© 2026 Sinochem Nanjing Corporation,
All Right Reserved
Not every chemical makes the leap from the lab bench to industrial relevance, and P-Menthyl Hydroperoxide’s story reflects that. Born in the thick of organic peroxide research, it sprang out of curiosity for monoterpenoid modifications that could broaden synthetic possibilities. During the days when organic peroxides started gaining traction—think early 20th century, as chemists searched for new oxidants—P-Menthyl Hydroperoxide offered a unique bridge between natural aroma chemicals and the demanding needs of selective oxidation in organic synthesis. Its appearance in early patents, tied to flavor, fragrance, and polymer chemistry, signaled the chemistry community's drive to shape versatile molecules for both innovation and problem-solving. In the decades that followed, the substance traded its obscurity for a place in pilot plants and production lines, mostly as a specialty chemical rather than a bulk commodity, but impactful nonetheless.
On most days, P-Menthyl Hydroperoxide gets less attention than mainstream peroxides like benzoyl peroxide or cumene hydroperoxide. Yet, it fills a gap that bigger players leave open. Its roots trace back to menthene, which already shapes industries from flavorings to hygiene products, but here, a peroxide group transforms it from a pleasant-smelling hydrocarbon into a reactive tool. Factories and research labs value it mostly for its ability to promote radical reactions and act as an initiator. Beyond its chemistry, this compound illustrates the broader trend where nature-inspired molecules become central to the modern chemical toolset—always on hand for tweaking and reformulating processes that range from pharmaceuticals to plastics.
With P-Menthyl Hydroperoxide, labs face the classic peroxide trade-offs—strong enough to be reactive, but sensitive enough to demand respect. Its concentration here, between 72% and 100%, means any sloppiness can tip from safe handling into disaster territory. Sitting as a mostly clear, sometimes faintly yellow liquid, the real challenge involves its high energy oxygen bonds. Anyone who works with organic peroxides recognizes the risky blend: low flash points, propensity for decomposition, and the constant threat of runaway reactivity if mixed with incompatible materials or exposed to heat. Unlike less-reactive chemicals that can sit idle on a shelf, this peroxide’s energetic structure needs vigilant handling, grounding in physical chemistry, and reliable storage procedures. Its density, boiling point, and volatility all mean more than textbook numbers—they shape transport, storage, and day-to-day operations, affecting both cost and safety with every shipment.
Chemicals like this don’t glide through distribution under generic tags. Regulations call for clear content marking—especially with a peroxide that hits or exceeds 72% purity, since concentration isn’t just a spec but a risk marker. Shipping containers demand red diamond hazard labels; each drum travels with paperwork citing regulatory codes, reactive classifications, and temperature storage rules. The push for transparent labeling grows from a reality where minor mishandling can spiral into serious accidents. My own experience underscores this: I’ve seen seasoned professionals double-check documentation, questioning even familiar drums, because in the world of high-concentration peroxides, cutting corners never ends well. Such scrutiny protects everyone down the supply chain—lab workers, transporters, technicians—keeping awareness sharp and accountability high.
Most P-Menthyl Hydroperoxide comes to life through direct oxidation of menthene or similar monoterpenes, typically using hydrogen peroxide and catalytic tweaks that date back to mid-20th-century industrial fermentation techniques. The move from bench-scale glassware to industrial reactors demands careful temperature control, selection of catalysts, and efficient separation of product from byproducts. In real-life settings, the challenge often lies in maximizing yield without caving to thermal decomposition or runaway pressure. There’s no room for complacency—over-oxidized waste spells lost revenue and hazardous disposal headaches. Chemists have spent decades streamlining the balance between reactivity and stability, searching for process improvements that shave off costs or squeeze out higher purity. Each tweak—new solvents, better phase transfer catalysts, continuous-flow techniques—spends months in pilot-scale testing before approval, making technical progress a slow, cumulative process where hard lessons from past accidents feed future best practices.
The reason P-Menthyl Hydroperoxide stands out has less to do with its fame and more with its ability to drive specific transformations. Chemists reach for it when selective oxidations could bump up yields or when initiating radical polymerizations that other peroxides can’t control as finely. In practice, its unique structure, with a tertiary or secondary hydroperoxide on a bulky ring, alters reaction rates and byproduct profiles in ways more common peroxides don’t. The peroxide group breaks down easily, releasing radical intermediates that spark controlled chain reactions. Over the years, I’ve seen labs explore modifications such as partial reduction, grafting onto polymers, and coupling with other monoterpenes to create specialty additives or stepwise oxidation products. Real manufacturing constraints—cost, environmental limits, waste minimization—almost always drive these modifications as much as pure scientific curiosity.
Anyone who’s ordered chemicals for a project knows the headaches caused by inconsistent naming. P-Menthyl Hydroperoxide, thanks to its terpene roots and oxygen content, appears under several aliases in catalogs and scientific papers. The most common synonyms refer to its menthene heritage or describe its place as a hydroperoxide derivative. Cross-checking product names and registry numbers becomes an everyday task, not out of bureaucratic habit, but to avoid mix-ups that can derail experiments or, far worse, result in mishandling reactive compounds under the wrong guidelines. Industry voices push for more unified nomenclature, but the reality still involves double-checking every shipment for clarity, regardless of regulatory harmonization efforts.
Some folks assume chemical safety stops at gloves and goggles, but ask anyone familiar with high-concentration peroxides and you’ll hear war stories that go deeper. Working with P-Menthyl Hydroperoxide means going way beyond minimum PPE, since even small spills or mishandled bottles spell real injury threats. Facilities handling this material need strict temperature controls—often refrigerated storage, grounded containers, dedicated ventilation—and ongoing worker training. Regulations from agencies like OSHA and international transport bodies aren’t just bureaucratic hurdles; they trace directly back to avoidable disasters. Over years of consulting, I’ve watched labs change layouts just to separate peroxides from flammable solvents or acids, a physical reminder that best practices evolve through shared lessons, not just reading the handbook. Audits and drills—sometimes greeted with a groan—keep teams ready for worst-case scenarios. Failure to treat safety standards seriously always finds a way to exact a price, either in fines or, in rare cases, injuries that stick in a team’s collective memory.
Here’s where the impact shows its breadth. P-Menthyl Hydroperoxide’s strongest suit comes from its ability to start reactions that shape modern life, from building block chemicals in perfumery to initiators in advanced plastics. Industries add it as a radical initiator in resin curing or elastomer production, picking it for the control it offers in specific reaction windows. In pharmaceutical syntheses, the compound shows up as both a reagent and an intermediate—less in drug production lines but more in designing new synthetic routes or fine-tuning oxidative steps that unlock value from herbal precursors. The flavors and fragrances folks experiment with it as an oxidant for tailoring aroma molecules, banking on its ability to add oxygen without destroying desirable ring structures. Though it’s rarely used on the scale of household name chemicals, each application draws on its nuanced reactivity—squeezing cost, yield, or specificity in sectors that rely on pro-level chemical engineering.
Despite its age, P-Menthyl Hydroperoxide keeps researchers curious because chemical innovation is always about old tools in new hands. Academic groups and industry labs sometimes return to it searching for greener syntheses or safer alternatives to harsh oxidants. Studies focus on catalytic pathways that lower energy use, reduce hazardous byproducts—or open up new oxidation states for natural products. Some teams tweak its structure chasing selectivity, while others build on its safety profile, measuring decomposition kinetics and breakdown pathways to inform bigger initiatives in sustainable chemical manufacturing. Collaborations between universities and companies bridge theory and practice, prioritizing ways to capture value and reduce incident rates. Small data points from pilot experiments—how much heat, what byproduct mix, how to scrub emissions—feed massive models for process scale-up or environmental compliance, showing that even a well-known compound gathers new relevance with each technological turn.
Nobody longs for the chance to handle peroxides carelessly, since their reputation for toxicity and instability always lurks in the background. Studies on P-Menthyl Hydroperoxide highlight both acute and chronic exposure risks, with local irritation and systemic effects marking the clear boundaries for safe use. Animal studies, worker health records, and environmental tests build the case for tight exposure limits. Experiences on the factory floor testify to the need for engineered safeguards—fume hoods, robust venting, emergency protocols—not makeshift solutions. Firms invest in third-party toxicity reviews, spurred by both regulatory compliance and the hard truths from accident records. For end-users, the challenge lies in balancing chemical utility with ethical responsibility: transparent reporting, continuous education, and improvements in both substitution and personal protection all play into the everyday task of keeping the workforce healthy.
P-Menthyl Hydroperoxide’s future won’t unfold in isolation. Changes in environmental guidelines, advances in synthetic methods, and shifts in industrial demand will all reshape its spot in the chemical landscape. More efficient production routes, backed by smarter catalysis and in-line monitoring, may drop costs or build in safety without sacrificing reactivity. As industries chase sustainability, pressure to replace high-risk chemicals or build closed-loop systems ramps up, prompting both big investments and small process tweaks. Chemical engineers and policymakers often clash over acceptable risk, but the conversation moves forward as new data guides better decisions. The compound’s unique reactivity keeps it in play, especially where tailor-made molecules or specialty oxidations still create enough value to justify extra handling constraints. As my own career has shown, even low-profile chemicals can spark fresh thinking and foster dialogue—between generations, across industries, and throughout the global supply chain—on what responsible chemistry truly means.
P-Menthyl hydroperoxide, often used at high concentrations, finds its biggest demand in the polymer industry. Factories making plastics and synthetic rubbers choose this compound for one important reason: it starts the chemical reaction that turns monomers into the everyday materials we rely on. Without a solid initiator, a process can waste energy and resources or leave companies stuck with low-quality products. Over decades, companies trust this substance to deliver predictable polymerization – a process that’s part science, part craft, and deeply tied to cost and safety.
Your food packaging, vehicle parts, insulation, even sports gear – a lot of this begins with controlled chemical reactions. P-Menthyl hydroperoxide proves valuable because it kicks off these reactions at moderate temperatures. Manufacturers gain flexibility to fine-tune their process, lowering energy bills and reducing factory emissions. Compared to older or less stable initiators, P-Menthyl hydroperoxide offers reliability and a longer shelf life in the storeroom. This stability makes a difference where supply chains run tight and waste management costs keep rising.
Companies focus on safety standards and worker training because storing and handling this chemical demands respect. It reacts eagerly and needs cool, dry, well-ventilated storage, the right personal protective equipment, and trained hands. Mistakes carry a risk that nobody ignores. Industry standards keep evolving, pushing companies to review their protocols as regulations and best practices tighten globally.
Modern factories don’t look only at what works today; they need tomorrow’s breakthroughs. Even with high performance, P-Menthyl hydroperoxide’s toxicological and environmental profile stays under scrutiny. Engineers work to recycle where possible, reuse what’s safe, and contain anything hazardous. Disposal specialists ensure no uncontrolled release happens, as per environmental law and community standards. The chemistry world, from Germany to Japan to the United States, continues searching for even safer, greener options – but for now, this hydroperoxide sits on the workbench because it bridges performance and cost-efficiency in ways that others can’t yet match.
P-Menthyl hydroperoxide gives industries the leverage to produce everything from car tires to adhesives at scale, with consistent results. At the same time, the pressure grows to shift toward molecules that hold less danger for workers and the environment. Some projects look at alternative technologies like photoinitiated polymerization — harnessing UV light, for example, instead of chemical triggers. Others invest in catalyst development or biodegradable polymers, hoping to cut down on hazardous inputs altogether. These alternatives still run into hurdles on price and performance, though a few are getting closer to catching up.
Relying on a chemical like this might not sound glamorous, but it’s the nuts-and-bolts stuff behind big industries, shaping both safety practices and new product development. I’ve seen engineers debate for hours over one change in a process like this, weighing cost, yield, risk, and even how it fits with long-term environmental commitments.
P-Menthyl hydroperoxide stands as a workhorse in today’s industrial economy, especially where polymerization matters. It gives manufacturers tools to build materials more efficiently, at lower energy use, while also reminding everyone of the balance between productivity and safety. As green chemistry advances, the chemistry field keeps asking the tough questions: Can we do better, both for the planet and for workers on the factory floor? Until then, this chemical plays its part every day, shaping the world behind the scenes.
P-Menthyl hydroperoxide, a clear organic peroxide, shows up most often in polymerization processes and the synthesis of various chemicals. The high energy stored in the molecule means it can kick off fierce reactions with little provocation. Having worked in chemical storage, I’ve seen how mishandling even small volumes can create big problems, not just property damage but lasting harm to people.
At typical industrial concentrations, this chemical sits in a risky spot: unstable enough to degrade if left exposed to sunlight, heat, or friction. Once, a warehouse near our facility overlooked temperature controls, and a batch of organics turned dangerous as heat built up over a weekend. The incident led to new guidelines that shaped our region’s safety standards.
Organic peroxides like P-menthyl hydroperoxide demand a cool, shaded environment. Factories usually set the storage temperature below 30°C. In summer, cooling systems become critical. I remember walking into storerooms where thermometer checks were part of my daily routine. If the digital gauge read too close to the danger zone, we’d move quickly to shore up the cooling or organize a transfer. Sometimes all it takes is a busted air conditioning unit to put barrels at risk.
Direct sunlight speeds up decomposition. Shelving or storage bins should sit away from south-facing walls or skylights. Any spark, even static from dragging a synthetic drum across the floor, can be an ignition source. Earthing straps and anti-static mats do their part to drop risks to a manageable level.
Steel drums or high-density polyethylene containers usually serve well, provided they seal tight and resist swelling. Years ago, I watched as a cracked seal let vapors seep into a storeroom. The resulting fumes triggered detector alarms and forced a hasty evacuation. That day underlined just how much hinges on regular inspection.
Peroxide containers stay well apart from acids, bases, and combustible materials. I’ve seen charts that map out separation distances right on storeroom walls. A lapse in layout—not just stacking incompatible drums but setting spill containment trays where different liquids might mix—can create volatile scenarios.
Personal protective equipment forms a real shield for workers: gloves with good chemical resistance, goggles, long sleeves, and face shields serve as the bare minimum. Emergency showers and eye wash stations need to stay clear, unblocked by boxes or carts. Training helps: I once worked under a supervisor who drilled us monthly, turning chemical handling into muscle memory.
Spills shouldn’t linger. We kept absorbent kits by the entry, stocked with vermiculite and neutral containers for waste. No regular paper towels or shop rags—those can ignite once they soak up enough peroxide. Designated waste bins and frequent removal set the rhythm for a safer workday.
Automated temperature monitors, alarmed for out-of-range conditions, reduce human error. Digital inventory logs flag shelf-life issues; stocks rotate before aging past their peak. Regular training and routine audits catch problems before they multiply. As someone who’s seen technology shift the landscape, I know these steps anchor trust not just in internal safety, but in the eyes of clients and regulators watching from outside.
Working with P-Menthyl Hydroperoxide at high concentrations puts both people and property at real risk. This compound carries serious hazards—its volatility and oxidative power can lead to burns, explosions, or even toxic fumes. I remember stories from the lab about mishandled peroxides. One colleague once startled the entire floor with a tiny spill that fizzed alarmingly before getting neutralized. That sort of wake-up call stays with you.
This chemical burns on contact. I’ve seen what happens when someone “just has to grab something quick” without gloves. It’s not worth it. Always use chemical-resistant gloves every time a container opens. Lab coats and splash-proof goggles aren’t fashion choices—without them, a splash can blind or scar for life. Face shields make a difference if there’s any risk of pressure buildup or splattering. No one ever regrets being over-prepared.
Vapors from strong peroxides can hurt lungs and throat. Use a chemical fume hood. At home, no room ever matches the suction and ventilation of lab equipment. For fieldwork, a respirator with organic vapor cartridges keeps airways clear. Never trust a stuffy storage room—the risk goes up with poor air flow.
Nobody wants a spill. Accidents happen fast: a bottle gets nudged, a pipette tips over. Rather than panic, reach for sand, inert absorbents, or specific peroxide cleanup kits. Just water won’t cut it—sometimes it triggers more reaction. Sweep up; don’t mop. Dry surfaces avoid further breakdown or vapor. Follow any spill by alerting everyone and airing out the space fully before letting folks back in.
Temperature swings spell danger for peroxides. Keep them cool but never freeze. Separate storage cabinets—built to resist fire and corrosion—stay far from fuels, metals, acids, and sunlight. Every year, check labels and inventory to spot crusting, discoloration, or weird odors. That change could mean instability. Disposal then becomes urgent, since old peroxides sometimes detonate without warning. At one lab, we built a habit of dating every container on receipt and using the oldest first. No surprises that way.
No safety plan replaces good training. Anyone working with P-Menthyl Hydroperoxide should have clear instructions: how to store, transfer, and clean up safely. Drills help. If someone freezes in a crisis, seconds disappear that could save a hand or an eye. Local emergency contacts stay posted everywhere chemicals live. After years of working with hazardous materials, I trust muscle memory and practice over paperwork every time.
Never pour peroxides down the drain or into garbage. Professional waste contractors protect both the handler and the environment. Document every disposal. Illegal or careless dumping leads to fires, poisonings, and long-term pollution. Communities pay for every shortcut in this department. Talk to waste companies that handle oxidizers, and don’t take their advice lightly.
Personal attention trumps technology for safety. Staying alert to smells, leaks, and packaging changes keeps everyone one step ahead. Safety isn’t a checklist for P-Menthyl Hydroperoxide; it’s a practiced habit. Complacency leads to accidents, and no lab, workshop, or plant is immune. Learn the signs of instability, and use the best protection. Safety gear gathers dust for weeks, then changes a life in one incident. That fact sticks with me every time I see peroxide on the shelf.
P-Menthyl hydroperoxide doesn’t belong in anyone’s air or on anyone’s skin. It works as a strong oxidizer. You can spot the symptoms on a worker almost right away: irritation on the skin, trouble breathing. P-Menthyl hydroperoxide leaks quickly become an emergency. I learned early, working in a paint plant, that hesitating after a spill only makes cleanup tougher. Higher risk comes with waiting, both for people and property. Evacuate the area fast if the spill’s not tiny or if the air smells sharp. Once, after someone knocked a half-liter bottle, fumes chased us out before we could grab a mop.
Direct splashes cause chemical burns. If someone gets exposed, the clock ticks—water becomes the best friend. Flush out eyes under running water for at least fifteen minutes. Nobody forgets the first time a lab mate needed an eyewash station. Take off any contaminated clothing right away. Avoid giving ointments or neutralizers, since some interact with peroxides. Heading to a medical professional gives the best chance to prevent permanent damage. Have emergency showers and eyewash stations ready, not hidden in a locked closet. Outdated or blocked stations tip the balance from minor injury to disaster.
Picture liquid spreading across a concrete floor. If absorbent materials are close by—vermiculite, sand, or spill pillows—use them fast to surround and contain the fluid. Never use sawdust, rags, or anything oily, which could start a fire or even an explosion. Shoveling up the soaked material into a sealed drum or plastic container, keeping clear of skin contact, stays vital. Experience in a production setting showed that getting everyone trained on spill kits takes just an hour, yet makes the difference between a few minutes’ inconvenience and a shutdown. Relying on luck is not a plan.
People sometimes forget that p-menthyl hydroperoxide forms vapors heavier than air, which pool near the ground and quickly build up to dangerous levels. The right way means good ventilation and calling in professionals if the spill tops a few liters or winds up in a hard-to-reach place. Forgetting to clear the area of sparks, open flames, or even electric tools spells trouble with such a strong oxidizer. At my old job, a poorly vented spill in a storeroom almost brought down the fire alarm with close to no warning. Warehouse fans and smoke detectors are cheap compared to a total loss.
Basic training usually outperforms “common sense.” Put clear, unmissable labels on every container of p-menthyl hydroperoxide. Share the material safety data sheet at every staff meeting, not just during onboarding. Encourage everyone to speak up if they see careless handling or shortcuts during cleanup. In places where people feel safe reporting problems, fewer incidents happen. Double-checking emergency showers, spill kits, and proper storage seems boring—right up until something leaks. Routines save lives. Real experience drives home how following procedures transforms panic into a controlled response.
Responding to a spill of p-menthyl hydroperoxide asks for preparedness, speed, and teamwork. Keeping chemicals labeled, first aid close, and everyone trained builds a solid defense. Cutting corners, ignoring warning signs, or skimping on protection only invites trouble. Managing risk isn’t about hoping nothing goes wrong; it’s about expecting the unexpected and responding together with clear heads and steady hands. That keeps both people and production safe.
P-Menthyl hydroperoxide packs a powerful punch as an oxidizing agent. Its high reactivity calls for serious attention to how it’s packaged and stored. A few years back, I worked in a chemical plant where a shipment of organic peroxide arrived in unsuitable plastic drums. That mistake kept us on our toes for weeks, because certain plastics and metals turn this chemical from useful to dangerous very fast. Reliable knowledge about packaging can make the difference between safe storage and a disastrous leak.
At the plant, we stuck to packaging that handled peroxides well. P-Menthyl hydroperoxide responds badly to common metals like iron, copper, or brass. These metals can trigger decomposition and cause leaks, fumes, and sometimes even fire. Stainless steel lures some into thinking it works for every chemical, but even 304 and 316 grades corrode slowly with concentrated organic peroxides like this one. Corrosion eats through tanks before you realize, so metal drums stay out of the mix.
Strong plastic, on the other hand, offers much more peace of mind. High-density polyethylene (HDPE) remains the best choice. At our plant, HDPE drums with sturdy screw-top lids never broke down or softened, even during the hottest summer months. Polypropylene works nearly as well, especially for inner linings or transfer hoses in the filling area. Both materials resist oxidation and keep the peroxide away from other chemicals or vapors.
I remember reading a review from the European Chemicals Agency and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA): both recommend HDPE as the gold standard for organic peroxide containment. This guidance reflects tests that measure long-term exposure, heat buildup, and the tendency of the chemical to degrade materials. I’ve seen drums stored for over a year with no visible damage or seepage, which builds real confidence.
Low-grade polymer like PVC and everyday PET bottles don’t stand up to p-menthyl hydroperoxide. The chemical seeps through PET over months, risking leaks. We once saw a sample stored in glass for short-term lab use, but thermal shock shattered a jar on a chilly day, spilling strong fumes in the prep room. Peroxides, especially in higher concentrations, demand a material that won’t crack, corrode, or allow breath-through over time.
Rubber gaskets or seals with natural latex or nitrile also spell trouble. Swelling, softening, and slow disintegration create poor seals and clogs. Quality packaging uses PTFE (Teflon) gaskets for their resistance to oxidation and lack of reactivity. Steel clamps or metal caps get a Teflon or plastic liner to keep the peroxide away from the bare metal.
Proper packaging isn’t the only hurdle. Clear chemical labeling, hazard signage, and recording the concentration sit at the core of safety. Most accidents link back to confusion over contents or improper mixing. At the end of the day, safe chemical handling benefits from the steady application of simple rules: choose HDPE, use the right gaskets, keep it cool, and never trust a drum or liner that’s not certified for oxidizers.
The right packaging—backed by workplace experience and regulatory guidance—keeps both workers and the world outside the plant safer.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | 2-Isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl hydroperoxide |
| Other names |
alpha,alpha,4-Trimethylcyclohexanemethanol hydroperoxide Cumenyl Hydroperoxide Menthol hydroperoxide p-Menthylhydroperoxide |
| Pronunciation | /ˌpiːˈmɛnθɪl haɪˌdrɒk.səˈpɜːr.ɒksaɪd/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 3735-11-7 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1578738 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:142215 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL614273 |
| ChemSpider | 21169860 |
| DrugBank | DB11243 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 100.081.088 |
| EC Number | EC 208-759-3 |
| Gmelin Reference | 102028 |
| KEGG | C07161 |
| MeSH | D016695 |
| PubChem CID | 14199511 |
| RTECS number | OP8575000 |
| UNII | 6LR1V5EC87 |
| UN number | 3115 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C10H20O2 |
| Molar mass | 154.24 g/mol |
| Appearance | Clear colorless liquid |
| Odor | Pungent odor |
| Density | 0.93 g/cm3 |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble |
| log P | 2.6 |
| Vapor pressure | 0.06 hPa (20 ℃) |
| Acidity (pKa) | 11.6 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -6.3E-6 cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.4630 |
| Viscosity | 15 mPa.s (25°C) |
| Dipole moment | 3.1 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 314.07 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -6785.7 kJ/mol |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | D18AX52 |
| Hazards | |
| GHS labelling | GHS02, GHS05, GHS07, GHS08 |
| Pictograms | GHS03,GHS05,GHS06,GHS08 |
| Signal word | Danger |
| Hazard statements | H242, H302, H314, H332, H335, H410 |
| Precautionary statements | P210, P220, P234, P280, P301+P310, P305+P351+P338, P308+P311, P337+P313, P370+P378, P410 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 3-4-2-W |
| Flash point | -20 °C |
| Autoignition temperature | 280°C |
| Explosive limits | Explosive limits: 3.6%–6.9% |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 oral, rat: 495 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): Oral Rat 495 mg/kg |
| NIOSH | DG2455000 |
| PEL (Permissible) | PEL: Not Established |
| REL (Recommended) | Danger |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Unknown |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Menthol Isopulegol Menthyl acetate P-Menthane Menthyl chloride |
