© 2026 Sinochem Nanjing Corporation,
All Right Reserved
Digging through the history of diazonium chemistry uncovers a story of relentless curiosity. The pursuit of functionalized diazonium salts, dating back to the discovery of diazotization processes in the 19th century, showcases how creative minds drive progress by refusing to settle for the obvious. Chemists started with simple aromatic amines and basic diazotization, but the hunger to explore new dye and coupling agents lit a fire under later researchers. Fast-forward, and compounds like 4-Benzylethylamino-3-Ethoxybenzenediazonium Zinc Chloride emerged from the desire to combine reactive diazonium groups with more tailored electronic and solubility profiles. This isn’t just another step in chemical development—it’s what happens when people seek answers to complex synthesis challenges and want compounds that go beyond textbook basics. Zinc chloride, used as a stabilizer, extends the usable shelf life of these otherwise finicky salts.
4-Benzylethylamino-3-Ethoxybenzenediazonium Zinc Chloride reflects careful design. By attaching a benzylethylamino group at the four position and an ethoxy group at the three position on a benzene ring, chemists change reactivity and push boundaries of compatibility with other reagents. The diazonium function at the core transforms this into a powerful source of electrophilic aromatic substitution and azo coupling. Throw in zinc chloride as the stabilizing partner, and you land a product that finds its balance between reactivity and shelf-stability. It goes by other names, too, depending on the regional context or the application—sometimes shortened, sometimes described by its functional groups—but the essence remains a versatile reactive intermediate.
This compound doesn’t hand out easy wins to those who get careless. The crystalline salt appears pale yellow to orange because trace impurities or decomposition byproducts can color the material even in dry, well-kept samples. It holds a characteristic, somewhat pungent odor—nothing you’d describe as pleasant, but it certainly makes itself known. Solubility often frustrates young researchers, as organic diazonium salts in inorganic matrices dissolve readily in water but only so-so in organic solvents, with the specific substituents shifting the solubility profile. One of the most important features is thermal sensitivity; just a moderate increase above room temperature can crank up the risk of explosive decomposition. A deep respect for temperature, humidity, and light seals the difference between success and failure in the lab. Zinc chloride stabilizes the shelf-life, but it never erases the risk.
Labels on jars never tell the whole story. Sure, technical details matter: chemical purities, moisture content limits, recommended storage conditions, and standardized hazard pictograms make life easier for regulatory inspectors and lab newcomers. But anyone who’s mixed, weighed, or handled this kind of salt quickly learns that knowing the specs can’t replace experience. Batch purity needs frequent verification—impurities or residual solvents ramp up the risk of side reactions or instability. Labels may list melting points or decomposition temperatures, but actual performance often shows batch-to-batch variance, especially if the salt sits on a shelf or endures a few power outages in the storage room. Risk mitigation stems less from reading documentation and more from watching for the faintest shift in color, texture, or smell, combined with a keen memory for past close calls.
Synthesis takes a steady hand and a clear head. The first step brings together 4-Benzylethylamino-3-ethoxyaniline and sodium nitrite in cold, acidified solution—often hydrochloric acid on ice, where the aniline gets diazotized with nitrous acid generated in situ. Timing is merciless; slow addition and unhurried stirring keep the temperature low and the formation under control. Zinc chloride follows, introduced with just the right cooling, coaxing the unstable diazonium ion to form a more robust double salt. Skipping any part of careful cooling, or not keeping reagents pre-chilled, leads to runaway side reactions, dangerous gas evolution, and—if things go truly wrong—an untimely detonation. The whole method requires more than technical skill: it demands patience, precision, and a steady presence of mind. Scale-up to production feels like a tightrope walk, with cooling jackets and remote-controllable dosing systems as non-negotiable safeguards, not luxury add-ons.
In a practical sense, the reason this compound sparks so much interest traces to its relentless ability to react. That diazonium group looks for partners—phenols, aromatic amines, and even some active methylene groups—for azo coupling. Tuning the benzylethylamino and ethoxy groups lets chemists drive reactions towards custom dyes, complex intermediates, or unique surface modifiers. I’ve witnessed labs try dozens of variations in substituent ratios or positions to tune color fastness or absorption spectra for dyes. Recent work even points to its use in click-chemistry-inspired reactions, where rapid, modular functionalization happens in water or benign organic solvents. Some groups attempt partial reduction or substitution of the diazonium group, proving that innovation outpaces even the most comprehensive reaction textbooks.
While systematic names anchor the compound within IUPAC nomenclature, daily work often deals in short forms—BEAEB diazonium zinc chloride, or simply "the ethoxy diazonium salt". A few publications mention the compound with a focus on its functional groups. These names bridge the formal and informal, reflecting the environment—manufacturing labs, academic research, or patent filings. Chemists who speak the language of practical synthesis end up coining their own nicknames, sometimes based on color, purpose, or even mishaps. Clarity gets challenged across countries and across manufacturing groups, nudging the need for globally standardized identifiers, such as CAS numbers, with the caveat that these still can’t replace clear word-of-mouth communication in the heat of experimentation.
No matter how “routine” this salt becomes in a skilled lab, its hazards refuse to fade. Like many aromatic diazonium salts, shock and friction sensitivity lands it on the short list of substances that can never be handled casually. I’ve seen researchers jump backward as small, unintended decompositions flashed in solution, sometimes leaving singed glassware or, in one case, a fume hood with fresh scorch marks. Direct ingestion or even skin contact spells trouble: delayed burns, sensitization, or systemic toxicity remain perennial concerns. The real wisdom comes not from paperwork, but from people insisting on cold rooms, eye shields, remote transfer tools, and—just as importantly—rigorously dry storage conditions with backup refrigeration or desiccant guards. Those with stories from hazardous waste cleanups or decontamination after accidental spills become the best teachers. The consistent lesson holds: never get comfortable, never let your guard down.
Dyes and pigments bear the clearest historical footprint here. The tailored absorption properties and reactive coupling of this compound drive its use in producing vivid, stable azo dyes for everything from textiles to plastics. But new frontiers have shifted attention to materials science, where chemists graft diazonium-derived groups onto surfaces—modifying carbon nanotubes, fine-tuning electrode surfaces, or creating sensors with ultra-sensitive detection capabilities. Pharmaceutical development has explored modified analogs for pro-drug synthesis or bioconjugation, although the direct medical use of these sensitive intermediates remains fraught with toxicity and stability concerns. Much of the buzz in R&D now lies in niche areas: printable electronic inks, smart textiles, biocompatible coatings. The driving force in all these cases is not novelty for its own sake but the compound's ability to out-perform older, less versatile coupling agents when the application calls for reliability and tunable performance.
Academic and industrial teams continue to unravel new uses for this compound—often spurred by the dual pursuit of sustainability and efficiency. Green chemistry approaches have experimented with milder acids, recyclable catalysts, and solvent-minimized reaction conditions, spurred on by both regulation and conscience. Funding agencies and patent offices encourage tweaks in the substitution pattern to improve specificity or reactivity in entirely new domains. Every promising pathway bumps up against issues: scale-up risks, unpredictability in stability, supply chain hiccups for tailored intermediates, and concerns over environmental persistence of byproducts. Collaboration among synthetic chemists, chemical engineers, and toxicologists has become the only realistic way to turn flash-in-the-pan laboratory results into real, manufacturable solutions.
Nobody in chemical research walks away from toxicity studies with indifference. Detailed investigations trace not only acute toxicity but also chronic exposure risks, mutagenicity, and persistence in biological systems. Aromatic diazonium compounds received special scrutiny for their breakdown into phenols and other potentially mutagenic intermediates—a problem that restricts their use in direct-contact applications or food-adjacent industries. In aquatic systems, breakdown products trigger concern over bioaccumulation. Responsible practice means not only robust gloves and closed systems for handling but also thoughtful waste management and post-reaction quenching to destroy residual diazonium species before release into shared waste streams. Anyone who’s seen environmental or health regulators cite contamination incidents learns quickly: this chemistry, for all its creative upshot, exacts a steady price for thoughtless disposal or uncontrolled exposure.
The path ahead for 4-Benzylethylamino-3-Ethoxybenzenediazonium Zinc Chloride reflects the cross-currents shaping modern science—escalating demand for high-function, low-failure chemicals balanced against higher safety, environmental, and performance standards. Technology evolves alongside regulation, with manufacturers and researchers nudged by legal, logistic, and ethical pressures to trim risk from both synthesis and use. Continued investment in predictive toxicology, digital monitoring, and modular process design looks like the most promising counterweight to traditional risks. The compound’s fate in industrial and research pipelines will depend on maintaining a realistic appreciation for its power while embracing the discipline to control it at every stage—from benchtop powder weighs, through scale-up reactors, to downstream, responsible disposal. Respect for the old lessons and energy for the new challenges will keep its story alive in chemistry classrooms and labs alike.
Walk into any modern print shop or fabric finishing facility, and you’re likely to discover a colorful world powered in part by chemicals most folks have never heard of. 4-Benzylethylamino-3-Ethoxybenzenediazonium Zinc Chloride falls into that group—quietly essential, yet largely anonymous outside professional circles. My own time spent at a textile plant made me pay attention to these “behind the scenes” chemicals. Staff would talk about certain compounds making or breaking their dye batches, and this one’s name came up during conversations about reliable color reproduction in challenging projects.
The heart of this compound’s reputation comes from its place in diazo-based dye and printing systems. These diazonium salts have been central to the development of light-sensitive coatings. Photographic paper, blueprinting, and specialized textile prints all draw on their unique abilities. The zinc chloride add-on helps with stability—which means longer shelf life and more predictable performance for techs mixing up emulsions or prepping printing screens.
From experience, I know that nothing kills a production run faster than unstable chemicals. Factory floors slow down when batches turn bad, and that can cost thousands of dollars an hour. Research has shown that adding zinc chloride not only boosts the stability of the diazonium salt but also cuts down on decomposition that would otherwise leave a residue on prints. A steady chemical means clear images—whether the project involves complex circuit board designs or simple T-shirt patterns.
Some labs push the chemistry even further. Researchers and product engineers have been experimenting with diazonium compounds like this one in organic synthesis, looking to make particular aromatic rings for pharmaceuticals and advanced materials. Since the diazonium group can be swapped out easily for other functional groups, it’s become a kind of chemical “shortcut” to more complex molecules. It’s not only the dye or print industry that benefits—pharma and material sciences rely on the same basic principles.
In classrooms, these compounds turn up in lessons about coupling reactions. If you talk with chemistry teachers at local colleges, they’ll tell stories about their favorite experiments using diazonium salts. A safe, stable chemical on the shelf means let’s students learn hands-on without surprise dangers or messy cleanups.
As with any specialty chemical, safety follows close behind utility. Diazonium salts can be touchy, sometimes breaking down to release nitrogen gas or other byproducts. The addition of zinc chloride has tamed some of the worst unpredictability but hasn’t erased all risk. Material safety data for 4-benzylethylamino-3-ethoxybenzenediazonium zinc chloride stresses personal protective gear, good ventilation, and avoiding contact with skin or eyes.
One challenge faced in older facilities is proper storage. Too much moisture or heat can set off a cascade of problems. After years working in a building with uneven climate control, I saw how strict labeling and isolation of sensitive materials kept headaches to a minimum. Training staff remains the best defense. Regular drills on chemical handling and spill cleanup keep accidents in check.
Green chemistry innovators want alternatives that cut out heavy metals and risky byproducts altogether. Some startups have started pitching plant-based stabilizers and safer salts. Right now, the performance gap between the old standard and these experimental blends still shows, but turnover takes time. Until that balance shifts, the industry relies on careful handling, expert oversight, and solid science to put the compound’s strengths to work without putting people or products at risk.
Handling chemicals isn’t just a science lab exercise. From cleaning supplies to industrial solvents, most people will come across hazardous chemicals at some point on the job or at home. Even small mistakes can turn a routine task into an emergency room visit. Recognizing the risk up front sharpens the focus. If skin gets exposed to corrosives, tissue damage can happen fast. Inhaled vapors might cause dizziness, headaches, or long-term breathing problems. Chemical safety isn’t just red tape. It means protecting yourself, loved ones, and sometimes coworkers from real harm.
The most important step before touching any chemical is reading the label and the Safety Data Sheet (SDS). Every chemical sold for business or consumer use comes with details on hazards, compatibility, and safe use. Most people skip this part, or glance over it. Yet the most common injuries come from not knowing what you’re dealing with. If the label says "toxic" or "corrosive," storing it in the kitchen next to snacks can be a recipe for tragedy. I’ve seen cases of children burned or poisoned after someone poured a chemical into a water bottle to save space.
Once you know what’s in the bottle, get the right gear. Gloves that protect against acids don’t always work against solvents, so matching gloves to the chemical matters. Safety goggles with splash protection beat regular glasses every time. If the chemical gives off strong fumes, I go for a respirator or make sure the space has lots of fresh air. People sometimes think opening a window is enough, but volatile chemicals can quickly fill a room, especially in basements or bathrooms. Keeping spills off clothing is as much about choosing proper lab aprons or chemical-resistant coats as it is about attention to detail.
No one plans for a spill, but planning makes the difference. Spill kits—complete with absorbent pads, neutralizing agents, and gloves—should be nearby, not buried in a back closet. Washing stations and clean water relieve burns faster than calling for help. Chemicals should never be left in open or unlabeled containers. It’s not just a workplace rule; at home, unmarked containers leave family members at risk. Double-checking labels and storing chemicals below eye level in sealed, stable containers avoids some nasty surprises.
Never mix chemicals unless you are sure they’re compatible. I learned this lesson early, mixing household bleach with an acidic cleaner out of ignorance. The cloud of chlorine gas taught me a lesson nobody forgets. More than 6,000 emergency room visits each year result from cleaning product mishaps like this. The consequences sneak up fast—irritated eyes, burned lungs, panic. Simple rule: store incompatible chemicals apart, and never mix unless the label or instructions say so.
The big takeaway is that chemical safety comes down to respect and preparation. Accidents often happen not from malice, but routine and carelessness. I’ve worked with chemicals for more than a decade and have seen coworkers harmed by shortcuts more times than I’d like to admit. Establishing procedures—always reading the SDS, wearing the right gear, and locking away dangerous supplies—pays off in safety and peace of mind. For families and workers alike, these habits keep tragedies out of the news and keep people healthy. When it comes to hazardous chemicals, experience and a safety-first mindset always pay.
Some chemicals call for extra care the moment they arrive in the lab. 4-Benzylethylamino-3-Ethoxybenzenediazonium Zinc Chloride fits that bill. Anyone working with diazonium salts learns quickly that these materials won’t wait around quietly for mistakes; many have set labs on edge with their instability and reactivity. Zinc chloride pairing may add a layer of complexity, but diazonium compounds themselves deserve respect no matter their makeup.
Storing this particular chemical depends a lot on what risks sit in its formula. The key problem always comes down to temperature control and moisture protection. Diazonium salts often break down fast when exposed to warmth or damp air. A humid day in July sets off more anxiety than any deadline. Explosive decomposition stirs real nerves. I remember once when even a tiny sample, left out by accident on a bench, led to a sharp pop and the unmistakable stench of decomposition. Nobody in the building forgets that sort of thing.
Start with a secondary containment box—never rely on a thin glass bottle in a crowded fridge. Choose a cooler or freezer with strong temperature controls. I keep a temperature log taped to the outside. If the freezer temperature rises above -20°C, a supervisor gets a call. Plenty of labs stick with chest freezers just for sensitive materials, and I’ve never regretted the extra effort it takes to label and lock away diazonium compounds separately from less dangerous chemicals.
Moisture is the other menace. Desiccators filled with silica gel might seem overcautious, but one accidental whiff of decomposition products pushes even doubtful chemists to take the advice. Screw-cap bottles with Teflon-lined seals do most of the heavy lifting. Expect a big red warning label. It isn’t for show. Too many people have ruined months of work (or worse, risked their health) because they underestimated a caution sticker.
Anyone can read the incident reports: multiple injuries and property damage came directly from mishandled diazonium salts. I’ve seen a researcher land in the hospital with respiratory trouble simply due to inhaling breakdown fumes. It never makes sense to gamble with questionable storage for a substance this reactive.
Chemical manufacturers include storage instructions for a reason. Some publish thorough hazard assessments: improper storage accounts for nearly one-quarter of unexpected laboratory accidents involving diazonium salts, according to American Chemical Society surveys. Add zinc chloride’s own irritant properties and the hazards double.
Proper disposal is just as important. Outdated samples need careful deactivation away from heat and open drainage, always inside a fume hood. Forgetting about an old vial is the fastest route to a frightening cleanup job.
Committing to robust storage habits makes labs safer and keeps projects on track. Use only clearly-labeled, airtight containers. Dedicated refrigeration space, dry environments, and a storage log that tracks expiration means one less surprise down the road. Encourage a culture where everyone checks expiration dates and respects chemical boundaries.
Training should walk every new staff member through the risks, not just hand over the SDS and hope they read it. Regular drills add muscle memory so that handling, spill response, and emergency procedures become second nature. Nothing replaces hands-on practice and clear warnings.
Safe chemical handling always starts before the lid ever comes off the bottle. For truly sensitive reagents, the smallest attention lapse can lead to disaster. I’ve learned to treat storage guidelines not as limitations but as personal insurance—protecting both people and discoveries.
Every chemical product starts with its formula. The formula isn’t just a bunch of letters and numbers—it's a blueprint. It tells you what’s inside. Experience in both labs and industries shows that missing or unclear formulas lead to confusion or even safety risks. The formula, such as NaCl for table salt or C6H12O6 for glucose, communicates exactly what is being handled, which matters both for science and for daily users. If you ask for sodium chloride and get something else, you might see ruined experiments or, worse, dangers to health. Mislabeling or confusion has caused costly recalls in the food sector and hazards in classrooms. Accurate formulas save time and protect both investments and lives.
Purity stands on equal footing with the formula. Purity tells you how much of the product is the main substance and what portion, if any, comes from contaminants. Say you buy hydrogen peroxide for science class. Pharmacy-grade bottles contain around 3% hydrogen peroxide, diluted for home use. The version found in labs can go up to 30% or higher. Accidentally using the wrong concentration, or a bottle full of impurities, might end up damaging materials or, worse, putting people at risk.
Contaminants in reagents or materials have thrown off the results in research, causing failed tests and lost weeks of effort. Take baking as an everyday example—using salt mixed with sand would completely ruin the results. It’s no different in the chemical world. Products like pharmaceuticals or water treatment chemicals leave no room for error. Impurities that seem trivial can lead to serious health concerns.
Manufacturers have a responsibility to list both the chemical formula and the purity right on the label or safety information sheet. Lack of clear information has caused headaches in technical support rooms. Incorrect assumptions about formula or purity have cost teams energy, money, and trust. Many companies in the chemical space have responded by demanding detailed certificates of analysis and batch documentation. These steps prevent accidents and help workers feel confident about what they hold in their hands.
Strong product labeling forms the foundation of safe handling. That means formula and purity are verified at each step, from factory floor to shipping dock. Regular audits and third-party quality checks serve as backstops. Custom labeling software helps prevent human slip-ups and lets suppliers update labels right away when batches change.
Training plays a big part. I’ve seen labs cut down on mistakes after simple workshops on reading chemical labels and safety sheets. In busy research centers, these lessons stick. Chemists and technicians pay close attention to every label detail, watch for known contaminants, and double-check batch numbers before they pour a reagent or mix a compound.
Digital access now helps bridge gaps. Scanning a barcode on a chemical tub can pull up safety data and test results. Smart companies act on this right away, linking purchasing and safety teams and keeping everyone in the loop on formula updates or recalls.
The stakes for information about chemical products run high. Health, results, and reputation all hang in the balance. For anyone working with chemicals, clear answers to “What is the chemical formula and purity of this product?” make the difference between a safe project and a costly mistake.
I've spent my fair share of time handling everything from common cleaners to sketchy lab reagents, and the one question that lingers in everyone’s mind is, “Where is this supposed to go after I’m done?” Tossing a compound down the drain or in the dumpster might seem like the easy route, but that can turn out ugly. A gallon of leftover solvent or an ounce of unused pesticide doesn’t just disappear. Once those chemicals leave your space, they start showing up in places they absolutely shouldn’t—creeks, tap water, maybe even your next bag of veggies.
Laws don’t exist just for paperwork’s sake. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) lays the foundation—if you’ve got a compound on the hazardous waste list, it gets strict treatment. You can’t wing it, not if you value clean groundwater or want to keep your community’s landfill from turning into a science experiment. Some stuff, like mercury or chloroform, can poison water with just a small spill. Others, like old paint thinner or certain cleaning fluids, catch fire with a spark—imagine that, burning trash from nothing more than a heartless toss.
Chemicals don’t act the same once you get them out of the bottle. Mislabeled containers and mix-ups in disposal have caused real fires, injuries, even deaths. School labs have earned visits from hazmat teams because of simple mix-ups, often just from stuffing everything into a single brown bag and hoping for the best. That’s plain reckless, and it only takes a single mistake to put a whole building at risk.
I remember a local mechanic who figured old brake fluid was no big deal, so he poured it behind his shop. A few rainstorms later, the grass died and neighbors noticed a chemical tang in the neighborhood creek. The cleanup ran into tens of thousands and broke the shop’s back. Once people start calling in regulators, there’s no “oops” that gets you off the hook. Fines rack up, and trust goes right out the window.
It happens in homes too. Dumped batteries and light bulbs put mercury in the garbage trucks, and from there, into the air. One time, a neighbor dropped an old thermometer in his trash. Those fumes sent his garbage collector to urgent care. Mistakes like that don’t just stain your record—they hurt people for real.
Knowledge holds the key here, not heroic effort. Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) spell out exactly how substances should leave your workspace. Ask at the local waste facility or look up the environmental agency guidelines—they want folks to ask. Public drop-offs for electronics, paint, old medicine, or other common toxins cut risk and cost nothing. Many colleges and businesses now train workers, not just with tedious lectures, but by showing what a quick spill or bad toss-down does to real places. That sticks with you after you see the mess up close.
Small acts go a long way: label everything, keep chemicals separated, and hand leftovers off to approved waste sites. Ask questions. Pressure companies to share instructions, not just warnings. Push for cities and schools with real plans, not “figure it out” strategies that let things slip until disaster strikes. If everyone does that, gallons stop getting poured behind buildings, and the places where we eat, play, and breathe stay safer for good.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | N-Benzylethyl-2-ethoxy-5-diazonioanilinium zinc dichloride |
| Other names |
Fast Red B Fast Red Base B C.I. 37235 4-(Benzylamino)ethoxybenzenediazonium zinc chloride C.I. Azoic Diazo Component 5 |
| Pronunciation | /for-ben-zil-eth-il-uh-mee-noh-three-eth-ox-ee-ben-zeen-die-ay-zoh-nee-um zink klor-ide/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 1312945-76-4 |
| 3D model (JSmol) | `3Dmol.js|5WlTR-dzxp3oDICD5A3Q0:4-Benzylethylamino-3-Ethoxybenzenediazonium Zinc Chloride` |
| Beilstein Reference | 1468401 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:21807 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL4085061 |
| ChemSpider | 23902272 |
| DrugBank | DB13879 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03e3ebb6-c535-487d-a6ba-01108b1aa2a0 |
| EC Number | EC 939-815-5 |
| Gmelin Reference | 146798 |
| KEGG | C14645 |
| MeSH | C14H17Cl2N3OZn |
| PubChem CID | 188345827 |
| RTECS number | GV0447500 |
| UNII | W3N3T1W7WM |
| UN number | UN3437 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DV978RWW3X |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C17H20Cl2N3OZn |
| Molar mass | 511.73 g/mol |
| Appearance | Light yellow solid |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.32 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Soluble in water |
| log P | 1.9 |
| Acidity (pKa) | pKa ≈ 2.5 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 6.19 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | 'Magnetic susceptibility (χ) of 4-Benzylethylamino-3-Ethoxybenzenediazonium Zinc Chloride: -3.2 × 10⁻⁶ cm³/mol' |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.626 |
| Dipole moment | 4.12 D |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | N06DA04 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | Oxidizing, Acute Toxic, Irritant |
| GHS labelling | GHS02, GHS07 |
| Pictograms | GHS02,GHS06 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | Hazard statements: H301, H311, H331, H410 |
| Precautionary statements | P264, P270, P273, P280, P301+P312, P302+P352, P305+P351+P338, P330, P337+P313, P501 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-3-2-0 |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose) is 380mg/kg (rat, oral) |
| NIOSH | BGZ109 |
| PEL (Permissible) | PEL (Permissible Exposure Limit) for 4-Benzylethylamino-3-Ethoxybenzenediazonium Zinc Chloride is not specifically established by OSHA or NIOSH. |
| REL (Recommended) | 0.5 |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | NIOSH has not established an IDLH for 4-Benzylethylamino-3-Ethoxybenzenediazonium Zinc Chloride. |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Benzene diazonium chloride 4-Benzylethylamino-3-ethoxybenzenediazonium tetrafluoroborate 4-Benzylethylamino-3-ethoxybenzenediazonium hexafluorophosphate 4-Benzylethylamino-3-ethoxybenzenediazonium chloride |
