Before digital records, chemists developed Mercuric Sodium Thiosalicylate through curiosity and direct experimentation in the early 20th century. Mercury compounds always caught plenty of attention because of their dramatic effects and broad application in medicine, chemistry, and industry, despite looming toxicity. The thiosalicylate group, itself a product of relentless research into organic acids and their metal complexes, paired up with mercury in labs looking for new antiseptics and analytical reagents. The first mentions and more rigorous descriptions of this compound showed up in chemical bulletins and pharmaceutical references before World War II, when researchers often prioritized results over thorough records. Chemists scoured the properties of this compound, aiming to balance the reactivity of mercury with the stabilizing effects of thiosalicylate, yielding a substance not only useful in lab reagents but promising in therapy and analytical chemistry.
Anyone who’s handled Mercuric Sodium Thiosalicylate knows its reputation swings between useful and hazardous. It's a salt formed from the reaction of mercuric ions and sodium thiosalicylate. Unlike some other mercury compounds, this one dissolves in water and ethanol, which makes it easier to use in laboratory settings and certain chemical syntheses. Its popularity in analytical chemistry comes from its ability to form clear, stable complexes that can be used to detect the presence of specific ions. Across the decades, specialty chemical suppliers listed this compound for tasks ranging from organic synthesis to specialized staining and titration procedures. In my own experience running through old catalogs, entries for this compound appeared with stern warnings, standing side by side with instructions for advanced users—never for the casual tinkerer.
What stands out most about Mercuric Sodium Thiosalicylate is its pale yellow, crystalline appearance. Its solubility in water allows it to blend quickly in solution, but the presence of mercury as the central atom adds a dense, heavy quality to its crystals. The compound’s molecular formula, C7H4HgNaO2S2, signals a combination of organic and inorganic chemistry at play. Odor stays faintly medicinal; one whiff can bring back memories of old medical supply rooms. It melts before decomposing, usually well below the temperatures expected from more stable compounds, which limits its use at high heats. Chemically, it falls apart under strong acids or bases, and oxidizing agents break down the thiosalicylate group rapidly. From a chemical standpoint, that means stability isn't its strong suit—this compound needs careful storage in dry, cool, slightly basic conditions, or it goes bad fast.
Professional suppliers print clear technical data on shipment containers in bold, no-nonsense language. Purity requirements—often exceeding 97% for research purposes—sit alongside batch numbers and storage instructions. Labels demand attention because the dangers are immediate: skull-and-crossbones pictograms, hazard warnings about skin and eye contact, and strict instructions for protective gear. Transport regulations walk a fine line between flexibility for scientific work and rigid protection for public health. Every bottle or container gets shipped under tight regulation, and every invoice includes detailed MSDS information. Laboratories tracking mercury inventories have to log every gram, and disposal instructions require pre-approval, whether on paper or through digital reporting systems. This layer of recordkeeping aims to protect workers, prevent theft or loss, and comply with rigorous international chemical safety standards.
Most syntheses start with salicylic acid, treating it with thionyl chloride to produce thiosalicylic acid, which then reacts with sodium hydroxide to yield sodium thiosalicylate. Into this solution, chemists introduce a measured amount of mercuric chloride or mercuric nitrate while stirring under a fume hood, allowing the color to shift and fine crystals to slowly drop from solution. Yields, never perfect, depend on the careful balancing of reagents and strict control of temperature. Anyone who’s tried this synthesis knows how easily things can veer astray; impurities slip in, unwanted colors appear, and crystalline structure suffers from the slightest deviation in temperature. Filtration and washing follow, usually with cold, distilled water, before drying under vacuum or over a desiccant. Quality control remains unforgiving—chemical purity checks become a matter of safety as much as scientific rigor.
Mercuric Sodium Thiosalicylate reacts with a range of reagents. Strong acids tend to break it apart, releasing mercury ions and liberating unpleasant gases. It forms new complexes with other heavy metals, sometimes swapping out the sodium or even bridging into larger, multinuclear assemblies. Under UV light, the thiosalicylate ring sometimes rearranges, generating byproducts usually considered waste but sometimes explored for unique photochemical behaviors. In the realm of modifications, esterification of the carboxyl group or tweaking the sulfur atom’s environment changes how the compound dissolves and interacts with light. Real-world chemists tune these features for analytical protocols, trying to draw out sharper, specific responses in either detection or reaction speed. What makes this compound special lies in its adaptability: chemists have documented a raft of chemical tweaks, each tailored for unique uses and each opening up new questions about mercury’s coordination chemistry.
Many catalogs list Mercuric Sodium Thiosalicylate under alternate names: Mercury(II) thiosalicylate sodium salt; Sodium mercuric thiosalicylate; Sodium o-mercaptobenzoate mercury; and a handful of proprietary designations, depending on region or manufacturer. Some trade publications just refer to it as NSMT, a handy shorthand for laboratory logs. The different names reflect changes in nomenclature standards over the decades, a kind of chemical fossil record embedded in textbooks and catalogs. The take-home lesson is always the same—check the actual chemical structure on the label, not just the name, to avoid confusion and potential mistakes in the lab or in regulatory filings.
Handling Mercuric Sodium Thiosalicylate means taking safety seriously, because mercury doesn’t forgive carelessness. Laboratory workers must wear sealed gloves, protective coats, and face shields. Fume hoods remain the venue for almost any procedure involving this compound. Training never stops: new students learn hazardous waste protocols through hands-on drills, and regular audits weed out unsafe shortcuts. Storage happens in secure cabinets equipped with spill trays, far from sources of heat or acids. Accidents, though rare, quickly shut down a lab while hazardous material teams clean up and investigate. Disposal costs add up, with each gram of waste tracked and shipped to certified mercury reclamation facilities, where every step gets documented. Nobody who handles this material forgets the constant vigilance it demands—the stories of acute exposure, sometimes from tiny spills, echo in staff meetings and training sessions for good reason.
Chemists put Mercuric Sodium Thiosalicylate to work in a tightly defined set of roles. Analytical chemistry labs use it to test for trace metals by forming colored complexes that signal the presence of specific ions. Histology technicians sometimes rely on it as a specialized stain, taking advantage of its affinity for certain tissue components in old-school microscopy. Some industrial processes draw on its ability to trap sulfide ions or mediate redox reactions, but regulatory scrutiny keeps that use in check. Drug development in the early- to mid-20th century explored its use in topical medications, although the toxicology reports and swift onset of side effects closed that chapter. One of the quirks of its history: spotting it in patent literature, often as a side note in complex synthesis or purification procedures where researchers harness the unique behavior of mercury-thiosalicylate complexes. Today, use stays tightly bound to experienced professionals with the right facilities and oversight.
Scientific journals still feature new research focusing on the fundamental chemistry of Mercuric Sodium Thiosalicylate. Academics and industrial scientists alike look at better detection methods for trace mercury pollution in water and soil using spectrometric techniques built around this compound’s spectral properties. Cutting-edge papers explore the impact of subtle modifications to the thiosalicylate ring, seeking more selective reagents to track mercury in biological samples, waste streams, and old mine sites. Some researchers pull this compound into the hunt for antimicrobial agents, though regulatory and safety hurdles remain overwhelming. A few interdisciplinary projects even analyze the electronic structure of this salt with advanced computational models, searching for theoretical avenues to mimic its reactivity without bringing mercury to the bench. Teams chase the idea of greener alternatives, and the constant thread of curiosity stretches through every new paper—scientists remain attracted by the mix of reactivity, unpredictability, and legacy concerns in mercury-based chemistry.
Mercury’s dark reputation rests on decades of documented harm, and Mercuric Sodium Thiosalicylate sits firmly in that lineage. Toxicology research since the 1940s catalogued health risks from both acute and chronic exposure—damage to kidneys, nervous system, and immune response took center stage. Animal testing, as distasteful as it reads now, laid the groundwork for setting strict occupational and environmental exposure limits. Reports from poison control centers and hospital records reinforce the message: rapid absorption through the skin or accidental inhalation leads to systemic mercury poisoning. Newer research examines the fate of the compound in natural water or soils, mapping how it persists, breaks down, or gets absorbed by living organisms. Comparing fieldwork to old laboratory data shows just how persistent low-level mercury contamination remains, complicating any argument for broad industrial use. Regulatory agencies depend on these findings for standards, and chemists know one misstep in handling erases months of careful, clean work.
Mercuric Sodium Thiosalicylate faces a crossroads between continued use in specialized research and the mounting pressure to retire mercury compounds from all but the most necessary applications. Alternative materials—ferric salts, organic agents, and engineered nanoparticles—compete for the same analytical and staining roles, often delivering similar performance without the toxic baggage. Environmental regulations grow tighter every few years, convincing even the most stubborn holdouts to limit their use of mercury reagents. At the same time, nobody ignores the hard-earned knowledge gained from studying compounds like this one: its legacy informs the search for safer, smarter reagents and keeps risk front and center in laboratory education. Cleanup crews, regulators, and research chemists now share the same goal—find ways to keep the science moving forward while closing the door on the environmental legacy of mercury salts. If the story of Mercuric Sodium Thiosalicylate teaches anything, it’s the enduring importance of caution, documentation, and a willingness to adapt when scientific understanding points toward new, safer directions.
Mercuric sodium thiosalicylate sounds like a mouthful. I remember the first time I came across this chemical in a lab safety manual—I did a double take. It carries mercury, a heavy metal with a long history of causing trouble in medicine and manufacturing.
Most people run into this compound in specialized labs or industrial settings, not at home. It once played a bigger role in medical products, mainly as a preservative and antifungal agent. For decades, manufacturers added this compound, and others like thimerosal, to vaccines and some pharmaceuticals to prevent bacterial contamination. It delivered consistent results: killing microbes, stopping the growth of unwanted fungi, and keeping medical supplies safe on the shelf.
Backing up, mercury isn’t something you want hanging around in your body. Researchers started noticing side effects. Scientific journals published evidence showing links between mercury-containing preservatives and allergies, skin reactions, and in rare cases, nervous system damage. The FDA and health agencies across the world didn’t take risks; they called for replacements or tighter controls, especially in products given to infants and pregnant women. In practice, most of those uses disappeared. The media caught onto this, fueling heated debates about safety and responsibility. Anyone working with or prescribing products with this chemical now faces clear rules and has to use extreme caution.
Healthcare shifted. Most medicines and vaccines now use different preservatives. That said, mercury compounds haven’t vanished. Mercuric sodium thiosalicylate can still show up in industrial chemistry as a reagent or catalyst, and sometimes in research labs for specialized testing or synthesis. Academic research still tests it when analyzing mercury’s effects or when calibrating equipment that detects trace metals. Some industrial labs lean on it for quality control of finished materials.
Mercury releases don’t just hurt people. Waterways and wildlife bear the brunt too. National Geographic and EPA studies underline how mercury builds up in food chains, winding up in fish and on our plates. Even minuscule spills in labs trigger expensive cleanups and strict reporting rules. I learned this the hard way after dropping a tiny vial in college—our whole chemistry department practically shut down until we decontaminated everything. Rules make sense. The fewer opportunities for exposure, the smaller the risk to our bodies and the broader environment.
Researchers and regulators agree: phase out mercury wherever possible. Manufacturers now pivot to alternatives like phenol or alcohol-based preservatives. The World Health Organization, CDC, and European Medicines Agency all recommend strict limits and regular reviews. On the industrial side, engineers push for closed systems and real-time monitoring to catch leaks before they spread contamination. Better education, rigorous material tracking, and retraining for chemical handlers make workplaces safer. Anyone working in labs or with chemicals at scale needs access to clear protocols and up-to-date safety gear. These steps cut down on accidents, keep workers healthy, and lower the odds of community exposure.
Mercuric sodium thiosalicylate serves as a reminder of science's double-edged sword: big benefits and big risks. That lesson sticks, whether you're in a factory, research lab, or reading labels at the pharmacy.
Stepping into a lab, you catch that telltale metallic smell and know you’re working with something serious. Mercuric sodium thiosalicylate, a compound blending mercury with a thiosalicylate salt, has been used in a variety of industrial and medical applications, but most people never get close to it. Those of us in chemistry or toxicology have seen both fascination and dread grow around this chemical. It pays to look past its usefulness and pay close attention to the downsides, especially the impact on human health.
Mercury itself has always caused headaches for health pros, and mixing it with thiosalicylate doesn’t soften the blow. People exposed to mercuric compounds often complain about skin irritation. The rash is often itchy with red, inflamed patches. Sometimes, welts appear that refuse to heal quickly, showing that the skin, our first barrier, gets hit hard.
The inhalation route, especially in poorly ventilated spaces, causes the most anxiety. Workers develop persistent coughs, tightness in the chest, and a metallic taste in the mouth. I remember seeing a colleague struggle with splitting headaches and blurry vision after spending too long near an open container. Later, he told me sleep felt impossible for a week.
Most people don’t realize mercury’s real damage appears over time. Repeated skin contact or inhalation chips away at your health. Studies, including a review in the Journal of Occupational Medicine, show cumulative mercury exposure leads to tremors and problems with memory and mood. It’s not rare to hear about workers losing their fine motor control. In severe cases, people slur their words or seem confused—signs that the nervous system can’t keep up anymore.
Mercury compounds damage the kidneys. Blood protein levels rise as the filtering process falters. Pain in the lower back often goes ignored until blood tests force the issue. For some, autoimmune issues flare up, with the body mistaking its own cells as enemies. These effects don’t vanish once exposure stops.
A solution begins with respect. Nobody walks into a hazardous materials lab thinking minor precautions will do. Gloves, fume hoods, and regular air quality checks make a huge difference. I’ve seen labs cut exposure reports in half just by adopting closed systems and giving staff real break time away from their workstations.
There’s also a public role for regulators. OSHA and the CDC set exposure limits, but enforcement relies on honesty. I’ve witnessed supervisors fudge reports—pressure to meet quotas sometimes outweighs safety. It takes commitment from individuals on the floor to insist on regular screenings and immediate reporting of symptoms.
For those dealing with exposure, medical detox protocols exist, though outcomes vary. Chelation agents pull mercury from the bloodstream, but these aren't magic erasers. A doctor once told me, “You can pull someone from a burning building, but you can’t erase the scars.” Protection, not cure, should always be the target.
Every time someone skips a glove or rushes a procedure, risk goes up. Families bear the cost, as chronic illnesses drain energy from home life. The science couldn’t be clearer—mercury doesn’t forgive mistakes. Keeping people safe starts with education, honest oversight, and a culture where safety beats speed. I’ve lost good friends to jobs that didn’t prioritize this balance, so I never downplay these warnings. The real side effect of mercuric sodium thiosalicylate is the price you pay for shortcuts.
Mercuric sodium thiosalicylate once held a spot in some medical and industrial products. It combines mercury with components known for their antiseptic and preservative qualities. People may recognize its cousin, thimerosal, used for years as a vaccine preservative. For decades, compounds like these brought debate around their pros and cons.
You don’t have to be a scientist to know that mercury attracts warnings. The element is notorious for its toxic impact on organs like the brain and kidneys. The form inside mercuric sodium thiosalicylate is an organic mercury compound—different from the harsh metallic mercury in old thermometers, but risks stick around. Research shows organic mercury soaks easily into the body. It doesn’t just leave quickly, either. It likes to settle in organs, building up slowly with repeated exposure.
Children, infants, and pregnant women draw extra focus any time mercury fills a medical role. The FDA, CDC, and World Health Organization agree: mercury exposure in early life can harm brain development. In my own family, stories passed down include tales of “mad hatter” symptoms from old mercury-laced products, from tremors to memory lapses.
A closer look at history shows this compound turning up in antiseptics, topical preparations, and as a preservative. The reason chemicals like mercuric sodium thiosalicylate appeared so often? They kept batches free from bacteria or fungus. Early in the vaccine era, preventing contamination was a triumph. The rise of safer, non-mercury preservatives changed the landscape.
After concerns about mercury’s accumulative effects, many places retired these ingredients from vaccines and consumer healthcare items. Europe and the United States shifted away from using thimerosal and related substances in childhood vaccines starting around 2001. Investigations since then, including large-scale reviews and public health studies, spotlight the benefit of shifting to less risky preservatives.
National health agencies hold tough standards for chemical safety. In the United States, the FDA tracks medical products for any evidence of adverse effects. It’s not only about what goes into vaccines or medications today, but also what lingers in supplies or older products elsewhere. Several regulatory bodies now recommend minimizing exposure to mercury where possible, especially in children and during pregnancy.
I once visited an old medical supply room and watched the staff pull dusty bottles from a shelf. They spent time reviewing labels for any sign of mercury-containing ingredients, disposing of anything questionable through special hazardous waste channels. Hospitals practice this routinely. It’s a step that shows institutions treat the presence of these compounds seriously.
Safer options exist. Pharmaceutical labs now have access to preservatives without mercury. Ethylmercury—the variety found in compounds like mercuric sodium thiosalicylate—leaves the body faster than methylmercury from fish, but health voices say: aim lower, not higher. Preventing exposure forms the core of public health wisdom.
Reading labels and being careful about buying or using vintage medical supplies matters, especially for families, schools, and clinics. Individuals should turn to pharmacists or local health agencies with questions about a product’s contents. No single preservative remains perfect, but experience shows mercury-based choices don’t belong in daily use anymore.
Mercuric Sodium Thiosalicylate shows up in research labs, sometimes in niche industrial settings. It carries risk because of its mercury content. Mercury doesn’t play nice with living things; it can do harm with very little exposure. Getting careless with the storage of this compound runs the risk of leaks, spills, and health hazards for both people and the environment. Having worked in a busy university lab, I’ve seen how overlooked substances can cause big, immediate problems. A cracked bottle or an unlabeled cabinet turns into panic mode in seconds, especially with anything mercury-based.
Mercuric Sodium Thiosalicylate calls for a cool, dry space, away from direct sunlight. Heat and humidity often increase how quickly chemicals degrade or react, and with mercury compounds, those odds aren’t worth testing. Fluctuating temperatures lead to container damage or chemical instability. A climate-controlled room, set at around 20°C (68°F), keeps things predictably safe. Humidity levels below 60% help as well. Sunlight can break down some chemicals and mess with labeling; old, faded labels lead to mix-ups. Knowing what’s in each container matters more than it seems, especially in emergencies.
A responsible lab keeps mercury compounds in locked cabinets, set aside from acids, oxidizers, and organics. Storing incompatible chemicals together leads to massive risks during accidental leaks or fires. A dedicated locker built out of metal or treated wood can keep things contained in case of spills. Strong labeling saves time: use large type, color coding, and chemical hazard symbols to avoid confusion. From personal experience, clear labeling makes all the difference during a chaotic day or an inspection. People don’t double-check a manifest when a bottle cracks—they act on instinct.
Glass containers with tight, chemical-resistant lids work best for Mercuric Sodium Thiosalicylate. Plastic can break down over time or let fumes out. Each container needs a date and source, along with a quick reference number tied to an inventory log. During transfers, nitrile gloves, face shields, and lab coats provide basic protection. A small splash can mean a trip to the doctor; one careless move can shut down a whole wing of a building. Safety gear gets used far more often than anyone expects, especially with tricky mercury compounds.
Spills happen, no matter how careful people are. An emergency kit should sit near the storage area: mercury spill powder, absorbent pads, and a bottle of sodium thiosulfate or a comparable neutralizing agent. Local environmental rules make a difference here—hazardous waste labels and a logbook simplify the process. I’ve seen a whole lab held up for days while a minor spill got sorted out. Calling a professional hazardous waste service feels expensive, but the cost of an uncontained spill runs much higher.
Mercuric Sodium Thiosalicylate shows why every chemical deserves respect. Overconfidence leads to shortcuts, and shortcuts often end in trouble. Thoughtful storage, clear labeling, and following safety rules matter every single day. Those steps keep people safe, keep labs open, and keep regulators off your back. Staying careful with mercury compounds never feels optional if you’ve seen what happens when it goes wrong.
I’ve seen people underestimate what a compound can do. Mercuric sodium thiosalicylate rarely shows up in basic chemistry sets—there’s a reason for that. It contains mercury. Most folks know mercury has a toxic legacy. This isn’t just talk from people who read too many warning labels. Inhaling, swallowing, or touching compounds with mercury causes real harm to the nervous system, kidneys, and other organs. The stuff can go through the skin, build up in your body, and mess with brain function. Medical journals report that chronic exposure leads to memory loss, tremors, and even mood shifts. Sometimes folks forget protection until those symptoms sneak up over weeks or months.
Gloves and goggles sound basic, but they block the main ways this salt invades your system. Good latex or nitrile gloves keep skin from soaking up mercury. Safety goggles defend your eyes from splashes. Working inside a fume hood gives you a fighting chance against vapors and dust—you don’t always smell the trouble until it’s inside your lungs. People in research labs lean on these tools every day. They don’t gamble with their health, since it takes one slip to pay the price.
In shared spaces, mistakes often happen because labels get ignored or erased. I’ve watched a student rush because he mistook a silvery-white compound for something harmless. Spelling out “MERCURY – DANGER” in bold lettering on every bottle and secondary container takes guesswork off the table. Hazard symbols work faster than words when time matters. Mixing up containers by accident could end up with spills or worse, a chemical reaction that nobody wanted.
Mercuric sodium thiosalicylate needs its own place in the waste stream. Pouring it down the drain or tossing it in regular trash spreads contamination fast. Municipal water systems cannot handle high-mercury waste safely, and there’s a record of heavy fines for labs that cut corners. Some schools invest in strict chemical waste programs for this reason. Specialized collection bins stay locked and get handled by licensed disposal services. Every once in a while, someone tries the “dilution” game. Regulators have slammed penalties for that approach and communities pay the environmental cost.
Even careful people drop things. Spills involving mercury compounds stand out: they spread, vaporize, and linger. Having a spill kit—complete with mercury-absorbing powder, disposable towels, and sealable bags—saves a lot of panic. Lab veterans teach new techs to evacuate unnecessary personnel and clean up with care. No confusion about protocol helps lower the risk of exposure. Documenting the cleanup with logs also keeps teams honest. Nobody wants to realize months later that a toxic residue still hides under a bench.
Training shouldn’t stop with a quick orientation. People who handle chemicals like mercuric sodium thiosalicylate benefit from regular updates. Regulations change, new equipment shows up, and close calls reveal gaps in what people remember. I’ve watched teams add short safety quizzes at staff meetings. They track mistakes as opportunities to learn, not assign blame. Keeping people informed builds trust, both with regulators and within the lab. The best safety records usually belong to the places that commit to learning, not just compliance.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Sodium 2-[(mercurysulfanyl)carbonyloxy]benzoate |
| Other names |
Mercury sodium thiosalicylate Sodium ethylmercurithiosalicylate Thiomersal Thimerosal |
| Pronunciation | /ˌmɜːrˈkjʊrɪk ˈsoʊdiəm ˌθaɪoʊsəˈlɪsɪleɪt/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | [395-54-0] |
| Beilstein Reference | 90810 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:34916 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL2104890 |
| ChemSpider | 21567744 |
| DrugBank | DB06778 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03a00f884eb4-46f7-994e-09782c6397be |
| EC Number | 612-698-8 |
| Gmelin Reference | Gm. 2621 |
| KEGG | C18737 |
| MeSH | D013623 |
| PubChem CID | 20569591 |
| RTECS number | OJ8225000 |
| UNII | Q51W3O9627 |
| UN number | UN2020 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID20164 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C8H5HgNaO2S |
| Molar mass | 437.77 g/mol |
| Appearance | White to yellowish powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 2.48 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Soluble |
| log P | 0.4 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Acidity (pKa) | 3.5 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -53.0e-6 cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.689 |
| Dipole moment | 3.88 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 309.7 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | M01CB02 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | May cause cancer. Causes damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure. Fatal if swallowed, inhaled or in contact with skin. Causes severe skin burns and eye damage. Very toxic to aquatic life. |
| GHS labelling | GHS02, GHS06, GHS08 |
| Pictograms | GHS06,GHS09 |
| Signal word | Danger |
| Hazard statements | H301 + H331: Toxic if swallowed or if inhaled. |
| Precautionary statements | P264, P270, P273, P280, P301+P312, P302+P352, P304+P340, P305+P351+P338, P308+P311, P330, P337+P313, P362+P364, P405, P501 |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 rat oral 75 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): 1600 mg/kg (oral, mouse) |
| NIOSH | WI9275000 |
| PEL (Permissible) | 0.1 mg/m3 as Hg |
| REL (Recommended) | Not established |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Unknown |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Thiomersal Merbromin Mercuric chloride Mercurous chloride Sodium thiosalicylate |