© 2026 Sinochem Nanjing Corporation,
All Right Reserved
Chemical research makes its biggest strides not because of flashy headlines, but with the persistence of folks who spot potential where others see risk or complexity. Bis(1-Hydroxycyclohexyl) Peroxide, often tucked away in the catalogues of specialty chemicals, comes from a long lineage of organic peroxides first explored in the early 20th century. Chemists of that era hunted for compounds that could kick-start polymerization or serve as initiators in material synthesis. Along the way, they landed on a family of dialkyl peroxides, driven by a need for more efficient catalysts. Advances in purification and stability testing expanded their applications through the plastics boom of the 1970s and 80s. Bis(1-Hydroxycyclohexyl) Peroxide, through this slow evolution, gained its place not by chance but by showing up with reliability in labs and factories where precision matters.
Folks who work with plastics, rubber, or specialty resins often depend on materials like Bis(1-Hydroxycyclohexyl) Peroxide to get their jobs done. This compound acts as an initiator in processes that require controlled, steady polymer growth. Production scales range from modest batches for R&D projects to industrial volumes heading into large reactors. In my own experience, joining a research group meant getting familiar with a range of chemical “helpers” like this one—compounds that rarely make headlines but whose purity, consistency, and performance keep entire supply chains humming. Large manufacturers care about lot-to-lot reliability because a tiny hiccup in peroxide quality can shut down a multi-million-dollar line. My mentors looked at peroxides as the unsung champions behind high-precision plastics found in everything from optic fibers to car components.
Anyone handling Bis(1-Hydroxycyclohexyl) Peroxide knows the importance of physical properties like melting point and solubility. In its pure form, it generally appears as a white, solid powder, stable only when kept cool and away from shock or friction. The strong peroxide odor can make you pause the first time you open a container—there’s a sharp edge to it. The structure boasts two 1-hydroxycyclohexyl groups attached to a central peroxide bond. The compound’s stability in storage depends on temperature and the presence of compatible stabilizers. Technicians and warehouse managers handle it carefully because peroxides can shed oxygen quickly, posing a risk of fire or explosion if mishandled. Over the years, new packaging and stabilization methods improved shelf life and made bulk transport a little less nerve-wracking.
Labeling and documentation matter more to end users than most realize. In my own lab days, a misread technical spec could derail an entire experiment. Bis(1-Hydroxycyclohexyl) Peroxide typically demands purity levels close to 100% for critical applications, with strict limits on moisture content and organic impurities. Accurate hazard labels, including UN numbers and pictograms, keep workers safe. I often saw teams double-checking not just the name, but synonyms used for this product, like “CHP” or “Peroxymonocyclohexanol,” to avoid confusion during ordering or inventory. Regulations evolved as pyrotechnic incidents and workplace accidents forced tighter reporting and packaging standards. It’s easy, after a few years in the field, to spot the difference between well-run shops and those that cut corners on chemical management.
Turning cyclohexanol into such a peroxide involves more than mixing two things together. The process requires careful oxidation, precise temperature control, and catalysts to generate the peroxide bond. In industry settings, the reaction usually runs in a closed system to capture volatile byproducts and reduce exposure risks for workers. Chemists monitor each parameter closely—those who’ve ever dealt with runaway peroxide reactions know how quickly things can go sideways. Small research outfits sometimes experiment with variations on the process to tweak yield or purity, while major manufacturers prefer the tried-and-tested setups. Even after synthesis, purification steps can make or break the batch. Dragging out trace solvents or ensuring moisture stays low becomes a matter of pride—and necessity—for professionals who sign off on the certificate of analysis.
The main draw of Bis(1-Hydroxycyclohexyl) Peroxide lies in its role as a radical initiator. In practical terms, that means dropping this peroxide into a reactor packed with monomers will spark chain-growth reactions, turning basic molecules into tough, durable polymers. Some labs also exploit its reactivity for the controlled modification of organic molecules, including cross-linking rubber, preparing coatings, or synthesizing specialty adhesives. The reactive oxygen-oxygen bond can split under heat or UV light, launching free radicals that start the polymerization process. During my graduate studies, I watched technicians “dial in” the amount and timing to balance speed and control—too much, and the mix sets up before it pours; too little, and nothing happens. Adjustments often require experience, not just theory, to get the most out of the compound in any end-use.
In catalogs and shipping manifests, Bis(1-Hydroxycyclohexyl) Peroxide hides behind a slew of names. Besides the long-form IUPAC, you’ll spot terms like “CHP,” “Peroxymonocyclohexanol,” and regional trade names. Brief stints in purchasing convinced me how a mix-up with product synonyms can lead to expensive mistakes or safety incidents. Some countries also classify it under collective lists of organic peroxides, which complicates international shipments and customs clearance. Chemists and regulatory staff find themselves double-checking chemical abstracts numbers and synonyms for every order, knowing a single slip could halt production or risk regulatory action.
Long experience around hazardous chemicals builds respect that safety isn’t just bureaucratic window dressing. Bis(1-Hydroxycyclohexyl) Peroxide, like all organic peroxides, reacts violently if dropped, heated uncontrolled, or mixed with incompatible substances. Storage in tightly sealed, temperature-controlled rooms forms only the first line of protection. Factory workers and lab staff receive training not simply because they “have to,” but because too many have seen minor slip-ups turn ugly. Temperature monitoring, regular hazard audits, and strict separation from oxidizable or combustible materials reduce accidents. Personal protective gear—face shields, gloves, antistatic boots—become habit, not an afterthought, after a few near-misses. Updated material safety data sheets in local languages keep everyone on the same page; no one in the chain, from delivery driver to process chemist, takes things for granted anymore. In many places, government regulators demand yearly audits and unannounced spot checks before signing off on licenses.
Plastics and elastomers benefit most from Bis(1-Hydroxycyclohexyl) Peroxide’s initiator power. Complicated manufacturing lines depend on it for controlled polymerization of polyethylene, polypropylene, and specialty resins. Beyond bulk plastics, producers of adhesives, sealants, and specialized coatings rely on this material to start and steer certain reactions. Emerging research in biomedical materials and advanced composites often circles back to peroxides for tailored polymer architectures. Conversations at industry conferences usually highlight how small tweaks to the peroxide recipe or process timings can bring about a leap in material performance—whether you want softer plastics, UV-resistant films, or tougher tires. My time in a quality assurance lab repeatedly proved that even minor differences in initiator purity or handling ripple through finished product quality in ways straightforward recipes just can’t predict.
R&D teams in universities and companies continue pushing the boundaries by exploring new formulations and improved safety profiles. One area sparking genuine excitement focuses on reducing thermal decomposition risks, enabling the use of peroxides like Bis(1-Hydroxycyclohexyl) Peroxide at lower temperatures. Another trend tracks the use of digital tools and sensors for real-time process control, cutting down on errors and unsafe conditions. Many researchers spend months perfecting new co-initiators or stabilizers that lengthen shelf life without compromising effectiveness. There’s also a quiet but determined push to find “greener” synthesis methods, using less toxic precursors or solvent-free processes, in response to tighter environmental rules. Even incremental improvements here can mean millions saved downstream, fewer accidents, and a smaller environmental footprint.
Health effects form a core concern in the regulatory and practical handling of peroxides. Decades of studies focus on both acute and long-term toxicity for compounds like Bis(1-Hydroxycyclohexyl) Peroxide. Inhalation can cause respiratory irritation or worse, while accidental skin contact burns or sensitizes. Environmental scientists warn of aquatic toxicity and possible persistence if residues slip through factory waste streams. My mentors often drilled into us how to evaluate both personal and ecological exposure, emphasizing that regulatory “safe limits” rarely capture the complete picture in real-world use. Training sessions reinforced emergency cleanup methods, with direct lessons learned from older cases of spills and accidental releases on production floors. Ongoing improvements in analytical testing and bioassays continue to fill knowledge gaps, guiding new safety policies and equipment upgrades.
Industry watchers and R&D insiders agree that demand for advanced polymer initiators will keep growing, driven by innovation in electronics, automotive parts, medical devices, and renewable energy technologies. Bis(1-Hydroxycyclohexyl) Peroxide’s strengths—impressive initiation power, reliable performance, adaptability—align well with this expanding canvas. Current priorities in research include building safer formulations, reducing waste and risks, and cutting production costs without sacrificing quality. Automation and digitization in manufacturing may give a fresh boost to process safety, tracing every ounce used and waste generated. As green chemistry principles gain traction, future developments may steer toward less hazardous alternatives, biodegradable residues, or closed-loop recycling of process reagents. The next generation of chemists, having learned from past mistakes and successes, will set new standards for safe, sustainable use of specialty peroxides, carrying both risks and rewards forward for years to come.
Bis(1-hydroxycyclohexyl) peroxide works as a chemical kickstarter, pushing molecules to join up and form solid plastics. In the manufacturing world, this compound acts as a curing and crosslinking agent. Factories use it mainly to harden polyester and vinyl ester resins. These plastics go into boats, building panels, car parts, and pipes. The reason this peroxide matters: it delivers fast, uniform hardening so the finished products turn out strong, resilient, and consistent.
Imagine you’re building a fiberglass boat hull. If the resin doesn’t cure evenly, the hull might have weak spots or surface flaws. With Bis(1-hydroxycyclohexyl) peroxide, the resin goes from sticky to solid in an even sweep. This makes a clear difference in durability and quality, especially in products exposed to rough weather or heavy use. For me, seeing how boats or pool linings last longer because of smart chemistry brings home just how central these chemicals have become.
Factories count on this peroxide because, compared to some older options, it works well at room temperature and doesn’t put out a strong odor. That helps in big workplaces where air quality matters for both workers and nearby communities. Another point: compared to some peroxides of the last century, it reduces the risk of explosive reactions and fires. That’s not just good news for people on the production floor; it helps lower insurance costs and keeps regulatory agencies satisfied.
From my old days working near a manufacturing site, I know how much the choice of cure agent can shape both product quality and worker safety. Every batch of resin carries risks if the chemistry isn’t dialed in. Even small process tweaks, like adopting a more stable peroxide, have ripple effects across a whole operation. This is where facts from safety studies back up what old-timers in the field will tell you: safer chemistry can save money and lives.
No chemical comes without tradeoffs. Bis(1-hydroxycyclohexyl) peroxide, if mishandled, can irritate skin, eyes, or lungs. Plants need strict storage and handling—cool, dry spots away from other reactive substances. Firefighters also need to know the risks if they get called to a site with stockpiles. Some recent reports have questioned what new breakdown products might mean for long-term health or waterways. Government agencies set exposure limits to keep people safe, but close attention matters. Manufacturing groups now lean into programs that trace chemicals from plant to product, building in more safety checks and audits.
Demand for lightweight, strong plastics keeps rising, and that keeps chemicals like Bis(1-hydroxycyclohexyl) peroxide in steady use. At the same time, watchdogs and consumers push for safer, greener options. Some research goes toward biodegradable alternatives that might one day take the place of petroleum-derived resins and their additives. Until that shift arrives, the focus stays on safer processes, worker training, and careful monitoring of supply chains. Each small improvement can make a difference that ripples through entire industries—and right through to the people who use these plastics every day.
Walk into any workspace where chemicals, powders, or even workshop gadgets come into play, and the first thing you’ll spot are gloves, masks, goggles. They all matter, but there’s more to safety than tossing on gear. Digging into the details of the product’s hazards—skin absorption, dust inhalation, even just a splash in your eyes—shifts how you move through your day. A simple slip-up can send someone to urgent care before they get their coffee. I once watched a colleague handle an unfamiliar solvent without checking the label. He rinsed his skin after a splash, but the burn showed up about an hour later. Ever since, I look for hazard symbols right away instead of just trusting the packaging or guessing based on color and smell.
Every product with risk potential should come with a Safety Data Sheet (SDS), not as a dusty binder item, but as your day-to-day playbook. The best shops I’ve worked in took five minutes each week to flip through the main hazards as a group. Chemical burns, sneaky respiratory threats, or even delayed reactions like headaches or skin irritation—each gets attention. The more you read labels and SDS info, the less guessing you go through when things don’t smell or look right. Studies from NIOSH show that workers who review safety documents regularly cut their accident rates by a third compared to those who treat SDS like fine print.
Gloves, splash-proof goggles, and organic vapor masks make sense for strong chemicals. But not every glove stops every product. Nitrile can dissolve with some strong solvents; latex doesn’t help against sharp tools. A face shield blocks splashes, but a respirator protects against invisible particles. I’ve found that rotating through PPE based on what you’re doing—not what looks comfortable—matters more than any policy ever printed. OSHA has a running list of common gear failures, and most issues start when workers choose what’s “easy” over what works. Skipping gear just because you’re in a hurry almost always backfires during those “quick” jobs.
Dozens of stories talk about workers getting sick because a storage closet doubled as a mixing area or a vent fan sat busted for months. When products let off fumes, you need airflow, open windows, or proper hoods. If you store chemicals near food, sunlight, or any heat, you add extra problems nobody wants when a lid leaks or a reaction kicks off. The EPA recommends storing chemical products in cool, well-ventilated areas with easy-to-read labels. Growing up in a rural town, we kept farm chemicals in a locked shed far from the house. Even back then, one whiff told you when something leaked—it pays off to check those spots every day rather than once a season.
Real safety training saves more than rulebooks. Fire extinguishers, eyewash stations, exit routes—they all need to be part of the daily routine. New folks learn the basics in the first week, but even veterans can slip up during routine. Sharing stories about close calls and running through drills isn’t overkill; it’s how old-timers and rookies keep each other on track. According to the CDC, regular hands-on training makes workers catch twice as many hazards compared to places that only run through the basics at hiring.
Relying on routine or assumptions turns little risks into big emergencies. Treat safety steps as living habits, not static rules. With the right info, fitted protection, solid storage, and honest conversations, accidents drop and everyone gets to clock out in one piece.
Handling chemicals such as Bis(1-Hydroxycyclohexyl) Peroxide never leaves room for guesswork. This organic peroxide shows up in polymer industries and laboratories, helping kick-start reactions, but it brings its own set of dangers. It’s classified as a strong oxidizer and stands out for being sensitive to heat, impact, or even friction. Leaving it lying out on a shelf or in a sun-warmed cabinet just adds to the risk of spills, contamination, or worse—unexpected decomposition. Incidents in industrial settings have shown that small oversights often carry big consequences, especially when storage gets overlooked.
It makes a difference storing Bis(1-Hydroxycyclohexyl) Peroxide away from sunlight and sources of heat. Anything that bumps or knocks can trigger dangerous reactions, so a cool, dry, and well-ventilated area helps keep everything safe. In facilities I’ve worked at, keeping this kind of peroxide refrigerated, usually below 30°C, has become a non-negotiable rule. Refrigeration cuts down the risk of self-accelerated decomposition, which can otherwise lead to fires or explosions.
Placing it in a tightly sealed, original container avoids accidental mixing. Polished workspaces avoid cross-contamination. No one should ever store organic peroxides beside flammable materials, acids, bases, or heavy metals. Even small leaks or vapors can create a dangerous chain reaction, something I’ve seen nearly happen when a poorly labeled drum ended up near incompatible chemicals.
People in charge of chemical inventories rely heavily on clear labels. Containers marked with hazard pictograms, date of receipt, and expiration dates help prevent old or degraded material from causing trouble. Over time, even a properly stored organic peroxide can break down, so rotating stock makes sense to avoid buildup.
It also helps to train everyone who may come into contact with these chemicals. Ignorance isn’t bliss in a lab or plant environment—it’s danger. Awareness saves lives. Repeated drills, refresher training, and proper signage lower the odds of slip-ups. Proper labeling keeps unwitting hands from grabbing the wrong bottle.
It’s tempting to look for shortcuts, but using dedicated chemical storage refrigerators built for flammable and oxidizing agents removes a lot of headaches. I’ve watched companies invest in monitored storage with alarms, which alert people to temperature shifts or unauthorized openings. These systems let you catch issues before they become crises.
Spill kits and personal protective equipment have saved many from accidents spiraling out of control. A well-placed fire extinguisher nearby makes sense, especially in rooms where peroxides are kept. Having trained personnel ready to respond, not just to store, can be the difference between a near-miss and a serious event.
Good storage policies don’t just protect the immediate workspace—they safeguard everyone in the building. Manufacturers recommend always checking the product’s safety data sheet for detailed storage temperatures and compatibility charts. Staying ahead of the issue isn’t about paranoia; it’s responsible stewardship of dangerous materials.
By taking these precautions, companies avoid property damage, workplace injuries, and costly shutdowns. Long-term, commitment to these habits demonstrates trustworthiness to oversight bodies and employees alike. That’s the kind of workplace reputation that pays off—both for safety and peace of mind.
Walking through a factory or even poking around under the kitchen sink, it's clear that plenty of chemicals live all around us. Some, like acetone or formaldehyde, slip into workplaces and homes on a regular basis. I remember opening a can of paint thinner years ago, not realizing how fast its fumes would smack me with a headache. What felt like a minor irritation actually pointed to a big concern: solvent vapors like these irritate lungs and eyes quickly, and with enough contact, the impact digs far deeper than discomfort. Breathing in these vapors over months or years goes beyond shortness of breath or coughing—chronic exposure can wreck the respiratory system, stress the heart, or even rattle the nervous system so memory and concentration lag behind.
Too many folks ignore gloves because the damage isn’t obvious right away. Solvents and acids often seep into the skin before you even notice more than a tingle. I’ve watched a few coworkers shrug off red, itchy hands after scraping chemical pumps. Later, tiny splits in the skin turned raw, making any touch painful. Acids can leave burns and blisters after a brief splash, and caustic dusts like lye float in the air long enough to sting the eyes. Over time, repeated exposure destroys skin’s natural barrier, opening doors to infections and even long-term sensitivity. Direct eye contact doesn't just sting—it can cause permanent vision problems.
The nastiest hazard hides in long-term effects most people brush off since they aren’t immediate. Chronic exposure to benzene, for example, risks more than headaches and dizziness. Studies show a real link between benzene and blood cancers like leukemia. Carcinogens rarely give warning, so years of low-level exposure bring damage long before disease hits. The EPA states that even low concentrations in indoor or outdoor environments put people at risk. And chemicals like phthalates and some pesticides hang around in the body, disrupting hormones and contributing to fertility problems or developmental delays in kids.
Chemical leaks seep into water, air, and soil and quietly create wider threats. A spill in one warehouse found its way into a river near where I grew up, and it hit the local fish population so hard that fishermen noticed the drop in just a season. Chemicals like mercury or PCBs build up in wildlife, and the food chain guarantees those poisons don’t stop at the riverbank. Neighborhoods near old industrial sites face rates of asthma, developmental issues, and even cancers that don’t show up in the suburbs. Cleanup costs never disappear, and no one can measure the emotional toll of polluted water or contaminated soil on a whole community.
Years spent on shop floors and in labs showed me the value of attention, real information, and simple habits. Training matters most. Knowing what’s in a bottle or a barrel—and what a spill or puff of dust can do—makes every difference. Protective gear is cheap compared to the cost of treating injury or illness. Local exhaust fans, well-kept containers, and straightforward storage routines lock down a lot of risk. Community programs that teach people about chemical safety in the home can help as much as workplace regulations. The science keeps evolving, but a mix of clear guidelines, practical gear, and honest communication lowers the odds of disaster.
Getting rid of chemicals like Bis(1-Hydroxycyclohexyl) Peroxide isn’t as obvious as tossing out old paint or expired food. This peroxide appears in many industrial settings, from plastics manufacturing to lab research. One look at its safety data sheet makes it clear – this is not something that belongs in a household trash bin or poured down a drain. People have seen the results of shortcuts: environmental damage, fire hazards, and injury to workers or bystanders.
Bis(1-Hydroxycyclohexyl) Peroxide, sometimes called BCHP, has a spotty reputation for a reason. It acts as a strong oxidizer, raises fire risks, and reacts with common substances like acids, metals, or even just the wrong temperature. Touching it or breathing in its dust can cause skin burns, eye damage, or breathing issues. Stories from small labs and workshops show what can happen when someone tries to handle it like ordinary trash.
Most local garbage collectors won’t touch hazardous chemicals for good reason. Municipal waste facilities aren’t set up for something that can burst into flames or cause health problems. Most cities require anyone with BCHP to contact certified hazardous waste contractors. These professionals train daily for complicated scenarios. They collect, package, label, and transport peroxides following strict Department of Transportation and EPA rules. If you manage a lab or a factory, you’ll already know the paperwork eats up time, but it never compares to the costs from an accident or a regulatory fine.
In some communities, folks grew used to flushing old chemicals down the drain. Modern wastewater systems can’t break down many organic peroxides. Once BCHP enters the sewers, it finds its way into rivers and lakes, where it lingers in sediments and harms fish or plants. EPA studies show trace levels of specialty chemicals building up in local water supplies causes childhood development issues or subtle shifts to ecosystems.
While storing leftover peroxide, keep it in its original container and avoid glass or metal. Keep it cool, away from sunlight, and far from anything that sparks. Tight seals prevent accidental spills. Label containers clearly. These habits come from people who’ve watched chemical rooms catch fire from sloppy habits.
Disposal needs a record. The law expects waste generators to document what they toss – how much, what type, and who takes it away. Contractors provide shipping and destruction certificates. These form a paper trail. Skipping documentation invited trouble for several labs fined after regulators traced illegal dumping back to them. Good records keep managers confident if anyone asks where that barrel went.
Reducing reliance on dangerous chemicals sometimes means switching to safer initiators for manufacturing. Some companies now use less reactive peroxides or alternative processes for making plastics, lowering disposal volume. For those handling BCHP, minimizing purchases and planning better, so leftovers stay low, will always beat tossing gallons into the waste stream.
This peroxide brings real fire and health risks. Every step in disposal, from storage to paperwork, shields a community from harm. Keeping professionals in the driver’s seat, resisting shortcuts, and looking for safer alternatives at the source means everyone breathes easier. Safe is always better than sorry, and with strong chemicals, everyone who works with them knows this in their bones.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Bis(1-hydroxycyclohexyl) peroxide |
| Other names |
Peroxide, bis(1-hydroxycyclohexyl) Bis(cyclohexanol) peroxide Bis(1-hydroxycyclohexyl) peroxide |
| Pronunciation | /ˈbɪs wʌn haɪˌdrɒksiˌsaɪkloʊˈhɛksɪl pəˈrɑk.saɪd/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 1883-11-6 |
| Beilstein Reference | 3014304 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:87141 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL185492 |
| ChemSpider | 151109 |
| DrugBank | DB11336 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03ffb1ae-5e4a-4349-995a-7bde6f50b9f7 |
| EC Number | 207-408-8 |
| Gmelin Reference | 78660 |
| KEGG | C18634 |
| MeSH | D017973 |
| PubChem CID | 197400 |
| RTECS number | MU9470000 |
| UNII | JK10U7ZG2L |
| UN number | 3109 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C12H22O3 |
| Molar mass | 242.34 g/mol |
| Appearance | White crystalline solid |
| Odor | Slightly pungent |
| Density | 1.11 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble |
| log P | 2.7 |
| Vapor pressure | <0.01 hPa (20°C) |
| Acidity (pKa) | 13.4 (±0.5) |
| Basicity (pKb) | pKb = 16.8 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -5.8E-6 cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.517 |
| Viscosity | Viscous liquid |
| Dipole moment | 3.4969 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 336.5 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -570.6 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -810.6 kJ mol-1 |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | D01AE17 |
| Hazards | |
| GHS labelling | GHS02, GHS05, GHS07, GHS08 |
| Pictograms | GHS05,GHS07,GHS09 |
| Signal word | Danger |
| Hazard statements | Hazard statements: H242, H302, H315, H319, H335, H410 |
| Precautionary statements | P210, P220, P221, P234, P280, P302+P352, P305+P351+P338, P370+P378, P410, P411+P235, P420, P501 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 3-1-4-OX |
| Flash point | 77 °C (closed cup) |
| Autoignition temperature | > 140 °C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 Oral Rat 3000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 Oral Rat 3400 mg/kg |
| NIOSH | SN4290000 |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not Established |
| REL (Recommended) | 0.05 ppm |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | 100 ppm |
