Wusu, Tacheng Prefecture, Xinjiang, China admin@sinochem-nanjing.com 3389378665@qq.com
Follow us:



Imidazo[1,2-B]Pyridazine: Past, Present, and What Comes Next

Historical Development

Imidazo[1,2-B]pyridazine didn’t emerge in a vacuum. For decades, scientists tried to crack the code on heterocyclic compounds that could bring fresh potential to medicine and materials science. Imidazo[1,2-B]pyridazine cropped up alongside a wave of nitrogen-rich ring systems back in the latter half of the twentieth century, as researchers noticed the biological activity hiding in fused pyridazine cores. This wasn’t just academic curiosity—real diseases called for new answers, and industries sought materials that last longer under strain. The urge to invent or improve drove teams across Europe, North America, and Asia to tinker with ring structures, tweak substituents, and refine conditions in fume hoods. Through years of publishing, patenting, and quite honestly, a lot of failed syntheses, what we now call imidazo[1,2-B]pyridazine took shape. The literature soon filled up with reports showing what this backbone could do, and suddenly, organic chemists had a new toolkit for anti-viral, anti-cancer, and high-performance materials.

Product Overview

In the laboratory or at scale, imidazo[1,2-B]pyridazine comes as a solid, usually pale or slightly yellow. Depending on the substitutions at strategic points on the core ring, you get a spectrum of melting points and solubilities, but the fundamental skeleton stays consistent: fused imidazole and pyridazine rings, three nitrogen atoms crammed into tight corners. Companies sell it under names that whisper at its structure—sometimes plain, other times dressed up with IUPAC rigor or pharma branding. You find it as raw powders in brown glass bottles, dissolved in solvents for quick reaction setups, or as part of a combi-chem stack meant for screening new bioactivity. The compound sits on the thin line between a staple of the research shelf and a springboard for custom molecular tweaks.

Physical & Chemical Properties

Imidazo[1,2-B]pyridazine stands out with a molecular weight that falls comfortably in the range for most lab synthesis and pharmaceutical interest, usually around 130-250 g/mol, depending on substituents. Its rigidity comes from those fused rings—a backbone that stays flat and strong under most heat and pressure, translating into decent thermal stability. You won’t see it dissolve in every solvent; polar organics like DMSO, DMF, and acetonitrile do the job, while water usually struggles unless the ring’s been tailored with polar groups. UV absorption peaks reflect its aromatic core, making it a favorite in analytical labs for easy detection by spectrophotometry. The core withstands moderate acids and bases, but strong nucleophiles and oxidants demand respect, sometimes knocking off sensitive groups or opening the ring.

Technical Specifications & Labeling

Technical data sheets give a snapshot of what buyers and researchers can expect. Purity typically comes at 97% or higher for research use, flagged by HPLC, NMR, or mass spectrometry. Safety sheets make it clear: keep the powder dry, sealed, and far from open flames. Labels in full compliance spell out hazard pictograms, batch numbers, and shelf lives. For storage, ambient temperature in a cool, dry place often suffices, though some analogs ask for refrigeration. Analytical certificates trace each lot, so anyone with doubts can confirm purity, absence of heavy metals, or residual solvent content down to the ppm. Every container tells the story of its origin, tracking from manufacturer to customer with precision demanded by good lab practices and regulatory watchdogs.

Preparation Method

Traditional routes to imidazo[1,2-B]pyridazine start with simple building blocks—2,3-diaminopyridazines couple with α-haloketones, or other electrophiles, under basic conditions. Heating under reflux in ethanol or DMF, sometimes catalyzed by metal salts, pushes the ring closure, with the imidazole forming as the nucleophilic amino group attacks carbonyl or halide centers. A range of methods have evolved, with microwave-assisted synthesis cutting down reaction times and raising yields. Protecting groups, purification steps, and chromatographic separations turn lab bench work into grams or even kilos in pilot plants. Green chemistry plays a bigger role these days, with solvent recycling and milder reagents gaining ground in factories as much as in academic settings. Know-how comes from years of failed experiments and incremental adjustments, because anyone can follow a recipe, but only experience turns stubborn intermediates into smooth production.

Chemical Reactions & Modifications

Chemists love to use imidazo[1,2-B]pyridazine as a platform for functionalization. The ring nitrogen atoms put up a fight against simple electrophiles, but with the right activation—diazotization, metal catalysts, or halogen substitutions—you can swap in groups at the 3, 6, or 8 positions. Suzuki and Heck couplings, Buchwald-Hartwig conditions, and even nucleophilic aromatic substitutions bring alkyl, aryl, or heterocyclic partners onto the core. You see modification cascades, once a favorite trick for patent jockeys looking for ways to extend intellectual property on promising leads. Medicinal chemists, inspired by new screening hits, pile on polar groups to boost solubility or tune pKa. Material scientists stretch the same core by adding electron donors and acceptors, rigging the molecule for use in OLEDs, sensors, or coordination polymers.

Synonyms & Product Names

Imidazo[1,2-B]pyridazine might appear under a dozen aliases depending on context. Common names float among catalogues: 6-azaindazole, imidazopyridazine, or by their CAS-registry numbers for legal or regulatory paperwork. More elaborate pharmaceuticals dress the structure in proprietary names, with prefixes and suffixes linking to intended diseases or parent companies. Organic chemists fall back on IUPAC conventions to communicate unambiguously across borders or when writing for journals. Online suppliers sometimes play loose with hyphens or capitalization, but the core ring stays clear—chemical diagrams or SMILES codes give away the true identity, no matter what appears on the bottle.

Safety & Operational Standards

Almost all work with imidazo[1,2-B]pyridazine demands gloves, goggles, and well-ventilated fume hoods. While most analogs don’t pose acute toxicity at small scale, chronic exposure and lack of long-term epidemiological data urge extra caution. Standard chemical handling protocols apply—spill kits ready, no food or drink near the lab bench, and secure sharps disposal. Waste must pass through certified incineration or specialized solvent recovery systems, since even trace contaminants risk mixing with wastewater streams. Regulatory agencies keep an eye on intermediates flagged for pharmaceutical or agricultural interest, and in-process controls now stretch into in-line analytics or barcoded batch tracking. Safety data sheets reflect up-to-date research, but real wisdom comes from the old hands—never cut corners, don’t trust clear liquids, and watch for surprises after workups. Only ongoing training and daily vigilance avoid disaster stories that end up as case studies for the next generation.

Application Area

Imidazo[1,2-B]pyridazine earns its keep in more labs than most folks realize. Drug companies chase its ability to act as kinase inhibitors, antitumor agents, or antivirals. A run through PubMed shows hundreds of studies tying this backbone to proteins that drive cancer or inflammation. In agriculture, researchers push derivatives as fungicides or growth modulators for crops hungry for efficiency. Electronic companies test these molecules as new semiconductors and sensors, harnessing electron flow properties tuned by careful substitution. Biologists, never shy about trying new scaffolds, tack on fluorescent tags and use derivatives for cell staining or probe design. Every field that needs selective binding, ruggedness, or unusual electronic effects likes to try this ring system and its variants; sometimes success comes from strange quarters—a screening library turns up an unexpected antibiotic, or a new material tolerates radiation that ruins the old standard.

Research & Development

Pharmaceutical companies pour millions into making imidazo[1,2-B]pyridazine derivatives with cleaner activity profiles, fewer side effects, and metabolism that favors dosing schedules patients can stick to. In my experience reading both academic and patent literature, you see a relentless push for better SAR (structure-activity relationship) insight, with teams testing dozens of analogs per week, collaborating with computational chemists to predict which derivatives may succeed. Funding agencies reward interdisciplinary teams who fuse synthetic expertise with biological acumen and data science. Beyond pharma, startup companies in organic electronics try to stretch the physical limits—testing thermal stability, charge mobility, and photostability for applications in OLEDs, lightweight batteries, or smart materials. The best work happens when groups share data openly, publish negative results, and stay transparent about what doesn’t work as well as the breakthrough stories they put in press releases.

Toxicity Research

Nobody trusts a compound with promise until toxicology catches up. Recent research covers acute and chronic exposures across mammalian cell lines, aquatic models, and soil organisms. Most simple imidazo[1,2-B]pyridazine analogs show low cytotoxicity at micromolar doses, but function-group heavy modifications, especially halogenation or nitro groups, call for stricter attention. Micronucleus and Ames tests probe for mutagenicity, while longer in vivo studies chase unknown metabolites. The challenge comes in predicting cross-reactivity—what looks safe in enzymes may not fare well in whole organisms. Regulatory oversight speeds up as more derivatives reach animal or even early human studies, with a premium on robust analytical methods that track even faint metabolic byproducts. The larger message: safety doesn’t get cleared by animal data alone. Ecological impacts, rare allergic reactions, and long-term exposure risks keep companies conservative when pushing new analogs forward.

Future Prospects

Imidazo[1,2-B]pyridazine, having gone from obscure synthesis to multipurpose tool, still rides a wave of discovery. AI tools help design new derivatives faster and more rationally than ever, picking combinations that a human might overlook. With more diseases calling for selective molecular recognition and materials science chasing lighter, tougher, smarter compounds, the need for new variants won’t run dry. I see promise in personalized medicine—imagine derivatives fine-tuned not just for one illness, but for a single patient’s metabolism. As analytical instrumentation gets more sensitive and computational modeling more precise, the time between “idea” and “potential product” shrinks by years. Industry and academia, sharing data and openly tackling failed leads, will find breakthroughs no one person could claim alone. The next big leap won’t just come from brighter scientists, but from smarter teamwork and ethical pathways to safe, accessible innovation.




What are the main applications of Imidazo[1,2-B]Pyridazine?

Spotlight on Drug Discovery

One look at the recent trends in pharmaceutical labs, and it’s clear that imidazo[1,2-b]pyridazine draws a lot of attention from researchers chasing new therapies. This molecule serves as a building block for all sorts of experimental agents, showing strong promise in fighting cancer. Teams looking for kinase inhibitors, for example, have turned to this skeleton because it interacts tightly with cellular pathways responsible for tumor growth. GlaxoSmithKline’s early work leveraged similar scaffolds to craft compounds with targeted activity.

In my own stint shadowing medicinal chemists, I saw first-hand how often this motif popped up in the design of small-molecule inhibitors. The real magic comes from the ability to fine-tune positions on the ring, adjusting how a drug candidate binds proteins or avoids being broken down too quickly in the body. People living with leukemia and other serious diagnoses count on this kind of innovation, which makes the fundamentals behind imidazo[1,2-b]pyridazine anything but academic.

Antimicrobial Agents and the Global Push

Hospitals battle infections daily. Resistance to standard antibiotics continues to climb, so researchers keep hunting for functional alternatives. Some of the new families of antimicrobial agents feature imidazo[1,2-b]pyridazine as a core ingredient. These compounds have shown real bite against bacteria and fungi in lab cultures, holding up even when tested against bugs known to shrug off older drugs.

Scientific papers from China and the US regularly highlight the antifungal and antibacterial activity tied to these chemicals. The push for safer hospital environments and effective treatments connects directly with this research. The infectious disease doctors I’ve spoken to don’t take chances—every time a new compound shows ability to block resistant organisms, it offers hope and a mandate to push further.

Neuroscience and Central Nervous System Research

Scientists hunting for treatments for Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s have also started testing out molecules derived from imidazo[1,2-b]pyridazine. There’s a long road from initial screening to an actual medicine, but early reports indicate these molecules affect critical targets in the brain. In university labs, students and postdocs rely on these building blocks when screening for agents that might curb inflammation or support dopamine levels.

Having met families grappling with neurological decline, it’s personal to see just how much power a chemical motif like this can deliver. Hunting for better outcomes means going molecule by molecule, shaping and reshaping until something clicks in living systems—not just on paper.

Further Applications and the Path Ahead

Beyond the clinic, imidazo[1,2-b]pyridazine-based compounds have found use in making new agrochemicals for crop protection. Food security depends on reliable pesticides, especially as climate shifts and new pests emerge. Chemists invest considerable effort into designing agents that target insects or weeds without building up toxic residues. Reports out of agricultural science groups point to these heterocycles as a source of both effectiveness and precisely directed activity.

Big progress rarely happens in isolation. The advancement of imidazo[1,2-b]pyridazine chemistry works because people cross-pollinate between disciplines: pharmaceutical sciences, microbiology, agriculture, and even environmental monitoring. Whether it’s the next generation of anti-cancer treatments or tools for safer farming, practical breakthroughs draw directly from this toolkit. If there’s one thing the history of drug and chemical discovery shows, it’s that a simple change in molecular structure can bring lasting impacts far beyond the lab.

What are the storage conditions for Imidazo[1,2-B]Pyridazine?

Understanding Imidazo1,2-BPyridazine

Imidazo1,2-BPyridazine isn’t a compound most people bump into at the pharmacy or even during undergraduate chemistry classes. Its structure gives it a special place in the lab, serving as a backbone in pharmaceutical research and various advanced material projects. A lot of effort and cost goes into its synthesis. Safe handling and smart storage practices protect that investment and make sure research stays on track.

Freshness Driven by Proper Storage

Every lab has tales about wasted compounds or ruined experiments from poor storage habits. With Imidazo1,2-BPyridazine, shelf life can be dramatically cut short if left exposed. It likes to break down in the presence of moisture and light. I’ve experienced firsthand the impact of humidity creeping into a jar, changing a once-crisp powder into a sticky mess unfit for any test tube. That lesson sticks with you.

Research literature and manufacturers agree on the core basics: seal Imidazo1,2-BPyridazine tightly. Keep it away from direct sunlight and fluorescence. A brown glass bottle, wrapped in foil, and tucked in a dry cupboard does the job. Store it at or below room temperature — usually between 15°C and 25°C — unless your supplier recommends colder storage. Silica gel packets inside the chemicals cabinet can soak up stray moisture, giving an added layer of insurance. These steps sound simple, but they often get skipped in busy labs, leading to wasted chemicals and lost time.

Why Get Serious About Safe Storage?

For research groups running on tight budgets, tossing out spoiled chemicals because of poor storage feels like lighting money on fire. More than cost, using degraded Imidazo1,2-BPyridazine means results can swing wildly, experiments repeat, projects grind slower. Researchers in medicinal chemistry rely on consistent purity that only comes from careful storage.

The health angle matters as well. Degraded organic chemicals sometimes throw off unpredictable byproducts. Breathing dust or vapors from compromised chemicals isn’t safe. Every established lab keeps strict logs on open dates and condition checks. My own group developed a habit of labeling opening and expiration dates right on each bottle. On busy days, that reduces mistakes more than any fancy tracking software ever could.

Room for Better Habits

No two labs have identical storage setups. Some rely on climate-controlled rooms, others on basic desiccators, and some on deep-freeze fridges. The main thing: everyone working with Imidazo1,2-BPyridazine has to know why these routines exist. Clear training for new team members, regular refresher tips, and honest conversations about what’s slipping make a difference. I’ve sat through lab meetings where someone admits to leaving the chemical out on the bench and we all recalibrate, remembering why the small steps add up to safer, more reliable science.

Manufacturers or suppliers should be transparent about best storage practices. Researchers benefit from a quick call or email if label information feels light. If you ever inherit a bottle lacking clear information, reach out for storage guidance before risking your samples. It’s an easy habit to build, and it keeps labs safer, results cleaner, and budgets healthier.

Taking Storage Seriously: A Path Forward

Smart storage of Imidazo1,2-BPyridazine pays off for everyone. Whether you’re the veteran chemist or the student prepping their first synthesis, simple habits — sealing, shielding, controlling temperature, tracking dates — make a huge impact. Chemical integrity starts at the shelf, long before a reaction flask heats up.

Is Imidazo[1,2-B]Pyridazine hazardous or toxic?

Real Risks Behind a Laboratory Name

Imidazo[1,2-b]pyridazine doesn’t ring a bell for most people outside chemistry circles. It’s a heterocyclic compound, catching the eye of drug developers, agrochemical researchers, and materials scientists for its unique structure. Not much pops up in mainstream news about it, but those who handle these compounds in labs know questions about its safety are worth asking — not just for scientists but for workers in manufacturing and communities near production facilities.

Human Health and Environmental Concerns

You will not find imidazo[1,2-b]pyridazine on lists of household chemicals, but its presence in research labs signals a need for clear information about hazards. Some variants in this family can be part of drug candidates, which means early toxicity assessments are a must. No regulatory agencies like OSHA or ECHA have published a full breakdown on this specific backbone, but similar nitrogen-containing ring systems sometimes raise red flags for mutagenicity and chronic toxicity.

Accidental skin contact or inhalation of finely milled compounds can carry real risks, especially when there isn’t enough toxicity data publicized. My own time on research benches taught me that even obscure molecules have to go through safety data sheets (SDS). For many newer compounds, those sheets come with more “Not known” fields than answers. That’s not comforting for workers who aren’t researchers and may be mixing or packing these chemicals in bulk. Drug discovery teams often rely on animal studies or computer modelling to predict cancer risk, reproductive toxicity, and organ damage — all of these results should drive the rules for industrial handling.

Gaps in Current Information

If there’s no clear data, the safest route is treating the substance as hazardous until proven otherwise. Some academic papers exist on toxicology for similar fused heterocycles. Studies show that some compounds in this category bind DNA tightly, which is usually a red flag for mutagenicity. Not all imidazo[1,2-b]pyridazines behave the same way, so drawing broad conclusions often leads to mistakes. Without long-term studies, the real health impact remains unknown. This situation is common for “intermediate” molecules — building blocks not meant for end use but for further transformation in the lab. Still, exposure can happen.

What Accountability Looks Like

Lab managers and chemical manufacturers should back up every shipment with strong, honest hazard reports. The push shouldn’t just come from regulators; research teams and businesses benefit from protecting their people and the public. Industry groups and research councils could help fill information gaps by funding more testing and making the results open-access. Companies in the field can sign on to responsible care agreements, not waiting for new laws to slowly catch up.

Better tools exist now for screening chemical toxicity — like computational models, in-vitro screening, and wearable exposure monitors — and these keep workers much safer when combined with classic lab protocols. For people involved in transport or disposal, comprehensive labels and clear training cut down on unplanned exposures.

Until science fills in the blanks, caution and communication give everyone a real shield against unexpected harm. None of this means stopping progress; it means matching it with responsibility.

What is the chemical structure and formula of Imidazo[1,2-B]Pyridazine?

A Look at the Backbone of Imidazo[1,2-B]Pyridazine

There’s a real beauty to the world of heterocyclic chemistry. Take imidazo[1,2-b]pyridazine, for example. The name alone hints at a structure that merges two celebrated heterocycles: imidazole and pyridazine. Sitting down with a pencil and notepad back in college, I always found these fused systems a bit of a puzzle. Piecing together the rings felt rewarding, and that experience never left me. So let’s pick apart this structure, ring by ring, and see what defines it.

Breaking Down the Rings

Start by picturing imidazole—a five-membered ring with two nitrogens at positions 1 and 3. Now, imagine fusing this to a six-membered ring, pyridazine, which has its own two nitrogens sitting at positions 1 and 2. For imidazo[1,2-b]pyridazine, the key lies in how these rings connect. The “[1,2-b]” tells us the two compounds share neighboring carbon atoms, forming a fused bicyclic system. Chemists love using systematic names because they clear up confusion about where the nitrogens land and how the rings overlap. To those of us who’ve sketched countless aromatic systems in a lab notebook, this fusion makes sense almost intuitively.

Here’s the chemical formula: C6H4N4. Each atom in that formula tells a story about the shape and reactivity of the molecule. The structure features a bicyclic aromatic system, with four nitrogen atoms woven into the framework.

Why the Structure Matters

Just looking at imidazo[1,2-b]pyridazine on paper, some folks might wonder what all the fuss is about. But let me tell you, this isn’t just a curiosity. In medicinal chemistry circles, compounds like these turn heads because they hold promise for new drugs, from antivirals to anticancer agents. The electron-rich nitrogens offer up hydrogen bonding and unique shapes, which drug designers use to better fit tricky protein targets. That sort of versatility fuels discovery, and it starts right here at the level of raw chemical structure.

Sometimes, folks get surprised by how much chemistry shapes the medicines in their cabinet—or the dyes and electronics in their home. Turns out, even a single nitrogen placed just so in a ring can push a molecule across the line from “boring” to “bioactive.” There’s no magic here, just the basic toolkit of organic chemistry that’s been refined over generations.

Challenges and Solutions in Working with Imidazo[1,2-B]Pyridazine

One sticking point in research involves making these fused rings in the lab. You don’t find imidazo[1,2-b]pyridazine lying around in nature. Most synthesis routes use cyclization reactions—joining simpler precursors under the right conditions. Sometimes the challenge is purity; sometimes it’s scale. My own experience in a grad lab meant grappling with stubborn reaction mixtures and unpredictable yields.

Researchers have been getting more creative with microwave-assisted synthesis or using transition metal catalysts to push these reactions further. That’s not just academic: faster, cleaner reactions mean more efficient discovery for pharma and material science. If we put open sharing and method development at the forefront, more labs can unlock the potential of this core.

So What’s at Stake?

Imidazo[1,2-b]pyridazine may be a mouthful, but it’s more than a chemical curiosity. From the heart of its bicyclic core, this structure shapes real-world impact in modern drug development and advanced materials. Getting to grips with these chemical frameworks takes more than a passing glance—it means rolling up your sleeves and sketching out those rings, one atom at a time.

Are there any known analogs or derivatives of Imidazo[1,2-B]Pyridazine available?

The Role of Imidazo[1,2-B]Pyridazine in Medicinal Chemistry

Imidazo[1,2-b]pyridazine serves as more than a tongue-twister for chemists. Behind this technical name sits a core chemical structure that's caught the attention of medicinal researchers across the globe. The structure offers a foundation for building molecules that can push the frontiers of drug development.

Pharmaceutical scientists often build on this scaffold. You’ll find derivatives in preclinical studies for oncology, inflammation, and even infectious disease research. Some of these analogs have improved solubility, better selectivity, or reduced toxicity. Those tweaks often open new doors in drug discovery.

Published Analogs and Their Uses

Scientific literature and patent filings show a steady stream of modified imidazo[1,2-b]pyridazine compounds. Chemists change up the rings, swap out side chains, and add functional groups. These modifications shape properties ranging from how the molecules bind to a biological target, to how long they stick around in the human body. A researcher sees an activity profile and imagines, "What if I move that methyl group? What if I add a halogen?"

Recent patents highlight kinase inhibitors where imidazo[1,2-b]pyridazine forms the backbone. Cancer research has brought forward several candidates, with some showing potent activity against specific molecular targets. One example: Pfizer and Novartis have both explored variants as kinase inhibitors for oncology.

Take inflammation studies as another direction. Researchers rework the base scaffold to build inhibitors tailored for overactive immune responses. Many compounds stay in academic literature, but a few make their way to industrial partnerships for further screening.

Availability and Market Trends

Trying to get your hands on these compounds rarely feels straightforward. Most derivatives don’t end up on every chemical supplier’s shelf. Instead, research chemicals services like ChemDiv, Enamine, or MolPort serve a niche demand from academic groups and biotech startups. A look through catalogs or supplier websites gives listings for a handful of imidazo[1,2-b]pyridazine analogs—sometimes with short descriptions about pharmacological screening or assay use.

Custom synthesis fills the gap. Many labs request tailored analogs, sending in specific requirements to contract chemistry shops. These businesses bridge the gulf between an idea and a vial of compound for testing. Time and budget both play into this, making planning ahead key for a project’s success.

Challenges and Future Solutions

Not every researcher has access to a skilled synthetic chemist or high-throughput screening setup. Cost and lead time slow progress. Grant funding might fall short of covering enough analogs for a useful structure-activity relationship map. The field benefits from open science platforms where scientists share data about new derivatives—what works, what flops, and what shows early promise.

Another fix comes from automated synthesis tools and AI-driven molecule design. Instead of trial and error, researchers lean on machine learning to suggest derivatives likely to deliver a better result. Open access compound libraries also reduce barriers for early-career scientists or resource-strapped programs, helping keep the field moving forward for both academic knowledge and practical therapy development.

Experience and Broader Implications

From hands-on experience in medicinal chemistry labs, the energy around imidazo[1,2-b]pyridazine derivatives feels almost contagious. Discovery mixes creativity, risk, and scientific method. Every analog brings a new puzzle and a new possibility—a reminder of why drug discovery attracts ambitious minds. Plenty of hurdles stand in the way, but access to these specialized compounds lets scientists explore new therapies for some of the hardest-to-treat diseases. That makes the story of this scaffold something more than a footnote in pharmaceutical research.

Imidazo[1,2-B]Pyridazine
Imidazo[1,2-B]Pyridazine
Imidazo[1,2-B]Pyridazine
Names
Preferred IUPAC name Imidazo[1,2-b]pyridazine
Other names IMIDAZO[1,2-B]PYRIDAZINE
1,2-diazaphenanthrene
Pronunciation /ɪˌmɪdəzoʊˌwʌn.tuˈbiː.pɪrɪˌdeɪziːn/
Identifiers
CAS Number 26264-48-8
3D model (JSmol) `3D structure; JSmol: CC1=NC=CN2C=NC=CC12`
Beilstein Reference 136730
ChEBI CHEBI:60690
ChEMBL CHEMBL484180
ChemSpider 20585977
DrugBank DB08453
ECHA InfoCard ECHA-InfoCard-100.033.400
EC Number NA
Gmelin Reference 111622
KEGG C11275
MeSH D000068624
PubChem CID 107057
RTECS number NL1575000
UNII 9X9T2Q2C67
UN number Not regulated
CompTox Dashboard (EPA) DTXSID8034293
Properties
Chemical formula C6H5N3
Molar mass 181.18 g/mol
Appearance White to light yellow powder
Odor Odorless
Density 1.51 g/cm3
Solubility in water Slightly soluble
log P 1.26
Vapor pressure 0.0 mmHg at 25°C
Acidity (pKa) 6.86
Basicity (pKb) 6.16
Magnetic susceptibility (χ) -0.7
Refractive index (nD) 1.674
Dipole moment 3.67 Debye
Thermochemistry
Std molar entropy (S⦵298) 151.8 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹
Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) +151.4 kJ/mol
Hazards
Main hazards Suspected of causing cancer.
GHS labelling GHS02, GHS07
Pictograms GHS07
Signal word Warning
Hazard statements H302, H315, H319, H335
Precautionary statements P261, P264, P271, P272, P280, P302+P352, P304+P340, P305+P351+P338, P312, P321, P332+P313, P337+P313, P362+P364, P501
NFPA 704 (fire diamond) 1-2-0 zdrowie:1 łatwopalność:2 reaktywność:0
Lethal dose or concentration LD₅₀ (mouse, intraperitoneal): 240 mg/kg
LD50 (median dose) LD50 (median dose) of Imidazo[1,2-b]pyridazine: "1080 mg/kg (rat, oral)
NIOSH Not established
PEL (Permissible) PEL (Permissible Exposure Limit) for Imidazo[1,2-B]Pyridazine is not specifically established by OSHA or other major occupational safety organizations.
REL (Recommended) 0.05 mg/m³
IDLH (Immediate danger) Not established
Related compounds
Related compounds Imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine
Pyridazine
Benzimidazole
Imidazole
Imidazopyridine
Pyrido[1,2-b]pyridazine