Curiosity about pyridine derivatives runs back over a century. My interest took root flipping through stories of distillation flasks billowing in old European chemical institutes. 2,5-Lutidine, or 2,5-dimethylpyridine, didn’t jump into the limelight straight away. Chemists around the early 1900s found pyridine’s methylated cousins unpredictable; separating each isomer took skill because those small methyl groups nudge their way into the molecule’s reactivity and boiling points in odd ways. By the time labs began cataloging substituted pyridines more precisely, 2,5-lutidine caught notice for its peculiar pattern of substitution—a symmetrical pair of methyl groups giving it a distinct fingerprint in the spectrum of nitrogen heterocycles. This family grew out of coal tar processing and later synthetic work, paving the way for pyridines to support not just dyes or flavor production, but run quietly behind the scenes in pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, and research applications.
Over the years, 2,5-lutidine shook off the reputation as just another chemical in the bottle rack. The liquid doesn’t get fancy headlines, but its stability and moderate basicity offer something dependable for the seasoned chemist. An oily liquid, it doesn’t run as volatile as its lower-methyl siblings, yet it doesn’t dig in and refuse to react, either. Manufacturers in North America, Europe, and Asia tend to store it in sturdy, airtight drums, often flagged by anyone with an eye for synthetic organic chemistry. It pops up in catalogues under more names than you’d expect—2,5-dimethylpyridine, 2,5-lutidene—sometimes buried amidst more dramatic-sounding reagents but prized for its reliability in certain synthesis routes.
Every time I’ve handled 2,5-lutidine in the lab, its presence became unmistakable because of its pungent smell—not for the faint of heart. Its molecular structure has a six-membered pyridine ring jazzed up by methyl groups at the 2 and 5 positions. This makes it less volatile and less reactive than plain pyridine, but it remains quite flammable and forms sharp, colorless to pale yellow liquids at room temperature. According to trusted data, it boils around 172 °C, a detail students should note to avoid surprises on the hotplate. Being a weak base, it participates in acid-base extractions and catalysis but doesn’t wreak havoc like the stronger alkyl amines. Its miscibility and solubility lean toward organic solvents—water shies away, so phase separation after reaction clean-up gets easier. This all adds up to a compound that, while unremarkable at first glance, punches above its weight in controlled settings.
There’s not much glamour in labeling bottles of 2,5-lutidine, but anyone in a synthetic lab learns fast to check purity. Impurities, particularly water or unreacted pyridine, muddy results and afford headaches no graduate student wants to explain. Analytical data like GC-MS or NMR spectra guide the honest preparation, with reputable suppliers posting Certificate of Analysis for each lot, if they’re worth their salt. Shipping labels don’t mince words: Flammable, harmful by inhalation, and corrosive. These mundane details save time and skin as many of us know too well. For professionals moving liters across borders, hazard codes under GHS and OSHA matter more than any marketing buzzwords ever could.
Industrial and lab chemists still lean on classical routes, usually starting from pyridine and running through selective methylation. Two main paths come up: direct alkylation with methylating agents or, less often, ring closure approaches. The trick comes in controlling the conditions to target the correct ring positions—without good temperature and catalyst control, mixtures of methylated isomers pop up, and then you’re left with tedious separation. Chromatographic purification can sort things out for small batches, but for drums meant for downstream processing, distillation under reduced pressure wins on efficiency and practicality. With mounting regulatory scrutiny around methylating reagents for safety reasons, some labs look to greener, milder options. Progress feels slow but real. Those working on the benchtop feel firsthand the challenge of balancing scalability, selectivity, and operational safety.
I’ve met colleagues who use 2,5-lutidine as a base in acylation or alkylation reactions, owing to its mild basicity and low nucleophilicity—it doesn’t jump in and snatch at electrophiles, nor does it leave behind reactive side-products. In those syntheses where you just need something to mop up released protons without crowding out your starting materials, this reagent gets pulled from the shelf. Its methyl groups act as both a shield and a weak tether, steering the nitrogen’s electron density but avoiding destructive overreactions. Many downstream modifications involve oxidizing, halogenating, or even quaternizing the nitrogen, while more exotic approaches attach additional substituents at other ring positions for advanced ligand design or pharmaceutical intermediates. Pyrolysis or catalytic hydrogenation sometimes show up in specialized research, but for most practical work, lutidine serves as a helper or stepping-stone, not a flashy centerpiece.
Chemistry loves synonyms and alternate nomenclature. 2,5-lutidine bears the badge of 2,5-dimethylpyridine officially, but don’t be surprised to see it listed as simply lutidine or 2,5-lutidene in proprietary catalogs and journals. This web of names goes back to older naming conventions before IUPAC rules standardized terminology. The longer you work around fine chemicals, the more you wish suppliers would pick one name and stick with it—but historical inertia keeps those names alive in Shipping, MSDS, and procurement databases. Anyone reading journal articles old and new should double-check CAS numbers for consistency because a simple name swap can mean grabbing the wrong isomer, an expensive mistake in both time and safety.
Nothing wakes up a research team faster than a spill or inhalation incident. This chemical demands attention: contact can irritate eyes and skin, inhaling vapors burns airways, and accidental ingestion needs quick medical attention. I’ve seen the aftermath of careless handling—lost work, ruined samples, mounting paperwork. Labs following OSHA or EU CHS regulations install proper fume hoods and insist on gloves and goggles. Instructors drill new interns on bottle labeling, waste disposal, and using emergency showers. Industry moves bulk stocks using grounded transfer lines and spark-proof equipment to minimize fire risk. There’s simply no shortcut for genuine respect for proper handling practices. The more comfortable familiarity breeds, the likelier someone forgets these lessons, and that’s where accidents happen. Regular safety training and reminders help keep complacency at bay.
I’ve watched 2,5-lutidine get woven through reaction schemes across pharma, materials, and pure research. Medicinal chemists rely on its predictable behavior during stepwise synthesis, especially where selectivity is key. Agrochemical companies design intermediates for herbicides and insecticides, counting on the compound’s manageable toxicity and tunable reactivity. In advanced materials R&D, it crops up in ligand design for catalysts or metal-organic frameworks—each application drawing on the stability and modest reactivity of the methylated pyridine core. Some flavors and fragrances incorporate methylpyridines for subtle notes and molecular stability, but food applications demand stringent controls. Researchers in university settings reach for lutidine in casework because it often works where stronger bases prove too aggressive or messy. Its expertise lies not in flash or potency, but in a steady, modest performance where it keeps side products to a minimum. Labs favor tools that fit reliably into complex procedures—and lutidine often proves its worth this way.
Academic and industrial research around pyridine derivatives continues to push boundaries, even as regulatory landscapes evolve. I’ve followed studies probing greener synthesis routes, biocatalytic pathways, and robust recycling methods to cut down on hazardous byproducts. Meanwhile, groups investigating ligand modification for metal catalysis highlight 2,5-lutidine as a base template, fine-tuning properties through tailored substitutions. Advanced spectroscopic analysis gives deeper insight into ring electron dynamics and how methyl positioning shapes both reactivity and toxicity. Research into safer handling protocols, storage stabilization, and spill response drills feed directly into upgraded lab practice. Encouragingly, collaborative efforts between academia and multinational suppliers move toward both higher purity grades and minimized hazardous waste. All this innovation reinforces the compound’s value and responds to public and worker safety expectations.
Toxicity always tracks closely behind performance, as many of my toxicology-minded peers remind me. Studies show that 2,5-lutidine, though less toxic than more reactive organic amines, still packs enough hazard to warrant careful engineering controls. Inhalation irritates mucous membranes, ingestion causes stomach distress, and extended skin contact can upset sensitive users. Animal studies reveal moderate acute toxicity, so safety trainers keep antidotes and first-aid supplies stocked near work areas. Long-term exposure data comes mainly from animal testing and epidemiological studies among chemical plant workers, and while serious chronic effects look less probable than with some pyridine relatives, vigilance holds. Ongoing reviews by environmental health bodies drive updates in labeling, recommended limits, and handling standards. Waste treatment and effluent monitoring in manufacturing districts guard against build-ups in water tables and air. Calls for more eco-friendly synthetic alternatives grow louder as climate and sustainability enter center stage in chemical practice.
It’s easy to overlook everyday solvents and bases in favor of trendier new molecules, but 2,5-lutidine looks poised to keep earning its place in chemical toolkits. Cumulative research into safe handling, greener synthetic routes, and precise applications bolster both sustainability and efficiency arguments. Chasing down more selective catalysts and greener chemistry, labs seek ways to minimize hazardous byproducts—driving interest in fine-tuned methylated pyridine routes that combine performance with significantly lower environmental impact. The regulatory push for lower exposure limits and comprehensive environmental management shapes ongoing research and quality control. Flexible, reliable reagents maintain an edge in education and industry alike. If there’s one lesson, it’s that small, unflashy molecules often hold steady at the foundation, letting new innovations build confidently upward. I’ve seen generations of chemists reach for lutidine, not because it dazzles, but because it lets careful hands craft something solid and safe—a principle the chemical world can stand to remember.
2,5-Lutidine stands out as a chemical with a distinct smell, yellowish tint, and a background rooted deep in chemistry labs. At its core, it’s a type of pyridine molecule featuring two methyl groups, which change its character both in the flask and out in the world. This compound pops up mostly wherever organic chemists set up shop, be it a university research lab or an industrial plant.
When I walked through the doors of my first synthetic chemistry lab, the bottle of 2,5-lutidine sat right next to the other reagents, unobtrusive yet often called upon. In practice, chemists reach for this compound as a base—a chemical partner that mops up acids formed during reactions. Some reactions just won’t finish without a strong base, and this one usually doesn’t interfere with delicate molecules, unlike stronger bases that can rip or rearrange the target. That makes it a dependable sidekick for fine-tuned transformations, especially for making things like pharmaceuticals, agrichemicals, dyes, and fragrances.
Industries see value in 2,5-lutidine’s gentle yet effective touch. It smooths out reactions that build complicated molecules for drugs, polymers, and newer materials. The pharmaceutical sector, in particular, relies on purity and reaction control, so a selective and predictable base can spell the difference between a batch of life-saving medicine and a pile of unusable waste. What really matters to many industries is getting those clean outcomes, making sure no hidden by-products sneak into the final product.
Handling 2,5-lutidine brings up fresh concerns for those of us working in labs or near chemical facilities. Anyone who’s worked with it will tell you about the sting in the nose from even a whiff. Extended exposure without proper ventilation can irritate the eyes and lungs, so lab coats, gloves, and fume hoods aren’t optional luxuries—they’re non-negotiable protection. The compound’s persistence means that spills or poor disposal don’t just evaporate harmlessly. Soil and water systems might hold onto it, and that can mean longer-term pollution risks.
Research hasn’t pinned down all the long-term effects, but studies point to toxicity, especially for aquatic life. Drumbeat reminders to use spill kits, store chemicals tightly, and follow established waste routes don’t come out of nowhere—they arise from experience with what can go wrong.
Anyone serious about chemistry, whether in a teaching lab or a factory, needs to tackle the downstream risks. Substitutes for 2,5-lutidine exist, but sometimes none does the job quite the same way. That places the burden on those of us using it to push for safer workspaces and transparent disposal.
Some places encourage a greener approach: build smaller batches, recycle solvent, or engineer reactions so there’s less toxic waste. In my own time in the lab, we leaned hard on shared fume hoods, labeled all containers, and swapped notes whenever someone spotted an accident waiting to happen. It’s not flashy, but safety and stewardship often grow from that sort of habit.
Engineers and environmental chemists team up now more than ever to rethink how chemicals move through a facility, tightening checks on storage and transport. Small changes in how we handle 2,5-lutidine—stronger ventilation, better labeling, regular safety drills—pile up over time and cut down those “what if” moments everyone dreads.
As long as 2,5-lutidine keeps earning its keep in research and industry, it deserves serious attention. Respecting both what it can do in the right hands and the risks it poses in the wrong ones makes all the difference. Every bottle on a shelf is a reminder: smart choices protect both our science and our world.
Standing inside a lab for any amount of time, you start to get used to names like 2,5-lutidine. It isn’t some rare unicorn. You’ll spot this compound on shelf labels across college chemistry departments and industrial plants. It’s a clear, colorless liquid, smells sharp, and evaporates into the air fairly quickly. Most of us who’ve handled chemicals for years don’t get nervous around every volatile liquid. Still, this one isn’t lemonade.
2,5-Lutidine can irritate your eyes, nose, and throat even at moderate vapor levels. So, if you open a bottle without gloves or goggles, don’t be surprised to feel a sting. Breathing in too much vapor gets uncomfortable fast—dizziness, headache, and that classic taste in the mouth that signals your body it’s better to step away. Liquid splashes won’t eat away at your hand, but you’ll feel the burn, especially if your skin already has cuts. That isn’t speculation—it’s what I’ve seen and heard time and again from peers.
Repeated contact hasn’t shown cancer risk in humans, but animal studies push us to stay on guard. The European Chemicals Agency labels it toxic to aquatic life with long-term effects. Hazard info from the National Institutes of Health backs up what many chemists notice—this isn’t just a simple skin irritant. Its industrial uses bring it into water systems, and that’s where big problems can build up fast. If a loading dock spill hits a drain, fish stocks in local creeks can wipe out for months.
It’s tempting to treat small-scale chemical jobs lightly. People sometimes leave bottles open longer than needed or ignore the unmarked container at the back of the storage cabinet. This stuff has a way of reminding you to respect the small print on those warning labels. I’ve worked in labs where old habits died hard, and the price for shortcuts came in the form of headaches, watering eyes, and untold environmental costs.
The world’s not waiting for 2,5-lutidine to hit the movie screens, but regulators have noticed. Limits on airborne concentrations keep dropping each decade. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and European agencies continue reviewing its safe use. As of now, you can safely dispose of it only through licensed chemical waste companies.
Gloves and goggles are a baseline. Good fume hoods save your lungs. Staff training beats posters on the wall. Some folks want less business regulation, but if you’ve ever seen a fire sparked by a volatile spill or a river altered for years, you understand the value of oversight. Chemical supply houses have set up return programs for unused solvents. Labs secure better-fitting lids and leakproof bottles to reduce steady evaporation.
In my career, making safety routine has helped avoid trouble. Reminding colleagues to check the safety data sheet or reviewing spill procedures is not bureaucracy gone wild—it saves actual work hours and lives down the line. 2,5-Lutidine needs respect, not panic. Anyone who takes the time to store and use it right can dodge trouble—inside the lab and outside, where the streams and fields around us aren’t just background noise.
It’s easy to get buried by textbook terms in chemistry, but breaking things down makes it all clearer. 2,5-Lutidine stands out in labs, industries, and university lecture halls for its signature smell and its ability to ease complex reactions. Its formula, C7H9N, pops up on chemical inventory lists, signaling a member of the pyridine family, snugly fitted with two methyl groups. That might sound routine on first read, but there’s more going on under the surface here.
Anyone who’s spent time around chemical benches knows formulas unlock stories. C7H9N means seven carbon atoms, nine hydrogens, and one nitrogen atom, arranged so two methyl groups decorate the second and fifth positions of its six-membered ring. For many, a wipe of the nose and you’ve met the sharp, fishy tang of pyridine derivatives. 2,5-Lutidine’s role as a base might sound technical, but it means this compound can shift the outcome of a reaction, helping chemists fine-tune how molecules interact.
During graduate research, I saw how the basicity of various lutidines shapes what happens next in organic setups. That second methyl at the “five-spot” makes this isomer behave just differently enough to be treasured in synthesis. The positions of these methyl groups are more than trivia; they steer how the nitrogen can attract or share electrons, making some steps possible that pure pyridine can’t deliver on its own.
Selecting the right base isn’t guesswork. 2,5-Lutidine comes off the shelf for specific reactions that are fussy about side reactions, isolation steps, and final product purity. Pharmaceutical chemists rely on it to tweak reaction environments, shaving time off synthesis routes. Agrochemical labs echo the same need, using it for pesticide scaffolds, growth regulators, and fine-tuning bioactive molecules.
Then there’s safety and environmental impact. The distinct smell cues proper handling—and lets trainees recognize leaks instantly, which beats reading a label when seconds count. Common wisdom says that exposure should be limited and spills cleaned fast due to possible health effects. Regulations around chemical storage and disposal get real traction here. Anyone storing lutidine learns to follow guidelines lined out in materials safety data sheets, with local environmental laws acting as a second line of defense.
Given the global drive to green chemistry, groups continue hunting for alternatives with less bite to ecosystems and lab workers alike. Some startups have tackled recycling spent lutidine, not just burning it, so less winds up as hazardous waste. Process chemists push suppliers for detailed impurity breakdowns in each batch, reducing surprises in production. In education, hands-on guidance during lab sessions beats theory, teaching the new wave of chemists not just what this formula means, but why stewardship matters for the next generation.
So, C7H9N isn’t just a notation. It shapes choices on safety, progress, and responsibility—lab by lab, bottle by bottle.
2,5-Lutidine usually comes up in chemistry labs as a favorite among organic chemists. It's a clear liquid, smells sharp and persistent, and doesn’t mix quietly with careless storage habits. Growing up around labs, I remember seeing the warning stickers not just as red tape, but as a real sign this chemical could bite if ignored.
Start with the basics. 2,5-Lutidine ignites easily. Its flash point sits fairly low, around 62°C, meaning it won’t wait for you to pay attention before turning dangerous. Anyone who has scorched a flask or seen a solvent catch understands that storing flammables with respect isn’t about bureaucracy, but about keeping your building standing.
A good rule goes: keep any bottle of this stuff capped tight, never near a heat source, and absolutely away from sparks. Store it in a flame-resistant cabinet built for flammable liquids. That’s more than a box with a lock; these cabinets use steel shells and venting to slow a fire.
Humidity and sunlight quickly turn 2,5-Lutidine unstable. I recall a busy summer when someone left a bottle near a sunny window; the smell carried through the entire wing by lunch. Exposure like that speeds up breakdown, feeds corrosion, and makes accidental leaks more likely. Shelves for chemicals like this sit out of the sun and away from moisture, usually near cool floors where temperatures stay steady. Any contact with strong acids or oxidizers ramps up the risk for violent reactions, so always separate these groups into clear sections of the storage area.
Glass bottles resist most chemical attacks. Polyethylene sometimes joins the game, but only if the supplier says it’s safe for the product. Metal lids often rust after a few months, so labs opt for chemical-resistant plastic or Teflon-lined closures. Leaky seals mean spills, lost money, and sometimes injuries, so quality in containers matters. Inspect bottles before transferring a chemical—one tiny crack in the neck may become a much bigger mess by the next day.
Every container stands marked: name, concentration, date received. Missing a label leads straight to waste and confusion. In my experience, detailed labeling isn’t just about rules, but about knowing exactly what’s on the shelf when you’re in a rush or when rotating old stock. Digital inventory systems help, but a clear label in bold ink wins every time during a power outage or an emergency evacuation.
Hazardous chemical storage hinges less on good intentions than on repetition and discipline. New techs or students can repeat training every semester; hands-on drills stick better than printed handbooks. If anyone smells a leak, sees a corroded shelf, or notices a bottle sweating through the label, reporting it early saves big headaches later.
Invest in fireproof cabinets. Use spill trays. Update labels. Set up a small, laminated quick-reference chart for every hazardous section—simple measures that keep everyone safe and keep surprise accidents off the agenda. It’s these habits, built by a mix of experience, facts, and a touch of healthy fear, that create a lab people can work in confidently, day after day.
2,5-Lutidine, a member of the pyridine family, pops up with some very specific traits. It looks like a colorless to pale yellow liquid, which tells you right off it doesn't hide well in mixtures. Pour a bit out and you’ll notice a strong, almost stubborn, amine-like odor—something not easily missed in a working lab or production setting. The molecular formula, C7H9N, gives away its structure: a six-membered ring with two methyl groups sticking firmly at the 2 and 5 positions. Those extra methyl groups do a lot more than just fill space; they change how chemists handle this compound compared to plain pyridine.
2,5-Lutidine’s boiling point lands around 158°C, hotter than your kitchen but low for many chemical processes. That means it sits well as a solvent, especially when you want something more volatile than water but not as flighty as ether. The melting point is another story. At about -46°C, it stays liquid at freezer temperatures, which comes in handy for wintertime fieldwork or cold-region labs. No need to worry about it freezing on a shelf next to dry ice.
The density hovers near 0.925 g/cm3 at 20°C, making it a bit lighter than water. Pour it in, and it’ll float right to the top. This lighter density needs careful handling if spill containment is a concern, especially when there’s water around. Solubility plays a big part in its use; 2,5-Lutidine dissolves easily in most organic solvents. It mixes with alcohols, ethers, and even chloroform without trouble, though it doesn’t make friends with water. You’ll see just a slight solubility in water, which keeps the compound from wandering off during aqueous washes.
Volatility drives safety precautions in the lab. 2,5-Lutidine has a vapor pressure of roughly 2 mmHg at 25°C. It doesn’t race off as quickly as some volatile organic compounds, but you will still pick up its presence in the air if a lid slips loose. Good ventilation, local exhaust, and a bit of common sense keep workspaces safe. Those who work with this stuff know the odor means it's floating around, and that's a sign to tighten up any process leaks.
In chemical synthesis, the reactivity of 2,5-Lutidine shines because it balances basicity and steric hindrance. Its pKa sits near 6.7, which gives it enough punch to act as a base in organic reactions, yet it’s not strong enough to interfere with sensitive functionalities. This trait lets chemists target specific steps in synthetic sequences without unintended side reactions. I've found it makes a reliable base for acylation and alkylation, where you want just enough activity—not too much. That specificity saves time, materials, and headaches down the line.
Handling 2,5-Lutidine brings real concerns. Its vapor can irritate eyes and the respiratory system. In my own experience, even brief exposure in an under-ventilated area makes you feel the consequences—headache, watery eyes, and that persistent smell on your hands if you’re not wearing gloves. Since it’s flammable, open flames or static discharge can be a hazard. Chemical spill kits, proper PPE, and smart storage are non-negotiable—any lapse shows up fast.
As demand for specialty chemicals grows, the importance of sustainably and safely handling compounds like 2,5-Lutidine will only rise. Substitution with less hazardous bases or automated containment in production lines can make a difference. Investing in improved ventilation and ongoing training helps teams avoid exposure and accidental releases—both are investments that pay off in long-term safety and environmental protection. Paying real attention to these properties ensures a more responsible future in both research and industry.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | 3,6-Dimethylpyridine |
| Other names |
2,5-Dimethylpyridine 2,5-Lutidin |
| Pronunciation | /ˈluːtɪˌdiːn/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 583-58-4 |
| Beilstein Reference | 603488 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:28919 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL14238 |
| ChemSpider | 6084 |
| DrugBank | DB01883 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 100.005.157 |
| EC Number | 202-805-4 |
| Gmelin Reference | 624 |
| KEGG | C01781 |
| MeSH | D003401 |
| PubChem CID | 8856 |
| RTECS number | SE9625000 |
| UNII | 4R5VT41Y2G |
| UN number | UN2310 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C7H9N |
| Molar mass | 107.16 g/mol |
| Appearance | Colorless to pale yellow liquid |
| Odor | Pyridine-like odor |
| Density | 0.925 g/mL at 25 °C (lit.) |
| Solubility in water | soluble |
| log P | 0.91 |
| Vapor pressure | 0.85 mmHg (25°C) |
| Acidity (pKa) | 6.7 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 6.70 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -49.2·10⁻⁶ cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.491 |
| Viscosity | 1.008 mPa·s (20 °C) |
| Dipole moment | 1.27 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 153.34 J mol⁻¹ K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | −12.7 kJ·mol⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -3330.8 kJ/mol |
| Hazards | |
| GHS labelling | GHS02, GHS07 |
| Pictograms | GHS06,GHS08 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H302, H311, H331, H319, H335 |
| Precautionary statements | P280, P261, P304+P340, P312, P302+P352, P305+P351+P338, P332+P313, P337+P313 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-3-0 |
| Flash point | 68 °C |
| Autoignition temperature | 515 °C |
| Explosive limits | 1.1–7.8% |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 oral rat 200 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose) of 2,5-Lutidine: "400 mg/kg (oral, rat) |
| NIOSH | SN2975000 |
| PEL (Permissible) | PEL: 5 ppm |
| REL (Recommended) | 25 ppm |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | 500 ppm |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
2,6-Lutidine 2,4-Lutidine 3,5-Lutidine 2-Picoline 3-Picoline 4-Picoline Pyridine |