© 2026 Sinochem Nanjing Corporation,
All Right Reserved
Organic peroxides have shaped the modern materials world, especially for industries that rely on plastics and rubbers. From the early days of rubber vulcanization to advanced composite manufacturing, each twist in chemical history pointed to more efficient, safer, and more versatile initiators. The rise of tert-butyl peroxides opened up doors for commercial polymerization methods in the mid-20th century, especially as the quest for controlled, low-emission processes heated up. Through the 1970s and 1980s, researchers and engineers experimented relentlessly—pushing often volatile chemistry into safer territory by using mixtures on inert carriers. The pairing of Tert-Butyl Peroxy-2-Ethylhexanoate and 2,2-Di-(Tert-Butylperoxy)Butane answered industry demands for polymerization systems that needed both a strong kickstart and stability. Regulations and safety concerns later sharpened focus on granular solids, ensuring transport and storage offered peace of mind amid massive scale. Now, their legacies tie directly to the plastics, automotive, and cable insulation sectors that power global manufacturing.
This mixture combines Tert-Butyl Peroxy-2-Ethylhexanoate at not more than 12% and 2,2-Di-(Tert-Butylperoxy)Butane up to 14%, stabilized with a type A diluent and an inert solid making up most of the formulation, usually above 60%. These ratios balance reactive strength with manageable risk. The granular form’s no-nonsense approach keeps it stable for storage and handling, which workers and logistics teams value. This blend plays a starring role in the controlled crosslinking of polyethylene and elastomers where users demand reliability, moderate reactivity, and flexibility over a wide range of conditions.
The granular appearance signals a product ready for industrial use, not some overstated laboratory concoction. Odorless or nearly so, it stands out because its paraffin-based carrier doesn’t invite unnecessary volatility. Tert-Butyl Peroxy-2-Ethylhexanoate and its di-tert-butyl cousin both break down within adjustable activation windows: the mixture holds up well in normal storage but springs into action above 125°C. Both peroxides release radicals at predictable intervals, which lets processors control polymer structure tightly. The inert solid soaks up excess heat, tamps down dust, and stops the “domino effect” of runaway decomposition. The overall density, melting point, and handling traits consistently meet expectations for industrial-scale blending and feeding into automated reactor systems.
Industry standards keep things simple, but not careless. Packaging highlights net peroxide content, batch data, stabilizer type, and carrier base. Labels display full hazard pictograms, shelf life, and storage temperature, not just for compliance, but because people on the floor rely on these details to set up safe material flows. Typical specs include tight limits on water, acid, and non-peroxide residues. Monitoring particle size distribution and flow rates tells downline operators that feeders, mixers, and extruders won’t get gummed up. Material safety datasheets make the rounds in every facility using this product—clear statements warn about eye exposure and the low, but real, risk of thermal runaway. The mixture holds several UN codes in transport—chemical companies and end-users never gloss over these legally binding details.
Chemists fuss over each reaction batch to get peroxide purities right and control side products. Tert-Butyl Peroxy-2-Ethylhexanoate comes from a reaction between tert-butyl hydroperoxide and the acid chloride of 2-ethylhexanoic acid, with care to limit over-reaction. 2,2-Di-(Tert-Butylperoxy)Butane often emerges from the alkylation of di-tert-butyl peroxide using butane under tightly monitored temperatures and solvent conditions—anything too fast invites hazardous byproducts. Blending both peroxides with a type A diluent means equipment stays cool, and explosions stay theoretical. Final granulation with at least 60% inert solid, usually precipitated calcium carbonate or specialty silica, physically separates the reactive molecules. Engineers run blending and granulation slowly, checking particle behavior and distribution in real-time because even a small “hot spot” in the batch can cause headaches or shut down production entirely. Scale-up from pilot plant to full manufacturing lines draws on years of process data—shortcutting basic safety or patience risks both people and output.
Both peroxides excel in controlled radical generation. Deploying the mixture in polyethylene crosslinking, for example, means radicals snip and bind polymer chains for results that show up as tougher, heat-resistant materials. Unmodified, these peroxides work best for standard polyolefin processes. Researchers sometimes modify the blend—tweaking the proportion of actives or introducing co-initiators—if a specific end polymer needs sharper molecular weight distribution or branching. The type A diluent is chosen to remain chemically neutral during intended reactions but occasionally swaps out if the downstream polymers would foul up fluidity. The structure’s tert-butyl groups slow breakdown just enough to grant workable curing windows without compromising throughput at modern plastics plants. In joint research programs, clever use of transition metal salts might be introduced to tweak decomposition rate, but operators always watch for unintended colors or byproducts in finished polymers as a tradeoff.
Chemicals rarely go by one street name for long. Tert-Butyl Peroxy-2-Ethylhexanoate shows up in lab speak as TBPEH, and more market-facing as Butanox LPT or Perkadox 16. For 2,2-Di-(Tert-Butylperoxy)Butane, the aliases include DTB or Butanox PBO. Companies will blend these under brand names that signal safety—“Low-Dust Peroxide Mix A” or “Stable Peroxide Granule”—but smart users always crosscheck the fine print on certificates of analysis. In global trade, language changes but core chemical identity does not; users learn to double-check SDS and label details to keep procurement consistent and avoid costly batch mismatches.
Cutting corners with organic peroxides invites disaster, which history grimly reinforces. Industry standards (ISO, REACH, OSHA in the US) require segregated dry storage, constant ventilation, and airtight seals. Refrigeration at or below the manufacturer’s stated limits prevents premature activity—no one wants a warm batch on their shift. PPE—face shields, cut-resistant gloves, chemical aprons—are not a suggestion but the norm. Transportation uses specialized packaging: high-strength plastics and UN-rated drums that cushion shock and seal out moisture. Staff drills regular emergency protocols, including neutralization and disposal routes, because “rare” accidents eventually become headlines unless people stay sharp. In incident reports, nearly every major peroxide mishap can trace back to ignored housekeeping, rushed dilution, or blocked venting—small but deadly habits. Multinational operators roll out layers of safety, ensuring even temporary contractors understand this mixture never shares a room with combustion sources, acids, or reducing agents.
The most common “front-line” use for this mixture is crosslinking polyethylene to create PEX pipes—industries from construction to automotive depend on pipes and insulators that stand up to pressure, heat, and stubborn chemicals. Elastomer manufacturers use the mixture to build shock-absorbent bushing and seals found in just about every engine compartment and subway car. The electrical sector depends on the blend for cable sheathing, where crosslinked insulation delivers life-or-death reliability in power grids. Newer applications push into specialty foams and medical packaging that need cost-controlled toughness and sterilization-ready surfaces. Companies value the mixture’s predictable, moderate release of radicals, which smooths out production rates and delivers products that pass both legal and internal specs without rework. In composite manufacturing, especially for wind turbine blades and automotive body parts, the peroxide blend supports longer cure windows—critical for large molds without defects. Each plant tailors use conditions but relies on the same core chemical backbone that’s stood the test of decades.
Laboratories aren’t content just using the stuff as their grandparents did. Trends in R&D focus on lowering toxicity, boosting stability under higher throughput, and greening up both raw materials and end-of-life impacts. Polymer chemists keep hunting for synergists, hoping to squeeze out ever-lower levels of byproducts and finished-product odors. Testing at universities shows that fine-tuned ratios of the two peroxides hit key benchmarks for crosslink density and melt flow without inviting breakdown outside target windows. The granular carrier keeps popping up in studies as researchers dissect how particle morphology, surface area, and specific heats combine to grant or limit speed on future extrusion lines. There’s a steady push toward full cycle assessments—charting environmental footprints from raw peroxide synthesis through to safe end-of-life disposal or recycling of crosslinked materials. This kind of work puts pressure on suppliers to upgrade both documentation and the real-world transparency of claims. Allied research groups in Japan and Germany collaborate with manufacturers, sharing updated toxicity findings and new reactive-diluent blends—speeding up safer product tweaks that won’t kick up capital costs for existing plants.
Workers and residents near peroxide plants want honest risk answers, not marketing jargon. Toxicity studies measure both acute and chronic risks, centering on skin, eye, and respiratory exposure. For most people, direct skin contact can cause chemical burns or sensitization—not instant doom, but a real day-to-day irritant for production teams. With enough fumes, headaches and short-term lung effects surface. Chronic exposure doesn’t build the cancer clusters seen in vinyl monomer plants, but animal studies prod vigilance; repeated low-dose inhalation shows early signs of mild liver and kidney effects in rodents. Downstream, the crosslinked plastics don’t leach active peroxides, so end-users stay safer. Disposal, though, still asks for care, since residual mix in waste streams can trigger heat bursts or air pollution in landfills. Air monitoring and regular bloodwork at major plants reinforce that low-exposure standards protect workers, but real-world accidents still make the news—a reason for staying strict about housekeeping and not letting minor leaks slide.
Materials science rarely stands still. The coming years will see efforts to wring out even safer, smarter initiator systems and more energy-efficient crosslinking processes. Environmental rules get tighter, nudging manufacturers toward formulas with lower total peroxide and smarter, bio-based diluents. New application areas—think lightweight composites for electric vehicles, or high-temperature-resistant polymers for new solar installations—stretch the limits of what peroxides can enable. Digital automation of peroxide dosing will gear up, matching real-time feedback from sensors in extruders or reactors. Research will keep driving down toxicity and extending product lifespans by building in stabilizers and predictive process controls. Even as alternatives emerge, the old-school reliability and rugged performance of this blend will keep it on procurement lists worldwide, especially as infrastructure and electrification projects scale up. The international safety community will stay locked in, pressing both governments and companies to sharpen codes, not relax them—because the human cost of just one safety shortcut never fades from memory or the balance sheet.
Factories making plastics aren’t just cranking out toys and containers. They are engineering materials for medical gear, automotive parts, and even specialty films needed in food packaging. These two mouthfuls — tert-butyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate and 2,2-di-(tert-butylperoxy)butane — quietly power a transformation in these factories. Folks in the business often call them “peroxide initiators.” They take on a central job in kick-starting the reactions that turn liquid monomers into solid, practical polymers used every day.
Picture trying to start a bonfire with wet sticks — nothing much happens. But light up a good match, and the whole thing takes off. In the world of polymerization, this mixture acts like that match. The two peroxides, thanks to their carefully designed structures, help break apart monomers like ethylene or vinyl acetate, getting those molecules to link up into long, sturdy chains. Think low-density polyethylene (LDPE) for those familiar squeezable bottles, or EVA (ethylene vinyl acetate) which adds flexibility to plastics used in shoes and sporting goods.
Factories don’t just flip a switch and hope for the best. They lean heavily on mixtures like this because they control how fast the chemical reaction goes, the temperature needed, and even the texture and strength of the plastic at the end. For LDPE, control is the name of the game. You want a product strong enough for one job, but still soft and flexible for another. This peroxide blend lets manufacturers adjust the recipe so they don’t waste energy and raw materials, keeping costs in check and helping the environment too.
There’s more outside the obvious. This duo also supports another job — curing and crosslinking. That means helping glue together the inside structure of rubber and even cables, giving us wires that hold up in tough conditions. It’s an everyday safety and reliability issue. Quality-insulated cables keep buildings safe from fires caused by electrical faults. The same chemistry builds softer, tougher foams needed in car seats and yoga mats. Without the careful work of chemical initiators, these products would break down too soon or just not work.
Getting the mix right doesn’t just matter for a product’s performance; it’s about keeping people safe. Organic peroxides can be tricky; anyone familiar with them knows they demand respect. Companies stick to strict guidelines for storage, temperature, and transport. Storms or power cuts can turn stable mixtures into fire hazards. Industry and safety experts share regular updates about incident prevention, and manufacturers invest in worker training and emergency planning.
Looking ahead, there’s real talk about making this chemistry greener. More companies now look at peroxide initiator blends as a way to fine-tune processes so less energy gets burned off during production. Cleaner production lines mean cleaner air and less waste. Third-party testing holds factories accountable to both local and international environmental standards. Every time a plastic product gets used longer, recycled easier, or made with less waste, that’s a win that starts with carefully chosen chemical recipes.
Working with chemical mixtures doesn't only happen in sleek research labs. Gardeners, cleaners, mechanics, hobbyists, and factory workers run into mixtures every week. I remember mixing fertilizer at home, thinking gloves would slow me down. Ten minutes in, a little burn on my hand convinced me otherwise. One small misstep—like skipping gloves or a mask—turns a routine task into a health risk. Chemical burns, respiratory irritation, and worse injuries can sneak up on anyone. Safety serves more than rules: it’s protection for skin, lungs, eyes, and peace of mind.
Reading the label seems basic, but that’s where I’ve seen mistakes add up. Manufacturers spell out crucial details right there: which gloves actually work, whether a mixture demands eye protection, or if fumes might build up in a closed area. Far from being nitpicky, these details stand between a safe day at work and a trip to the clinic.
No one gets a thrill out of lab coats or safety goggles, but they stop acids and oils from eating through clothes. Even a tiny splash can cause lasting damage. Long sleeves, sturdy shoes, and chemical-resistant gloves can turn a hazardous procedure into a manageable task. After my own close call with strong detergent splashing under my glasses, I never skip the goggles.
It’s easy to underestimate the power of fumes. Many mixtures release gases you can’t always see or smell. Spending an hour in a poorly ventilated room leads to headaches or dizziness. I always crack open a window or work outside if the label mentions vapors. Fume hoods aren’t just lab equipment; an open garage door or a sturdy fan in a shed can go a long way.
Accidental mixing caused more issues in my garage than anything else. I once stored bleach near a container for toilet cleaner. Later, a friend almost combined them, unaware that this creates toxic chlorine gas. Proper labeling saves lives. Neat storage on designated shelves or cabinets also keeps curious kids and pets from stumbling into danger. Even experienced people get tripped up if containers go unmarked. Double-checking labels and storing incompatible chemicals apart could mean the difference between an ordinary day and an emergency.
Even with the best routine, accidents still happen. I always keep a basic first aid kit and quick access to running water in case of splashes. Knowing where the eyewash or emergency shower is located, or at home, having a clear path to a bathroom sink, can stop minor accidents from turning serious. The number for the local poison control center belongs on the fridge or phone contact list. I’ve had to call once, and quick advice cut down my worry and got the right care started.
Some team members can get too comfortable and skip steps. I make it a point to remind coworkers and family that safety is everyone’s job. Keeping up to date with new handling procedures, swapping stories of past mistakes, and making sure the right gear is always on hand keeps safety real and practical. Mistakes happen, but preparation builds a shield between everyday work and unexpected harm. Staying aware and protective means no one gets left with preventable injuries or regrets.
Long ago, I threw a bottle of vitamins in a steamy bathroom cabinet. After a few weeks, I pulled out soft, half-melted tablets. That taught me quick—where and how products sit matters as much as what’s on the label. Proper storage keeps everything from food to medicine working the way it should. Ignoring storage directions means wasted money or worse, something unsafe on your hands.
Many products don’t take kindly to the stress of being hot one minute and cold the next. A bottle of cough syrup going from a steaming kitchen to a chilly garage can break down or lose its punch. Most medications and supplements prefer stable, room-temp spots—think of a closet shelf over a windowless pantry. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) points out that temperature shifts and heat will reduce potency or even spoil products faster. It’s like ice cream that melts and refreezes: the texture isn’t the same, and neither is the quality.
Sunlight does more than brighten a room; it slowly drains color and effectiveness from things like vitamins, skincare, and some foods. Ever seen a bottle wrapped in dark glass? It’s not for looks. Ultraviolet rays break down certain ingredients, and manufacturers know it. Direct sunlight and fluorescent lights can turn a reliable product into something weak or even risky. Keeping tablets, creams, or serums in dark, dry spaces saves chemical makeups from breaking down before their time.
Think of crackers that go soft once you leave the box open. Products with sensitive ingredients will also clump, dissolve, or sprout mold if left in humid spots. Picture desiccant packets in pill bottles—those little do-not-eat packs serve a real purpose. They soak up stray moisture and add weeks, sometimes months, to a product’s life. A dry drawer or cupboard, far from sinks or showers, works better than any fancy container.
Twisting the cap back on may seem obvious, but I’ve been there—hurriedly setting aside a jar, only to find it stale or ruined days later. A tight seal keeps out air, which can speed up oxidation or bring in mold. You might not see what’s happening on a micro level, but you’ll taste or smell it fast enough. Sealed containers defend against contamination and extend shelf life.
Some instructions seem strict for no reason, but ignoring expiration dates leads to unpredictable results. The date isn’t just a suggestion; it’s a sign of when testing guarantees the product stays safe. Research from the American Medical Association shows active compounds often break down past a certain point, losing their original benefit. It’s tempting to gamble, but sticking to the date avoids accidental waste or trouble.
Clear, direct labeling takes worry out of storage. Look for guidance like “store in a cool, dry place” or “avoid direct sunlight.” These aren’t empty warnings—they’re based on real testing. From my experience, keeping products as directed pays off, whether it’s the pantry or medicine cabinet. For tricky cases, like refrigerated probiotics, an extra fridge thermometer helps guarantee the right temperature.
Storage tips don’t just protect what you’ve bought—they protect your health and wallet too. Paying attention and setting up smart storage habits goes further than you think.
Walking through industrial facilities, labs, or even cleaning out my garage, I’ve seen the warning labels and smelled the sharp tang of chemical mixtures. Many people imagine single chemicals doing damage, but mixtures bring their own risks because chemicals can interact, amplify, or create new dangers not seen in any individual ingredient.
Eyes sting, skin reddens, and lungs choke when toxic blends get airborne. A mix of solvents can irritate airways more than each solvent alone. People often brush off these symptoms, thinking the body will recover. In reality, repeated contact leads to “sensitization”—your immune system remembers, and next time the reaction could become severe. I've seen co-workers go from occasional rashes to full-blown hives and asthma attacks simply from cleaning solutions at work.
Health gets chipped away day by day, especially if workplace safety cuts corners. Certain chemical groups, like phthalates or polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, can act as hormone disruptors. Low doses may not trigger warning signs at the start but over months or years, changes can creep in—fatigue, trouble sleeping, headaches, or memory slips. Chemicals like benzene damage bone marrow, lead to anemia, and raise the risk of leukemia. These outcomes stick with people for life.
Chemicals do not always act alone. Studies on pesticides show that combined exposure can make kidneys and liver work even harder to filter toxins, increasing the risk of organ damage. Mixing bleach and ammonia creates toxic chloramine vapors capable of causing acute lung injury—something many people learned the hard way during pandemic home cleaning binges. Instead of canceling each other out, some mixtures can become much more dangerous for our organs and immune defenses.
Employers must carry responsibility. I’ve visited places where respirators sit unused and spill kits gather dust, even though OSHA regulations demand personal protective equipment and hazard communication. Short safety meetings and quick training sessions don’t always prepare workers for real risks. Clear labeling and real-life demos on handling chemicals go further than any memo.
Awareness kicks off every change. People should know that mixing common products at home can lead to hospital visits or worse. Basic caution, such as proper ventilation, gloves, and never combining unknown substances, saves lives. In a work setting, keeping up-to-date on safety data sheets, reporting symptoms early, and supporting a culture of honesty about exposure make the difference. Sweeping problems under the rug doesn’t only create legal risk—it harms people’s health for years ahead.
Real safety progress comes when industry and government work together to identify and regulate not just individual chemicals, but common mixtures too. Research and transparency—testing, sharing results, and adjusting workplace rules based on new findings—help everyone breathe easier. I’ve seen families forever changed by avoidable chemical injuries. Clear information and common sense precautions can prevent the next tragedy from happening.
Walking through any hardware store or supermarket, shelves burst with household cleaners, glues, batteries, and electronic gadgets. Each one seems harmless at first glance, especially when they boast promises like “powerful cleaning” or “ultra-long life.” What often stays hidden is the web of rules and safeguards built around these conveniences. Stories about product recalls or water contamination remind us that rules—those long documents in government archives—shape the kind of stuff we let into homes and toss out afterward.
Nothing felt more personal than the day I learned about the dangers of mercury in old thermometers from an elementary school science class. My teacher told us about rivers near factories turning toxic, farmers unable to grow crops, and neighborhood families facing health problems. Long before I understood the alphabet soup of acronyms like EPA, FDA, or REACH, the message stuck: unchecked chemicals bring real-life misery.
Rules didn’t pop up out of nowhere. In the United States, the Clean Air Act and Toxic Substances Control Act set the stage. In Europe, REACH digs even deeper, making companies prove that chemicals in their products won’t poison people or wildlife. No company can pour solvents down a drain, slip lead into toys, or spray pesticides in a schoolyard without facing consequences. These rules—often invisible until the evening news calls out a headline—keep disasters at bay more often than anyone realizes.
Years ago, flame retardant chemicals went into everything from couches to baby pajamas. Only after numerous studies found links to cancer and hormone disruption did outrage grow. The shift to safer alternatives moved slowly; manufacturers argued about cost, while families lost trust. The story plays out with microplastics in soaps and phthalates in packaging. Without oversight, companies have little incentive to pick up the slack on their own.
Loopholes emerge when rules lag behind new inventions. E-cigarettes hit shelves long before agencies could even define them, so their health and fire risks spread quietly. The same thing happens with nanomaterials—tiny particles with big questions about long-term effects. Regulators play catch-up, asking for more studies and new labeling rules only after problems pop up.
Even with rules, shoppers can nudge companies further. People ask questions and look for certifications like Green Seal, Energy Star, or “BPA-free.” Lawmakers pay more attention if their voters care about plastic waste, harmful dyes, or dangerous battery disposal. When someone in my town called out a landfill for dumping electronics into local creeks, neighbors joined petitions. It pushed the city council to set up a free e-waste collection site, saving water and fish along the way.
No single group can shoulder the responsibility. Watchdogs and non-profits help unmask the dangers that slip through regulatory cracks. Companies—facing both legal fines and viral social media backlash—sometimes react quicker to public outcry than to outdated rules. Parents, teachers, and anyone who opens the box on a “new and improved” product have a say in what safety means.
Ignoring safety and environmental rules leads to short-term profits and long-term messes. Paying attention, speaking up, and voting with dollars will keep dangerous substances out and cleaner alternatives in.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Mixture of 1,1-dimethylethyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate and 2,2-bis(1,1-dimethylethylperoxy)butane |
| Other names |
Mixture of tert-butyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate and 2,2-di-(tert-butylperoxy)butane, mixture with inert solid Perbutyl EH/Perbutyl B mixture on inert carrier Mixture of organic peroxides on inert carrier |
| Pronunciation | /ˈmɪks.tʃər ʌv tɜːtˈbɜː.tɪl pəˈrɒk.si tuː ˌiː.θɪlˈhɛk.səˌneɪt ənd tuː ˈtuː daɪ tɜːtˈbɜː.tɪl pəˈrɒk.si ˈbjuː.teɪn/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 2227052-13-6 |
| Beilstein Reference | 3981532 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:88222 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL2184232 |
| ChemSpider | 21558168 |
| DrugBank | |
| ECHA InfoCard | 07-1-1080068095-61-0000 |
| EC Number | 402-320-1 |
| Gmelin Reference | 2526921 |
| KEGG | C18548 |
| MeSH | Chemical Industry Products |
| PubChem CID | 135616772 |
| RTECS number | RG3600000 |
| UNII | D6W6ZAB7ZP |
| UN number | 3105 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C12H24O3, C16H34O4 |
| Molar mass | Varies (mixture; individual components: Tert-butyl peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate: 230.32 g/mol, 2,2-Di-(tert-butylperoxy)butane: 262.40 g/mol) |
| Appearance | White granules |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.2 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | insoluble |
| log P | 3.7 |
| Vapor pressure | < 0.01 hPa (20 °C) |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -7.4e-6 cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.469 |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | V03AB38 |
| Hazards | |
| GHS labelling | GHS02, GHS07, Danger, H242, H315, H317, P210, P220, P234, P261, P264, P270, P280, P302+P352, P305+P351+P338, P333+P313, P337+P313, P363, P370+P378, P403+P235, P405, P501 |
| Pictograms | GHS02, GHS07, GHS08 |
| Signal word | Danger |
| Hazard statements | H242, H317, H319, H335 |
| Precautionary statements | P210, P220, P221, P234, P261, P264, P270, P271, P280, P301+P330+P331, P303+P361+P353, P304+P340, P305+P351+P338, P311, P321, P337+P313, P363, P370+P378, P403+P235, P405, P501 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 2-4-4-⧫ |
| Flash point | > 80 °C |
| Autoignition temperature | 210 °C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (oral, rat) > 5000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (oral, rat): >5000 mg/kg |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | NIOSH: Not established |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Tert-Butyl Peroxy-2-Ethylhexanoate 2,2-Di-(Tert-Butylperoxy)Butane Type A Diluent Inert Solid |
