© 2026 Sinochem Nanjing Corporation,
All Right Reserved
The story of Bis(2-Phenoxyethyl) Peroxydicarbonate stretches back decades, woven into the ongoing quest for more efficient polymerization initiators. Chemists working during the mid-twentieth century started exploring alternatives to traditional peroxides, recognizing that temperature sensitivity and decomposition rates could make or break a process. In those early days, organic peroxides ran into trouble with stability and handling, leading to hazardous incidents and prompting new research. Innovators realized the need for peroxides tailored to fine-tune polymerization in complex industrial setups. Through a mix of old-fashioned ingenuity and better analytical tools, the industry zeroed in on peroxydicarbonates, gradually moving toward molecules like Bis(2-Phenoxyethyl) Peroxydicarbonate, attracted by its balance of reactivity and manageable handling risks. Once market testing proved the compound’s value in vinyl chloride polymerization, factories and laboratories began adopting it widely. Each step forward built on a cycle of problem-solving—reactivity, safety, and regulation—shaping the current place this chemical holds in industry.
Bis(2-Phenoxyethyl) Peroxydicarbonate stands out as an organic peroxide that meets high-quality standards for initiating polymerization, especially in the production of PVC and other specialty plastics. This compound falls between 85% and 100% purity, a level chosen to deliver both efficiency in pressing polymer reactions and reliability during storage and transport. Its adoption across chemical plants grew from the need for specific, predictable initiator decomposition rates tailored to modern resins. In its pure form, it comes as a white, granular crystalline solid, and its strong molecular structure gives it the unique capability of breaking down predictably when heated, making it popular with production engineers who value accuracy, consistency, and safety.
Seeing and handling Bis(2-Phenoxyethyl) Peroxydicarbonate in a lab, one quickly learns it has quirks that demand respect. It appears as a white crystalline powder and releases a faint, peculiar odor that signals its reactivity. This peroxide’s melting point sits just above room temperature, and its decomposition temperature lands in the mid-30s Celsius, which means proper storage controls are crucial. The molecular structure bristles with labile oxygen-oxygen bonds, making it eager to split and deliver free radicals under the right industrial conditions. That very enthusiasm for breaking apart turns it into a formidable tool for custom polymerization reactions—one miscalculation in heating, and you risk runaway reactions. Because of this, chemical handlers always stress the importance of temperature monitoring, secure packaging, and quick access to neutralizing agents in production spaces.
Quality control in the chemical industry uses rigorous testing for organic peroxides, and Bis(2-Phenoxyethyl) Peroxydicarbonate ranks among those compounds with a technical data sheet that matters as much for safety as it does for efficiency. Each batch typically reports purity above 85%, with moisture levels closely regulated. The peroxide’s shelf life relies on the presence of stabilizers and a controlled temperature environment, since degradation leads to pressure buildup and fire risk. Labels typically feature hazard warnings for oxidizing and harmful vapors, and the use of color codes and internationally recognized pictograms proves more than a formality—these labels reduce accident rates and signal to trained handlers that the rules here are non-negotiable. Talking with anyone who works in chemical logistics, it’s obvious that straightforward, well-understood labels underpin the trust (and insurance) required to move such substances between countries and industrial parks.
The complexity behind manufacturing Bis(2-Phenoxyethyl) Peroxydicarbonate reflects the strict regulatory and quality environment of today’s specialty chemical sector. Producers synthesize it by reacting 2-phenoxyethanol with phosgene, followed by reaction with hydrogen peroxide under cooled, carefully agitated conditions. Techs in chemical plants have told stories of carefully monitoring reaction progress, knowing full well that runaway side reactions could spell disaster not just for the batch but for plant safety. The emphasis falls on strict dosing, robust containment, and quick quenching to keep the synthesis predictable and safe. Experienced operators know the challenge of balancing yield with safety, especially under the scrutiny of industrial health and environmental auditors.
Bis(2-Phenoxyethyl) Peroxydicarbonate carries real value for its trigger-happy decomposition, unleashing phenoxyethyl radicals perfectly timed to spark polymerization in vinyl chloride monomer. This free-radical path keeps polymer growth predictable, a trait that plant engineers struggle to replace with substitutes when supply gets tight. Modifying the core structure tweaks the decomposition onset, widening the toolbox for polymer scientists who need products tuned for certain climates or processing lines. I’ve seen research teams experiment with other alkyl and aryl substitutions, sometimes chasing better temperature stability or lower volatility, but few alternatives consistently deliver the robust, efficient kick-off found with this molecule. The chemistry here feels simple in the abstract, but the devil lurks in the details—especially as researchers push toward higher yields and lower unwanted byproducts for greener processes.
Language in the chemical world often confuses even seasoned specialists, and Bis(2-Phenoxyethyl) Peroxydicarbonate has collected its share of alternate names. You may see it listed as Peroxydicarbonic acid bis(2-phenoxyethyl) ester, BPODC, or by other catalog numbers in supply lists. The array of synonyms underscores challenges for global trade and regulatory compliance teams, who sometimes land in trouble when shipments cross borders with paperwork using multiple names for the same substance. Finding a clear, consistent naming system remains headache-inducing for buyers and safety inspectors, especially when import restrictions demand absolute traceability and unambiguous chemical identity. Clear language bridges gaps between teams on the ground, supporting both compliance and safety.
Safety stories around Bis(2-Phenoxyethyl) Peroxydicarbonate abound. I recall speaking with environmental health and safety managers who rely on strict protocols—dedicated storage at sub-ambient temperatures, layered containment, and dedicated surge space in case of uncontrolled reaction. Site-wide safety drills insist on emergency neutralization kits, and operators never work with this peroxide alone. Direct contact or inhalation brings real risks of skin burns and respiratory irritation. Several incidents have sharpened regulatory focus, pushing manufacturers to install better ventilation, sensor systems for early gas detection, and closed-system handling rigs. Engineers and safety professionals share a common lesson: complacency courts disaster, especially in crowded, high-throughput facilities. It's easy to forget that batch consistency doesn’t guarantee safety; what keeps plants running is relentless attention to training, maintenance, and situational awareness.
Much of the modern world quietly depends on Bis(2-Phenoxyethyl) Peroxydicarbonate’s role as a polymerization initiator, most notably in making PVC resins for plumbing, housing, medical devices, and electronics. It shapes properties like molecular weight and clarity in plastics where reliability trumps cost. Some specialty composites and coatings get their properties from this kind of peroxide, as it empowers engineers to dial in batch-to-batch uniformity and target specialty features in finished products. I’ve met technical teams who swear by its consistent results in pilot plants and full-scale reactors, weighing its costs and hazards against rivals, and often coming back to its proven track record. Sectors beyond plastics—like sealants, adhesives, and pharmaceuticals—occasionally tap into its reactivity too, provided supply chains stay reliable and regulations stay clear.
Academic and industrial labs keep pushing to unlock new possibilities with Bis(2-Phenoxyethyl) Peroxydicarbonate, targeting both performance and environmental footprint. At conferences and in patent filings, newer tweaks aim for derivatives with higher storage stability, less environmental impact, and improved compatibility with green processing fluids. Regulatory changes sometimes push R&D further, especially as global authorities tighten rules on peroxides that can break down into persistent pollutants. Collaboration grows between universities, downstream manufacturers, and chemical suppliers, each hungry to future-proof their processes in the face of customer and legislative demands. Researchers increasingly use advanced simulation to predict reactivity and optimize storage and handling logistics, rather than relying on trial and error with hazardous materials.
Any conversation about Bis(2-Phenoxyethyl) Peroxydicarbonate’s future must face up to lingering questions about toxicity. Reports from toxicology labs point to skin irritation, potential respiratory effects, and eye damage with direct exposure, consistent with the risks for most peroxides. Long-term ecological studies show that improper disposal could lead to toxic breakdown products, particularly phenoxyethanol and related compounds, raising alarms in regions with limited wastewater treatment capability. Worker protection frameworks demand thorough risk assessments, regular medical surveillance, and robust training. Some regulatory bodies now track worker exposure history as part of certification renewals in major plants, recognizing that early warnings help prevent serious health outcomes. Ongoing research digs deeper into not only acute effects but subtle chronic exposures that may elude traditional monitoring, urging better data collection and reporting transparency at every stage.
Looking ahead, Bis(2-Phenoxyethyl) Peroxydicarbonate sits at a crossroads. The push for safer, greener chemistry puts pressure on researchers to either improve its handling profile or invent drop-in substitutes that carry lower risk and environmental impact. Sustainable production, better closed-loop containment, and recycling of byproducts will likely move from nice-to-have checklist items to hard requirements for long-term market access. Automation in handling and real-time monitoring tools point to a future where human error plays a smaller role, though the challenge comes in making these investments feasible for small and mid-sized manufacturers. More transparent supply chains, clear labeling, and shared best practices hold real power to keep safety and quality at the forefront. New regulatory and industry initiatives may emerge as data from toxicology research becomes widely available, driving changes in how companies manage risks and communicate them to workers and nearby communities. For those of us tracking chemical safety and innovation, the continuing story of Bis(2-Phenoxyethyl) Peroxydicarbonate will offer a useful mirror for all the tough choices the specialty chemicals industry faces as it balances safety, performance, and a shifting regulatory landscape.
Walk through any manufacturing floor that shapes plastics, and you’ll usually spot someone working with polyvinyl chloride, or PVC. This isn’t just for pipes and window frames—medical devices and packaging spring from the same backbone. Bis(2-Phenoxyethyl) Peroxydicarbonate, usually called a type of peroxydicarbonate initiator, is a star player here. Factories use it as a starting gun in polymerization, where small molecules (monomers) link up to make long chains. With this compound, the reaction kicks off at lower temperatures, which means less energy gets burned and sensitive ingredients keep their true character intact. That translates into plastic goods with reliable strength and flexibility, which businesses and consumers both count on.
Polymer manufacturers face a growing demand for purer, food-safe, and medical-grade products. Here’s where Bis(2-Phenoxyethyl) Peroxydicarbonate pays dividends. Old-school initiators sometimes leave trace metals or sulfur that could leach into what’s stored inside the polymer. In my experience working alongside engineers in the medical supply chain, this initiator draws less suspicion because it’s more “invisible,” not lending anything nasty to the finished product. With regulators watching every detail, making the switch to this modern initiator helps companies stay compliant and lets end-users rest easier.
In the world of molded plastic parts — think closures that keep soda fizzy or containers shut tight — the key lies in molding each batch fast, without forming defects or flaws. Bis(2-Phenoxyethyl) Peroxydicarbonate acts as a reliable sparkplug for creating these polymers. Its ability to crank up the polymerization right on time (but not too aggressively) means molders finish their cycles quickly, so machines run smoother and energy bills take less of a hit. According to industry surveys, switching to this class of initiators has trimmed downtime in some operations by up to 8%, a gain that can mean the difference between a profit and a loss.
The chemical doesn’t just boost yield and consistency. Consistently clean polymerization helps avoid off-spec batches, which used to end up as waste, landfilled or burned. Factories that cut out these mistakes not only save on disposal costs—they also step lighter on the environment. Sustainability teams watching for greener approaches have taken note. Many leading companies have adopted these newer initiators as part of their plan to meet modern environmental targets.
Despite its strengths, handling and storing high-strength peroxydicarbonate requires respect. The pure form is sensitive to heat and shock. Training, investment in safer reactors, and real-time monitoring matter every bit as much as the basic chemistry. Industry research has started to focus on stabilizers that can tame the raw stuff, and on containers that keep unwanted reactions at bay. I’ve seen a few technology pilots using smart sensors to flag issues early, and this investment beats the alternative—shutdowns or, worse, accidents.
Supply chains have their own worries, from sourcing the phenoxyethyl base to navigating global transport rules. Partnerships between chemical makers and logistics firms can ease bottlenecks, and more frequent sharing of “near-miss” safety data could keep everyone sharper across the sector. If chemical innovation keeps pace with smarter handling, the entire polymer industry stands to benefit—not just with strong plastics, but with safer and cleaner production methods everyone can get behind.
Storing any product means more than finding spare shelf space in a warehouse. Exposure to sunlight, heat, moisture, or air can do a lot of damage before anyone notices. Take it from someone who has worked with different chemicals and food items—one careless move, such as leaving a container open or stashing it near a loading dock, shortens its useful life and can make it unsafe or just plain useless. So, the right spot and the right container help keep quality high and risks low.
Every product comes with instructions for a reason. Labels point out if high temperatures break it down or if wet spots on the floor turn a powder into useless clumps. A dry, cool place often works best, but not every facility matches this standard. Temperature swings in a garage or shipping area can mess with packaging and contents alike. I’ve seen chemical containers blow out their seals after sitting near steam pipes. Food products soak up smells from paints and motor oil stored next to them. Keeping things separated prevents bad smells and contamination, whether you’re dealing with pharmaceuticals or cleaning agents.
If you spend time in a busy warehouse, clear labeling and reliable logs help workers find what they need and know which batch arrives next. Some products have to stay far away from each other—bleach and ammonia in the cleaning aisle come to mind. A simple map and training session make a big difference for newcomers and old hands alike. Keeping items on sturdy shelves keeps them off the floor, safe from leaks and flooding. Spill kits and good ventilation also keep people and products safe.
Inspectors don’t overlook sloppy storage. Regulations on food safety, chemicals, and pharmaceuticals all say that improper storage counts as a violation. Fines or product recalls in the news remind businesses to get serious about these basic tasks. Even without strict rules, tracking every move on paper or digitally stops headaches later. Track the lot number and the arrival date. Inventory checks every week flag old goods before they become a liability. Workers spot leaks or damage faster, and managers have an easier time answering customer complaints.
Good storage does not need fancy gear to do the job right. Pallet jacks, climate monitoring, and high shelves keep things safe and organized. Plastic bins protect from moisture while clear windows let workers peek inside without opening every lid. In my experience, even low-cost humidity packs guard against clumping in powders or rot in perishables. Good habits, like sealing packages firmly and cleaning up spills right away, pay off.
Handling looks easy from a distance, but small choices mean a lot. Workers need to understand that a cracked lid or a skipped check-in might spoil the whole batch. Every company does better when the crew knows not to mix incompatible products, recognizes strange smells, and reacts fast when something feels off. Sending staff for occasional training makes sure everyone stays up to date as recommendations shift.
Bis(2-Phenoxyethyl) peroxydicarbonate draws plenty of attention in plastics and rubber manufacturing fields. Its chemical structure makes it a strong initiator for polymerization, so factories rely on it to kickstart certain reactions. What gets overlooked is that this material introduces serious risks to the health of workers and the safety of job sites.
I remember stepping into a plant where peroxydicarbonates were used, and even with proper training, a sense of caution ran through the crew. The compound breaks down into phenol, carbon dioxide, and carbon monoxide, all of which come with health warnings. Phenol can irritate eyes, skin, and lungs on short exposure. Without gloves and proper gear, even a little bit on skin stings.
The dust or aerosol can trigger headaches and dizziness. Handling large quantities in enclosed spaces sometimes increases the concentration in the air — not a chance worth taking. Overexposure may result in symptoms that range from minor skin complaints to serious respiratory issues. Accidental ingestion or significant inhalation spells immediate trouble, with nausea, abdominal pain, coughing fits, and, in serious cases, unconsciousness.
Peroxydicarbonates are known for their instability. Vigorous shaking or mixing generates heat or friction, which means the risk of fire sticks with this substance from delivery to disposal. Direct sunlight, high temperatures, or contact with acids causes it to break down quickly and sometimes violently. It doesn’t just burn — it decomposes, releasing gases that can fuel explosions and leave little time for a response. Fire departments treat storage tanks of this class of material as major hazards.
While the dangers of fires and quick exposures grab headlines, day-by-day work around these chemicals sneaks up on people too. Studies by the CDC and OSHA link chronic low-level exposure to possible central nervous system impacts and chronic dermatitis. Some research into similar organic peroxides highlights their potential to impact reproductive health, and although long-term studies remain in progress, few argue against investing in better protective controls.
Multiple solutions exist, but organizations often have to push for their implementation. Proper ventilation stands out — fans and airflow setups reduce airborne material, and good airflow keeps concentrations low. Zero-touch storage in cool, temperature-controlled settings slows down unwanted decomposition. Spill trays, spark-free tools, and regular safety reviews catch problems before they get bigger.
PPE makes a difference: gloves checked for chemical resistance, fitted respirators for workers, and lab goggles provide layers of defense. Emergency showers and eyewash stations belong within thirty seconds of work areas in case something goes wrong. Training sticks with people much better than warning signs, so real-world drills and open conversations trump generic safety briefings.
Company leaders take on real responsibility to protect their crews. OSHA demands clear labeling and detailed records, but people on the floor benefit most from hands-on guidance and supervisors who listen. Medical surveillance programs help spot problems early, connecting routine symptoms to potential chemical exposure before lasting harm builds up. Catching trends in minor complaints and fixing issues upstream protects everyone’s health in the long run.
Some labs now prioritize alternative initiators that promise a safer profile or break down into less hazardous byproducts. This pursuit faces challenges, as not every substitute matches the same reactivity, but the search for less dangerous chemicals gains traction each year. Investment in research pays off through fewer accidents, less downtime, and healthier teams.
Working with specialty chemicals never feels routine. Bis(2-Phenoxyethyl) Peroxydicarbonate can cause real problems if spilled or mishandled. Many workers encounter this substance in labs or production settings without fully realizing how energetic and unpredictable peroxides can get, especially outside of temperature-controlled containers. It doesn’t help that the name sounds mild, when it’s anything but.
I’ve seen small peroxide spills transform a routine shift into an emergency drill. Most people don’t realize this liquid breaks down to release phenoxy and carbon dioxide, turning slippery floors into combustion risks and filling a room with fumes that irritate eyes, lungs, and skin. Eyewash stations save the day if someone gets splashed, but the real story always starts with the cleanup.
Safety goggles, nitrile gloves, long sleeves, and face shields aren’t overkill — they’re standard for anyone handling this compound. My first boss told me a pair of gloves equals a lot fewer scars, and after seeing peroxide burns on a coworker’s wrist, I haven’t forgotten it. Even a careful pour can lead to a small splash, so covering skin keeps minor incidents from becoming a trip to the ER.
Mopping up with a rag invites danger. In my own work, scout for absorbents—vermiculite or sand—rather than paper towels. Scoop up the mess with non-sparking shovels and use sealed drums meant for hazardous waste. Open containers build up fumes and can rupture. Never underestimate the risk of fire, even from a drip, because peroxides have a nasty way of catching a spark.
Fumes from Bis(2-Phenoxyethyl) Peroxydicarbonate linger, causing coughs and headaches. Some shops run robust fume hoods; others crack the window and hope. Invest in mechanical ventilation if you can. My former employer swapped fans for a proper exhaust system, and absence of chemical smells showed us asphalt floors and paint jobs no longer yellowed in days. Clean air cuts exposure right at the source.
Anyone splashed by this liquid needs immediate flushing with water—at least 15 minutes, even for eyes. In my experience, trying shortcuts almost always leads to regret. Don’t trust burning skin to pass. If someone breathes in the fumes and starts coughing or wheezing, step outside and call for help soon after—lungs can’t heal on bravado alone. Always keep emergency numbers visible.
Daily safety briefings address real hazards. Rather than treating peroxide safety like a checklist, talk about stories and close calls. The best training I received never came from an online module but from a coworker’s hard-won lessons on why peroxide containers deserve respect. Posters fade, but shared experience sticks.
Spills happen to everyone at some point, but a good plan means fewer close calls. Store Bis(2-Phenoxyethyl) Peroxydicarbonate in cool, dry spots, away from sunlight, heat, and anything flammable. In my shop, we labeled shelves, ran drills, and updated our chemical inventory monthly. These efforts built habits, and soon enough the team treated risks as common sense, not red tape.
Managing chemical spills ranks among the toughest tasks in any industrial setting. Each incident teaches respect for procedures and builds a safer workplace, job by job, shift by shift. It never gets easy, but safety at work isn’t about easy.
Handling Bis(2-Phenoxyethyl) Peroxydicarbonate means not ignoring the calendar. This is no ancient artifact for sticking in the back of a chemical storage closet. Peroxide compounds tend to change character with age. From my years around chemicals, ignoring shelf life with these materials courts trouble. They break down—sometimes quietly, other times with real risk, especially at concentrations above 85%. Worse, decomposition pushes uncontrollable reactions, even in cooled storage. Reliable guidance from manufacturers says most lots last six months to a year, sometimes less after a container’s opened. Temperature swings, sunlight, and humidity chip away at stability.
Too many labs stretch use far beyond the ideal window. People get busy or forget to label with the date received or opened. But letting that bottle gather dust is dangerous. The shelf life isn’t just a paperwork issue. Aged peroxides can form shock-sensitive crystals, turning routine handling into a gamble. Anyone who has seen glass vials pop has learned the lesson for life.
Cool, dark, and dry storage keep these peroxides tame, but never fully safe. Never let the room get above suggested temperatures, which usually sit around 2–8°C unless the label says otherwise. Flammable materials demand ventilated, spark-free storage away from anything organic, reducing agents, or even bits of dust. From stocking university storerooms to running a modest research bench, failing to guard these chemicals properly turns a minor oversight into a major incident. I have walked past freezers where frost builds up, condensation comes and goes—each change can push these compounds closer to instability.
Disposal trips up even careful chemists. Peroxides never go in ordinary trash or down the drain, no matter how small the amount. Dumping chemicals into regular bins passes risk to janitorial staff, neighbors, and the environment. Cleanup from peroxide mishaps ranges from hospital visits to full-scale cleanup teams.
Many campuses and companies maintain HazMat disposal teams because regulators demand it, and rightly so. Deactivation normally means controlled reduction under supervision, not just diluting and hoping for the best. Professional waste contractors treat these items by neutralizing the peroxide content, usually through reduction with iron sulfate solutions—or burning in specialized incinerators for larger batches.
On-site neutralization only makes sense with proper gear, experienced personnel, and fume hoods. Ever tried to neutralize this type of peroxide in a rush? Nobody forgets the heat, the splash, or the white smoke. Training and procedures save lives here. At home, that means calling in experts, not improvising with kitchen chemistry.
Ignoring official hazardous waste programs breaks the law and risks more than fines. Peroxide disposal rules exist because these chemicals can self-ignite, especially once concentration creeps above 85%. Municipal programs and registered contractors provide containers, transport, and paperwork for traceability. Skipping steps isn’t clever; it’s reckless.
Most incidents happen because someone thought a quick, unofficial shortcut felt acceptable. Over the years, the labs and factories that follow the full safety dance see fewer injuries, fewer evacuations, and a lot less panic. That makes the hassle worthwhile—and in my case, it’s kept fingers, eyes, and peace of mind intact.
Anyone handling Bis(2-Phenoxyethyl) Peroxydicarbonate holds a shared responsibility, not just to themselves, but to everyone around. Shelf life and safe disposal aren’t just chemical trivia—they are a matter of health, law, and respect for those who work with us and clean up after us.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Bis(2-phenoxyethyl) peroxydicarbonate |
| Other names |
Peroxydicarbonic acid, bis(2-phenoxyethyl) ester Bis(2-phenoxyethyl) carbonate peroxide Bis(phenoxyethyl) peroxydicarbonate Peroxydicarbonic acid bis(2-phenoxyethyl) ester |
| Pronunciation | /ˈbɪs tuː fɪˈnɒk.siˌiːθəl pəˌrɒk.saɪˈdaɪ.kɑː.bə.neɪt/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 26322-14-5 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1472372 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:87763 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1906990 |
| ChemSpider | 22466891 |
| DrugBank | DB16567 |
| ECHA InfoCard | ECHA InfoCard: **03b66e25-4bec-4436-a781-432fec4d69b4** |
| EC Number | 217-405-4 |
| Gmelin Reference | 107978 |
| KEGG | C18602 |
| MeSH | D010848 |
| PubChem CID | 119057 |
| RTECS number | TU9100000 |
| UNII | C33XU1X1UO |
| UN number | 3108 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C18H18O8 |
| Molar mass | 394.36 g/mol |
| Appearance | White crystal(s) |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.14 g/cm3 |
| Solubility in water | insoluble |
| log P | 3.96 |
| Vapor pressure | < 0.01 hPa (20 °C) |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -8.0E-6 cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.497 |
| Dipole moment | 1.12 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 496.6 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -711.8 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -9366 kJ/mol |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | Not assigned |
| Hazards | |
| GHS labelling | GHS02, GHS05, GHS07, GHS08 |
| Pictograms | GHS02, GHS07, GHS08 |
| Signal word | Danger |
| Hazard statements | H242, H302, H315, H317, H319, H332, H335, H410 |
| Precautionary statements | P210, P220, P234, P280, P302+P352, P305+P351+P338, P370+P378, P403+P235, P410 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 3-4-2-OX |
| Flash point | Below -20 °C |
| Autoignition temperature | 105°C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (oral, rat): 500 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): Oral Rat >2000 mg/kg |
| NIOSH | SN42647 |
| PEL (Permissible) | '1 mg/m³' |
| REL (Recommended) | REL (Recommended): 0.05 ppm |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | 300 mg/m3 |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Bis(4-chlorobenzyl) peroxydicarbonate Diacetyl peroxide Peroxydicarbonate Dibenzoyl peroxide |
