Fires, floods, and power failures happen—with backup generators or insurance, the business can bounce back faster.
The way we store and handle products protects the public, the business, and the reputation built over time. Every skipped step raises risk, and every careful measure builds trust. Nothing beats getting it right the first time—because in storage and handling, there are rarely second chances.
People often glaze over when they see a chemical name like S-Methyl-N-[(Methylcarbamoyl)Oxy]Thioacetimidate. It’s not a name you might find on a grocery shelf, and that only seems to add to the confusion about how toxic or hazardous it might be. Many complex-sounding chemicals float through various industries, especially agriculture or manufacturing. Their risk comes down to what happens after the cap comes off or a sprayer switches on—how the body handles exposure or how it lingers in the environment.
Every time I see a new study surface about an unfamiliar compound, the question turns to data. Researchers tend to focus on how these substances affect skin, lungs, and long-term body systems. The thioacetimidate group in this compound points towards reactivity—this class often interacts strongly with biological molecules. The “carbamoyl” part suggests a sibling relationship to carbamate pesticides, many of which target nerves in insects and, sometimes, humans. These structural bits often hint at risk toward our central nervous systems. The toxic profiles of similar chemicals include headaches, nausea, dizziness, and, at higher exposures, respiratory problems.
Some regulatory databases show limited toxicity information. Often, these listings remain outdated while the world rushes to fill knowledge gaps. If it acts like other carbamates, even accidental skin contact can set off symptoms. Spills or improper application increase risk, especially for farm workers. Inhalation would send those molecules across lung surfaces and into blood quickly. Repeated low-level exposure remains a bigger concern in real-world conditions than high doses, which pop up in lab settings.
Growing up around old farm equipment, I watched neighbors treat their land with little more than a paper mask between them and a cloud of spray. Years later, I saw scars on hands and stories behind chronic coughs. Chemicals with thioacetimidate or carbamate roots often land on lists for caution. Safety Data Sheets, when available, underline the need for gloves, goggles, and prompt cleanup. Trouble is, those warnings sometimes get skimmed or ignored under pressure to finish a job quickly.
Various agencies, like the EPA or ECHA, encourage manufacturers to perform more toxicity tests and give clearer guidance. Downtime between approval and new results leads to exposures that could fly under the radar. Luckily, policy pushes toward stricter evaluation and labeling. Testing water run-off, following medical surveillance programs, and providing better training go far toward protecting the most vulnerable. Automation and protective gear matter, too—nobody expects to swap health for productivity.
Responsible use of any potent chemical means knowing what you’re handling. Full test results need to reach decision-makers and the workers who have most skin in the game. Even when research gaps loom, precaution must guide behavior. Community health demands transparency: clear labels, honest risk talks, and responsive healthcare. Families and workers deserve more than a gamble simply because a molecule’s story hasn’t reached every doorstep.
Checking an expiry date happens almost out of habit. The truth is, shelf life describes more than an arbitrary period printed on packing. It says a lot about whether what you buy will actually do what you expect—or worse, if it might cause harm. I've seen people ignore shelf life only to throw out entire batches of food or medicine weeks later. That mistake costs money and sometimes health.
Chemistry doesn’t stop after a product leaves the factory. Whether you keep tablets or salad dressing, time takes a toll. Vitamins lose strength in a humid kitchen. Cooking oil may go rancid sooner on a sunny shelf. My own antihistamines once smelled off after sitting in the glove compartment for a summer. Heat and light turned them chalky and unpredictable. Nobody wants to risk a weak or risky dose in a crunch.
I once assumed a sealed jar meant everything inside lasted forever. I learned the hard way with paint thinner leaking out within a year—not because the chemical broke down, but because the cap just wasn’t tight enough. Good packaging blocks out oxygen, sunlight, and moisture. Even simple things like glass bottles for olive oil or foil for chocolate aren't just for looks. They slow down the chemical reactions ruining freshness or turning flavor sour.
Stable temperature keeps food safe, pills reliable, and even batteries useful. Moving stored cans from the basement to the hot garage may shave months off their safe window. Frozen berries might last a year at -18°C, but in the frost-prone section of a home freezer, ice crystals and wilted texture sneak in much sooner. Pharmacy guidelines hammer home: keep insulin cold, sunscreen away from heaters, and eye drops in their box. Each new temperature swing pushes decay forward.
Factories don’t just guess how long soap, milk, or lotion stay safe. Stability testing gets technical. Batches age under different conditions. Experts measure changes in smell, color, strength, or texture, sometimes speeding up aging with heat and humidity for faster results. Some supplements last six months, others three years, based on real chemical proof—not wishful guessing. Talented quality control staff dig into product complaints and recall history when crafting recommendations.
I started storing bread in the freezer after mold ate three loaves in a row during the rainy season. Buying smaller packages made more sense than hunting for preservatives I couldn't pronounce. Hospitals track expiry dates obsessively, discarding anything old enough to invite lawsuits, and most professionals agree—the best bet is to stick close to guidelines set by science.
Shoppers can extend shelf life at home by following smart storage tips right away: dry, cool, and dark spots slow spoilage. Choosing resealable packaging, splitting bulk amounts, and paying attention to “best by” dates saves money in the long run. Industries can improve by testing products with real-world stress, not just in perfect labs. Grocery stores have begun offering education with food labeling, making it easier for families to avoid waste. Trust grows when brands communicate risks and quality openly—from pharmaceuticals down to pickles.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | S-methyl N-[(methylcarbamoyl)oxy]ethanimidothioate |
| Other names |
Methomyl Lannate Mesomy Methomex Metomil Methomylate |
| Pronunciation | /ɛs-ˈmɛθɪl-ɛn-ˈmɛθɪlˌkɑːr.bəˌmɔɪl-ˈɒksi-θaɪ.oʊˈæs.əˌtɪm.ɪˌdeɪt/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 65141-46-0 |
| 3D model (JSmol) | `CN(C(=O)ON=C(SC)C)C` |
| Beilstein Reference | 136915 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:87211 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL2103837 |
| ChemSpider | 128351 |
| DrugBank | DB08617 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03d9a958-0337-455f-acce-851869400043 |
| EC Number | EC 3.5.1.110 |
| Gmelin Reference | 55813 |
| KEGG | C07398 |
| MeSH | D002717 |
| PubChem CID | 4586887 |
| RTECS number | DJ3325000 |
| UNII | 2Z48BO3Z6C |
| UN number | 2811 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C5H10N2O2S |
| Molar mass | 179.22 g/mol |
| Appearance | white solid |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.25 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Slightly soluble |
| log P | 0.10 |
| Vapor pressure | 3.1 × 10⁻⁷ mmHg (25°C) |
| Acidity (pKa) | 12.2 |
| Basicity (pKb) | Product S-Methyl-N-[(Methylcarbamoyl)Oxy]Thioacetimidate has a pKb value of 11.6 |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.567 |
| Dipole moment | 3.73 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 385.7 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -180.2 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -907.9 kJ·mol⁻¹ |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | N01AX10 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | Harmful if swallowed. Causes skin and eye irritation. May cause respiratory irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS02, GHS07 |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Signal word | Danger |
| Hazard statements | H301, H319, H331, H410 |
| Precautionary statements | P261, P264, P270, P271, P272, P273, P280, P302+P352, P304+P340, P305+P351+P338, P310, P321, P330, P363, P391, P403+P233, P405, P501 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 2-2-2 |
| Flash point | Flash point: 82.8 °C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 oral rat 8 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): 15 mg/kg |
| NIOSH | PC8225000 |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not Established |
| REL (Recommended) | 0.01 mg/kg |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not established |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Methomyl Aldicarb Thioacetamide Oxamyl Carbofuran Carbaryl |