© 2026 Sinochem Nanjing Corporation,
All Right Reserved
The roots of O-Ethyl-O-[(2-Isopropoxycarbonyl)Phenyl]-N-Isopropylthiophosphoramide run back several decades, intertwined with the rise of organophosphorus chemistry. Older generations of chemists remember the intense period after World War II, when scientists focused on developing not just agricultural solutions, but also ways to manage pests and plant diseases with precision. The molecule belongs to a family that directly benefited from the rapid expansion of synthetic chemistry and the growing need for selective modes of action in crop protection. As restrictions tightened around older, more persistent chemicals, researchers invested in molecules with more targeted approaches and improved profiles. National agencies and international networks shared new data, pushing the field beyond crude organophosphates toward nuanced, multi-functional compounds. This compound’s arrival shows the steady hand of iterative progress—careful changes in structure, repeated testing, and gradual adoption driven both by regulation and market demand.
O-Ethyl-O-[(2-Isopropoxycarbonyl)Phenyl]-N-Isopropylthiophosphoramide stands out among similar compounds due to its specialized structure—a key reason chemists turn to it in research and industrial settings. This powerhouse doesn’t just ride on the strength of its backbone, but on carefully engineered functional groups that set its activity in motion. Crop scientists in particular value its specific interactions with plant enzymes, while experts in synthesis appreciate its stability in storage and under field conditions. For manufacturers, the real draw comes from its adaptability and consistent performance, giving a solid foundation for delivery systems in various technical applications. From direct use as a starting material to intermediate status in more elaborate processes, its flexibility answers more than one need without short-cutting performance.
Anyone who’s handled O-Ethyl-O-[(2-Isopropoxycarbonyl)Phenyl]-N-Isopropylthiophosphoramide in the lab will notice its distinct odor and crystalline appearance. Usually presenting as a white or off-white solid, it shows a melting point that reflects the presence of ester and thiophosphoramide groups—etched into its structure during synthesis. In routine work, solubility trends in organic solvents stay consistent, hinting at its robust yet manageable nature when it comes to formulation. Thermal stability checks often confirm its resilience under moderate heat, an important trait during downstream processing. Analytical methods such as NMR and IR spectra give a clear fingerprint, showing signals for the phosphoramide core and the unique isopropoxycarbonyl substituent. For chemists, the ease with which it dissolves in solvents like dichloromethane and ethyl acetate means simplified workups and more control during purification.
Suppliers must label this compound to the strictest global standards, reflecting its nuanced risk profile. Specifications detailed on materials safety data sheets go beyond just percentage purity; they stretch into water content, residual solvents, and the presence of byproducts. Labs I’ve worked in always double-check for trace impurities using GC-MS and HPLC methods, since even small amounts could skew the results in sensitive applications. Proper storage—usually in tightly sealed, amber glass bottles under inert gas—keeps the compound free from moisture and photodegradation. Shipment labels include all the important pictograms from the Global Harmonized System (GHS), making sure users handle it with care. The batch number, manufacture date, and expiration date also ride along, since change in physical state or degradation would impact its effectiveness and safety.
The journey from basic precursors to finished O-Ethyl-O-[(2-Isopropoxycarbonyl)Phenyl]-N-Isopropylthiophosphoramide takes place in stages, each demanding close attention. Synthesis starts with a phenyl precursor functionalized with an isopropoxycarbonyl group. Combining this with O-ethyl and N-isopropyl substituents involves phosphorus trichloride, alcohol exchange, and amination under controlled conditions. What stands out is the careful temperature management during alkylation—one misstep and byproducts build up, dropping overall yield and complicating purification. Some routes adopt micro-scale optimizations like phase-transfer catalysis to keep the process efficient and waste low. As reaction scales grow, so do questions about green chemistry, prompting today’s teams to look for solvent minimization, energy-efficient steps, and easy recovery of excess reagents. Controls on water content and pressure require hands-on management, not just robotic monitoring.
This compound greets both nucleophiles and electrophiles with predictable—yet tunable—reactivity. Researchers leverage its phosphorus center, offering chances for hydrolysis, oxidation, or further substitution at the O-ethyl site. Heating with mild aqueous base slowly cleaves the ester, while strong oxidants target the thiophosphoramide bond. For those aiming to build new analogs or tailor properties, coupling with other aromatic units or introduction of heterocyclic rings opens up new structural space. Patent literature often describes tweaks to the alkoxy groups, changing the rate of environmental breakdown or altering uptake in target tissues. In universities and corporate labs alike, the challenges usually revolve around controlling selectivity, as side reactions at the phenyl ring can irreversibly alter its function. For those growing up in hands-on chemistry, these obstacles sharpen both technique and creative thinking.
Over the years, O-Ethyl-O-[(2-Isopropoxycarbonyl)Phenyl]-N-Isopropylthiophosphoramide picked up a collection of names across languages and research groups. Some vendors keep to systematic nomenclature, others shorten to code names or proprietary tags—often stringing together fragments like “EICPI-TPA”. Regulatory submissions sometimes list two or three synonyms side-by-side, highlighting how even paperwork must adjust for uncertainty in chemical naming. Printed catalogs and online databases reflect all spelling variations, spelling out the challenge for buyers who don’t want shipment delays or substitution errors. For a seasoned chemist, the only way to avoid mistakes is to double back through CAS numbers and structural diagrams, skipping over local trade names that may carry hidden differences.
Handling this compound means a heightened sense of vigilance. Labs enforce gloves, goggles, and fume hoods; not taking chances with skin or eye contact. The phosphorus and thiophosphoramide units present some risk of toxicity if mishandled, with organophosphorus risks reminding everyone of a legacy of potent acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. Material Safety Data Sheets spell out emergency steps—what to do for inhalation, ingestion, or surface contamination. Disposing of waste goes hand in hand with local regulations, sending remnants to specialist incinerators or chemical disposal firms. For larger users, periodic health screenings and environmental monitoring build a record of care, proving compliance to auditors and protecting those who work with the material every day. I remember old-timers telling stories about how safety culture evolved, learning from incidents to bake caution into every step of the workflow.
Industrial users and researchers keep turning to O-Ethyl-O-[(2-Isopropoxycarbonyl)Phenyl]-N-Isopropylthiophosphoramide for its strong profile in specialized crop protection, pest control, and even as a building block for more advanced functional materials. The characteristic activity against certain enzymatic targets lends it value in situations where broad-spectrum approaches fail. Professionals in agriculture stress its careful deployment, weighing benefits against risks of off-target effects. Synthetic chemists sometimes use it as a launching point for more intricate molecules—especially where phosphorus chemistry meets biological applications. Some specialty manufacturing sectors lean on it to provide intermediate products in polymer synthesis, thanks to its reliable bond formation and stability. Each time a company adapts the compound for a fresh purpose, it signals a new wave of laboratory work focused on field trials or fine-tuning.
Research teams span continents, collaborating to unlock the hidden potential inside this molecule. In university settings, grants direct students to fine-tune reaction pathways, seeking to boost yields while cutting waste. Analytical chemists chase after minor degradation products, looking for anything that could backfire when used outside controlled settings. R&D departments in private firms set up parallel projects: one group studies formulation improvements, another team models how modified structures behave in living systems. Series of patent filings reflect competitive energy, as each variant seeks a step forward in effectiveness or safety. This climate of constant revision, peer review, and challenge means only the most robust data survives. In my own experience, open sharing during conferences and review panels often nudges slow-moving ideas into productive territory, leading to cross-pollination nobody predicted when work began.
Toxicologists devote years to building up a detailed map of how this compound interacts with living organisms. Cell culture studies dig deep into enzyme binding, metabolic breakdown, and potential for chronic effects, sometimes weeks or months before animal studies even begin. Researchers watch carefully for hints of mutagenicity, neurotoxicity, and impact on non-target species—answering questions regulators and consumers raise. Risk assessment never feels theoretical when you see its traces in river sediments, or when agricultural workers petition for clearer health guidance. Toxicity data often drive reformulation and better application protocols, forcing companies to balance commercial pressure with real human costs. Personal stories from rural health programs show why this work should not cut corners, as the difference between safe use and tragedy can be measured in micrograms.
The road ahead for O-Ethyl-O-[(2-Isopropoxycarbonyl)Phenyl]-N-Isopropylthiophosphoramide depends on everything from regulatory changes to advances in synthetic methods. As countries tighten rules on chemical run-off and environmental persistence, researchers target new derivatives with faster breakdown and less bioaccumulation. Digital modeling steps in to speed up screening, slashing the time needed to predict good candidates before they ever reach the synthesis stage. For professionals working to support food security, the questions shift: can variants of this compound help overcome resistant weeds or insects, or work in more challenging climates? In the face of climate change, the world needs molecules that blend lower environmental impact with enough potency to safeguard crops. The push and pull between safety and performance never quits, and I see younger scientists picking up the baton—combining lessons from organophosphorus chemistry with a focus on stewardship and accountability. As technology sharpens further, the legacy of careful, evidence-driven development continues, guided by voices from both the lab and the field.
O-Ethyl-O-[(2-Isopropoxycarbonyl)Phenyl]-N-Isopropylthiophosphoramide—quite the mouthful. Most folks won’t bump into this name at the grocery store, but it pops up plenty in agriculture and environmental circles. Its common name, Fonofos, tags it as a chemical tool meant for the dirt. Growers look to it as an organophosphate insecticide. The primary point? Knock out soil-dwelling pests like rootworms that love to destroy corn crops. I remember rolling through fields out in the Midwest, where farmers talked about keeping insects under control not just for yield, but to avoid ruin. Say the word “rootworm,” and you’ll watch worry lines flash over a grower’s face.
Farmers have chased ways to feed more people with less land, roofing out weeds and bugs with the help of industrial science. Fonofos turned heads for how well it handled soil pests hiding beneath the surface, thriving where dusts and sprays wouldn’t stay. Turning to a product like this often makes a difference in protecting an investment. Food security hangs on every ear of corn, every bushel not lost to bugs.
There’s always a price. Experience on the plains taught me farmers weigh risk against reward daily. Organophosphates like Fonofos can threaten more than just target insects—the chemical holds toxicity for birds, aquatic life, and humans if handled or spread carelessly. Stories have floated around the farming community about exposure causing headaches, dizziness, or worse; these tales aren’t just scare tactics, they’re warnings born from lived experience.
A chilling fact: compounds like Fonofos work by attacking the nervous system, and they don’t always distinguish between a pest and something else moving in the grass. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency moved to ban many uses because the danger outpaced the benefit for human and environmental health. This decision rippled through rural communities, shaking up pest control routines built over generations.
Farmers don’t just want bigger harvests; they care about safety for themselves, their families, and folks down the road from their fields. The conversation now turns more to integrated pest management, swapping heavy chemical use for rotations, natural predators, and narrow targeting where a spray or granule really does the most good. There’s progress in turning to new chemistries that break down faster and stay out of water sources. Neighbors, researchers, and policymakers can’t sit on separate sides of the table; the best answers come from hearing hard truths and working through them, field by field.
No single chemical saves a season. Tools like Fonofos solved real problems, but they left a legacy we all have to acknowledge. My own work alongside people close to the land taught me that science brings real solutions, but it rarely works best on its own. Lasting protection for crops calls for smarter mixtures of tradition and technology. Banning substances because of real harm makes sense; listening to farmers about what works helps keep the work honest. Moving past old habits takes effort and patience.
Long-term, the goal stretches beyond one field, one product, or one harvest. It reaches for the health of the soil, the safety of water, and the strength of the community facing decisions that impact everyone’s supper table.
Anyone who’s spent time in a laboratory or warehouse understands the challenge of storing chemicals safely. Danger doesn’t just come from obvious mishandling; it also sneaks in through overlooked details—leaky caps, sunny windows, or drifted labels long past legible.
One summer in graduate school, our lab cleared out an old storage cabinet. Several bottles showed faded hazard symbols. Some powders hardened into bricks. That day taught me more about vigilance with chemicals than any textbook.
Container material counts for more than most assume. Certain compounds chew through plastics in weeks. Glass holds up, but not everything deserves to nest in glass—hydrofluoric acid, for example, etches right through.
Strong oxidizers belong far from organic materials. Keep acids away from bases. Never stash flammable solvents next to oxidizers, even when space runs tight. Recently, a routine inspection at a colleague’s biotech startup found alcohols stacked near bleach. That combo can end a business if a spill happens.
Labels must stick and stay clear. I’ve seen labels smudged by spills, then reused on another bottle to save minutes. Those shortcuts turn routine tasks risky. Each bottle deserves its own identity, batch number, and date received. Best practices include using chemical-resistant labels and double-checking inventory monthly.
Temperature and humidity affect chemical stability as much as container type. Some reagents break down fast above room temperature. Others draw in moisture, clump together, or form hazardous byproducts. Dry desiccators or specialized refrigerators extend shelf life for sensitive compounds.
Good airflow matters for more than comfort. Fume hoods reduce inhalation risks during handling, but storage spaces need consideration, too—especially for volatile or odorous materials. Seal containers tightly and keep them upright. Small steps like regular checks for cracked lids or stuck threads prevent bigger disasters.
Gloves and goggles sound obvious, but countless accidents happen through simple touch or careless pouring. I learned respect for gloves by watching a postdoc clean up phenol barehanded, discovering hours later how deep contact burns can go. Never underestimate splash risks—one spill can travel farther than expected.
Setups should favor stability. No chemicals near edges, and shelving must support full loads. Even earthquake straps become important, as some have learned the hard way in regions prone to tremors. Small investment in safety pays off: fire extinguishers, spill kits, and eyewash stations need to stay stocked and reachable.
Digital inventories with automatic expiration reminders beat handwritten logs. Training refreshers work wonders, especially for newer team members who grew up with digital labs and might not recognize dated hazards. Incorporating regular walkthroughs and peer safety audits keeps everyone honest.
For companies managing larger stores, isolation cabinets for toxics and dust-control systems for powders create healthier spaces. Secure access keeps the curious or untrained away—and controlled disposal cuts risk of dangerous leftovers.
Treat storage as an active process, not a one-off task. Respect for these basics prevents injuries, preserves evidence for regulatory inspections, and—most importantly—protects people working with these compounds every day.
Everyday situations introduce plenty of risks—slippery floors in kitchens, hot surfaces in the garage, caustic cleaning supplies under the sink. Even in workplaces, dangers range from sharp tools to exposed wiring. Many just shrug off these risks, but the toll adds up. In the U.S., over 10 million emergency room visits every year trace back to falls, burns, cuts, or accidental chemical exposure. I remember a neighbor ending up with a trip to the ER after pouring drain cleaner without gloves—it’s not a story anyone wants to repeat.
Slips and falls sound minor until you or someone close takes a bad spill. Broken bones, head injuries, or serious bruising often follow. Burns from boiling pots, open flames, or electrical mishaps can lead to infections and scars. Corrosive chemicals, even those stamped “household safe,” can eat through skin or cause blindness if splashed in eyes. Power tools spin out more than just sawdust—missing guards and quick hands leave behind lost fingers and regret. I’ve seen coworkers work too fast with box cutters and need stitches within minutes.
Panic never solves anything, but speed saves futures. For a severe cut, pressure with a clean cloth stops bleeding before medics arrive. If someone burns their hand, cool running water draws out heat so blisters don’t run deep. Splashed eyes? A rinse with gentle, steady water for 15 minutes can mean the difference between a scare and lifelong vision issues. A person collapsed from electrical shock should only be touched after power gets shut off—it’s the small gap between two victims and one. Every second counts, and knowing what to do can turn disaster into just a rough day.
Clean up spills fast, stash sharp objects securely, and unplug appliances before fixing them. Mark chemical containers clearly, so no one pours something dangerous where it shouldn’t go. Wearing gloves and old clothes isn’t just for experts—anyone using bleach or strong cleaners gains extra safety with little effort. I set my phone timer for regular breaks when using power tools, since fatigue blurs judgment and causes accidents.
Even a basic first aid class prepares you for real emergencies. Learning how to wrap wounds, cool burns, or perform CPR brings steady hands to chaos. Many businesses and public spaces now offer free short courses—half a day can mean greater protection for everyone around. I joined a community session two years back, and those techniques stuck with me better than any instruction manual.
A good kit includes bandages, sterile gauze, adhesive tape, non-latex gloves, and a bottle of sterile saline. Toss in a burn gel, scissors, tweezers, and a face shield for rescue breathing. Store it where anyone can reach it—under the kitchen sink, in a tool drawer, or at the front desk. Post emergency contacts on the fridge, so people don’t waste time looking for help when it really counts.
Being alert doesn’t end after checking your own habits. Small acts—mopping up messes, taping down loose cords, checking that fire extinguishers work—protect not just yourself, but kids, coworkers, and neighbors too. Every life benefits from a shared sense of responsibility, stronger than any list of safety rules.
Most people glance at a chemical’s molecular formula and see a jumble of letters and numbers. Scientists, pharmacists, even folks mixing up home cleaners, know the score. It’s not just code. The formula tells you how many atoms stick together to build a single molecule. Look at water, for example: H2O. Two hydrogen, one oxygen, tightly bonded. Change that order or the numbers, and you’re not holding water anymore.
Years ago, I tried to repair a broken thermostat on my own. I read the old wires wrong and ended up short-circuiting half the system. Something similar happens in chemistry. Misreading the formula won’t just waste your time; it could mean safety risks or a recipe that fails. Chemistry, even in a classroom, hinges on getting those details right. Not just for the exam—think medication, think paint, think cleaning supplies. The right formula keeps things safe, reliable, and predictable. The structure, how those atoms connect, drives the real difference. Ethanol and dimethyl ether are both C2H6O, but their structures set them worlds apart: one fuels cars, the other doesn’t even mix with water the same way.
A single switch in structure can rewrite the rulebook. In medicine, sometimes a drug works; sometimes it causes harm, all because a bond moved or an atom flipped. Take thalidomide—one mirror image in its structure treated morning sickness, the other tragically caused birth defects. Ignoring structure slams the door on understanding how or why a substance acts the way it does.
You can sniff out a structure’s influence across industries. In food science, changing a molecule’s shape can mean the jump from sweetener to calorie bomb. In agriculture, tweaking a pesticide’s structure could make it safer for bees—or incredibly toxic. My own work in the homebrew world taught me that trivial changes, like swapping out table sugar for maltose, shift the taste and even the safety of what you pour.
These days, no one has to work only with balls and sticks to puzzle out a formula. Spectroscopy, X-ray crystallography, and a range of easy-to-access databases make it straightforward to check what a chemical’s made of and how it stacks up. Students and professionals grab details from reliable sources, like PubChem or the National Institutes of Health databases, to double-check structures before starting experiments or scaling up a process.
A company that lists the full molecular formula and provides a diagram deserves attention, not just because it’s helpful, but because it signals transparency. Safety data sheets and product labels give communities the power to know what’s in their environment, making it easier to spot hazards before they start. Trust builds from clear scientific information, not marketing speak.
Chemistry shapes modern society in ways that sneak into daily life. Whether mixing a cleaner under the kitchen sink or crafting a new medication in a lab, understanding the molecular formula and structure means fewer mistakes, fewer risks, and smarter choices. The devil really is in the details, and there’s nothing more detailed in chemistry than getting the formula and structure straight from the source.
Back in college, our organic chemistry lab kept a locked cabinet for anything with long, tongue-twisting names. O-Ethyl-O-[(2-Isopropoxycarbonyl)Phenyl]-N-Isopropylthiophosphoramide landed straight on that no-touch list. Handling or disposing of toxic organophosphates is never a casual affair—they’re used as pesticides, but also have links to nerve agents. So if a bottle ever gets uncovered on a forgotten shelf or in an old shed, don’t shrug it off. A spill, a careless rinse, or simple exposure might carry real risks, not only for the person handling it but also for water, soil, and people down the line.
You put on two sets of gloves, safety goggles, and a thick lab coat because organophosphates absorb through skin and vaporize dangerously. The toxic nature sticks around. Throwing a compound like this in the trash or down the drain is, frankly, reckless. The EPA and OSHA treat such chemicals as hazardous waste—rightly so. There’s no “DIY disposal” for complex organophosphates if you value your health and the environment.
Federal and state regulations exist for a reason. Facilities follow strict rules under guidelines like the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). I’ve toured hazardous waste plants—their security is tighter than most banks, because slip-ups have consequences measured in lives and acres. Disposal companies move waste like O-Ethyl-O-[(2-Isopropoxycarbonyl)Phenyl]-N-Isopropylthiophosphoramide in double-sealed drums, tracked by paperwork from the moment it leaves your hands until it reaches incinerators or chemical treatment plants strong enough to render it harmless. That chain of custody builds trust: No surprise poison leaking into the water table years later.
There’s nothing distant or theoretical about an organophosphate spill in a small town—it poisons wells, sickens animals, and ruins livelihoods. Agricultural runoff, poor disposal, or improper burning keep pushing these molecules into water and food. My own home state paid a hard price for a dump site cleaned up decades late; even today, the cancer numbers run higher than average within a few miles. Urban legends about “hot spots” carry more truth than most people know.
Call the local hazardous waste hotline. Most cities and counties have lists of certified contractors ready to handle unusual chemicals. My old lab manager drilled into us: Document everything. Write down the substance, quantity, and any spills or accidents, even the ones you clean up right away. Bring in professionals who wear proper gear and have access to government-approved incinerators or chemical neutralization plants. Skip conference room debates about “possible safe disposal”; just send it with the pros.
Community outreach is another vital step. Clear, honest public information about chemicals on site builds trust and encourages safe disposal. Start training staff early, not after someone gets a rash. Support legislation that keeps funding for national emergency response teams. Every time I hear about a community avoiding disaster because someone spoke up about an old barrel, I think one less tragedy made the news.
Bottom line: give chemicals like O-Ethyl-O-[(2-Isopropoxycarbonyl)Phenyl]-N-Isopropylthiophosphoramide the respect they earn by being so hazardous. Push for clear rules and tough enforcement. Connect science labs, workplaces, and municipalities with certified disposal experts. No shortcut is worth the health of your neighbors or the safety of groundwater. If your shelves hold a bottle with this name, treat it as a wake-up call, not a bureaucratic nuisance.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | O-ethyl-O-[2-(propan-2-yloxycarbonyl)phenyl]-N-propanylphosphorothioamidic acid |
| Other names |
Etofenprox Impurity A O-Ethyl O-(2-(propan-2-yloxycarbonyl)phenyl)-N-isopropylphosphoramidothioate |
| Pronunciation | /oʊ-ˈiːθɪl-oʊ-ˌtuː-aɪsəˈprəʊksikɑːrˈboʊnɪl-ˈfiːnəl-en-aɪ-aɪsəˈprəʊpɪl-θaɪoʊ-fɒsˈfɔːrə-maɪd/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 50782-69-9 |
| 3D model (JSmol) | `N[C@@H](C(C)C)P(=S)(OC(C)C)OC1=CC=CC=C1C(=O)OC(C)C` |
| Beilstein Reference | 526978 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:34931 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL191441 |
| ChemSpider | 21197933 |
| DrugBank | DB02407 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03b7f017-22ce-41f3-98b7-28b3f8581a95 |
| EC Number | EC 251-862-2 |
| Gmelin Reference | Gmelin 155567 |
| KEGG | C18526 |
| MeSH | Dichlorvos |
| PubChem CID | 6604022 |
| RTECS number | SY8575000 |
| UNII | 4I2U1T9Q83 |
| UN number | UN 3018 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID0039069 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C16H26N1O4PS |
| Molar mass | 429.53 g/mol |
| Appearance | White solid |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.18 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble |
| log P | 2.89 |
| Vapor pressure | 0.0000133 mmHg at 25°C |
| Acidity (pKa) | 13.06 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 2.14 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -74.85×10⁻⁶ cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.545 |
| Dipole moment | 2.24 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 576.8 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -1289.8 kJ/mol |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | S01GA02 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | Harmful if swallowed. Harmful if inhaled. Causes skin irritation. Causes serious eye irritation. Suspected of causing cancer. Toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, GHS08 |
| Pictograms | GHS06,GHS08 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H302, H315, H318, H319, H335, H410 |
| Precautionary statements | P261, P273, P280, P305+P351+P338, P309+P311 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-2-1-3 |
| Flash point | Flash point: 100°C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (rat, oral): 1,100 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): 2 mg/kg |
| NIOSH | PC9450000 |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | Not established |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Phosmet Parathion Phosalone Isoxathion Malathion Chlorpyrifos Diazinon Ethion |
