© 2026 Sinochem Nanjing Corporation,
All Right Reserved
The story behind the mixture of Tert-Butyl Peroxy-2-Ethylhexanoate and 2,2-Di-(Tert-Butylperoxy)Butane traces back to the early days of organic peroxide chemistry. As industry needed more reliable polymerization initiators, early labs experimented with simple organic peroxides, quickly running into problems related to unpredictable decomposition and stability issues. Chemical engineers, pressed by the demand for larger-scale plastics production, soon found that mixing peroxides with differing decomposition rates could give much better process control, both in terms of timing and safety. By refining formulations and improving purification methods, the field shifted from rudimentary mixtures to well-characterized substances like this one, suited to newer, more demanding polymerization techniques. My own first encounter with these mixtures came during a plant tour, where a senior technician explained how decades of practical safety know-how, often gained through hard experience, led to the precise blends used today.
This mixture consists of Tert-Butyl Peroxy-2-Ethylhexanoate at no more than 31%, 2,2-Di-(Tert-Butylperoxy)Butane topping out at 36%, with a Type B Diluent making up at least 33% of the blend. These proportions live at the intersection of commercial viability and safety. Each component lends unique thermal and solubility behavior, allowing the mixture to perform consistently in production lines that run for weeks. In practice, production teams prize this blend for its balance: enough active peroxide for effective polymerization, with enough diluent to tame the potential for runaway reactions that haunted earlier generations of peroxide users. Reliable suppliers make sure these numbers aren’t just theoretical: application labs routinely test each lot before approving it for use, proving once again how precise control in the chemical world underpins industries ranging from plastics to adhesives.
Tert-Butyl Peroxy-2-Ethylhexanoate and 2,2-Di-(Tert-Butylperoxy)Butane share some features users look for: clear liquids at ambient conditions, notable for a trademark faintly sweet odor. Handling this mixture involves working with a low viscosity, pale fluid that does well in storage when protected from high heat and shock. The boiling point remains high enough for moderate process needs but low enough that any heating system requires precise temperature control to prevent decomposition. Solubility leans toward organic solvents, and users avoid mixing with acids or bases unless a specific reaction is intended. In my own experience with these chemicals, warehouse staff always stressed the importance of standardizing temperature controls and removing ignition sources. Accidental warming, even on a sunny loading dock, moves from curiosity to major concern when it comes to peroxides like these.
Technical documentation comes packed with the essentials: concentration ranges, temperature limits, recommended storage practices, and detailed hazard labeling matching current GHS standards. Every drum carried pictograms for flammability, self-reactivity, and health hazard warnings, plus clear instructions in multiple languages. Labels show batch number, expiry date, and instructions for incident response—if you’ve ever managed a chemical inventory, you know how crucial that is if something heads sideways during transport. Paperwork includes recommended shelf lives and reminder notes about inspecting storage areas for leaks or bulging containers. On any shift, you’ll find teams double-checking container seals and signing off on documented inspections—a sign that these products, for all their utility, still demand vigilant stewardship.
Manufacturers produce Tert-Butyl Peroxy-2-Ethylhexanoate through controlled reaction of tert-butyl hydroperoxide and 2-ethylhexanoic acid, often with an acid catalyst and chilled reaction setup, carefully avoiding excess moisture. The resulting product requires several rounds of purification, ensuring the right concentration and removing acidic residues. 2,2-Di-(Tert-Butylperoxy)Butane synthesis follows a different pathway involving reaction of tert-butyl hydroperoxide with butane derivatives, then isolated using distillation. Combining the purified peroxides with a Type B Diluent, typically a high-boiling, non-reactive solvent, technicians ensure correct blending by performing small-batch tests before scaling up. From personal experience watching batch blending, I can attest to how much value shops place on real-time monitoring: ignored alarms or casual measurement almost always lead to rejected lots, since both yield and safety fall off quickly even with minor deviations.
In practical use, this mixture acts as a source of free radicals, sparking polymerization in vinyl acetate, styrene, and various acrylates. Controlled temperature ramps break the O–O bonds selectively, producing radicals at rates that match production needs. Lab modifications sometimes involve tweaking diluent levels, chasing improved flow at elevated temperatures or easing incorporation into tricky blends. Process engineers use chemical insights to adjust end-use performance: less thermally stable peroxides give faster cures but shorter shelf lives, so picking the right ratio drives production speed or storage stability depending on factory schedules. In meetings with compounding teams, I’ve heard how even subtle tweaks—down to half a percent in mix ratio—can determine whether a line delivers premium product or requires days of rework.
You’ll spot this mixture under several names, depending on region and supplier: Tert-Butylperoxyheptanoate Mix, DTBPB-initiator blend, and even trade names designed for marketing appeal. Regulatory paperwork always includes Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) numbers for both main peroxides, further backing up traceability during audits. In chemical plants, shorthand abounds—often just “peroxide blend B.” Here’s a tip: always cross-check the label and paperwork when switching suppliers, as regional differences in naming or formulation can lead to surprise reactivity or specification drift. Anyone who’s ever reordered a “familiar” initiator and watched a batch fail knows the value of strict documentation.
Tert-Butyl Peroxy-2-Ethylhexanoate and its blended relatives demand strong risk management. Modern operations call for explosion-proof electrical systems, rigorous static control, and hands-on chemical training down to line workers. Fire suppression systems must use media effective against chemical fires—ordinary water doesn’t cut it. Personal protective equipment isn’t optional; full face shields, thick gloves, and chemical aprons are standard. Safety data sheets spell out what to do if contact or inhalation happens, and every site doing regular work with these peroxides practices spill drills. Local regulators often mandate frequent audits: any lapse, such as letting dust or other fuels accumulate, turns a tool into a hazard. As accidents elsewhere have shown, strict adherence to procedures forms the backbone of a safe operation—one missed check or worn goggle strap can spell disaster. Experience teaches that the people closest to these chemicals—mixing, sampling, loading—are the company’s real line of defense.
Industries working with plastics, elastomers, and composite materials keep this peroxide blend on the regular order sheet. Producers of PVC, acrylic resins, and unsaturated polyesters rely on these blends for controlled polymerization, getting the curing speed and molecular weight right to match fine-tuned product specifications. Some adhesives makers mix small amounts in so their products set quickly and cleanly. Parts for aerospace or automotive suppliers, which must meet tough durability and longevity standards, depend on peroxides to produce the tough plastics launching vehicles down roads or up into orbit. Even shoe manufacturers see the benefit, using controlled polymerization to achieve the perfect blend of flexibility and resilience. My own introduction to these applications came from a tour at a mid-sized pipe extruder’s plant, where a shift leader showed me test samples from batches prepared with and without this blend. The differences in surface quality and mechanical performance drove home just how central these blends have become.
R&D labs working with these mixtures experiment with alternate diluents and stabilizers, always aiming for longer shelf lives, lower costs, and cleaner decomposition products. Green chemistry principles increasingly push manufacturers toward diluents and additives that cause fewer environmental problems during use and disposal. Scientists look to increase operational windows—both higher and lower temperature thresholds—so their products fit more production lines with less risk of accidental decomposition. Analytical teams run aging studies, using real-time infrared tracking to measure how storage or contaminated environments nudge decomposition rates. I’ve sat in meetings where R&D managers describe trials using advanced microreactors, reducing batch sizes and scaling up only if decomposition checks out. This slow, cautious grind supports the growth of new application areas like 3D printing resins or specialty adhesives. Many on the factory floor hope that next-generation blends will bring even greater process flexibility with less need for temperature or contamination control.
Health researchers devote much attention to the effects of accidental exposure. Animal studies show eye and skin irritation at moderate exposures, with higher levels linked to systemic toxicity if absorbed or inhaled. Chronic exposure via low-level air contamination leads to headaches and respiratory complaints, so production areas must stay well-ventilated. Some peroxides, Tert-Butyl Peroxy-2-Ethylhexanoate among them, leave behind breakdown products that irritate the skin or lungs—and even cause sensitization in a subset of workers. Labs testing metabolites, both in animals and humans, help set strict occupational exposure limits, backed by periodic blood or urine testing in occupational health clinics. Close inspection of incident reports in the trade press repeatedly shows that lax use of PPE or poor fume extraction ranks as one of the most common root causes in workplace illness. Word spreads on shop floors: if you start feeling a scratchy throat or watery eyes, it’s time to double-check the vent hoods and filtration before continuing.
Sustainability pushes chemical companies to look beyond today’s mixtures—lower environmental load, better recyclability, and less reliance on fossil-based ingredients. Universities and startups tackle novel synthesis pathways to create peroxide initiators from renewable feedstocks, designing diluents with better biodegradability and fewer persistent residues. Regulatory changes in regions like Europe and East Asia force the industry to continually re-evaluate formulations and disposal routes. Some R&D labs investigate peroxides with inherently safer decompositions, reduced flammability, or dual-use functionality for new manufacturing processes, such as bio-based polymer blends or low-energy curing technologies. Industry partnerships with academic labs grow, with shared databases of decomposition energies and environmental fate underpinning open innovation efforts. My conversations with plant managers suggest high hopes for blends offering longer shelf lives without sacrificing performance, as well as easier adaptation to stricter regional rules. The next generation of blends, if they succeed, could help balance rising production needs with growing pressure for safety and sustainability.
Anyone who works around polymers knows that organic peroxides help drive many processes. Mixtures of tert-butyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate and 2,2-di-(tert-butylperoxy)butane show up in plastic plants where efficient production matters. These compounds kickstart reactions called polymerizations. This simply means turning small molecules, or monomers, into tough, usable materials like polyethylene or polypropylene. Their strength lies in releasing exactly the right radicals at the right temperature, letting chemical chains grow just as a factory needs. From grocery bags to auto bumpers, so many things used every day spring from lines powered by blends like these.
I once watched an engineer tweak a rubber formula to fix sagging engine mounts. He focused on the curing process—crosslinking, to be exact—using peroxides. Tert-butyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate, often paired with its chemical cousin, replaces sulfur in many modern factories for peroxide-curing synthetics. These chemicals tie together the long pieces in rubber, giving bounce and heat resistance. Think about tires that take bends at 70 miles an hour or shoe soles that don’t crumble on hot pavement. The right crosslinks mean safer drives and longer-lasting gear.
Construction crews rely on peroxides in fiberglass-reinforced plastics and other composites. Bridges, wind turbine blades, and sports equipment turn out lighter and stronger thanks to radical initiators like these. Blends trigger fast hardening, so work crews meet tight deadlines. In my work with small manufacturers, mixing in both peroxides often allowed for flexible cure rates without expensive ovens or long wait times. Shorter production cycles support growing industries, especially in places where every saved hour cuts costs.
These peroxides pack a punch, but mishandling in hot environments can lead to big trouble. Many companies store and transport them in cooled or insulated containers. I’ve seen operators track room temperature with diligence, and for good reason—peroxide decomposition can mean fires or worse. Safety guidelines set by regulators like OSHA and the European Chemicals Agency give clear requirements. Employees get regular training on spills, emergency shutoffs, and equipment checks. Simple routines, like wearing proper gloves and goggles, matter just as much as plant policies.
Every chemical brings a footprint. Efforts to reduce emissions push engineers to rethink how they use peroxides. Blends offering high efficiency mean less waste in the reaction phase. Some research teams now focus on recycling catalysts or capturing leftover residues before they head to wastewater plants. In some regions, tighter rules force companies to look for greener alternatives or minimize exposure to workers and waterways. Following best practices and updating technology bring better outcomes for both workers and the environment.
Emerging tech will shape how industries use these mixtures. Digital monitoring tracks temperature and pressure minute by minute. Advanced controls keep reactions in check, cutting accidents and making operations smoother. New formulations could bring even more precise control, reducing off-gassing and handling risks. Stronger safety cultures and transparency with the public build trust that these potent chemicals stay managed, even as use grows in fast-moving economies.
Growing up around a family shop, I saw what happens when folks get careless with chemicals. Bleach poured straight into ammonia and a cloud of trouble fills the room. Health risks aren’t just for textbook warnings — eyes, skin, and breathing can take a real hit if you don’t approach chemical mixtures with respect.
Even a quick pour or a brisk stir can put harmful vapors and droplets into the air. Gloves that cover your wrists, safety goggles, and clothing that covers your arms and legs do more than check a box. They keep your hands, eyes, and skin from soaking up something nasty. Too many people skip a mask, especially at home, but just a quick whiff of something strong can burn your throat or cloud your head.
It’s tempting to mix on the kitchen counter or the garage workbench. Problem is, most homes trap vapors and fumes. Crack a window, kick on a fan, and don’t work in small closets or bathrooms. A chemical’s vapor doesn’t care if you think it’ll just “clear out” soon. Inhalation injuries send thousands to the ER every year — plenty of those are folks who thought opening a door would do the trick.
Labels on chemical containers aren’t just filler words. Manufacturers add those details because people have gotten badly hurt ignoring them. Some mixtures are unstable or can catch fire if you’re not careful. Even mixing something as common as vinegar and bleach can create toxic chloramine gas — I’ve seen it in schools and homes and heard people say they didn’t know.
Kids and pets move fast, and even teens get curious. My neighbor once stored acid-based cleaners under the sink in an old Gatorade bottle. That led to a panicked call to poison control. Chemicals belong up high or locked away, clearly marked. Never use food or drink containers for storage, no matter how short a time you plan to keep them.
Keep emergency numbers — not just poison control, but also local fire and emergency services — somewhere you won’t fumble for in panic. Water stations or clean sinks should be ready in case of a spill. If something gets in your eye or on your skin, don’t tough it out or wait and see. Rinse, remove contaminated clothing, and get help. Minutes matter.
Jobs that handle chemicals — from pool maintenance to pest control — teach new hires real-world safety before anyone starts pouring or measuring. Even if you aren’t working on a big industrial site, look up credible resources. OSHA and CDC offer free safety guidelines and practical fact sheets. I learned most from old-timers who had seen what goes wrong, but online resources help fill in the gaps.
If you’re ever unsure how a chemical mixture will react, stop and get answers before you act. Local waste disposal centers, pharmacists, or science teachers can point you toward safe handling tips. The urge to improvise often leads to accidents that didn’t have to happen. Planning for safety doesn’t slow you down — it helps you finish what you started without regret.
Walk into any grocery store, and you’ll spot clear advice printed in bold: “Store in a cool, dry place.” This phrase isn’t just filler on a label. It speaks to lessons learned through mishaps—clumping flour, chocolate that sweats, wilted greens gone bad days ahead of schedule. Every day, most folks experience the ripple effects of poor storage, often blaming the product when temperature shifts or a damp shelf play a bigger role.
Go beyond your kitchen, and the rules don’t change much. Years ago, I trusted a garage shelf for storing painkillers. Summer heat and winter freeze left half-dissolved pills, packaging stuck together. Not only did it waste money, it created a medical risk. The same story plays out with vitamins, dried fruit, and even things like batteries. Safe storage isn’t nitpicking—it’s the difference between a product that works and one that lands in the trash or causes harm.
Manufacturers spend years stabilizing formulas, understanding how everything from humidity to ultraviolet light breaks down an ingredient. Take aspirin: Let it sit in a room with too much moisture and it breaks down to acetic acid, producing that sharp vinegar scent we all recognize. Skincare creams exposed to heat separate, losing their smooth consistency. These aren’t freak accidents—they’re reactions triggered by easily avoidable mistakes in storage.
Many products come with instructions to “store below 25°C” because at higher temperatures, chemical bonds weaken or get rearranged. Water vapor from humidity seeps through cardboard or poorly sealed lids, turning powders to paste or encouraging mold. For food, it’s more than just taste. Dried grains stored in humid cupboards can grow toxic mold (like aflatoxin) linked to serious health problems. Even non-edible products like detergents can clump or develop odors in damp environments, losing effectiveness.
A room with stable, moderate temperature means less risk of condensation or sudden chemical changes. Keeping things away from sunlight stops plastic packaging from breaking down, keeps colors from fading, and delays chemical decomposition.
Clear, specific storage instructions show respect for customers and a commitment to product longevity. Regulatory bodies, from the FDA in the United States to the European Medicines Agency, enforce strict labeling on packaging for pharmaceuticals, supplements, and foods. Recommendations are not guesswork; they come from testing products in different conditions to see when they perform best and when they fail.
A dedicated shelf, a cool pantry, or a closed cupboard keeps medicine, food, and household basics performing as promised. Keeping things off the windowsill, away from the stove or radiator, cuts down on risk. With crowded apartments and busy lives, simple steps matter. Sealing containers tightly and using airtight jars for loose food stops moisture and insects. Taking the few seconds to read and trust those storage instructions pays back in safety and money saved over time.
Staying organized helps at any scale. Pharmacies use climate control systems, and warehouses rely on temperature trackers. At home, a basic thermometer in the pantry can guide placement. Simple habits matter—always tighten lids, wipe away spills, rotate stock, and check labels before use. Technology now offers apps and sensors that flag temperature spikes or humidity, but old-fashioned care and attention handle most household needs just as well.
It only takes one moment of distraction. Someone reaches for a bottle, knocks it over, and then you smell chemicals in the air or see liquid on the floor. Once, in a job at a small factory, I stood right beside a table as bright blue powder spilled over my shoes. It’s easy to freeze up or push blame, but those seconds afterward matter a lot more than people realize. In the chaos, people’s health, workplace trust, and regulatory standing all come into play. Nobody wants the legacy of a covered-up spill, so action and honesty become practical strengths.
Forget about the paperwork for a moment—getting people safe must come first. My own knee-jerk move was to tell everyone nearby to step away. Shutting off air conditioning or opening windows sometimes helps, though this depends entirely on what hit the ground. OSHA states that chemical exposure sends thousands to the hospital every year, not just factory workers. People react to chemicals in wildly different ways, based on skin absorption, allergy risk, or the presence of existing health conditions. In my experience, a minor exposure can make even healthy people feel dizzy or get headaches. That’s not a risk worth gambling on.
Cover-ups rarely work for long. Telling supervisors, co-workers, or—if the mess is serious—emergency responders, avoids legal trouble and protects everyone. At my old workplace, a quick call to the main office triggered an internal protocol that stopped the spill from spreading. Employees stayed away, trained techs came in, and we got updates without any guesswork. Too often, people feel embarrassed or fear job loss, so they quietly mop things up. Later on, hidden residues show up on shoes, desks, or lunch tables, putting far more people at risk. It always pays to log each incident and push for retraining if the same issue crops up again.
Once everyone steps back and the right folks take over, the actual cleanup starts. This means using the right gloves, goggles, and products for whatever spilled. Some accidents need just a mop and strong soap, but acids, strong bases, or solvents demand special kits and neutralizers. Many smaller offices or schools don’t keep the right supplies nearby, which shows a gap in real preparedness. After cleanup, keeping records helps for employee health checks and for making sure the same kind of accident doesn't repeat in the future. I’ve seen managers who think paperwork is pointless—until someone gets sick or an auditor visits.
Accidents serve as lessons, not just headaches. After the blue powder episode at work, the team redid training so nobody second-guessed what to do. Clear, repeated drills lowered stress and sped up safe reactions. This wasn’t about ticking boxes; it made a visible difference on the floor. Everyone took pride in working at a place that didn’t shrug off safety. Regular reviews of safety data sheets (SDS) and first-aid protocols matter more than flash-in-the-pan pizza parties or pep talks.
Every office, lab, factory, or school keeps substances that could hurt someone. Strong processes and open culture mean spills get reported and fixed fast. A strong approach doesn’t just follow the rules; it blocks injuries, fines, or loss of trust. In the everyday push to meet deadlines and costs, prioritizing safety makes for better work, healthier staff, and a company people want to stay with.
Whenever a new consumer product lands on store shelves, the first thing I look for is information about its ingredients. Years ago, I learned the hard way that products labeled as "safe" sometimes hide irritants and chemicals that trigger allergies. This product lists several chemicals with names that sound harmless, yet some of them carry recognized health risks. For instance, phthalates and certain synthetic fragrances used for scent can contribute to respiratory problems. Those with asthma or allergies might notice sneezing or a tight chest after using these products at home.
Beyond respiratory symptoms, some people develop skin reactions—redness, itchiness, or even rashes. Dermatologists warn that repeated exposure to preservatives like parabens or methylisothiazolinone can strip away the skin’s natural oils, making everyday contact uncomfortable. I once worked with a woman who experienced seasonal eczema that flared only when she tried out a new shampoo; after months of switching products, she discovered a common preservative was behind it.
Mounting evidence links exposure to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) with more serious issues. These VOCs evaporate at room temperature, filling indoor air without any obvious sign. Studies by the US Environmental Protection Agency have tracked VOC exposure in household products, noting that even low, daily exposure can interfere with hormone function and raise cancer risks over many years. It isn’t always about a single use—consistent, long-term exposure can matter much more.
In homes with kids or pets, the stakes climb even higher. Children’s developing immune systems mean they’re more sensitive to toxins, and animals absorb chemicals through paws and grooming habits. I worry about how children crawling on floors or mouthing toys might end up exposed in ways adults might not even realize. Families with pets also need to think about what settles on fur or food dishes.
My concern doesn’t stop at personal exposure. Products washed down the drain—like cleansers or shampoos—find their way into water systems. Even modern wastewater plants miss micro-pollutants. Aquatic species, especially those living near urban runoff points, start to show effects of these chemicals: some fish develop abnormal hormone levels or reproductive issues, according to research out of major aquatic biology labs in North America and Europe. These changes disrupt local ecosystems and, over time, can make their way back up the food chain.
In my community, folks have started organizing local water testing and green-clean campaigns after noticing unexplained algae blooms and fish deaths. Stories like these drive home that every bottle tipped over a sink might reach beyond our own households.
Better product labeling would save all of us a lot of trial and error. We shouldn’t have to dig through academic journals to get safety info. Regulators and manufacturers need to put clear, honest warnings upfront, especially on products with ingredients linked to chronic illness or acute reactions.
On the personal level, switching to fragrance-free and dye-free versions cuts down on unnecessary risks. Learning from friends with allergies, I’ve started to patch-test even everyday goods before broad use, just in case. For folks washing these products down the drain, supporting or joining local efforts for water-safe alternatives can nudge companies toward greener choices.
In the end, no one knows our habits or sensitivities better than we do. Staying curious, sharing experiences, and insisting on safety data from companies opens the door to healthier homes and neighborhoods.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Mixture of 1,1-dimethylethyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate and 2,2-bis(1,1-dimethylethylperoxy)butane |
| Other names |
Peroxan HX-B-35 Butanox LPT-IN |
| Pronunciation | /ˈmɪks.tʃər əv tɜːrt-ˈbjuː.tɪl pəˈrɒk.si tuː ˌiː.θɪlˈhɛk.səˌneɪt ənd tuː tuː daɪ tɜːrt-ˈbjuː.tɪl.pəˈrɒk.si bjuːˈteɪn/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 686-31-7 |
| 3D model (JSmol) | `3DModel:JSmol` |
| Beilstein Reference | 1910898 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:88209 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL6975 |
| ChemSpider | ChemSpider: 14496, 47463 |
| DrugBank | DB14158 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03-2119980102-56-XXXX |
| EC Number | “411-360-0” |
| Gmelin Reference | 1070138 |
| KEGG | C18604 |
| MeSH | Chemical Actions and Uses Category |
| PubChem CID | 173312206 |
| RTECS number | RG1891000 |
| UNII | U6750WMM4S |
| UN number | 3105 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C12H24O3, C16H34O4 |
| Molar mass | Varies (mixture, no single molar mass) |
| Appearance | Clear, colorless liquid |
| Odor | characteristic |
| Density | 0.91 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | insoluble |
| log P | 5.5 |
| Vapor pressure | < 0.1 hPa (20 °C) |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -9.97e-6 cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.430 |
| Viscosity | 15.3 mPa·s at 20°C |
| Dipole moment | 2.64 D |
| Hazards | |
| GHS labelling | GHS02, GHS07, GHS08 |
| Pictograms | GHS02,GHS07,GHS08 |
| Signal word | Danger |
| Hazard statements | H241, H302, H315, H317, H319, H332, H335 |
| Precautionary statements | P210, P220, P234, P235+P410, P240, P241, P280, P303+P361+P353, P305+P351+P338, P312, P370+P378, P403+P235, P411+P235, P501 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 2-4-3-W |
| Flash point | 76 °C |
| Autoignition temperature | 230 °C |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (oral, rat): > 5000 mg/kg |
| NIOSH | Not listed |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 0.05 ppm |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not established |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
tert-Butyl hydroperoxide Di-tert-butyl peroxide Cumene hydroperoxide Methyl ethyl ketone peroxide Acetylacetone peroxide Benzoyl peroxide tert-Butyl peroxyacetate tert-Butyl peroxybenzoate |
