Mercurous oxide, known to the seasoned chemist as Hg2O, has a legacy knitted closely with mercury's long and controversial history. Alchemists began noticing its striking red hue before modern chemistry sorted out its true composition. The substance caught notice during the ragged edges of the eighteenth century, when researchers, eager to understand what lay behind mercury’s multiple personalities, began to prepare it from mercurous salts—long before digital controls monitored purity or production. Early descriptions mark it as a product from the careful precipitation of mercurous nitrate. Papers published in the nineteenth century tried to pinpoint its properties, shapes, and responses to heat, but most labs couldn’t get past its sensitivity and instability, leaving many murder mysteries for modern scientists to solve. A few famous names like Berzelius and Gay-Lussac added their own twists to the story, shaping a rough chronology that still guides today’s researchers hoping to use the old findings for new ends.
Mercurous oxide comes out as a brick-red or brownish powder, and it keeps its color no matter how a lab brings it to life. Anyone who shakes out a fresh sample quickly smells a faint metallic tang. Supplies come sealed against light and air, since the powder will slowly lose its grip and let mercury metal form on its surface. Today’s chemical suppliers still offer it in tightly controlled bottles, intended for analysts and researchers since its toxicity cuts off many potential day-to-day uses. The oxide stands apart from mercuric oxide (HgO): its chemistry, stability, and handling rules call for a level of vigilance—and respect—that never fades, no matter how long a sample sits in a storeroom.
Holding a sample, you might spot its crystal structure under a microscope—needle-shaped, light plays off each sharp edge. The powder does not dissolve in water, making filtration a must in every synthetic step involving mercurous ions. On hitting the magic number of 355°C, mercurous oxide turns back to its elemental parents: vaporous mercury and oxygen, a change quickened by light or rough handling. Exposing the substance to even low-intensity UV lamps can leave behind greasy mercury stains. Some textbooks note how this oxide will not put up with acids; the faintest hint of HCl, for example, transforms it into mercurous chloride, known as calomel. Stomach acids do the same when it ends up as a medical or laboratory mistake, a lesson painfully learned through centuries of toxicology.
Labs expect strict reporting on purity, heavy metal contamination, and origin. Bottles bear GHS hazard statements, use-by dates, lot numbers, storage guidance, and disposal instructions in bold. Certificates often report trace impurities—lead, cadmium, arsenic, and especially mercuric oxide, since even tiny cross-contamination can throw off research or risk user health. Manufacturers label shipment containers with UN numbers, and “For laboratory use only” warnings show up on every invoice or online listing. Safety Data Sheets lay out risks: avoid skin contact, never inhale dust, and clean contaminated equipment only with specialty detergents. If you don’t see clear hazard and safety info, it’s probably not the real thing. Trustworthy chemical catalogs supply not only technical data, but a record of batch testing for regulatory compliance.
Old procedures instruct chemists to start with simple mercurous nitrate, a salt made by dissolving mercury in dilute nitric acid and cooling to keep the mercurous state stable. Adding freshly prepared sodium or potassium hydroxide dropwise gives a rich red precipitate—that’s the prized oxide. The trick always comes down to working in dim light, since bright conditions can ruin yield. In analytical-scale syntheses, the collected oxide filter cake is washed again and again with cold water, then dried in a vacuum desiccator to keep its surface clean and free of absorbed moisture. Some labs use alternate paths, like the oxidation of pure mercury with a limited supply of atmospheric oxygen at controlled temperatures, but the bulk of experimentalists stick with wet chemistry for its predictability. Most procedures shy away from scale: nobody wants loose mercury vapor in the air if mistakes can be avoided.
Mercurous oxide never existed just to sit on a shelf. Its main value comes from how quickly it reacts—with acids, with halides, even with reducing agents. Once introduced to hydrochloric acid, the result is calomel, a mainstay antiseptic of the Victorian era, and a cautionary reminder today. Nitric acid wipes out the mercurous state entirely, plunging everything to the mercuric series. In basic environments, mercurous oxide lingers, offering a few interesting byproducts only chemists chase. Some researchers used it for delicate reductions, taking advantage of the oxide’s readiness to flip between valence states. Its behavior on standing and its tendency to decompose made it valuable as a teaching tool in decomposition and redox labs. Still, the chemical’s reactivity can’t escape the shadow of its toxicity, so every reaction needs careful planning and tight controls, above all during disposal.
Open any reference text and the aliases spool out: mercurous monoxide, mercury(I) oxide, dichloride monoxide, red oxide of mercury. Some trade catalogs use the archaic “hydrargyrum oxydulatum rubrum,” mostly for historical or regional reasons. Across global languages, labels converge on the basic picture of “mercurous” and “oxide.” Regulatory filings sometimes reference its presence by these synonyms, so anyone doing compliance work has to keep track of every name under which it can be purchased or shipped. Many import and export forms cross-use these terms, causing headaches without clear label matching. Old literature makes this even trickier, so researchers and product managers track synonyms to avoid costly mistakes that could affect safety or regulatory standing.
Careless handling of mercurous oxide shows up in poison control logs and environmental reports. It stands among substances flagged by OSHA, NIOSH, and the European Chemicals Agency. Fume hoods are not a suggestion—the risk of airborne mercury in closed spaces rises with every spill or shake of the bottle. Full PPE is the only way: lab coats, butyl gloves, and glasses. Used material never goes in a regular trash can; it travels in sealed containers as hazardous waste to a certified treatment facility. The substance’s instability under air and light means even old samples need periodic inspection to keep labs and storerooms free from elemental mercury contamination. Air monitoring and surface wipes are part of routine protocols in regulated environments. Training for new and experienced staff centers not just on safe handling, but recognition of symptoms tied to low-level, chronic exposure. Safe storage—cool, dry, sealed, and under a lock—prevents unauthorized or accidental use. Every bottle comes with batch records, MSDS attachments, and compliance statements that trace its journey from supplier to shelf.
The main career of mercurous oxide has never strayed far from specialized laboratories. It once held courts in analytical chemistry, where its ability to act as a controlled oxidizer or reducer made it valuable in gravimetric and volumetric assays, especially before modern instrumentation. For a while, some battery designers took a stab at using it inside special mercurous oxide-zinc cells, but toxicity and environmental persistence stopped that line of development. In organic synthesis, it pops up here and there, used in making unique organomercury intermediates or as a gentle agent in selected coupling reactions. Very few schools teach with it now, pushing safety above tradition, so most application notes and technical literature come straight from committed research teams or specialized industrial shops handling legacy products or recycling. No large-scale, open market use survives, since regulatory costs and liabilities outstrip technical value for nearly every customer.
The bulk of current research into mercurous oxide sits at the edges—historical curiosities revisited with modern techniques, toxicity studies probing the boundary layers between mercury’s forms, and process improvement work for safe handling or elimination. Analytical chemists pair it against modern standards to check for metal stability in legacy equipment. Few new patents list it as a primary ingredient; its research pulse softens each decade as restrictions on mercury rise. Some curiosity-driven studies focus on nanoparticles, exploring what size reduction does to its photo-reactivity and potential to serve as a unique reactant in tightly controlled experiments. One or two environmental labs look for better decomposition protocols as they clean up spills or historical waste sites, testing possible bioremediation or secure stabilization measures. Publications on remediation outpace those on new utility. Still, R&D teams check the old references for insights on how to handle and neutralize mercurous waste, especially in facilities bound by tougher European or North American rules.
Nearly any study that looks at mercurous oxide winds up in the toxicology archives. The substance, when handled without protection, finds its way into the body through inhalation, ingestion, and skin contact. Mercury’s two-valence form, once thought less harmful than the three-valence states, hasn’t earned a pass from regulators. Inhaling even a skinny cloud of dust may slowly build neurotoxic effects, and past industries paid dearly for ignoring these risks. Animal research points to nervous system effects first, then kidneys and liver. Evidence runs strong enough that international treaties now draw thick boundaries around all mercury compounds, and medical journals echo the risks with every new exposure case. Industrial hygiene studies from the last fifty years catalog chronic low-level exposure, tying tremors, memory loss, and kidney problems back to time in labs or factories handling mercurous compounds. Countries update their permissible exposure limits with every addition to the mercury research portfolio, and periodic reviews of industrial practices keep pressure on users to ring-fence all mercury uses under the toughest controls possible.
Prospects for mercurous oxide tip down. Regulatory pressure blocks most commercial growth. Laboratories find modern replacements for nearly every useful property the oxide offered, from specialty redox chemistry to analytical reference solutions. Investments chase safer alternatives, putting the old red powder onto shelves under “restricted substance” lists. Environmental stewardship and public health programs only intensify these trends, setting ever-stricter disposal, transport, and registration rules. Anyone hoping for a renaissance in its applied uses faces a thin market—one where safety, liability, and environmental cost continually outweigh utility. Future research keeps its eyes on cleanup, safe elimination, and historical forensics, rather than new product development or wider industrial acceptance. The chapter may never fully close, but each passing year makes room for stricter rules, deeper caution, and a focus on learning from every lesson mercury’s history has written.
Mercurous oxide, a dull red powder, looks unassuming in the bottle. A lot of chemistry students meet it for the first time in the lab, hearing warnings about its toxic nature. Scientists mix it up for its power as an oxidizing agent, usually with electricity in mind. Decades ago, battery makers relied on it, especially for mercury batteries found in cameras, watches, calculators, and hearing aids. Those small batteries fired up everyday gadgets. Mercurous oxide helped shape portable electronics long before lithium took the spotlight. People trusted these batteries for their steady voltage, which kept their gadgets running smoothly.
Outside batteries, this compound acted as a lab workhorse. Chemists tested for the presence of other materials, using reactions that only worked with a touch of mercurous oxide. In classrooms, teachers demonstrated redox reactions for students, watching the oxide break down and release oxygen gas. It’s got another side too—it can help make certain types of inorganic compounds. That rarely hits the news, but it matters to folks working with novel materials or vintage chemical processes.
Toxicity shadows any practical use of mercurous oxide. Mercury compounds bring a long list of health hazards. Dust from handling, or accidental ingestion, can poison people or animals. Mercury attacks the nervous system, harming memory, movement, and mood. Most countries cracked down hard on mercury-based products. The United States and much of Europe don’t allow mercurous oxide batteries for consumer use anymore. Spent batteries wind up leaking mercury, contaminating soil and water. I’ve witnessed community efforts to clean up old dumps where mercury waste seeped into the ground. The worry in neighbors’ eyes tells the full story. Once mercury escapes, it’s stubborn and persistent. It gets into fish, moves up the food chain, and lands on our plates. Taking risks for minor convenience doesn’t add up, not after weighing the cost to the environment and our health.
We learned this the hard way. Towns near industrial sites fought brain damage and other health crises after mercury exposure. The Minamata disaster in Japan stands as a monument to poor regulation—it wasn’t mercurous oxide directly, but every use of mercury carries similar risks if not respected.
Technology leaves toxic relics behind, and mercurous oxide belongs in that camp. For 21st-century living, alternatives round out the options—zinc-air batteries for hearing aids, lithium for high-drain gadgets, alkaline for remotes and toys. Recycling efforts now treat mercury with extra care. Laws require old batteries and bulbs to be collected safely and recycled with strict oversight. Teachers pivot to safer laboratory demonstrations. Cleanup crews remove mercury from abandoned industrial sites, hoping to undo past mistakes.
Learning from history leads to better decision-making. Treating old chemicals with respect, keeping sharp limits on their use, and embracing alternatives where possible—these steps protect families, especially children, from a legacy of harm. I’ve seen community programs for safe disposal grow year after year; folks want to do right, given half the chance. That’s what progress means—learning what to keep, and what to leave behind for good.
Mercurous oxide tells a story of useful invention mixed with unexpected consequences. It opened doors in early electronics and chemistry education, but it slammed others shut when toxic dangers appeared. Safer options lead today’s charge. Nobody wants a reminder of mercury poisoning in their backyard or kitchen. Steering clear, managing waste, and treating chemicals knowledgeably keeps us safer and healthier moving forward.
Schools once kept jars of mercurous oxide tucked away in chemical closets. This reddish or yellow powder never seemed as worrisome as acids or solvents, but anyone who handled it learned to wash their hands. It carries a simple warning: it contains mercury, a metal with a reputation that scares anyone who’s seen stories about “Mad Hatter’s Disease.” I remember classmates peering at the warning labels, barely concerned, treating it like just another stuffy rule from the teacher.
Mercurous oxide poses a real risk to health, mostly because of the mercury itself. Even small exposures, over time, can cause damage to kidneys, brains, and nerves. Mercury takes a long time to leave the body, and its effects sometimes sneak up years after exposure. Researchers have linked mercury poisoning to memory trouble, speech issues, vision changes, and tremors. Kids and pregnant women face higher threats since their bodies develop fast and absorb more.
Mercury in any form doesn’t belong inside your body. Breathing dust or fumes can push mercury into your lungs where it slips into the bloodstream. Touching mercurous oxide powder may cause mercury to get through your skin and build up quietly, without clear warnings at first. Even inhaling a tiny amount day after day can turn into big problems for health.
Back in a Chicago high school, several students started feeling dizzy and sick after a container of mercurous oxide broke open. Clean-up teams wearing protective gear took days to scrub surfaces and air out the building. Blood tests showed that a few students carried higher levels of mercury than they should. Stories like that rarely make big news, but they point to an issue found in more places than people think.
Mercurous oxide once turned up in batteries and sometimes slipped into paints or pesticides, so it lingers in older buildings and forgotten storerooms. The World Health Organization counts mercury among the top ten chemicals of major public health concern. According to the CDC, even brief exposure can trigger weakness or headaches, and long-term exposure affects vital organs.
Good science teachers stay clear of mercurous oxide now, replacing it with less risky materials for experiments. People who work in demolition, recycling, or labs get required training and strict protocols for hazardous substances. Using gloves, masks, and proper storage cuts down on exposure. Regular health checks for workers help, but mistakes still happen when guidelines get overlooked.
For years, environmental groups have called for clear labeling and better disposal rules for chemicals with mercury. The United Nations’ Minamata Convention aims to limit mercury use globally. More countries phase out mercury where they can, pushing for cleaner options in products and labs. It takes effort from policymakers, every business using these chemicals, and citizens who demand safe practices.
My own time around mercurous oxide taught me not to take chemical safety lightly. Reading research, talking to health experts, and respecting the damage mercury can do—these steps help protect families, workers, and everyone who could come across substances like mercurous oxide. Ignoring these risks means putting health on the line for today and years down the road.
Mercurous oxide, known by chemists as Hg2O, calls for respect in storage. This substance presents real dangers if overlooked in clerical routines or left to chance by folks new to chemical safety. Raise the stakes to any professional setting—school lab, industrial storeroom, or research outpost—and the rules stay the same: avoid moisture, control temperature, and steer clear of sunlight. Water mixes with mercurous oxide and transforms it, raising the risk for even bigger hazards. Sunlight pushes decomposition, yet heat sources can do even more damage, making vapor spills and exposure a threat.
People sometimes underestimate how mercurous oxide changes in a humid space. I store it in containers with real, tested seals. Good lids make all the difference. Glass containers, fitted with airtight caps, fend off both moisture and outside dust. Folk in older laboratories remember leaky tins and cabinets, but modern storage leaves little room for mistakes.
Every bottle needs a clear label. Labels warn anyone who comes near, no matter the job title or experience level. Even the best-trained staff can be caught out, especially in busy labs. Use bold ink, stick to proper chemical names, and keep emergency information in clear view. Quick identification means faster response in a spill, stopping accidents before they spiral out of control.
Mercurous oxide reacts with acids, ammonia, and strong reducing agents. Witnessing a shelf fire in a shared storeroom once, all from improper stacking, hammered home the need for segregation. Chemicals that clash must stay far apart. Skip the old janitor closet or the hot shelf above a radiator. Seek a spot cool, ventilated, and dedicated to only those chemicals approved for company. Fire-resistant cabinets built for toxics give one more layer of insurance.
Many schools let the old supplies gather dust. Don't. Buy small amounts. One container at a time fits the real need of most projects. I’ve watched neglected chemicals degrade, creating risks nobody wants. Rotate stock, keep a dated log, and discard anything past its prime with licensed disposal services.
Mercurous oxide gives off toxic mercury vapor, especially if disturbed or heated. Folks storing or handling this chemical must wear the right kit—gloves, goggles, a long-sleeved lab coat, and never work alone. Good habits stop accidents. Store spill kits nearby and train every teammate in cleanup, so a dropped jar doesn’t become tomorrow’s headline.
Don’t stay silent if something looks wrong. Safety grows out of routine checks, honest conversations, and the courage to update old habits. New chemists can learn from veterans, but stubborn traditions fall behind modern safety standards. Old guidance from regulatory bodies like OSHA and NIOSH keeps the whole team sharp. In my experience, reporting near-misses—without fear of blame—catch issues long before they become tragedies.
Safeguarding mercurous oxide isn’t just about ticking off rules. Smart storage means keeping people healthy, preserving expensive stock, and building a lab culture where safety is worth the extra step. Those small efforts today protect everyone tomorrow.
Mercurous oxide doesn’t pop up in conversation outside lab walls, but it leaves a mark on both science and industry. Take a look at that formula: Hg2O. Two mercury atoms for every oxygen. It’s not a random pairing. That ratio tells a story about how mercury behaves with oxygen, and a story about how chemistry isn’t just mixing things together, but making sure they fit.
Years spent handling chemicals in high school chemistry brings back the memory of how much hinges on getting formulas right. One slip-up and the whole reaction changes. Mercurous oxide stands out because it’s built from the +1 oxidation state of mercury—each atom gladly sharing one electron. Mercury doesn’t often do that. Most often, you find its “cousin” compound, mercuric oxide, which goes by HgO, with just one mercury for each oxygen.
This formula—Hg2O—calls for two Hg+ ions stuck together. Think of it a bit like the old saying: two heads are better than one. Chemical bonds rely on those relationships. That’s not just theory; it matters in labs, in manufacturing, in safety. You catch the difference if you work with batteries or attempt to study how compounds break down under heat. Mistake mercurous oxide for its single-mercury cousin and you won’t get the reaction you planned.
The practical work gets tied up with concern. Mercury doesn’t get a warm welcome anymore. Historical stories about mercury in medical compounds show why. Toxicity flipped the script—what used to be common has become rare. Modern science supports the fact: mercury poisoning is real, with neurological and environmental risks that can’t be swept under the rug. That’s the experience in a nutshell—reading about the Mad Hatter’s illness wasn’t just a fun fact; it was a warning about exposure we took too lightly for generations.
Even so, mercurous oxide keeps a niche in research settings. Certain electrochemical cells, and old-fashioned batteries, depend on it. It’s still possible to synthesize this compound in a lab by gently warming mercury with oxygen, or more often, by reacting mercurous nitrate with an alkali. That’s not something you do without proper equipment, training, and a sharp respect for risks. Anyone thinking about chemistry as a field should carry that lesson: every formula is a promise, but also a responsibility.
The future doesn’t ignore history’s warnings. Mercury and its compounds have slipped out of children’s toys and household products for a reason. Countries around the globe set limits on mercury waste and move toward safer tech. This isn’t a problem with a single fix. Progress means swapping out mercurous oxide for safer materials wherever possible. It means recycling old batteries, investing in research, and teaching new scientists about both the amazing complexity and the lurking dangers of inorganic compounds.
The chemical formula of mercurous oxide doesn’t just tell you what’s inside the bottle; it signals a story much bigger than itself. Environmental impact, human health, and the lessons learned in labs, classrooms, and regulatory offices—they all trace back to a small formula: Hg2O.
Mercurous oxide carries a bad reputation for good reason. The presence of mercury in any compound stirs up concern. Even in small doses, mercury exposure causes serious problems—neurological issues, kidney damage, and harm to unborn children top the list. Mercurous oxide isn't just a dust you can shake off. Once it enters the body, mercury lingers and builds up.
Some folks think gloves and a lab coat give plenty of protection. From time in a college chemistry lab, just one spill taught me the hard way: mercurial compounds have a sneaky way of sticking around. Tiny crystals wedge themselves under fingernails or tuck into shoe seams. Cleaning up takes patience and good habits.
A sturdy pair of nitrile gloves can provide a layer against accidental contact. Not all gloves block mercury compounds—latex won’t cut it. Safety goggles are standard, but anyone who has wiped mercury dust from their lashes gets serious about face protection. A fitted lab coat and closed shoes stop the dust from getting where it doesn’t belong.
Safety equipment makes a difference, but real safety starts beforehand. Preparation wins over improvisation. Every chemical container receives a clear label. Tools and glassware stay dry and spotless; water turns mercurous oxide unstable, risking a reaction that releases toxic mercury vapor. A fume hood must run the entire time, sucking away anything loose in the air.
No eating, no drinking, and no absent-minded touching the face. Risks rise with every slip of discipline. Supervisors keep standards strict for a reason. Over the years, I watched new lab members forget these rules and pay for it with minor exposure—headaches, rashes, sometimes more severe symptoms.
Mercurous oxide stays in tightly sealed containers, never left out for “just a minute.” Steady, moderate temperatures help avoid decomposition that turns the powder into even more dangerous gases. Acidic fumes and sunlight speed up that breakdown. Keeping all mercury compounds in a dedicated cabinet, far from acids, makes sense for anyone working in a shared space.
Accidents can happen fast. Spills call for special kits—sulfur powder, paper towels, and airtight bags. No sweeping, no vacuuming, since these only make a bad problem worse. The only safe option relies on wet methods with extreme care and immediate disposal.
Throwing mercurous oxide in the regular trash could poison a landfill. Chemical waste teams handle it. I learned early that following strict disposal procedures protects everyone downstream—wastewater workers, the environment, and the broader community.
Regular health checks make sense for anyone working with mercury compounds. Low, slow exposure adds up. Many facilities require periodic blood and urine screenings, catching problems before symptoms set in. Early on, I skipped out on one of these tests and caught flak from my supervisor, who explained just how long mercury can sit in a person’s organs before showing any sign.
Nobody enjoys the hassle of strict safety rules, but they save lives. Investing in training, equipment, and a safety-first mindset means longer careers with less risk. That holds true for the home chemist as much as for professionals in industry or academia. The risks tied to mercurous oxide don’t give second chances, and handling it with respect earns peace of mind in return.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Dimercury oxygen |
| Other names |
Mercury(I) oxide Mercurous monoxide Dimeric mercury oxide |
| Pronunciation | /ˈmɜːr.kjʊ.rəs ˈɑːk.saɪd/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 131-89-5 |
| Beilstein Reference | 3598983 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:30413 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1201882 |
| ChemSpider | 14128 |
| DrugBank | DB11070 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 25467014 |
| EC Number | 231-846-0 |
| Gmelin Reference | 82115 |
| KEGG | C18258 |
| MeSH | D008613 |
| PubChem CID | 16211273 |
| RTECS number | OY3850000 |
| UNII | 9U7D1K7ZKE |
| UN number | UN2015 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID7034351 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | Hg2O |
| Molar mass | 432.18 g/mol |
| Appearance | Red powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 7.2 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | insoluble |
| log P | -15.55 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | −20.6 × 10⁻⁶ cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.94 |
| Dipole moment | 0.00 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 91.8 J⋅mol⁻¹⋅K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -90.8 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -241.8 kJ/mol |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | D08AP02 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | Toxic by inhalation, ingestion, and skin absorption; may cause irritation to skin, eyes, and respiratory tract. |
| GHS labelling | GHS02, GHS06, GHS08 |
| Pictograms | GHS06,GHS08 |
| Signal word | Danger |
| Hazard statements | May be fatal if swallowed; causes damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure; very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects |
| Precautionary statements | P201, P220, P260, P264, P273, P280, P308+P313, P314, P391, P405, P501 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-2-2-OX |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 oral rat 1000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): Oral rat LD50: 210 mg/kg |
| NIOSH | MW4550000 |
| PEL (Permissible) | PEL (Permissible Exposure Limit) for Mercurous Oxide: "0.1 mg/m³ (as Hg) |
| REL (Recommended) | 0.1 mg/m³ |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | IDLH: 10 mg/m³ |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Mercury(II) oxide Mercury(I) chloride Mercury(II) chloride Mercurous nitrate Mercury(II) sulfide |