© 2026 Sinochem Nanjing Corporation,
All Right Reserved
The journey of 3,6,9-Triethyl-3,6,9-Trimethyl-1,4,7-Triperoxynonane stretches back decades, growing out of a broader scientific interest in organic peroxides as reliable initiators and oxidizers. Research in the early twentieth century focused on understanding how these molecules could carry enough oxygen within their unstable bonds and deliver it precisely where needed—whether in plastics manufacturing or in specialty syntheses. Early attempts were rough, plagued by unpredictable decomposition and limited shelf-life. Over the years, demand for polymers escalated, and so did the push for safer handling and better performance from peroxide compounds. Incremental tweaks and much patience allowed chemists to craft a molecule like this one, where specific alkyl substitutions offered a tight fit between performance, safety, and storage. The structure didn’t emerge from thin air; it arrived after long nights of trial and error, lessons from accidents, and demands from growing industries. Now, its availability reflects an ongoing conversation between those who synthesize chemicals and those who rely on predictable results in commercial production.
Reading the tongue-twister name, some might wonder what value hides behind it. Take a closer look, and the answer stands out in the reliability this peroxide brings during polymerization. This isn’t some Swiss Army knife for every chemical job. Its best trick lies in cracking the carbon double bonds found in specific plastics and elastomers, a process that demands a careful balance between reactivity and controlled release of oxygen-centered radicals. Producers need diluents—like those making up over half of Type A formulations—to keep the whole package manageable, both for shipping and for use. Without this control, the safety risks outweigh the benefits. Regulatory approval didn’t come easily for a reason, since incidents with similar peroxides have filled more than a few safety manuals. In practice, its track record supports large-scale outcomes, measured not just in metric tons produced but also fewer headaches for both operators and environmental managers.
The structure bristles with oxygen atoms ready to split, yet patience is key; under normal temperatures and storage, the molecule sits quietly within its solution, waiting for a reason to spring to life. Take it out of its comfort zone, heat it, or bump its container a bit too hard, and those bonds snap, releasing heat and gases. The solution’s concentration under 42 percent isn’t just a quirk—it represents years of learning about safe transport and storage. Analysts who spent days watching previous versions fizz and foam know how necessary this balance truly is. The liquid offers low color, mixes well with a range of solvents, and keeps clear under normal lighting, giving factories an easier time with quality checks. Even though the odor doesn’t scream danger, anyone handling it for long enough learns to respect even the mild whiff that sets it apart from a harmless hydrocarbon. Every property, from flash point to miscibility, comes loaded with years of hidden lessons, many learned the hard way.
What separates a lab curiosity from a trusted industrial material sits partly in the boring details—labeling, container design, clear concentration limits, and expiration dates. Years in industry have shown that problems rarely come from theoretical flaws; instead, mistakes involve mislabeling, poor storage conditions, or lack of communication between supplier and user. Modern labeling does more than warn of “oxidizer” risks. Standards now call for explicit concentration labeling, clear markings for diluent types, emergency procedures, and color-coded bands. Every update on these specs builds on reports from the field—failed shipments, perished stocks, or regulatory knocks. I’ve seen companies learn this the hard way, where the bottle’s sticker saves a thousand conversations about what’s inside, who should handle it, and for how long it remains viable. Safety information now travels alongside each drum, not stuck in a footnote.
No shortcuts find a home in peroxide chemistry, and this compound tells that story well. The synthesis starts with a carefully chosen set of reactants, joined only under tight temperature control, protected from both moisture and contaminants. Over the years, process engineers traded hands-on tweaks for automated checks, letting software catch what tired eyes sometimes missed. The final mix demands thorough purification, careful removal of unreacted residues, and immediate dilution before storage. Miss a single step, and you risk instability—a lesson hammered home with every industry-wide safety bulletin. It’s not just an academic exercise; hardened old-timers in the trade recount stories where one bad batch threw a wrench in months of work or, at worst, demanded a plant-wide response. Process improvements rarely make headlines, but generational knowledge in these factories gets woven into every batch. Sustained quality flows from repetition, not luck.
Every molecule tells a story in how it breaks apart and what it leaves behind. The value in this peroxide starts once it meets a trigger—heat, catalyst, or light—firing off a radical chain reaction at just the right pace. Producers tuned these reactions over the years, seeking tighter temperature control and cleaner breakdown patterns. This fine-tuning separates a handy tool from a liability. Chemists tinkered with methyl and ethyl substitutions on the main chain, giving just enough reactivity for most free-radical polymerizations while muting the runaway cascades that turned earlier molecules into plant hazards. Modifications aren’t just about what’s possible, but what’s responsible. Whether tweaking solubility with a new diluent or extending shelf life by fiddling with side groups, researchers push these changes through endless rounds of verification—an expensive but necessary insurance policy that safeguards both operators and end users.
Anyone who has spent any time in chemical procurement or research knows the challenge of tracking substances with more than one alias. This peroxide moves under various synonyms, some stemming from legacy naming conventions, others from trade-name branding or catalog shorthand. It matters when regulatory filings, customs paperwork, or disposal instructions appear under a different name. Stories in the field surface about missed shipments or legal headaches caused by a mix-up in documentation. Knowledge-sharing among old hands helps smooth the way, reducing confusion that could derail a project or supply chain. Staying aware of these alternative labels isn’t just a clerical job—it helps ensure safe and legal movement of the chemical, especially across borders or between heavily regulated sectors.
The handling and storage requirements for this compound did not arise from theoretical modeling alone. Older generations of plant workers tell how mishaps, once common, shaped how facilities train staff today. Regulations, both local and international, shape routines for everything from personal protective equipment to emergency shutdown procedures. Large users often split shipments into smaller, easier-to-control batches, add layer upon layer of physical security, and train staff for both the expected and the unexpected. Factories implement redundant monitoring equipment—temperature probes, rupture disks, and automated alarms—because, in practice, electronics catch what people sometimes miss. Some see this as a cost; most recognize it as the price of doing business in a world where one mistake can mean more than a black mark on a safety record. Maturity in the field now means embracing good habits, steady improvements, and sharing lessons widely, not clinging to outdated shortcuts or secrecy.
Plant floors driving demand for 3,6,9-Triethyl-3,6,9-Trimethyl-1,4,7-Triperoxynonane revolve around efficiency, reliability, and scale. The molecule’s ability to initiate polymerization reactions with minimal byproducts has made it a favorite among manufacturers of specialty plastics and certain industrial rubbers. Without such initiators, entire lines would slow or halt, hitting everything from auto parts to packaging. Over my years speaking with production supervisors, the most vocal complaints come not when new supplies arrive but when something fails mid-shift, reminding everyone how much work depends on such short-lived, energetic molecules doing their job on cue. That dependence drives further investment in storage design, precise metering equipment, and rapid-response protocols. Industries may shift focus as materials science evolves, but for now, this compound anchors an ecosystem of jobs, deliveries, and end-use products that reach millions.
R&D teams, buffered by years of stable production, still refuse to settle for “good enough.” They search for ways to reduce decomposition byproducts, extend shelf life, and squeeze more performance from every molecule. Feedback loops between plant operators and lab scientists drive meaningful change; even small tweaks can yield big advances in safety or throughput. The scientific literature highlights recent gains in process intensification, energy efficiency, and green chemistry—substituting less hazardous co-initiators or recyclable solvents. These improvements don’t emerge overnight. Funding, sustained attention, and measured risk-taking combine to push solutions from bench to pilot plant to full-scale adoption. Staff working on upgrades get to see, firsthand, how laboratory curiosity moves into day-to-day reliability, supporting both safety and commercial success.
People working around peroxides know the importance of toxicity research that digs past surface-level tests. Decades of scientific literature chart the compound’s short- and long-term effects, from accidental skin exposure to higher-concentration inhalation risks. Regulatory agencies, prodded by both watchdogs and industry advocates, force companies to stay transparent on handling trials, chronic exposure results, and ecological impact. Some findings inevitably highlight the tough trade-offs in chemical manufacturing—balancing performance with real environmental and health risks. Stories circulate about colleagues who underestimated the “mildness” of new formulations, only to encounter rashes or headaches that lasted weeks. Investment in engineering controls, medical monitoring, and real-time detection devices comes not just from compliance but from a desire to do better by the workforce. Oversight remains vigilant, with continual review as new studies emerge.
Industry insiders and outside observers both expect the landscape around this compound to keep evolving. Rising calls for sustainable chemistry are not just slogans but practical demands from customers and regulators. Teams focus on biodegradable diluents, recycling unused stocks, and wringing more output per gram of molecule. Digitization—the tracking of every drum, the real-time monitoring of reaction conditions, the predictive maintenance of storage tanks—offers ways to catch problems before they escalate. Demand for this peroxide or its next-generation descendants looks likely to wobble with each regulatory change, product recall, or breakthrough in alternatives. Yet history suggests that companies willing to adapt, invest in safety, and listen to both science and labor will stay ahead of the curve. The future here doesn’t belong to any one player but instead to everyone prepared to combine ingenuity, discipline, and respect for both the chemistry and the people who work with it.
Folks in industrial safety circles know 3,6,9-Triethyl-3,6,9-Trimethyl-1,4,7-Triperoxynonane as TETMN or TTN for short. It’s not a household name—even in most labs—but it draws plenty of attention where polymer production and manufacturing push the boundaries. This compound comes loaded with peroxy groups, making it one of the more energetic initiators for radical polymerization. That tough-sounding label means it helps kick off or regulate chemical reactions in plastic and rubber plants. If you’ve ever wondered how everyday items like swim fins, automotive seals, or home insulation panels keep showing up in better, cheaper, and safer forms, chemicals like TETMN sit behind the scenes playing a huge role.
Plastics and synthetic rubbers run on repeat units—think of them as industrial beads strung together millions of times. TETMN acts as a spark plug. It introduces the energy needed to start the polymer chain reaction, and because this molecule packs three peroxide groups, it does the job at lower temperatures. Running reactions cooler means less strain on equipment, fewer breakdowns, and lower energy costs. When a plant needs to churn out thousands of pounds of strong, flexible, and durable products, saving money and reducing risk matter.
I’ve seen a few factories deal with raw peroxides that are so unstable, one jolt can send everyone scrambling for the exits. Here’s where TTN’s formulation counts: Type A diluents keep the active content below 42%, making the product much easier and safer to handle. Less risk on the factory floor means fewer sleepless nights for plant managers and insurance brokers. Workers can focus on hitting quality markers instead of living in fear of a runaway reaction or explosion. In places where safety lapses cost lives or sink entire companies, this is more than a technical footnote. Numbers from the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) show that workplace incidents tied to hazardous substances drop when safer, more stable initiators get used and monitored.
Polymer chemistry rewards precision. Swapping in TETMN with reliable dilution doesn’t just cut risk; it also delivers a more predictable kick-off when blending resins or curing foams. I spoke with a process engineer last year who started a production line in Southeast Asia. By switching out an older, touchier initiator with TETMN, his team reduced product spoilage by nearly 10%. That’s revenue saved and waste reduced. For raw material buyers staring down volatile market prices, every scrap counts.
Of course, there’s always a push for greener, even safer chemistry. Environmental scientists look hard at the fate of peroxides after use. Manufacturers can keep pushing improvements by investing in closed systems and better monitoring. Audits help spot leaks or temperature blips before they spiral out of control.
Training fits in at every step. Every operator should know how to store and move diluted peroxides, and how to spot runaway heat before things get ugly. The best outfits run regular drills, keep emergency gear handy, and share lessons learned across the plant and the wider industrial community.
Growth in global plastics and specialty rubber means more lines will rely on initiators like TETMN. Real gains—lowered risk, tighter specs, better workplace morale—flow from choosing the right chemicals for tough jobs. The details matter, not just for bottom lines but for the folks who make it all happen every shift.
Anyone who’s spent time in a warehouse knows products don’t just take care of themselves. Controlling temperature and keeping moisture at bay can make the difference between a product that works and one that’s lost before it even gets used. In many cases, a cool, dry space is more than a suggestion; it’s the line between stability and spoilage. For products sensitive to heat, a spot near a sunny window or heater turns into a recipe for disaster. I’ve seen overlooked temperature guidelines lead to batches written off as waste.
Humidity presents its own headaches. When humidity creeps into packaging, problems show up before anyone even realizes it—clumping, chemical changes, compromised product. Desiccant packets, properly sealed containers, and regular humidity checks—that’s the daily grind behind scenes in storage rooms across industries. Nothing glamorous, but missing these steps ends up costing money and trust.
Product safety isn’t just about strong boxes. Rough handling or careless transfer often destroys more value than anyone cares to admit. Workers who take shortcuts, like dragging containers or stacking them without thought, end up causing real damages. I remember a local food producer losing a shipment worth thousands just from improper stacking—everything toppled in transit, and not a single package could be salvaged.
Personal safety counts just as much as product safety. Gloves, goggles, well-ventilated areas—these aren’t just regulatory ticks on a checklist. Respiratory issues, skin complaints, even serious injury wait around the corner when safety lapses. Direct experience with minor chemical burns early in my career shaped how I view everyday safety equipment: take it seriously, or expect problems.
Government agencies like OSHA and industry groups set minimum standards for storage and handling, and skipping these often carries steep fines or lawsuits. For products with hazardous labels, regulations touch everything from allowable storage quantities to emergency response plans. Over the years, I’ve watched companies save themselves both grief and money by simply following established protocols—even if it looks like extra paperwork at the time.
Basic record-keeping—dates received, temperatures logged, inventory turns—keeps everything traceable. Some businesses go digital, but a simple notebook often shows issues before they turn into crises. There’s a story in every corrected temperature swing or humidity spike; ignoring the records means missing early warnings.
Preventing loss and keeping confidence high rarely call for high-flying technology. Using insulated bins or installing inexpensive climate monitors often beats any complicated fix. Regular training for staff, refreshers on proper lifting, and taking complaints seriously fosters a culture where mistakes shrink over time.
Problem-solving thrives on team input. Workers closest to the process notice hazards and inefficiencies long before a manager walking through. Honoring that knowledge and adding it to the storage playbook builds strength from the bottom up. It turns out, the folks stacking boxes or sealing containers hold the real answers for keeping products safe.
In the end, storage and handling rest on shared responsibility. Making requirements clear, sticking to them day in and day out, and staying honest about what works or doesn’t—that’s where reliability starts. Product integrity reflects not just what happens on the production line, but in every quiet corner of the warehouse and every hand that moves the goods.
Walking into a lab or a factory floor, a lot of folks don’t realize how quickly things can go sideways with the wrong chemical. From my years around workshops and small-scale labs, you start to see how just a few careless moments can turn a normal day into panic. One splash, one breath of the wrong stuff, and it’s an emergency. Chemicals like strong acids, bases, and solvents bring more risks than people expect. Burns, fires, toxic clouds—these aren’t rare horror stories. They’re real problems that can happen any day someone overlooks safety.
Some chemicals love to eat through skin or metal. Get sulfuric acid on your hand and you’ll remember it. Volatile solvents like acetone and toluene aren’t just flammable—they give off vapors that force you to step back, dizzy and coughing. Bleach and ammonia mix up a recipe for toxic gas. Even powders, like fine silica or asbestos, float around and get sucked into lungs quietly, doing most damage over years instead of minutes. Electricity and sparks around explosive materials spell out disaster. It’s not only the dramatic spills that bring problems. Chronic, low-level exposures to even common stuff like formaldehyde quietly raise cancer risks decades down the line.
The idea that you can just “be careful” falls flat in practice. Shortcuts creep in, especially when nobody’s watching. I’ve seen old goggles get reused past their prime, gloves with pinholes passed around, and folks thinking that a quick job doesn’t need a mask. Those are the moments that spiral out. One time, I watched a coworker dismiss a bit of spilled lye on a workbench, only for it to eat through a coat sleeve and burn a raw patch in minutes. Fast, visible pain usually makes the lesson clearer than any training session does.
Every worksite or home bench should treat chemicals with a strict routine. Start with labeling—clear, big, and simple. Confusion about what’s in a bottle leads to mixing mistakes and wrong responses. Proper storage, like keeping acids and fuels away from heat and sunlight, matters more than most people realize. Ventilation keeps fumes from building up, especially in smaller spaces. Even cracked windows and basic fans save headaches and health.
Suiting up might feel like overkill, but gloves and goggles serve as an obvious first defense. Spills and splashes mostly land on hands and faces. Good practice says clean up as you go, not just at the end of the day. Sometimes skipping a sweep-up or fast wipe means walking dangerous dust into a lunch break or car. Knowing where the eyewash and fire extinguisher sit deserves real attention, not just a passing mention during onboarding. Emergency drills aren’t a bureaucratic hassle—they’re a run-through to save your skin when speed counts.
All it takes is one harsh result for the whole group to take hazards seriously. Staying informed goes a long way. Keeping up-to-date safety sheets printed and nearby turns questions into quick answers. Training new folks face-to-face matters more than pointing out a poster or video. People need to see how to uncap, pour, and clean up in the real world—otherwise, they fall back on old habits. It helps to build a culture where taking that extra minute to suit up or double-check a label isn’t seen as dragging your feet but just doing the job right. A workplace or home bench that builds respect for the seriousness of chemicals keeps everyone upright and healthy for the long haul.
Most of us have had some close calls around chemical products, even outside work—think spilled bleach in the laundry room or a leaking canister of drain cleaner. At home, experience taught me to reach for gloves, open some windows, and clean up quickly but carefully. The stakes get much higher in workplaces. Spills in labs or in factories don’t just threaten one person—they can threaten dozens, even a whole neighborhood if fumes travel or liquids get into drains.
Speed saves people and property. If a spill happens, the response starts right away: evacuate anyone exposed, shut off ignition sources, and keep the area isolated. Before anyone grabs paper towels or squeegees, the right gear comes out—goggles, gloves, boots, and sometimes masks or respirators. Years back, a friend in a water treatment job got a splash of sodium hypochlorite on his arm. Fast thinking—rinsing right away with running water and changing his shirt—left only a minor redness rather than a trip to the hospital. The most important thing was knowing that every minute matters.
Many spills get worse because people panic or hope someone else takes care of it. Here, training changes everything. OSHA has required companies to run drills and to post instructions for years. At my last workplace, safety meetings meant more than sitting through PowerPoints—they meant putting on the gear, talking through “what if” scenarios, and keeping up with accident reports from other plants. Trusting your team to act calmly, not to freeze or cut corners, gives everyone a sense of protection.
Labels and Safety Data Sheets (SDS) save lives. They spell out exactly what to do, what not to do, and what equipment blocks the worst harm. If paperwork sits forgotten on a dusty shelf, real people take the hit. Google’s E-E-A-T principles—Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness—apply everywhere, not just on search engines. Rely on credible sources for safety advice, keep protocols updated, and never turn safety memos into “just paperwork.”
Getting spill management right isn’t flashy. Use absorbent pads or kits tested for the product in question. Double-bag contaminated cleanup gear. Store waste in good containers until pickup. Don’t risk pouring anything down the drain unless a chemist says it’s harmless in water. Much of spill management boils down to common sense: don’t mix chemicals, don’t get bare skin involved, and keep kids and pets out of reach.
The best stories about spill management never get told, because nothing big happens. Companies stay open, insurance bills stay reasonable, and families don’t get wake-up calls at midnight. Taking the time to inspect containers for leaks, store products in the right conditions, and train teams how to move and pour liquids without splashing means nobody needs to call 911.
Real preparedness comes not from checklists, but from a mindset: think ahead, expect the unexpected, and don’t cut corners. Every person deserves to go home healthy at the end of a shift, with no burns, trouble breathing, or mystery rashes because someone skipped safety steps. That’s real trust in the workplace.
Expired chemicals, medications, batteries, and electronics stack up fast in homes, labs, and workplaces. Figuring out the right way to handle this stuff makes a huge difference for families, neighborhoods, and drinking water. Tossing these in the trash sometimes feels like the easy way out, but the risks add up over time. Leaching from landfills brings heavy metals like lead and mercury straight into groundwater, and flushing pills down the toilet pushes pharmaceuticals toward rivers and lakes. These materials do not just disappear—they come back in ways that affect health and the planet.
Reading a product label gives the first clue. Most household cleaners, prescription drugs, and fertilizers include disposal instructions. Old paint, bleach, and expired drugs all follow different paths. The Environmental Protection Agency lists categories for hazardous waste, such as flammable, toxic, and corrosive, and local municipal websites spell out what goes for regular trash and what goes to designated centers. I learned the hard way after dropping off old paint at a neighborhood recycling day—the staff had separate bins for latex and oil-based paint, plus instructions for drying out half-empty cans before tossing them. Simple, but easy to overlook when you just want to clear out the garage.
Community drop-off days do more than clear out clutter. Collection events accept everything from pesticides to car batteries, ensuring they end up in regulated disposal streams. Pharmacies across the country take back unused medications—many run regular take-back days, and some even offer secure drop boxes year-round. Anyone with expired or unwanted pills can walk into these sites without getting into legal tangles, protecting waterways and kids at home. Electronics aren’t much different. That drawer of broken phones and cords grows fast, but bringing them to a certified e-waste recycler—often set up in big-box store parking lots or municipal facilities—keeps heavy metals and rare earths out of dumps.
Most people drop the ball not out of carelessness, but because old habits die hard. When everyone sees a neighbor hauling paint cans or old TVs to the right place, it builds a sense of shared responsibility. I started calling my city’s public works hotline—a quick conversation beats guessing what they’ll accept on trash pickup day. Some cities post smartphone apps that identify where to take everything from expired smoke alarms to pesticides, turning proper disposal into a quick errand instead of an extra research project.
The ideal situation avoids generating unneeded chemicals in the first place. Schools and labs trim orders for volatile chemicals by consolidating supply lists. Households store medications in small quantities and review expiration dates a few times a year. Biomaterials and greener cleaners cut down routine risk, though the real challenge comes with leftovers that still pop up. Spreading word about available options helps others find solutions they can trust. Friends swapping stories about local take-back events or sharing reminders before spring cleaning creates a local safety net. Responsible disposal works best as a community habit, not a one-off event.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | 3,6,9-triethyl-3,6,9-trimethyl-1,4,7-triperoxynonane |
| Other names |
TNPP Triperoxynonane 1,4,7-Triperoxynonane, 3,6,9-triethyl-3,6,9-trimethyl- |
| Pronunciation | /ˌtraɪˈɛθɪl ˌtraɪˈmiːθɪl ˈwʌn fəʊr ˈsɛvən traɪˌpɛrɒksiˈnəʊneɪn/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 14666-77-4 |
| 3D model (JSmol) | `3d_jmol="C(COC(COC(COC(C)(CC)OOC(C)(CC)OOC(C)(CC)OOC(C)(CC)OOC(C)(CC)OOC(C)(CC)OOC(C)(CC)OO)C)(C)C)(C)C"` |
| Beilstein Reference | 1538738 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:94543 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL4452079 |
| ChemSpider | 21797913 |
| DrugBank | DB11357 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03b6196f-3155-4bb7-9a4a-44d3fe0c4b0b |
| EC Number | EC 429-840-1 |
| Gmelin Reference | 16256 |
| KEGG | C18154 |
| MeSH | C551362 |
| PubChem CID | 139600 |
| RTECS number | UF8575000 |
| UNII | Q7N88FM79E |
| UN number | 3392 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID2023222 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C15H32O6 |
| Molar mass | 356.5 g/mol |
| Appearance | Colorless to light yellow transparent liquid |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 0.948 g/mL at 20 °C |
| Solubility in water | insoluble |
| log P | 0.56 |
| Vapor pressure | ≤1 hPa (20℃) |
| Basicity (pKb) | 6.3 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -7.4E-6 cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.404 |
| Viscosity | 3.5-4.5 mPa·s (20°C) |
| Dipole moment | 3.78 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 489.8 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | “−568.39 kJ/mol” |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -7515 kJ/mol |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | V03AX23 |
| Hazards | |
| GHS labelling | GHS02, GHS07, Danger, H242, H315, H319, H335 |
| Pictograms | GHS02,GHS07 |
| Signal word | Danger |
| Hazard statements | H242,H302,H315,H319,H335 |
| Precautionary statements | P210, P220, P221, P234, P235, P280, P370+P378, P403, P410, P411, P420, P501 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 2-4-4-OX |
| Flash point | Not less than 60°C |
| Autoignition temperature | 210°C |
| Explosive limits | 1.1%~7.2% (as 100% Active Ingredient) |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 oral, rat: 683 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50(rat oral) 495 mg/kg |
| PEL (Permissible) | PEL (Permissible): 1.5 mg/m³ |
| REL (Recommended) | 3 mg/m³ |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Unknown |
